Slashdot Mirror


Sidestepping A-to-D Convertors For Town Government's Cable TV?

jake-itguy writes "I am the IT guy for a small town municipality. Comcast called me the other day and told me I had to have a digital-to-analog converter for each TV in the municipality, as Comcast is turning off analog cable in September. I did a quick count, and we have 32 TVs across 6 buildings (22 being in the police and fire departments). Most of the TVs are hung on the walls. I told Comcast having a box for each TV was not acceptable and wanted a different solution. Comcast told me there was no other solution." Read on for more details of the situation, and to see if you can offer Jake any advice for distributing cable service within his Indiana town. jake-itguy continues: "They told me they have been putting these boxes on every TV in each classroom in each school. I laughed when I heard that. I said, 'Do you know how much electricity is going to be needed for each box?' They didn't know the answer. I was bumped up to the next guy in the Comcast hierarchy, who said there was no other solution and I had to pay $3 per month for each box. Being a municipality, we are entitled to free expanded basic cable as a part of the franchise agreement back in 1982.

I know there is a solution, as hospitals and hotels don't have little boxes next their TVs. Unfortunately I haven't found a specific answer to this problem so I am asking Slashdot. Is there a box that can be put in the basement of the town hall that will convert the Comcast signal into a regular digital signal? Most of the TVs in the town have digital tuners per last years a2d conversion of the airwaves. I would be willing to replace the few analog sets with new ones if there is a good solution for this. Each building's cable feed is fed from the town hall. We have a nice big 1-inch cable coming into the building with some splitters coming off the line. Each building gets a 1/2 inch cable. Is there a box that will convert the Comcast signal to analog for the schools? I am sure the schools don't have TVs with digital tuners."

76 of 539 comments (clear)

  1. Are they all tuned to the same channel? by Locke2005 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you don't mind them all being tuned to the same channel, you only need 1 converter box per building. Might also need an RF amplifier to help with distribution since by definition splitting the signal attenuates it.

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    1. Re:Are they all tuned to the same channel? by ooji · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or if you use a modulators as well you can then have one box per channel per building and have multiple channels.

    2. Re:Are they all tuned to the same channel? by FictionPimp · · Score: 5, Informative

      This is how we offer TV service to our dorms.

      We have 1 box per 2 channels of directTV (or dishnetwork I can't recall which). Each one pushes out to a tv channel that their TV can tune in to watch.

      We offer 30 channels so we have 15 boxes.

    3. Re:Are they all tuned to the same channel? by tweek · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "For some people that's half a week's take home pay."

      If someone is only making $170 a week in take home pay, maybe they should stop paying for fucking cable. There are bigger priorities at that point.

      --
      "Fighting the underpants gnomes since 1998!" "Bruce Schneier knows the state of schroedinger's cat"
    4. Re:Are they all tuned to the same channel? by vtcodger · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you just need to tune to a local news channel for weather alerts and to a few public service channels, Channel Plus makes a nice looking (on paper anyway) four channel modulator for about $150.

      In any case, it doesn't sound to me like Comcast is acting in good faith (like any sane person would expect them to). Probably your best bet is to get your data together. Write up the information in a form that will make sense to an intelligent adult. No easy job. Some of the posts in this thread will give you an idea of the amount of stupidity you will encounter. Estimate current and ongoing costs to maintain your current level of service.

      Armed with your whitepaper, your boss or your boss'es boss should sit down with the town attorney and decide whether to escalate to the state government and/or the Public Utility Commission. Assuming that the franchise agreement supports it, I'd have the suits argue to higher authority that Comcast is obligated to deliver you expanded basic service in analog (or replace your TVs) and how they do it should not be your problem. Comcast should be responsible for the engineering, installation, and maintenance of their solution whatever it is. Who knows, Comcast being possibly the second most despised company (after BP) in many parts of America. The PUC or whoever may see things your way.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    5. Re:Are they all tuned to the same channel? by commodore64_love · · Score: 2, Informative

      >>>that the TV's QAM receiver is incapable of uncompressing it?

