Slashdot Mirror


Amazon Opposes Plan To End Saturday Mail Delivery

theodp writes "Online retailer giant Amazon.com has come out against a US Postal Service proposal to end Saturday service, part of efforts to address the USPS budget deficit. 'Amazon's customers have come to appreciate and expect Saturday delivery,' explained Amazon VP Paul Misener. 'If the five-day delivery proposal is not withdrawn,' he added, 'we ask that Congress ensure that Saturday delivery be maintained.' In the past, Amazon has argued that it should not have to help support public services in states in which it has no physical presence." The article adds, "Interestingly, online DVD service Netflix is backing the plan to end Saturday mail delivery, arguing that a 'well functioning' Postal Service is more important than 'maintaining current delivery frequency.'"

90 of 504 comments (clear)

  1. The difference between Amazon and Netflix by jmitchel!jmitchel.co · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The difference between Amazon and Netflix is that Netflix product fits comfortably in a mailbox.

    1. Re:The difference between Amazon and Netflix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And, for Netflix, it benefits them by slowing down the rate that they receive videos (though it means Monday's will be heavier than they were before).

      For Amazon, people want Saturday delivery without paying for it. For Netflix, people certainly want it, but if the USPS doesn't do it, then people will understand. So, Netflix can stop staffing the delivery portion of Saturday's if that goes through, while Amazon still has to do everything as normal and they lose the ability to cheaply send packages that can potentially arrive on Saturday.

    2. Re:The difference between Amazon and Netflix by Col.+Klink+(retired) · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Plus, netflix sells you a plan that is limited only by how often you can get mail. If you can't get mail on Saturday, that's one less DVD they have to send you. Amazon, on the other hand, gets paid for every package they send you.

      --

      -- Don't Tase me, bro!

    3. Re:The difference between Amazon and Netflix by jaymz666 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's 17% fewer movies sent and received by Netflix every week. I would expect them to also want more public holidays in a year as well

    4. Re:The difference between Amazon and Netflix by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Most of the products I buy from Amazon COULD fit comfortably in a mailbox, but they come in a box about three times bigger than it needs to be. I ordered a map update for my Magellan GPS, it was on an SD card. It came in a SD card caddy, in an envelope, in a big fucking cardboard box. You know, kind of like getting software licenses from HP. And it's a $50 product, it's not like it deserves a big box based on value.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:The difference between Amazon and Netflix by localman57 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's only 17% for customers who turn their DVDs around ASAP. My wife and I mostly subscribe for the online content, and often have a couple of DVDs sitting around for a few days before we get around to watching them. Obviously, high volume customers will get less value from their subscription. But I think it's a mistake to extrapolate a 17% overall savings from this.

      Also, this will tend to cause more of a surge on Mondays outgoing mail / Tuesday and Wednesday's incoming at Netflix. This will also tend to reduce the positive effect for Netflix. Most companies prefer to have a constant workload across all of their shifts and days, rather than dealing with surges. Like a power company, or a tax consultant, they have to size their capital investment to deal with surges, even though that is not fully utilized most of the time.

    6. Re:The difference between Amazon and Netflix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      We're one of those quick turnaround people. With a 6-day week, we can get a DVD on Wednesday, stick it in the mail Thursday, and get the next on on Saturday. This gives us the weekend to watch that movie and we put it in the mail on Monday, which then gives us another DVD on Wednesday. It's a great routine -- exactly 2 DVD's a week on the same days and one of them to watch every weekend. Taking out Saturday would certainly change things.

    7. Re:The difference between Amazon and Netflix by DriveDog · · Score: 4, Insightful

      True enough. And while Netflix may be looking forward to a mostly-online service, for now their customers (me) will be more likely to keep paying them if we can get DVDs on Saturday. Perhaps they're also being agreeable with the USPS because they've been at odds in the past over envelop jamming and such. I really couldn't care less if I get a package from Amazon on Saturday or wait until Monday. The only case that makes sense to me is when I send a gift and I'm as late ordering it as I usually am. I think skipping another day besides Sunday is OK for the USPS, but I'd vote for Wednesday so as not to have two consecutive days missed.

    8. Re:The difference between Amazon and Netflix by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Our customers are idiots and will never realize they are paying for less, even with the occasional journalist who pushes it in their face.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    9. Re:The difference between Amazon and Netflix by moosesocks · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Go back to your order, and leave packing feedback. Amazon has a nice form letting you vent about ridiculously-sized boxes.

      Ever since they began collecting that data, I've noticed that my Amazon orders do seem to come in more appropriately-sized boxes (although they do still occasionally go ridiculously overboard). Their Frustration Free Packaging initiative is also great for consumers and the environment alike.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    10. Re:The difference between Amazon and Netflix by Golddess · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You mean more mail on Monday?

      With Saturday delivery:
      -On Friday, a particular drop box is emptied.
      -On Saturday, it becomes 50% full by the time the USPS empties it again.
      -On Monday, it has again become 50% full by the time the USPS empties it.

      Without Saturday deliveries, between the Friday and Monday cleanout, the box has become 100% full. So from that particular drop box, there was a 100% increase in mail on Monday.

