Slashdot Mirror


MINI-ITX and the Future of PC Case Design?

An anonymous reader writes "One of the interesting things to come out of the recent Computex electronics show in Taiwan was striking new PC cases — in particular systems built around tiny Mini-ITX boards. What may have once been regarded as the weird little brother of the more common Micro-ATX, the popularity of PCs built with these boards seems to be gradually building. This year at Computex saw the first Mini-ITX boards to support USB 3.0 and SATA 6Gbps, and a variety of new shapes and styles in both Micro-ATX and Mini-ITX case design. This photo gallery shows some of the more striking examples of these new PC cases from Computex, including one that appears to be modelled on an Xbox 360, and one with a VESA mount for strapping to the back of a monitor. Interestingly, while these designs have usually been associated with home theatre system PCs, or for saving space on office desktops, there is also now a trend towards pushing 'gamer' features like windows and multiple fans into these small form factor cases."

36 of 164 comments (clear)

  1. That's cute and everything.... by AnonymousClown · · Score: 2, Interesting
    That's cute but if you put those small motherboards in a small case, what's going to happen with all that heat generated by the processor and all the other components for that matter?

    Or put to it this way, if you have to put it in a large case to allow for enough air flow, what the point in having such a small motherboard?

    --
    RIP America

    July 4, 1776 - September 11, 2001

    1. Re:That's cute and everything.... by tepples · · Score: 4, Informative

      what's going to happen with all that heat generated by the processor and all the other components for that matter?

      You don't have to use the fastest CPU. You can use a CPU with a lower thermal design power, add liquid cooling tubes, and fit it into a smaller case. Hey, it works for Microsoft (or at least it does as of the Jasper revision of the Xbox 360 console).

    2. Re:That's cute and everything.... by InsertWittyNameHere · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm in the market for an affordable mac mini sized computer (with similar specs, i.e. no Atom) to use with my TV. I find my PS3 just doesn't cut it anymore since it won't play ALL media formats (lame).

      So ya, I agree with parent. MAKE THE CASES SMALLER!

    3. Re:That's cute and everything.... by LWATCDR · · Score: 4, Informative

      You do not need a big case for good airflow. In fact the best cases often have ducts to direct the airflow. Also people are working hard to cut down on heat.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    4. Re:That's cute and everything.... by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's cute but if you put those small motherboards in a small case, what's going to happen with all that heat generated by the processor and all the other components for that matter?

      I've built several systems using these small form factor items, and with careful placement I've built fanless systems that are still running 2-3 years later. I was on a budget, so I dind't use flash storage, and even then, the heat remained 'manageable'.

      What I would do today is this: I'd run a standard wall-wart power supply to provide the DC power and thus remove the powersupply as part of the equation. I'd use the mounting as a heat-sink near the heat generating portions of the board. I'd also use a flash drive for data storage. I didn't do any of those things with my current setup and as I mentioned, it is running well.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    5. Re:That's cute and everything.... by Enleth · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's probably going to be removed by the means of air ducts and high flow fans. The size of a case is not directly linked to its heat removal capacity. Sure it helps with piss-poor heat management with no ducted or at least heavily directed air flow and semi-random fan selection and placement as seen in most generic ATX cases, but it's still perfectly possible to remove a huge amount of heat from a very tightly packed case. It's somewhat more expensive and requires more know-how and though wchich increases the final cost, but it's nothing for someone who can afford dual 5790s.

      --
      This is Slashdot. Common sense is futile. You will be modded down.
    6. Re:That's cute and everything.... by level_headed_midwest · · Score: 3, Interesting

      These mini-ITX units are more or less laptops in a slightly larger case and without an integrated monitor and keyboard. They generally have to use low-TDP processors (45-65 watts or less) because you can't fit a high-capacity ATX PSU in a mini-ITX case and the small fans required by the small cases can't dissipate the heat from high-TDP parts. They are popular for HTPCs and business desktops since you generally want a small, unobtrusive machine that can be easily connected to a separate monitor, has standard, replaceable parts, and does not need to be particularly powerful. But you certainly won't see anybody who does much for heavy work using one of these machines. They'll continue to use larger desktop boards and cases that fit high-TDP, high-performance parts and multiple disks.

