Slashdot Mirror


Blackberry Gives India Access To Servers

Meshach writes "As happened earlier in Saudi Arabia Blackberry has reached a deal that allows Indian authorities access to the transmissions of hand held devices. Much of the fear comes from worries about terrorists: Pakistani-based militants used mobile and satellite phones in the 2008 attacks that killed 166 people in Mumbai."

182 comments

  1. How long... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How long before every country decides that in order to allow RIM to operate they need to open up their servers?

    1. Re:How long... by Jazz-Masta · · Score: 5, Funny

      How long before every country decides that in order to allow RIM to operate they need to open up their servers?

      Monday.

    2. Re:How long... by vlueboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This will be pretty interesting in shaping the expansion of future multinational companies: how long until every country decides that your "private" T1 connecting New York to Tokyo needs to pass through traffic sniffing tools so that both countries are sure nobody is using private corporations for terrorist activities? Far fetched? AlQaida is a private corporation on its own way. You just need some sleeper cells properly situated at both ends of the wire inside a fortune 500 company, especially an outsource friendly one. Then, even if Intel has no idea of the crimes being aided by their "private" network, these "super-private" interests can be allowed to harm both countries.

      That said, I do not agree with government spying, but see that even as cellphone communications are important to control, eventually government "greed" will stop at nothing for the sake of national security.

    3. Re:How long... by jbssm · · Score: 1, Troll

      I'ts generally accepted that most of the 1st world countries actually don't need that. USA, Russia, Israel, China, etc, all have the means to decrypt those communications in real time and that's why they never needed to demand access from RIM.

    4. Re:How long... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do know what "first world" means, right? Just a hint: not Russia or China.

    5. Re:How long... by davester666 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Of course, there are only a billion or so trivial ways to privately communicate using a public network, from one-time pads, to stenography [in text, images, video, or other binary files], to using ssh, or https.

      And for all you higher and mightier Americans using IMAP, I'm sure you know the police can request any email, without a warrant, for any email stored on a server for more than 180 days (and now believes that they can also get any email stored on the server for less than 180 days if you've read it) http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/04/emailprivacy/ I wonder if GMail has a portal that lets the police do this or if they just forward all email to the FBI as it passes 180 days...

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    6. Re:How long... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...neither is israel.

      btw you guys, the white teenagers and otherwise virgin hackers who make up the majority of slashdot readers, reek of prejudice. h1b1 anyone??? bo hu hu, the indians are dumb-fucks but mommy they are still stealing our jobs (how much dumb are we for that to happen?).

    7. Re:How long... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Just curious how any government would go about decrypting a 128 bit RSA message in real time? Was there an article proving P == NP while I wasn't paying attention?

    8. Re:How long... by chrb · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How long before every country decides that in order to allow RIM to operate they need to open up their servers?

      The vast majority of countries with cell networks already have laws in place that require cell providers to enable lawful intercept of calls and messages. RIM were an anomaly because they provided no lawful intercept capability to these countries. Now, they do.. RIM devices in the USA and EU are already subject to lawful intercepts - these moves are just providing the same capability to other nations.

    9. Re:How long... by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      A terrorist will just use PGP to encrypt their emails. So will allot of legitimate businesses making it hard to tell friend from foe.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    10. Re:How long... by Runaway1956 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Dude - the Indians aren't stealing our jobs. The fucking government is GIVING AWAY our jobs. Perhaps you're aware that there is a "minimum wage" in the US? Oddly, it has never applied to everyone, equally. Go ahead - see if you can figure out just who is exempt from the law. If there's any "stealing" of jobs happening, it's done by the South Americans. The jobs that the Indians are doing have been GIVEN to them.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    11. Re:How long... by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Uh-huh. Which only goes to show that people who use the cell phone to plot against the government are idiots. There are a lot of more secure methods of communication - some of them right on the internet. Of course, NOTHING is completely immune to being intercepted. It would be a bitch if the government intercepted the keys you sent for your buddy to decrypt all those files hidden in the picture of Obama admiring the Lincoln memorial, LOL

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    12. Re:How long... by Sovetskysoyuz · · Score: 1

      files hidden in the picture of Obama admiring the Lincoln memorial

      What if the reason the Internet is full of porn is actually that all the images are carrying encoded transmissions?

    13. Re:How long... by jon3k · · Score: 1

      "how long until every country decides that your "private" T1 connecting New York to Tokyo needs to pass through traffic sniffing tools so that both countries are sure nobody is using private corporations for terrorist activities?"

