Slashdot Mirror


NASA Warns of Potential "Huge Space Storm" In 2013

Low Ranked Craig writes "Senior space agency scientists believe the Earth will be hit with unprecedented levels of magnetic energy from solar flares after the Sun wakes 'from a deep slumber' sometime around 2013. In a new warning, NASA said the super storm could hit like 'a bolt of lightning' and could cause catastrophic consequences for the world's health, emergency services, and national security — unless precautions are taken. Scientists believe damage could extend to everyday items such as home computers, iPods, and sat navs. 'We know it is coming but we don't know how bad it is going to be,' said Dr. Richard Fisher, the director of NASA's Heliophysics division. 'I believe we're on the threshold of a new era in which space weather can be as influential in our daily lives as ordinary terrestrial weather.' Fisher concludes. 'We take this very seriously indeed.'"

66 of 464 comments (clear)

  1. Around 2013 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Around 2013? So what, maybe December 2012...

    1. Re:Around 2013 by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Protip: If TFA is found on the "telegraph.co.uk" domain, it almost certainly represents the state of knowledge of someone who majored in "journalism", after surviving an editor, rather than the state of knowledge of the actual scientists involved with the question...

    2. Re:Around 2013 by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Funny

      after the Sun wakes 'from a deep slumber' sometime around 2013

      I think they're saying exactly December 21, 2012, the Winter Solstice and end of the thirteenth b'ak'tun, the ending of the Great Year, the Age of Pisces, the Platonic Cycle, Barack Obama's first term.

      I'm convinced that there are a lot of powerful (and not so powerful) interests are using "2012" as a tabula rasa onto which to draw their agendas. And I'm not just talking about crazy new agers.

      The US intelligence service has been toying with manipulating belief systems since the end of WWII. They've looked at (and maybe used) the UFO phenomena, Egyptian mysticism, Christianity, parapsychology and of course, psychotropic drugs as ways to influence events around the world and here at home. I'm not saying they believe in these things, but that they believe they can use these things, or rather, that they can manipulate other peoples' belief in these things. MK-ULTRA, Project Monarch, astrology, Andrija Puharich and the "Council of Nine" (involving Arthur M. Young of Bell Helicopters and Lee Harvey Oswald's wife by the way) were some nascent efforts in this area, and "2012" may be their pièce de résistance.

      There's just something that feels to me really manipulative about all this "2012" mishegas.

      [I just realized I quoted Latin, French and Yiddish in this post, which while not my record, is pretty good for 8 o'clock on a tuesday morning.]

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    3. Re:Around 2013 by vtcodger · · Score: 3, Informative

      More likely a result of bad journalism than bad science, but I suppose it could be both.

      Anyway, here's the link to spaceweather.com for anyone who wants to learn a little about the sun, sunspots, etc. http://www.spaceweather.com/

      Here's a link to the latest from NASA published about two weeks ago. Their take on sunspot cycle 24 as best I can translate it? They haven't a clue and won't for several years -- after they have a decent sampling of cycle 24 sunspots to work with. Right now the cycle is late to start and may be fairly weak ... or not. http://solarscience.msfc.nasa.gov/predict.shtml

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
  2. Mayans only off by a few months. by DigitalReverend · · Score: 3, Funny

    That IS impressive.

    --
    I read Slashdot for the headlines, because the headlines, unlike the articles, are usually original and never duplicated
    1. Re:Mayans only off by a few months. by Splab · · Score: 2, Funny

      Technically they can still be proven correct, no one knows when the suns next big fart is coming up (the shiny one, not the paper version, they shit crap out all the time :D - and are probably an even greater danger to society)

  3. Invest in FRDY! by noidentity · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I seriously wonder whether I should purchase a few crate-sized Farady cages in preparation, and ensure I have non-magnetic backups of everything.

