Slashdot Mirror


China Restricts Minors From Using Virtual Currency

eldavojohn writes "For those under eighteen who play video games in China, life just got a little harder. Not only is gold farming illegal, but starting August 1, virtual currency platform makers are expected to put in safeties that prohibit underage players from using virtual currencies — because doing such a thing might promote 'unwholesome' behavior. The new regulations explicitly 'forbid content advocating pornography, cults, superstitions, gambling, and violence in all online games.' The business papers are picking it up as a number of stocks from companies like Tencent Holdings — which is heavily based in virtual currency in China — fell about 5%, though the company said that the ban on minors will not affect it."

142 comments

  1. unwholesome behavior by ravenspear · · Score: 1

    All the minors need to do to see that is to look at that state's example of systematically denying them access to information about how they are being oppressed.

    1. Re:unwholesome behavior by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Uh huh, yeah, sure. After all, the young rising up against the system works so well in western democracies where they have full access to information and the right to protest, so I'm sure it'll work just fine in an authoritarian state like China.

    2. Re:unwholesome behavior by HungryHobo · · Score: 1

      All I know is that games of monopoly are going to be pretty in china.

      Are barter systems still ok?

    3. Re:unwholesome behavior by CarpetShark · · Score: 1, Interesting

      information about how they are being oppressed.

      And yet, if it was an american parent making those decisions for their children, we might applaud them as more responsible than the average parent who lets their kid get up to anything online, unmonitored.

      Let's stop demonising one of the oldest, and traditionally if not currently most advanced civilisations in the world, OK? Yes, they make some poor decisions. Are they evil, or completely misguided compared to the western cultures where kids are running into schools and shooting their classmates before shooting themselves? Perhaps not.

    4. Re:unwholesome behavior by icebraining · · Score: 1

      I thought the Ken State shooting had a strong effect in public opinion?

    5. Re:unwholesome behavior by masterzora · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And yet, if it was an american parent making those decisions for their children, we might applaud them as more responsible than the average parent who lets their kid get up to anything online, unmonitored.

      There is a stark difference between a parent setting such rules for their children and a state doing it on their behalf, and to suggest otherwise is disingenuous at best.

      --
      Remember, open source is free as in speech, not free as in bear.
    6. Re:unwholesome behavior by Thinboy00 · · Score: 1

      Well said sir!

      Acting as a surrogate parent is never the state's business. Even if a child loses his/her real parents, the state's only responsibility is to find foster parents.

      --
      $ make available
    7. Re:unwholesome behavior by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The difference between the state and the family is not so clear-cut. The family was the "first" state, and to this day, it can be seen as a "delegee" of the state, fulfilling certain expectations - and losing its privileges to act as a family if they fail to do so. We have, in the West, grown accustomed to a number of stark distinctions - between family and state, between the political and the economic, between the civil and the religious/philosophical - that do not apply in other cultures, and do not really stand up to deep scrutiny in our own.

    8. Re:unwholesome behavior by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

      We have, in the West, grown accustomed to a number of stark distinctions - between family and state, between the political and the economic, between the civil and the religious/philosophical - that do not apply in other cultures, and do not really stand up to deep scrutiny in our own.

      Exactly. I'm reminded of the Vietnamese finding "Uncle Ho" a much more likeable and believable pretender for the crown than the cold, Western-like South Vietnamese President Ngo Dinh Diem.

    9. Re:unwholesome behavior by CarpetShark · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is a stark difference between a parent setting such rules for their children and a state doing it on their behalf

      No, you just like to imagine there's a stark difference. There's a lot of gray area and general governmental complexity, but as other commenters have explained in other ways, the distinction isn't so clear at all. What it all boils down to is that government is an extension of family values; that government is essentially expected to create the kind of society that families want their kids to grow up in.

    10. Re:unwholesome behavior by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you really shouldn't try to differentiate Western and Chinese civilizations right now based on how many school shootings their have been, considering the crazy wave of machete assaults on school children in china over the last few months. They must be going for some sort of high score.

    11. Re:unwholesome behavior by mqduck · · Score: 1

      All the minors need to do to see that is to look at that state's example of systematically denying them access to information about how they are being oppressed.

      All they need to do is look at that, and...? And then they'll get ice cream? Or, and then the underage nerds of China will rise up and lead a liberal revolution? Or, and then they'll make the point to their lawmakers that they feel that the censorship is worse than what it's censoring, causing those lawmakers to resign in shame?

      --
      Property is theft.
    12. Re:unwholesome behavior by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

      You raise a fair point, but I was specifically referring to schoolchildren killing classmates due to societal pressures, not to the varied attacks that have SOMEHOW been related to schools in countries with huge populations. A crime of passion between and adult schoolteacher and an adult lover that spills over to her students, for instance, isn't quite the same, in terms of judging the nurturing qualities of a society.

    13. Re:unwholesome behavior by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What it all boils down to is that government is an extension of family values; that government is essentially expected to create the kind of society that families want their kids to grow up in.

      There is far too much diversity families' opinions for any government to ever be able to set policies that reflect those opinions. Or at least that's how it is in 100% of Western cultures. If Easterners are really all so monolithic such that it is even remotely possible that a government could function as an extension of all -- or even a 51% majority -- of their values, then Fuck Those Guys and I'm glad the government is suppressing them, since they're only robots rather than real people anyway.

      Over here, government can't create the society you want (that would be unfair to everyone else) but what it does do, is allow you to build that society.

    14. Re:unwholesome behavior by khallow · · Score: 1

      No, you just like to imagine there's a stark difference.

      Time out. Let's use our brains for half a minute here. Here's the key difference. If I raise my kids in a way you don't like, then nothing happens. If I raise my kids in a way that is made illegal and I get caught, then I go to jail. That works for something things like murder. Killing my kids should be punished by the state. But using the force of the state to enforce a perceived standard of good parenting? That's a gross abuse of a great power.

    15. Re:unwholesome behavior by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      Untrue. The community, or even entire State is an extension of the family in many cultures. Just because it isn't in yours doesn't mean that's true everywhere.

    16. Re:unwholesome behavior by kramerd · · Score: 1

      And yet this state action simply requires parents to make decisions regarding their child's internet usage (it's China, there is only one kid :)) by holding the parents responsible for inappropriate use. Its not like a parent can't set up an account, link a credit card, and let their kids play on it.

