Slashdot Mirror


HP CEO Resigns During Sexual Harassment Investigation

A number of readers are letting us know that HP CEO Mark Hurd just resigned over sexual harassment accusations. The company's board has appointed CFO Cathie Lesjak as interim CEO. A contractor had accused Hurd of sexual harassment, and the board brought in outside counsel to investigate. While the harassment claim could not be substantiated, the investigation did uncover other misconduct. Hurd's "close personal relationship" with the contractor created a conflict of interest, and he was also found to have misused company assets. In a statement, Hurd said, "As the investigation progressed, I realized there were instances in which I did not live up to the standards and principles of trust, respect and integrity that I have espoused at HP and which have guided me throughout my career."

34 of 233 comments (clear)

  1. Wasn't he the CEO during the pretexting scandal? by rsborg · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sounds like a classy guy, but sadly I'm guessing this is par for the course at this level of "leadership" in most companies.

    --
    Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
  2. "realized"? by Lost+Race · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He "realized there were instances" of misconduct on his part? More like he realized he'd been caught.

    1. Re:"realized"? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 4, Funny

      He "realized there were instances" of misconduct on his part? More like he realized he'd been caught.

      "Realized" means, his lawyers told him, "You're fucked."

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    2. Re:"realized"? by jd · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That, and the rest of the board probably deciding that they had to get rid of him to avoid exposing any of them to investigations.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    3. Re:"realized"? by suomynonAyletamitlU · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm going to play devil's advocate, keep in mind it may not work.

      I find when I look at people who are given a lot of power don't tend to view "misuses" of power the same way as people do when looking at it from the outside. A lot of different kinds of corruption can be born from, "What's the harm?" and it can be very easy to run away from the consequences and by doing so, lie to themselves.

      In cases like that, when you are forced and/or given an excuse to stop lying to yourself, you actually learn a lot about yourself and your behavior that you may not have known, but which you should have. It's actually rather easy to 'misfile' things in your head such that you actually do know them, but they're not properly weighted or not connected to other facts, for (a made up) example, "I hired my cousin in place of a qualified applicant, as a favor." Okay, you hired your cousin--did you check to see that he was doing a good job? Did the company suffer because you didn't look into his behavior? Did the company actually need that qualified applicant? Was the qualified applicant already working there (internal promotion) and have they gotten the shit end of the stick because of it? Was the qualified applicant, perchance, someone you actually knew and respected and who hasn't talked to you since?

      Once you stop hiding from your own closet and its skeletons, you may in fact get hit by the realization that you aren't nearly as clean as you thought you were. That's all I'm saying.

  3. Re:Wasn't he the CEO during the pretexting scandal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "As the investigation progressed, I realized there were instances in which I did not live up to the standards and principles..."

    Thank goodness there was an investigation, so he could realize what he had done!

  4. Re:Wasn't he the CEO during the pretexting scandal by dan828 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    More like, at some point in the investigation he realized that he was busted and couldn't cover up or plausibly deny things. He was probably feeling pretty untouchable up to that point after coming out unscathed from the other little upset they had a while back.

  5. Crap floats. by Spazntwich · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Anyone else's skin crawl as they read the rehearsed and empty words? Reeks of a sociopath saying what he thinks folks want to hear to let him off the hook. Funny how many seem to make it to the top.

    1. Re:Crap floats. by mapcan · · Score: 5, Funny

      He thought harass was two words

    2. Re:Crap floats. by bertoelcon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Anyone else's skin crawl as they read the rehearsed and empty words? Reeks of a sociopath saying what he thinks folks want to hear to let him off the hook. Funny how many seem to make it to the top.

      Only the sociopaths want the power so only the sociopaths get the power.

      --
      Anything can be found funny, from a certain point of view.
    3. Re:Crap floats. by jd · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Criminal psychologst calls CEOs psychopaths
      Sociologist/Criminologist calls CEOs sociopaths

      Take your pick. Or maybe they're both. It would explain a lot.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    4. Re:Crap floats. by Hatta · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I follow the news. I'm pretty immune at this point to rehearsed and empty words from sociopaths.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    5. Re:Crap floats. by Raenex · · Score: 5, Funny

      You only say these things because of your repressive mother.