    1. Re:Invest in FRDY! by capnchicken · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Non-magnetic? Like what? Writable CD-R's are only good for about two years. (not snarky, just curious)

      --
      A libertarian shat on my carpet once. Claimed the free market would sort it out. -Ford Prefect(8777)
    2. Re:Invest in FRDY! by daid303 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Flash disks are non-magnetic. But if you want something that survives better then I suggest something like engravings on stone tablets.

    3. Re:Invest in FRDY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Number-memorizing Chinese people have been known to survive well. Unless they work for Foxconn, that is.

    4. Re:Invest in FRDY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Unless you have a punchcard to jtag writer, documentation on your cd-rom drive, and of course backups of your bios, you're screwed anyways. Every electronic component you'd use to recover those backups probably has either an eeprom or flash part in it containing the device specific code. In the event of any sort of serious EM pulse that could damage hardware or wipe software you would either have lost or best case had minimally corrupted every device along the chain you'd use for recovery. This actually falls in under 'reasons to have blueprints for your hardware'... if the software were to disappear tomorrow, who would be able to reimplement it in order to help recover all that now-dead hardware?

    5. Re:Invest in FRDY! by vlm · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Also, my computer is pretty much a large steel cage, with the magnetic platters encased in another thick layer of metal, how vulnerable would a regular tower be?

      Simultaneously plugged into a multi-thousand mile grid of copper electrical power wiring and miles of aluminum hardline for the cablemodem, not so good.

      Unplugged in a box, excellent chance of survival.

      Also, electrical fields have no direct effect on magnetic material, you can completely vaporize the electronic of a computer in a lightning strike and a cleanroom service can install new circuit boards and recover most/all of the data off the drive. Now, heat the platters above the curie temperature, like in a fire, and you're screwed.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    6. Re:Invest in FRDY! by DerekLyons · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And even if you have all that stuff - what about the tools to make the tools? Having all the documentation/drawings/plans/specifications/whatever to rebuild the reader for the media you've stored away is pretty much meaningless unless you can actually use all that data to actually build the reader.... And that equipment isn't trivial either.
       
      And it goes like that right down the technological chain. As I told a misguided survivalist type friend of mine back during the run-up to Y2k: "Living off the grid is easy, living without FedEx is the real bitch".

  4. Re:Scary by ThinkWeak · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So would something like an EMP destroy pace makers, artificial hearts, etc.? I know the typical discussion is in regards to someone not being able to listen to their Jason Mraz album on their iPod, but would something like this essentially kill anyone with an artificial/bionic enhancement that controls life support?

  5. Michael Bay it! by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 2, Funny

    Send a rag-tag bunch of misfit ex-astronauts in space with an atomic bomb to place at the center of the storm, to create "a sort of firecracker in closed fist effect", YEEEEEEE-HAW!!!

  6. They should hire better PR. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If they had said it was coming in 2012 it would have generated way more publicity!

  7. I still have my Y2K food by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh, good... I was worried that I'd have to throw out all that canned Y2K food that I have in my basement bunker. (actually, it's technically my mom's basement)

  8. hmm by davidmcg · · Score: 3, Informative

    Doesn't worry me seeing as we won't survive 2012 anyway.

  9. TFA. by bbqsrc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you RTFA, it's not a world ending event. It's just gonna mess up some transformers if they don't turn them off in time.

    --
    Disagree != mod troll.
    1. Re:TFA. by Culture20 · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you RTFA, it's not a world ending event. It's just gonna mess up some transformers if they don't turn them off in time.

      But will it be more likely to turn Autobots into Decepticons or the other way around? It's an important distinction!

  10. home computers, iPods, and sat navs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "home computers, iPods, and sat navs"
    Why not "Macs, iPods and Garmins"?

    1. Re:home computers, iPods, and sat navs by Vectormatic · · Score: 4, Funny

      because apparently the only PMP's affected will be ipods..

      No EMP resistance, less space then a nomad, lame

      --
      People, what a bunch of bastards
    2. Re:home computers, iPods, and sat navs by ProppaT · · Score: 3, Funny

      You people laugh at my Zune now....but, you'll see!

