Slashdot Mirror


Firefox Tab Candy Alpha

Nunavut writes in with a note from TechCrunch on Aza Raskin's latest Mozilla goodie, Tab Candy. "Be sure to watch the video for a full overview — from the looks of it, it seems as if Tab Candy is sort of like Apple's Expose feature mixed with their Spaces feature, both of which are baked into OS X. For those who don't use a Mac, basically these features allow you to zoom out and get a bird's-eye-view of all your windows (or tabs, in this case) that are open — and you can also arrange open windows (or again, tabs, in this case) in certain spaces so they're clumped together. This allows you to more easily find what you're looking for with so many tabs open." Here's Raskin's blog post, the download link, and the FAQ.

29 of 189 comments (clear)

  1. Open? by Fusen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Am I the only one that opens up tabs to read the content and then closes the tab after doing so? I don't really see why someone would have like 20+ tabs constantly just sitting open.

    1. Re:Open? by Knoeki · · Score: 4, Informative

      I keep tabs open for certain sites. A bunch of sites (forums, etc) that I want to check regularly, and some other things I'll want to have a look at now and then.

      --
      [ irc.p2p-network.net -> #zomgwtfbbq ][ http://zomgwtfbbq.info ]
    2. Re:Open? by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes.

      (If that's all we wanted to do we'd have stuck with the 'back' button).

      --
      No sig today...
    3. Re:Open? by Joe+Jay+Bee · · Score: 2, Informative

      Thus speaks a man who has never experienced the addictive tab-craziness of TV Tropes ;)

    4. Re:Open? by vlm · · Score: 2, Informative

      Am I the only one that opens up tabs to read the content and then closes the tab after doing so? I don't really see why someone would have like 20+ tabs constantly just sitting open.

      You're just lacking good examples of things to keep "permanently open".

      "tabs" that I never close on my ipod touch, my ipad, or firefox:

      Local NWS weather radar direct link (radar.weather.gov/Thumbs/???.png where ??? is your local three letter code that has nothing to do with IACO airport codes)

      Local NWS 7 day forecast for my home, a rather complicated (bookmarked) URL.

      A vhfdx.net ham radio "activity map" for the 6 meter band on my continent, at least during Es season (which probably makes zero sense to non-amateur radio operators, but trust me its quite handy to see at a glance if anythings going on).

      A "club news/club announcement" blog that is updated roughly daily.

      My personal "feed on feeds" web based RSS aggregator.

      At work on firefox for half a decade or so, I have always had a tab open on RT, and a couple internal apps.

      Could I just use bookmarks? Yeah, but thats clicky clicky clicky hell and since I scan all those pages every time I do "anything" why not leave them open? Its sort of a "cache" between me and my bookmarks.

      As far as having 20 open tabs, I use LRU expiration, if there is a tab I don't look at "all the time" then I stop leaving it open... Some people are the digital equivalent of hoarders.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    5. Re:Open? by danwesnor · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you close it, eventually you have to open it again. It takes like 0.08375 seconds to open a web page these days. Some people just aren't as patient as you are.

    6. Re:Open? by MacGyver2210 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      AMEN to that. I watched this guy wantonly open tabs to things he probably would only glance at, and then complain there's too many tabs.

      Hey, instead of Tab Candy(which seems like a hell of a lot of work to organize tabs while browsing) how about you just learn to properly use a tabbed browser?

      Most people can manage information well enough in their head that they don't need 15-25 tabs open at once.

      On top of that, it's actually faster to just open a second copy of the browser with a different group of tabs than it is to organize with Tab Candy.

      --
      If the only way you can accept an assertion is by faith, then you are conceding that it can't be taken on its own merits
    7. Re:Open? by BrokenHalo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Otherwise, bookmarks and history.

      Same here. In fact, I have long ago given up on organising my bookmarks. There was a time when I used to spend some time categorising them into a hierarchy that made sense to me, but it was quite a big job. But now that Firefox automatically searches bookmarks by whatever keywords I set, there's no longer any point.

