Slashdot Mirror


Porn Sites More Infected Than Thought

nk497 writes "Porn sites are five times as likely to host malware as previously thought, with 3.6% offering up a digital infection of some sort, according to a researchers who set up their very own adult sites for a new study. One reason for the high rate of malware is that the online porn industry makes use of affiliate programs, where one site will drive traffic to another in exchange for links, cash, or simply free pornographic material to use. Because such programs don't check who they're doing business with, and sites use disguised links and other clandestine methods to drive people to different pages, it's easy for criminals to abuse the system to spread malware. Researcher Gilbert Wondracek said, 'They inadvertently have created an ecosystem that can easily be abused on a large scale by cyber criminals, and that's worrying.'"

28 of 170 comments (clear)

  1. That's ok... by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 4, Funny

    But that's ok... only ethically bad people use pornography, right? Right?

    What? You mean risks to one part of the internet make it less safe for the rest of us? Gasp!

    --
    Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
    altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    1. Re:That's ok... by Technician · · Score: 3, Funny

      You are here cruising Slashdot, where visitors can post links and such to stories, news articles, photos, and even porn sites posted by trolls. Just because you don't visit porn sites intentionally, dosen't mean someone with bad intent won't provide a link to a site. Mods often mod them down to troll before the general public provides lots of traffic.

      How do you know the link below is safe? The name of the site doesn't always indicate the contents.
      http://crazybuilders.com/ Note, the link is safe for work.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    2. Re:That's ok... by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm pretty sure he was being sarcastic/rhetorical

  2. 3.6% by deadhammer · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'd better run a full scan just in case.

    Not like I've been to as many porn sites as would be necessary to be statistically likely to have gotten infected. Several times over. Nosiree!

    --
    I'll be honest, we're throwing science against the wall to see what sticks. -Cave Johnson
  3. Yea right by mrsteveman1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    according to a researchers who set up their very own adult sites for a new study.

    Strictly for research purposes :)

    1. Re:Yea right by jack2000 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      We may joke all we want but it's about time porn distribution sites be managed by scientists. Meticulous classification of each video, maybe they can track usage statistics for fetishes etc.

    2. Re:Yea right by moderatorrater · · Score: 4, Funny

      Coed: Why are you doing these things to me and taping it again, professor?
      Professor: For science!

  4. Uhmm... no, duh? by mark-t · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wow... what a shocker! Porn sites have lots of malware! Who woulda guessed?

    Really... who on earth is actually surprised by this?

    1. Re:Uhmm... no, duh? by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Unsafe behavior leads to spread of viruses, film at eleven.

      (Eleven what?)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  5. Weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Weird.

    That is WAY lower than I'd have expected.

  6. Alternatively by SamSim · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't know the stats, but maybe it's more correct to say that malware sites are more likely to host pornography than they are to fall into other categories? It's probably the best way to attract large streams of users.

    1. Re:Alternatively by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Ya I think you need to work to separate sites that happen to have porn on them for various reasons, and sites who's business it is to sell porn. Just because a site has porn on it doesn't make it a porn site, at least not for a useful definition of the term. Now while I'm sure there are actual porn sites that are shady, I'm betting that there are far less than shady sites that try to use porn to lure people. After all, if your business is charging people a monthly fee for access, you want to keep them happy. Infecting them would be stupid. So you make a few bucks for the malware infection, but lose $20+ per month because the subscriber goes elsewhere.

    2. Re:Alternatively by The+Hatchet · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, there are tons of ways to attract large streams of users, but I think you are write hear. From what I have seen, most porn sites infected with maleware are literally stealing the porn from other sites, none of it is original, and you can never actually reach good porn, just links to porn that link to virii.

      To be honest, it sounds to me like the porn industry hates those bastards as much as we do.

      Also, having a stream of users that is not in a clear state of mind, frantically looking for something good to get off on, so they are really not as likely check the credentials of the site or think at all before clicking on something. It probably makes them easier to manipulate, and therefore easier to hack.

      --
      Where is the mod rating for "scary"? Also, ...
  7. Just like in real life... by GilliamOS · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You might catch something playing the field if you don't use protection!

    --
    "There might be intelligent beings created by God in outer space even if there are none here on Earth." -Anonymous
    1. Re:Just like in real life... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Fortunately, slashdot users never run into that sort of "real life" problem.