      Who cares?

    14. Re:How long... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Symmetric encryption schemes like AES can get away with having short keys like 128 bits, but RSA requires keys in the thousands of bits (like 3000 at least) to provide a semblance of security.

    15. Re:How long... by Drumster · · Score: 1

      I didnt know governments have now started giving away jobs rather than people actually applying for jobs, interviewing for them and getting them based on merit. Americans are weird.

    16. Re:How long... by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Let's think about this. The corporation has a job to be done. They look at the applicants, some of which come from thousands of miles away - India for example. If they hire local people, they have to pay local wages. They don't much like that, so they apply to the government for permits, allowing them to import cheap labor from thousands of miles away. The government may or may not care - but if they actually CARE about their constituents, they can always be bought.

      With every foreigner approved, we have one job GIVEN AWAY to a foreign person, and TAKEN AWAY from a voting, taxpaying US citizen.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    17. Re:How long... by Drumster · · Score: 1

      Are you trying to confuse and mix up Socialist with Capitalist economy? Cause I always thought US was a capitalist economy with market forces governing everything. Corporations want cheap labor, they get it with Indians as employees (who are not just cheap but competent as well). I am confused over your confusion.

    18. Re:How long... by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      The US is not purely capitalist. Did you not read about all those banks that were "to big to fail"?? If we were to allow capitalism to rule, unfettered, those banks would have gone down. Instead, we had a taste of corporate socialism, the government stepped in and "saved" all those failures.

      If things were run purely along capitalistic lines, there would be no Indians here at all. Travel expenses would negate any savings in labor costs.

      Minimum wage laws are another example. They are completely contrary to capitalistic ideals. The government mandates that EVERYONE* (with a few key exemptions) must be paid x amount of dollars per hour, OR MORE.

      If you'll research all the subsidies that the government has given to corporate America, you can only conclude that capitalism is really a failure. Today, it is little more than a catchword, which denotes the people who are really in power.

      *exemptions involve almost everyone involved in growing, producing, processing, harvesting, or storing food and food products - the result of lobbying efforts by corporate agriculture

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    19. Re:How long... by Drumster · · Score: 1

      US switched to socialistic measure ONLY AFTER the recent recession. Many of those measure were quite questionable (not just by me, but many American experts themselves). For years and years US has been purely capitalist - minimum wages is something that was fixed out of a welfare to society attitude - which is present in any kind of an economy. "If things were run purely along capitalistic lines, there would be no Indians here at all. Travel expenses would negate any savings in labor costs." You cant be serious about this! The purchasing power parity (PPP) index between US and India stands at 3.5 as of date. No amount of initial expenses can negate the amount of money Indians can make there. This would really mean employees being ready to sponsor their own travel as well if they would get to work in the US. Fact remains that Americans have become lax and instead of working out their own efficiencies and making themselves competitive, are sitting and waiting for regulatory measures to help them out. Thats the difference between Asians and Americans/Europeans. Asians think whats the most efficient way of going from A to C, but Americans/Europeans say theres no way of going from A to C without doing B - both approaches have their pluses and minuses, but fact remains that Asians currently are the most efficient and hardworking labour-force in the world.

    20. Re:How long... by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Sounds a little like you are beating your own chest there. Much like the Mexicans who are undercutting the American job market. That purchasing power you mention makes it profitable for them to pay 5 or 10 thousand dollars for a coyote to sneak them into the country. They can recoup that payment in months, or at most a couple of years - then continue to live and work here ILLEGALLY for another 20 years. Sure, while they live here, they live below the average American's "standard of living". But, all that money they send home builds a mansion, while supporting dozens of relatives. Any pension they "earn" will make them fabulously wealthy when they retire.

      And, who gets screwed over? American workers of course. Because, corporations are happy to exploit those Mexicans, even if they have to pay off a president so that he won't enforce the laws that he is sworn to uphold.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    21. Re:How long... by Drumster · · Score: 1

      Umm, I am not beating my own chest. I'm sorry if you feel that way. But I am in no way justifying illegal immigration. I am only talking about the current H1-B system and Americans crying hoarse over it. Illegally crossing over the help of coyotes by Mexicans or staying illegally in the country by any Asians is wrong and I dont endorse it. I was only trying to give my side of the argument. The fact remains that the world is global now. People go where there are opportunities. Be it America or be it China or be it India. Its no longer about our people and their people. Its all about being competitive. If you arent competitive enough then I'm sorry my friend, but you will sooner or later be thrown off. India realised this in 1992 when liberalization set in and we started opening up our markets to the world. Well, but this would throw up a completely new debate and the argument would go on forever and ever. As of now I would say I support the governments decision to force RIM to open up their networks :)

    22. Re:How long... by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Fair enough - sorry to have brought illegal aliens into the argument.

