Slashdot Mirror


Tattoos For the Math and Science Geek?

An anonymous reader writes "I've been thinking of getting a sleeve of math and science tattoos for quite a while now. With the money saved up, the only question remaining is, what equations/ideas should I get? I know for certain that I'm going to include some of Maxwell's equations, and definitely Ohm's Law. So, if you were going to put a tribute to the great math and science minds on your body forever, which ones would you choose?"

115 of 1,186 comments (clear)

  1. Not me but... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Someone I know recently got a lambda tattooed on his finger. Now he can bind people into expressions just by raising his middle digit.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    1. Re:Not me but... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Gimbo indeed, for it is him.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:Not me but... by blue_teeth · · Score: 3, Funny

      Girl in a tattoo shop: I want a small animal tattooed on my thigh. How much?

      Tattoo Guy: Rabbit, Tiger or Dog - $10 each. Giraffe is free!!

  2. Before you do it by mangu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Think twice. Do you *really* think this will be so important to you forever?

    1. Re:Before you do it by TheKidWho · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Even worse, what if we find out the laws are wrong?

    2. Re:Before you do it by mabersold · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Indeed. Remember, tastes change, but tattoos are permanent. Think that over a few times before getting one.

    3. Re:Before you do it by TheCarp · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, if he saved up the money for a whole sleeve either a) he is paid ridiculously (or rather well with exceptionally few expenses) or b) he has thought about it for at least a few weeks.

      I mean, if he was going for a big cock on his forhead, maybe $60 or so, then I would agree but... a person saving up for a whole sleeve has at least found out how much that costs and been saving up. I guess I am assuming that its a decent artist and going to be a bit more flourish than just written equations in a standard font (I would guess just having some guy scroll a whole bunch of equations on your arm would be pretty cheap overall if you agreed not to tell anyone who did it)

      I have a small tatoo that I want to get, I don't need to save up cash for it, but, I have been thinking about it on and off for about 3 years, and havn't found an artist or posted on slashdot for advice... I imagine this one has been stewing a while.

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    4. Re:Before you do it by digitalsushi · · Score: 2
      --
      slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
    5. Re:Before you do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      A tattoo is so long-lasting as to be next to permanent. It will still be visible 40 years from now. If you're talking laser removal, that's more expensive than getting the tattoo in the first place, can hurt like fuck, and often still leaves it obvious that something was once there when it's as large as a sleeve so you can just compare it to the other arm.

    6. Re:Before you do it by drewhk · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's why you never should tattoo physics laws, just mathematical theorems -- they change rarely.

    7. Re:Before you do it by Nerdfest · · Score: 5, Funny

      if he was going for a big cock on his forhead, maybe $60

      Crap. I got completely ripped off on mine.

    8. Re:Before you do it by bensode · · Score: 3, Informative

      Hotlink didnt work ... try this link instead:

      http://www.funatiq.com/simply-funny/crazy-math-tattoo/

      --
      "Keep at least 3-6 full bottles of hard alcohol on hand, a 2 week resignation notice,..." - Poetmatt
    9. Re:Before you do it by Another,+completely · · Score: 4, Funny

      do you *really* think that the laws of physics will ever be less important?

      Right, but which of those rules won't change. F=ma? Good approximation for large, slow things, but not actually true since we found out about the speed of light. What happens when we explain dark matter and dark energy? Physics is all subject to change, since it tries to approximate a set of rules that we aren't really sure about. Mathematics is constant because it writes its own rules.

      The perfect tattoo: in a single 72-point font, the last digit of Pi.

      Backup plan: your five top choices for laws of physics that we all know to be true today, but that we will know to be false before you die. Then you can cross them out as they are disproven.

    10. Re:Before you do it by hoggoth · · Score: 3, Funny

      I just bought a bottle of wine from a cashier with a very large interesting tattoo running the entire length of his arm. It had Chinese lettering over an interesting background of the Sun, Moon, and other elements.
      I asked him what it said and he looked very sad and replied 'It says don't get a tattoo when you're drunk'.

      I didn't have the heart to press him for the real translation because he looked like it was too embarrassing.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    11. Re:Before you do it by Gravitron+5000 · · Score: 3, Funny

      The perfect tattoo: in a single 72-point font, the last digit of Pi.

      The last 2 digits are 42.

    12. Re:Before you do it by nedgofast · · Score: 3, Insightful

      FICKS LAW OF DIFFUSION. That is what is going to happen to your tattoo as you age, until it looks like a bruise.

    13. Re:Before you do it by Peach+Rings · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In that case, definitely the most beautiful and famous theorem you can come up with is Euler's identity. e^(i*Pi) = -1.

    14. Re:Before you do it by Gravitron+5000 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I mean, if he was going for a big cock on his forhead, maybe $60 or so, then I would agree but...

      Note that no tattoo was mentioned in that sentence ...

    15. Re:Before you do it by Grishnakh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They ARE wrong, especially Ohm's Law. They're very, very good approximations for most cases, but they're not exactly correct. Even Einstein's equations are probably wrong, and don't agree with actual results in navigation of space probes: see the Pioneer Anomaly.

      If you want equations that are exactly correct, stick to proven mathematical theorems, like a^2 + b^2 = c^2, not equations describing physics.

    16. Re:Before you do it by LoRdTAW · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Asking Slashdot alone for ink advice means he/she is still not sure what to get. I have a bunch of friends with ink. Each of them thought the whole thing through and two have even gone as far as mocking up the art in Photoshop. If you are unsure of what to get you need to give it more thought, PERIOD.

      He/she also better hope that they have a competent artist. It never hurts to search out reputable tattoo shops or ask people who you see with great ink work (they should be more than happy to tell you). I know people who have been victim of just going to any old shop and getting crap work done. And avoid the friend of a friend who does his/her work out of their home or apartment. Either they suck, are slow as hell or disappear before they even start to fill it in and have some or all of the money (I know one case of each). Find a reputable shop with a reputable artist. Sometimes you have to wait a long time (weeks/months/years) before you get in the chair. But if its going to stick with you for the rest of your life you better know the quality of the artist.

    17. Re:Before you do it by shentino · · Score: 2, Informative

      Which is precisely what will happen if your mom forces you to get it removed and then bills you for the procedure by taking it out of your allowance for the next 10 years.

      Which just goes to show you, if you're a minor, make sure your parents are ok with it.

