Slashdot Mirror


China Shoots Down Another Satellite

An anonymous reader writes "It was reported this weekend that China shot down another of its satellites in January this year. 'The website of Hong Kong-based Phoenix TV said the anti-satellite missile test, if confirmed, is likely related to the missile interception test, which occurred at the peak of a dispute between Beijing and Washington on a massive US arms sales deal to Taiwan. During the interception test, US agencies spotted two missiles launched from two locations from the Chinese mainland, colliding outside the atmosphere, a Pentagon spokesperson said.' I guess ballistic trajectories that intersect with orbital ones don't count as 'weapons in space.'"

14 of 221 comments (clear)

  1. More broken china by NEDHead · · Score: 4, Funny

    in orbit. Great.

  2. What the hell? by nebaz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Nice way to make even more space junk. Nice going, China. Are you trying to destroy access to LEO over time?

    --
    Rhymes that keep their secrets will unfold behind the clouds.There upon the rainbow is the answer to a neverending story
    1. Re:What the hell? by blair1q · · Score: 3, Funny

      Not a problem.

      We now have a laser that can zap the junk out of space.

      http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-10682693

      But I still say what we really need is this guy:

      http://www.imdb.com/media/rm3025049600/tt0077066

    2. Re:What the hell? by jpmorgan · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The article is unclear, but it sounds more like China tested their ASAT weapon against a launched suborbital target, not an actual satellite as the headline suggests.

      A fast ballistic trajectory that either immediately returns to earth, or returns after a couple of orbits, would be a comparatively responsible way of testing these weapons. A well designed test would have most of the same challenges as firing on an actual satellite, without leaving a semi-permanent debris cloud.

    3. Re:What the hell? by cyfer2000 · · Score: 3, Informative

      They make radars for F15, F18, F22... Patriot and a lot of other missiles. And Raytheon also invented microwave oven.

      --
      There is a spark in every single flame bait point.
  3. Will the debris be a problem? by DarkFencer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Does anyone know how much of an issue the debris from these satellites are? From the perspective of collisions in orbit more so than what happens when it lands (I imagine the parts are small enough that reentry will take care of them).

  4. God damn it, China! by kurokame · · Score: 3, Informative

    Didn't you make enough bloody space junk the first time? NEO pollution is becoming a serious issue, and this isn't helping anyone.

    1. Re:God damn it, China! by LWATCDR · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually I believe that this test didn't contribute to that.
      It sounds as if the intercept was at sub orbital speeds. IE it was a missile interception test.
      Frankly this was miss titled big time.
      Not that it is a good thing but it may not be as bad as you think.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  5. Another world record attempt by kamukwam · · Score: 3, Funny

    They always want to be the best in everything. Now it seems that the Chinese are trying to become the country with the most objects in earth orbit.

  6. GPS and communication satellites by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is part of developing the technology to take out GPS and other communication satellites in case of a confrontation with the U.S.A. . Much of the U.S. war fighting capability is highly dependent on GPS and satellite based communication. The Chinese military is preparing to fight a war against the U.S. (this is completely independent of whether or not they are planning to fight such a war). The scary part of this is that even if current planners have no intention of ever fighting a war against the U.S. history has shown that when military and political leaders believe that they are in a position to win such a war they often choose to wage it even if a rational analysis says that it is a bad idea (see World War I).

    --
    The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
  7. Circular story by bsDaemon · · Score: 5, Funny

    The story, on a Chinese website (.cn domain) is reporting that the US is reporting that China shot down the satellite. I'm not sure how reliable any of this really is.

  8. The actual news in the article by quatin · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Apparently people have completely missed the point of this article. Space junk, yes it's a problem, but did no one grasp the importance that one nation is capable of SHOOTING DOWN SATELLITES?!?

    It's obviously aimed at countering US ballistic missile technology that we're selling to Taiwan. Perhaps not to intercept the missiles, but to destroy US GPS satellites so the US missiles won't track. This is just as important as ballistic missile interception program. There's going to be another arms race to have satellites that can "counter" incoming missiles and missiles that can counter the counter on the satellite.

    Lastly, can we please stop arming other countries. It always backfires and we end up getting shot by the same bullets we gave out.

    1. Re:The actual news in the article by glwtta · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Perhaps not to intercept the missiles, but to destroy US GPS satellites so the US missiles won't track.

      GPS satellites are at 20,000 km - if the Chinese could hit those, that would really be something!

      All the satellites shot down so far have been well under 1,000 km.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
  9. Re:Not surprising by superdana · · Score: 4, Funny

    Building nuke-powered Boomers/attack sub at a rate of 1-2 EACH.

    Oh no! At that rate, they'll have more than fifty by next!