Slashdot Mirror


Chatroulette Working On Genital Recognition Algorithm

Show them while you can, Internet exhibitionists. Chatroulette is working on image-recognition software that will filter out shots of male genitalia. The website's founder, Andrey Ternovskiy, hopes that blocking the offending members will help clean up Chatroulette's reputation. He's even enlisted the help of Napster founder Shawn Fanning. I wonder if someone has told Andrey how well it went for Napster?

12 of 364 comments (clear)

  1. a democratic solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    odds are the penis bandits are frequent offenders. let the community flag them for you. once an IP has been flagged enough times, ban them.

    crowd source it, let the people decide.

    gotta be easier than penis recognition software.

  2. But... but... by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What about the people who want to look at boners? Won't somebody please think of the perverts?!

    Though really this is an opportunity waiting to be snatched up. Chatroulette has demonstrated that there is a huge userbase just waiting to wave their willies on camera, so all somebody need do is create software that does something similar, and then make it known that 'this is the new place to flash people on teh intarwebs!' and BOOM instant userbase (= MONAY).

    If I weren't so lazy I'd do it myself.

    --
    I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
  3. Hope this works by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When I first heard about Chatroulette, I thought "what a cool idea?" Then, when I heard about how many sickos are wanking and flashing wiener, that killed it for me. I don't think this algorithm will work, but if they can figure something out before they get branded as that "cock flashing website" they'll probably bring in more prudish people like me.

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  4. Re:Really... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    That could work but only if done like Slashdot were moderators have to prove themselves or they don't get to moderate. Otherwise the people themselves become the trolls (see: Digg)

  5. Re:Suddenly... by TheLink · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually you don't have to block or drop them. If the genital recognition algorithm works, you could just link those users to a video/chatbot that laughs at them. Of course it won't work so well if they drop their pants right in the middle of a session with a real human, but you could still automatically switch quickly to the "chatbot" after that.

    But I thought people that go to chatroulette should be expecting crap like this and worse? I haven't bothered since I don't have a webcam, nor do I want to risk seeing some yucky stuff.

    FWIW, I doubt seeing some genitals would bother me. As long as they're not mangled/bloody or gross in some other way. Maybe they should have something that recognizes Goatse and worse stuff, that'll be more useful (though a lot more challenging :) ).

    --
  6. Posting anonymously for obvious reasons... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ...But jerking off on Chatroulette is actually really fun. It might take a hundred "nexts" to find the one room full of sexy college girls who want to see you jerk off ... but when you do, it's really hot. I can only imagine how satisfying it would be to be a gay guy and to be able to find an anonymous wanking parter in about 3 or 4 clicks.

    1. Re:Posting anonymously for obvious reasons... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I have found female finger partners on Chatroulette many times, which always lead to a really fun filled time.

  7. Re:So... the only problem is the penis? by jfengel · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't have any perfect solutions, but I'd say a radically different way of solving the problem would be to make people pay for it, even a small amount.

    If you catch misbehavior, you boot them without refund. And refuse to accept that credit card account as payment again. It doesn't eliminate the trolls, but it makes it harder. (It also helps pay for the fact that you need staff to review troll reports, and since that job involves looking at trolls all day...)

    There's also a Slashdot-esque solution, separating the anons from the newbies from the people who have earned reputations. Let people set the level at which they choose to browse.

    Added to all this an automatic "I can tell you're trolling" detector might save some grief (people might get trolled and not report it, letting the troll go on), but they're going to need more than that.

  8. Re:So... the only problem is the penis? by Merls+the+Sneaky · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What they need is a rating system, like /. The trolls still troll, but the amount of people exposed to the troll is greatly reduced and it ruins most of their fun. Sure they can continue to use it, but you could redirect them to other random trolls. That way all the trolls get to look at each others cocks, and people who aren't that interested in cock will get to the people they want to interact with faster.

  9. this is an extremely difficult problem by Michael+Kristopeit · · Score: 3, Interesting

    i did a general pornography detection filter as a final project in an image processing class my senior year of undergraduate college... their best hope is around 90% detection with ~15% false positives. for the applications i was shooting for, that wasn't acceptable... for chatroulette, it might be, but even at 95% you're still getting 1/20th of the dicks. if most people on the network are dicks, that might still mean getting a dick almost every time. might as well just start selling boner pills and embrace your market rather than attempt to squash it.

  10. What about blur time? by gringer · · Score: 1, Interesting

    How about letting people view whatever they want, but if most other people don't want to see it, someone needs to wait a bit longer to see it. My idea is the following:

    * Each user has an associated 'blur time', which is the amount of time before the picture will be completely visible with no distortion
    * When a user is encountered, the distortion starts at something large, and ramps down until zero at the blur time
    * The blur time is a function of the time taken for people to change to another user -- if they change before blur time is over (or shortly after blur time is over), then the blur time is increased, otherwise blur time is reduced
    * Blur time is capped at a particular time, say 10s

    So if people really want to see everything, they just need to wait 10s after each change.

    --
    Ask me about repetitive DNA
  11. Re:Suddenly... by Gaygirlie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's probably more to do with the looks of the person: I'd sell my grandma if I could get to look at Jason Statham naked, but seeing a 40+ year old greasy, fat, untidy dirty pig over a poor webcam picture showing off his genitals really isn't something I'd dream of.

    Besides, a healthy view of the world, clever sense of humour and the ability to actually discuss all things maturely is a lot more attractive than a penis of any size or quality.