      Truth is, I could probably ditch my bookmarks file with little pain - there's a big chunk of it that dates back to the mid '90s (when I was using Nutscrape and/or Mozilla), and I've never got around to verifying how many of those URLs actually exist any more. I just leave it there as a little piece of history.

    8. Re:Open? by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Same here, first with Session Saver then with FF's built-in tab restorer.

      Mix it in with the awesome bar, and bookmarks are almost useless.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
  2. Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Now, give me a feature which autosizes the thumbnails on the thumbnail view automatically, weighted by how often I go to the site.

  3. Reinventing the window? by kangsterizer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When I want to group tabs, I make new windows. In fact i rarely have more than 5 tabs per window, then 2-3 windows open. It's easy to navigate and organized, and also happens to be the way it's supposed to be done in current operating systems.

    Maybe I"m just old school.

    1. Re:Reinventing the window? by sakdoctor · · Score: 4, Funny

      Let's see, I've got multiple workspaces, with multiple instances of firefox running, and each has one or more tab.

      But something is missing. It's just not fine grained enough.
      If only tabs could have tabs!

    2. Re:Reinventing the window? by je+ne+sais+quoi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's what I thought at first when I watched the video also. However, there's one big difference -- tab candy seems to remember your groups of tabs, but is still flexible about creating and destroying them, and it will be searchable. If you're using virtual desktops and sets of windows, you can group those, but I always found the groupings to be clumsy and my workflow changes often enough that just calling one desktop "e-mail" and other "ssh session to X server" just doesn't work. Similarly, with a browser, you have to go through a lot of trouble organizing the windows and tabs and unless you've got your browser doing the same things all the time, it isn't worth a lot of organization.

      After thinking about what they were doing for a bit, I realized that what they just came up with is essentially a spacial manager for the bookmark menu that makes adding and removing bookmarks and groups of bookmarks easy and rapid. Let's say you have three folders in your bookmark menu, the tab candy seems to give you a way to see and manage the contents of all those folders rapidly. I think it'll be cool, but it's hard to say how useful it will be. The only other thing like it that I know of for browsers is Safari's "Top Sites" feature. I find that fairly useful, often if it's a site I use often I don't even bother looking for the site in my menubar, I just open a new tab (which shows the top site window) and click on the thumbnail. It requires less thinking than finding something in a bookmark menu.

      --
      Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is the war room!
    3. Re:Reinventing the window? by jginspace · · Score: 2, Informative
    4. Re:Reinventing the window? by grumbel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Tab itself are already a reinvention of the window, what this add-on does looks closer to reinventing the bookmark. As the way one can organize the tabs into categories and stuff is much closer to what you get today with bookmarks, then what you can do with tabs. Which raises the question how that is going to work in practice, as in practice I don't consider tabs to be permanent 'links' to webpages, but temporary containers, i.e. does your whole carefully created layout go down the toiled if you decide to use your "research" window for searching for the newest video game or whatever? Do you have to remember to always use a new window for a new webpage? Or is there magic working that makes webpages 'stick' to a tab? I think for this to work properly one might need to not only reinvent the tab, but also the way the forward/back buttons work, as their use doesn't really make much sense if you lay all tabs flat on a 2D plane.

      Anyway, overall it looks like an interesting add-on and like an implementation of a zoomable interface that actually might work very well for some use cases and for those looking for a simpler enhancement for tabs there is always Tree Style Tabs.

    5. Re:Reinventing the window? by shellbeach · · Score: 2

      Humour aside, this problem of tab groups got solved yonks ago with the TreeStyleTabs extension. Tabs are in a vertical tree, indented to show their relationship to one another, and the position -- and relationships -- between tabs can be adjusted by dragging and dropping tabs.

      It basically does all that this Tab Candy thing claims to do, but much more effectively and without needing swanky eye candy. Plus you can see all your tabs all the time; you don't have to zoom out.

      Not that Tab Candy doesn't look neat, but I seriously question its practical usefulness over something like treestyletabs.