      But - the fact remains that Indians coming to the US are being subsidized in part by the US government. http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/72848/H_1B_Is_Just_Another_Gov_t._Subsidy

      And, the fact remains that activists in Washington can afford to promote those special interests who will profit from the program, while ignoring the needs of American workers.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    23. Re:How long... by Drumster · · Score: 1

      Go one step back and try to understand why is the government giving these so-called 'subsidies'. If they dont then corporate America will be up in arms against the government because of their lowered profits. The logic is simple. The world needs a service and the Indian IT companies provide it.

    24. Re:How long... by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      I don't care about corporations being "up in arms". In the United States, the constitution gives the vote (and voice) to citizens. Corporations aren't citizens. Every law maker who represents a corporate interest, rather than citizens interests, is a prostitute. He whores himself to the corporation, rather than legitimately representing his constituents.

      Corporations are happy to exploit people, along with the law.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    25. Re:How long... by Drumster · · Score: 1

      I agree with you on that. But unfortunately I dont see that changing anytime soon. Sad, but true.

    26. Re:How long... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can have information from http://www.specmobi.com/

    27. Re:How long... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes and I'm sure they "lawfully" intercept calls and messages all the time and never do it illegally. (sprinkle sarcasm throughout)

    28. Re:How long... by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      Corporations aren't citizens, but they are merely a collective of citizens, hence a "corporate interest" (which is really the interests of the collective) is technically a citizens interest.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
  2. Story should be titled ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "RIM gives India access to servers"

    Last time I checked, Blackberry was just a mobile device brand name !

    1. Re:Story should be titled ... by plover · · Score: 4, Funny

      How about "Another RIM job for Blackberry Users"?

      --
      John
    2. Re:Story should be titled ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note to self: never read slashdot while eating.

    3. Re:Story should be titled ... by ickleberry · · Score: 1

      For anyone who doesn't know, BlackBerry email service means that all emails go through RIM's servers

  3. Gag order by traindirector · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The better question may be "where has this already happened with a gag order attached to the request?"

    1. Re:Gag order by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'll tell you:

      uA)u2j2la*jh2o(*&seH uj* jj3&m*j3hH

      (and, yes, someone at RIM has just run that thru their indiaFilter() and are laughing at the joke. sorry, I can't explain it to you.)

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    2. Re:Gag order by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      I'd think RIM would be begging for the gag order. lol

  4. Phfft. by kylemonger · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is like banning box cutters on planes because the 9/11 terrorists used them, as if terrorist can't figure out how to enocde their messages in other ways. Terrorism isn't the reasons for this, repression is.

    1. Re:Phfft. by Ziekheid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Terrorism has become the best argument for invading privacy nowadays.

    2. Re:Phfft. by kainosnous · · Score: 1

      That's very true. Terrorists, as any group of people, have many ways of communicating with each other. Some forms of communication are more convenient, but for an evil crime organisation, convenience is not the top priority. As you mentioned with box cutters, banning them didn't make it one bit harder for terrorists to make attempts on planes, but just made it much more troublesome for the many honest airline passengers.

      The governments know this won't do anything for security. Either they are trying to trick the people into thinking that they are doing good (for the votes), or they are actively attempting to limit freedom. Either way, it isn't a good thing.

      --
      There are 10 commandments: 01)Thou shalt love the Lord Thy God 10)Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.Matt22:34-40
    3. Re:Phfft. by sznupi · · Score: 1

      ...box cutters, banning them ... just made it much more troublesome for the many honest airline passengers

      I can't help but wonder - how? (especially "many")

      And you know, India is the biggest democracy around...

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    4. Re:Phfft. by OrangeCatholic · · Score: 2, Informative

      Box cutters and WATER. Oh god I hope I never get a job handing out bottles of water in earthquake ravaged haiti, HOW will I get the water there and how will I open the packaging!?!?!

      Or can you put water in a cargo plane? But wouldn't all that water just blow up even more??