      The legislation prohibiting content advocating superstition is a bit absurd considering that China is full of superstition. New Year is entirely based on superstition (firecrackers are set off to scare off the old year and welcome the new one), where all doors and windows must be open at midnight to allow the old year to escape. The number 4 is considered to be the unluckiest number because it is similiar to the chines word for death, whereas the number 8 is lucky because it sounds like prosper. The number of steps in a staircase is supposed to be even-numbered. It is bad luck for a door to directly face a road. The deceased's children and grandchildren should not cut their hair for 49 days. Owning a pet turtle is thought to slow your business. Over 85% of Chinese middle school students have their fortune read.

    17. Re:unwholesome behavior by jandersen · · Score: 1

      There is a stark difference between a parent setting such rules for their children and a state doing it on their behalf

      There is a difference, but I can't see that it is "stark"; I take it you are American, right? Americans tend to see government, and especially American government, as The Enemy - in many, if not most other countries, we don't. Chinese culture has always regarded the ruler (and by extension his government) as the father of the whole people - the son of Heaven and all that - and it not alien to the Chinese to expect the government to take parental responsibility. You may not feel comfortable with it, but then of course, you don't live there anyway. My guess is that Chinese themselves want it that way.

      On that same note, I think a lot of Americans would like to see their ruling classes take much more responsibility and be much more caring; there is of course a certain degree of mutuality here - if you expect somebody to be selfish, useless parasites, chances are that they will turn out to be exactly that.

    18. Re:unwholesome behavior by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They shot Kenny..?

  2. What is this 'unwholesome' behaviour . . . by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    . . . where can I get some, and can I pay for it with virtual currency . . . ?

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  3. communists don't support capitalism... by Michael+Kristopeit · · Score: 0

    from the international economic journal, "DUH."

  4. Predicted outcome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    So the underage will go work in factory sweatshops and the adults will become gold farmers. I'm sure that's the social outcome they were going for ... another success story of the Chinese gov't.

  5. cults? by gandhi_2 · · Score: 1

    you mean like the communist party?

    1. Re:cults? by mea37 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hmm... I can't find a single definition of "cult" that's more applicable to communism than to capitalism, but I suppose if you want to apply any and every label you perceive as negative to any and every belief you perceive as negative that's your prerogative.

    2. Re:cults? by negRo_slim · · Score: 1

      haaaaaaaaa

      --
      On the Oregon Cost born and raised, On the beach is where I spent most of my days
    3. Re:cults? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm... I can't find a single definition of "cult" that's more applicable to communism than to capitalism, but I suppose if you want to apply any and every label you perceive as negative to any and every belief you perceive as negative that's your prerogative.

      Lay off gandhi 2... No wonder he's cranky... His blood sugar is probably low from all the fasting he's doing.

    4. Re:cults? by mog007 · · Score: 1

      Doesn't chairman Mao have a huge cult of personality? It seems that in most "Communist" countries, the leader seems to generate a cult of personality: North Korea under both Kims, the USSR under Stalin, Cuba under Castro.

      Granted, you're exactly right that Communism itself is no more a cult than Capitalism.

    5. Re:cults? by Shakrai · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Except that capitalism allows for self-determination.....

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    6. Re:cults? by mea37 · · Score: 1

      I'm not going to get into a debate about whether self-determination is possible under communism.

      Instead, I'm going to reiterate my original point: Where in the definition of cult do you see anything about self-determination?

    7. Re:cults? by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      There is a difference between the theoretical economic system and the cabal of sycophants demanding absolute authority and unquestioning belief, reinforced by indoctrination from birth and violence in the face of confrontation. I'm not saying that capitalism doesn't itself have such a cabal (it does, but it doesn't wield quite the same degree of absolute power and authority as the CCCP), just that you are not really discussing the same thing as the grandparent.

    8. Re:cults? by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 1

      Hmm... I can't find a single definition of "cult" that's more applicable to communism than to capitalism

      Hint: which -ism requires you to shoot your own people to keep them from practicing it?

    9. Re:cults? by Shakrai · · Score: 2, Informative

      From Wikipedia: The word cult pejoratively refers to a group whose beliefs or practices are reasonably considered strange. The word originally denoted a system of ritual practices. The narrower, derogatory sense of the word is a product of the 20th century, especially since the 1980s, and is considered subjective, and is a result of the anti-cult movement, which uses the word in reference to groups seen as authoritarian, exploitative and possibly dangerous.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    10. Re:cults? by icebraining · · Score: 1

      Neither have a very good track record on that.

    11. Re:cults? by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Yup.

      If you have a health problem, you are free to work or die.

      If you don't come from a wealthy family who can support you in hard times, you are free to work or starve on the streets.

      "Choice. The problem is choice." Neo

      When the program later known as the Oracle aided the Matrix by adding to its programming the power of choice, human minds connected to the Matrix were not only able to accept the artificial reality as their only reality, but feel enabled to make decisions that affected palpable changes in their existence, even if the minds were only vaguely aware of their options. (Matrix Wiki)

      Every system collapses on its own waste. Capitalism is a system that contains the seeds of Oligarchy and Facism. It's impossible to keep them from growing over time and eventually, as with the matrix, there must be a revolution to reboot the system. To remove the 99.999% of wealth from the .1% of the population who are letting everyone else starve. Because anyone who gains an edge, can build on that edge until they have a complete lock on their position, including passing it to their children, eventually a tiny group of society comes to have most of the wealth and power.

      Communism starts out as a nice dream of fairness and eventually turns into a dictatorship. Because no one in the center is smart enough to determine the needs of the many, it is increasingly inefficient.

      There is a LOT of propoganda around capitalism in america. the basic idea of capitalism is sound (if hot dogs are $3.25 here and $6.25 two blocks away- somehow those prices are going to arbitrage. Either people will start going to the $3.25 hot dog place or people will start carrying the $3.25 hot dogs to the $6.25 place).

      But then, in our system, the $6.25 hot dog place has laws passed which prevent the $3.25 hot dogs from being sold or carried to the $6.25 place. Then that extra money is used to further prevent the $3.25 hot dogs from being sold within 20 blocks of the $6.25 hot dog's "exclusive" territory. And so on.

      And for the same reason, no other Matrix movies will be made. Only the creators could make other Matrix movies, and fortunately they realized they couldn't do a decent job and just stopped at #1.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    12. Re:cults? by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      Communism starts out as a nice dream of fairness and eventually turns into a dictatorship.

      Nope. Read anything on, or by, Lenin or Mao (just pulling two examples out of thin air), and you'll quickly discover that the countries they conquered started off as dictatorships under a veneer of communism.