    18. Re:Before you do it by jsveiga · · Score: 4, Funny

      Also consider the possibility that this could get you in trouble in a math/physics exam. I thought I'd never go back to a classroom, but was pushed into a post-grad course - and was prohibited to use my old faithful HP49G on the financial/accounting exams "because it is alphanumeric and can be used for cheating"! I had to borrow a 30 year old 12c, but you won't be able to borrow a clean pair of arms.

    19. Re:Before you do it by daeley · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We're supposed to be logical and have superior reasoning abilities, and there's absolutely nothing logical or reasonable about getting ink permanently injected into your skin.

      Yes, because making snap, blanket statements about people's lifestyle choices is the epitome of logic and reason.

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    20. Re:Before you do it by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Think twice. Do you *really* think this will be so important to you forever?

      A good test is to think about your favorite thing when you were one half your current age. If you had that tatooed on you today, would you be happy about it? Your future self may feel the same about your current fashion interests.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    21. Re:Before you do it by jedrek · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We're supposed to be logical and have superior reasoning abilities, and there's absolutely nothing logical or reasonable about getting ink permanently injected into your skin.

      That's the most common FUD you hear about geeks and nerds. In reality, geeks characterize themselves with poor social skills, a simple single-mindedness that often misses the forest for the trees and an inability to treat viewpoints other than their own as valid.

      Your post is symptomatic of that kind of thinking. There are logical reasons to get tattoos, your inability to realize is pathetic.

    22. Re:Before you do it by mzs · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Also what if you ever live in a culture with a dim view of tattoos. It could lead to you not being allowed in certain places or keep you from getting a job. The only thing I would ever consider getting a tattoo of is my name on my chest and my blood type and severe allergy in a couple of languages on my for arm.

    23. Re:Before you do it by Zerth · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you want art, get it on paper or canvas so you can pass it down to your descendants, not something that's destined to die when you do

      Apparently you have never heard of a process called "tanning". Some of us still have grand-dad's WWI tattoos, nicely framed.

    24. Re:Before you do it by Gulthek · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Sounds like you've never gotten a tattoo. Before you get one you build up all this inherent meaning and long-term significance to the tattoo. Afterwards, you realize that it's just a cool picture (or phrase, whatever) that you wanted. Even if times and tastes change it's a cool link to who you were back when you got it.

    25. Re:Before you do it by brian0918 · · Score: 3, Informative

      On the contrary - all laws are true within their context. And that will be true of all laws discovered in the future. There will never be a law in the future which you could definitely say will "always be true", as that would require omniscience, which is impossible. So truth requires context, and all laws are true.

      For the same reason, if I claim to be a soothsayer, and accurately predict specific global events far into the future, it would not mean that I am speaking the truth. There is no conceivable means by which I could have known that those events would have occurred. I simply guessed correct, but my statements were not true. Truth is the product of the recognition of reality - so with no possible means by which I could have recognized future events, I cannot speak truth about them.

      Even your mathematical truth, e.g. Pythagoras' theorem, is only true in the context of Euclidean geometry.

    26. Re:Before you do it by HeckRuler · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And I guess this is the important distinction between scientists and engineers. Whereas scientists will care about if an equation holds near the center of a black hole, the engineer is willing to define such scenarios as out of scope. The scope for scientists is unlimited, the scope for engineers depends on the product.
      And anon specifically asked for math and science geekery, so you've got a good point. If you want a scientific tattoo, stay away from Ohms law. If you want an engineering tattoo, go for it, get it done, and close the ticket.

    27. Re:Before you do it by severoon · · Score: 4, Informative

      Um, if you're gonna get it tattoo'd, you probably want to go with the more traditional form of: e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0. This single equation shows a relationship between 5 important mathematical constants, as opposed to the other form, which just shows 3 (I don't think -1 qualifies, as i is the more fundamental).

      Or, you could go with the more general form: e^(i*theta) = cos(theta) + i*sin(theta).

      I might also go with the Euler product form of the Riemann zeta function, arguably the greatest unsolved problem in all of mathematics: sigma(n=1, infinity, n^-s) = pi(p prime, inv(1 - p^-s)).

      I wouldn't worry about putting stuff on your arm that might get proven wrong—it doesn't mean F=m*a isn't a significant step in the evolution of human thought just because Einstein improved upon it. Speaking of Einstein, how about the Minkowski invariance relation (I think that's what it's called?): s^2 = x^2 + y^2 + z^2 + (i*c*t)^2.

      Another significant idea worth memorializing is Godel's Incompleteness Theorem...you'd have to find a form using logic notation.

      Finally, you might think about getting N E R D C O R E across your knuckles...

      --
      but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
    28. Re:Before you do it by spazdor · · Score: 3, Insightful

      mark of sub-average intellect

      You mean, like, it identifies him as the type of person to go around making dumb assumptions about people whose choices are different from his?

      --
      DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    29. Re:Before you do it by mea37 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you fire a cannon, measure where the projectile lands, and conclude that the difference between that and the value calculated by Newton's equations has anythnig to do with relativity, then you have either a very powerful cannon or a very powerful imagination.

    30. Re:Before you do it by Idbar · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Well... I guess you can always start with 3.14 and keep adding decimals with time, as you feel more confident about having tattoos.

    31. Re:Before you do it by Abcd1234 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Bad test. I'm far more likely to like something when I'm 40 that I liked when I was 20 than I am to like something when I'm 20 that I liked when I was 10.

    32. Re:Before you do it by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A good test is to think about your favorite thing when you were one half your current age.

      Irrelevant. If he is say, 26 (or anything in that ballpark, or greater), this is crazy. You are comparing the decision making abilities and foresight of a 13 year-old child to those of an adult. The poster has certainly been thinking this over and wants to get at tattoo. No one is advising him to get a dragon screwing a pentagram on his forehead and skulls and swear words on his hands. There's nothing wrong with a tattoo (especially a clever one) if it is well done and located where it can be either displayed or hidden as desired. Live a little, and don't worry about every single thing you do today being so significant as to possibly, maybe, some day, somehow completely ruining your life.

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    33. Re:Before you do it by demonlapin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I am open-minded and willing to believe that the guy with sleeves and a mullet is not a moron once he proves it, but he's going to have a lot more work than the guy with short hair and a suit.

    34. Re:Before you do it by morari · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hm... You know what, I think I'd be okay with a Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtle tattoo. Thanks for the advice!