    5. Re:Phfft. by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I can't help but wonder - how? (especially "many")

      Plenty, since the TSA extended the definition of box cutters to include nail clippers, pencils & baby milk.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    6. Re:Phfft. by Yetihehe · · Score: 1

      For me for example. I didn't knew you can't have any tools onboard (not only box cutters) and my pincers got confiscated.

      --
      Extreme Programming - Redundant Array of Inexpensive Developers
    7. Re:Phfft. by zbyg · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Terrorism and pedophiles has become the best argument for invading privacy nowadays.

      FTFY

    8. Re:Phfft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Terrorism, it's the new communism

    9. Re:Phfft. by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      You missed another obvious explanation. The government wants you to BELIEVE that you are beholden to them for your security. Note all the press releases, in which one official or another brags about the measures his agency has taken to protect you. They WANT you to feel dependent on the government.

      You could look at welfare for a similar situation. Welfare has it's place - that is, no one should ever starve in any civilized country. But, today, welfare benefits come pretty close to what the lower middle class makes as a take home wage. Again, the government WANTS you to be dependent. The opinions of the dependent are malleable - or at least more malleable than the opinions of the independent.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    10. Re:Phfft. by Bucc5062 · · Score: 1

      India is a democracy, ah...So all those wonderfully democratic people who get their Blackberry cut off because RIM took a stand and said, "No, we are not going to allow government access to our servers" will rise up and vote leaders out of office?

      Right.

      Governments, even those labeled democratic, have understood that the masses will not really do anything to stop these steps to limit freedoms. RIM's in it for the money, I get that. But had they took a stand (and why now are governments asking for this, RIM been around for a while) in the UAE, SA, and India then perhaps enough people would have not only become active in checking the overreach of government, but it might have driven customers to RIM. They would be known for not bending to government control of legitimate communications.

      This action will not stop bad people from committing bad acts. The best tools for reducing (if not stopping terrorism) is balanced economic growth for all people, the removal of repressive actions that foster hate, and then the practical and open use of law to bring criminals to justice. Blowing up people in a store, on the street is not terrorism, it is just murder. We should treat it as such.

      --
      Life is a great ride, the vehicle doesn't matter
    11. Re:Phfft. by BangaIorean · · Score: 1

      Only one flaw in your excellently written post. Most people in India support this kind of monitoring because most people perceive terrorism as a big threat. Even though there hasn't been a terror attack after November 2008, that Nov 08 attack was so horrendous that the repercussions are still felt. It kind of shook up the nation, and has had the same effect on India as 9/11 had on the USA.

    12. Re:Phfft. by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      you can put the water in a boat. Boats are much more efficient cargo carriers anyway.

      Of course, if that boat full of water should sink on it's way, you can imagine the jokes....

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    13. Re:Phfft. by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      ...box cutters, banning them ... just made it much more troublesome for the many honest airline passengers

      I can't help but wonder - how? (especially "many")

      I used to be able to get to the airport and go through check-in 30 minutes, maybe an hour, before takeoff. But now I wouldn't get there later than 2 hours before. I dehydrate easily and so I always carry a drink with me. Now I can't take my drink on board. I grew up always having a pocket knife guess where? In my pocket. Taking that on board is out now too. Heck, maybe half of the boys in my high school also carried one, and some of the girls. The biggest concern I had growing up was nuclear launches, in school we'd have drills much like fire drills but for nuclear attacks. Now my biggest concern is government.

      Falcon

    14. Re:Phfft. by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      Terrorism and pedophiles and drug dealers have become the best argument for invading privacy nowadays.

      FTFY

      FTFY.

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
  5. Oh, I get it ... by kbahey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Oh, I get it now ...

    If it is Saudi Arabia and the UAE, it is all about censorship ...

    But if it is India, it is a move against the terrorists ...

    It is all about spin ...

    1. Re:Oh, I get it ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      ... India is also 60% Muslim ...

      15%

    2. Re:Oh, I get it ... by BangaIorean · · Score: 2, Informative

      Dude - you have access to Google, Wikipedia, and the whole uncensored internet. it isn't too tough to do some basic research on such well known statistics. The percentage of Muslims in India FYI is 13.6%.

    3. Re:Oh, I get it ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      Nope, just around 13%. And thank god for that. It's bad enough when we have so many Muslim countries such as Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Afghanistan, etc. I shudder to think of what would happen if a behemoth like India were overwhelmingly Muslim. A bunch of terrorists might have nuked NYC by now, and we'd see a lot more Burkhas all over the place!!!!!