      Using a larger case to fit a smaller board is not necessarily a bad idea. Larger cases can accommodate more disks, a larger number of larger fans for better cooling, and give more room to work in while building and maintaining the computer. Mini-ITX cases are seriously small and a real PITA to work with, but putting one of those boards in a micro-ATX case solves that problem very well. I learned my lesson trying to shoehorn parts into cases that were technically large enough but a very tight fit with everything installed and now almost always buy a case that fits a board one size larger than what I'm intending to install. A good desktop setup with an ATX motherboard, a decent GPU (which is generally about 9-10" long) and a few disks is a tight fit in an ATX mid-tower case but has plenty of room in an Extended ATX-capable full-tower case.

      --
      Just "gittin-r-done," day after day.
    7. Re:That's cute and everything.... by level_headed_midwest · · Score: 2, Informative

      You are correct in the fact that you don't need a big case for good airflow due to ducting. However, you need a larger case to fit large enough fans to get good airflow quietly. A 1U server case generally has good enough airflow to passively cool several hundred watts' worth of CPUs, but those little fans have to spin so quickly to provide that airflow that they're almost deafening.

      --
      Just "gittin-r-done," day after day.
    8. Re:That's cute and everything.... by Logibeara · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I expected crazy case designs when reading the summary, i.e. Non box shapes. However, I was very disappointed to see that cases have been more or less similar for the last 5 years.

      When do I get to see boards mounted inside of hollowed out encyclopedias?

      --
      I'd rather search for the answers than just ask the questions.
    9. Re:That's cute and everything.... by Willuz · · Score: 5, Informative

      I run a mini-ITX with Core 2 Duo Mobile chip and it runs fast, cool, completely silent and still plays HD video flawlessly. Having a large case actually makes it harder to move the air since there's more volume to be moved. The low volume of a mini-ITX case allows it to exchange it's hot air for cool air much faster even with low RPM quiet fans.

    10. Re:That's cute and everything.... by rwa2 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I have one of these on my desk:
      http://www.mini-box.com/M350-universal-mini-itx-enclosure

      You'd need to throw in an external optical drive, but then you could get whatever you wanted.

    11. Re:That's cute and everything.... by Rogerborg · · Score: 4, Funny

      people are working hard to cut down on heat.

      They'd be more successful if they took it easy.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    12. Re:That's cute and everything.... by moonbender · · Score: 2, Informative

      Small cases do limit the size of the heat sink, though.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    13. Re:That's cute and everything.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://www.mini-itx.com/projects/encyclomedia/

    14. Re:That's cute and everything.... by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can solve that easily.

      The problem is that even if you have properly configured GLX for your Intel GMA or similar, Flash thinks it's not a supported GL environment, and uses software rendering. That's because Flash sucks donkey balls.

      Just go and edit /etc/adobe/mms.cfg, and set OverrideGPUValidation to 1.

      I did that with several atom-based motherboards, including several mini-itx mobos from Intel and Foxconn (with Atom 230, 330 and 510) and several GMA cards, including the 950 and the 3150. I can play HD flash video just fine.

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    15. Re:That's cute and everything.... by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Unless the case IS the heat sink.

    16. Re:That's cute and everything.... by default+luser · · Score: 5, Insightful

      having a large case actually makes it harder to move the air since there's more volume to be moved.

      No. It is easier to move a volume of air through an unconstrained space than it is through a constrained space. Just try breathing through a 2-inch PVC pipe and then a garden hose, and tell me you're getting the same amount of air for the same amount of work performed by your lungs. Ducting is essential to cooling inside of a case (thus the enclosed space), but wider-open ducts are way less of an impediment.

      Small cases also have the disadvantage that the airflow is rarely straight-through: there are often very tight turns inside the case required to pack so many components inside. Every time the airstream has to turn, it slows down. An open mid-tower ATX case has very few blockages between the front and back, so airflow is much less impeded.

