Slashdot Mirror


Has Any Creative Work Failed Because of Piracy?

Andorin writes "Anyone familiar with the piracy debate knows about the claims from organizations like the RIAA that piracy causes billions of dollars in damages and costs thousands of jobs. Other studies have concluded differently, ranging from finding practically no damages to a newer study that cites 'up to 20%' as a more accurate number (PDF). I figure there's got to be an easier way to do this, so here's my question: Does anyone know of any creative works that were provably a financial failure due to piracy? The emphasis on 'provably' is important, as some form of evidence is necessary. Accurately and precisely quantifying damages from p2p is impossibly hard, of course, but answering questions like this may lead us to a clearer picture of just how harmful file sharing really is. I would think that if piracy does cause some amount of substantial harm, we would see that fact reflected in our creative works, but I've never heard of a work that tanked because people shared it online."

4 of 1,115 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Lady Gaga sucks??? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 4, Funny

    I love lady Gaga to death!

    That's an interesting way to murder.

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  2. Re:Lady Gaga sucks??? by Soilworker · · Score: 5, Funny

    Leeaavvee GAGAA AAAALONNEE!!!

  3. Re:Lady Gaga sucks??? by Mister+Kay · · Score: 5, Funny

    Speak for yourself there buddy, I love lady Gaga to death!

    Sounds to me like a case of.... bad romance...
    <Insert groans here>

  4. Re:Excellent call! by idontgno · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now you're just being repetitive.

    --
    Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.