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    11. Re:The difference between Amazon and Netflix by ottothecow · · Score: 4, Informative
      You know the mail moves every day right? The USPS is open 24/7

      Sure they don't drop it off at your house, and most post office customer areas are not open sundays (they probably can't stop saturday customer house for people who work), but mail that is in the system is constantly moving. If it was going to arrive on monday, it will still arive on monday (with saturday's mail).

      I wouldn't be surprised if they still send the trucks around for a daily pickup on the blue boxes on saturdays since this requires significantly less labor than actually delivering mail to every single house in the country.

      --
      Bottles.
    12. Re:The difference between Amazon and Netflix by couchslug · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Amazon products fit comfortably in UPS, Fedex, and DHL trucks.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    13. Re:The difference between Amazon and Netflix by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually people have done some studies and found that netflix starts to fuck with your DVDs if you order too many. They got sued over this a few years back in which they admitted that they were doing this, settled with lawyers (netflix customers got less than one week free subscription as payback), and changed their TOS to say something like "netflix send you DVDs when we want to, the X many out at a time plan is not actually legally binding."

      They do things like mess with your queue. A movie that is ready to ship will appear as "long wait". Your DVDs will be shipped from a shipping center across the country so that it takes 2-3 days to get to you and back, etc.

      Ending Saturday delivery will only help netflix screw its customers out of more money. One more reason I don't have a netflix subscription.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    14. Re:The difference between Amazon and Netflix by Golddess · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I could be mistaken, but I believe the last time I looked at one of those blue drop boxes near me, Sunday was not listed as a pickup day for that box. So it's reasonable to assume that if they dropped Saturday deliveries, they might also drop Saturday pickups from those drop boxes.

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    15. Re:The difference between Amazon and Netflix by hoboroadie · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Some of us non-Sabbath-Keepers find Saturday delivery useful and productive. I've had problems with delivery drivers (particularly the pinheads from the USPS) over-ruling my request for packages to be left on the porch when no one is home, and causing delays in production due to untimely delivery. On Saturdays I stand a better chance of stopping them before they leave with my stuff.

      --
      They feared that it could be used to suppress protest or support unpopular rule.
    16. Re:The difference between Amazon and Netflix by sexconker · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's nothing. When Blockbuster Online first started... $18 / month Get 3 DVDs in the mail on Monday morning. "Watch" them, and head to Blockbuster on Monday evening. At Blockbuster, turn them in and get 3 DVDs from the store (free). Get 3 DVDs in the mail on Wednesday morning. "Watch" them, and head to Blockbuster on Wednesday evening. At Blockbuster, turn them in and get 3 DVDs from the store (free). Also turn in the 3 DVDs you got from the store on Monday. ... Plus they gave you coupons each month for a free game or movie rental. And coupons for cheap popcorn and candy. Came out to about 76 DVDs a month. It was less than a quarter per DVD.

    17. Re:The difference between Amazon and Netflix by commodore64_love · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Summary read:
      Amazon has argued that it should not have to help support public services in states in which it has no physical presence

      What does that have to do with anything? Plus it's completely false. Amazon says it should not have to pay a tax to support New York's private government ~2500 miles away, but it still DOES support public services. It pays a toll for the roads (gas tax) and it pays a toll for the public mail (the postage tax) and it files income taxes with the U.S. and the California governments. I don't think a Slashdot summary should be stating politically-biased falsehoods like it did above.

      IMHO

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    18. Re:The difference between Amazon and Netflix by Grishnakh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Personally, I think this idea of ending Saturday delivery is dumb. I had heard they were considering another idea, but I guess it's been dropped because I haven't heard of it since then; the idea was to end Wednesday delivery, and keep Saturday delivery. That way, you never have to go more than 1 day without deliveries. Plus, most people are at work on Wednesdays, and not on Saturdays, so it's easier to sign for stuff then. I wish they'd go back to this idea.

    19. Re:The difference between Amazon and Netflix by BikeHelmet · · Score: 2, Insightful

      lawd that's a lot of movies in a month. Watching 3 a week is stretching it for me.

      :/

      "Watch" them, and head to Blockbuster on Monday evening.

      He's ripping them to HDD. At the end of the month, he has nearly enough movies to last a year.

  2. Jack up the price? by recoiledsnake · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why not just have a increased rate for Saturday delivery like Fedex and UPS? I don't see a reason for something to run on a loss. If Amazon's customers appreciate or expect it, either they or Amazon can pay extra for it.

    --
    This space for rent.
    1. Re:Jack up the price? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You must be some kind of pinko, to suggest a market-based solution instead of a (lightly) veiled corporate subsidy.

      In all seriousness, though, while there is a compelling public interest argument to be made in favor of the post office doing some un-economic things(and about the best chain of precedent you'll find for any US federal function, outside of war), like providing postal service to podunk towns that would have nothing otherwise; there seems to be no reason why they need to subsidize merely convenient services that have plenty of viable substitutes. If Saturday delivery costs more, offer it at a premium(or not at all, if you don't think you can make money at the new price point). People can either suck it up and wait till monday, or suck it up and pay Fedex/UPS.

    2. Re:Jack up the price? by Devrdander · · Score: 2, Informative

      First, it should be know, the USPS has become self-sufficient and has not directly received taxpayer-dollars since the early 1980s. However it is currently borrowing money from the U.S. Treasury to pay its deficits. Its building up debt, thus the drive for the change.

