Knuth Got It Wrong
davecb writes "Think you've mastered the art of server performance? Think again. Poul-Henning Kamp, in an article at ACM Queue, finds an off-by-ten error in btrees, because they fail to take virtual memory into account. And he solves the problem in the open source 'Varnish' HTTP accelerator, for all of us to see and use."
"Who the hell are you and what are you doing in my house?"
10 times faster? Yawn. Wake me up when it's 11 times faster.
There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
If you meet him some day, and you think this stuff is worth it, buy him a beer.
If I have seen further it is by stealing the Intellectual Property of giants.
Do you really need 3277MB of my RAM?
:p
Firefox 1.0 programmer I assume...
Laziness?
Come on, it's Slashdot!
Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
He's one of the top three UNIX gurus in the entire world. In fact, the Internet today is what it is thanks to his hard work and dedication.
Still, I'd trust Don Knuth over Poul-Henning any day--at least Knuth can spell his own first name correctly.
I forget the exact amount, but it was like PI or E dollars for every typo. I am not sure what the payment is for an algorithmic error.
I think it's e ^i(pi/2)
What's with this retarded, inflammatory and incorrect summary? Oh right, it was kdawson.
Dear slashdot,
Please fire kdawson and hire someone who's less of a muck-raker to edit your summaries.
Thanks.
What is this? The freaking tautology hour?
non-sensationalized takeaway: "remember swap is slow; try not to use it."
Not really. Closer to "Remember, swap is slow. Think about how you use it."
"Your response has exactly the same length as the parent's quote. Interesting"