      The low volume of a mini-ITX case allows it to exchange it's hot air for cool air much faster even with low RPM quiet fans.

      That logic is terrible. Just because you can replace the air inside of a case faster with air outside does not mean you are cooling things faster. It's not the air volume of the case that matters, but the continuous air flow that cools things down. The size of the case has NOTHING to do with cooling potential, so your sentence shows you have no clue what you are talking about.

      As far as airflow goes: smaller cases are typically limited because they cannot use larger fans - and since quiet operation is usually the goal for these things, you are severely limited by how much airflow you can push through while maintaining silence.

      Most MiniITX cases use 60mm to 80mm fans for airflow, as-opposed to the much more efficient 120mm (and larger) fans used on quiet ATX cases. It's a well-known fact that the larger an axial fan gets, it can generate more CFM per watt / per decibel. Smaller cases just can't leverage that fact, and so they are limited to low-wattage operation only.

      I'm not trying to disrespect your setup, but PLEASE don't spread bullshit you know isn't true. The only reason your MiniITX system is silent is because you started by paying extra for (or compromising on) low-power components (like your mobile core 2 duo, which is slower than desktop equivalents, and costs more). You really can't build anything like a powerful gaming system or a 6-core processing behemoth, and expect it to remain silent inside of a MiniITX case (it's going to sound like a wind tunnel). But you have the potential to do this in a full-sized case.

      --

      Man is the animal that laughs.
      And occasionally whores for Karma.

    17. Re:That's cute and everything.... by cynyr · · Score: 2, Funny

      it's not always the size of the heatsink, but how you use it....

      Anyways, some small heatsinks work just as well or better than a lot of large ones. Also things like airflow management have at least as much impact as the size of the coolers.

      --
      All of the above was encrypted with a Quad ROT-13 method. Unauthorized decryption is in violation of the DMCA.
  2. I'm no expert, but I'm curious by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 3, Interesting

    These boards are getting very close in size to some of the microcontrollers I've worked with in the past (HC12, etc) It was just for college, and I've no real world experience in them, so I was wondering if some of the more advanced hobby builders or professionals could comment on this:

    These boards are getting much lower in power-consumption and seem to offer a lot more in terms of flexibility, and by providing the ability to run standard operating systems through the use of SSDs you have available to you a vast number of open projects which you can tailor for your purposes. The cost is now around $100 or so, which is what I remember the microcontrollers costing.

    So, given the choice between some of the newer mini-ITX systems, what are the advantages that a basic microcontroller would offer?

    (Again, it's been a while since I did anything with them, so I might be missing something big)

    --
    Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    1. Re:I'm no expert, but I'm curious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Microcontroller boards have different I/O. Such as an LCD controller (to connect directly to a panel, not through a VGA cable), general purpose I/O pins to control or take input from any wire you want, SPI and I2C for communicating with other chips. They'll have USB, but are likely to have a device or on-the-go port in addition to a host only port. And they usually need fewer chips to build a working system, sometimes only one, so they can be smaller.

    2. Re:I'm no expert, but I'm curious by Enleth · · Score: 3, Informative

      There's no such thing as a "basic microcontroler". There's so much variety amon microcontrollers that your question almost makes no sense.

      An ATmega88, a lower-end uC, costs $0.50, measures about 10x10x3mm and consumes less than 15mA at 5V when running at full speed, which is 20MHz and less than 250uA at 1.8V, 1MHz. With a few kilobytes of RAM and a few more of flash it might look like a joke, but a skilled programmer can implement quite a lot on one and it will work on a single AAA battery for weeks. Years on a sealed AGM.

      --
      This is Slashdot. Common sense is futile. You will be modded down.
    3. Re:I'm no expert, but I'm curious by jwietelmann · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's no such thing as a "basic microcontroler".

      BASIC Stamp Microcontroller Module

      (Yes, I know that's not what you meant.)

  3. optical illusion by buback · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I thought the first picture in the gallery was a joke for a couple seconds. The angle of the shot makes it look like it's the size of a coffee table!

