Above please find a list of people who commented without reading the original source material. Which is the patent itself, not the completely factually incorrect news article.
It is not a patent on wireless charging. It's a patent for a specific way of relaying power through a keyboard to a mouse.
In other words, a wireless keyboard and mouse where you don't need to change the batteries.
Which is them just shooting their own ridiculously expensive rechargable AA battery business in the foot.
"How do I reach them?"
Twitter.
"Do they know I'm performing nearby next month?"
Twitter.
"How can I tell them I have a new album coming out?"
Twitter.
If your assumption is that only people in the US, the UK, Canada, and Australia speak English, then yes, you can say that only 6% of the world's population speaks English. But your assumption would be very, very wrong.
Also, as Javascript is not and never claimed to be a natural language, I don't understand why you think you need to learn English before using it. The definition of "for" in Javascript is so far away from the definition of "for" in English that knowing English doesn't help you grasp how it is used Javascript. Certainly English helps, but if enough documentation exists in another given language, it shouldn't be much harder to learn any given computer language without learning to speak English.
It's not ObjectiveC, nor Objective C. It is Objective-C. Congrats to the two of you who got that right. The rest of you, please don't code in any C-based languages, your lack of attention to details would be disasterous.
Yeah, I was one of them, only Z-80 before 6502. Difference is with assembly you know you're in the danger zone. C looks safe until you're at the bottom of the pit with bamboo stakes coming through your chest. Also, the scope of what we were writing was much narrower. Pong is easy to code, and so is Space Invaders. The structure is straight forward and fits functional programming well. Hello World on an iPhone is more complicated. It's a whopping one line of code, but you have to understand a lot of concepts right off the bat.
For an 11-year old who's learning, I can't imagine C is a good fit. He'll want to spend his time making working code and not chasing crashes. Something safer.
If you believe the data shouldn't be destroyed, have your contracting office send the government contracting officer letter requesting the requirement be deffered until the end of the new contract.
I agree, your post is ignorant. You ignorantly assume that only online authentication systems can impose a delay. But in realty, just about all systems, languages, and OS's have an easy to use delay function and that can easily be added just about anywhere, including in an authentication system. In POSIX C, sleep(60000); will do nicely.
Encrypting your hash files is supported and not hard, and also sticking it somewhere other than the default location helps, but there is still such a thing as an incompetent sysadmin.
If they can get their modified authentication system running in place of mine, I'm pretty sure I've already lost.
The second component is transformed into a CAPTCHA image and then protected using evolution of a two-dimensional dynamical system close to a phase transition, in such a way that standard brute-force attacks become ineffective.
You don't need a bunch of mumbo jumbo to make a brute force attack ineffective, all you need to do is lock the account after x failed login attempts.
It's very common among my friends to use a parent's name when tagging children. Am I to be expected to be able to ID all of my friends' kids? Mark needs to come out of Zuckerland an see how people actually use his product.
The QAM tuner can get all clear channels. Some places you get more than just networks. I get Braves TV in HD, for example. I also get about 5-10 other SD digital channels (NASA, etc.). But your point is correct for fiber systems.
My point is, a lot of people are paying for the box when they don't need to, and until the FCC addresses that, cable viewers will still keep renting the cablecos box.
In related news, my cableco is still hit-or-miss then you call and ask for CableCARD, even though they've been using them for more than 3 years. One rep I called had never heard of them, the next knew they had the dual-channel version and that they charged $5 for them ($2 each for the single channel).
The barrier isn't technological, it's psychological. My mom has a cable box she doesn't need. The installer told her she needed to get cable. I told her to take it back and demand a refund. She won't. During the 80's, you had to have a box to get channels above 13, because that was the highest a TV could tune. Then the FCC mandated cable-ready TV's, and you didn't need a box at all except for pay TV. There was no education or information given to the public, so a lot of people went through the 90's still believing they need a box, and the cablecos still play on that. The only was to solve the problem is to educate the public, something like forcing the cablecos to hand their customers a pamphlet clearly showing what channels do and do not require a box.
CR funding funds programs at their current or planned level, whichever is lowest. Since the old program is not in the authorization, it isn't funded. Since the new program has no appropriation, it also isn't funded. Civilians can be temporarily repurposed while waiting for funds, but contractors will have to fund any employees out of their own pockets. We just got word that here in Huntsville, another 150-250 people will get layoff notices tomorrow, and top of the 500 that have already lost their jobs, meaning that about one-third of Huntsville's Constellation workforce has been laid off.
Above please find a list of people who commented without reading the original source material. Which is the patent itself, not the completely factually incorrect news article. It is not a patent on wireless charging. It's a patent for a specific way of relaying power through a keyboard to a mouse. In other words, a wireless keyboard and mouse where you don't need to change the batteries. Which is them just shooting their own ridiculously expensive rechargable AA battery business in the foot.