      Not saying communism can't eventually become a dictatorship, but seeing as we don't have any actual examples of such, claiming that as fact is dead wrong.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    13. Re:cults? by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Real world capitalism isn't very cult-like but the Libertarian extreme of "the free market will fix everything" probably qualifies. Real world communism on the other hand is fairly cult-like.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    14. Re:cults? by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 1

      Really? Thirty million killed by Stalin alone is matched by Western capitalist democracies, how?

    15. Re:cults? by icebraining · · Score: 1

      So anything less than 30M is a good track record? Capitalism has spun off plenty of wars, killing at least thousands. That's pretty bad in my POV.

    16. Re:cults? by Shakrai · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If you have a health problem, you are free to work or die.

      Liberty isn't freedom from want, it's the freedom to make your own choices in life. I would rather live in a system where I can go broke paying my medical bills than one that compels me to purchase insurance from for-profit enterprises or to receive all of my care from Doctors working under contract with the Government. Collectivism can't exist without trampling on individual liberty and I do not regard that as a fair trade.

      But then, in our system, the $6.25 hot dog place has laws passed which prevent the $3.25 hot dogs from being sold or carried to the $6.25 place. Then that extra money is used to further prevent the $3.25 hot dogs from being sold within 20 blocks of the $6.25 hot dog's "exclusive" territory. And so on.

      What you've described is not capitalism, it's corporatism. It's responsible for a large number of broken markets in our country, including the market for internet access. The mono/duopoly situation that exists there is written into law in the form of "franchise" agreements that grant one or two companies the exclusive right to use something (the utility easement) that's theoretically owned by the entire community.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    17. Re:cults? by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Capitalism has spun off plenty of wars, killing at least thousands.

      Sure, certain capitalist-leaning countries have committed international atrocities, and no one is trying to justify those actions.

      The point is, the capitalist countries are the ones that don't shoot their own citizens for trying to leave.

    18. Re:cults? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since you can't tell the difference, you are a muddleheaded nincompoop.

    19. Re:cults? by icebraining · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You do know that China is now extremely capitalist, right? Since Mao's demise and Xiaoping's rise to power, the shift towards capitalist economic tendencies was abrupt. This is the guy who said "We mustn't fear to adopt the advanced management methods applied in capitalist countries". China is the country that is planning on reforming the VAT and cutting billions from (privately owned) corporate taxes.

      Capitalism != democracy.

    20. Re:cults? by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Capitalism- like libertarianism- never exists for long in it's true form.
      Capitalism always corrupts to oligarchy, corporatism, and fascism.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    21. Re:cults? by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I agree with you there, China is something else entirely. They may yet sell us the rope we'll hang ourselves with.

    22. Re:cults? by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      An interesting if completely wrong opinion....

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    23. Re:cults? by rmushkatblat · · Score: 1

      This is only true in the presence of a large, corrupt government, which is what we are trying to avoid with capitalism.

    24. Re:cults? by khallow · · Score: 1

      What an idiot. You're arguing that quantity doesn't matter, even though "at least thousands" is a hell of a lot less than 30 million. Put up a fight and pull out the Congo Free State example.

    25. Re:cults? by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      No, without the presence of a large government, the businesses run hog-wild over labor and reduce them to a status just above slavery.

      I'm a former libertarian. I read and was propagandized by the hienlien's magical sf libertarian worlds and it took me years to realize reality doesn't work the way he asserted it does.
      As soon as people get power, most abuse it, they abuse as often as they can and as much as they can.

      The only thing that keeps them in check is a government strong enough and willing enough to punish them.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    26. Re:cults? by rmushkatblat · · Score: 1
      Uh, no. You don't need a large government to do the following:

      Enforce contracts

      Punish fraud

      That's it. That's all you need the government to do relating to work. Why else you would need to do anything? If you aren't earning enough, you go on strike or you quit. A business can't run with no employees, so eventually an equilibrium price for your labor is found.

    27. Re:cults? by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      So basically it's "whatever we don't like".

      Recently some supposedly officially recognized US group listed China as a "failed state" -- with pretty much the same explanation.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    28. Re:cults? by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      You can't realistically go on strike any more.

      Businesses coordinate too well and in many cases it's illegal (both at the "small" and "large" government levels).

      Labor has lost tons of power.

      Don't get me wrong- I don't want to live in france (and I think the french are getting a bit tired of the strikes over the last few years).

      There is a glut of labor. You quit, you may not work again. Without a social net that means eventually you are that married couple robbing people at walmart last week. Then we all get to spend $30,000 a year supporting you. That's clearly not going to fly either so I think prison is going to get pretty miserable as funding dries up.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    29. Re:cults? by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      No Capitalism=Gambling

  6. It's for your own good. by Dutchmaan · · Score: 1

    Yeah... you go ahead and do that China. Tighten those screws, add another barrier to people enjoying themselves. Mark my words, you're only sowing the seeds of a revolution your trying to avoid.

    1. Re:It's for your own good. by decipher_saint · · Score: 1

      No kidding, talk about turning up the heat on the pressure cooker.

      Is this what thousands of Chinese died for?

      --
      crazy dynamite monkey
    2. Re:It's for your own good. by angelwolf71885 · · Score: 0

      well with Chinese MMO company's like TQ Digital and Net Dragon Web Soft; screwing its customers it free to play pay to win i say its about damn time China stopped these company's!

    3. Re:It's for your own good. by roguetrick · · Score: 1

      Yeah this really heralds the great uprising of WoW nerds.

      --
      -The world would be a better place if everyone had a hoverboard
    4. Re:It's for your own good. by VendettaMF · · Score: 1

      That's just how things work here.

      Most players here are perfectly happy to defeat their opponent by handing over credit card details instead of grinding/learning to play. So why shouldn't the companies make a profit from it?

      --
      kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
    5. Re:It's for your own good. by angelwolf71885 · · Score: 0

      if it was worthless things that didn't affect the players but looked cool i wouldn't care; but when you can buy power and wipe out the hard working players that just not right! as well as company's like that attack free servers because it takes away there profits! screwing the customer ISN'T capitalism repeat business and referral IS capitalism!

    6. Re:It's for your own good. by VendettaMF · · Score: 1

      All companies that want to stay in business tend to work hard to remove illegal copies of their servers. That's basic business. I know here (China, not \.) folks try to get away with euphemisms like "open server" and "server emulator", but when you duplicate the functionality of the IP of a company by copying their source code (generally leaked by employees) and try to make out that "writing your own server" function by function with their code in the next window over, well, that doesn't really add up.

