Slashdot Mirror


Online Banking Trojan Stole Money From Belgians

hankwang writes "Belgian authorities uncovered an international network of online banking fraud (Google translation; Dutch original), which has been going on since 2007. The fraud targeted customers of several major banks, which used supposedly secure two-factor systems that require the customer to generate authorization codes from transaction information (random code and amount or recipient's account number) that is manually keyed into a cryptographic device (Flash demo from one of the banks; manufacturer's website). Trojan horses that were planted onto the victims' computers would generate a fake error message and request that the victim re-enter the authorization code. This way, amounts up to €4,000 were transferred to money mules and thence to Eastern Europe. The worrying part is that many cases were never reported to the police, because the bank preferred to refund the money to the victim rather than risking its reputation. The extent of this type of fraud is unknown." The article mentions in passing that similar crimes are occurring in Germany and Sweden.

144 comments

  1. sweden??? by lordholm · · Score: 5, Informative

    The article does not even mention the word Sweden or Zweden. It does however mention Denmark, which is not equal to Sweden.

    --
    "Civis Europaeus sum!"
    1. Re:sweden??? by MadKeithV · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, but why NOT Sweden, it has some lovely lakes?

  2. People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Regardless of the effort or complexity, every security system has one inherent flaw.

    1. Re:People by smallfries · · Score: 2, Informative

      The article doesn't say that the trojan was written for Windows either. Are you under the mistaken belief that there are no trojans out there for OSX or Linux?

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
    2. Re:People by abigsmurf · · Score: 1

      There's no reason why a trojan like this couldn't be installed on Linux or OSX. You don't even need admin rights to install something that could log their key presses.

    3. Re:People by vtcodger · · Score: 0

      Of course you can write a trojan -- or any other sort of malware -- targeted at Unix. Unix has the same architecture and pretty much the same vulnerable technologies as NT based Windows. But so far, few people have bothered. But for the time being, security through obscurity -- plus the difficulty of writing low level code that works reliably with seventy or so different Unix distributions -- protects Unix users.

      That won't last of course.

      Prediction: First we'll see malware targeting Ubuntu. Then malware targeting all Unixes. Then malware that has Unix, MacOS and Unix versions all tidily packaged together.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    4. Re:People by speculatrix · · Score: 2, Informative

      Unix has the same architecture and pretty much the same vulnerable technologies as NT based Windows.

      WTF? sure, they both run on computers (usually x86) but there's fundamental differences in everything from the kernel to the drivers!

    5. Re:People by should_be_linear · · Score: 1

      There is fundamental cultural difference in way people are installing apps on both platforms. I am taking here Ubuntu as representative for Unix/Linux world, because it is. On Ubuntu BFU installs app by selecting it in verified repository. On Windows, BFU search web for various utilities and then starts downloading from any web that contain what apears to be install files.

      --
      839*929
    6. Re:People by smallfries · · Score: 1

      You seem to be lagging behind in your predictions somewhat. There have already been several stories this year about OSX trojans being discovered in the wild. This was the first hit on Google just now, there are many others.

      OS-X has much bigger market-share than any of the linux distros so it makes sense it would be the first target. Once more of these are established I would expect more linux distros to be targeted, and then finally the emergence of unix-wide trojans.

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
    7. Re:People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >There's no reason why a trojan like this couldn't be installed on Linux or OSX. You don't even need admin rights to install something that >could log their key presses.
      All files I download to my Ubuntu box are saved non-executable by default. Please give an example of how this could be overcome to operate just like a Windows trojan installation.

    8. Re:People by obdulio1950 · · Score: 1

      Unix has a very different way of handling executable files than Windows. In Windows, the extension is what makes a file executable. In Unix the x permission makes an executable. Since files are created without x permission by default, the user has to explicitly give this permission in order to execute the file. In Windows, execution is automatic.

      --
      PEÃ'AROL: SerÃs eterno como el tiempo y floreceras en cada primavera
  3. So sorry by jplopez · · Score: 0

    Poor Mr. Belgians :-(

  4. Pay attention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This should still be impossible if The user pays attention. The user could be tricked to re-enter the amount or the recipients account number repeated times. But for the attack to be successful, the victim has to be tricked into entering the attackers account number at some point. Before, the login procedure could be hijacked (since it required challenge of a random number) but these days that should be a recognizable number, for example starting with a specific digit.

    1. Re:Pay attention by MadKeithV · · Score: 2, Informative
      I use the system mentioned in the article, and I've never noticed the log-in random challenge to have any recognizable number, nor do I recall any communication from my bank (Dexia) that this is so. If this is actually the case, it wasn't made clear to users.

      Potentially even more worrying is that this system is now also being applied to online payments using my Dexia VISA card, which is more vulnerable still because it originates at the merchant's site, and isn't always so easy to verify.

    2. Re:Pay attention by StoneOldman79 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Entering some extra recognizable info in the 2-way factor authentication is indeed "the way to go".
      Account number is not that user friendly (and which number to enter if you have multiple transfers in one go?)
      My current online bank requires me to type in the amount of money to transfer as an extra fail-safe.
      This should be "good enough" for the near future.
      Sadly, many online banks do not have anything like this. Not implementing proper security and paying to "robbed" customers is apparently still the cheapest option.

    3. Re:Pay attention by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This should still be impossible if The user pays attention

      Well, you cannot expect the user to take this responsibility of "checking for a specific digit", they'll go to the competition if the procedure is too "complex". Why is Apple booming? Not because of feature-gallore.

      You cannot imagine how many emails I get of "regular users" who entered their login details on some random webpage resulting in a email to all contacts in a format "follow this link to see [facebook-style test results]" to be prompted to login with your credentials and continue the chain.
      (I've given up on educating and sending a reply explaining how their credentials have been comprimised").

      And why wouldn't those people?

      It is simular as Microsofts' passport or the facebook implementation on webpages which is pushed everywhere as a "ease of use" and "seemlessly integration everywhere". (which, if with malicious intent, could hijack your accounts as well and get to your emails, banking details or get creative and infect someone)

      --
      I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
    4. Re:Pay attention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Each (new) account number should be challenged.

      Like I said earlier, the biggest problem was the login challenge, but using a fixed prefix (not shared with any account numbers) is enough to avoid the login from being used to get the correct response from the attackers account number. I don't think this news is about a technical weakness but rather about customers using a system they haven't quite understood.

    5. Re:Pay attention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      My bank simply states during the login that the login challenge number always starts with the digit 9.

      Unless I don't pay attention to that I could be on a fake site displayed by a trojan that challenges an attackers account number. There is no peactical way to prevent that. The system is "safe enough" even with ignorant users, and really safe with attentive users. It has worked for 15 years without big problems. To put things in perspective, ATM fraud and card skimming probably steals more money every minute than this type of attack does in a year.

    6. Re:Pay attention by Sabriel · · Score: 1

      "the victim has to be tricked into entering the attackers account number at some point"

      If a trojan has control of your browser, what it sends to the bank doesn't have to be what you typed into the account field...

    7. Re:Pay attention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My bank simply states during the login that the login challenge number always starts with the digit 9.

      With the Vasco Digipass system, login is without a challenge code; the Digipass generates a login code from an internal clock, combined with PIN number and a secret stored on the personal bank card.

