Slashdot Mirror


Tesla IPO Raises $226 Million

An anonymous reader writes "Tesla, which will trade under TSLA on Nasdaq, has been priced at $17 per share, allowing the electric car start-up to raise more than $226 million in its IPO. Investors were expecting the share price target range to be between $14 and $16 but the overflow of excitement saw Tesla increase the number of shares it plans to offer to 13.3 million, nearly 20 percent more than originally planned." Reader hlovy contributes a link from Xconomy.com summarizing the skepticism among some analysts as to how much staying power TSLA will demonstrate.

21 of 274 comments (clear)

  1. Curious Guests at the IPO Celebration by eldavojohn · · Score: 3, Funny

    Today Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla Motors, was seen shaking the robotic arm of a submersible BP robot at the IPO celebration ...

    --
    My work here is dung.
  2. That's a reversal by Mad-Bassist · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I distinctly remember them saying a few years ago they didn't want to go public with the company so they'd retain complete control.

    Maybe this is a good thing to grow the company, but will being beholden to the stockholders be a problem down the road?

    --
    "The only legitimate use of a computer is to play games." - Eugene Jarvis
  3. Re:Stock price already increased by SLot · · Score: 3, Funny

    Clearly, many people don't remember pets.com

  4. IPO: It's Probably Overpriced, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
    With the IPO at $17, and with it now trading at $20.50, some 20% higher than the already-raised IPO price, it really is probably overpriced.

    What makes TSLA an interesting business proposition (although not, for me, at $20+) is that if (and it's a huge "if") they can get production up and running in a timely fashion, they really do stand to reform the auto industry.

    The old model - manufacturers sell to dealers, and dealers sell to end users, but the dealers are franchisees who actually have no real relationship with the manufacturer. Your GM dealer sucks? Your GM dealer's mechanic sucks? It all reflects poorly on GM, and what's worse (from GM's point of view) is that all the short-term gains made by shady dealers and overpriced service departments go to the dealer, not to GM. Dealerships are profit centers for the dealer, but often breakeven or even loss centers for the manufacturer.

    Tesla's model is new to the auto industry: manufacturer sells direct to consumer, and also owns the distribution network and the service departments. That's nothing new in high tech: Apple's made a fortune using that model. The "Apple Store" gives a retail presence, but the guy at the Apple Store doesn't really care whether you buy the thing on the spot or go back home and buy it through the website.

    Applying that model to cars is interesting - and potentially groundbreaking. In the case of the Big Three, the dealer networks were an albatross around the neck of the auto manufacturers. If Tesla's model works, Telsa won't need a network of thousands of independent dealerships, because the only function of the dealerships will be to provide test drives and occasional servicing. Dealerships will be profit centers, not loss centers, for the manufacturer.

    1. Re:IPO: It's Probably Overpriced, but... by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 4, Insightful
      The Model S doesn't compete against a Yaris. It competes against the BMW 5 series and the Mercedes E class. You're not the target market.

      Disclaimer: I own a Roadster, have a $5k down payment on a Model S, and bought a couple thousand shares of TSLA this morning.

    2. Re:IPO: It's Probably Overpriced, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Guys, I can buy a base-model Chevy Aveo for $9,000 new, or I can buy a Ferrari F458 for $200,000. I don't understand how Ferrari can compete.

    3. Re:IPO: It's Probably Overpriced, but... by FooAtWFU · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Tesla's innovative organizational structure won't be enough to save them if their cars are a flop, though - and sure, the Roadster is a cool car and could be construed as being ahead of the competition so far, but it's also expensive, the batteries suffer from massive depreciation, and the economy's not looking spectacularly hot right now. Moreover the regular automakers aren't really that far behind (a plug-in hybrid Prius would be a perfectly reasonable substitute for the normal-consumer-oriented version of the Tesla technology).

      There's a lot of optimism priced into the stock right now. I wouldn't expect them to go out of business in the next couple of years or anything, and I might pick up a few shares if it gets down to $10-$12 or so, but a $22/share price sounds way too optimistic for my liking. I'd wait for the headline-buzz to fade a little before pouring too much money into it.

      Telsa is not GOOG. Automobiles are a capital-intensive business.

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    4. Re:IPO: It's Probably Overpriced, but... by westlake · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Tesla's model is new to the auto industry: manufacturer sells direct to consumer, and also owns the distribution network and the service departments. That's nothing new in high tech: Apple's made a fortune using that model.

      One difference is that Apple's exposure in a recall is limited to the replacement cost of a small household appliance.

      It doesn't have to "service" anything.

      Tesla has a $100K Roadster and a $65K Model S sedan in the works.

      That implies a full-scale luxury dealer showroom and auto repair garage. Not a niche in the Galleria Mall.