      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    35. Re:Before you do it by Abstrackt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Really!?!? Tattoos don't wash off, and should not simply be applied on a whim??? Thank!!!!!!!!1 And thanks to everyone who modded this insightful! Maybe you can answer my question: is water a good beverage, and should I consume it, or other beverages based on water? Thanks, because this is not plainly obvious to everyone!

      Funny, but according to the American Society of Dermatologic Surgery about 50% of people with a tattoo eventually want it removed.

      People do impulsive, stupid things all the time, tattoos are no different. That's why you should always think before you ink.

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    36. Re:Before you do it by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ...but he's going to have a lot more work than the guy with short hair and a suit.

      You've obviously never met a business major...

    37. Re:Before you do it by MoonBuggy · · Score: 2, Informative

      If anyone was wondering, that appears to be a Schrödinger equation.

  3. Euler's identity by butterflysrage · · Score: 5, Insightful

    0=e^(i*pi)+1

    --
    the preceding post was not spell checked... suck it.
    1. Re:Euler's identity by DudeTheMath · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's why I love that particular expression: addition, multiplication, exponentiation, the additive identity, the multiplicative identity, equality, everybody's two favorite irrationals, and the imaginary unit, all in one beautiful package.

      --
      You save only 59 seconds over 8 miles by going 75 instead of 65. Do you really have to pass that guy? Do the Math!
  4. Euler's Identity, Entropy & Gaussian Distribut by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Personally, I've always enjoyed the beauty of Euler's identity, any form of Gaussian (normal) distribution which has a standard form here and entropy in regards to information theory. Of course, these are just personal favorites -- the last two because I am a computer scientist with so much college work hinging on them. You probably have personal favorites in chemistry or physics or another field even. Honestly, the loan formula is probably one of the most widely used and life changing formulas in the United States today -- especially given the recent financial crisis. I think it would be best for you to draw up your own formulas in a geometric display rather than someone else's symbols. I suppose that would require extreme precision on the end of the artist and also introduce interesting problems with the elasticity of your skin ... but I'm one for originality especially if you're about to mark yourself in a relatively permanent way.

    --
    My work here is dung.
  5. Don't ask for other people's opinions. by Ed+Bugg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you don't know what you want then just wait until you do. One of the worst things you can do for a tattoo is ask what other people think you should get. You'll end up with something that they want and it may be cool now but years down the road it won't mean anything to you.

    Tattoo's are suppose to be for life. If it's something that you foresee down the road that you'll not be interested in and go "why did I ever do that, ugh that's so yesterday" it wasn't a very good idea.

    --
    -- Ed Bugg --You have freedom of choice, but not of consequences.--
    1. Re:Don't ask for other people's opinions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Do you discount ever asking people's opinions on non-technical issues? Sure, the semi-permanence is a factor, but your argument applies to pretty much anything. When I went to buy a house -- which is a fairly big commitment -- I liked having my dad's (and others') opinion; when I go clothes shopping, it's much better having friend along whose tastes you trust; if I want to get a tattoo, there's nothing wrong with asking for ideas. I don't think asking slashdot is going to lead to him feeling peer pressure to get certain tattoos suggested here, which seems to be what you're getting at.

      In fact, I've been thinking of getting a math related tattoo for a while now and just haven't had the perfect thing come up. My two ideas that I've been trying to develop are something involving the unit circle -- and perhaps its relationship to the Fourier transform, or waveforms and therefore music -- and maybe a diagram related to harmonic partitioning.

  6. Re:Quite simply, by drewhk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It is better to tattoo P=NP, because you still can modify it later, if the opposite gets proven (just strike trough the equality symbol).

  7. the empty set by Saint+Stephen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The coolest math tattoo you could get would be nothing at all. Just hold up your arm and say "it's the empty set" and have them marvel at your coolness.

    Seriously, tattoos are lame. Resist the urge. It's going to be an ugly green smear you will regrat.

    1. Re:the empty set by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Seriously, tattoos are lame.

      Tattoos aren't in and of themselves lame. People get all sort of lame tattoos, however. There's an awful lot of really beautiful stuff out there too.

      It's going to be an ugly green smear you will regrat (sic).

      You're largely thinking of low-quality ones done in pen ink by some guy in a back room. Those tend to be real crap jobs that over time look like shit.

      Modern tattoos done by a qualified artist are an entirely different animal in terms of how they look, and how they hold up over time.

      And, really, if the sum total you have to add is "tattoos are lame", why are you even bothering to comment? You obviously have nothing better to contribute to the topic.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:the empty set by xednieht · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Nothing screams (or bleats) "I'm a sheep" like getting a tatto in 2010. Want to do something more rewarding personally and socially... sponsor a child's education in a third world country. Bring math to another mind.

      --

      Hope is the currency of fools
  8. Quaternions and Euler Angles!!! by EMB+Numbers · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You definitely want Quaternions and Euler Angles:
    The story behind Quaternions justifies permanent ink if any math theorem ever did: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quaternion

  9. Fermat's last theorem... by malakai · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et generaliter nullam in infinitum ultra quadratum potestatem in duos eiusdem nominis fas est dividere cuius rei demonstrationem mirabilem sane detexi. Hanc BRACCHIUMis exiguitas non caperet.

    with one small change...

  10. Beta mu pi... by WilyCoder · · Score: 4, Funny

    In the greek alphabet:

    beta mu pi integral of e^x

    which gives you

    ButtSex

  11. Re:Quite simply, by jockeys · · Score: 4, Funny

    P=NP? die, heretic scum!

    --

    In Soviet Russia jokes are formulaic and decidedly non-humorous.
  12. Let me see. by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Tattoos hurt, they endanger your health, they are expensive, and most of all they are superficial. AKA they are for looks only.
    Gee... At one time only drunk sailors thought this was a good idea and now you want to show how geeky you are with them?
    Might I suggest Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica the full text of course.
    Bazinga!

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    1. Re:Let me see. by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Tattoos hurt, they endanger your health, they are expensive, and most of all they are superficial. AKA they are for looks only.

      OK, yes, they hurt. That's true.

      As far as endangering your health, it means you're going to the wrong damned shop. Any tattoo place that doesn't have an autoclave, and single-use needles should cause you to flee. I've never seen an artist not using latex gloves, not using sterile gear, and not using ink in little disposable cup that get tossed when they're done. Any modern shop is actually very clean, and if it isn't, don't go there.

      As to being purely superficial, lots of people get tattoos that have a strong meaning to them (and, admittedly, lots don't). Some people get tattoos so that other people can see them and say "wow, he's got a tattoo, cool". Others get them entirely for themselves -- you can't see any of mine unless I want them to be seen. You're making absurd generalizations -- if 40% of Gen-Xers are sporting ink, there's almost no generalization you can accurately make about why people get them.