    6. Re:Reinventing the window? by FiloEleven · · Score: 2

      I use TreeStyleTabs and it's better than nothing, but it's far from optimal. I don't like giving up a sixth of my width to keep everything in view, and it doesn't play nicely with all websites--sometimes you have to hide the tabs in order to see a whole video frame, other times text goes off the right side of the screen without a horizontal scroll bar to see it, etc. I recently tried the Top view, more like a conventional tab bar, but then the trees expand horizontally which is confusing and not useful.

      I think Tab Candy strikes a nice balance. All tabs in your current tab group are displayed across the top, taking up minimal space. With a button press (there had better be a keyboard shortcut), you can bring up all of your tab groups and pick the one you want. This simplifies navigation and doesn't sacrifice real-estate. It won't work for everyone, but it looks perfect for my browsing habits.

  4. Tree Style Tabs by Leynos · · Score: 5, Informative

    The "Tree Style Tabs" add on is great for managing your browsing. It gives your tabs context, lets you collapse groups of tabs and move tabs from one group to another. That, and having the tabs vertically arranged lets you have far more on screen at once and make better use of a widescreen monitor. Solving many of the problems addressed by Tab Candy.

    I'm really surprised more people don't use it. It's the one thing now preventing me from switching to Chrome.

    --
    "Did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage?"
    1. Re:Tree Style Tabs by Zerth · · Score: 2, Informative

      chrome --enable-vertical-tabs

  5. I prefer tabsbookmarks by improfane · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've never used bookmarks properly. I just type in the topmost URL and then navigate to the page I want. Terrible, I know. There are many different ways to use the web, I've personally seen a lot of the following with friends and family:

    • Use search engine terms to get to websites
    • Put URL in search engine to get to websites
    • Use bookmarks to get everywhere: I know people who have a huge bookmark list, organised into folders
    • Use only one website and click links in comments/profiles from there (farcebook)
    • Use portal pages (Yahoo!, MSN, Google)

    One problem I have with bookmarks is that it's so 'open' and available to people to browse. I wouldn't want my bookmarks to be seen by everyone. What I want is a 'super lightweight tab' architecture where a tab actually represents the bookmark and only loads if I click it, which definitely beats loading 100s of tabs on startup...

    I switch between browsers and computers so much that keeping my bookmarks sycned would be too hard to be worth it. A few years ago I was more of a explorative surfer, now I tend to limit myself to very few daily websites and go from there.

    --
    Slashdot needs Geekcode | Can anyone recommend any good SCIFI? My tastes: Foundation, Startide Rising, CITY, Ringworld,
  6. What about the Firefox Showcase extension? by SpzToid · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Saw the video of TFA and it seems Showcase does The Job, and is 'mature' as well; while not requiring so much manual intervention (which others might value as a Good Thing). I've been using it for at least a year and really like Showcase.

    https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1810

    --
    You can't be ahead of the curve, if you're stuck in a loop.
  7. Not only TV Tropes but other wikis as well by tepples · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Thus speaks a man who has never experienced the addictive tab-craziness of TV Tropes ;)

    Or Wikipedia. Or Encyclopedia Dramatica. Or Ward's Wiki and Everything2, which were probably the originators of this densely hyperlinked style that encourages hyperbrowsing.

  8. Sidebars need a wider screen by tepples · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm really surprised more people don't use it.

    Vertical tab lists and other sidebars really need a monitor at least 1280px wide. Some people such as myself have an old 1024x768px monitor or a netbook with a 1024x600px monitor, and more and more web sites are designed to run maximized across the entire width of such a monitor.

  9. Tab Mix Plus by veganboyjosh · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Until recently, my internet experience called for no more than 10 tabs to be open, ever. I've started a new job which calls for a lot of browsing on a lot of websites. The other day I got up to 80 tabs open at the same time.

