Slashdot Mirror


Dell Selling Faulty PCs

An anonymous reader writes "PC maker Dell has been accused of selling thousands of desktop PCs despite knowing the machines contained faulty components, according to recently unsealed court documents first reported about on Tuesday by The New York Times."

17 of 484 comments (clear)

  1. obQuote by girlintraining · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "A new car built by my company leaves somewhere traveling at 60 mph. The rear differential locks up. The car crashes and burns with everyone trapped inside. Now, should we initiate a recall? Take the number of vehicles in the field, A, multiply by the probable rate of failure, B, multiply by the average out-of-court settlement, C. A times B times C equals X. If X is less than the cost of a recall, we don't do one." -- Fight Club.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
  2. Re:Yep by TrisexualPuppy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Also, as a follow-up, at my company where we were running a few dozen GX270s which we purchased in the 2003-2004 timeframe, we had similar problems. Machines dying which ended up being faulty capacitors, of course not manufactured by Dell. (I had the same problem on an Abit motherboard from the same time period.)

    Call up Dell tech support, tell them what's going on, and bam! Motherboard either overnighted, or a tech sent out within two days to replace the board at no cost. They knew what was going on, and it never took more than five or ten minutes to get things rolling. I'm not a Dell fanboi by any means, but every company is going to have supply problems.

  3. Different measures by OpenSourced · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well, after so many years seeing software makers get away with it, I can understand them trying it out.

    --
    Rome taught me patience and assiduous application to detail. Virtues which temper the boldness of great, general views.
  4. Re:Yep by Rockoon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You think you would get a tech to come out if you have only ever purchased 1 machine from them?

    Yeah, its easy to get serviced when you are an important customer that does regular business.

    --
    "His name was James Damore."
  5. Re:Yep by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I bought three last week, and their customer service already knew what was going on. A tech already came out next-day to replace the faulty components. No questions asked. Next?

    From the article,

    According to company memorandums and other documents recently unsealed in a civil case against Dell in Federal District Court in North Carolina, Dell appears to have suffered from the bad capacitors, made by a company called Nichicon, far more than its rivals. Internal documents show that Dell shipped at least 11.8 million computers from May 2003 to July 2005 that were at risk of failing because of the faulty components. These were Dell’s OptiPlex desktop computers — the company’s mainstream products sold to business and government customers.

    So last week you bought three computers dated between May 2003 and July 2005? The suit names Optiplexes with bad capacitors and that's what you purchased last week? Or are you telling me that this continues to this day in 2010, seven years after it started?

    You may have other problems than faulty computers -- like a faulty lie generator or even employment at Dell.

    --
    My work here is dung.
  6. The entire discussion, in one post: by localman57 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've had seven dells, and they've all been perfect!

    I've had two dells, and both died early! I'll never buy dell again

    FIRST POST!

    People know Dell squeezes component suppliers. What do they expect?

    Of course it had defective components! What do you call Windows?

    This is why I buy Macs

    So what? Are you saying Macs don't use capacitors?

    Dude! You're...Insert Whitty variation here...

    now move along. Nothing else to see here...

  7. Dell SOLD Fauly PCs by Dan+East · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The article states the PCs were sold between 2003 and 2005, and they suffered from a rash of bad capacitors produced in Asia. The bad capacitors affected other computer manufacturers as well, but seemed to affect Dell worse.

    This information is nothing new, and essentially it sounds like the problem was so bad, and infiltrated the industry to such a depth, that even replacement machines would likely fail from bad capacitors as well.

    The tiny summary specifically makes it sound like Dell is selling machines with these problems now, which is totally misleading.

    --
    Better known as 318230.
  8. I KNEW there was a Lawsuit. by WarlockD · · Score: 5, Informative

    I cannot tell you how many times I have replaced the boards off an OptiPlex 270 and then the 280. It was just freaking insane. Dell's response was just horrid as well.

    I mean, the sales people could blab all they want, but one look at the board and it was evident from a layperson that something was wrong. The best we could do as contractors is to just state its an "industry wide problem" (true) and that Dell will fix any system affected (partially true). I might like Dell, but I am not getting lynched by an irate manager because their sales team can't tell a straight lie.