"How do I reach them?" Twitter. "Do they know I'm performing nearby next month?" Twitter. "How can I tell them I have a new album coming out?" Twitter.
If your assumption is that only people in the US, the UK, Canada, and Australia speak English, then yes, you can say that only 6% of the world's population speaks English. But your assumption would be very, very wrong. Also, as Javascript is not and never claimed to be a natural language, I don't understand why you think you need to learn English before using it. The definition of "for" in Javascript is so far away from the definition of "for" in English that knowing English doesn't help you grasp how it is used Javascript. Certainly English helps, but if enough documentation exists in another given language, it shouldn't be much harder to learn any given computer language without learning to speak English.
No worries, and the flare fired directly at the Earth on the 12th and the Earth will have undoubtedly found someplace else to be in the meantime.
It's not ObjectiveC, nor Objective C. It is Objective-C. Congrats to the two of you who got that right. The rest of you, please don't code in any C-based languages, your lack of attention to details would be disasterous.
Yeah, I was one of them, only Z-80 before 6502. Difference is with assembly you know you're in the danger zone. C looks safe until you're at the bottom of the pit with bamboo stakes coming through your chest. Also, the scope of what we were writing was much narrower. Pong is easy to code, and so is Space Invaders. The structure is straight forward and fits functional programming well. Hello World on an iPhone is more complicated. It's a whopping one line of code, but you have to understand a lot of concepts right off the bat.
For an 11-year old who's learning, I can't imagine C is a good fit. He'll want to spend his time making working code and not chasing crashes. Something safer.
The characters aren't weird enough.
The camera was used to film Star Wars. Star Wars: Episode IV — A New Hope was made on a computer.
If you believe the data shouldn't be destroyed, have your contracting office send the government contracting officer letter requesting the requirement be deffered until the end of the new contract.
Programmers are not cool. App developers are cool.
Man, you're really bad at snark.
I agree, your post is ignorant. You ignorantly assume that only online authentication systems can impose a delay. But in realty, just about all systems, languages, and OS's have an easy to use delay function and that can easily be added just about anywhere, including in an authentication system. In POSIX C, sleep(60000); will do nicely. Encrypting your hash files is supported and not hard, and also sticking it somewhere other than the default location helps, but there is still such a thing as an incompetent sysadmin. If they can get their modified authentication system running in place of mine, I'm pretty sure I've already lost.
How long would it take if the authentification system limited ot to one attempt per hour?
Sorry, browser fart.
How long would it take if the authentification system limited ot to one attempt per hour?
You don't need a bunch of mumbo jumbo to make a brute force attack ineffective, all you need to do is lock the account after x failed login attempts.
Do they give you, you know, like a magazine or video to watch while you pat yourself down?
It's very common among my friends to use a parent's name when tagging children. Am I to be expected to be able to ID all of my friends' kids? Mark needs to come out of Zuckerland an see how people actually use his product.
Whoahohoho there, Booger! Did you just say "British pizza"? I think I threw up a little in my mouth.
Dude, her TV has a digital tuner. She doesn't need the box. Stop fucking being an idiot.
The QAM tuner can get all clear channels. Some places you get more than just networks. I get Braves TV in HD, for example. I also get about 5-10 other SD digital channels (NASA, etc.). But your point is correct for fiber systems. My point is, a lot of people are paying for the box when they don't need to, and until the FCC addresses that, cable viewers will still keep renting the cablecos box. In related news, my cableco is still hit-or-miss then you call and ask for CableCARD, even though they've been using them for more than 3 years. One rep I called had never heard of them, the next knew they had the dual-channel version and that they charged $5 for them ($2 each for the single channel).
The barrier isn't technological, it's psychological. My mom has a cable box she doesn't need. The installer told her she needed to get cable. I told her to take it back and demand a refund. She won't. During the 80's, you had to have a box to get channels above 13, because that was the highest a TV could tune. Then the FCC mandated cable-ready TV's, and you didn't need a box at all except for pay TV. There was no education or information given to the public, so a lot of people went through the 90's still believing they need a box, and the cablecos still play on that. The only was to solve the problem is to educate the public, something like forcing the cablecos to hand their customers a pamphlet clearly showing what channels do and do not require a box.
I'm no genius so I'm just spittin' into the wind here, but I would probably start off with not buying products that don't match my needs?
CR funding funds programs at their current or planned level, whichever is lowest. Since the old program is not in the authorization, it isn't funded. Since the new program has no appropriation, it also isn't funded. Civilians can be temporarily repurposed while waiting for funds, but contractors will have to fund any employees out of their own pockets. We just got word that here in Huntsville, another 150-250 people will get layoff notices tomorrow, and top of the 500 that have already lost their jobs, meaning that about one-third of Huntsville's Constellation workforce has been laid off.
http://blog.al.com/breaking/2010/09/more_huntsville_layoffs_loom_a.html