      Amazon offers flat rate shipping subscriptions (their Prime service), anything that costs more money to them hurts their bottom line initially until they can figure out how to adjust it later(It's an annual subscription). Just like how they are fighting this "brown bailout" which is UPS's attempt to lobby the law that prohibits fedex ground from unionizing. FedEx unionizes their workforce, and their costs go up. Then UPS can put some slack back in their profit margins. Amazon doesn't want that to happen either. Also if the cost for Saturday delivery goes up, people will be less inclined to opt in for the upgrade in shipping, and instead turn to a local retailer to get their goods in time for their weekend needs.

      Netflix is only supporting the USPS change because it'll eliminate 1/6th of their delivery/processing days, and saves them a ton of money. They haven't stated yet if they plan to lower the costs of their service to reflect the loss to the customers. Of course they try to spin it as supporting the well being of their delivery medium, but in reality it again all comes down to the bottom line.

      I personally like the option of a cheap Saturday delivery, and hope that the USPS can figure out a way to generate more revenue and keep their 6 day schedule.

    3. Re:Jack up the price? by icebraining · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I thought the viability of a public system like the USPS was a political matter.

    4. Re:Jack up the price? by spidrw · · Score: 2, Informative

      The kind of mail they're allowed to leave in your mailbox and not on your doorstep.

    5. Re:Jack up the price? by hoboroadie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't buy that "Junk-Mail-Subsidizing-First-Class" crap. If that was true, First-Class would be cheap or free, and the recyclable-paper-waste would cost more to deliver than First-Class does now.

      --
      They feared that it could be used to suppress protest or support unpopular rule.
  3. USPS isn't a State Function by CheshireCatCO · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In the past, Amazon has argued that it should not have to help support public services in states in which it has no physical presence.

    I'm having trouble seeing exactly why this is relevant, other than innuendo. State taxes don't pay for mail delivery, that's a federal function. Amazon's stance is consistent. (Whether it's morally right or wrong is a separate issue, mind you.)

    1. Re:USPS isn't a State Function by DriedClexler · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think that's referring to Amazon defending its exemption from sales taxes (as cross-state sales typically are, at least in practice), the argument being that it's not bearing its share of e.g. road upkeep costs for the products its delivering.

      Of course, I disagree with that argument, since taxes are normally completely decoupled from provision of the government service they fund, but I'm just trying to clarify what (I think) it's referring to.

      --
      Information theory is life. The rest is just the KL divergence.
    2. Re:USPS isn't a State Function by rolfwind · · Score: 4, Insightful

      State and local gasoline taxes are more than enough to upkeep roads in most cases. They also usually fund things that have nothing to do with roads. That's how it should be.

      States always want more money. Once Amazon is taxed, that means all the small internet businesses have to be taxed as well. There are so many small municipalities, especially in CA, demanding their special rate of sale's tax, that it would be hard for a small merchant to file it all.

      Of course, I'm for the apt tax replacing all this bullshit anyway, no loopholes.
      http://www.apttax.com/

    3. Re:USPS isn't a State Function by sco08y · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In the past, Amazon has argued that it should not have to help support public services in states in which it has no physical presence.

      I'm having trouble seeing exactly why this is relevant, other than innuendo.

      Another reason it's irrelevant: corporations don't pay taxes, they just pass them on to consumers and investors.

    4. Re:USPS isn't a State Function by Enry · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'll add for you that Amazon is paying the USPS for delivery. In that respect, they are paying to support services. Why should Amazon pay for police or firefighters in states where they don't have a business presence?

    5. Re:USPS isn't a State Function by cmiller173 · · Score: 2, Informative

      ... However the USPS is not a govt agency, govt funded maybe but not direct govt.

      Interesting that on USA.gov where they list all the government agencies they list the postal service. http://www.usa.gov/Agencies/Federal/All_Agencies/P.shtml

      Also my two BIL's that work for the post office are in the government retirement plan and don't get social security.

    6. Re:USPS isn't a State Function by Stupid+McStupidson · · Score: 2, Informative

      However the USPS is not a govt agency, govt funded maybe but not direct govt.

      Did you mean to say "the USPS is not a state govt agency? Because it most certainly is a federal funded, constitutionally mandated federal function, with the Postmaster General being a cabinet level position. The specific rules, funding, and post office distribution is certainly up to debate, however. Citation, plz? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postal_Clause

    7. Re:USPS isn't a State Function by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't know of a state that doesn't have a line on their income tax forms enabling an individual to remit sales tax on out-of-state purchases. The notion is no different from having Oregon (a state with no sales tax) retailers collect and remit for their non-resident customers their state of residence sales tax. It's an unrealistic logistical and administrative burden, especially for small, "out of their garage"/"mom and pop" retailers.

      The concept of a sales tax is a piss poor idea from a number of different angles. Of which includes the fact that it's horribly regressive, burdening low-income individuals relative to their income substantially more than others. Only a token gesture is made in some states to offset this fact by not taxing food and sometimes clothes. Having untold thousands of revenue collection points (each retailer) as opposed to a single point (state treasury) has got to rank rather high on the stupidity scale as well; especially when nearly all of these states have an income and/or property tax that they're collecting as well anyway. Why not just lump all of the taxation into one revenue stream, eliminate the substantial costs of collecting and administering multiple streams.