    6. Re:Crap floats. by jd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'd refine that to "they're not hard sciences - yet". There's a dispute that's older than me (by a long way) as to whether soft/social sciences and social sciences are sciences at all and I won't get into that. What I will say is that there is absolutely nothing in any physical science which strictly prohibits any of the soft/social sciences becoming hard sciences eventually. That anyone knows with any certainty.

      I will add this proviso: "The Emperor's New Mind" by Roger Penrose would seem to imply that psychology can never be a hard science, since it does claim that the brain is a quantum computer which is irreducible to a deterministic model. That's not quite enough, since QM is perfectly good physics and yet not reducible to a deterministic model, but the brain is hellishly complex and if we can't model even trivial macroscale systems using QM we certainly won't be able to model something as convoluted as the human brain. We might not need to model it to quite that degree to be able to derive laws that are as good in the social disciplines as Newtonian mechanics is in the physical sciences, which would probably be good enough to qualify as a hard science, but we'd not be able to go beyond that point if Penrose is right.

      However, as things stand, you are absolutely correct. The soft sciences (whether or not they really are science) often do not use the scientific method and frequently are more opinion-based than anything. In short, not merely pre-modern-science but pre-Socratic. It shouldn't take more than 2,500 years for them to catch up, though. Less, if they put in the fundamental research necessary.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    7. Re:Crap floats. by sjames · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not that they're the only people who want to be highly paid no matter how well or poorly they do, they're just the only ones who are able and willing to stab enough people in the back and stomp on enough puppies over the years to get there.

      Most people would feel too much personal shame to lay off half the workforce "to save the company" and then collect more than their cumulative incomes as a bonus.

  6. Re:Wasn't he the CEO during the pretexting scandal by OzPeter · · Score: 5, Interesting

    but sadly I'm guessing this is par for the course at this level of "leadership" in most companies.

    Yeah but HP also had Carly who was forced to resign. Hopefully trouble doesn't come in 3's for HP.

    **Sniff** I remember when HP was a well respected company and its equipment was built like a tank

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  7. Re:Wasn't he the CEO during the pretexting scandal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    While it pains me to defend this piece of shit, the truth is that the pretexting was the handiwork of Patricia Dunn (chairwoman of HP board at the time), and the Hurd wasn't involved.

  8. This is good news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now that the Hurd is abandonware, will HP contribute the source back tot he community?

    I've been waiting for Gnu to deliver the Hurd for the last 20 years, and this might be enough to get them over the hump.

  9. I'd like to say "Unbeliveable", but I can't by sirwired · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I find it hilarious/scary that whenever a CxO gets caught doing something stupid/criminal, the defense is always ignorance. These weasels who get paid more in a day than I get paid in a year suddenly become the most oblivious, ignorant, and stupid morons in the world when they are being investigated for wrongdoing.

    It wasn't until the middle of the investigation that he realized he did something wrong? *retch*

    Possible scenario:
    He hires a mistress / "marketing" contractor.
    Takes her on "fact-finding trips" in a company jet.
    Dumps her / stops paying.
    She sues for "harassment."
    Board figures out the real story and lets him "resign"... in the meantime, they quietly pay off the mistress in return for her not filing suit. (Once you've gone public and filed suit with a high-profile case like this, you've just pissed away your best bargaining chips, which involve sweeping under the rug.)

    If I was HP's board, I would not have let him resign; he would have been fired on the spot. Although I admit to being surprised that they didn't ham-handedly cover up the story; perhaps they learned their lesson with the wiretap fiasco from several years ago.

    SirWired

    1. Re:I'd like to say "Unbeliveable", but I can't by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 5, Interesting

      If I was HP's board, I would not have let him resign; he would have been fired on the spot.

      That's because you aren't his neighbor, don't sit on the boards of any other corps with him, don't drink and play golf with him on a regular basis and don't have your own contract mistresses too.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  10. Some are more equal than others by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Had this been a "rank and file" employee, the said employee would've been escorted out of the building on the same day, no severance. Instead we get this loop that's just going to go lay low for a few months then move on and pull the same shit again, till caught... (rinse and repeat.)

    --
    ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
  11. Re:What info do we have on his... by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 4, Funny

    One made from 100 dollar bills and wet with the tears of laid off employees and their families. It's probably monogrammed with his initials too.

  12. Re:Resigned? Yeah right! He got his ass fired! by HarvardAce · · Score: 5, Informative

    I wonder what kind of golden parachute the board paid to make him go away quietly?