    5. Re:IPO: It's Probably Overpriced, but... by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Because, clearly, I have nothing better to do than show off on Slashdot. I put money down on the Model S because I like the car, I bought stock in Tesla because I believe in the company. That's not flashy, that's just putting your money where your mouth is. The disclaimer was simply to point out my bias.

    6. Re:IPO: It's Probably Overpriced, but... by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      After I saw your post I decided to check the stock price (thanks!). 2120 shares bought at $18.43 and the stock is already at $23.89. Not a bad day.

  5. pessimism about EV cars or Tesla as a company? by sshir · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think Warren Buffett said that as a rule companies which pioneered most revolutionary technologies, those which changed our lives in profound ways, didn't make money for original investors... Especially in transportation (think airlines, car companies etc.)

  6. Good for them by Chris+Burke · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have to admit though I'm a little disappointed they didn't get the stock ticker COIL.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  7. Re:Stock price already increased by savanik · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No revenue stream now; no revenue stream until 2012.

    This seems to be pretty much parallel to most of the business plans of dot-coms. "We have cool new technology! What, we also need sales?"

    It really depends on how well they can market the roadsters... which they have not shown to be one of their strong suits yet. Time will tell. Opening day will not.

  8. Re:Stock price already increased by Tekfactory · · Score: 4, Informative

    Nope, they stopped making the Roadsters, all work now is on the S-Sedan and licensing their Drivetrain technology to Mercedes and Toyota.

  9. Re:Only One Thing I Dislike About Tesla Motors... by Thelasko · · Score: 4, Informative

    Their cars run on DC motors (or at least get power from a DC source). Yet the company is named after a man who is acknowledged as the father of the alternating current (at least in the US).

    Only the batteries are DC. The motor is AC and driven by an inverter in the car's Power Electronics Module.

    --
    One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
  10. Re:Hippy alert! by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 3, Funny

    Here's my ride. Look for it passing you on the highway.

    Most people don't try to go out of their way to show off to the world that they have a tiny penis.

  11. Re:Only One Thing I Dislike About Tesla Motors... by nido · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Only One Thing I Dislike About Tesla Motors... Their cars run on DC motors (or at least get power from a DC source). Yet the company is named after a man who is acknowledged as the father of the alternating current (at least in the US).

    /methinks Tesla himself would be disappointed that "Tesla" Motor's cars require batteries, when his Black Magic Touring Car ran on free energy delivered through a "dozen vacuum tubes -- 70-L-7 type -- and other electrical parts".

    Around the turn of the century Tesla concluded that it would be possible to transmit electrical power without wires. To optimise results, he chose to experiment at high altitude, where the air was thinner and therefore more conductive. As a result he ended up building a research laboratory in Colorado Springs where he conducted some of his most extraordinary experiments; tests that even to this day are shrouded in mystery. Tesla theorised that unlimited amounts of power could be transmitted anywhere on earth, without wires and with virtually no loss of energy. It is not clear exactly how he intended to do this, but right up until the end of his life he maintained that it was quite possible and that he only needed sufficient funds to make it a reality.

    The funds however were not forthcoming, and Tesla was eventually forced to abandon his Colorado experiments in what was to become a recurrent feature in his life; no money or insufficient finance to pursue an idea . . . but a constant stream of new ideas.

    -Nikola Tesla: Maverick, Visionary and Master of Light

    --
    Learn the rules so you know how to break them properly.
    www.teslabox.com
  12. Re:Only One Thing I Dislike About Tesla Motors... by OzPeter · · Score: 4, Funny

    Only the batteries are DC.

    Well its been a while since I have seen any AC batteries, so I guess that's why they went with the DC ones.

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  13. Re:Stock price already increased by qortra · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why would anyone want just another run of the mill "family car".

    Obviously, there's a huge government conspiracy to make us think that people want "family cars". Heck, Wikipedia is claiming that a compact family sedan called the "Corolla" is the best selling car of all time.

    If it's got > 2 functional seats, I ain't interested.

    Sucker - I'm not interested unless it only has one functional seat and zero doors.

  14. Re:Stock price already increased by phantomfive · · Score: 3, Funny

    If it's got > 2 functional seats, I ain't interested.

    Hard to set up a threesome if you only have one extra seat. I see what your priorities are.

    --
    Qxe4
  15. Re:fail by MozeeToby · · Score: 4, Informative

    That particular episode of Top Gear is (especially) derided as FUD. The car never ran out of batteries, they never recharged the car (just an off the cuff remark about it taking 16 hours to charge from their windmill(!?)), and the 'brake down' that they reported was a blown fuse (not a drive train one either, just a regular one like could and does happen in every car). The put the car into neutral and pushed it off the track to 'show what would happen if you ran out of charge', obviously you could say the exact same thing about running out of gas on the track.

    To me, that really brought to light just how much the people at Top Gear are biased towards the cars that they like and against the cars that they don't.