      Somehow I knew a story about tattoos on Slashdot would trot out a bunch of people who know absolutely nothing on the topic. Now everybody gets to make categorical statements they can't support with anything but opinion.

      Not everything outside of your experience is bad, or stupid. Just something you don't know about.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:Let me see. by MightyYar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think by "superficial", he means that they are purely decorative - even if of some sentimental value to the wearer.

      And this is true, but I wouldn't tell someone not to wear their wedding ring just because it is superficial.

      I'd be much more concerned about the expense of laser removal once the tattoo fad passes.

      And if you don't think that this is a fashion fad, may I interest you in some vintage mid-90s facial piercings? You'll never need cosmetic earlobe repair surgery, because giant, comical rings embedded in your earlobes will be cool forever.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    3. Re:Let me see. by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >As to being purely superficial, lots of people get tattoos that have a strong meaning to them (and, admittedly, lots don't).

      So? That breakup with that one girl has a pretty strong meaning, but it doesn't mean you should permanently remind yourself of it on your skin. There's no shortage of regrettable ink that starts with the phrase "This meant a lot to me."

      Strong feelings or "deep meaning" don't necessarily justify anything.

      >Somehow I knew a story about tattoos on Slashdot would trot out a bunch of people who know absolutely nothing on the topic.

      Or it would attract know-it-alls who would come in the thread and be dismissive without adding to the discussion. Kudos to you!

    4. Re:Let me see. by D+Ninja · · Score: 3, Informative

      Somehow I knew a story about anything on Slashdot would trot out a bunch of people who know absolutely nothing on the topic.

      Fixed that for you. (Now, do I get modded Flamebait or Insightful...that's the real question.)

    5. Re:Let me see. by ChrisLeif · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Mayo Clinic says that there are health problems even if everything is done correctly: http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/tattoos-and-piercings/MC00020

    6. Re:Let me see. by pongo000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Somehow I knew a story about tattoos on Slashdot would trot out a bunch of people who know absolutely nothing on the topic.

      Who's to say that some of the naysayers have done their research and actually know what they are talking about? I don't believe a therapist that specializes in suicide needs to have necessarily experienced suicide. So you are into tattoos...your expert opinion isn't necessarily better than one who doesn't have tattoos but have done the research. The experience of getting a tattoo doesn't make one an expert in tattoos.

  13. Seriously? by sean_nestor · · Score: 5, Insightful
    In what way will having these tattoos enhance your existence? Do you really foresee finding it "cool" ten years from now? Or twenty? If you have to ask what it is you want tattooed, that should be sign enough that it isn't something you want permanently engraved into your skin.

    Think of how dignified those tattoos will look when you age and your whole body looks like Reagan's neck. Do you really want to explain to your grandkids why you thought a math equation or Mighty Mouse or a kanji character that means "desk" was something that held enough meaning that it required you to permanently scar your body with it?

    This applies to everyone who resolves to get a tattoo before deciding what it is of, btw.

    1. Re:Seriously? by east+coast · · Score: 2, Informative

      I agree that if you don't know what you want to get you just shouldn't be seriously entertaining the idea of getting a tattoo. That said...

      I've never regretted any of my tattoo work. Well, I sometimes think I should have made one bigger. As for explaining them? I'll simply tell the tykes that I like them. Beyond that I don't think I should have to fit your ideals on what's exceptable.

      No, they do not make me tougher. I never expected that.
      They do not make me stick out as an individual. I got them for myself. They can't even be seen by those around me in normal circumstances.
      They "enhance" my existence because I wanted them and I'm happy with them. You've never done anything that you like because it makes you happy?
      Tattoos are not permanent. Where does this myth come from?

      Now, how did giving a lecture on something that anyone here already knows possibly enhance your existence? Why such the rant against tattoo work?

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    2. Re:Seriously? by Fitch · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Having suffered from an alcohol induced lack of judgement and a poorly executed arm band which I am now in the process of chemically fading so it can be fixed, I have to echo this sentiment. If you aren't 100% sure what you want, then you don't want a tat bad enough to get one.

      Asking anyone else for suggestions of what you should scrawl on your skin for the rest of your life is a recipe for disaster in the highest possible magnitude.

      .

  14. Science Tattoo Emporium by nacturation · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  15. The fallout symbol by swm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I knew a guy who had the fallout symbol tattooed across his left shoulder blade,
    maybe 4 inches across, in all its black and yellow glory.
    I asked him why, but I don't recall his response.

    He did allow that reading physics textbooks in coffee shops was a good way to pick up girls.

  16. I like the fermata symbol by mollog · · Score: 4, Funny

    I like musicians who get the fermata symbol tattooed on their bodies. (Hold me.)

    --
    Best regards.
    1. Re:I like the fermata symbol by ricosalomar · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've always had a rule that I personally can't get a tattoo until I look good with my shirt off... yeah, I'm still waiting.

      I did that, about 14 years ago. Tattoo looks fine now. But I scare people when I take off my shirt.

  17. If you want to be different, don't by damn_registrars · · Score: 3, Funny

    Come on, the math is simple here. There are six billion people on the planet right now. How many of them have tattoos already? The probability of you coming up with a tattoo that someone else doesn't already have is nearly zero.

    In other words if you get a tattoo, someday later you'll meet someone else who has the same one, or someone who knows someone who has it. Then you'll realize that your attempt at "individuality" was a failure. At which point hopefully you went to a clean enough shop that you didn't pick up hepatitis in the process.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  18. Get a fractal by ALeavitt · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Get a full sleeve of the Mandelbrot set drawn with (literally) painstaking detail and accuracy. That should keep you and your tattoo artist busy for a while.

    --
    This sig has been stolen. Return it to its original user for a reward.
  19. Don't by tool462 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Forget the tattoo. Just stick with t-shirts from ThinkGeek or whatever like the rest of us do.
    Someday when the anti-intellectual revolution comes and Sarah Palin is looking for some fresh necks for her guillotine (aka "Freedom Slicer"), your elitist tattoo will get you killed.

    Am I joking? Sometimes I don't even know.

  20. Indeed. by IANAAC · · Score: 3, Insightful
    And not only that, he's only got a "theme", not the content. If you have to ask for ideas, it's probably not something you've completely thought through.

    But then again, I'm an old coot that never got the tattoo thing.