    1. Re:optical illusion by KlaymenDK · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yeah, I was paging through that slide show thinking "hideous, hideous, also hideous ... and hideous." Are these the more notable ones because they're fugly, or is that just the state of the art?
      I mean, individuals can make cases that are so much more attractive ... such as the "Deco Box" or the "Rundfunker", or even toaster fer cryin' out loud!
      http://mini-itx.com/projects/decobox/
      http://mini-itx.com/projects/rundfunker/
      http://mini-itx.com/projects/toasterpc/page3.asp

      I was looking for a case for an htpc recently, and the only useful case I could find that didn't come with un-covered front (usb, fiwi, headphone) ports was a Silverstone LASCALA LC16M. Seriously, one case?

    2. Re:optical illusion by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No kidding. PC design needs more Dieter Rams and less Liberace.

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    3. Re:optical illusion by vlueboy · · Score: 2, Informative

      That "Deco" style case is lovely... My wife would even allow that in the living room, methinks :-)

      But would she allow the Manga Doll case there? ;)
      Maybe changing the Doll to look like a french maid girl?

  4. I've been thinking about this by Pojut · · Score: 3, Informative

    Be sure to take a look at the [H]ard|Forum worklogs, there are a lot of active, small form factor projects going on right now. One guy has a SUPER awesome mITX rig in the process of being built, complete with custom case and watercooling solution.

    Also, for kicks, my (non-impressive) [H]ard|Forum sig:

    Display: Asus VH236H | Dell 2005FPW
    Foundation: Cooler Master Storm Scout | OCZ ModXStream Pro 700w
    System: Gigabyte GA-MA785GM | AMD Athlon 64 X2 5400+ @ 3.2 GHz | Corsair XMS2 4GB DDR2 800 | ATI 4850
    Internal Storage: Diamondmax 21 system | WD15EADS archives
    External Storage: 1.25TB in a KINGWIN DK-32U-S | WDMER1600TN
    Input: Kensington 64325 Expert Mouse | Saitek Eclipse II | M-Audio Axiom 25
    Headphones: non-amped Audio Technica ATH-AD700

  5. 1 Step Closer... by FinchWorld · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...to building my own laptop? Ok, I can technically do this now, but parts are often motherboard specific, with ITX and smaller form factors it might be possible to buy generic laptop cases/batteries and swap parts as it ages.

    Well, I can dream anyway...

    --
    "I may be full of crap about this game, and I may be wrong, and that's fine." -Jack Thompson
    1. Re:1 Step Closer... by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well, I can dream anyway...

      5 years ago I had the idea to build a briefcase sized laptop. I was going for style over performance, and changed my design half-way through due to the expense (I was just out of college and still on ramen budgets) so I didn't invest in a laptop LCD. However, I kept the laptop formfactor for my internal components. Here is what I did:

      Using only non-laptop components. I found a very slim power supply that was typically designed for a 1U rack. This ran alongside the motherboard and was about as tall as the entire board (PCB+RAM height) I used a board that had built in video,ethernet,sound so I wouldn't have to have any vertical PCI cards. Since I didn't have to use the PCI ports, I placed the HDD over this location and it rested on the plastic risers (Top of the HDD on the plastic) I couldn't do much about the RAM but it didn't stick up above the capacitors very much. I used a processor heatsink with a fan since this would let me get away with a smaller heatsink, though the processor in the board would probably run with just a basic heatsink and no fan. I used a standard 5.25" DVD drive which sat next to the power supply and next to the motherboard.

      I took two aluminum sheets and drilled holes to attach the motherboard to the bottom sheet, and the HDD, DVD, and Powersupply were attached to the upper sheet. They were then sandwiched together and I used short bolts to hold the two halves together.

      The result was something on the order of 12" x 12" x 1.75" (can't remember the exact dimensions). Due to the way the components were sandwiched, it was fairly robust and I was able to mount it with shock absorbers inside a travel case.

      Later when I had more cash, I built it into an ammo-can and included a fold-out monitor and keyboard/touchpad. It turned into an AMAZING little portable server for things like LAN parties.