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    8. Re:USPS isn't a State Function by Totenglocke · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Of course, I'm for the apt tax replacing all this bullshit anyway, no loopholes.

      I'll read your link later, but as of now, the Fair Tax seems the best option - tax on what you spend, not on what you earn.

      www.fairtax.org

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
    9. Re:USPS isn't a State Function by ae1294 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why not just lump all of the taxation into one revenue stream, eliminate the substantial costs of collecting and administering multiple streams.

      Because then people might start to realize just how much of their money goes to prop-up 'big government (tm).

    10. Re:USPS isn't a State Function by geekoid · · Score: 2

      He also doesn't define what a transaction is, or why people who pay a tax on money they lost.

      He is taking a big 'evil' thing people don't understand and using it as a way to spread FUD.

      Taxing tranactiona tinme amount does seem like somethign we shoudl do.

      I know America isn't ready to face a the simple truth:
      The government need to generate more revenue. There really sin't any service left we can cut without dramatically undermining the countries future.

      This mean higher taxes.
      Taxing transaction might be a good start.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    11. Re:USPS isn't a State Function by godefroi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      H

      I know America isn't ready to face a the simple truth:
      The government need to generate more revenue. There really sin't any service left we can cut without dramatically undermining the countries future.

      This mean higher taxes. Taxing transaction might be a good start.

      You say that as an absolute, but I disagree. I think America isn't ready to face THIS truth:

      The people need to be responsible for themselves, and shouldn't expect others to take care of them. This means that there won't be government-funded health care, won't be government-funded welfare, won't be a "farm bill", won't be government bailouts, won't be government-funded home loans, won't be government-funded fixes when people insist on building their houses below sea level in hurricane zones.

      I'd say there are PLENTY of programs to cut. The problem is, there are too many looters and not enough producers left.

      --
      Karma: Poor (Mostly affected by lame karma-joke sigs)
    12. Re:USPS isn't a State Function by Enry · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Uhm, they are paying for Saturday delivery. By paying the USPS for delivery.

    13. Re:USPS isn't a State Function by fermat1313 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Why should Amazon pay for police or firefighters in states where they don't have a business presence?

      Because Amazon wouldn't be paying sales tax. They are just collecting tax from the customers on behalf of the state. It's the customers who are paying for services in their local area. Amazon doesn't have a problem with collecting taxes because they think they shouldn't have to pay for services, since sales taxes are always passed on to the customer. Amazon has a problem with it because not collecting sales tax gives them a huge (upwards of 10% in some areas) price advantage over local retailers.

    14. Re:USPS isn't a State Function by StikyPad · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The people need to be responsible for themselves, and shouldn't expect others to take care of them.

      And it's being responsible to pay taxes. Everyone's still taking care of "themselves," but the risk is distributed such that no one person bears a proportion larger than they could handle. That holds true whether it's fixing a sinkhole on the road in front of their house, or treating cancer, and should be patently obvious. It's the whole point of living in communities and societies; otherwise we'd just head off into the woods and fend for ourselves.

  4. It helps Netflix to end Saturday delivery by h2oliu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If there are fewer delivery days in a month, then you get fewer movies per month if you turn them around every other day. This would help Netflix's bottom line to cut delivery down to 5 days a week.

    --
    Ok, I give up, why you?
  5. I need saturday mail pickup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Monday through Friday, I leave for work before our local Post Office opens and leave from work after it closes.

    1. Re:I need saturday mail pickup by stewbacca · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because all the overpaid postal workers won't get a two day weekend, duh.

    2. Re:I need saturday mail pickup by apparently · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So you can't shove your letters in the slot after hours?

      Yeah, that works really well for sending international mail or larger domestic packages.

  6. Neflix != Amazon, and postal service == bad by enigma32 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Netflix benefits from less frequent mail delivery. (Lower costs for them)
    Amazon loses big from less frequent delivery (I frequently choose them because I can have a package here before I'd have time to go get the item in Manhattan myself).

    As for the postal service, I frequently find myself waiting in 20 minute lines, at any time of day, to pickup a package that they were incapable of delivering correctly to my residence. I'd love to see someone that has a clue about business run the postal service rather than it being run with the competence level of the DMV.

    Keep the Saturday delivery or go the way of the dodo, guys. (add Sunday delivery and be super-cool)

    1. Re:Neflix != Amazon, and postal service == bad by darjen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If the national post office was eliminated, we would have more private competition and a pretty decent chance of getting Sunday delivery. The newspaper comes on Sundays, why not the mail? They would also be more efficient while doing it. The level of service at the post office compared to UPS and Fedex is shockingly bad. Whenever I go into a UPS store there is little to no line.

    2. Re:Neflix != Amazon, and postal service == bad by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 4, Informative

      Eliminating the national post office would require a Constitutional amendment. Delivering the mail is in the U.S. Constitution.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    3. Re:Neflix != Amazon, and postal service == bad by darjen · · Score: 4, Informative

      It would be a great first step if they simply removed the federal monopoly on first class mail. That certainly wouldn't require changing the Constitution.

    4. Re:Neflix != Amazon, and postal service == bad by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 2, Informative

      Eliminating the national post office would require a Constitutional amendment. Delivering the mail is in the U.S. Constitution.

      No, Congress is empowered to establish a post office, and post roads, but they are not obligated to do so. The USPS could be eliminated without an amendment, but I hope it wouldn't be.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    5. Re:Neflix != Amazon, and postal service == bad by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The level of service at the post office compared to UPS and Fedex is shockingly bad. Whenever I go into a UPS store there is little to no line.

      I disagree. Any time I've ever had to use UPS I've gotten nothing but terrible service. Anywhere from boxes that look like someone was using them as punching bags (and the stuff inside being broken or damaged in some way), to packages being lost and delayed and the fact that they are too incompetent to just hold a package at the office so you can pick it up.

    6. Re:Neflix != Amazon, and postal service == bad by localman57 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      UPS isn't going to come to your house on a rural route in the backwoods of Kentucky and pick up a piece of shit you wrote, and put it on an airplane to Wyoming for $.44 . (credit to Jon Stewart for that quote). A properly functioning, reliable service that serves 100% of all residents everywhere is vital to a modern economy. Our post office is so good that the legal system considers proof of mailing (not delivery) as proof of service. Live in italy or mexico for 6 months, and you'll get some perspective.

    7. Re:Neflix != Amazon, and postal service == bad by raddan · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I agree, as someone who has to ship a lot of stuff around as a part of my job, we've tried a number of couriers, and I think we have a pretty good fell for the quality (timeliness, damage, convenience) of many of them. Here's what we found:
      1. FedEx, far and away the best, but expensive
      2. USPS, not always on time, but mostly reliable; premium services don't compare with FedEx; tracking isn't great
      3. UPS, usually on time, and has lots of premium services, but theft and damage are MAJOR problems. They will happily deliver a package to a wrong address (i.e., THEY got it wrong), and when that package is stolen, they will disclaim all responsibity. Their "insurance" is a fucking joke-- they have weaseled out of paying every claim we've filed.
      4. DHL is pathetic. They once cheerfully delivered a package to me that had a hole straight through the package and the contents inside. We had to request one our suppliers never use them again.
    8. Re:Neflix != Amazon, and postal service == bad by DinDaddy · · Score: 3, Funny

      USPS, not always on time, but mostly reliable; premium services don't compare with FedEx; tracking isn't great

      Shipped a package once USPS with a guaranteed delivery date (extra fee for the guaranteed shipping). Package arrived 5 days late. Attempted to collect my refund. Was told by USPS counter worker that they "did not guarantee their guarantee" and I would receive no refund.

    9. Re:Neflix != Amazon, and postal service == bad by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 5, Informative

      You do know the USPS is given a monopoly on first class mail deliver to ensure rural service is as good as urban service, correct? Otherwise, you'd end up with what we have for broadband: Some options in urban/suburban areas, no options in rural areas due to the unprovability of servicing said areas.

    10. Re:Neflix != Amazon, and postal service == bad by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Holy shit, did you even think when you typed your post?

      Screw rural residents:

      Why should people living in the backwoods of Kentucky be entitled to force me to pay for their mail service? It's their choice to live there. If they really wanted better or less expensive service they should move to a city.

      OMGS! EVERYONE EQUAL!

      Government should benefit everyone equally, not one class of people over another.

      Also, show me one farm of sufficient size to efficiently produce food for a substantial number of people. Fuck cities. They'd die overnight if food wasn't shipped into them like it's going out of style.

    11. Re:Neflix != Amazon, and postal service == bad by Loconut1389 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I had a large, used, Origin 2000 server shipped strapped to a plastic palate delivered via DHL. I swear it had been tipped over, (nearly impossible as it weighs like 300 pounds and is a very evenly weight distributed square)- all the rails were crushed, and there were dents in the top. Its a freaking palate with several inches of clearance inside the palate edges to product. How hard can it be to keep it from getting damaged.

      I've also had UPS send me servers that look like they were sat on and/or drop kicked across the country. Forget drop shipping, you get drop kicking.

    12. Re:Neflix != Amazon, and postal service == bad by Grishnakh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wrong. Removing the monopoly would mean that private companies could deliver urban mail cheaper than the USPS, and 90% of mail would move to these private carriers. The USPS, still required to deliver to rural areas (which the private companies ignore, or charge much more for) would then not have enough money to continue operating, so the rural areas wouldn't get any mail service at all in the end.

      Of course, there is a valid argument that rural areas should be required to pay more for mail service, instead of being subsidized by urban service as it is now. But allowing private companies to compete with the USPS, and not requiring them to deliver mail to rural areas while still requiring the USPS to do so, would result in the destruction of the USPS.

    13. Re:Neflix != Amazon, and postal service == bad by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I think my post is quite accurate thanks. As a business owner, I'm not going to provide service to a certain geographic region if it's not profitable. I believe it to be fact that other for-profit entities feel the same way (I don't include non-profits whose sole goal is to provide service to under-served areas). I'm sure you're aware of the Tennessee Valley Authority, which grew out of the need to provide electricity service to a majority of Tennessee residents due to the unprofitability of doing so.

      If the USPS can't provide service to both urban and rural areas while staying in the black, how do you expect private business to do the same thing (if mandated) while maintaining the same level of service? I'm sure there is cruft to cut in the USPS, but not enough to justify a health profit margin for a for-profit org.

  7. Skip Wednesday instead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's generally their junk mail drop with just flyers and other non-addressed answers.

    1. Re:Skip Wednesday instead by RotsiserMho · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That stuff only comes on Wednesday because the backlog of mail from over the weekend has finally subsided by Wednesday. If they got rid of Wednesday delivery, you'd just get the same crap on Thursday.

    2. Re:Skip Wednesday instead by Abstrackt · · Score: 2, Funny

      That stuff only comes on Wednesday because the backlog of mail from over the weekend has finally subsided by Wednesday. If they got rid of Wednesday delivery, you'd just get the same crap on Thursday.

      In that case, they'd better skip Thursday too.

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
  8. I would make it even more drastic by rolfwind · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And just have alternating days. That way one postal worker can take care of two routes. Let's face it, mail is only going to decrease. So let them do M-W-F on Route 1 and T-Th-Sa on Route 2, and flip that the next week. Express mail can be an exception. Priority mail not so much, depending on logistics.

    The USPS has been good to me and my internet business, so I'd prefer them to do well in return. IMO, this is the only way to really future proof the service. People will bitch but the rest of society just has to adapt, imo.

    1. Re:I would make it even more drastic by pavon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This makes the most sense to me, but I would add another exception - any mail that requires a signature, regardless of class, should be attempted on the next Saturday before requiring you to pick it up at the nearest post office. If it increases the cost of that particular service, that is fine with me.

      That said I don't think it is necessary to go so far right now, but if they are going to drop a day, it should be any day but Saturday.

    2. Re:I would make it even more drastic by MrLogic17 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Unions won't allow that. The reason they are focusing on Saturday, that way [nearly] all full-time union workers can keep their jobs. Saturday has been an overtime / part-time job for the new guys on the route.

      Same argument wnet for the "Drop Wednesday" plan. Keep the same number of days (5), and nobody loses their jobs.

      Now those paying attention will notice that you don't save very much if you keep the same number of workers, with the same base pay rate, same benefits, and the same number of post offices open.

  9. Why not a weekday? by cmiller173 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I would prefer to see them drop say Thursday deliveries and deliver Mon-Wed, Fri-Sat.

    1. Re:Why not a weekday? by SocialEngineer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The problem with this is the fact that it would greatly affect businesses who rely on mail services. No mail on Thursday means no bills going out, no checks coming in, etc. Also, that means people who get newspapers delivered via mail route (yes, they do that - I'm systems manager at a small locally focused paper that is doing quite well) will have to skip a day. Of course, if we lose Saturday, we lose a day, too. As far as receiving packages go, I always have mine shipped to work, anyway, so I don't have to worry about being there to sign for it.

      --
      "Better to be vulgar than non-existent" -Bev Henson
  10. BP to pay for Saturday delivery, loss in postcards by Orga · · Score: 5, Funny

    USPS filed suit against BP last Saturday in an attempt to get BP to pay for USPS Saturday delivery. The reasoning proposed is with the decrease in tourism in the gulf states fewer vacationers are sending postcards north. BREAKING NEWS: Consortium of postcard manufacturers expresses interest in joining suit.

  11. Minus one, just plain wrong by stomv · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:Minus one, just plain wrong by RotsiserMho · · Score: 3, Informative

      Because conveniently, that (incredibly biased) site only shows data through 2007 after which presumably, they started losing money. In any case, the whole point of ending Saturday delivery is to remain self-sufficient.

    2. Re:Minus one, just plain wrong by Cryptosporidium · · Score: 4, Informative

      Uh, let's revisit that idea. From the section titled "The Postal Service is self-sufficient" -- there are two columns. One is for 1942-1971 and one is for 1972-2007. Several things wrong. The most grievous is that the numbers have convenient grouped 35 years of operating costs and revenue together. The second is that your stats still show a net loss of $600 million dollars for those 35 years.

      But, addressing the more important point, the decline of demand for mail delivery services has happened in the age of the internet. Let's break those out by year instead of grouping them together in a three decade chunk. And instead of citing a website from the National Association of Letter Carriers, let's use the actual financial report from the USPS.

      Financial Highlights -- FY2009

      Observe net loss.

  12. Canada doesn't have any saturday deliveries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Not Canada Post, not FedEx, not UPS, not DHL, not Purolator. Nobody delivers on saturday except pizzerias.

    1. Re:Canada doesn't have any saturday deliveries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not true; you can receive Saturday delivery from FedEx if you are willing to pay for it.

  13. Private Industry by Manip · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If Amazon wants Saturday delivery for its clients then it can continue to offer it using third parties like FedEx. That is what happens in the UK - you get letters six days a week but only parcels five days a week; if you want parcels on a Saturday then you have to pay a private company to do the delivery which Amazon EU/UK offers.

  14. Re:A better solution by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Informative

    The US Constitution, motherfucker! have you read it?