  21. Re:Newton's Laws by trashbird1240 · · Score: 2, Funny

    And make sure no one has trademark rights to or a patent on the one you choose: don't use Ax=\lamda x or Match.com may sue your left shoulder.

    This is my way of saying that although I declined to get my own tattoo, I'm glad that you're thinking of something intellectually worthy instead of getting an Apple, Inc tattoo or something else terribly impermanent. I actually read a b log post from a disgruntled "lifelong Mac user" who had recently switched to Ubuntu; he had an Apple tattoo.

  22. Re: get a brand instead by waambulance · · Score: 2, Funny

    not only will you be cooler than anybody who has a tattoo (its true!) - you can feel safe in the knowledge that your "individualism" cant be questioned. -0.

  23. Smith Chart by TrisexualPuppy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A guy that I once met had a tattoo of a Smith Chart. Smart RF guy. Definitely dedicated to the field. ;)

    1. Re:Smith Chart by Peach+Rings · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Don't mod me for flamebait but I think that really looks bad. Tattoos rarely look good in their prime, and always end up faded and smudged. They don't make you look tough or interesting, just trashy.

    2. Re:Smith Chart by JWSmythe · · Score: 4, Insightful

          It really depends on the tattoo, and how it was intended to look. Other factors include how the person takes care of themselves. A lot of people don't consider, "how will this look in 30 years." The same goes for body piercings. How will it all look when you're collecting your kids from school, when your grandkids are born, or when you're 90+ years old in a nursing home. Likewise, a sleeve (like the article asks) it may seem like a great idea, until you get a job somewhere in the Southern US, at a company with a strict policy about visible tattoos.

          I've known folks who had needed to wear long sleeves year round, because they loved the idea of getting a tattoo that everyone would see and appreciate, a decade before. It's all fun and games until it's 110+ degrees outside, and you wish you could toss off the shirt before getting into the oven previously known as "your car", except the office "no visible tattoo" policy extends to everywhere "office" including the parking lot and anywhere visible from the parking lot.

          That's not to say don't get one. Just consider what the future results could be. Folks do all kinds of crazy things to themselves. There are a whole bunch of body modifications that can be (and are) done. Is a face tattoo, or even math equations from your ears to your fingertips really the best way to express yourself?

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    3. Re:Smith Chart by Culture20 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The "no visible tattoo" policy is the antithesis of the 1st Amendment. Stop giving corporations more power than the government has.

      Or the "no visible tattoo" policy is the heart of the 1st Amendment. Stop giving the government more power than it should have. I think the only people that could win a "no visible tatto" lawsuit would be survivors of the holocaust.

    4. Re:Smith Chart by Abcd1234 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They don't make you look tough or interesting, just trashy.

      To you.

      I actually think it looks pretty nice. An abstract, pleasant-looking pattern, without going all stereotypically tribal.

      As an aside, they aren't supposed to make you "look tough or interesting". They're supposed to be an outward expression of personal values through art. If you don't like that, I suggest staying away from music, books, and other artforms, as apparently that's not your thing.

    5. Re:Smith Chart by Culture20 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Being discharged from a company for being a bigot is a consequence of your speech.

      Having to wear long sleeves at work is elimination of your right to speak, no matter what you have to say.

      Being discharged from a company for [saying something] is a consequence of your speech.
      Being discharged from a company for [displaying something] is a consequence of your "speech".
      Having to wear long sleeves at work is good sense if displaying tattoos get you discharged.

  24. Don't do it! by Average_Joe_Sixpack · · Score: 5, Funny

    in the 90s I got a tattoo of the solar system on my back and brontosaurus tattoo on my chest. now both are incorrect :(

    1. Re:Don't do it! by canajin56 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      He's making a joke about how it's regarded as incorrect. However, he doesn't really know what's he's talking about ;) The Brontosaurus is widely held to not exist, by the non-paleontologist community. There are two reasons: The first and most commonly held reason is that the original Brontosaurus reconstruction was a composite, and got the head pretty wrong. However, this was resolved a long time ago, so unless his tattoo from the 90's is from the 1890's, I'm sure he got the head right. (Besides which, creating composite reconstructions when bones are missing is an acceptable practice in the field, so long as you acknowledge this fact when you publish! Brontosaurus is not the first, nor the last, dinosaur to have inaccurate reconstructions at some point. Many dinosaurs even today are best-guess composites). So, though the Brontosaurus might not have looked like the earliest drawings (from 100 years ago!) it still existed. The second is an issue of taxonomy. Brontosaurus's original scientific name was Brontosaurus Excelsus. However, in 1903 it was argued that it's not different enough from the Aptosaurus genus to get it's own genus. So, the scientific name was changed to Aptosaurus Excelsus, instead. However, Brontosaurus was already in the lexicon. So, that became its common name. Within the field, Brontosaurus is an accepted synanym, though the scientific name is preferred (as always). Nobody would laugh at my ignorance if I claimed to own a cat, rather than the "correct" term "felis cattus", though in a scientific paper the scientific name would be preferred. In 1989 there was a bit of a stink over the USPS putting a "Brontosaurus" on a stamp. People said it promote scientific illiteracy to put the wrong name on the stamp. However, this is no more incorrect than putting a Bald Eagle labeled "Bald Eagle" (rather than "Haliaeetus leucocephalus") on a stamp. Outside of a scientific settings, there's nothing wrong with using the common name of a species. (And, in fact, Brontosaurus Excelsus is still an accepted synonym for the scientific name). Even in a scientific setting, it's usually not frowned upon to use the common name, once you've used the scientific name to make it clear what species you are writing about. One might put "felis cattus (cat)" and from then on refer to them as cats, without complaint.

      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
  25. File under "selfish" by damn_registrars · · Score: 2, Insightful
    So you've saved up some money and you want to show the world how important science and math are to you. You've chosen for some odd reason to do that by purchasing something that will only benefit yourself. I would suggest you consider ways that your money could be used to help more people further or enter science:
    • Donate to a local museum
    • Donate to a local school to buy textbooks or supplies
    • Donate to a favorite research group or cause
    • Use it to buy a lobbyist's time in DC
    • Use it to buy a journal / magazine subscription for a nearby school that means something to you

    Are just a few ways that you could use that money to make a difference in science that will help others. When you die your tattoo will eventually rot away with the rest of your body. But if you sponsored something that helped science or math progress, people would know of you for some time.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  26. Re:The Planets' Symbols by tsalmark · · Score: 2, Funny

    So the next time I see a sun tattoo between a girls shoulder blades it is safe to ask "Can I see Uranus"?

