Slashdot Mirror
IEEE Releases 802.3ba Standard
An anonymous reader writes "EEE announced the ratification of IEEE 802.3ba, a new standard governing 40Gbps and 100Gbps Ethernet operations. An amendment to the IEEE 802.3 Ethernet standard, IEEE 802.3ba, the first standard ever to simultaneously specify two new Ethernet speeds, paves the way for the next generation of high-rate server connectivity and core switching. The new standard will act as the catalyst needed for unlocking innovation across the greater Ethernet ecosystem. IEEE 802.3ba is expected to trigger further expansion of the 40 Gigabit and 100 Gigabit Ethernet family of technologies by driving new development efforts, as well as providing new aggregation speeds that will enable 10Gbps Ethernet network deployments."
It's interesting how this will increase the adoption of iSCSI storage, yet the original reason to go to iSCSI will be lost since fiber cables will have to be laid.
Either way 1Gbit Ethernet is beginning to feel a bit like a bottleneck with storage and other bottlenecks being removed.
It'll take some time between ratification and cheap D-Link switches...
"Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
You know networking exists outside of the internet, right?
I just finally upgraded all of the connections in my house to Gigabit Ethernet, you fucking clod you!
Living With a Nerd
I can't help but wonder what you could actually use 100Gbit/s for, I mean to the best of my knowledge (which is not all that vast I admit) you'd be hard pressed to find a storage unit that can handle these sorts of speeds.
Admit nothing. Deny Everything. Make Counter-accusations.
Yes, but the porn was low-res and slow to download. So it's a double-edged sword.
There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
I would rather have the adds and my 15Mb line, then my old 1200 baud connection to compuserve.
We only use 300 baud for internal stuff.
In 10 minutes I can down load some porn, whack off, and be a sleep in 10 minutes. In those days it was hours just to get a 5 second clip.
what..TMI?
The Kruger Dunning explains most post on
I've been waiting to connect to my 8M Cable modem with 100GE for a while now. Finally, no more bottleneck!
Unfortunately there is no corresponding 100000Base-MrT
The MTU is still 1500 bytes though :(
In 10 minutes I can down load some porn, whack off, and be a sleep in 10 minutes. In those days it was hours just to get a 5 second clip.
Hmm. I could write that the above is an example of how user contributions on a site like Slashdot can offer recommendations to the average reader that are both informative and practical. On the other hand, I could write something to the effect that what you wrote provides more information than most of us asked for, or want.
I suspect both of those are too subtle, so I'll tailor my response to the wider Slashdot demographic:
"Ten minutes!??? You need to find better porn!"
For end users, 100gb/s is almost 'enough'. It's just a hair short (about 2.5x) of the speed needed to stream uncompressed video at the highest resolution anyone is likely to seriously consider, at 240hz. Once you hit that point, you just remote your applications to wherever the data is, and forget about moving data ever again, assuming, of course, that the data is close enough to you to avoid any latency issues for interactivity.
"Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
Tell that to my router... 20Mbps/1.3Mbps
Verizon FIOS here, my basic bundled rate is 25 Mbps/ 25Mbps. I could opt for faster
You are in a maze of twisted little posts, all alike.
But are we talking about 100Gb/s over copper or fiber?
-Rick
Fibre and short-haul (~10m) copper, at least for the current standard. Historically, there's usually a lag of several years between a new Ethernet standard and a 100m copper version.
I'm a bit sceptical about folks who say they'll never be a copper version, because I've heard that tale often enough before. I confidently predict it will be the Year of Linux on the desktop before it's the year of Fibre to the Desktop.
USB3, HDMI, DVI, Ethernet, DisplayPort, FireWire, eSATA, proprietary. There should be one kind cable that can be used for all of these purposes. We have the technology. Consumers will thank you.
The standard includes specifications for copper. 40GBASE-CR4 for 40GB which specifies 4 lanes of twinax cable, and 100GBASE-CR10 for 100GB which specifies 10 lanes of twinax.
Surprise, surprise. Serial too slow? Try parallel!
The road to tyranny has always been paved with claims of necessity.
... and wants its A-Team back. Your meme is violating some copyright somewhere.
Was "I pity the fool" even in The A-Team? I watched like the first two or three seasons of the show and I don't recall Mr. T ever saying it. It was in Rocky III though...
Bow-ties are cool.
Yes, but the porn was low-res and slow to download. So it's a double-edged sword.
Still, I think you're underrating the merits of the slow reveal... I mean, as the image file was loaded byte by byte onto the computer's memory, filling the display with that lustworthy graphical data, gradually revealing more and more, until you had a naked woman on your screen in 320x200 glory, 1bpp plus 4 bit colors, foreground and background, per 8x8 character cell... The five minute wait for the elusive delights to be laid plain was like a striptease...
And when I say 5-minute wait, that's how long it took to load an image from disk. Modem would take longer. :)
Bow-ties are cool.
USB3, HDMI, DVI, Ethernet, DisplayPort, FireWire, eSATA, proprietary. There should be one kind cable that can be used for all of these purposes. We have the technology. Consumers will thank you.
Are you here from Intel marketing?
<wp:Light_Peak>
Oh, heck, that's still not working. fine:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Light_Peak
My God, it's Full of Source!
OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
There isn't a whole lot of difference between the raw speed of the signal in a copper line and fiber line, the electrical signal already travels at effectively the speed of light (or close enough that it doesn't really matter). It's distance that's a problem for copper. An electrical signal through copper has significantly more attenuation than an optical signal through fiber, which means right from the very start the signal is cleaner and more usable. The cleaner the signal, the easier it is to pick up small variations in the signal accurately, and the more data you can pack into the signal. Copper is also vulnerable to noise, which further reduces the signal quality, which means a less complex signal is possible. This is why copper is useful for ultra-high speed IO inside a computer covering inches or less (the IO in a CPU travels only nanometers and is obscenely fast), but once you start stretching it a few feet its effectiveness drops off dramatically. Fiber is capable of handling much longer distances before the same attenuation loss occurs.
Other than that it's just the equipment on the back end that are different, and the concepts behind both fiber and copper are the same. Only the components are different.
In other words, it's trivial to make copper just as fast or faster than fiber. In fact, the fastest copper connections are already faster than the fastest fiber connections. What isn't trivial is making copper as fast as fiber over the same distances. Fiber wins hands down on a run of any distance. Therefor copper only wins on short runs, due to the huge price difference between the two.
Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
Twinax isn't too big, it's the bundle of 10 twinax you need to run 100gbit that are huge.
I'm a little confused, though. Cat6 is capable of 10GbE, so why not bundles of 4 and 10 Cat6 for the standard as well, instead of just twinaxial? I recognize you'd need a special port setup, but that would still be significantly smaller than twinax. They would then be capable of 100m, would they not?
Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller