An iPhone App Store That Apple Doesn't Control
waderoush writes "Princeton's Ed Felten has criticized the iPhone and iPad as Disneyland-like 'walled gardens' and says there's no way the iTunes App Store can 'offer the scope and variety of apps that a less controlled environment can provide.' Now there's a central marketplace where developers can sell iPhone-optimized apps without going through Apple's gatekeepers. Launched today, it's called OpenAppMkt and it's a showcase for mobile Web apps — not just the type seen back in 2007-2008, before the advent of the App Store, but also for new games and other apps developed using HTML5/CSS/JavaScript (in some cases, the same apps compiled and sold as native iPhone apps). Xconomy has a behind-the-scenes interview with OpenAppMkt's creators, who say they're not out to compete with the native App Store, but that developers deserve new ways to reach users."
And I would like to tell you this:
The iPhone App Store never, ever looked so good.
Sudoku. A flip clock. A picture of a watch. I'm so not impressed.
Ed Felten has criticized the iPhone and iPad as Disneyland-like 'walled gardens'...
I like Disneyland. It's a ton of fun. I especially enjoy Bats in the Park. Good fun.
Oh. Wait. You were trying to use Disneyland as a way to imply there was something wrong with it? Oh. My bad. Sorry.
On a serious note, however, I think it's very cool that there's now an app store for the web apps that can run on the iPhone. After all, that is one of the features of the device.
Apple has a web app gallery too.
The difference between now and then is, that web apps have access to most of the sensor data on the phone... so there are a lot more ideas that a practical to do as web apps now than there were before.
But still native apps will always give a developer the performance edge and full access to every nook and cranny of the device.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
I wouldn't want to live there
It breaks my pluginses, my precious!
This means that if your iPhone app is a pile of Perl scripts, you can push it. What iPhone SDK EULA? We don't know what C/C++/Objective-C limitation you're talking about, we'll list your app in our store! If you feel like writing an app for iPhone in C#, you can push it as a .NET exe in PE-COFF format, instead of having to compile it to native code. If you wanted to port Firefox Mobile and have it use it's own JavaScript engine, you can. You could even push a port of Chrome using V8.
I'm pretty sure that none of this is true...
Go to openappmkt.com and click on "Install OpenAppMkt" using an iPad.
Popup sez "To install our app, use the iPhone browser" and offers to text the link to a phone number, same as if attempted on a PC.
Can we get a "-1 Wrong" moderation option?
because some people don't want to go there.
Isn't this what Cydia accomplishes?
The Cydia App Store has also been around for a while, serving the jailbroken iPhone market. Of course there is not a huge number of apps on it, but there are also lots of free apps in the Cydia repository.
Disney should be forced to allow 3rd parties to do anything they want inside Disneyland. If their customers don't want to go into the porn shops, gun shops, brothels, casinos, and check-cashing stores then they can simply avoid those places while walking down Main St.
It's really just a question of freedom.
All walled garden discussions begin and end with this: Internet vs AOL.
The outlands will always become more diverse and desirable than the garden. The garden's residents will therefore always abandon it. It is only a matter of time.
Sure it is. All you have to do is writing a Perl/.NET/whatever interpreter in Javascript.
(+1, Disagree)
The story attempts to suggest that this is a way to get around Apple's walled garden. On the contrary, this is a fully supported system that Apple has promoted many times. They always say there are two ways to develop apps: an open HTML5-based web app method and the curated App store. What's the news here other than showing people the showcase itself?
google ported quake to html5:
http://techcrunch.com/2010/04/01/google-html5-quake/
so to answer your first question: yes.
I'm pretty sure HTML5 can access your camera and mic, although I'm not 100% on that. They can also work when you're offline, using the iPhones built-in caching.
But still, let's not let facts get in the way of a good conspiracy adventure.
But I'd rather have a more controlled environment where, for the most part, the apps have been vetted so they're not trying to steal any info from me. Part of the reason I'm not an Android fan (and no, I don't have an iPhone. Actually, I don't even have a smartphone).
Being open and fancy-free is fine for some things, but for others I'd prefer some measure of security.
Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
is that you've purchased a ticket to Disneyland by purchasing an iPhone, you haven't purchased Disneyland itself.
Considering you paid a few hundred bucks for an iPhone and not a few billion dollars, that seems pretty reasonable.