  27. some people, yeesh... by Thud457 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    dumbkopf! F=mA is obviously a knuckle tattoo!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  28. Seriously? by thepropain · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This questions was actually Slashdot-worthy? Ya know, unlike a certain other board, Slashdot actually was good at some point in the past... But to answer the last question I'll ever answer here: tattoos are meant to be personal. If you have to ask someone else if/what you should get permanenly marked on your skin, you should probably not be considering getting a tattoo at all. Operating under the assumption that you'll go ahead with it, are there mathematical formulas and/or symbols that actually mean something to you on an emotional level? Those are what you should get. Seriously, though, don't take any answers from here. If you do, you'll be just like every other tattooed hipster douchebag trying to be socially ironic: permanently stamped with FAIL.

    --
    "You know you're narcissistic when you quote yourself in your sigs." -- PRoPAiN!
  29. Be unique... by Rooked_One · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Don't get any tattoos. I can only name 2 people that I know that don't have something...

    The older I get, the older that the "hip" crowd gets, and it just looks plain pathetic to be 30+ and have all these tattoos... Just think how bad the population is going to look 20 years from now - you'll have all these 40 yr olds that have way too much "ink" and you'll have none. I can't wait to be one of the very very few people who can say "I didn't get a tattoo because I wanted to be unique" at my 20 yr high school reunion.

    1. Re:Be unique... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2, Funny

      You're missing the point - tattoos make you unique. Without them, you're just another standard human, another carbon copy drone. After you customize your skin, nobody will ever have anything like it. Like a snowflake, really, no two alike. Your tats become a part of who you are. I'd be lying if I said they weren't addictive, though! Just make sure you live among people who accept your uniqueness instead of intolerant fools.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  30. Re:No. Tattoos look like trash. by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's a fad.

    Well, it's thousands of years old. At the moment, I would agree, it is a bit of a fad. But, again, in and of themselves, tattoos aren't the problem, it's bad choices on what to get, and where to get it. Admittedly, it's a lot more prevalent.

    It's really hard to take some seriously when there's shit sticking out of their eyebrows, ear lobe things that make one look like a yuppie Bush tribesmen, and a tongue piercing.

    I actually understand what you're saying, I just don't understand the bile -- it's not like it has anything to do with you. Yes, I see kids getting their neck done, or getting the big ear-lobe thing, and I worry that in a few years those are going to be career-limiters. Because, even as someone involved with tattoo culture, there's certain things I am aware of will give the average person the willies.

    People make snap judgments about others. Get over it. That's why you show up for an interview in a suit.

    When I show up in a suit, you don't see any ink. My eyebrow piercing is long gone, and nobody seems to even notice my earrings anymore. By choice, I don't have anything more extreme that is visible to anybody unless I want it to be.

    tattoos are about to look REAL dated

    Well, then 40% of Gen-X is about to look REAL dated. Probably a higher percentage of Gen-Next is well on their way to getting ink. And, shockingly, an increasing amount of boomers are getting inked.

    Hell, I know school teachers with tattoos. Typically discrete things that would never actually be shown at school.

    You're over-generalizing to all of the "in your face" (literally and figuratively) stuff that people get done, and extrapolating that everybody who has ever gotten a tattoo. Why you're venting this much spleen at the concept of tattoo is hard to guess.

    Seriously, it's not your damned lawn, grandpa. Get over it.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  31. alternative choice by hduff · · Score: 4, Funny

    Get tats of chicks with big boobs -- boobs can never, ever be proven wrong.

    --
    "I believe in Karma. That means I can do bad things to people all day long and I assume they deserve it." : Dogbert
  32. Re:No. Tattoos look like trash. by D+Ninja · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's why you show up for a date bathed and with your teeth brushed.

    Ohhhh...

  33. Black Hole entropy - (Hawking's tombstone) by thirty-seven · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here's what Stephen Hawking has said he wants on his tombstone: S = (pi.A.k.c^3)/(2.h.G) It's the formula for the entropy of a black hole, also the maximum amount of entropy possible in a volume of space. It's interesting and extremely insightful into the nature of the universe because all the values on the right-hand-side are constants except for A (the area). So it says that the amount of entropy in a black hole, and also the maximum amount of entropy possible, is directly proportional to the surface area! This is very counter-intuitive and is related to the holographic principle.

    --

    Atheism is a religion to the same extent that not collecting stamps is a hobby.

  34. The Question! by Per+Wigren · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You should tattoo pi * 1337%

    --
    My other account has a 3-digit UID.
  35. Re:No. Tattoos look like trash. by mdarksbane · · Score: 4, Funny

    Umm, no? He realizes that while he likes his tattoos not everyone shares his opinions?

    I think my cock is awesome but I don't show up for a job interview in crotchless chaps.

  36. No it isn't by Weaselmancer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The "no visible tattoo" policy is the antithesis of the 1st Amendment.

    Please people, read the first amendment and try to understand it.

    "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

    It starts - and pay attention - "Congress shall make no law".

    Do you see anywhere that Congress has made a law that says visible tattoos are bad?

    This is a corporate policy. If you are hired, they are welcoming you in the door onto their property - on their terms. If they say you have to wear purple underwear to work here, guess what? YOU DO.

    Employment is optional. Nobody has to give you a job. If they don't like your tattoos they don't have to hire you. It is really as simple as that. You have to do what the boss says - it's a job. It is not a right.

    So back OT, to the guy who wants a sleeve of math equations, my advice would be DON'T. It's fun, it's nerdy, I can see the appeal. But you are limiting your options.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
    1. Re:No it isn't by DamnStupidElf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I could probably sue an employer for sexual harassment if they tried to dictate the kind of underwear I wore. Similarly, are they going to turn away burn victims for jobs if their scars could be mistaken for a tattoo? Oh well, I'm sure technology will eventually provide the win with e-ink tattoos that you can just turn off when you're in the presence of idiots and morons.

    2. Re:No it isn't by labiator · · Score: 2, Informative

      As he pointed out, You don't HAVE to work there. If you don't like the policies of Company A, try to get on at Company B, Don't like those options? Give entrepreneurship a shot. My bet is YOU won't succeed because you figure everyone else is a tool. Me, call me a tool, but I will keep cashing those corporate paychecks as long as they come in.