      I have noticed that the login code usually (always?) starts with the same digit, but I don't see how this could make the job harder for the attacker. He wants access to YOUR bank account, not to his own bank account, isn't it? (I always assumed that the first digits identify the Digipass device, in case the user has several digipasses with different internal clock drifts).

    8. Re:Pay attention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After working in a certain company for some time, I have to say I can't blame those users anymore.
      A lot of companies ask you all the time for your Windows user/password for all kinds of intranet sites, but some of those intranet sites are not obviously on the intranet.
      Honestly, they usually mess up so thoroughly that's it's impossible for a user to know whether it is ok to enter their username and password (unless it is something really obvious), and since they have a job to do they just think "f*ck those idiots, I'll just enter it, and if it's compromised it's IT's problem for not coming up with a proper solution".

    9. Re:Pay attention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      If a trojan has control of your browser, what it sends to the bank doesn't have to be what you typed into the account field...

      No, the user types the recipient's bank account number into his Digipass device in order to generate an authentication code.

      During a legitimate transaction, the website will tell you

      Enter the challenge code 138427, then the amount in euro 5600, then the recipient bank account number 98765432 into your card reader and enter the authorization code in the field below.

      However, a trojan could transform that into:

      The authorization code was incorrect. For extra security, enter the the following three challenge codes 138427, 5600, and 98765432 into your card reader and enter the authorization code in the field below.

      My bank only asks a single challenge code for small transactions; only for larger transactions (1000 euro and up), the extra codes show up. A victim may not have encountered the triple challenge codes often enough to realize that they must indicate the amount and the account number.

    10. Re:Pay attention by Mattpw · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is the problem with putting complicated user action into the transaction authentication process, if you control the browser you can request the user do just about anything in the name of a test or error as related in the article. My Passwindow method encodes the transaction information (ie destination account) into the challenge from the server so the user must only visually check the information, because this information is cycled alongside the authentication digits they are forced to inspect it and cannot simply ignore it and blindly authorize the transaction.

    11. Re:Pay attention by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      If the device requires only the last digit of the account number, you need a total of 10 money mules to capture money from all infected people.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    12. Re:Pay attention by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      An amount of money is not good enough, because the attacker just needs to see what amount you want to transfer and steal that amount for himself.

    13. Re:Pay attention by emj · · Score: 1

      Each (new) account number should be challenged.

      There are devices that ask you questions like: "Do you want to transfer 100 Crowns to the account of Emj", they just cost a lot more (like $10 more?). Your scheme is already being used on most devices I've seen, but users don't understand that they even miss that they are not using and encrypted connection.

    14. Re:Pay attention by houghi · · Score: 1

      From what I understand, the virus acts like a sort of proxyserver. You are chalanged to enter the Vasco code. Then it takes that code (as there is a timelimit on it or can be used only once) and uses it to transfer money in the background to another account.

      Then the bank system will ask to retype your code, because it can't use the other code anymore. Always pretty random numbers.

      I work on Linux (so no virus there) and I have misstyped the code more then once, so such an error message is not uncommon.

      It is sort of an automated Man-in-the-Midlle attack.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    15. Re:Pay attention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds really poorly designed. If you always challenge account numbers, then how would the system be vulnerable? Only the trivial "please enter this number to resync your device" would then be a possible exploit. Again: if the challenge/response scheme is good (never random numbers, always account numbers for transactions) then there is no way a Trojan could proxy anything. The account number I enter into my device is printed in paper on the bill I'm paying!

  5. Not unique to Belgium by arivanov · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There is a similar scam doing the rounds in the UK targeting nationwide which uses a rather predictable 2-factor (the amount of money and last digits of destination account are used as a challenge).

    The scam apparently asks you to "resync" your challenge device. If you do you end up sending a sum of money to a money mule.

    --
    Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
    http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    1. Re:Not unique to Belgium by Mattpw · · Score: 1

      Do you have a link to any articles?

    2. Re:Not unique to Belgium by arivanov · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, but Nationwide has been using nagware banners that tell the customers that they NEVER ask them to resync the device for a few months now. From there on to deduce what the scam is is fairly trivial. Even if the scam was not around when they started the hint contained in the warning is sufficient for anyone clued up enough to design the relevant trojan by now.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    3. Re:Not unique to Belgium by AlexiaDeath · · Score: 1

      Around here banks have limited the transactions for such "two factor" signing schemes to near nothing in favor of RSA based digital signing schemes that require you to use a pass-coded certificate on a chip card, that is also your national ID card, or a certificate on your cellphone SIM linked to the ID-card one.

    4. Re:Not unique to Belgium by js_sebastian · · Score: 1

      Around here banks have limited the transactions for such "two factor" signing schemes to near nothing in favor of RSA based digital signing schemes that require you to use a pass-coded certificate on a chip card, that is also your national ID card, or a certificate on your cellphone SIM linked to the ID-card one.

      So? That doesn't solve the problem. You still have to enter the amount and destination account number onto an external device which then does the signing.. otherwise how can you be sure what you are signing, if your PC is compromised and anything on your screen could come from attackers?

      And, you have to be educated to what the numbers you enter mean, so that you cannot be scammed into sending money to someone else.

    5. Re:Not unique to Belgium by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      And, does it work with Linux? In my country they want to do the same thing, but I'm not going to play along if I require to run Windows or Mac OS X.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    6. Re:Not unique to Belgium by Rich0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Agreed. I'd envision the secure "credit card" of the future having the following mechanism of operation:

      1. You interface the card with a computer (via USB, acoustic modem for phone, one-wire, etc).
      2. The remote party sends the card a packet with who is to be payed (in the form of a bank certificate), and how much, and whether any kind of recurring transaction is authorized (with details on that if applicable).
      3. The card displays the transaction info on a display built into the card.
      4. The user approves the transaction by hitting an approve button and typing in a PIN using a keypad on the card.
      5. The card generates a certificate and sends it back to the remote party.
      6. The remote party confirms successful receipt of the certificate to the card.

      The remote party and the card communicate by SSL (using bank-signed certificates), so no MITM, although the algorithm should be fairly invulnerable to MITM anyway.

      If there is a transmission error the remote party just asks for a retransmission any time until step 6. The card and the bank would both spot likely duplications. You couldn't spoof the merchant name (Gooogle Innc) or anything like that since it comes via a bank certificate. Nothing is trusted outside the card itself, so no risk of trojans/etc.

      All it needs is a credit card with a battery, display, keypad, and small CPU optimized for crypto. I can't imagine that these are more expensive to produce than the cost of bank fraud.

      You could even have cards that function as digital wallets, handling multiple banks, government IDs, etc. All it takes are some standards, and the right CAs for the right data items.

    7. Re:Not unique to Belgium by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      uses a rather predictable 2-factor (the amount of money and last digits of destination account are used as a challenge).

      What's the second factor?

    8. Re:Not unique to Belgium by AlexiaDeath · · Score: 1

      The cellphone part is system agnostic. Works anywhere, but it costs a small monthly fee. The smart card part is also system agnostic, it sucks everywhere. In theory it works in Linux, windows and Mac OS. In practice, the signing part works in Linux only if you are really lucky and your bank is not an asshat, ID part works quite well however. In windows it only works stably and sanely with IE6. Never got tit to behave with IE 7 or 8. In all fairness there is work twoards updated software that should improve the supported OS/browser range and be somewhat saner.