  8. Re:Simple one-person solution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    And here I was thinking your "simple one-person solution" was to browse porn sites...

  9. Funny Off-Topic-But-Related Note by no1home · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I work for a facility where a large number of our computers are for public use. We do not filter access (but if children are near someone known to be surfing porn, we have that person stop surfing such material). We all know some people choose to surf porn here, though it boggles the mind why.

    One day, I saw an older lady take a wet-nap style cleaning towel from the container we provide and begin cleaning the keyboard with it. I expressed my concern over using a WET-nap for an electronic part (they're for cleaning the desk, seat, hands, etc.).

    Lady: But you know they watch porn on these PCs, right?
    Me: Yes. We aren't allowed to filter the content. But cleaning the key...
    Lady: And you know these porn places are infected with all kinds of viruses, don't you?
    Me: ....?

    --
    I hope this comment is well received... I could have moderated instead!

    Persecutors will be violated!
    1. Re:Funny Off-Topic-But-Related Note by Aladrin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      On the other hand, the kind of person that surfs for porn in a public place is the kind you want to clean up after, computer viruses or not. She's making a smart move, if for the wrong reason.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
  10. Bad Advertisers in General by Bieeanda · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Porn sites aren't the only ones promiscuously mixing affiliates: there's a great deal of it going on with otherwise decent web advertisers as well, with results that range from the merely annoying to just as dangerous. It's very difficult to track the sources down beyond the first few layers because the whole thing is a bunged-up mess.

  11. It's a ripe environment for scammers by Perp+Atuitie · · Score: 4, Insightful

    not only because of the sloppy tech, but because of the clientele. Lots of money flowing from folks trying to lose their real identities and who are less likely than most to try and seek investigations if they get scammed. Doesn't get better than this.

  12. Re:So basically by erroneus · · Score: 3, Informative

    Actually no. Sex professionals take their occupation quite seriously. It is the non-professional who is lose and fast with their machines and their sexual practices. Do you think just "keeping a high moral standard" will keep you safe? Think again.

    Just as with computers, preventative measure and testing are needed. For me, I run Linux, Firefox, no-script and adblock. Testing isn't quite as required for me, but I routinely check processes running and the like. Sex workers frequently get tested and people in the industry know what other people in the industry have been up to for the most part. "average people" get sex diseases a LOT more often than sex industry pros.

  13. Re:Simple one-person solution... by commodore64_love · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yeah as long as you don't mount, you should be okay.

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
  14. Re:Simple one-person solution... by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...nothing on your HD is touched.

    What hard drive? ;-)

  15. But-Related by Ghoser777 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Haha, you said but-related.

    --
    James Tiberius Kirk: "Spock, the women on your planet are logical. No other planet in the galaxy can make that claim."
  16. Usage statistics for fetishes by Vekseid · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have experience in this area (see my sig). Harmless fetishes have a bit of a viral quality to them, sometimes following a pattern of Step 1) Revulsion Step 2) ??? Step 3) "You know, that's kind of hot."

  17. Re:safe sex by PatPending · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is there any kind of sex that is safe?

    My dog humping your leg?

    Anyway, here's a true story:

    When I was self-employed, my dog, Jake, used to lay on the floor by the check-out counter.

    One day while a guy was checking-out, Jake started licking his balls.

    Seeing this, the guy commented, "Gee, I wish I could do that!"

    I replied, "Go ahead--Jake won't mind.

    --
    What one fool can do, another can. (Ancient Simian Proverb)
  18. Re:safe sex by PatPending · · Score: 4, Funny

    Clarification:

    One day while a guy was checking-out, Jake started licking his (Jake's) balls.

    --
    What one fool can do, another can. (Ancient Simian Proverb)
  19. Selecting targets... by N0Man74 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think most of us realize that scammers, cheaters, criminals, and fraudsters prefer 2 types of targets:

    1) Those who are safe/easy prey.
    2) Those who they can justify doing it to, or even deserve it.

    Because of too many people find porn to be embarrassing or shameful, some people may not want to report or fight back. They make themselves into easy marks. Also, it's easy to find people who want porn, especially free porn (because of embarrassment, lots of people don't want their identities and payments traced back to them for these sites).

    Also, because porn is perceived as such a shady thing, it's easy for some to justify screwing over these types of people.

    In the end it's about getting away with it without being plagued by a guilty conscious.