      --
      Wise men say, "Forgiveness is divine, but never pay full price for late pizza."
  11. sure, sure. by Banichi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You can't plot the weather here on Earth more than 3 days from now accurately, but you expect us to believe you can plot the sun's weather 2 years from now?

    I call BS.

    1. Re:sure, sure. by TheKidWho · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Are you an astrophysicist?

      I'm going to assume you aren't. If so, wtf makes you think anyone is going to take your BS accusation seriously?

      I call BS on your BS.

    2. Re:sure, sure. by Mr_Plattz · · Score: 2

      Calling BS on BS doesn't make the initial statement true.

    3. Re:sure, sure. by __aarvde6843 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It is common knowledge the sun has seasons, like the hearth. But they take 11 years to cycle.

      With statistical analysis and observations, it is very well possible to make an educated guess...

    4. Re:sure, sure. by Fess_Longhair · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You can't plot the weather here on Earth more than 3 days from now accurately, but you expect us to believe you can plot the sun's weather 2 years from now?

      I call BS.

      We know arbitrarily far in advance that winter is colder on average than summer. Similarly, we can forecast the timing of solar-cycle peaks pretty well out into the future. I.e, this forecast based on climatology, not an initial value problem (weather; chaotic).

    5. Re: sure, sure. by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You can't plot the weather here on Earth more than 3 days from now accurately

      But you can easily predict that next summer will be warmer than next winter.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    6. Re:sure, sure. by moosesocks · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Physicist here (not an astro-, but good enough for these purposes).

      Solar activity generally occurs in cycles. As far as we know and have observed, these cycles are fairly regular and predictable in a "big-picture" sort of way.

      Although I might not trust the weatherman's forecast for this Friday, I will trust his assertion that it's going to start getting cold around November.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    7. Re:sure, sure. by blair1q · · Score: 2, Funny

      The current lull in sunspot activity is caused by Global Warming.

    8. Re:sure, sure. by lawpoop · · Score: 2, Funny

      It is common knowledge the sun has seasons, like the hearth. But they take 11 years to cycle.

      Yeah. my hearth is cold in the summer, and warm in the winter.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
  12. Like we are not scared enough by dragisha · · Score: 3, Insightful

    With influenza pandemy, Maya's calendar doomsday, $|€ crisis, oil spills, earthquakes...

    Or NASa just saw the light and how public fear can me made into profit, using for example big pharma recipes...?

    Whatever, only reasonable thing to do about it is to cool down and ignore as much as we can.

    --
    http://opencm3.net, http://www.nongnu.org/gm2/
    1. Re:Like we are not scared enough by dominious · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Really? you mod this insightful?? Modders, read the replies.

    2. Re:Like we are not scared enough by diewlasing · · Score: 2, Interesting

      With influenza pandemy, Maya's calendar doomsday, $|€ crisis, oil spills, earthquakes...

      Or NASa just saw the light and how public fear can me made into profit, using for example big pharma recipes...?

      Whatever, only reasonable thing to do about it is to cool down and ignore as much as we can.

      I don't get it. I mean I don't get why you were modded up. I myself might get modded down for saying this, but the quality of modding has gone down here on /.

      Are you suggesting NASA is trying to scare us for profit? Are you bloody serious? If you took the time to read the literature, solar storms happen with a roughly well determined periodicity. No one is suggesting this is a world-ender but electronics are at risk; to just ignore it as a NASA conspiracy is amazingly irresponsible and completely ignorant.

  13. Good thing we dont have Electric Cars yet by Culture20 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd hate to see what would happen if all our energy usage was electric instead of burning stuff.

    1. Re:Good thing we dont have Electric Cars yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      If there's an EMP-level event from the Sun, any cars made since about 1970 will be rendered inoperable.

      Good, my 1968 muscle car will still work. And since everyone else's cars will be dead, there'll be plenty of cheap gas and I won't care that it only gets 9MPG.

