Slashdot Mirror


Nvidia's $200 GTX 460 Ups Bargain Performance

NervousNerd writes "Nvidia's first DirectX 11 offerings ran hot and offered a negligible performance difference compared to ATI's Radeon HD 5800 series for the cost. Also missing was the $200 mid-range part. But that stopped when Nvidia released the GTX 460 based on a modified version of their infamous Fermi architecture. The GTX 460 offers incredible performance for the price and soundly beats ATI's $200 offering, the HD 5830."

10 of 197 comments (clear)

  1. Bargain? $200? by ajlitt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

  2. Re:Bargain? $200? by dnaumov · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Can we have ONE video card news posting discussion without a flood of people preaching how it's supposedly stupid to spend anything more than 100$ on a videocard? Please? People have different needs and expectations.

  3. Re:Bargain? $200? by yincrash · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't think it's stupid to spend more than $100 on a video carrd (I definitely have), but it does seem hard to argue that $200 is a bargain priced video card. I would probably call it mid-range?

  4. Re:Bargain? $200? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Did you consult the dictionary before typing that? Bargain isn't related to how much something costs, but how much it is worth compared to how much it costs. This is a bargain.

  5. Re:Bargain? $200? by LWATCDR · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well for a hard core gamer that is pretty cheap. I do not spend that much on video cards but if it is your hobby.
    Ever see how much golf clubs costs? Or motorcycle gear? How about the cost of gas for a boat?
    This isn't that bad in comparison.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  6. Re:Bargain? $200? by radicalpi · · Score: 5, Funny

    If 200$ is mid-range, what does that make 300$ and 400$ videocards, assuming we call 500-600$ videocards the high-end?

    Upper middle class with distinction

  7. Re:Bargain? $200? by MonChrMe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I would probably call it mid-range?

    So would the TFS, apparently. I guess Taco's got some cash to play with. :)

    That said, if it beats out the other cards in it's price range, and has the same price then it's probably fair to call it a bargain within that slice of the market.

  8. Soundly beats the 5830? by dward90 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Soundly beating the 5830 is a stretch at best. On Tom's Hardware's Benchmark Results, the 460 is outperformed by the 5830 in every benchmark, Crysis, and AvP test. It loses sparingly in the rest of the games, but calling it the clear better of the 2 is just isn't realistic.

    --
    My other sig is clever.
  9. Holy Slashvertising Batman by damn_registrars · · Score: 4, Funny

    The summary reads like it was written by someone at nVidia; based on the summary you'd think this card could do cold fusion and mow my lawn at the same time while creating mind-blowing graphical displays.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  10. Re:There's only one problem by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Interesting

    An announcement doesn't mean much without a release. Also, I'd guess that nVidia will be offering updates fairly soon as well. Basically updates to cards are generally either because there's a new architecture, which isn't happening for either company in this case since that take a much longer time, or a new lithography process. I'm not sure what the companies are looking at next, but Global Foundries has a 32nm node online now. They could be looking at using that.

    You have to remember that development continues all the time, and even as a card is being released the next gen, and the gen after that and probably even more than that are being worked on. Takes a long time to bring something from idea to released silicon. So this isn't a race where a company get ahead and the other one can never catch up. Were that the case, well then ATi would be long behind now, because the 8800 series was completely unexpected, and had performance ATi could not match. They had to delay their launch a cycle and still their hardware wasn't a match for it. However, as time went on, they caught up and now have exceeded nVidia in many regards (certainly in being first with DX11).

    The only way this would be "too late" in any respect is if ATi already had a better card out. Remember that people do not wait forever to buy parts. You can't say "But something better will come in a few months!" because something better will ALWAYS come in a few months. Do that and you'll never have a system. If someone buys a computer now, and wants to spend $200ish on a video card, the 460 is a realistic choice.

    Also note that despite the 480s being hot, and late to the game, it isn't a failure. They moved plenty of units. Not near as many as they'd like I'm sure, but people bought those things left and right.