      QAM is perfectly capable of receiving the signal and uncompressing it, just the same way my ATSC receiver receives channel 35 and uncompresses it into Mind, Global, Link, and the Extra channels. It's part of the standard. In fact there still are a few unscrambled QAM signals that people watch. It's only the scrambled ones that require the box.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    6. Re:Are they all tuned to the same channel? by sumdumass · · Score: 2, Insightful

      P.S. Have you tried reading a book instead? Supernatural and CSI are not necessities of life.

      I guess you have a point, however it totally ignores his point. He could read a book instead of enjoying his life the way he is used to enjoying it, but that all misses the fact that he has to change what he is doing because of someone else' greed.

      And while I'm not one to generally bash corporations or businesses because they make money, when some corporations have legal monopolies and make changes like this because of their greed with the knowledge that their franchise agreement has given them the power to piss consumers off without retribution, then it becomes a notable problem. Whether they are scrambling it to force him to pay or if they are compressing it to get more out of their existing system which has the same effect is inconsequential at this point. Both boil down to unanswered greed that abuses the position they are in that was a direct result of pretending to benefit the public trust.

      I can put it in a useless analogy if you want. I can even work cars into it if you want. The bottom line is that he has to change his way because of greed from a company that receives special treatment because they are supposed to be providing a certain service to the community that this move seems to undermine.

    7. Re:Are they all tuned to the same channel? by WrongMonkey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You always have another choice: quit watching TV.

    8. Re:Are they all tuned to the same channel? by Cramer · · Score: 2, Informative

      The word people are omitting is "encryption". Most MSOs will encrypt everything they legally can. This means the only thing you can see without a cable box or cablecard are broadcast channels. And the FCC have been pussing out and granting wavers to encrypt those too.

    9. Re:Are they all tuned to the same channel? by dubner · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > ... Comcast really, really sucks when it comes to screwing-over the customer ...

      Comcast is really, really good when it comes to screwing-over the customer ...

      There, fixed it for you.

      Maybe you're the one that wrote this backwards marketing copy

    10. Re:Are they all tuned to the same channel? by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 2, Informative

      That will effectively force people to upgrade to Comcast TV or Comcast Internet" in order to get decent television.

      It can't force anyone to do anything. Watching TV is not a necessity of life and thus there is nothing forcing you to continue buying it other than one's own choice to do so.

    11. Re:Are they all tuned to the same channel? by Obfuscant · · Score: 2, Informative
      Have you considered that they are not "scrambling" the digital signal, but rather compressing it to save bandwidth, and that the TV's QAM receiver is incapable of uncompressing it?

      No, madam, the basic digital signals are encrypted nowadays. It's not compression, not intended to compress anything.

    12. Re:Are they all tuned to the same channel? by mrchaotica · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nobody has a CableCard-capable TV. They were vaporware a few years ago, and now they're superceded by Tru2Way, which is also vaporware. Cable Labs (run by -- guess who -- Comcast, among other cable companies) gives lip service to developing these things, but really tries to avoid it as much as possible because the assholes in charge would rather everyone have to rent boxes.

      Besides, even cable cards, which still entail a per-TV rental fee, are asinine compared to simply shutting off the fucking encryption and letting everybody use the perfectly good QAM tuners they already have!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    13. Re:Are they all tuned to the same channel? by tweek · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I read the whole post and everything after the hard numbers was irrelevant. The point was that if someone is living on that meager of an income, television service of ANY kind is the last thing they need to worry about.

      Cable television isn't going to increase your earning potential unless you happen to fancy yourself the next Cake Boss.

      For the record, I don't have cable. I use an OTA antennae to get the few shows we watch with the kids - mostly PBS. The rest we get from Netflix either streaming on the xbox or shipped.

      --
      "Fighting the underpants gnomes since 1998!" "Bruce Schneier knows the state of schroedinger's cat"
    14. Re:Are they all tuned to the same channel? by Marillion · · Score: 2, Interesting

      All of this misses the point. The city has a contract with the cable company for FREE cable. I presume that there are televisions in break rooms at firehouses and other locations. The police dispatcher might have the weather channel on. In 1982, it was cheap and easy for Comcast to provide. Now that it's 2010, Comcast wants to discontinue analogue and decommission all the equipment needed to support it. It will save them a bundle. Now, Comcast made a deal. Sorry Comcast, you have to honour it. I think Comcast should be allowed some latitude how to fulfill their obligations. Start with free converter boxes

      --
      This is a boring sig
  2. Why do you need cable? by SpudB0y · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Get antennas and cheap converter boxes. Or get a Channel Plus 3025 and only buy one cable box per building and pay $3 a month per box forever.