    2. Re:Good thing we dont have Electric Cars yet by vlm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It doesn't matter, we have electronic controls everywhere. If there's an EMP-level event from the Sun, any cars made since about 1970 will be rendered inoperable.

      Why? The electronics are buried in fully enclosed little steel boxes, installed in big car sized fully enclosed steel boxes, with short wires designed not just to survive electrical sparks, but to control those electrical sparks. And none of the electrical wires are longer than a couple meters at most, and none of them connect outside the vehicle (the occasional winter time engine block heater excepted). The only things tougher than automotive electronics are diesel electric locomotive electronics and military electronics.

      I suppose you're referring to the way high power broadcast transmitter antennas, military search radars, and airport radars are always surrounded by dead cars with blown computers. Oh wait, that never happens.

      Also, what was added to cars in 1970? Tailfins? My old '87 plymouth horizon would "run" without its ECU computer, of course it would never take the computerized choke off and the engine timing advance would not "advance" so performance was remarkably poor, but for a young kid, it got me around. That was manufactured about 17 years after your arbitrary cutoff date.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    3. Re:Good thing we dont have Electric Cars yet by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2, Funny

      Good, my 1968 muscle car will still work. And since everyone else's cars will be dead, there'll be plenty of cheap gas and I won't care that it only gets 9MPG.

      That and you'll get more 'muscle' by pumping the gas out of the station's underground tank by hand. Bring cash.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    4. Re:Good thing we dont have Electric Cars yet by molo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Example of high power broadcast transmitters surrounded by dead cars:

      http://wcbstv.com/watercooler/empire.state.building.2.641521.html

      The good news is that they tow them a few blocks and it works again.

      -molo

      --
      Using your sig line to advertise for friends is lame.
  14. Countermesures anyone? by gorg1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From one of the links we learn that "..powergrids will temporary switch off some transformers, to save them from the effects..".
    What about our computers? Anyone here able to confirm that powered off electronics would not be damaged by the blast?

    1. Re:Countermesures anyone? by FTWinston · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The effect is proportional to length of wire. We're talking about a hypothetical major solar event, potentially comparable to the one in 1859. As the effect will be proportional to the length of the conductor in question, the effect on your ~1m PC will be ~1000 times less than the effect on a ~1km power cable.

  15. Re:Scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    So would something like an EMP destroy pace makers, artificial hearts, etc.? I know the typical discussion is in regards to someone not being able to listen to their Jason Mraz album on their iPod, but would something like this essentially kill anyone with an artificial/bionic enhancement that controls life support?

    No. My titanium ribs act as a Faraday Cage and protect my electronic innards. So after the disaster happens.... I'LL BE BACK.

  16. Why should we expect a worse sun spot maximum? by CdXiminez · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why should we expect a worse sun spot maximum than previous maxima?
    Nowhere in the two linked articles does it say anything about why it would be worse than 2006.
    They don't even talk about the unusually long sun spot miminum we've had.
    I was hoping for some science about how that might affect the coming maximum...

    1. Re:Why should we expect a worse sun spot maximum? by Abcd1234 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ugh, ignore the fucking Telegraph article, it's a piece of shit.

      The NASA article makes no claim that this solar maximum will be any worse than previous ones. Their point is that, due to the deep penetration of technology in our lives, our society is more sensitive than ever to peak solar activity, and so solar weather forecasting is now more important than ever.

  17. Government thinking writ large: by Rogerborg · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The National Risk Register, established in 2008 to identify different dangers to Britain, also has "comprehensive" plans on how to handle a complete outage of electricity supplies.

    Yes, secret plans. Don't worry, when we need to know, they'll be disseminated, presumably by a network of tin cans and bits of string, with a smoke signal backup system.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  18. Telegraph sensationalized stories by Fractal+Dice · · Score: 4, Informative

    Does it seem to anyone else that the telegraph routinely confuses "Something up to size X could hypothetically happen some day" with "X IS ABOUT TO HAPPEN!!!!"?