    9. Re:Not unique to Belgium by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      Basically, the system forces you to have a cellphone. I already think that's a bad idea. My dad bought a smart-card reader, I tried it on Linux. It gets recognised, but after that, I have no idea how to go on after that.

      At work, I got confronted with a mess called "Isabel 6"... Windows only, IE-only and a bitch to get installed on anything but XP. (Only tried Vista, but you need to jump through hoops)

      So, I expect a system that is system agnostic, doesn't require any subscription (cellphone is out) and works. Unless that is the case, I'm not interested.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    10. Re:Not unique to Belgium by AlexiaDeath · · Score: 1

      It aims to be all of these things. Its just not quite there yet because the whole thing involves integrating different browsers on several platforms with actual hardware and times do move on, hence the push for new software that is going to be opensource. It actually works fine with Firefox on windows to my surprise. Once you find a setup that works, its easy to use and and safe. My father, who is turning 70 next year, uses it daily.

    11. Re:Not unique to Belgium by AlexiaDeath · · Score: 1

      Oh, and requires is a bit srtongly said. The option to use a cellphone is fairly recent.

  6. How long until..... by CastrTroy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How long until we move to using dedicated terminals to access our online banking. A device that only did banking could be really cheap. Load a custom, hardened version of Linux on there, that only displayed a web browser, and only went to the bank's website, and you'd probably go a long way to stopping this, and many other kinds of fraud.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    1. Re:How long until..... by phantomfive · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sounds like an excellent plan. One you can implement personally for yourself right now (I personally discourage all my family members from doing online banking from a windows computer). You can have your own personal terminal at your house that you use to connect to the bank. If you think it is an idea people will like, you can start a business setting up similar terminals for other people.

      As for you question, how long: banks will not start sending out terminals to all their clients until the cost of paying for fraud becomes higher than the cost of sending out terminals. Individual users will not start using them until the cost of not using them becomes great enough to overcome the laziness and annoyance of acquiring/using a separate terminal. If banks continue to pay them off like they did in this case, it is not likely to happen.

      --
      Qxe4
    2. Re:How long until..... by Zocalo · · Score: 1

      Why would you need a dedicated device? You could quite easily do the same thing using a bootable, non-writable memory USB stick, and even combine the same device with a one time pin generator if you wanted to have a few extra security bells and whistles. I doubt we'd see such a device for any other platforms apart from those that are x86 compatible though, and even then it's not going to help against MitM attacks, DNS poisoning or any of the other attack vectors that don't target the end user's system, but at least it would be a start.

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    3. Re:How long until..... by Mattpw · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Banks wont run the IT tech support required, and theres also the liability issues. Even if you could guarantee the software had no security bugs the user can just as easily fall victim to phishing type scams and then sue the bank, this is essentially the same problem with the bootable linux LiveCD concept which does guarantee no trojans getting into it but fails to prevent simple phishing. The tech support for all the different drivers and other things a person might use the terminal for would kill the bank. The other problem is banking rarely happens in a vacum, a user wants their account program, their files etc and so locked devices become good for security demonstrations but impractical in real life.

    4. Re:How long until..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You can't prevent DOS type attacks, but you can prevent man-in-the-middle attacks (or at least make them useless) by strong end-to-end encryption. However, the encryption key would not be safe it it was on an USB stick... unless the USB stick in turn is encrypted with a password that the user must enter. Ok, that would work. Unless the attacker patches the BIOS to insert a keylogger or something.

    5. Re:How long until..... by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      Actually what you are more likely to see is more people switching from the web to dedicated smartphone apps published by the banks and officially blessed by the smartphone manufacturer(apple,google,rim etc). Not perfect but closer to a standalone terminal and much more likely to see widespread adoption.

    6. Re:How long until..... by SharpFang · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There is a system that is currently (AFAIK) uncrackable. Details of the transaction you sign are sent back to you through SMS with authorization code. So you know the transaction has been hijacked if the SMS contains wrong data. The code is one-use, generated by bank upon submitting the transaction for authorization.

      (of course this may still fall victim to people not reading the SMS beyond the auth code...)

      I guess it could be hackable if the attackers could hijack the owner's phone (make a clone of the SIM card?) and learn the password at the same time.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    7. Re:How long until..... by laron · · Score: 1

      The next best thing would be a dedicated live-CD for online banking. There is Bankix http://www.heise.de/ct/projekte/Sicheres-Online-Banking-mit-Bankix-284099.html, but afaik only in German.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master."
    8. Re:How long until..... by Mattpw · · Score: 1

      The simple way they get around the SMS without just putting a trojan on the phone like they do with a terminal is to just phone up the telecommunications company and say please transfer all my calls to xxx number, the girl asks what is your birthday (you google it) and the crime is done. The telecommunication companies cant increase the difficulties of authenticating users because of anti competition legislation which some used to lock in customers.

    9. Re:How long until..... by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      Nope, the girl asks what is your phone account management code. This is how it works with all operators in my country. If it's a birthsday in your country, it's completely retarded.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    10. Re:How long until..... by knarf · · Score: 1

      A device that only did banking could be really cheap

      Will the bank also charge $54 for 'shipping'?

      Don't fall for these eBay scam prices. They advertise low low prices with exorbitant 'shipping' charges to a) fool you into thinking this is a really good deal and b) pay lower eBay fees (which are based on a percentage of the purchase price, not the 'shipping' fees).

      --
      --frank[at]unternet.org
    11. Re:How long until..... by Mattpw · · Score: 1

      If this is the case in your country I would just ring you up (or get an autodialer like they do with this scam in USA) and say "Hi im from (telecom company) we have some important information about your account but first I need to confirm your phone account management code". Actually I read about another version of the scam where the trojan would detect when the transaction was done and then they would would just ring up the number and say, "hi im from bank and we need to confirm a transaction you just did" Ive also read from Polish researchers that in the GSM protocol there is a kill last SMS command you can send out, so in this case rather than ringing anyone up you send this sms through and remotely delete the confirmation codes.

    12. Re:How long until..... by Lexical_Scope · · Score: 1

      Surely an even better idea would be some kind of read-only VMWare Appliance (or similar). User clicks a link on their desktop which launches a program that checks the VMWare image hasn't been tampered with (CRC and md5 or something like) and then boots a basic Linux VM which opens a kiosk-mode browser that goes straight to your online banking. Couple that with a proper two-factor hardware token and that should be good enough for most things. If the VM/Browser had draconian checks on things like SSL certificates and DNSSEC, that would be even better.

      There would probably be some possibility of an attack at the Hypervisor level I guess, but you'd still have the other forms of protection as well.

    13. Re:How long until..... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      The "ebay-low" price is probably a scam(or just a link to something that is early in its bidding lifecycle/not going to hit reserve this round); but the real world cash-and-go price for those horrid little WinCE based 'netbooks' is $80-$100. Not quite as rosy as 24.99; but still fairly cheap and falling.

    14. Re:How long until..... by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      1) Please send it to my mailing address. I have requested over and again that I do NOT consent to ANY telemarketing.
      2) Well, please do. I just performed it. I can give you the number I just used (it's been used up and it can only confirm that particular transaction anyway). I don't really see them being able to obtain anything of use to them.
      3) So they can DoS the transaction by cancelling the codes I receive. They still don't get me to sign transactions they want to perform.