      With it's 1'x1'x1.75" dimensions, I'm sure that I could have easily put it inside a briefcase and built in a display. I just went with the ammo-can because having a truly rugged portable computer was useful to me. (in addition to being waterproof)

      With today's boards and SSD storage It would probably be no trouble at all.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
  6. Wow, rectangles! by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I fail to see what's so striking about rectangular boxes. These aren't really any different from what we've been seeing for the last 10+ years or so. Some of them are a bit stylish, but I don't see any new innovations in the photos posted in TFA. What's so striking about these, exactly?

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  7. I'd consider the families a little differently. by mr_mischief · · Score: 4, Informative

    Micro-ATX is the little brother of ATX, and Flex-ATX is the little brother to Micro-ATX. ITX is a different nuclear family (call them cousins). Mini-ITX, micro-ITX, nano-ITX, and even pico-ITX boards exist.

    ATX was initially designed by Intel and the official updates to it have been specified by them as well. The original design was as a replacement for the dated AT boards as a general-purpose desktop and server role. Smaller versions have become popular as more circuitry has been built onto the motherboard, requiring fewer expansion slots. ATX, EATX, Micro-ATX and Flex-ATX use the same mounting hole layout (except that EATX uses a few extra holes).

    AMD designed DTX to be hole-compatible with ATX cases, BTW.

    ITX was initially designed by Via, as are the updates. ITX was initially designed as an embedded or industrial form factor where size, cooling, and energy efficiency were key factors. The smaller sizes (mini, nano, and pico) have been around for some time, but have been slow to become popular for general desktop use as they have been primarily built for Via's own low-power processors.

    The industrial and embedded form factor PC/104 is actually smaller than all of these form factors, with mobile-ITX (which requires an additional I/O board) being the only open standard board smaller. PC/104 was developed by AmPro and has been around since 1987.

    The Beagle Board is smaller still, but is not x86/x86_64 compatible. The only current ways to get smaller that I'm aware of is to ditch the motherboard altogether and go with a computer-on-module or system-on-chip design or to pony up and design your own motherboard standard.

  8. Re:form vs function by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you want toolless, your best bet is actually soulless corporate drone-boxxen. They tend to be crushingly ugly; and slightly more expensive per unit spec than gamer homebuilds; but they are explicitly designed so that a monkey could replace pretty much FRU(with the possible exception of the motherboard, which is often screwed down) with its bare hands, and an experienced tech can replace all the FRUs in ~5 minutes.

    Generic whitebox cases have gotten somewhat better in the toollessness department; but corporate drone-boxes have always been two steps ahead in that department.

  9. *sigh* by sootman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Looking at the "striking examples" I have to ask, does anyone other than 14-year-old gamers build computers anymore? Whatever happened to six flat sides? A basic cube-ish design is inexpensive to manufacture, easy to open up and get into, minimizes wasted space (are any of your components curvy? no? then your case shouldn't be either!) and you can easily lay it down, stand it up, or put things on top of it. I can understand no one wanting to put together a gallery of beige boxes but it would have been nice to see at least one clean example.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  10. 21st Century Calling! by Shuh · · Score: 2, Insightful

    These smaller form factors are overdue. Tower PCs the size of a labrador retriever are 90's technology.

  11. BTX - The Old Future of Case Design by BigSes · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have a BTX style Gateway case, and I still love it. Its spacious with a good amount of open bays, ample USB and Firewire connections. All while running quiet and cool (although the Northbridge puts off a bit of heat). I would love to upgrade it, as the box currently runs an older single core P4. However, there are only a handful of BTX mobos out there, and they dual core is the best you can get with a Socket 775 (I believe thats what it run, memory a bit hazy). I even thought about rigging something inside to attempt to upgrade a bit to something newer (tri or quad core), while keeping the same tower. After doing a good amount of research, it doesn't seem very logical to do, I suppose I will have to just find a case that I like as much as my Gateway.

  12. HTPC defined by tepples · · Score: 2, Informative

    No, not a hot topic. A home theater personal computer is a PC connected to a TV monitor, used in part for watching video and playing games.