    "Section 8 - Powers of Congress

    The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

    To borrow money on the credit of the United States;

    To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;

    To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;

    To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;

    To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States;

    To establish Post Offices and Post Roads

    ; To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;

    To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court;

    To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offenses against the Law of Nations;

    To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;

    To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;

    To provide and maintain a Navy;

    To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;

    To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

    To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;

    To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings; And

    To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof."

  15. Re:Amazon wants their cake and eat it too... by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How do you get the idea that Amazon does not pay postage (support the service that the post office provides them)?

    --
    The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
  16. Re:Amazon wants their cake and eat it too... by garyok · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yes, because it's free to put things in the post.

    Oh, wait... The Postal Service don't do it from the grace in their fairy slave hearts, they expect to get paid to deliver the goods, even on a Saturday?! Unless they pay the staff extra on a Saturday, then I can't see what USPS's problem is.

    Dunno about the US, but in the UK about 40% (so I hear) of people are single and don't have anyone waiting in all week for a big parcel to arrive. Saturday's about the only day I can get a parcel delivered to my house. Any other day, and I have to wait a couple of days before collecting it from the depot a couple of miles away.

    --
    One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors - Plato
  17. They don't need to. by AnonymousClown · · Score: 5, Informative

    That's 17% fewer movies sent and received by Netflix every week. I would expect them to also want more public holidays in a year as well

    They don't need to. From their current Terms and Conditions:

    We reserve the right to process orders and otherwise allocate and ship DVDs among our members in any manner that we, in our sole and absolute discretion, determine. In addition, we will, in our sole and absolute discretion, determine the quantity of DVDs we purchase for any particular movie, their location within our distribution network and the level of staffing and number of shipments to be processed at each distribution center.

    Every new Terms and Conditions, they're putting things in their agreement that allows them not to give you "unlimited" whatever ....

    There's verbiage in it that limits your "unlimited" online viewing too now.

    --
    RIP America

    July 4, 1776 - September 11, 2001

    1. Re:They don't need to. by DCheesi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, they can throttle you. But people get annoyed when they do that, and some even wind up canceling the service.

      Getting the USPS to drop Saturday delivery would be a way for them to reduce DVD volume without getting blamed for it.

  18. End mail delivery on Monday, Wednesday, or Friday by Zarf · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Many USicans only have Saturdays free to run errands. Ending services on Saturday is a burden to them. Ending delivery on any other day of the week would be preferable.

    --
    [signature]
  19. Charge more for junk mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If they want to make USPS more profitable, eliminate all the discounts for bulk/junk mail and make them pay first class rates.

  20. Who even understands the Post Office any more? by HerculesMO · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The argument is common, and one that even Obama has poked fun at -- the Post Office loses money.

    Let's take a step back in history folks -- and realize that the Post Office was not *designed* to make money. It was designed to facilitate the communication between long distances in a organized, logical way. It's a great reason why we have become the powerhouse that we have, because we knew we could rely on legal documents being delivered, because contracts could be signed and sent back, and the legal code behind them was always upheld.

    Fast forward to today -- the need for the post office still exists in a large fashion. I am not arguing against or for Saturday delivery, but it's just a point of annoyance for me, so I am addressing it. What other service in the world can allow you to ship a letter from one remote corner of the country to another for mere cents? The ability for citizens to mail letters and rely on their ability to reach the destination is still hugely important, and one that *should* be subsidized by our tax dollars. Until the time we go fully electronic, the post office will have a need. That time is not now. You are still "served" in person, you still have to sign contracts by hand, and a multitude of other things that have not yet caught up to the pace of technology.

    So when you think about what the post office has allowed the US to accomplish over the years of its service, take a moment to think that without it, our country would not be nearly as far along as it is, and we have a lot to thank for that. And to boot -- we still need it for the same reasons today.

    --
    The price is always right if someone else is paying.
  21. Re:Be careful what you ask for? by cob666 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Q. Amazon, can you pay some taxes here? A. No way, we don't want to operate this way. Q. Amazon, what should be we do about the spending problem and the deficit? A. Cut your services. Q. Amazon, we are going to cut the services, happy? A. NOOOOOO!

    The USPS is funded solely by the sale of postage, not tax dollars and thus has NO impact on the deficit. .

    --
    Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law - Aleister Crowley
  22. Re:Be careful what you ask for? by roman_mir · · Score: 2, Informative

    of-course, and the social security money is not used for anything else ever, it just sits there collecting the interest.

  23. Re:End mail delivery on Monday, Wednesday, or Frid by Idarubicin · · Score: 5, Informative

    Many USicans only have Saturdays free to run errands. Ending services on Saturday is a burden to them.

    How does a lack of Saturday delivery interfere with running errands? I find your comment confusing.

    For comparison, I offer the Canadian system. While delivery only occurs on Monday through Friday, postal services are often available on an extended schedule. Canada Post maintains a network of service counters (often in drug, convenience, and grocery stores) which provide parcel services, sell money orders, and supply copies of frequently-used government documents (passport applications, tax forms). These local outlets also act as pickup points for parcels which are too large for home delivery (the stuff that didn't fit in your mailbox while you were out).

    Many of these counters have extended weeknight hours (beyond typical nine-to-five business hours) and offer Saturday hours; some are even open on Sunday afternoons. (The retailers hosting the counters have probably realized that extended postal hours can attract customers.) In other words, Canadian Saturday-errand-runners have no trouble obtaining postal services, even in the absence of Saturday delivery.