      The possible scenario for hijack in this case could be: my PC is compromised, and they control the SMS transmission.
      * I enter transaction details, and click "send".
      * The trojan hijacks the POST content and replaces account number and value with their own,
      * The trojan notifies the hacked SMS gateway with both real and fake details of the transaction.
      * The gateway intercepts the incoming SMS (with wrong transaction details and a valid code to authorize the illegal transaction)
      * it then cancels the SMS from the bank before I get to read it.
      * it sends out their own SMS containing the "correct" transaction details (the ones I have entered) and auth code for the fraudulent transaction.
      * the trojan displays confirmation page with the bank's reply (mule's account#) replaced with details I have entered.

      That's a lot of steps to perform. And there's reading out someone's SMS, injecting some SMS with spoofed caller's number, and associating a hijacked computer's IP with owner's phone number too.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    15. Re:How long until..... by js_sebastian · · Score: 1

      Surely an even better idea would be some kind of read-only VMWare Appliance (or similar). User clicks a link on their desktop which launches a program that checks the VMWare image hasn't been tampered with (CRC and md5 or something like) and then boots a basic Linux VM which opens a kiosk-mode browser that goes straight to your online banking. Couple that with a proper two-factor hardware token and that should be good enough for most things.

      When you click the link on the desktop, how do you know it is really booting the kiosk-mode image, and not just pretending to? This is not a solution, you would need some kind of trusted boot process, and a reboot. Honestly a little cheap, offline device with a key in it and a little screen and keypad for entering the transaction to sign (or at least a screen to display the transaction) seems simpler and safer.

    16. Re:How long until..... by js_sebastian · · Score: 1

      This has happened in a spear phishing case in south africa. A woman went to the cell phone provider's shop pretending to be the man's wife and that he had lost the SIM-card, and managed to convince them to give her a replacement SIM-card, which was then used to receive the authorization code.

      And of course a legal battle started over liability between the bank and phone provider (not sure how or if it ended). Sure, the phone provider should not have given the SIM-card out, but does it follow that they are liable for fraudulent banking transactions? I wouldn't think so, otherwise the banks would basically be externalizing the costs of their security to the cell phone providers. Still, the cell-phone-based 2 factor is pretty good. My main practical worry with that is that, in cases where I don't have a sheet of paper with the target account number, I cannot easily verify that the account I am sending money to is the one I intended (unless I trust what is written on my screen),

    17. Re:How long until..... by arivanov · · Score: 1

      Rebooting the machine to do just banking? Joe Average User is not going to do that.

      Also, what exactly makes you sure that you have booted your USB stick directly and not in a VM? The technique of loading a hypervisor first before loading the supposedly hardened machine has already been demonstrated a while back. A small hypervisor + control software is the ultimate super-trojan. Works with Windows, works with Linux works with anything. It is not that difficult to implement either. Each drive has reserved space to store it and as it is "emulating" the drive it can be 100% stealthy for the OS.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    18. Re:How long until..... by emj · · Score: 1

      dedicated smartphone apps [..] blessed by the smartphone manufacturer(apple,google,rim etc).

      There goes software freedom, there is no room for user created software on a phone that is used to identify you to your bank.

    19. Re:How long until..... by hankwang · · Score: 1

      There is a system that is currently (AFAIK) uncrackable. Details of the transaction you sign are sent back to you through SMS with authorization code.

      In Netherlands, ING uses this system, but for some reason, the SMS includes only the total amount and not the recipient's identity. A trojan could simply wait until you try to transfer a large sum, and then make you sign for the same amount to the money mule.

      Apart from that, if your phone gives you access to your bank account, then you have to treat it as a credit card: never lend it out, always immediately have the SIM card blocked if you lose the phone.

    20. Re:How long until..... by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      Agreed, the amount alone is nowhere near enough. A hijacker can just replace target account number while retaining the amount. This one gives 4 first and 4 last target account number digits, so it's quite impossible this could be hijacked.

      Using SMS to control the bank account requires a separate PIN, different than anything else.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    21. Re:How long until..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think we'll have to wait very long, you just more or less described an ATM machine.

    22. Re: How long until..... by OneAhead · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and to make them extra secure, we could make sure that only bank personnel can service them. You know what? We could build the device into a wall, so that the user only has access to a keyboard and a screen, and everything else is safely located at the other side of the wall, where only bank personnel can go. Yes yes, it would be very expensive to do this at every person's home. But guess what? People are not doing bank stuff all the time, so you could just build one at a central position and have the whole neighborhood share it!

      *runs off to the USPTO*

    23. Re:How long until..... by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      How long until we move to using dedicated terminals to access our online banking. A device that only did banking could be really cheap. Load a custom, hardened version of Linux on there, that only displayed a web browser, and only went to the bank's website, and you'd probably go a long way to stopping this, and many other kinds of fraud.

      You could do it right now. Netbooks are cheap and easy things to get, just install your favorite Linux and you're done. Nota s cheap as your dedicated banking terminal, but you can still do it yourself fairly cheaply and protect yourself, if not your family.

    24. Re:How long until..... by discord5 · · Score: 1

      How long until we move to using dedicated terminals to access our online banking.

      What? You mean like those things you see at a bank?

  7. I wouldnt dream of using a Windows box for banking by miffo.swe · · Score: 0, Troll

    I personally never use a Windows computer for banking. I always use an updated Linux computer when i do anything involving money.

    Windows + Internet Explorer is proven to be unsecure and not fit for anything that demands security. With Linux you can be unsure about security, with Windows you know its very bad and unsecure by design.

    --
    HTTP/1.1 400
  8. Dutch original? by tpgp · · Score: 1

    I'd say if it was Belgium, rather than the Netherlands, then the language in question was Flemish.

    --
    My pics.
    1. Re:Dutch original? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of the Belgian ppl are Flemish, but the official language is still Dutch.
      Flemish is just a bunch of dialects, which are very region dependant. (It changes every 20 - 40 km.)

    2. Re:Dutch original? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd say if it was Belgium, rather than the Netherlands, then the language in question was Flemish.

      Flemish is a dialect on Dutch.

    3. Re:Dutch original? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes the original is in Dutch. In Flanders they speak Dutch.

    4. Re:Dutch original? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flemish is a dialect of Dutch.

    5. Re:Dutch original? by mrvan · · Score: 4, Informative

      Flemish is a dialect of the Dutch language. I know, dialect is generally a political rather than a linguistic term, but:

      - The official languages of Belgium are Dutch and French (and German...), not Flemish and Walloon
      - The written languages are identical (except for some idiom)
      - People can understand each other without effort (except for heavy local dialects, which is the same in most languages)
      - Anecdotally, I think the within-country dialectal differences (e.g. standard Dutch versus Limburgs, Twents; "standard Flemish" vs. West-vlaams etc) are as great as or greater than the between-country differences.

      you should see Dutch and Flemish the way you see British English and American English, minus the spelling differences.

    6. Re:Dutch original? by nstlgc · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Not really. Flemish as a language does not exist - officially it's all Dutch. But don't blame yourself, more than half of the Flemish population is not really aware of this fact. (Full disclosure: I'm from Flanders)

      --
      I'm Rocco. I'm the +5 Funny man.
    7. Re:Dutch original? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, Belgium has three official languages: Dutch, French, and German (the first two account for the bulk of Belgian people). There are three dialect families of Dutch in the Dutch-speaking part of Belgium: Flemish ('Vlaams'), Brabantic ('Brabants'), and Limburgish ('Limburgs'). Sometimes all of these are lumped together under the nomer of 'Flemish', which is not really accurate.