      If they have created or legally licensed the game then how they charge for it is up to them, and more power to them in shutting down and pursuing legal action against the assholes who copy their stuff illegally.

      --
      kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
    7. Re:It's for your own good. by angelwolf71885 · · Score: 0

      breaking encryption to ADD functionality or improvements IS exempt from the DMCA making the server free IS adding functionality as well as increasing drops and evening out the classes ( piss poor TQ Digital encryption at that ) there were servers before the binary leaks it was written in C+ and started with an L ive forgotten its name i support anything that screws of TQ and all other china games

    8. Re:It's for your own good. by ljgshkg · · Score: 1

      I guess it's because for most families, money is really not so easy to earn. And prices of everything is rising in cities. And job market is not very good also. Most of these parents save up every bit of their money trying to support their child's education in the future.

        Now, most of these kids who pay for these games probably get their money from parents, and the problem of "addition" to internet and internet games games are pretty serious. This can potentially harm their family's financial and their future education situation.

      So personally, I think they do have enough reason behind that.

      You got to know, finance situation of most companies in mainland China are much worse than in western countries. It's "just enough" for living and is very hard to support higher education already. It's sometimes hard to control the kids on parent's side. Then law like that can just stop a lot of problems caused by this.

    9. Re:It's for your own good. by Thinboy00 · · Score: 1

      This is in China. The DMCA is irrelevant. Parent is talking about morals, not laws. And ACTA hasn't passed yet so it doesn't apply.

      --
      $ make available
    10. Re:It's for your own good. by angelwolf71885 · · Score: 0

      TQ operates here in America and has an English version too so yah DMCA counts

    11. Re:It's for your own good. by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

      Mark my words, you're only sowing the seeds of a revolution your trying to avoid.

      Umm.. the "seed" here is the Internet. China didn't "sow" that; the DARPA did. More astute observers familiar with concepts such as cultural export as a propaganda tool might find that interesting.

    12. Re:It's for your own good. by VendettaMF · · Score: 1

      Even if the DMCA doesn't count (and your arguments for that are childish, bordering on nonsensical) basic international copyright law still applies in full and says that you're full of shit.

      Copying a server to make it free (as in beer of course) is not actually adding any functionality. And even if it were, who cares? It's still copyright and patent infringement.

      As a side note, I recently fired a junior coder with a similar attitude to yours. On top of his other attitude problems there was the constant insistence on lifting chunks of code from other "projects" (by which he meant codebases stolen from various games companies) and pasting it more or less verbatim into his work. In order to get the firing signed off on I had to point out to the boss that "If he is sol cavalier with other peoples code, why should we believe he isn't already releasing ours to all his thieving friends as well?"

      --
      kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
    13. Re:It's for your own good. by Dutchmaan · · Score: 1

      If the Chinese are as "astute" as yourself, then perhaps I was mistaken to raise any sort of alarming rhetoric.

  7. If they can't tax it then ban it! by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    If they can't tax it then ban it!

  8. Kenfukky Tied Chicken! by NyteGeek · · Score: 0

    Help! I'm being chased by a virtual Kenfukky Tied Chicken! I need gold to buy uber armor!

  9. But They DO Tax It, Or At Least Try To ... by eldavojohn · · Score: 2, Informative

    If they can't tax it then ban it!

    After it challenged the Yuan, they did implement a tax. Although, who knows, if the tax collector comes knocking maybe he won't find anything wrong if the right amount of paper is left in his hand after you shake it?

    --
    My work here is dung.
  10. Unwholesome behavoir? by TrebleJunkie · · Score: 1

    You mean, like, Virtual Capitalism?

    --

    Ed R.Zahurak

    You know, oblivion keeps looking better every day.

  11. Wha? by jav1231 · · Score: 1

    "Communist nation restricts freedom!" And that's news?

  12. Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Way to go china!

    I always expected the games to finally do something about the damm gold farmers. But no... they won't dare do anything that might annoy paying customers.

    Now to just get rid of the korean farmers and mmo games will get even better!

  13. There goes WoW by butterflysrage · · Score: 1

    Twilight's Hammer is a cult (and a major player in the next expantion)

    --
    the preceding post was not spell checked... suck it.
    1. Re:There goes WoW by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      Right, because it didn't have any violence at all.

      Anyhow, the restrictions only apply to minors. Adults can still get all the violence and cults they crave.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    2. Re:There goes WoW by rainmouse · · Score: 1

      I don't think killing cultists counts as advocating cults.

      Gold selling is actually illegal in most countries including the UK (not sure about the USA) but is largely unenforced.

      I'm not sure what all the fuss is about. Why all the nerdrage about China wanting to restrict childrens access to material that promotes pornography, cults or gambling etc? As for the online currency regulations, I also don't see a problem in games that use target kids and then use addiction in order to lure them into using their parents credit cards to buy in game money. Perhaps if a lot of Chinese were voicing their concerns I might think otherwise, but I'm assuming its mostly westerners getting riled up on other peoples behalf with limited information.

    3. Re:There goes WoW by rmushkatblat · · Score: 1

      Why would you make something illegal that is already illegal?

  14. What minors? by iPhr0stByt3 · · Score: 1

    There is a foolproof method that video games use to prove that the end-user is at least 18 and according to this infallible system's statistics it seems there are VERY little minors. But I will say it's odd that there are so many players whose birthday is 1992-01-01 0.o

    1. Re:What minors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course they're little - they're minors. Unless you were talking about dwarf kids.

  15. Virtual Currency vs 'play money'? by HockeyPuck · · Score: 1

    What's the difference between virtual currency in the WoW sense and the pieces of paper you get with the game monopoly?

    1. Re:Virtual Currency vs 'play money'? by cf18 · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can trade WoW golds to real $.

    2. Re:Virtual Currency vs 'play money'? by nephilimsd · · Score: 1

      Play with a competitive enough group, and you can charge real money for monopoly money, too.

    3. Re:Virtual Currency vs 'play money'? by vux984 · · Score: 1

      At which point I assume using it in that game of monopoly will be illegal.
      When playing WoW you are already playing with that group.

    4. Re:Virtual Currency vs 'play money'? by Pingmaster · · Score: 1
    5. Re:Virtual Currency vs 'play money'? by shentino · · Score: 1

      With monopoly money, you just need colored paper and you can actually print it.