      --
      Win if you can... Lose if you must... But always CHEAT!
    3. Re:No it isn't by Peach+Rings · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Nobody has to give you a job. If they don't like your 'x' they don't have to hire you.

      Note that the employer is breaking federal law if 'x' is:

      • race, color, religion, sex, age, ethnic group, or national origin
      • disability
      • genetic information
      • association with or marriage to someone (on the basis of race, religion, national origin, or disability)
      • previous discrimination lawsuits, or participating in discrimination investigations
      • participation in schools or places of worship associated with a particular racial, ethnic, or religious group

      States have innumerable laws such as can't make hiring, firing, compensation, layoff, transfer, training, benefits, retirement, or promotion decisions based on:

      • status as a parent
      • pregnancy
      • results of a lie detector test
      • marital status
      • sexual orientation
      • political affiliation

      So clearly employees do have recourse for discrimination. Your "a job is a privilege not a right" is about a hundred years late.

      Also, yes the first amendment only applies to congress (and state governments from the 14th amendment) but the question here isn't of law, it's of whether something is right or wrong. Freedom of speech is the defining principle of American culture and law, and its violation is rightfully greeted with disgust.

    4. Re:No it isn't by gwayne · · Score: 2, Funny

      Clearly, tattoos fall under the provision of color and potentially religion and/or ethnic groups (i.e. Maori).

    5. Re:No it isn't by Weaselmancer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      the question here isn't of law, it's of whether something is right or wrong.

      Ah, but it *is* a question of law. That was my whole point.

      OP said that the First Amendment somehow made it okay for him to have tattoos and get any job he wants. Which is absolutely silly if you've ever taken the time to read it. The First Amendment only prohibits Congress from making laws that abridge free speech.

      The morality of it is a different conversation, and one that has absolutely nothing to do with the First Amendment.

      --
      Weaselmancer
      rediculous.
    6. Re:No it isn't by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 3, Informative
      I agree. What's needed is a sort of planned economy, to give jobs to everyone. With the plan in hand, we could make just the right amount of goods, with no waste. We could get rid of advertising as it would no longer be needed. There could be no more than 3 or 4 times pay difference between ordinary American peasants and the Ivy League elite. This system would only work if we were all on the same page about it, so we'd need political education at a national level. We could have sort of town meetings every Tuesday night where Obama could brief us by video on last week's progress and tell us what we need to work on for the coming week. Everyone would register in a work unit so we could make sure nobody missed the meeting.

      Or you could just, you know, get another job. It's up to you. Where did this bizarre idea that someone else is responsible for your job come from? Has this idea ever been tried before, on a large scale? How did it work out?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    7. Re:No it isn't by nospam007 · · Score: 2, Funny

      "My company has a policy that states you may not have visible underwear."

      My company has a policy that states you may not have invisible underwear.

    8. Re:No it isn't by Weaselmancer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why not? Tattooed people aren't a "protected class". An employer could look you dead in the eye and say you look like a carny so we're not hiring you. They're allowed to have a dress code.

      I had to contract with a company that had a strict dress code. Slacks, white shirts, thin black ties mandatory. No facial hair past a mustache and a goatee. All legal.

      Of course being a contractor I could look how I wished. But it was really strange the first day. I showed up in a polo shirt, no tie, and a full beard. You'd have thought I had been out in the parking lot clubbing puppies. People would get whiplash when I'd walk by. They'd turn, glare - then notice the Visitor badge and relax. A little.

      --
      Weaselmancer
      rediculous.
    9. Re:No it isn't by Weaselmancer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yours is exactly the self-negating attitude I was referring to.

      Nonsense. I am merely pointing out that your argument that this goes against the first amendment of the Bill of Rights is bunk. Because it is. Read it and I'm sure you will agree.

      They're rights regardless of whether they are in the Constitution.

      Perhaps. Perhaps you're a big fan of the whole natural law thing. But I think you'll find that if you get fired for having a tattoo and walk into the local courthouse waving around a copy of the Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen, your case will not go well. At all.

      I was merely addressing your legal interpretation, that the first amendment protects you in this way. It does not. A literal reading simply means that Congress cannot pass a law taking away your right of free speech.

      So until Congress passes a dress code, your argument does not hold.

      --
      Weaselmancer
      rediculous.
  37. Re:Quite simply, by bitt3n · · Score: 3, Interesting

    he should get P=NP above the four knuckles of one hand, and the strike-through version on the other four knuckles

  38. Re:Lazer removal? by xystren · · Score: 2, Informative

    People have that attitude that tattoos are easy to remove with lasers. But one also needs to remember that tattoos themselves are a wound - depending on the talent of the artist, wounds tend to scar. The ink my get lightened (removal is a bit of a misnomer); the laser breaks up the pigment molecule which is then removed through the body's lymphatic system.

    Laser removal is also a long process, and generally is not a one time process either. Generally a person needs to go through a series of sessions, and depending on the color of the inks used, that are different wavelengths required for the requirements. Not all laser machines are created the same. Also hope that you don't have a lot of white (Titanium Dioxide) since that has a tendency to turn complete black when laser removal is done.

    The lasers themselves also have the danger of creating scaring. So even though you might not have the ink there, you still can often see the scaring that is left.

    Consider very carefully before getting a tattoo, and if you go into with the attitude that "Ohh, I can get it laser removed if I don't like it in the future" don't get one. There are so many factors that are very rarely considered.

    I speak from observed experience, research and from attending educational seminars. My girlfriend owns a tattoo studio and also runs (executive director) an international tattoo association. I've learned far more about tattooing and the body modification industry than I ever wanted to know.

    Laser is not the answer. Carefully consideration and placement are your best options.

  39. How to pick a tattoo by ari_j · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Here is my rule for tattoos: Select the exact design and location you want to have. If you still want that exact design and location in ten years, then get it. Otherwise, or if you change the tattoo or its location even in some minute point within those ten years, the clock starts over.

  40. Re:No. Tattoos look like trash. by Abcd1234 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I think my cock is awesome but I don't show up for a job interview in crotchless chaps.

    Best. Analogy. Ever.

  41. Really? by Weaselmancer · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is the most poignant question you've seen in a long time? Seriously?

    Ok, look. Here's some wiki for you.

    2,332,760 / 4,314,880 * 100% = 54%

    54% of the arable land in North America is not utilized. If you want to live on a farm go do it. Uncle Sam will even help. But if you're totally punk rock and don't want to "be part of the machine", then go be Amish. They manage it pretty well.