      Anyhow, Flemish is certainly not a different language, and the language you find in written communication, such as the newspaper article in question, is Dutch, not Flemish. There does exist some variation in e.g. vocabulary between the 'Belgian' and the 'Netherlandic' variants, but the original article would be perfectly readable to any Dutchman.

    8. Re:Dutch original? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      <homer>stupid Flanders.</homer>

    9. Re:Dutch original? by rapiddescent · · Score: 1

      - The official languages of Belgium are Dutch and French (and German...), not Flemish and Walloon

      french - but with differences, well 17 for one.

    10. Re:Dutch original? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Learn the meaning of the word dialect. And while you're at it, please also do some research on the history of the Dutch/Flemish(/German) languages. Then post again. PS: I'm Flemish. And I have an interest in languages and their history.

    11. Re:Dutch original? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stupid Flanders

      -- Homer

    12. Re:Dutch original? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      french - but with differences, well 17 for one.

      What the fuck are you talking about?

    13. Re:Dutch original? by OneAhead · · Score: 1

      Your post is most unhelpful; you're claiming it's not a dialect, but you're not explaining why, nor what we should call it instead. Here's an interesting exercise for you: try, in the midsts of a conversation about a more interesting topic, to explain to an average American (with limited knowledge about the world) what Flemish is. In one simple, short and clear sentence, without digressing from the original conversation. Oh yeah, and you're not allowed to use the word "dialect".

    14. Re:Dutch original? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot the most important flemish dialect: Antwoarps!

    15. Re:Dutch original? by theNAM666 · · Score: 1

      Actually, no. It's not that simple. American English and British English is a terrible, terribly deceptive comparison. A working class person who grew up in Gent 60 years ago, cannot necessarily understand someone from Antwerp-- and that's just Flemish/Flaams.

      For that matter, at least 20-30 years ago, a Genterner might have some serious difficulties with what was spoken in the surrounding villages. (Hint: hij, zij, jij are not entirely Genterner).

      There are plenty of arguments that Flaams is a separate language, and, for that matter, that the definition of 'language' is inseparable from politics.

    16. Re:Dutch original? by theNAM666 · · Score: 1

      Bent u Flaaams?

      Belgium is a political entity which may not exist in six months, a fact that has something to do with all of these questions.

      The situation is thus quite more complex, as the cultural and linguistic lines are not quite so easily found-- and because Dutch is a historical imposition and the people whom the Dutch colonized were, after all, speaking their own languages before people showed up and put swords to their throats.

      Equally, the "French speaking majority" (itself a colonized group) was long dominant, and therefore resented by the Dutch-Vlaams-etc speaking portion, (which is roughly why, in the recent elections, a leftish party looking for linguistic and cultural independence from the French-speakers dominated Flanders).

      While a Dutch person would almost certainly be able to read the article, I certainly know plenty of people in their 30s and 40s in Belgium, who didn't pay attention or do well in school, who would have difficulties. Which is sort of my point in writing this. (Rinse wash repeat for Switzerland or parts of German...)

      And so on. I'm throwing out a mish-mash, but it's a complex situation. If you are Belgian, apologies for what will sound like something of a kintergaarden lesson, but I do get annoyed by seeing rather superficial discussions of the situation in English.

    17. Re:Dutch original? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People can understand each other without effort (except for heavy local dialects, which is the same in most languages)

      There is quite some effort involved in understanding someone from Ghent or Bruges if you are not accustomed to the local variant of the language. To prove this, simply turn on the news on one of the Flemish stations and wait for the subtitles when someone from those regions speaks. The difference between the west and east side of Flanders is great enough for it to become a matter of many jokes about the pronunciation of the "g" and "h" or the slower singing like dialects from Limburg. Please note that I'm not referring to dialects here, but Dutch or rather Algemeen Nederlands as pronounced by their local speakers.

      Anecdotally, I think the within-country dialectal differences (e.g. standard Dutch versus Limburgs, Twents; "standard Flemish" vs. West-vlaams etc) are as great as or greater than the between-country differences.

      I concur with this point. I need only travel 15 minutes by car to have different names in the dialect for certain vegetables and drinks, or at least radically different pronunciations (eg. "wohter" --> "wetter" for water). While it is relatively easy to pick up a dialect in a local region, it is not the case when the distances become longer. Some people claim that the Antwerp dialect is probably the easiest to understand, but that illusion ends when you go shopping for certain vegetables in local stores.

      An excellent example of this is perhaps the word "pijpajuin" (Scallion or spring onion), which in the Limburg region alone has at least 5 pronunciations, while in the Brussels region it has a completely different word (Schannulekes).

      From what I've noticed the past few years though is that the Dutch language spoken in the Netherlands and in Flanders both seem to be diverging. The most notable of this is perhaps in popular culture with such bands as "De jeugd van tegenwoordig" in the Netherlands where certain slang is steadily making its way into the spoken language. Various colorful terms also come to mind that are mostly exclusively used in The Netherlands, where usage of those words in Flanders would be frowned upon (eg. the word "kanker" comes to mind, or perhaps the term "swaffelen" is a better example since it was more recently introduced). I should note however that the languages are not diverging in such a radical way that both won't be able to understand each other, it's just that both speakers will sometimes be surprised.

      The very local dialects however are slowly becoming a thing of the past. The world is becoming an increasingly smaller place, and where people were once bound by region (born, raised and died in a region) at college age most teenagers nowadays move to their university town/city where you get a linguistic mashup (for a lack of better term) of the various different accents of Algemeen Nederlands and the various dialect influences. I doubt that the next generation of kids in my region would be able to understand the dialect that my grandmother speaks, much less speak it. Due to the nature of dialects these colorful little languages will most likely die out, or rather evolve into newer variations of Dutch that are less localized than before. My own dialect, which consists of a mix of borrowed words from French and German and words that can be traced back to Diets (Middle Dutch) with many sounds bent, has become practically unspoken over the course of the past 25 years.

      The same thing could be said of the French spoken by the Walloons and the French though. Both have their subtle little differences (for example "nonante" vs "quatre vingts dix", which is the first one that came to mind), and from what I gather the French spoken over the border is recently receiving an influx of slang from popular culture such as french rap music.

    18. Re:Dutch original? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I say we just call it "Miserable Fat Bastard Belgian".

    19. Re:Dutch original? by tpgp · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the clarification - I can't believe quite how wrong I had that.

      --
      My pics.
    20. Re:Dutch original? by PastaLover · · Score: 1

      All those are just dialects of Dutch. The official language of Flanders is Dutch (Algemeen Nederlands) and the version that is used in official communication (i.e. law texts) is not sufficiently different from the Dutch spoken in The Netherlands to call it a different language (which is the point the GP was making). The dialects you're talking about are never spoken between people from different cities (i.e. if someone from Ghent tries to communicate with someone from Antwerp, they'll use the Dutch they were taught in school).