      In a virtual world, you at least have to have someone grind it out for you.

      Paper and ink versus internet service, subscription, and electricity.

    6. Re:Virtual Currency vs 'play money'? by vux984 · · Score: 1

      In a virtual world, you at least have to have someone grind it out for you.

      Not at all. Any single player role playing game in existance has 'virtual currency' and its trivial to generate as much of it as you'd like. Whether its bottlecaps in fallout or wheatever. That is more like 'monopoly money'.

      Virtual currency in persistant oline rpgs is more like casino chips.

  16. Maybe this is a bit selfish but... by Rinnon · · Score: 1

    I wonder how this is going to affect Gold Farming in WoW. It's a relatively known fact that the majority of Gold Farmers are in China. While this can't be proven, it's the theory I subscribe too. I also subscribe to the theory that the majority of that majority are minors, who are being paid, probably very little, to farm gold. I wonder if this ban is going to have a positive affect on the problem of gold farming? It's probably too hopeful to think so, I'm sure they'd just find ways around this law. But it's worth thinking about.

    1. Re:Maybe this is a bit selfish but... by VendettaMF · · Score: 1

      Given that gold farming and child labor are already illegal here, it probably won't affect much at all. This is just another "company shakedown law", implemented because simple tax increases are too inflexible and put too many paper trails on the money.

      --
      kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
  17. As always when any topic of China is raised on /. by VendettaMF · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The point is completely missed.

    This law is not being created to control "the people". It is not being made to be enforced.

    This law, as with well over half of Chinese law, has only one purpose. To ensure that no one may exist in a fully legal state within the borders of China. Seriously. You can't. It is not actually possible to complete all the legal requirements to exist as a citizen, a foreigner or a company in China without committing crimes in other areas of the countries laws. The classic example being that if you try to migrate legally from rural to urban China as a Chinese citizen it will be noted that you either illegally entered a city to visit the offices of the PSB (police dept responsible for all "person location" aspects of control) to fill in the necessary forms, or that you obtained forms illegally removed from PSB offices.

    (The equivalent for foreigners is the medical exam. You may not enter China without a full medical exam. Only medical exams performed in Chinese hospitals are legally accepted.
    (Entry with medical reports from foreign (or S.A.R.) hospitals are routinely accepted, but right there they have all the grounds they need to deport you should you ever try to (for example) take someone rich enough to own a car to court for hitting you with said car.)

    But why?
    Well, that's got two parts to it.

    The first is the same as many western states with laws prohibiting things such as "wasting police time", "loitering" and "resisting arrest". Purely so they have something to charge you with if they decide they don't like the look of your face.

    The second, closely related, is so that those in power have something to hold over people who they feel are being less than sufficiently forthcoming with the bribes.

    --
    kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
  18. Thankfully by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

    Capitalism wants the opposite of communism.

    oh, wait...

    --
    The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    1. Re:Thankfully by Locke2005 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Communism is a system of man's exploitation by man, whereas in Capitalism, it is the other way around!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    2. Re:Thankfully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So then capitalism is a system of women's exploitation by women?

    3. Re:Thankfully by SnEptUne · · Score: 1

      Don't be silly, the opposite of man is not woman. What gp means is that capitalism is a man of system's exploitation by system.

  19. So what? by cf18 · · Score: 1

    It's not really different from banning minors from gambling in casinos.

  20. Re:As always when any topic of China is raised on by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    In California, you cannot be arrested for resisting arrest -- there has to be some other crime for which you are being arrested before they can charge you with resisting. However, if you object to anything the police do, you are generally charged with "disturbing the peace" or "obstructing a police officer".

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  21. Re:As always when any topic of China is raised on by Hatta · · Score: 1

    This law, as with well over half of Chinese law, has only one purpose. To ensure that no one may exist in a fully legal state within the borders of China.

    How is that any different from any other country?

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  22. Holy hell video games banned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The new regulations explicitly 'forbid content advocating violence in all online games.'

    So any game where you have to kill mobs is banned, wow!

  23. New restrictions by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 1

    The new regulations explicitly 'forbid content advocating pornography, cults, superstitions, gambling, and violence in all online games.'

    So what's left to play with?

  24. Minors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't some online games already try to restrict gold mining?

    Or are we talking about people who work in real world mines. I don't know if china has a lot of gold mines, but they sure have a lot of coal mines.

  25. Re:As always when any topic of China is raised on by VendettaMF · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And I'm going to take a wild guess that when an officer says "He disturbed the peace", and the bloke who happened to laugh too loudly when the police officer got shat on by a pigeon denies it, the "punk with a badge"'s word is held as truth by default?

    --
    kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
  26. Hmm ... by Korbeau · · Score: 1

    I also think that it is a good thing to prevent minors to do online transactions, particularly of "virtual currency" stuff, without some kind of monitoring or parental consent etc. This sounds perfectly reasonable.

    And to put the "unwholesome" comment into context which seems to annoy everyone, imagine a US politician saying vague words like "it is morally irresponsible to do X" or "it is to protect the rights our fathers gave us" etc. I mean, it's a speech.

    So China makes what seem a sensible law ... can someone explain to me why it is that bad?

  27. What games are left ? by RichMan · · Score: 1

    "The new regulations explicitly 'forbid content advocating pornography, cults, superstitions, gambling, and violence in all online games.' "

    No guns, swords, knives, portals .....
    No minesweeper.
    No Solitaire (you can gamble on that in some casino's)
    No bubble popping.
    No reversi (Go is basic strategic battle simulation)
    No chess
    No Mahjongg

    1. Re:What games are left ? by izomiac · · Score: 1

      Basically non-contact sports games (assuming they don't reference "Taiwan"). In other words, stuff that you have no reason to do virtually rather than physically. One of the main advantages of games is to the ability do things you can't or shouldn't in real life.

    2. Re:What games are left ? by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      Minesweeper does not advocate violence, quite the opposite in fact. You are attempting mark destructive devices.
      While one can gamble on solitaire, one can not do so in the game, so it does not advocate gambling. The same goes for Mahjongg.
      Bubble popping is not violent.
      Reversi and chess teach strategy, not violence or war.

      One does not have to do something even if one is able to do said thing.
      Slippery slope is a fallacy. Just because one takes one step, it does not follow that one will take any or all of the steps necessary to bring one down the slope. One can say "Here and no farther!"