    The reason why nobody actually does this is because that way of life is stupefyingly difficult. Up before dawn to a full day of hard labor every single day.

    Go spend a week on a real farm. Just a single week. I'm sure they'd be glad for the help. I'll bet you don't last two days. I doubt I would.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
    1. Re:Really? by Peach+Rings · · Score: 2, Funny

      My father became fabulously rich not growing the most alfalfa of any farmer in the state.

    2. Re:Really? by flappinbooger · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Depends what two weeks of the year you are there. And what type of "farm" it is.

      From what I've seen, even if you do 10,000 acres of grain (be it corn, wheat, beans, etc) there are DEFINITELY times of the year when you don't do nuthin.

      Of Course, the planting season and the harvest season are pretty busy (24x7 if you can).

      But, if all you do is grain, there are some times when the most difficult thing you do is going to your favorite breakfast joint to drink coffee and tell tall tales.

      The hard kind of farming is when you deal with livestock. Those kinds of farms.... Yeah. It stinks. Literally and figuratively. Having livestock makes it hard to get away on vacation - ever, it's a dawn to dusk type of career. No, I'm not a farmer, but I live in farm country and I have a lot of friends who are farmers or grew up on farms. Most grain farmers have some sort of livestock though, from what I've seen. Until they want to slow down when they get old, then they sell off the livestock. Yes farming is hard, but it isn't torture, and it can be very profitable.

      --
      Flappinbooger isn't my real name
  42. Re:No. Tattoos look like trash. by Achra · · Score: 5, Insightful

    By the gods, I wish that I had modpoints today. Protip: Don't argue against tattoos to the tattoo'd. They are maniacally pro-ink (and they MUST be! They'll be inked for the rest of their lives!). As the saying goes: If you have no tattoos, don't get any tattoos. If you HAVE tattoos, get MORE tattoos. It used to be that tattoos and body modifications were mostly used as a mechanism to show membership in a particular group. Nowadays, it seems that people get ink to show that they are a member of the "people who have ink" group. Not sure what to make of that, tempted to think "fad", just as you stated. I'm sure I'll be flamed for this, just like you were. I was a US Marine (am, I suppose. Once/Always, etc.) and I saw more young marines getting inked than NOT getting inked. They wanted to show that they were part of a group, that they belonged. I managed to avoid getting inked back then, and I figure if I didn't get inked in the Marines, then I might as well skip it going forward. I'm not against a tasteful tattoo on a man, think tattoos on women are gross, and think that all of the "people who judge me based on my tattoos are wrong." crowd are naive. People judge me based on my face and appearance all day long. As a people, we look at a face and body and make a snap decision about that person. It is how we've evolved to survive. and to be honest, I know that the in-your-face tattoo crowd are making snap judgements about my face when they see it, too.

    --
    Each processor would proceed sequentially as if it had been better for them not to rise against Saul.
  43. I have a meaningful tattoo by justinlee37 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You don't think that some ideas or symbols are worth marking your body with?

    I have a tattoo of the symbol for infinity on the center of my back. Any T-shirt covers it up so 95% of the people I meet haven't seen it and don't even know I have ink. I got the tattoo after thinking of the idea and considering it for 1 or 2 years. My Dad took me to the artist who did all of his tattoos right after my high school graduation ceremony, and paid for it as a graduation present.

    I got the tattoo because the concept of infinity is closely related to immortality, timelessness, and endless life. It's ironic to tattoo a symbol for timelessness on a mortal body that will eventually wither, die, and rot. Therefore the tattoo is a personal reminder to live life to the fullest because it doesn't last forever.

    The tattoo is not a cheap joke. It's not a kitschy idea. I don't show it at parties to get a laugh out of people. It's a very personal reminder to be happy and enjoy life.

    You're right that it's very important to consider that tattoos last for the rest of your life (but not forever), and that they will eventually fade and possibly be warped by the wrinkling and sagging of skin. It's important to think about a tattoo for a long time before getting it to make sure that you want it, and it's also important not to get a tattoo of some political or scientific position you have that might change in the future. A tattoo of a flower is simple and timeless; flowers will always represent life, love, and beauty, and the tattoo could mark some important life event (such as my high school graduation). A tattoo that says "Bush Sucks" or "Jesus Saves" might not be a good idea because you might not always feel that way.

    So, in summary, some tattoos are indeed stupid, but the idea that getting a tattoo is inherently stupid is a stupid idea. I'm not worried about my tattoo fading or wrinkling because it's a tattoo about aging and death anyway; the whole point is that it won't be there forever. The next tattoo I'm going to get will simply read "no hope, no fear" and I've been sure that I want it for over a year.

  44. Re:No. Tattoos look like trash. by radtea · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Tattoos 50 years ago were about getting drunk while in the navy.

    And don't forget: the reason why you did that back then was to prove what a Real Tough Man(TM) you were.

    I'd love to see what those 70-year-old guys think now that half the teenage girls they see have more ink than they do. I knew a number of middle-aged guys thiry years ago who had got tattoos when they were twenty years younger, and they all felt kinda stupid about it then. By now they must feel unbelievably stupid, because they realize that what their younger selves considered a mark of manly toughness was no big deal, since virtually everyone has more than sufficient pain tolerance to get inked.

    Tattooing as a practice has been around forever, usually as a means of expressing some aspect of social status, mostly among men. So while tattooing is certainly not a fad, the current "express your unique identity via a tattoo" certainly is, just as the "express how manly and tough you are" was.

    Hopefully when this fad passes people will realize that tattooing is no big deal, one way or another. It can be useful for people struggling to express their identity, but it says mostly, "This person went through a time in their life when they were sufficiently uncertain of who they were that they felt the need to spend money and time and a trivial amount of pain on ensuring some aspect of who they thought they were at the moment would be emblazoned on their skin."

    People who are secure in their identity don't need to do that. For some people who aren't secure in their identity it can genuinely help. For most, it's treating the symptom, not the cause, and that's rarely a good idea.

    --
    Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
  45. Mandelbrot by mattholimeau · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I haven't read all the replies, but I'm surprised that so far I haven't heard any mention of the amazing mandelbrot set. That could make for an interesting background at the least. If I were to do it, it would likely be some mosaic of all the most interesting math I could find, with probably some overlay of mandelbrot and the golden number (like, many many of the digits closely-packed) as the background. It would certainly take some time (yes, for me, probably years) to figure out what the foreground would be. Very interesting and introspective-inducing post. Shame on all those who preach "no tattoo" to someone clearly interested in a tattoo.