    1. Re:Why do you need cable? by Chyeld · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Stupid, off topic question, but is there any place you know of online to read up on things like the Channel Plus? I've been dreaming for a long time of setting up an 'in-home' network where I've got my OTA channels as well as a few 'computer run' channels setup to pass through preexisting coax I have in my home. But have so little knowledge about the topic that I haven't been able to even craft a relevant Google query to start off from.

    2. Re:Why do you need cable? by commodore64_love · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Its range is only 20-25 miles. The CM4228HD has a range of 50-60 miles which is why I would go with that.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
  3. Place them "elsewhere" by bradgoodman · · Score: 4, Insightful
    You could always just place the A-to-D box "upstream" of the TV set - several feet away - in a closet - wherever. It doesn't have to be right on the wall. Use the same Coaxial cable and splice the box in elsewhere. (I am assuming you don't have to change the channels often on these boxes.)

    If several TVs are tuned into the same channel in a building, you could use one box at the point-of-ingest into the building.

    1. Re:Place them "elsewhere" by Chaos+Incarnate · · Score: 3, Informative

      100W per box is way high; the model Comcast gave me (the Motorola DTA100) uses 5.37 watts while on, per the manufacturer. Not nothing, but over an order of magnitude better than you're claiming.

      --
      Benford's Corollary to Clarke's Law: "Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced."
    2. Re:Place them "elsewhere" by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 2, Informative

      100W per box is way high; the model Comcast gave me (the Motorola DTA100) uses 5.37 watts while on, per the manufacturer. Not nothing, but over an order of magnitude better than you're claiming.

      My cable box, what looks like a Motorola DCT3416 (don't have the unit in front of me) uses about 40W of power whether the unit is on or not. Neither Motorola nor the cable company care about the fact that it adds $4 per month to the power bill. Nor do they care that the UI is an utter disaster. For example, to turn on or off Closed captioning, you have to turn off the unit, press menu, and access it in the service menu. You can't just use the TV's CC decoder because it's garbled on digital channels from the box.

  4. Hotels by Tisha_AH · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hotels frequently have a bank of converters, each tuned to a different digital channel. The outputs of all of the converter boxes are put onto separate analog channels, multiplexed and fed through a distribution amplifier.

    You would need a box for each channel you wish to receive. While this may work with a hotel where they own all of the premise wiring to the rooms it would be impractical for a widespread system across a city.

    --
    Tisha Hayes
    1. Re:Hotels by master0ne · · Score: 3, Informative

      It sounds like the issue here is that the company is cutting off analog signal on the lines, so long as the tv's have digital tuners built in (or if you can purchase them separately) you should not need to rent Comcast's box @ $3/mo. As for the power requirements, deal with it, or buy new TV's with digital tuners built in. TV's already consume tons of power, a converter box is next to nothing compared to the display itself.


      On a side note: Im not sure about commercial settings, but in residential settings, anything affixed to your house, you own. the only thing the utilities own is the wire in the air/under ground running to your house. They like to pretend they own the wire on the house at times, but if its fixed to the home, its YOURS. I have been in the cable and satellite business for 2+ years as an installer. On another note, although not commonly used the size of the cable is sufficient description when referring to Coax line, although soft line cable (RG 58, RG 59, RG 6, RG 11) is better refereed to by the name (ie RG x) where as hard line can be refereed to by many different terms.

      --
      Noone writes jokes in base 13!
    2. Re:Hotels by quetwo · · Score: 2, Informative

      That is incorrect. Comcast encrypts virtually all channels, so a standard ClearQAM tuner that is available on the television set will not work. Comcast will require an external box for all their channels (they may not today for OTA channels, but they will as of 2012 when they are legally allowed to encrypt EVERYTHING).

    3. Re:Hotels by commodore64_love · · Score: 2, Informative

      >>>If all you had to do was buy TVs with built-in digital tuners -- you'd be fine. But because Comcast ENCRYPTS THEIR CABLE TV CHANNELS... you can't.

