Slashdot Mirror


No iPhone Apps, Please — We're British

GMGruman writes "The BBC has stirred up quite a row in Britain about a shocking use of taxpayer funds: creating iPhone apps to provide citizens services. As InfoWorld blogger Galen Gruman notes, it's apparently bad in Britain for the government to use modern technology during a recession, a mentality he likens as a shift from 'cool Britannia' to 'fool Britannia.'"

11 of 393 comments (clear)

  1. Maybe something everybody can use? by SigNuZX728 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    iPhone apps are great and all, but they're not much use to people who don't have iPhones. Why not work on regular old websites? Also you run the risk of Apple pulling your app from the store. Then there's thousands of taxpayer pounds down the drain.

    1. Re:Maybe something everybody can use? by JustinRLynn · · Score: 5, Funny

      iPhone is best (NSFW language)

    2. Re:Maybe something everybody can use? by SquarePixel · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They might be cheaper and more open, but there definitely isn't more Android phones around. If we go by marketshare, best bet is Symbian.

      However it doesn't really make any sense to make apps for such a divided market. Websites work just fine from a phone and they work for all.

    3. Re:Maybe something everybody can use? by qc_dk · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because I live in Scandinavia and changing tires(summer/winter) is most certainly relevant to safe driving?

      Plus, Scandinavia is one of them ebul sociamolist places without poor people, so getting your tires changed is ~$100 (cost of labour only), and I'm paying 60% tax. It makes no sense for me to work two days more to afford something I could do myself in 30 minutes.

  2. iphone by Frenger · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ok, but maybe the taxpayer dollars should be spent on services that everyone can make use of, not just iPhone users.

  3. no by Threni · · Score: 5, Insightful

    it's bad to waste money doing iphone apps when you could save money and do a website which people other then iphone users can use. Why no do android apps too? What about blackberry, symbian etc? max? linux? pc? Yes, it's a waste of money because most people haven't got an iphone, android phome, mac etc etc. Some people have a pc, and they probably have an internet connection, so a website will do. It's the BBC - they make/show tv shows.

  4. hmmmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Isn't it more that some people have suggested that making applications for unemployed people, that only run on phones costing 40 pounds (70$) a month is a bit poorly targeted. And that perhaps making websites for renewing car tax etc is more efficient than making apps that only run on a tiny minority of people's phones (any phone that can run an app can use the website.)

    Why on earth does the government need to spend loads of money making things slightly more convenient for a tiny minority of nerds and rich tech hipsters, when these people are perfectly able to use the existing websites.

    Sent from my phone, obviously!

  5. £10000 for a flashing light? by bool2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "...and was shocked that people would believe it to be unseemly and even objectionable that a government was using modern technology to help its citizens in noble tasks like avoiding becoming roadkill when their motorocycles break down or keep track of potential jobs without being stuck at home all day -- the very things you'd want government to do with your tax dollars" I can't imagine why anyone would object to spending £10000 on an app to make a flashing light. And I have to wonder how many unemployed people who own an expensive iPhone will be using government jobs websites... Lets face facts here. The iPhone is a heavily locked down platform run by control freaks in California and owned by a very small percentage of the population. Tell me again why should my tax go towards supporting that platform?

  6. Supporting citizens vs supporting a platform by Dinjay · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Here is the BBC story if anyone is interested: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/10514367.stm

    Governments using modern technology to support/educate users should be encouraged - it will assist the UK IT industry employment, grow UK IT capabilities and give citizens the information they need when they need it. But at the same time, a government should be careful not strongly benefit one closed source platform over other platforms. Of course this doesn't mean that the UK government should build applications in all mobile platforms - just that they should build at lease some software application on another platform - preferably an open source one.

    --
    You break all the laws of physics and you seriously think there wouldn't be a price?
    1. Re:Supporting citizens vs supporting a platform by dave420 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Fuck whether the platform is closed or not - the biggest problem is that public money should be spent on public benefit. Not everyone has an iPhone, so an iPhone-only app is stupid. At least make it a normal website, which anyone with a browser can access.

  7. It's the upcoming cuts, not the recession by Christianson · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The issue here isn't that there's iPhone apps being developed during a recession, it's that money is being invested in a duplication of services when the government is looking to slash spending by up to 40% across the board. When we're looking at a devastation of public services, it's hard to condone spending intended to benefit a minority of Britons with access to a luxury device.