    I mean hell, there was not a DAY that went by that I didn't have 2 of those boards to be replaced. Not a week went by when the board sent that was "refurbished" didn't have the same issue. Toward the end, we started having motherboard swapping contests and I could do a 270 in under 5 min, if it was in front of me.

    I do like what one client did. He apparently worked on the old XT systems and once he found out about the problem, he just replaced the affected caps himself

  9. Re:Yep by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 5, Informative

    So... considering that bad boards were used to replace bad boards, how many of those GX270s are still around? I too worked at a company that bought that model. When I left there were more GX260s and GX240s, even GX150s in circulation that GX270s, and it was dept. policy not to ship GX270s to any of our satellite offices because they were too likely to fail. What does a service contract matter if they're just going to dump in more bad hardware? RTFA.

    --
    I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
  10. GM does/did it. by dlt074 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    GM released certain models where the stepper motors for the odometers where bunk. they quickly came in for repair and were fixed no questions asked... the only problem was that they were fixed with the same defective part because GM couldn't get good motors built fast enough. the thought was to fix them make the customer happy and then fix them again with good parts when they broke again.

    the customer was happy i guess, up until the second or third visit.

    lots of that kind of thing with the radios too.

    i shudder to think how bad it's gonna be under the new management.

  11. Re:Mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    It should be noted that the article indicates Dell went to great lengths to avoid telling customers about the problem.

  12. Re:Yep by localman57 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah. Funny how all the service people are so eager to come to your girlfriend's house and solve her problems. Dude. Get a clue. Half the pornos in the world start out that way.

  13. Re:Yep by MrFreezeBU · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Yes, we had the very same situation in my previous company....At the beginning of this fiasco... As their supplies of motherboards dried up, their willingness to overnight the need parts disappeared. Fast forward another two months, and we were looking at 1 out of 4 GX270s out of service, and Dell unwilling and unable to honor their warrant support (Silver in this case). It took papers from company council to get Dell to agree to a PFR (Proactive Field Replacement) on most GX270s in inventory (~100). During this process, we were told that only certain production runs, which were identifiable by asset tag) were faulty. 3 months later, they were back to replace those also.

    In the end, we certified our internal helpdesk technicians as Dell authorized warranty support. By doing this we were at least able to recoup some of the costs, as it does not take much extra time to swap out the motherboard when you are already inside looking for failed caps.

    Shortly thereafter, our account reps were calling, asking why their sales volume had dropped off....

    Just one of many Dell related storied I can tell.... The one with them moving Gold support to India with no warning was another fun one..

  14. Re:Yep by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's not an 'assumption' at all, if you had read the article, you'd know it was a confirmed practice, exposed during the legal proceedings described therein. Congratulations on being able to pressure Dell into doing what they should have for everybody, but don't be an asshole implying people are ignorant just because their experience differs slightly from yours. Anecdotal evidence only goes so far.

    --
    I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
  15. Macs Don't Use Capacitors by Greyfox · · Score: 5, Funny

    Macs work by moving good karma around. If you ever open up one of their machines, there's not actually anything in there! This is not advisable though as opening them causes the karma to run out and they never work correctly again once you do this.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  16. Revoke the corporate charter by spun · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How exactly do you send a corporation to maximum security prison?

    You don't, you give it the death penalty. Carve it up and sell the parts to the highest bidder. Confiscate all bonuses from the corporate officers involved in the decision, use the proceeds from the sale and bonuses to pay off any 401(k) retirement plans invested in the company. Let the other shareholders eat the loss as a warning to perform better due diligence and not invest in criminal organizations. After all, if you invested in the mob and they got busted, you wouldn't get your money back, right? Organized crime is organized crime, it doesn't matter if the leader of one organization graduated from Yale and the other graduated from jail. If a corporation engages in criminal behavior, kill it with extreme prejudice and make all responsible suffer. If investors get burned a few times, they will make it a point to only invest in socially responsible, ethical companies.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    1. Re:Revoke the corporate charter by WarlockD · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I fully agree.

      If the US wants to view corporation as a living entity, they should have corporal punishment.

      Baring that, I think fines should be levied agents a corporation in percentages instead of flat numbers. Fining BP 75 million is nothing. Fining them 20% of gross profit each year till the spill clears up? It will be done in a week.