Slashdot Mirror


Tor Developer Detained At US Border, Pressed On Wikileaks

suraj.sun writes with this news from CNET: "A security researcher involved with the Wikileaks Web site — Jacob Appelbaum, a Seattle-based programmer for the online privacy protection project called Tor — was detained by US agents at the border for three hours and questioned about the controversial whistleblower project as he entered the country on Thursday to attend a hacker conference. He was also approached by two FBI agents at the Defcon conference after his presentation on Saturday afternoon about the Tor Project. Appelbaum, a US citizen, arrived at the Newark, New Jersey, airport from Holland Thursday morning, was taken into a room, frisked and his bag was searched. Officials from the Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the US Army then told him he was not under arrest but was being detained. They asked questions about Wikileaks, asked for his opinions about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and asked where Wikileaks founder Julian Assange is, but he declined to comment without a lawyer present, according to the sources. He was not permitted to make a phone call, they said." Appelbaum told me that he just spoke at length with The New York Times, and quipped that his Defcon talk about Tor was "just fine, until the FBI showed up"; this post will likely be updated with more details. Update: 08/02 03:59 GMT by T : Here's the NYT's coverage.

16 of 637 comments (clear)

  1. Re:UFFSA by Zironic · · Score: 4, Informative

    The general idea as far as I know is that if you suspect someone has performed a crime, but you do not yet have evidence, then you can detain them for a short while as you gather your evidence preventing him from for instance running as you start to search his backpack.

    Police seem to like exploiting their right to detain for frivolous reasons though.

  2. Re:UFFSA by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Informative

    They thought he might be related to a crime (releasing classified documents. Whether you think that should be a crime or not is a different subject). In nearly any country, if the police think you are involved in some crime, they have the power to detain you and ask questions. There is no problem with this: it's what we want our police to be doing, solving crimes. And they do catch real criminals (murderers, etc) at the border. Really, being questioned or detained at a border doesn't make a country fascist.

    The biggest news here is that the government is serious about finding who leaked those documents. For some reason that really annoyed someone high up.

    The biggest problem with what happened is something that wasn't even mentioned in the summary: they kept three of his cell phones for no apparent reason. The article only presents one side of the story, but assuming it is accurate, this is unjust. They shouldn't keep objects without a reason.

    --
    Qxe4
  3. Re:arrested/detained? by volkerdi · · Score: 4, Informative

    The rules are different at the border. Until you pass the border, they can detain you without arresting you, and they can do so on a mere hunch. You aren't "in the United States" yet, and you do not have your constitutional rights until you are.

  4. Re:UFFSA by schnikies79 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Tor was originally developed and funded by the U.S. Navy.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tor_(anonymity_network)

    --
    Gone!
  5. Re:Well, good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    No names were revealed, they were blanked out. Unlike what some "journalist" might have said. Link: http://twitter.com/wikileaks/statuses/20070146579

  6. Re:So what? by 0111+1110 · · Score: 4, Informative

    How often do you travel? I've been pulled aside lots of times and really interrogated. Lots of personal questions: what do I do for a living, why am I traveling to or returning from country x, what do my relatives do for a living, where do they live, and much more. The extensive follow up questions would be even more personal and intrusive. On occasion the questions lasted for more than an hour. I also get chosen for a "random" search nearly every time. Maybe I just look suspicious. I am ghostly white and none of my family comes from the middle east or Southwest Asia. So it is not racial profiling. I can only imagine what it must be like for a foreigner. We don't exactly put our best foot forward at our borders. Much of the world already regards us as vicious, brutish thugs. Or at least our government. It always seems to happen on departure. Maybe because they know they have you over a barrel. They can easily interrogate you long enough to make you miss your flight. On one occasion they only released me just in time. I made the flight, but with only minutes to spare. In fact, it was only when I showed them my ticket and told them that I was about to miss my flight that they finally released me.

    --
    Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
  7. Re:Well, good by Khyber · · Score: 3, Informative

    "A large number of Afghan informants had their names exposed "

    Did you even actually read the documents? Names were blacked out.

    Jesus christ.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  8. Re:arrested/detained? by bl968 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually you can be detained and searched up to 100 Miles from the Border.... It's the Constitution free zone... Roughly 2/3rd of the US population (197.4 million people) live within 100 miles of the US land and coastal borders.

    --
    "GET / HTTP/1.0" 200 51230 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; Setec Astronomy)"
  9. Re:Opinions are a crime now? by commodore64_love · · Score: 3, Informative

    There's nothing to be gain from talking to ANY officer. Name, drivers license, and that's it. (And if you're driving, you don't even need to show an drivers license. "My name is ____," will comply with the law. When I was pulled over by the Homeland Gestapo while traveling across the country, they tried to get me to talk but I refused.

    "Why won't you let us search your trunk?"
    "You said you don't have a search warrant."
    "What do you got in there?"
    "....."
    "Where are you headed?"
    "....."
    "Where did you come from?"
    "....."

    They then made me stand in the hot afternoon sun for an hour, but I refused to comply. Eventually they let me go when they realized they had no other option.

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
  10. Re:of course by rhook · · Score: 3, Informative

    Since he wasn't under arrest he had no right to a phone call. Last time I checked, US Customs didn't need a reason to detain anyone crossing the border.

  11. Re:of course by Hatta · · Score: 4, Informative

    Funny, I don't see an "except for the border" clause in the Bill of Rights.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  12. Re:of course by Abreu · · Score: 4, Informative

    He would have been disappeared in a jail somewhere in Poland or Romania

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extraordinary_rendition_by_the_United_States

    --
    No sig for the moment.
  13. Re:Well, good by Luckyo · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just no. There is no link anywhere to non-sanitized version. Leaked docs that are posted on wikileaks are sanitized. Taleban is doing what it was doing since 1970s - scaring the shit out of informants though any means necessary, which includes lying. I'm sorry, but you're clueless.

  14. Re:Opinions are a crime now? by Erikderzweite · · Score: 4, Informative

    Terrorist attacks happened in Spain, March 11, 2004. That's EU. No "patriot" acts so far. Spain also has a long story of terrorist attacks in Basque province.

  15. Re:of course by arashi+no+garou · · Score: 3, Informative

    Keep in mind it's not the "one phone call" that you are entitled to as a detained or arrested individual. Take it from someone who worked as a booking officer early in life: Cops are only *required* to let you phone someone if you specifically say you want to call your lawyer. Anyone else -- Mom, Dad, best friend, etc. -- is entirely up to how gracious the detaining officers are.

    Speaking of unlawful detainment, didn't you know there is no such thing anymore, at least if the federal government is the entity detaining you? Georgie Bush wiped his ass with the Due Process and Habeas Corpus parts of the law, remember?

  16. Re:Well, good by antibryce · · Score: 3, Informative

    uh, there are names in the wikileaks postings. Several news outlets, including the Washington Post, have searched the released docs and found names that weren't redacted:

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/29/AR2010072904900.html

    wikileaks didn't scrub the docs thoroughly, even the founder of wikileaks is basically saying "hey, not our problem!" He's not denying it, I find it interesting you are.