      If you go to England and you speak to people living in different counties, their local dialects might be very different (and you might have a lot of trouble understanding some), but that doesn't mean that the language of England isn't English. We name a country's language from what is the common language, not the individual dialects of that language. The fact that this is even coming up here is one of the deplorable side-effects of having strong nationalistic and xenofobic forces running through Flemish politics. You know the country is pretty cool on its own, you don't have to keep trying to invent new ones in which we're somehow different, let alone better.

      The language is Flemish (in English) or Vlaams (in Dutch) btw. The term makes sense if you want to distinguish between the different pronunciations or the nationality of the speaker, but in all other cases there's no reason not to use Dutch.

  9. Note the fraud dates from 2007 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The fraud dates from 2007, but it didn't go unnoticed for 3 years. The investigation took 3 years to complete because in Belgium the police does its job properly.

    1. Re:Note the fraud dates from 2007 by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Informative
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re:Note the fraud dates from 2007 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, the Dutroux case popped into my head when I read that comment.

  10. Money-Mules by gweihir · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I can at least attest that the search for money-mules is getting more and more aggressive and annoying here. Everybody thinking of making some easy money that way should think again. If the original target goes to the police, the money-mule will have to refund the full amount of money lost and likely will get punished. The reason is that courts typically rule that the fraudulent nature of the job was obvious and hence the money-mule is an accomplice.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    1. Re:Money-Mules by turtleshadow · · Score: 1

      Brian Krebs is the go-to guy for backstory on the mules. Mules have to look "honest" to a banking system so they are really the tech-savy unemployeed being exploited by mafia.

      In a more depressing story the cost of Online fraud is charting to be almost 1B USD in a few years

      Nobody is reporting that this is not being shown on the balance sheets ... where are the Untouchables when we need them.

  11. Really good Flash demo by noidentity · · Score: 3, Funny

    (Flash demo from one of the banks; manufacturer's website). Trojan horses that were planted onto the victims' computers would generate a fake error message and request that the victim re-enter the authorization code.

    That's an excellent Flash demo. For some reason it asked for my account number and password. It's on a safe site so I went ahead and entered it, but it gave some kind of error.

  12. PassWindow could have prevented this by Mattpw · · Score: 1

    My Passwindow method could have prevented this and cost practically nothing to implement too, the transaction verification method employed by the electronic tokens which do the transaction signing as explained in the article have the fatal flaw in that it requires user action for the transaction verification part. ie entering the website generated challenge and then their transaction destination account number etc (a very laborious process for the users). With passwindow the transaction information is encoded into the challenge and the user is forced to recognize it (not merely click an authentication button with some other devices) as it this info such as destination account number is cycled alongside the actual authentication confirmation numbers. Once you put up complicated user action hurdles if the attacker owns the browser it wouldnt be too difficult to simply instruct the user to do as you wish claiming a security test or some such. Honestly with the amount of digits required to be entered into both the device and terminal by the user (up to 40+ on some of the devices) Im not suprised it all turns into a blur of action for many users.

    1. Re:PassWindow could have prevented this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So how do you simulate the air-gap? Remember that the local computer including all drivers etc. are owned by the attacker.

      I still think the physical device that is not connected to the computer seems like the best solution, we just need to have 3 different encryptions on them, 1 for login, 1 for account verification and 1 for sum verification.

    2. Re:PassWindow could have prevented this by hankwang · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My Passwindow method could have prevented this and cost practically nothing to implement too,

      I suppose you mean http://www.passwindow.com/index.html ?

      As far as I can tell, there are two problems with this:

      • A Trojan could intercept enough data to reconstruct the mask. The whitepaper claims that you need to capture between 30 and 1000 transactions. That doesn't account for the fact that the trojan does not need to be 100% sucessful (probably the user can try 3 times).
      • Unlike an embedded EMV chip, the mask is trivial to copy; the owner will not notice that his passwindow card is missing. With a telephoto lens, an attacker could photograph you from a distance while you use an ATM. This means that you still need a password or cryptographic authentication.
    3. Re:PassWindow could have prevented this by Mattpw · · Score: 2, Informative

      There is no simulation, it is a real airgap, the PassWindow is just printed onto an ordinary piece of plastic card just like any barcode. There is no electronics, or software or hardware. The challenge is just an animated gif it works on any device regardless of the situation. The transaction information is encoded into the gif so the trojan only has one avenue of attack which is a long term statistical analysis but we assume every terminal is already compromised like this so we do our own analysis at key generation and determine exactly how many interceptions would be required by the theoretical trojan. With some simple tweaks we can get 10K+ interception rates so it would take decades of normal user interceptions to get enough data to analyse. Of course the server issues a new card to a user if their use rate goes anywhere near the interception rate. In short you end up with semi passive transaction verification so the user cant be tricked into entering in the mule account details because its all done serverside, its also much easier to use, the devices from the article are a major pain and take forever to use.

    4. Re:PassWindow could have prevented this by Mattpw · · Score: 1

      Yes, when the whitepaper was done and PassWindow was initially featured on Slashdot it was a static challenge with several digits in the static challenge, these were interceptable in say 30 interception so a month or 2 worth of normal use. However since then weve had some major breakthroughs beyond just switching to the purely animated cyclical method, weve been able to easily achieve interception rates of 10K plus with very little usability obfuscation. A side benefit of this new method is the analysis doesnt actually give the attacker a clear probablistic determination at say 80% of the necessary number of interceptions, actually its only until the last few interceptions that it all falls into place for the attacker so a guess at 80% isnt knowing 80% of the key pattern. Of course since the whole key process has been pre analyzed its managed and a new card can be issued before it gets anywhere near this number of authentications which might compromise the key pattern. Once you start talking thousands of interceptions required by a normal user even if they authenticate every single day of the year and the attacker is prepared to analyze over a number of years he still wont get anywhere near the numbers required and the average membership card usually only has a few years of life in it anyway. But beyond that the EMV chip doesnt help online based authentication as was shown in the article, its not even helping much of the atm fraud it was desgined for where most ATM's in the world dont even check the EMV chip. The associated CAP readers which use the digital key off an EMV chip for their online authentication use the exact same method of authentication as provided in the article and we can see that has failed.

      re telephoto lens attack etc, you are incorrect, it is not trivial to copy as we simply tint the key pattern, in normal lighting conditions it appears black but screens are quite bright and still allow the user to see quite clearly. This is without even going into transflective laminates etc, really the only way would be with a rubber hose or physical interception and there EMV will fail too. A piece of transparent plastic card costs less than a few cents and so if a bank was really paranoid about their user's waving their credit cards around in public they could easily issue a separate card. A digital version could also be constructed however the costs outweigh the benefits.

  13. As Zaphod would have said by Hozza · · Score: 1

    Oh. Belgium!

  14. Belgian police does not care about online crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I'm from Belgium, i rather big websites and i reported fraud a couple of time, they replied to me with this:

    > We can't keep ourself occupied with 'things like this'.

    So the part about it being unreported might just be "undocumented".

  15. Fancy authentication protocals by david_bandel · · Score: 1

    "The problem with beauty is that it's like being born rich and getting poorer."

  16. We apologise for the fault in the Post by BrightSpark · · Score: 1, Funny

    You failed to mention the wonderful telephøne system and mani interesting furry animals. Those responsible for that post have all been sacked. signed : JUTTE HERMSGERVORDENBROTBORDA http://www.smouse.force9.co.uk/monty.htm

    1. Re:We apologise for the fault in the Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You failed Swedish 101 by using a slashed o.

