Slashdot Mirror


Best Places To Work In IT 2010

CWmike writes "These top-rated IT workplaces combine choice benefits with hot technologies and on-target training. Computerworld's 17th annual report highlights the employers firing on all cylinders. The Employer Scorecard ranks IT firms based on best benefits, retention, training, diversity, and career development. Also read what IT staffs have to say about job satisfaction. How's your workplace, IT folk?" Read below for a quick look at the top 10 IT workplaces according to this survey.
1. USAA; 2. Booz Allen Hamilton Inc.; 3. JM Family Enterprises Inc.; 4. General Mills Inc.; 5. University of Pennsylvania; 6. SAS Institute Inc.; 7. Quicken Loans Inc.; 8. Verizon Wireless; 9. Securian Financial Group Inc.; 10. Salesforce.com Inc.

10 of 205 comments (clear)

  1. missing from the list by mentil · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Independent contractor

    --
    Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
  2. Norton Healthcare by ArbitraryDescriptor · · Score: 5, Funny

    Pro: IT Staff is 75% Female

    Con: 66% of IT Staff also claimed to be Night Elves

  3. Re:Outside the US? by bendodge · · Score: 4, Funny

    (There doesn't appear to be a right answer here, so I'll go for vaguely funny.) Those of us in the US wonder why you're such a grouch?

    --
    The government can't save you.
  4. Bullshit criteria by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Wow - the biggest criteria of them all - typical salary - isn't even on the list.

    I'd rather have a lot more bucks and crappy benefits than a bunch of 'great' benefits which I may never even use but also serve to tie employees to the employer and reduce upward career mobility.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  5. Bad places to work by girlintraining · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I worked at a company that was in the top 50 on the Fortune 500. They were renowned for their tolerance and diversity. I was fired from that place for being gay. Don't believe everything you read, folks. The best places to work won't be found through survey questions; The best place to work, is a place you can respect and that respects you.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:Bad places to work by Aceticon · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I've been working as a freelancer in IT for large banks in London for a couple of years now and all of them have Charity programs.

      The common thing to all those programs is that employees are expected to donate their own personal time and/or money to make the company look good. I have yet to see one in which the company donated worker-hours to charity.

      It's all PR on the cheap: that's the way they work.

      Thus I'm not at all surprised when their "Diversity" programs tend to really be about projecting an image of "forward thinking and hip" to attract young (and easilly impressed) employees and pre-emptivelly avoid anti-discrimination laws and lawsuits, not about being inclusive.

    2. Re:Bad places to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes, companies fire people for being gay so they can get sued. I'm also really really sure that your statement with zero context is 100% factually correct.

      Sexual orientation is not a protected class in most states, and there is no federal statute, so you can't sue for being fired for being gay.

  6. Re:Bullshit by Antony+T+Curtis · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wouldn't say that their infrastructure IT staff are miserable.

    Overworked, maybe... Often frustrated... Over-ambitious but unable to effect change, frequently.
    Occasionally awakened by their pager, repeatedly, from 3am for the 4th night in a row.... Been there.
    But I wouldn't ever use the word miserable.

    (Former Google SRE)

    --
    No sig. Move along - nothing to see here.
  7. Opinion from 15 years on the field, 10 companies by Aceticon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've been working in IT as a Software Developer for 15 years now, worked for 10 companies in 3 different countries (i've been a freelancer/contractor for the last 7 years) and across 4 different industries (IT Services, IT Products, Finance, Publishing)

    I can tell you that, if you're a really gifted Software Developer in the beginning of your career, the best places to work don't even appear in these surveys:
    - In my experience, the best place to start in IT as a Software Developer is a small IT consultancy

    In big companies, bureaucracy is rife and mind-numbing - things like getting access to a development Linux machine for example can take from several days (if all you need is an account on an existing machine) to months (if you need a new machine). In a small company you can set-up your own machine (dual boot ur desktop: no prob) or just have a chat with you friendly local sysadmin (often another developer) to get access to one - in a big company you have to fill-in one or more request forms and if it's only getting a new account in an existing machine if you're lucky it will end up in the queue for some guy in India to do at the end of the following week.

    In small companies, if you're good you'll be noticed (you're not just another number in a ledger) and they'll give you all kinds of challenging stuff to do - in the beginning of your career this is the fastest way to get exposures to all kinds of technologies. In a large company you're stuck in a corner doing a limited number of things, probably working on an existing, long lived system, whose only educational value is to be an example of how not to design/code software and you won't easilly become known in other teams as being a really good coder and thus getting a chance to work on other systems.

    Working in an IT company is better that in a non-IT one for a very simple reason:
    - In an IT company (especially services) you are in a profit-centre: the group you are in contributes directly or in a very straightforward way to the company's revenues and profit. They'll be a lot more keen on best practices (including such basic ones as promoting code reuse) and actual development processes (for example Agile) usually with a much beter approach to preparing for a project before coding even starts.
    - In a non-IT company you're in a cost-centre: the group you are in costs money and does not visibly contribute to the company's bottom line. There will much less emphasys in optimizing the software development process (since it's results are not as easy to measure) and, especially in large companies, you are much less likelly to find widespread code-reuse programs or any kind of formal or semi-formal software development process (large company's CTOs are often promoted from infrastructure groups - i.e. setting up networks, installing systems - or the business, and are better know for their self-promotion or golfing skills than for their strategic approach to IT).

    As for the difference between IT Products and IT Services companies, the former just have a much smaller variance of technologies you might be exposed to (since they concentrate on a couple of products) while the later, having many projects for many client will have a lot more opportunities for learning new technologies.

    I strongly advise you to keep away from large well know IT Consultancies since:
    - They're sweat shops
    - They outsource most of the low level work to India and as an entry level developer you will end up doing only local installation/maintenance tasks (that cannot be outsourced) and/or being trained as a Consultant (which is more of salesman than a techie).

  8. What are those "best benefits"? by LordKronos · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When I read that the University of Pennsylvania has the best benefit, I said "oh really? like what?". So I went to look further. Does it say anything about typical salary? Nope. Vacation time? Nope. Retirement account (401a,403b) matching? Nope. Anything about how good their health insurance is? Nope. Do they offer free tuition for my family? It doesn't say. This article just says "best benefits" and then offers absolutely zero explanation of exactly why it got that ranking (other than mentioning free tuition for career related course, which is the norm for almost any college or university).