      Comcast sucks

      Comsucks.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
  5. A little box that doesn't use electricity... by human-cyborg · · Score: 4, Funny

    and provides an alternative to Comcast digital cable?

    Hmm, sounds like a book to me.

  6. Re-distribute necessary channels yourself? by one2wonder · · Score: 2, Informative

    Why couldn't you get a few tuners for the channels you want to distribute - and then modulate them on analog/digital channels and run your own signal? I'm pretty sure this is what hotels/hospitals do.

    --
    Never cease to wonder. If you do you have become compliant with the world around you, and that is a very dangerous thing
  7. Maybe the Digi TV's are already compatible? by stevew · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Couple of points - a "regular" signal is defined as digital! The other is that I would imagine that if you are only watching "basic" cable, then your digital tuners should cover the same frequencies. So there likely isn't any conversion for the digital TVs you already have.

    As for the Dig to Ana converters - remember the ads the cable TV folks ran - "You won't have to change a thing if you have cable because we'll keep the analog signal around." Well - Comcast lied! I have to rent 6 (*^#(#^^ boxes for my house!

    --
    Have you compiled your kernel today??
  8. franchise agreement by jemtallon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You may want to check the exact wording of the franchise agreement. Depending on how it's worded, if they are required to provide you free access to basic cable and they no longer offer that option, you may have some leverage with them. If nothing else, you may persuade them to give you the hardware at no cost.

    1. Re:franchise agreement by jedidiah · · Score: 2, Informative

      It looks like Comcast is trying to make the tradition "boxless cable option" disappear.

      I say: the city should push back on this. If nothing else, there should be a boxless cable
      option for any TV that can tune into digital signals with a built in tuner. A special cable
      box should simply not be required.

      There should be some cable package that can be used without a box.

      Basic cable from Comcast should be tunable with an HDHR or a naked HDTV.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    2. Re:franchise agreement by dnahelicase · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Better yet, find the franchise agreement and see if they have voided it. If they have, don't fight back. Start your own municipally-owned fiber-to-the-home cable/internet provider.

  9. Get satellite by countSudoku() · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I witnessed, many many years ago, a satellite setup for an apartment complex that used a Big Ugly Dish that muxed into a matrix of little individual tuner devices, the signals were recombined and then fed into the local F-type cable netwok, with repeater/amps behind that most likely. I wish I could tell you the brand names of these devices but I just don't remember. Let it be said; Comcrap is not the way to go, you could do much better with Dish/DirecTV (or anyone else's) service, I would suspect, and those companies would be much more helpful than your current "provider." Don't let your F-type cable go to waste, ditch Comcast and mux in the channels to your cable network from another vendor.

    --
    This is the NSA, we're gonna geet U h@x0r5! Also, what is a h@x0r5?
  10. Outlaw digital encryption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Get all of the police and firemen to go to the city council and demand they end the Comcast monopoly and while they are at it, have the city council ban encryption of the digital signal.

    Without a doubt, Comcast will find a solution for you!!!

    1. Re:Outlaw digital encryption by djupedal · · Score: 4, Funny

      I say put the Comcast guy in jail....the entire place will have cable by sundown just for his benefit while incarcerated. Don't let him out, or the service will go away too.

    2. Re:Outlaw digital encryption by sjames · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nice office youse have here. It'd be a real shame if something happened and all the police and firemen were too busy trying to get a signal on their TV to do anything about it...

      More seriously, yes, it sounds like this at the least violates the spirit of the franchise agreement (and perhaps the letter as well). Might be time to reconsider.

  11. Pretend you're a small cable company. by falzer · · Score: 3, Informative

    Get a converter for every digital channel you care about and retransmit on analog channels. Don't interfere with other channels. You can do this per-building or for the whole town if it's small enough.

    Actually, don't, since that would cost too much for the little benefit you would gain.

    Put just a few converters in each building and have a remote switch to pick your digital channel and analog channel.

  12. This is the box you're looking for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://www.vecima.com/products.php?line=1026&item=1083

    It does the digital to analog conversion in one spot, and is used to handle doing so for large buildings such as hospitals or apartment blocks.