    I'm a huge fan of the Tab Mix Plus Firefox add-on. It allows you to have multiple rows of tabs, and even set unread tabs and current tab to a different colors. Very helpful for visually seeing what's been read, where the new tabs are, where the actual tab is for the page you're on, etc. Especially when there's 20+ open tabs on your screeen at once.

    https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1122/

  10. This is a good example... by Coppit · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is a good example of a solution devised by an engineer. Somehow they think that peering at icons, dragging and dropping them, and organizing them into a hierarchy is really something the average user would want to do. The average user will find this solution worse than the problem. A better solution is to simply do what Chrome does and open new tabs next to the originating tab. It doesn't solve all the world's problems, but it's automatic and solves a couple of them.

  11. Stability? by the-bobcat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    While I like the idea and can easily imagine the fun/productivity of this on a touch based machine, what happens when a single tab goes haywire and crashes everything? I wish the Firefox devs would take the idea from Chrome and implement individual tab processes. With multi-core machines ever on the rise I can't see why not.

  12. Re:Basic tab managment features missing... by clgoh · · Score: 2, Informative

    Undo closed tab is there: Ctrl-shift-t

    Also, in History menu: Recently Closed Tabs submenu.

  13. I don't see the point of this by GreatBunzinni · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The example which is given in the video from TFA to try to demonstrate the need for this tab candy nonsense is how a clumsy user can fill a tab bar with countless unrelated tabs. Yet, from the example which was presented, there is absolutely no need for that sort of crap. Let me explain.

    In the example the user starts off with a browser window which already has tons of tabs, which is already in itself a sign that the user doesn't know what he is doing. From there, a case is presented where the user suddenly feels the need to start a new search, which happens to be completely unrelated to anything that he was already doing. Well, in that scenario, the user could very well do the very same thing that any semi-rational user does when he finds himself on that very same situation: open a new browser window dedicated to that search and go crazy with the search results. There, fixed. There is no need for this tab candy crap, searches/online tasks are perfectly compartmentalized, the tab bar is clean and cluttered, the navigation to/from opened pages becomes simpler... Everyone wins.

    Now, let's look at what this tab candy crap brings to the table. So a clueless user who is perfectly incapable of organizing his workflow finds himself with a single browser window with dozens of opened tabs. He suddenly feels the need to open another dozen tabs to perform a completely independent task. According to TFA, the solution to his problems comes in the form of this tab candy crap. Yet, the only thing that it is capable of doing is offering yet another needlessly cumbersome step to do nothing more than provide a different, resource-expensive way to present to the user the tabs which he has opened.

    So, in other words, this tab candy crap is nothing more than a window manager built into a browser. I mean, manually group tabs? List the tab groups which are currently opened? Put some tabs on the foreground while putting others on the background? Present the user with small icons representing the opened tab? If you replace "tabs" with "windows" you are describing pretty much any window manager out there. So why exactly is it a good idea to build a window manager into a browser?

    --
    Slashdot, fix your code or at least hire someone who is competent at it to do it for you.
  14. How I would use it by mixuone · · Score: 2, Interesting

    To me, tabs are a part of my reading workflow - somewhere between bookmarks and speed dial. Tab Candy, if implemented, would be somewhere between bookmarks and normal tabs: permanent storage, but for task-specific purposes.

    The reason why I use piles of tabs (50+ per window if necessary) is that I prefer not to do mental task switching between searching for something and looking for a solution/an idea/reading.

    So I will do a search on something, open new tabs until I am satisfied that I have opened all the promising links, then close the search and start reading the tabs I have open. I will first glance at the content, and will just close the tabs that don't look like they are worth reading. Then I just read, leave the best tabs open for reference and start doing whatever the search was for (coding, writing etc.).

    I currently use different windows to keep separate tab groups for each different task (e.g. email, coding, search for best widget). Whatever I use a lot or whatever I think I should look at again soon gets added to Speed Dial (e.g. Slashdot, interesting articles), and less frequent stuff that I want to keep for reference goes to the bookmarks pile. The only problem is that closing a browser window means I either lose all the stuff I haven't read in that window or I have to bookmark them.

    Tab Candy would seem perfect for temporarily storing a window (e.g. reference material for project X) for later without the hassle of bookmark management.

    I know it's "just a different kind of bookmark management system" from some perspective, but so is Speed Dial - which I consider essential.