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    3. Re:What games are left ? by mattholimeau · · Score: 1

      I dunno about your solitaire argument - even though people do gamble on it, the cards aren't saying "bet with me, bet with me" when you look at them. (While they could - and that might be a neat concept for an online casino game or something, this is aside from the point.) Card games don't afford gambling simply because they are gambled on. But as to all your other points, yeah - no minesweeper, no chess, no bubble popping, no reversi... chess and go *do* (intrinsically) say "we're fighting a war" when you look at them. I agree this just won't be enforced, adding to the air of hypocrisy that is commonly held as the image of the chinese government.

    4. Re:What games are left ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reversi and chess teach strategy, not violence or war.

      Obviously, you have never played Tic-Tac-Toe with a WOPR.

  28. Re:As always when any topic of China is raised on by VendettaMF · · Score: 1

    There are a few countries out there (small ones with governments designed to be ineffective) where it is possible to exist (for brief periods of time) in a legally guilt-free state.
    Not many, and not often, true.

    As opposed to here where a single glance at a persons face tells those in the know which set of pre-stamped arrest forms to use to tie you legally in knots while they decide whether to extract cash from you or disappear you.

    --
    kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
  29. I'm going to register as a minor... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If this happens, I will register as a minor that way I won't have to put up with all of that gold mining crap. Maybe virtual currency should be banned all together.

  30. More info needed by BenEnglishAtHome · · Score: 1

    There are a few countries out there (small ones with governments designed to be ineffective) where it is possible to exist (for brief periods of time) in a legally guilt-free state.

    Cite, please.

    I'm serious; I'm retiring soon and I'd put such countries on my list of residence options.

    1. Re:More info needed by VendettaMF · · Score: 1

      Try Ireland. It's neither easy nor automatic, but it is possible both to live in a legally innocent state, and/or through careful restitution restore yourself to such a state if you screw up.

      --
      kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
    2. Re:More info needed by BenEnglishAtHome · · Score: 1

      Thank you. I'll (seriously) look into it.

  31. China has moved past farming by quarmar · · Score: 1

    I liked the part of Tencent saying that this won't affect their business. The Chinese gold sellers don't farm for gold anymore, they are simply hacking into accounts, selling off the characters' possessions and taking the gold.

  32. Superstition? by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

    This from a country that forbids the depiction of skeletons?

    --
    There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    1. Re:Superstition? by rhenley · · Score: 1

      One man's superstition is another man's religion.

    2. Re:Superstition? by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      Ah, and here I was thinking religion == superstition.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    3. Re:Superstition? by slick7 · · Score: 1

      One man's superstition is another man's religion.

      One man's theology is another man's belly laugh. - The Notebooks of Lazarus Long

      --
      The mind conceives, the body achieves, the spirit manifests.
  33. don't gold farmers use bots with like 1 guy 5 syst by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    don't gold farmers use bots with like 1 guy looking over 5 systems at a time?

  34. F4988 by digitalmonkey2k1 · · Score: 1

    unexpected end of format

    --
    My sausage tree didn't grow, does that make me a bad mommy?
  35. Re:As always when any topic of China is raised on by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure about the medical, but when you visit China (Shanghai at least), you must register with the police or a hotel within 24 hours. Every hotel I've been to so far has scanned my passport into their system.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  36. Re:As always when any topic of China is raised on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Must be a Shanghai only thing. I have been to a handful of cities in China. I never had to show a passport anywhere.

  37. Re:As always when any topic of China is raised on by hackingbear · · Score: 1

    (The equivalent for foreigners is the medical exam. You may not enter China without a full medical exam. Only medical exams performed in Chinese hospitals are legally accepted. (Entry with medical reports from foreign (or S.A.R.) hospitals are routinely accepted, but right there they have all the grounds they need to deport you should you ever try to (for example) take someone rich enough to own a car to court for hitting you with said car.)

    What are you talking about? In the rather distance past, outside people should get the city permit in their local police office for visit; that rule was scrapped quite long ago as I remember. Outside people still need to get resident permit, but there is no restriction in entering the cities. (For the 'special economic zones," one can apply for the entry permit at the checkpoint.)

    Foreigners need medical exam only if they stay in China for employment. Therefore you can enter China with medical exams, like thousands of tourists every day do, and only do the medical within China when you apply for the working permit. I got one before.

    So there are not many intrinsic contradictions in the rules. However, partially because of there are many inconvenient rules and partially because the governments are not creditworthy and having little actual controls, people tend to ignore rules whenever they find any need to. That's why in China one doesn't have a lot of freedom legally speaking but not many seem to be bothered because they don't care about everyday laws since the 1980s.

  38. Re:As always when any topic of China is raised on by hackingbear · · Score: 1

    Therefore you can enter China with medical exams, like ...

    Oh... typo. I meant "Therefore you can enter China without medical exams, like ...".

  39. just like porn by icegreentea · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not like no country is the free world is evil enough to ban porn for children right? Right?

    Get a grip guys. China may do some horrible/stupid things. But this is overblowing things. We have laws preventing commercial entities from selling certain products/services to people underage in north america (and most of the industrial world). We have laws making underage possession of said entities illegal for fuck's sake, and we've all gone out and made arguments based on children's lack of education/inability to take responsibility of themselves, and then went and ahead and accepted the unfortunate coarseness of age based laws.

    So don't go out and bash the fuck out of China for this. Yes, they are controlling the Chinese children's freedom. Just like how I wasn't able to buy my own booze when I was 16. There are better things to criticize China for.

    1. Re:just like porn by selven · · Score: 1, Interesting

      So don't go out and bash the fuck out of China for this. Yes, they are controlling the Chinese children's freedom. Just like how I wasn't able to buy my own booze when I was 16. There are better things to criticize China for.

      Being prevalent does not make injustice less unjust. France survives just fine with its lax alcohol policies, so allowing people to buy booze at age 16 is clearly practical. We've decided that we'd rather lose freedom than require parents to actually do their jobs, and so has China, but that doesn't make it right.

  40. virtual currency by slick7 · · Score: 1

    The Chinese should come to America, we've been running on virtual currency since the government went off the gold standard.
    How else could the private corporate banksters bankrupt a nation? Look at the world and prove this wrong.
    Announce NESARA, it's time to put these bastards away.http://www.nesara.us/pages/home.html
    It's time for the government to print the currency, interest free, backed by precious metals. Then and only then will inflation become manageable, if not reversed.
    Here's something worth watching.. http://truinternational2.blogspot.com/2009/06/part-1-part-2-legacy-of-freedom-that.html

    --
    The mind conceives, the body achieves, the spirit manifests.
  41. Re:As always when any topic of China is raised on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll admit that conceptually you might be right. But I don't think you're correct about PSB registration or the medical exam.