    1. Re:This is the box you're looking for by KnightElite · · Score: 5, Informative

      Logged in as non-AC and updated with an actual clickable link:
      http://www.vecima.com/products.php?line=1026&item=1083

      Disclaimer: I work for Vecima networks, but this system does do exactly what you want, and is already being used in that capacity in many other places, including some hotels.

    2. Re:This is the box you're looking for by KnightElite · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm not sure, you would have the contact the company for more information (not my department to sell things ;) ). I would guess it's closer to the $5K-$10k range though.

  13. IPTV over Multicast by mbone · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What you want is IPTV over multicast. A number of universities have done this - one is the University of Wisconsin at Madison, which has a pretty bare bones approach using IP multicast and Apple Quicktime. They are also pretty good about giving technical clue if you run into trouble and ask nicely. If you want to spend more money, there is the HaiVision Video Furnace, which is used by, e.g., Brown University.

    I have no idea if your contract with Comcast will let you do this, but I believe that the Universities do it by restricting use to only people on campus, so you might be able to do the same.

    1. Re:IPTV over Multicast by adolf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Neat stuff, but how does it eliminate the need for set-top boxes?

  14. Re:Haft inch by jmanforever · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you use haft-inch and one inch do describe coax cables maybe your not the best guy for the job.

    Half inch, 1 inch, and "625" (which stands for 0.625", or 5/8 inch) are all industry-standard ways to specify the different sizes of 75 Ohm CATV coax Mr. anonymous dumbass. Yes, I am a CATV engineer.

  15. Re:Wait, you have ASTC TVs? by Kaenneth · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In the US, afaik, no, they use QAM encoding, same as cable modems. However, many TV's can tune 'Clear' (unencrypted) QAM and ATSC, and all channels that are available over the air (OTA) should be unencrypted on Cable (I believe it's a legal requirement, but cable co's continueally 'accidently' encrypt channels

  16. Re:Why haven't we heard about this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    way to confuse the government mandated OTA switch from analog to digital with Comcast's decision to turn off analog cable. You even managed to sound like a pompous, condescending ass while being completely wrong.

  17. Re:advice: by dgatwood · · Score: 5, Informative

    Better advice: sue. The FCC is requiring cable providers to maintain analog cable until 2012 unless they provide converters for their customers. Unless I'm misunderstanding, charging their customers to rent the boxes was NOT one of their options.

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  18. Re:Cut the cable by rotide · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you bothered to read the complete submission, you would have noticed it's free to their municipality due to an existing agreement.

    "Being a municipality, we are entitled to free expanded basic cable as a part of the franchise agreement back in 1982."

    At this point, he's trying to stop from using taxpayer money to pay for and run the cable boxes. Hence the point of the submission.

  19. Re:Cut the cable by alangerow · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In the summary it says: "Being a municipality, we are entitled to free expanded basic cable as a part of the franchise agreement back in 1982." Ditching basic cable will save the tax payers a whopping $0. Comcast signed a deal ... their town granted Comcast a monopoly on cable infrastructure, in return for free service. Now, it looks like the municipality is learning the joys of monopolies. They don't like Comcast's new policies, yet their own policies prevent competition from stepping in and offering them a solution. Now, they have to come to Slashdot for help.

  20. Re:Cut the cable by jimwelch · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Reasons for TV in a City:
    City/Police/Fire - Weather Disasters
    Fire - 24 hr shifts.

    --
    Never trust a man wearing a coat and tie!
  21. Re:Cut the cable by Adaeniel · · Score: 2, Informative
    The following was stated in the description of the problem:

    Being a municipality, we are entitled to free expanded basic cable as a part of the franchise agreement back in 1982.

    They are not 'paying' for the cable TV.

  22. Re:So? by LocalH · · Score: 3, Informative

    Analog broadcast to digital you mean, HD doesn't enter into it. If a station wanted to broadcast multiple SD channels instead of HD, they would have the FCC's blessing.

    Sorry to nitpick, but too many people think the digital transition was all about HD, when it was in reality nothing to do with HD.

    --
    FC Closer
  23. In addition to the technical solution by dkleinsc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Being a municipality, we are entitled to free expanded basic cable as a part of the franchise agreement back in 1982.

    Sounds like you may need to have a quick chat with your city's lawyer about whether Comcast is trying to do an end-run around that agreement. That section may make your problem their problem instead.