    I'm not saying this is a bad topic to have a conversation about (in fact it's one of my favorite disaster scenarios to rant about), it's just that if slashdot is going to reference the telegraph, it should frame it as though a new Hollywood disaster movie has been released, not as though it was an actual news item was printed.

  19. Fantastic Four? by dsvick · · Score: 2, Funny

    Will anyone staying on the ISS at the time turn into the Fantastic Four?

  20. Re:EOTW? by yotto · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually a "Generation" is typically 20-25 years. However, today's electronics are a pretty big advance from those of the late 80s.

    I just had a thought, wouldn't it be odd if the only space ships that weathered the space storm were the Shuttles? :o

  21. Re:Scary by vlm · · Score: 5, Informative

    So would something like an EMP destroy pace makers

    Pacemakers are installed inside a poorly constructed Faraday cage. That being your highly conductive body. Pacemakers historically have occasionally gotten all wound up in high RF fields, but aside from folks working at high power UHF TV station transmitters it has not been a serious issue.

    You can "short out" and essentially blow the fuses of a pacemaker. Of course it takes more than enough power to hopelessly electrocute someone, in fact depending on the design you pretty much need to cook them like one of those electric hot dog cookers.

    Its pretty much the usual useless scaremongering B.S.

    would something like this essentially kill anyone with an artificial/bionic enhancement that controls life support?

    Could something worse than we have ever experienced, result in deaths? Just speaking generally, not about any specific threat, and taking a wild guess, I'd say that's a good solid maybe, unless my salary depending on raising money by saying yes, in which case I'd say yes.

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
  22. Re:EOTW? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2, Informative

    Working on the assumption that, in the contemporary west, "generation" means ~25 years, there have been pretty enormous changes in that time. In '85, a 386 fabbed on a 1.5 micrometer process was seriously exciting stuff. In 1960, the transistor was only 13 years old, and seriously retro(but electromagnetically robust) stuff like magnetic core memory was still standard. There were plenty of electric gadgets, though.

  23. Re:Scary by FTWinston · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Big transformers in the power grids will be the main victims. And all of us that rely on having a power grid, of course.
    As long as you keep a spare car battery to recharge any bionics that require that, and provided that the outage doesn't last too long, I'd expect something like a pacemaker to be just fine.
    GPS and cars are mentioned because its the satellites themselves that are vulnerable. The "ipods etc" stuff in the telegraph, assuming there's any reasoning behind their inclusion in the article at all, beyond scaring telegraph readers, will be just because they need recharged regularly.

    What the actual NASA article boils down to is: if the satellite and power companies (disconnecting transformers, etc) react fast enough, we'll be fine. Otherwise, better make sure you have an exercise bike and a car battery handy. And, potentially, access to locally grown food. I'd rather not see how the urban supply chain holds up without the power grid.

  24. Re:Scary by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Big transformers in the power grids will be the main victims.

    OMG... Won't someone think of the Decepticons!?!

    --
    Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
  25. Re:Scary by FTWinston · · Score: 2, Informative

    Dood, when decepticons get at a working power grid, it quickly stops being a working power grid.

  26. Re:Scary by sortius_nod · · Score: 4, Informative

    I seem to recall that the 1859 solar storm caused the telegraph (the service not the trashy paper) network to run without batteries for some time after it.

    Who knows, maybe this will trigger new science for harnessing solar flares/space storms.

  27. Re:Scary by FTWinston · · Score: 3, Informative

    It also caught fire.

  28. Re:Scary by quenda · · Score: 5, Funny

    This morning's unprecedented solar eclipse - Is no cause for alarm ... Only Doctor Hans Zarkov formerly at NASA - Has provided any explanation

    Flash will save us all. Except for iPhone/Pad users.

  29. Re:Scary by Bakkster · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Big transformers in the power grids will be the main victims. And all of us that rely on having a power grid, of course. As long as you keep a spare car battery to recharge any bionics that require that, and provided that the outage doesn't last too long, I'd expect something like a pacemaker to be just fine.