    Firstly, foreigners need to register with the local PSB when they change where they live. You get grace period of something like 24-48 hours. Hard to believe the locals are not afforded the same 'luxury'. Actually none of my friends who migrated from another city have mentioned the need for them to register with PSB and usually ask me a lot of questions about it whenever I tell them I need to do it.
    That said, I know they have to register their employment details with someone *eventually* and you do realize that when you fly domestically in China you need to submit your ID card at the airport for some kind of 'police registration'.

    The medical exam depends on which visa you are travelling on. A tourist need not submit for a medical exam unless they show flu symptoms at the airport. In my experience this is pretty standard in most Asian countries.

    If you are applying for a residency permit, your Z visa should grant you 30 days grace to get all the paperwork finalized and attend the medical exam. Again, this isn't too far from normal practice for most other Asian countries in my experience (I've been working / living in Asia for about 6 years).

    Better examples:

    - the authority seemingly granted to street cops in most chinese cities to 'resolve' small / minor crimes on the spot. This is no doubt abused quite a lot, however, I have seen it work well personally a few times in my tenure here (fender benders and drunken foreigners breaking things). Situations that would normally, in western countries, end up in court costing everybody a lot of time and money for the sake of 'due process'. Still if I had the choice, I'd choose 'due process' over 'let the guy on the ground save us some paperwork'.

    - the police can hold you without arrest in many situations for at least 14 days.

    - so many laws we'd take seriously in a western country and abide by, are broken daily in plain sight in any street in China but simply not enforced by the police unless there is some kind of 'crack down'.

    personally, I can see the pitfalls of the system, but I have to admit it works well considering the population and culture of China.

  42. logic fail... by allcaps · · Score: 1

    Isn't currency virtual in and of itself? I don't trade goats for eggs for a reason...

  43. Re:As always when any topic of China is raised on by VendettaMF · · Score: 1

    >>In the rather distance past, outside people should get the city permit in their local police office for visit; that rule was scrapped quite long ago as I remember.

    I believe you'll find on closer inspection that "enforcement" of that rule has been scrapped for quite some time. Certainly just pre-Olympics that rule was enforced with a vengeance, emptying the hosting cities of every homeless person and "non-desirable" by means of loading them into trucks and dumping them a long way out into the countryside under that law.

    >> Foreigners need medical exam only if they stay in China for employment. Therefore you can enter China with medical exams, like thousands of tourists every day do, and only do the medical within China when you apply for the working permit. I got one before.

    The problem there is that entering China on a non-working visa, and then obtaining the working visa within the country (while extremely common) is also very specifically laid down as being illegal.
    As are the "HK Runs" so commonly used by English teachers whose employing schools lack the face to get the illegal processing done on the mainland.

    --
    kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
  44. Re:As always when any topic of China is raised on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thats not strictly true. As a foreigner you are allowed to visit as a tourist without any medical examination whatsoever, only a declaration (which is the same as pretty mcuh every country I have ever been to, ever.). It was in the news recently as well that the declaration requirements have been lowered to allow people with HIV in as tourists now.

    You only need the exam if you want to work or take up permanent residence or some kind.

    So, you can do what I did, and what is suggested by the immigration board, and enter as a tourist visa, undergo the examination, and then leave the country, appy for residence, and re-enter. It was a major pain in the lower back but all perfectly what they ask for.

  45. So how does the state define and enforce the rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure, I guess a virtual currency could be defined as game credit that is available for purchase, but exactly is promoting "superstition, gambling, pornography" anyways? Anything they want I guess.

    This is my refute to anyone in favor of such a measure as protecting "children", because a closer examination shows that it has not clearly what these "dangers" really are, how they will be identified, and a lack empirical evidence that there a net benefit to the rule; all factors adjusted to various contingencies and the way technology changes over time. But hey, in China do they have social science outfits and studies of public policies and a legal framework that makes sense, at least to do anything beyond defend the state elite from the people. Its like the mob indeed.

  46. Re:As always when any topic of China is raised on by Monchanger · · Score: 1

    ...when an officer says "He disturbed the peace" ... the "punk with a badge"'s word is held as truth ...

    No. This kind of glib attitude is exactly why there is a need to provide officers with such authority. If everyone respected a police officer's authority to uphold the law, there would be no point in providing an officer the ability to charge you with ignoring or assaulting them.

    "when an officer says..." is not something you should just throw around so casually. Police officers are expected to be truthful, unlike little children and childish adults. The law dictates that their jobs depend on being honest and accurate as everything they "say" is official state business.

    The existence of a minority of corrupt officers is never an excuse to paint them all with the same brush and treat them poorly when they do follow the law. Obstinate punks like you contribute to the reason that the word of officers in good standing is worth more than mine, so quit being a jackass just because it makes you popular in high school.

  47. Re:As always when any topic of China is raised on by VendettaMF · · Score: 1

    Your English is pretty good, but clearly not your first language, so I'll cut you some slack on your mis-used vocabulary and bizarre colloquialism choices.

    Your attitude however, is sickening.

    In court the only correct response to "the police officer says" is "What evidence does the police officer offer to corroborate their claims?".

    Police officers lie, misrepresent the truth and recollect only what they think they saw (which is usually what they wanted to see) just like every other human being on the planet.

    There are good reasons why "police state" is a bad thing. Taking the line that police officers must be believed and/or obeyed without question is supporting a position very far down the way to full police state thinking.

    >> "Police officers are expected to be truthful"
    No, actually they're not. No more so (and commonly a lot less so) than the average human being.

    --
    kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
  48. No, the cat does not, in fact, "got my tongue." by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    because doing such a thing might promote 'unwholesome' behavior.

    Like, oh, I don't know. Becoming greedy and rising in the communist hierarchy?

    Or, worse, learn capitalist values hard work, and the belief that giving kickbacks to local officials is not "part of the legitimate business world", to pull a phrase from Back to School?

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  49. Re:As always when any topic of China is raised on by Monchanger · · Score: 1

    I'd love to watch a video of you in a random police department in the USA, honestly discussing this attitude you have with the folks who work there and see if it changes your mind. I have no idea where you get the extremist notion that the average officer has something against you. Enlighten us with something other than unjustified accusations- what's caused this mistrust?