    2. Re:We apologise for the fault in the Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nej, du misslyckades Mony Python 101 (och att följa länken i den föregående kommentaren).

      (Översättningen: *whooosh*.)

    3. Re:We apologise for the fault in the Post by BrightSpark · · Score: 1

      Marginally better than using a slash dot :-) I was quoting Monty Python who were using pidgin Swedish, plus the website used it that I copied it from.

  17. Re:Sweden Denmark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Are you saying that there is another land outside America? That America is not the one and only inhabited ground on this planet, and that anywhere else there are not just aliens or eventually oil but also other human beings?

    That's impossible. Another lie of those freaky evolutionists.

  18. Re:Sweden Denmark by rve · · Score: 1

    Stop acting so self important about the name of your country in other languages. Do Germans complain that their country is called Germany in English or Allemagne in French instead of Deutschland? Are Russians upset that their capital is called Moscow in English instead of Moskwa? Are Americans upset that you call their country Vereenigde Staaten? No, they couldn't care less. Your collective loathing for / envy towards one of your provinces is your own business, don't expect anyone else to care about it. The English name for your country is Holland, deal with it.

  19. Re:Sweden Denmark by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Pffff, somebody pissed in your cheerios this morning, jeez.
    It is the same when we say America and then you counter that with The United States of America since America is more than North America alone.
    And we technical people like to be technically correct, so the AC is 100% correct.
    Calling the Netherlands Holland only shows ignorance and arrogance, deal with it.

    --
    This is the sig that says NI (again)
  20. I don't know. by ColaMan · · Score: 1

    I'm torn between pity and some sort of vague feeling that justice has been served upon the Belgian public.

    On the one hand, nobody wants to see someone taken advantage of, and on the other, they *do* share a border with the Dutch.

    --

    You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
    There is a lot of hype here.
  21. Names of countries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And telling other people how to use their language is showing arrogance, too. (If two people speaking with each other, both can be arrogant).

  22. you need to understand the derivation by circletimessquare · · Score: 1, Funny

    although true of all the low countries, belgium is yet more cold and clammy and humid than the netherlands. this means people generally have a lot of mucus build up in their airways. so in belgium they speak their dutch with a more gutteral, throaty idiom

    thus, they speak "phlegmish"

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  23. VM? by nten · · Score: 1

    I'm too lazy to think this through, but intuition says running a safe guest inside a compromised host isn't going to protect you. Motherboard firmware is already being tampered with too as another poster pointed out. I really do think a stand alone machine with dedicated hardware, locked down to do that one thing is in order. Final user wouldn't even have root (sounds kinda like an i-anything). I'd not do the read-only thing so that signed security updates can be installed from the creator. Its a weak-point (two really, the update sigs, and the writeability), but I suspect there are enough vulnerabilities still popping up in most OS ('cept VMS maybe), to make it a worthwhile trade. If you can get a VMS browser to open your bank's website read-only might be in order. It would also have an IP (not domain!) whitelist with only your bank's ip's in it.

    --
    refactor the law, its bloated, confusing and unmaintainable.
  24. Bank robbery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The worrying part is that many cases were never reported to the police, because the bank preferred to refund the money to the victim rather than risking its reputation. The extent of this type of fraud is unknown.

    Wow, imagine the Bank did that for an actual good 'ol fashioned bank robbery...

  25. Re:Sweden Denmark by emj · · Score: 1

    Calling the Netherlands Holland only shows ignorance and arrogance, deal with it.

    Most dutch people I've asked don't really care, and in many of the surrounding countries Holland is per definition the same as Netherlands.

  26. Re:Sweden Denmark by rve · · Score: 1

    Pffff, somebody pissed in your cheerios this morning, jeez.
    It is the same when we say America and then you counter that with The United States of America since America is more than North America alone.
    And we technical people like to be technically correct, so the AC is 100% correct.
    Calling the Netherlands Holland only shows ignorance and arrogance, deal with it.

    Well no, the Dutch name is Nederland, not 'The Netherlands'. To be absolutely 100% pedantic, 'The Netherlands' refers to a region, not to a country. There is no basis whatsoever for pouncing on every single mention of the word 'Holland' on the internet and telling English speakers to prefer one word over another in their own language!

    Do English speakers tell you to say 'Wat zeg je?' instead of 'wablief'? The whole concept is ridiculous.

  27. Nice responses to the original article by houghi · · Score: 1

    From top to bottom the responses are:
    * 4.000 EUR is a lot for some people (Get of my lawn)
    * Link to FOSDEM (Free and Open Source Software Developers European Meeting)
    * Mac is more secure (Standard Mac Fanboy)
    * Banks are thieves (Standard non addressing the issue, just namecalling)
    * Make banking more secure (Blaming the banks, not the people who stole it)

    That looks like /. in only 5 postings.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    1. Re:Nice responses to the original article by Mattpw · · Score: 1

      Dont forget me with my PassWindow :)
      *Works on any device irrespective of OS or software.
      *Doesnt matter if a trojan or malware is present on the device, assumes malware is present.
      *Costs practically nothing to implement.
      *Not vulnerable to phone based extensions of the above attack where users are called and socially engineered out of their authentication keys.

    2. Re:Nice responses to the original article by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      *Not vulnerable to phone based extensions of the above attack where users are called and socially engineered out of their authentication keys.

      Most cards say "Property of the bank, must be returned on demand" yadda yadda on the back. That given:

      Dear Bank User,

      As per the Terms of Services* in effect on your account on the date you signed up, we must request your bankcard be returned to the following address for security purposes.

      Please fill out the attached form, including PIN numbers and mail it to the address on the form.

      We apologize for any inconvenience,

      Senior VP, Customer Satisfaction Management
      Shitbank, Anytown, USA

      and the mail it out a billion times. You're gonna catch some fish.

    3. Re:Nice responses to the original article by Mattpw · · Score: 1

      Your right, someone could ask for the person to mail their card and they would also need to include their online username and password but for my liking this is getting too close to a rubber hose attack. It would only take one of the billion people who get such a letter to report the physical address to police and the whole scam goes down and also the attacker must start physically injecting himself into the scam which generally isnt the reason they got into online fraud in the first place.

      Still its an interesting point I have often wondered if you sent out a billion letters just saying Hello, please send me your money. signed Matt what sort of return on inventment you would get.

    4. Re:Nice responses to the original article by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      Late reply, I know.

      When I was young, a carder conned me in to being a mule for a single shipment.

      He had me find an empty house near myself, and post a note on the door. "UPS, I've moved, but I'm still in town. I forgot to update my address with $computer_company and accidentally had my order shipped here. Please put it on the back deck. -$victim."

      I grabbed a box of about a dozen Lite-ON CD-RW drives and reshipped 11 to random addresses. Never heard from that guy again.

      Thank god I was like 13. Looking back, out flew a few grand into the depths of the criminal underground.

      Now, if I were that carder, I've used this 12 year old to grab a few physical cards along with online banking info. I just use others in my preteen army to accept a few tens of grand in charges that I made on my "returned" high-limit credit card, and fence 'em.

      If anyone ever gets caught, it's a kid that can't be prosecuted and doesn't make a great witness in court. And, as the carder, I'm in Ukraine anyway, come find me! The kingpin is /never/ the one the goods/card/drugs/whatever gets shipped to.