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    1. Re:In addition to the technical solution by dnahelicase · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Being a municipality, we are entitled to free expanded basic cable as a part of the franchise agreement back in 1982.

      Sounds like you may need to have a quick chat with your city's lawyer about whether Comcast is trying to do an end-run around that agreement. That section may make your problem their problem instead.

      Or your solution might be there problem. If they have violated the franchise agreement, don't fight it. If you're in Indiana, try giving Cinergy Metronet a call (http://cinergymetronet.com/) and see if they would be interested in moving in. When competition moves in, it tends to lower everyone's prices and improve service. I imagine they would provide boxless options to the city, and the taxpayers would benefit from having an additional choice.

  24. Re:Cut the cable by dcollins · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Enough of this shit. I want my cops & fire department on break to feel like they're well-trained and compensated, trusted professionals, not slave-wagers in the "all your base are belong to the company man" plan. (Also, I want tough and transparent oversight.) Otherwise you get the TSA.

    --
    We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
  25. Call the lawyers for a chat... by mhkohne · · Score: 5, Informative

    If the franchise agreement really says you get expanded basic in exchange for them getting the franchise, then I'd have a word with the township's lawyers. Depending on how the deal is stated, it's probably Comcast's problem to make this work, not yours. I suspect that if the town's lawyers had a word with Comcast's lawyers, then someone in Comcast's engineering department would sort things out right quick.

    --
    A thousand pounds of wood moving at 300 feet per minute. Don't get in the way.
  26. Re:Wait, you have ASTC TVs? by dsgrntlxmply · · Score: 5, Informative

    U.S. digital cable is not ATSC (8-VSB modulation) over-the-air broadcast signal compatible. Instead, the main MPEG2 payload is carried in 64-QAM or 256-QAM modulation, within RF channels that fit the usual US-standard 6 MHz spacing. Alongside this, are one or more "out-of-band" carriers that use a different modulation format and lower data rate, that carry channel maps and other administrative information. Finally, there is an upstream (settop box to head-end) channel in RF bands lower in frequency than the downstream RF, that is used for administrative purposes and for pay-per-view.

    The signal structures are described in published standards freely available from SCTE. The out-of-band and reverse channels have two different standards, reflecting the original developments by General Instrument (now Motorola) of one standard, and by Scientific Atlanta (now Cisco) of the other.

    Much (but not all) of the content is covered by "conditional access" (encryption), the details of which are of course unpublished.

  27. Re:advice: by Elros · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...who said there was no other solution and I had to pay $3 per month for each box.

    About the third line of the second quoted section.

  28. Re:advice: by Monchanger · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The problem isn't with his employer, hence no point resigning. Me I'd rather have people in government who in the interest of reducing government expense would actually care enough to doubt what some kid at Comcast says and look for advice elsewhere, despite the hordes of idiots who would surely be jerks when given the opportunity.

    Time to whip out the old "do not hire" list...
    Name : Larry Bagina.
    Reason: Quitter, can't read, anti-social dispenser of useless advice.

  29. Re:Why haven't we heard about this? by UnknowingFool · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, the analog over the air signal was phased out already. OTA should be digital now. The federal government gave coupons for free D-A converters for older TVs. That does not affect cable. Cable has capacity for both analog and digital; however, if a cable operator decides to switch to all digital, then that's a dispute between the cable operator and its customers.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  30. Re:advice: by Bobfrankly1 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Exactly where in the 'article' is the information about Comcast charging? It's not.

    Last time I used cable, the box came free with the service. If you wanted a better box, you paid more. ($10 more for HD, or DVR, or HD-DVR. Yeah, they were all the same.)

    You are partially correct. Comcast charges a per box fee past 4 boxes. If you only have 4 TVs, no extra fee.

  31. Re:Solution by valhallaprime · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not necessarily. The boxes are 24/7 vampires unless they're breakered every night at a strip or wall. My gym had to get a box from comcast last week for EVERY cardio machine that had an integrated TV. This meant 35 boxes. Each one runs warm, and also requires a remote control (no controls on the box). So in addition to 10-20 watts per box times 35, there's also 2X AA's times 35 once a year or so. If you're conservative with the numbers, that's 8.4 KWh a day of power draw that didn't exist before, regardless of a TV being on or not.

