Slashdot Mirror


Researchers Pinpoint Cause of Gluten Allergies

An anonymous reader writes "When patients with celiac disease consume foods containing gluten — a protein present in wheat, barley and rye — their immune systems send out an alarm, triggering a response that can damage their intestines and prevent them from absorbing certain nutrients. Now, scientists have pinpointed the culprits most responsible for this harmful reaction: three small fragments within the gluten protein that spark chaos in the gut."

8 of 177 comments (clear)

  1. Re:double standard by mangu · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Who gets to decide whether you're the problem, or the substance is?

    The percentage of people who are harmed by arsenic (100) vs. the percentage of people who are harmed by gluten (small).

  2. Celiac is not an allergy by beaker8000 · · Score: 4, Informative

    First, this research is great. However I want to point out that celiac disease is not an allergy, it is an autoimmune disorder. Calling celiac an allergy makes people think if they have it they will break out into hives or their face will swell if they eat gluten. This contributes to most with celiac not knowing they have the disease. According to U Chicago's Celiac Disease Center, 97% of those with Celiac are undiagnosed (http://www.celiacdisease.net/assets/pdf/CDCFactSheets%20FactsFigures%20v3.pdf). Examples of symptoms of celiac are fatigue, mental disorders, abdominal pain, joint pain... a full list is here: http://www.celiacdisease.net/assets/pdf/CDCFactSheetsSymptoms2.pdf Also about 1 in 133 americans have celiac, however 41% of adults and 60% of children are asymptomatic.

  3. Re:Here's hoping they can track down peanut allerg by StWaldo · · Score: 5, Informative

    As a celiac'er myself, I can say that's not true. I ate dirt, played in the mud, my mom was not overprotective, and I still got critical anemia from damage to my gut from gluten. Also, as noted below, celiac/gluten intolerance is not an allergy - it's an autoimmune disorder.

  4. Re:Here's hoping they can track down peanut allerg by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You can acquire an allergy via exposure. A good example is powdered latex gloves. The powder, usually corn starch, picks up small amounts of latex protein and rubs it into the pores of your skin. The powder can also get into the air and carry latex into the lungs. As exposure continues, the risk of having a problem rises. This is a large issue for health care workers, and many of them are switching to non-powdered vinyl gloves. ANYONE can get a reaction if they get enough exposure, but it may take 20 years for some people to see an effect. Other people do have a predisposition to develop food or other allergies, there is more information available here.

    --
    You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
  5. Gluten by phorm · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yes, as mentioned, arsenic is a poison because it's deadly to pretty much everyone (though supposedly you can build a tolerance), and additionally it's not exactly common in the stuff we eat (except where we've poisoning land with heavy metal from discarded electronics).

    Gluten, on the other hand, is in pretty much f***'ing everything. Preservatives in canned food, wheat-products, tons of stuff. It also has this tendency to follow family-lines. However, since the full tests usually involve fun things like biopsies, a *lot* of people don't know they have it. However, the numbers of those with gluten-intolerance isn't as small as one might think.

    Maybe it's just IMHO, but I think that trying to eliminate a condition which causes a smaller group of people to not be able to eat 80% of the food out there, vs one where it's just "don't eat poison", might not be such a bad thing. Of course the GP is probably a troll, but a lot of people don't seem to realize how serious celiac'ism is.

    1. Re:Gluten by dgatwood · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In the case of gluten allergies, two reasons:

      • The effect is cumulative and tends not to cause serious problems until well after the start of breeding age.
      • It seldom would be bad enough to kill you anyway.

      Thus, it is neither a significant positive nor negative evolutionary pressure, so the percentage of expression should rise and fall almost randomly through history.

      If you want to know the actual reason for the increase in gluten and peanut allergies lately, we have a pretty good idea:

      • The human body has historically not consumed such large quantities of wheat as we do today, thanks in part to better transportation and storage.
      • In countries that have historically consumed large amounts of wheat (e.g. parts of Europe that consume wheat-based pastas), the varieties of wheat grown in those areas contain significantly less gluten than the red wheat that is popular in the United States (which I think was originally indigenous to Russia).
      • Modern society has gotten so busy that few women breast feed infants as long as they should. As a result, children are exposed to real foods at an earlier time than ever before in the history of the human race. There is evidence that children exposed to gluten, peanuts, etc. too early in life are significantly more likely to develop an allergy to them.

      Nothing evolutionary about it. It's predominantly societal and geographical.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  6. Re:People Forget by DrXym · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Utter bullshit. Coeliacs must avoid "ancient" varieties of wheat such as spelt as much as modern varieties. It has nothing to do with GM foods. If anything GM holds the best hope for a cure by producing a strain of wheat whose gluten protein is modified sufficiently that it doesn't trigger an autoimmune reaction.

  7. Re:Here's hoping they can track down peanut allerg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have Celiac's disease and I'd like to comment on wheat substitutes as I have first-hand experience with many. I will say up front, there really is no substitute for wheat. The combination of taste and texture cannot be matched at any cost. The substitution used depends on many factors, and the alternatives may involve adding 4-5 ingredients to replace the wheat.

    Gluten is what gives wheat it's spongy/elastic texture. If you tried to make bread from rice or potatoes, it will crumble because these starches lack gluten. Any potato or rice bread you buy in the store or bake will invariably include a flour containing gluten(except those specifically designed to be gluten-free). There are really only two options here:
    * Xanthan gum. This is a replacement protein used widely in gluten-free products. It is not cheap nor does it have any flavor.
    * Guar gum. Similar to Xanthan but slightly cheaper and is a laxative.

    Wheat has a certain taste. There is *NO* substitute that compares here as one cannot get wheat without gluten. The appropriate substitution here depends on the application.
    * A common use for wheat flour is dusting so the product doesn't stick. There really isn't anything cheaper then wheat for this application but rice flour is as effective and has a very weak flavor.
    * Breads can use a mix of flours based on tapioca, rice, potato or beans. All of these do not taste like wheat. Beans are a laxative and much more expensive. White rice and potato flour are not as nutritious.

    Some gluten-containing starches have desired chemical properties.
    * Almost all beer is made from barley or wheat and therefore contains gluten.

    Wheat has a good shelf-life.
    * Anything potato or rice based baked good must be refrigerated and even then only lasts about half as long.
    * All the aforementioned flours need to be stored refrigerated whereas wheat flour does not.