    The issue you refer is to ground loop currents in the electric grid. The storm creates a difference in the ground voltage between different transformers. This creates a massive current that blows out the transformer.

    The real issue is that the devices to prevent this (basically huge resistors) are expensive, rare, and take a long time to manufacture. And when we suddenly have half of the transformers in the US explode at once, the outage will not be brief. There is not a large stock of transformers sitting in warehouses as replacements. Transformers take even longer to produce than those resistors, and we would be waiting months before we could repair most of the grid. That's a huge issue.

    --
    Write your representatives! Repeal the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!
  30. Re:Scary by robthebloke · · Score: 5, Funny

    You must be the oldest person on slashdot!

  31. Re:Scary by vlm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    grocery distribution

    You're looking at it from a consumer perspective. The real problem is infrastructure.

    I can buy a remarkable quantity and variety of food at my local weekly farmers market direct from the local farmers... I would assume that could scale up quite a bit if necessary.

    I'm not belittling the other problems, just saying that is possible to buy food, in fact excellent locally grown food, beyond pizza rolls from a walmart supercenter. I/we can eat quite well indeed without making sam walton's heirs richer, or making the new york banks richer by swiping a VISA card.

    I would agree that coasties in the heart of big cities and desert dwellers in AZ would pretty much have to starve to death. But the quality of life is already so low in such areas, can you be surprised at the results if an EMP dropped the QOL even further? Not really.

    Most of the population has zero/negative net worth, with only 1% or so having almost all the money. Frankly a financial reboot would probably do a lot of good for the country. This coming from a guy who's doing pretty good although not quite in the 1% yet.

    The problem you're not seeing is infrastructure. No electricity rapidly means no plumbed treated tap water. The good news is I live in a river community. The bad news is the communities upstream have no electricity to run their sewage treatment plans. Pestilence and disease is going to be the big problem.

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
  32. Re:Scary by skuzzlebutt · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's Apple's own fault for rejecting Flash.

    --
    My debut novel AMITY now available: http://jeremydbrooks.c
  33. Re:Scary by sleeping143 · · Score: 2

    ...but Dec21,2012, is a little too close to the end of a long solar slumber to be completely ignored.

    I disagree, I'm not having any trouble ignoring it at all.

  34. Re:Scary by imakemusic · · Score: 2, Informative

    Weapons of Mass Destruction by Hive? Here you go.

    --
    Brain surgery - it's not rocket science!
  35. Re:Scary by cusco · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually the electrical utilities were looking at stockpiling backup transformers, worried about roving bands of Al Qaeda or Neo-Nazi terrorists shooting up substations with deer rifles. The powers-that-be took one look at the price tag, saw their quarterly bonuses and yearly stock options evaporating, and nixed any sort of actual anti-terrorist preparation that went beyond window dressing. The reasoning seemed to be that if an attack caught them unprepared they'd just be fired and take their millions with them, but if they spent enough money to put a dent in the stock price they'd be out some serious money.

    Disaster preparedness; just another victim of the MBA disease.

    --
    "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  36. Re:Scary by Bakkster · · Score: 2, Informative

    I appologize, I misremembered the values, and finally found the article again.

    There are 5,000 transformers that need the resistors, and they would cost about $40k each. In the grand scheme of things, pretty cheap.

    --
    Write your representatives! Repeal the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!
  37. Re:Scary by Bakkster · · Score: 2, Informative

    Nope (I'm an EE), I really do mean dishwasher-sized ohmic resistor.

    The power transmission is three-phase power. So, at the common terminal of the transformer on each end of a long transmission line there should be zero net current. Under all normal circumstances there is.

    In the event of a solar storm, there is a DC current flowing through the wire, which usually isn't present. This resistor would go between the common terminal and earth ground, and both reduce the current present in the line and dissipate the power. See this picture.

    --
    Write your representatives! Repeal the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!