    According to CNN, he could make $53 million in severance pay.

    --
    Note to self: Stop putting jokes in my insightful comments so I can get something other than +1 Funny!
  13. SBC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Posting this anonymously since I work for HP.
    Seems Mark violated the Standarts of Business Conduct (SBC). Every new employee has to study the SBC and every year these is a mandatory training on understanding this document. It kind of discredits both the SBC and the trainings if the CEO breaks his own rules.

    Oh, and I hope they will find a new CEO who actually understands how technology works. Mark was not much better than Carly - HP now hardly does any serious R&D (except for HP Labs which actually does pretty cool stuff), preferring to buy established companies.

  14. Re:Wasn't he the CEO during the pretexting scandal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    As an employee of HP, good riddance. The company's employees have been treated like dirt for at least the past two years. I don't think there is one person who sits within 50 feet of me who isn't actively job hunting. Sexual harassment is just one of his many offenses.

  15. In Las Vegas by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In Las Vegas, that type of contractor is called an "escort."

    --
    ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
  16. Re:What info do we have on his... by SDF-7 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    $40 to $50 million by current estimates: http://www.businessinsider.com/hp-severance-2010-8.

    Part of me wonders if it was actually in his contract that even on being fired for ethical/criminal reasons [i.e. not just fired because "we don't think you're pumping the stock quite enough"] he gets a severance or if the board just wants this over with / is such pals with him / whatnot that they gave it to him anyway. If the former is true -- the hiring committees really need to make better contracts (and stop being packed with the friends of the folks they're hiring... but I suppose that's what happens when boards keep cross-pollinating as they do).

  17. He used company funds for his fling by sirwired · · Score: 4, Insightful

    He can have a consensual relationship all he wants, (I never recall a CEO getting fired over an affair) but HP found him using company funds for this relationship. That crosses the line into misconduct worthy of firing. It's perfectly legal to have a mistress, and not something a CEO is going to get fired over. But he should have paid for the whole fling out of his own pocket; too many CEOs treat the company treasury as their piggy bank. As if their outsize salaries aren't big enough already...

    And apologizing to the managers and employees would be appropriate here; nothing steams employees more than executives only paying lip service to a company's "values." The non-apology wasn't worth the paper it was written on. (It wasn't until he was investigated that it dawned on him it was wrong? *blech*)

    It wasn't harassment because she probably agreed to the whole deal (likely up until the point he decided to dump her.)

    Oh, and the "no panic" plan doesn't seem to be working. HP is down 10% in after-hours trading. (Which makes sense... an abrupt CEO transition from an executive that by all accounts was doing a good job is going to be tough.)

  18. Re:As a followup... one impressive thing by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I love how "lack of judgment" has become the newest euphemism for "crook". Misappropriating funds, preferential treatment for a contractor (which really is a form of theft too), and instead of being labeled a conniving embezzler, he gets the wooly "profound lack of judgment" crapola.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  19. Re:Wasn't he the CEO during the pretexting scandal by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well Done, Sarcastic Boy!

    Now, off to the Alliteration Mobile!

    Nanananannanana

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  20. Re:Wasn't he the CEO during the pretexting scandal by sexconker · · Score: 4, Funny

    I can't seem to remember ANY employee of a tech company that had anything good to say about the company they work for...

    I just want to preemptively get this in:

    Google is not a tech company - they're an ad agency.

  21. Re:Resigned? Yeah right! He got his ass fired! by Kingrames · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wow, a 53 million dollar reward for sexual harassment, theft, and other misconduct to horrifying to speak aloud. Friends we are in the wrong goddamn industry.

    --
    If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
  22. Re:Resigned? Yeah right! He got his ass fired! by timeOday · · Score: 5, Insightful

    $50e6 probably sounds very reasonable when you're accustomed to making $30e6 every year. It's funny, how small must have his fraudulent expenses been, compared to being paid over $100K every single work day. He probably feels like he just got fired for going home with an HP ballpoint pen in his pocket.

  23. Re:Wasn't he the CEO during the pretexting scandal by rdnetto · · Score: 4, Funny

    **Sniff** I remember when HP was a well respected company and its equipment was built like a tank

    These days, the packaging is built like a tank's.

    --
    Most human behaviour can be explained in terms of identity.