    Letters and smaller parcels can, of course, be sent at any time simply by dropping in a post box.

    --
    ~Idarubicin
  24. Bullshit argument by copponex · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Did you miss the first day of economics? There's always downward pressure on prices. Any increased costs may be passed on to the consumer, but not always. The business that finds ways to absorb the tax increase without passing it on is the one that will probably sell more product.

    But since a quarter of large corporations - $50m in sales or $250m in assets - don't pay any income taxes at all due to loopholes and offshore sheltering schemes, you're right: if they ever started to pay taxes, prices might go up.

    And if corporations had to pay taxes for the infrastructure that enables them to be in business, I don't think that would be unfair. And if a business can't afford the burden of the infrastructure, guess what: they shouldn't be in business unless they serve to lower costs of vital services for the rest of the economy. And even then, since they exist entirely at the grace of tax payers, they should have no right to any amount of privacy.

    1. Re:Bullshit argument by jriding · · Score: 2, Informative

      And where would they be moving to??
      "Global economy" Fine sent from Europe. Guess what tariff on the goods coming in from out of the country would out way the "cheaper" cost of the goods. So consumers in the US would still by at a higher price then from another country. So the company that just moved would then close down.

      Why do you think in a global economy most companies that do business globally have an office or plant located in that country.
      So it can be made there and avoid the import costs.

      I always did love the straw man of "well then we will move and people will be out of a job".
      The Mining industry is claiming that big time if they are taxed they will move, and people will loose jobs.

      How does one move a mine to a different state and still have the product (gold, diamonds, silver, etc) at the bottom of the mine?

      --
      love the taste, hate the texture
    2. Re:Bullshit argument by copponex · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The article states that, overall, two thirds of corporations don't pay income taxes, meaning that large corporations are actually better at paying taxes than other corporations.

      Those corporations barely make any money - they are created mostly for legal reasons. How are they going to pay taxes?

      Claiming that large corporations don't pay taxes because of loopholes and sheltering schemes is patently false.

      That's a parroted statement from the conservative think tank mentioned in the article, which has every reason to continue the charade about "net losses." Take a look at a more recent article:

      http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/16/AR2009011602602.html

      Most of America's largest publicly traded corporations -- including several that are receiving billions of dollars from U.S. taxpayers to finance their recovery -- have set up offshore operations that could help them avoid paying U.S. taxes on their profits, a government study released yesterday found.

      American International Group, Bank of America, Citigroup and Morgan Stanley are among the companies that are getting bailed out by U.S. taxpayers while having subsidiaries in locations where they can avoid paying U.S. taxes, according to the Government Accountability Office.

      Of the 100 largest public companies, 83 do business in tax-haven hotspots like the Cayman Islands, Bermuda and the British Virgin Islands, where they can move their income into tax-free accounts. ...The Treasury estimates that it loses $100 billion a year in tax revenue as a result of companies shipping their income off shore, and congressional leaders are vowing to introduce legislation forcing big companies to pay full freight.

      The GAO did not independently review company transactions to see if the companies purposely created tax-haven businesses to avoid U.S. taxes. But it said that historically, offshore subsidiaries are used for reducing tax costs and shielding transactions from public view.

      So, 83% of the Fortune 100 does a lot of business in "tax-haven hotspots.. historically used for reducing tax costs and shielding transactions from public view." Interested in evading US taxes through loopholes? You can even go shopping for holding companies: http://www.lowtax.net/

      Kudos on reinforcing your biases through sheer repetition of lies. Oh, and the credulity! I'll bet you're never out of stock of that, eh?

  25. Bingo! by davebarnes · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The USPS is running a huge deficit and dropping Saturday delivery does not fix the problem.
    The problem is falling revenue and too many employees.

    --
    Dave Barnes 9 breweries within walking distance of my house
  26. Wimps by Moraelin · · Score: 4, Funny

    The difference between Amazon and Netflix is that Netflix product fits comfortably in a mailbox.

    This just tells me that USPS employees are wimps ;)

    Seriously, at one point, after getting used to ordering games and movies from Amazon and finding the DVD case in an envelope that just about fit through the mailbox slot, I order IIRC City Of Villains. The game was packed in one of those big cardboard boxes, instead of the DVD cases we've got for the last half a decade. It was easily twice as thick as the mailbox slot. The German post employee had obviously not been deterred by that, and had managed to actually shove the damned thing half-way through that narrow slot.

    I had gained proper appreciation for the awesomeness of said employee while trying to get it out. It was so firmly jammed in the slot, that it wouldn't go either forward or back at all, no matter how hard I pulled or shoved. I had to tear the box apart, partially working through the slot at that, and retrieve its contents piece-wise. It wasn't just that the cardboard box was thicker than the slot, but the sum of what was inside, you know, manual and CDs and all, was actually thicker on the whole than the slot.

    (And while I'm at being awed by employees, having to work through that narrow slot also gave me a new perspective and a deep respect for gynecologists;))

    I'm thinking it must have been the kind of guy who, when asked to fit various geometric figures through various shaped holes in kindergarten, thought it was a test of strength.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.