    5. Re:Nice responses to the original article by Mattpw · · Score: 1

      Interesting, no doubt there will be more of that type of fraud in the future. So what exactly were in the boxes? fake credit cards? Sorry Im a little confused about the CDRW drives. I work in fraud prevention and after my last post here sure enough I had had a report of exactly what I described. Some African guy in Italy sending out paper letters around the world simply asking for cash. "To the responsible, Honest, humble, handicapped italian man. Financially needy. Open to any proposal, Western union or credit card. Blah Blah.. Thanks.." So yeah they went ahead and did it, cut out all the complexity and just went straight for the money, I guess they did drop in the handicapped angle for sympathy. If I thought I would get a straight answer id almost pay just to know what his ROI is.

  28. Re:Sweden Denmark by dave420 · · Score: 1

    That's embarassing. The Netherlands is the name of the country. Holland is the name of two of its 12 provinces (North Holland & South Holland). So no, comparing it to Germany not being called Deutschland in English is flat-out wrong. It would be like someone calling the US "Carolina", and then insisting that they're right.

  29. Re:Sweden Denmark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but when on vacation in the US, very few people could identify that as a city in the Netherlands. (Let alone realized that "Holland" and "the Netherlands" are - incorrectly - synonymous.)

    Who'd have known I'd defend stereotypical US ignorance, but as a German, I didn't know the distinction between Holland and Netherlands, either. Both names are pretty much used as synonyms around here.

    Anyway, a few Wikipedia articles later I now know the distinction. I'm a bit surprised that Holland isn't actually the name of the country. Then again, I knew what Benelux stands for, so that should have been a clue.

  30. Re:Sweden Denmark by houghi · · Score: 1

    'The Netherlands' refers to a region, not to a country.

    I think you are a bit confused by "the nether lands" The Netherlands" is a country, hence the captital T and N.

    And yes, I would tell an English speaker to first use proper wording. That is if he is willing to learn and I have done so.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  31. Re:Sweden Denmark by houghi · · Score: 1

    Everywhere I go in Europe (Including The Netherlands) The Netherlands and Holland are interchangable.
    Want proof? Hup, Holland. Hup.

    They even market themselves in international faires with Holland, Tulip and wooden shoes, even if the company is from Twente.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  32. typical bank behavior.. by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    This is typical banking behavior when it comes to investigating fraud, they can not really prove THE CLIENT's COMPUTER was at fault...
    so once they see the problem being fraud in another country when the person is still here, they just block the card and refund whatever money they lost, and still the banks are showing all time high profit margins....go figure....make's you wonder just how much they really need to up their services charged for transactions all the time....!

  33. Trojan horses... by Mikey48 · · Score: 1

    "Trojan horses that were planted onto the victims' computers..." and no one noticed the horses? Mike

  34. English article by De+Lemming · · Score: 1

    This is from the news site of one of the mayor Belgian television/radio groups (VRT), they have a selection of articles in English.

    Belgian investigators expose fraud
    http://www.deredactie.be/cm/vrtnieuws.english/news/100724_bank_fraud

  35. Re:Sweden Denmark by rve · · Score: 1

    but when on vacation in the US, very few people could identify that as a city in the Netherlands. (Let alone realized that "Holland" and "the Netherlands" are - incorrectly - synonymous.)

    Who'd have known I'd defend stereotypical US ignorance, but as a German, I didn't know the distinction between Holland and Netherlands, either. Both names are pretty much used as synonyms around here.

    Anyway, a few Wikipedia articles later I now know the distinction. I'm a bit surprised that Holland isn't actually the name of the country. Then again, I knew what Benelux stands for, so that should have been a clue.

    There is no distinction. The poster is trying to elevate a very minor, petty, internal cultural grievance between the south and the north of their country to an issue of international importance.

    The tiresome OP's cliche about the 'stereotypical American ignorance' is the only reason I even replied. How many Europeans can point out Columbus, Ford Worth or Jacksonville, you think? Why would you expect Americans to know much about a city of similar size in on another continent?

  36. Re:Sweden Denmark by HopefulIntern · · Score: 1

    For clarification, "The Netherlands" is the whole country, "Holland" is a region, but often used to denote the whole of The Netherlands. Not to be confused with "nether lands" or any variation as such. "The Netherlands" is an english "translation" of Nederland, just as many other languages translate some placenames, even if they are proper nouns. Examples: Spanish for London is Londres, England is Inglaterra. Norwegian for Russia is "Russland", Belarus is "Hviterussland" (literally "white russia" which is what belarus really means). In English, a German town exists by the name of Cologne (like what you put on after shaving) when the "real" name for the town is Köln.

  37. Battle.net by AkaKaryuu · · Score: 1

    Good to know that the company that makes these authentication keys are also the same as Blizzards and one more reason to opt out of Real ID.

  38. Re:Sweden Denmark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To be absolutely 100% pedantic, 'The Netherlands' refers to a region, not to a country.

    Well, the Netherlands disagrees with you.

    They refer to their country in english as The Kingdom of the Netherlands, and the conventional short form is "the Netherlands".

  39. Already recommended by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Very smart people have already been recommending using a live Linux CD for banking due to the very problem this article addresses (stolen credentials even with a security token).

    http://voices.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2009/10/avoid_windows_malware_bank_on.html
    http://voices.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2009/10/e-banking_on_a_locked_down_pc.html

  40. IE6 by MadGeek007 · · Score: 1

    To make matters worse, the bank demo was using IE6.

    1. Re:IE6 by raind · · Score: 1

      I just worked on a refresh project for a large bank; the build included IE6....yikes.

      --
      Get up!
  41. Micro$oft tax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe is what this is called. (beside the usual can't buy a puter without windoze)

  42. Encrypted demo? by bl8n8r · · Score: 1

    overschrijvingen ondertekenen?
    C'mon, someone please post an un-encrypted version of the flash demo.

    --
    boycott slashdot February 10th - 17th check out: altSlashdot.org
  43. Re:Sweden Denmark by serbanp · · Score: 1

    Interesting discussion. I had no idea that Netherlands and Holland are not the same (even though most of its neighbors are using as that country's name Holland-derived variations) and it's weird that someone would be so anal regarding this difference.

    OTOH, comparing Amsterdam with Columbus OH, Fort Worth TX or Jacksonville (which one? there's at least one in each of AL, AR, FL, GA, IL, IN, MD, MO, NC, NY, OR, PA, TX, VT, WV) based only on population size is really petty. Amsterdam is a city many hundred years old and had the time to accumulate culture, history and plenty of events for which it is known, while the above-mentioned US cities are arguably place names and that's all.

  44. it's likely going on here in the U. S. as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to have a friend that was a webmaster for at least 2 of our local credit unions when he lived in the area, he's since moved away. He was also a member of our local Linux users group. He told us repeatedly that the credit unions he worked for (his in particular, banks in general) found it more "cost effective" to not worry to much about security on customer access portals and just deal with the aftermath when it happens. That's what insurance companies are for. I always thought he was exaggerating, but ...

  45. Re:I wouldnt dream of using a Windows box for bank by miffo.swe · · Score: 1

    Why is this marked troll? Im dead serious in what i say because of my experiences from the last 10 years as a sysadmin.

    --
    HTTP/1.1 400