Slashdot Mirror


Earth As an Extrasolar Planet

sciencehabit writes "Astronomers have a theory that they can detect whether a planet light years away will be habitable by just looking at how its sun is reflected in its atmosphere. To test the idea, they pretended that they were observing Earth from a distant object — in this case, the moon. And sure enough, they picked up critical components for life in Earth's atmosphere: ozone, oxygen, sodium, and nitrogen."

12 of 83 comments (clear)

  1. This just in by gmuslera · · Score: 5, Funny

    NASA has finally proved that planet Earth is (still, at least) habitable! We knew that all that investment will bring us new knowledge some day.

    1. Re:This just in by Arancaytar · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, they needed a control experiment to compare their findings to when they prove otherwise in 20 years.

  2. Re:Why not point Cassini back at us? by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Cassini is probably not designed to be sensitive to those signatures. It's built for Saturn and co. It cost a lot to add & launch extra's outside of mission objective.

  3. Re:Proving What by MichaelSmith · · Score: 3, Informative

    It looks like they focused on only measuring certain atmospheric things, but this proves nothing as far as extrasolar planets go.

    Free oxygen on any planet tells you that something is making oxygen. In our case it is the plants which we treat so badly: turning them into newspapers, etc. Oxygen is so reactive that its presence tells you something must be going on. Mars used to have free oxygen but it combined with iron in the soil, turning it red: Iron Oxide.

  4. Only works on eclipsed light. by pigeon768 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This technique only works on light that passes through the planet's atmosphere. In this case, during a lunar eclipse, they pointing a telescope at the part of the moon that was reflecting the light that had traveled through the Earth's atmosphere. They found that the moon had absorption lines resulting from interactions with Earth's atmosphere.

    The technique would work if the Earth occulted the Sun from Cassini's viewpoint, but such occultations are rare.

    1. Re:Only works on eclipsed light. by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 3, Insightful

      yes of course, lets worry deeply about detecting (from light years upon light years away) a form of life that has only be theorized to be possible, and if exists is most likely in an environment that is totally incompatible with ours, thus making any contact with such life forms extremely difficult at best..

      or you know, we could figure out how to detect life forms similar to our own, then try and branch out from that knowledge base once we accomplish that.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
  5. Re:Narrow-minded folks by cheesecake23 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    wHo says that life needs oxygen? Even on our planet are living beings who do not need oxygen at all. Black smoker bacterias for example. Life develops according to outer circumstances. Darwin. Read it. it's just plain stupid to believe extra-terrestial life can only develop on Earth 2.

    Thank God we have enlightened ACs teaching scientists how to do things! I'm sure they never considered the points you raised.

    To address your point: they do NOT assume that life needs oxygen. However, the presence of significant amounts of oxygen in a planetary atmosphere is a strong indicator of life. This is because the gas is so reactive that it gets removed from the atmosphere very quickly. The only reason we have oxygen in our air is because it is continuously put there by photosynthesis.

  6. The Galileo probe already did this by De_Boswachter · · Score: 4, Informative

    "A search for life on Earth from the Galileo spacecraft", Nature, 1993 C. Sagan et al., http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v365/n6448/abs/365715a0.html

    1. Re:The Galileo probe already did this by interactive_civilian · · Score: 4, Informative

      For those without access to Nature, a Google Scholar search turns up a freely downloadable PDF of the full article.

      PDF Link

      I remember reading about this in Sagan's "The Pale Blue Dot", and thought it was such an awesome idea. I'm looking forward to reading the original paper. :)

      --
      "Empathise with stupidity, and you're halfway to thinking like an idiot." - Iain M. Banks
  7. WTF? by mcneely.mike · · Score: 5, Funny

    I for one welcome our new Earth overl-...... wait a second.....HEY, that's me!

    --
    soylentnews.org Go there to enjoy the people!
  8. Re:Proving What by murdocj · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Slashdot summary was really, really bad. They didn't pretend to be observing the earth from the moon, they analyzed the spectra of light passing through the earth's atmosphere and reflected off of the moon. The idea is that this is similar to analyzing the light passing through a planet's atmosphere as it transits in front of a star. So it's not as crazy as it sounds.

  9. RTFA by pigeon768 · · Score: 3, Informative

    So, now to apply this to an extrasolar planet, we have to have the planet reflect the light of its sun back at the Earth, which means that their sun is already between them and us (counting "between" as being able to project the vector from here to their sun upon the vector from here to the extrasolar planet, and result in a vector of lesser magnitude than the vector from here to the extrasolar planet). And we're supposed to be able to isolate any of the light from that planet apart from its sun?

    You misunderstand the experiment. For this idea to work, the planet has to be between us and the star. Exactly between - as in, the planet is eclipsing its sun, from our point of view. They're not detecting light that's been reflected off a planet, they're detecting light that's been filtered through a planet's atmosphere.

    This is something we've already done with large gas giant planets. The 'new' thing is that we did it with a planet the size of earth, with its significantly thinner atmosphere.