  32. STB per TV may be your best option by Zarniwoop · · Score: 4, Informative

    I actually work for a TV company... might be able to give a little insight.

    Most headends for hotels, hospitals and the like are comprised of a rack of STBs, each tuned to a specific channel. The output is modulated as an RF signal and combined with all the others, so the incoming digital signal is effectively converted to analog for redistribution on the local coax network.

    So, if you're wanting to display more than 32 services, you'll need at least that many STBs at your analog headend. You'll also need to manage the infrastructure to distribute it to the six buildings, which would probably mean running underground cables underground, and if there is any sort of distance you'd need some RF amplifiers. You might be able to get around some of that using something like a slingbox over IP, but again, added cost.

    Finally, there's the management aspect. What happens if a channel moves to another channel number? You'll have to retune the box. If a box goes down for any reason, you'll have to replace it as the channel will be knocked out. And one of the less fun aspects of managing a TV system is that people treat it as a utility... if it's down, expect to get a call, even at 3AM.

    If I were you, I'd push your cable company to donate STBs in order to keep your relationship rosy. That way, no $3/month fee (which does seem wrong based on your agreement), and none of the buildout/management headaches.

    Best of luck.

    --
    Still not dead.
  33. Missing the point entirely by Caerdwyn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wasn't part of the statement of problem that they are wall-mounted analog-only TVs, and therefore can't have boxes at the site of the TV? "Free boxes or my lawyers will eat you" doesn't help solve the problem, and city lawyers have better things to do than this. In any event, from the description of the situation Comcast is certainly not trying to "get around" anything; they are still providing basic cable for free. It's just not analog; the city has to go digital like everybody else. FCC mandate. The question is how to do so without converter boxes at the TV itself, not who to sue.

    --
    Everybody gets what the majority deserves.
  34. Re:Government waste by afidel · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yeah, because keeping guys working 12's with plenty of downtime entertained is such a waste....

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  35. Re:disconnect the tv's by Monchanger · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Really? People need this explained?

    Police and firemen are two kinds of jobs which can have different definitions of "work". Jobs in which you are waiting for a call (something to happen) often allow for personal time and even sleep such as in the case of firemen. Same deal for soldiers- you're always "at work", but not always on patrol.

    Hell, I was a third-shift NOC guy for a while and there was very little actual work to do during a routine shift.

  36. Re:Being ridiculous by TheOldBear · · Score: 2, Funny
    [disclaimer]I work for a cable provider but not Comcast[/disclaimer]

    Last year, to support CableCard / mCard / Tru2Way [the technology has been renamed several times] deployment, we tried to get a Panasonic Tru2Way television for our development lab.

    The distributor refused, as the local Cable company [that would be us] did not support Tru2Way

    --
    Caution: Do not stare into laser with remaining eye.
  37. Re:advice: by Z00L00K · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Then use four boxes to convert to analog and then amplify the signal into your own analog network.

    The alternative is to just flip them the bird and forget about having TV at all on the premises and stick to using radio channels. NPR would do fine.

    Life still goes on without TV.

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  38. Re:How many TV's?? by afidel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    More like Fire and Ambulance guys that live in the fire house. You work 12 hours on, only a small fraction of that will typically be active duty so filling the rest or the time with entertainment is fine. It's the price you pay for faster response times than a volunteer department that has to rush to the fire house before heading out to the fire.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  39. MDTA by pete-classic · · Score: 5, Informative

    First, disclaimers. I don't work for Comcast, but I do consult to them. I don't speak for Comcast in any way. I am under NDA, so I can't give you the sort of specific technical information you need. There may be any number of reasons why this thing wouldn't work in your circumstances, or why Comcast wouldn't choose to provide you one.

    Having said all of that, you might want to look into the MDTA. It's the "solution" you're sure exists ;-)

    It is POSSIBLE that one of these could be connected to your 1 inch (probably 850) hardline. But be aware that it doesn't mix with digital video services, though CableModems and MTAs work fine when hung off of it.

    -Peter

  40. Re:Wait, you have ASTC TVs? by commodore64_love · · Score: 2, Informative

    >>>Isn't digital cable ASTC compatible if it is not encrypted?