    Yeah, English isn't my primary language. I've been to places where police are actually corrupt and abusive and 'baksheesh' is the norm. The modern United States is not such a place, and Americans who complain about their police, exaggerating as if they live in "police state" are, frankly, idiots who need to grow up. America has plenty of problems, this doesn't come anywhere near the top of the list. I'm sure there are a couple small towns where there's only one lawman who's abusive, but an entire large department under supervision of a political body? I don't think so. The simple fact is that in no other place on Earth do those accused of crimes have more protection from abuse than is provided by the US constitution.

    As for commenting on my English, I'd rather you help me learn from my alleged mistakes than just arrogantly infer your superiority in a prelude to- and distraction from your extremist argument. I didn't advocate a police state, nor suggested we should be naive enough to assume officers are never corrupt.

  50. Re:As always when any topic of China is raised on by hackingbear · · Score: 1

    Certainly just pre-Olympics that rule was enforced with a vengeance, emptying the hosting cities of every homeless person and "non-desirable"

    Correct but those people were living in the city and not just visit the city for short business and go home. Of course, strictly speaking it is hard to classify who were there for visit and who for residency. And you don't have to agree with such actions either. But nevertheless it is OK to enter the city for visits and then apply for residence permits (for which you have to find someone to hire you.)

    The problem there is that entering China on a non-working visa, and then obtaining the working visa within the country

    I actually did that too. I was the management of a start-up. I entered the country on tourist visa and later after everything was up and running, I applied for the official employment visa within China. You probably can't even apply for jobs in the US (or HK) on a tourist visa, but there seems no such restriction in China. You can apply for the job on non-employment visa and then convert to employment one as long as you find someone to hire you (and meet the legal wage and pay tax.) Those that run between HK and mainland probably don't know or want to apply for employment visa for whatever reason or convenience they find. That's a different thing. But it was entirely legal for me to convert tourist visa to employment one.

  51. Re:As always when any topic of China is raised on by VendettaMF · · Score: 1

    Ok, first, your assumption that I'm American (or even in America) is incorrect. Fujian province, China.

    Second, I'm not saying all cops are dishonest thugs, though some most certainly are. Rather I'm saying that their word must be assumed to be of no more worth than anyone else's. Where a cops word is taken without other evidence over the word of the person they accuse then you have a corrupted and invalid legal system.

    Thirdly, the claim of US superiority? Having lived long term in China, Oz, England, Ireland, and the US (by long term I mean 5 years or more as an adult in each) I have to tell you the US is strongly threatened for third position when it comes to reasonable police officers and courts that I would consider trustworthy.

    Fourthly, your English is pretty impressive as a second language, particularly if your spoken is on relative equivalence with your written ability. Certainly beats my French and Chinese into the ground.

    Finally, I do not believe, and nothing I've said can be realistically taken to imply, that the police of any nation have anything specific against me. Rather, I am merely reiterating that giving special credence to random authority figures declarations over those of "regular" folks is a severe cultural error. Police are most definitely not better than the average population from which they are drawn. In many cultures and systems they are significantly worse than the people around them in matters of common decency, honesty and justice.

    --
    kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
  52. Re:As always when any topic of China is raised on by VendettaMF · · Score: 1

    >>it is OK to enter the city for visits and then apply for residence permits
    This is factually incorrect (Talking of the rural/urban travel of Chinese citizens)
    That it is not enforced (due to the need for a sub-lower-class workforce to remove garbage and the like in the cities) doesn't change the fact that if you were born in a designated rural area of China you are legally required to obtain a "visa" before entering designated urban areas, said permission being obtainable only by personal visit to PSB offices, which are found only in major cities.

    >> But it was entirely legal for me to convert tourist visa to employment one.

    Again you are factually incorrect.
    It was convenient, but it was most certainly not legal, as you would have learned had anyone with significant face with the PSB stood to profit significantly by your being deported. (It would have had to be rather impressively profitable for them mind you, as it would have cost the official whose stamp was used on your documents and photocopies a lot of face as well).
    The fact that it's easily done and convenient is irrelevant. The law, as written, as currently on the books, is that foreigners may not obtain work visa's while within China unless they already possess a valid FEC, which in turn cannot be obtained unless they already have a valid work visa issued by a Chinese consulate or embassy in their home nation. The FEC's are rarely actually issued at all anymore, having been mostly replaced by the Residence Permit sticker applied alongside the visa in your passport.

    --
    kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
  53. Re:As always when any topic of China is raised on by VendettaMF · · Score: 1

    >> friends who migrated from another city

    Key phrase there : "Another city".

    This particular law is about preventing rural to urban population migration.

    --
    kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
  54. Re:As always when any topic of China is raised on by VendettaMF · · Score: 1

    Not only Shanghai. Any foreigner in China must register their location within 24 hours of arrival. In all decent hotels this is done automatically on check-in (when they scan or photocopy your passport).
    If you are staying in a private residence you get 48 to 72 hours grace to do the registration, and if you stay more than 30 days you have to register residency (a white card with your name, address, and a few other details like the owner of the apartments id number etc).

    Technically when the white card is applied for the police are supposed to inspect the accommodation and make sure it is fit for foreigners, but if they insist on enforcing that rule these days it means you've pissed someone off and should watch your back.

    --
    kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
  55. Re:As always when any topic of China is raised on by Monchanger · · Score: 1

    Apologies for the assumption. The post you replied to by Locke2005 specifically stated California regarding charges of "disturbing the peace" and "obstructing a police officer". So my replies did continue to imply the case of modern USA.

    My problem is with statements such as "random authority figures" and "Police are most definitely not better than the average population", which are terribly insulting and seem to me unjustifiable. This is certainly the case in the US when you consider they not only have far more training than the average pre-college worker. And regardless of training volunteer into a position where they have a significant risk of dying in the line of duty.

    If you want to criticize Chinese authorities, premise your statements to specify what kind of officer you're accusing of being worse than useless.

  56. Re:As always when any topic of China is raised on by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

    --This law, as with well over half of Chinese law, has only one purpose. To ensure that no one may exist in a fully legal state within the borders of China. Seriously. You can't. It is not actually possible to complete all the legal requirements to exist as a citizen, a foreigner or a company in China without committing crimes in other areas of the countries laws.--

    How is this different from the US? In the state of Virginia a worker under 18 can't be allowed to use a box cutter. Did you know that? I didn't either and I bet there is more too.