    Yes and no. ATSC chips are designed for the dual purpose of interpreting both the 8/16VSB and QAM signals. The question is whether or not the engineer enabled the QAM capability. In most cases the answer is yes but not always.

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
  41. Re:advice: by imadoofus · · Score: 5, Funny

    "There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now."

    Comcast: That'll be $12 per month please.

    --
    "pr0n": An anagram of "porn," possibly indicating the use of pornography. - www.microsoft.com
  42. Re:advice: by demonlapin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As someone noted upthread, this is probably going to see the most use in fire/EMS stations, where you have to pay guys to stand around and wait 24/7 even if nothing's going on. I'm pretty hard on government waste, but a thousand dollars a month so the firemen can have cable... it's a benefit that costs very little but provides them a great value.

  43. Why isn't Comcast using ATSC for "basic" cable? by swb · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There was a local newspaper column about Comcast's switch to digital encoding for everything and the requirement that everyone have a cable box (shades of pre-cable ready TV again). As with all things local newspaper + technology, it was shockingly short of facts.

    What I don't understand is why Comcast doesn't use in the clear ATSC digital encoding for their "analog to digital" conversion? I finally got a TV with an ATSC tuner and was surprised to see ATSC digital channels on the cable coming out of the wall without a box.

    Of course I know the conspiracy angle is Comcast just wants to nickel and dime everyone as much as possible, but the ability to just connect a TV to cable without a box has been a strength of cable vs. satellite (along with a simpler wiring scheme). When the box becomes a requirement to get ANY TV, I think they lose a competitive advantage over satellite.

    The article I read said they would be supplying 1-2 boxes for free to all subscribers. Given the relative stupidity of most people and the inherent added complexity this adds to cable, wouldn't it be more profitable in the long run to just encode via ATSC and not deal with all the nuisance of boxes and box support and box replacement, ad nauseum?

  44. Re:Why haven't we heard about this? by commodore64_love · · Score: 2, Funny

    I read a funny post recently from a New Comcast subscriber.
    Well it would have been funny if it had not been so sad.
    Quoting from memory:

    "They said they would take care of us when the Analog switched off. Just pay $10 a month and you'll get all your local stations with your old set. So I signed up. Great deal. Now less than a year later they are telling us we need to rent boxes for $5 per set, per month, if we want to keep getting our local stations. Thanks a lot Comsucks. Had I known that we would have bought the $40 converter boxes with those $40 coupons instead. Now it's too late."

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
  45. My mom's retirement community... by stevegee58 · · Score: 3, Funny

    When Comcast announced they were switching all these old ladies in assisted living over to digital I just knew it was going to be a disaster. Sure enough, the residents keep forgetting how to use them, and keep grabbing the old TV remote to change channels (which won't work duh).

    They've tried hiding the old TV remotes in drawers but then the residents get mad and want to know who stole them.

  46. Re:Wait, you have ASTC TVs? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In some places, it isn't so much that there's encryption than that the signal is slightly out of specification such that typical authorized devices work fine but that most editing tools can't access the video signal. Fox prime-time programming seems to be a consistent problem. For example, a recorded stream from a Firewire port on a cable box won't decode properly in MPEG StreamClip, but a TiVoToGo transfer can be extracted and converted to editable HDV using Roxio Toast Titanium. (MPEG StreamClip though is still needed to extract the 5.1 audio; Roxio's software only exports stereo.)

    This is separate from broadcast-flag problems where you can record a Copy-Once program but you're not allowed to play it back (on a computer). I've been seeing Copy Once asserted on Fox and ABC, but not both ABC affiliates in the same area for the same programming, yet the TiVo be completely immune from this flag.

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  47. Re:So? by WH44 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Comcast hierarchy, who said there was no other solution and I had to pay $3 per month for each box. Being a municipality, we are entitled to free expanded basic cable as a part of the franchise agreement back in 1982.

    It looks to me, like Mr. Government employee has a point, and that Comcast is contractually obligated to provide those "$3 per month" boxes for free - part of the cost of getting the franchise.

    Maybe then you guys will learn to count and balance your budgets.

    While the IT guy generally isn't responsible for balancing the budget, as you seem to think, he actually is doing a good job of it here by trying to get rid of unnecessary costs.

    What would you have him do? Roll over and take the added costs lying down?