    4. Re:Oh, I get it ... by CalcuttaWala · · Score: 1

      and the US already has access to the servers ... so there is no need to worry here

      --
      Insight into much, Influence over nothing !
    5. Re:Oh, I get it ... by slack_prad · · Score: 1

      no ... far from 60. Even if you include Bangladesh.

      --
      Sent from my desktop computer
    6. Re:Oh, I get it ... by BangaIorean · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Go away troll. It's not as if the Hindus, Christians, Buddhists, Atheists etc. have all got themselves castrated after 2001. What you're saying is that the Muslim population of India, which was 130 million in 2001, is now close to 700 million. What the hell - even someone with a minimum amount of common sense would shy away from posting such bullshit.

      And what 'Western part of India' is Muslim? The maximum Muslim population in India is in the Northern state of Uttar Pradesh (and of course Kashmir). I have a feeling you are generating your "statistics" out of a rarely seen orifice

    7. Re:Oh, I get it ... by angelwolf71885 · · Score: 0

      umm the wester part you know the part that used to part of the Persian empire.. you know way back when before WWII when Pakistan and most of India was part of Persia who changed its name to Iran and then split further into the Pakistani region a few years later and then a day later currant India was formed the western half you know next to Pakistan why do you think that Muslims can only be boin and not converts for even as well as those that migrated the Muslim population is growing every ware.. and specially in places like India and Pakistan where the Muslim and non Muslim war is most prevalent besides that its very very possible for the population to have a huge jump in 10 years it only took the US to gain 100 mill in 2 or 3 years you call me a troll most likely because your a Muslim phoebe and hate hearing that the Muslim population is growing by leaps and bounds

    8. Re:Oh, I get it ... by BangaIorean · · Score: 1, Interesting

      As of today, India and Pakistan are separate countries. Iran is a third, totally unrelated country. And no, your shrill cries of 'Islamophobia' are laughable. I wouldn't necessarily "hate hearing of the Indian Muslim population growing by leaps and bounds" as you put it, but I do hate hearing unsubstantiated bullshit like 'India's Muslim population is almost 700 million'. Tommy rot! Like I said earlier, you're talking out of a rarely seen orifice. If you contend that India has 700 million Muslims you need to tell us how you came up with such incredible nonsense - anything to back up your assertions?

  6. Corporate reactions will come... by Tjp($)pjT · · Score: 4, Insightful

    By overtly giving access to these governments they can scan for US or European business partners (hopefully RIM limits to the local to that country traffic). This allows them an unfair competitive advantage as they can then direct local companies often state owned or controlled to change bids or marketing approaches. Saudi Arabia this might apply to leveraging better prices from suppliers or from gaining a better advantage in the financial sector, and in India it means they can now cherry pick information related to manufacturing deals to gain advantage over the people looking for competitive bids between India and other outsource manufacturing (and outsource software development).

    This is not good. Corporations should strongly consider if RIM is a viable solution at this point.

    --
    - Tjp

    I am in wallow with my inner money grubbing capitalistic pig. ... Oink!

    1. Re:Corporate reactions will come... by Ziekheid · · Score: 1

      How about agreements on sharing international banking data, it's far more worrying.

    2. Re:Corporate reactions will come... by sznupi · · Score: 1
      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    3. Re:Corporate reactions will come... by khchung · · Score: 2, Interesting

      By overtly giving access to these governments they can scan for US or European business partners (hopefully RIM limits to the local to that country traffic). This allows them an unfair competitive advantage as they can then direct local companies often state owned or controlled to change bids or marketing approaches.

      Yes, and as we all know, the US and Europe (incl UK) governments are such bastion of moral behavior that they had never and would never ever use data collected through immoral means (e.g. spying, wire-tapping, etc) to assist their own businesses.

      A more cynical person (who might have read about such abuses by various western governments in the past) would more likely to think that by gaining such access, these governments would simply be "leveling the playing field" rather than gaining any "unfair advantage".

      --
      Oliver.
  7. Sounds like a lost cause... by bogaboga · · Score: 1

    Indians and those who think like them must think folks bent to do bad things (read harm society), are fools. To defeat any kind of snooping, all bad people have to do is to communicate in code.

    That is: "Let's have dinner tonight." to mean "The materials will arrive next week Tuesday."

    Now defeat that.

    1. Re:Sounds like a lost cause... by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2, Insightful

      anyone truly needing encryption will manage their own layered end-to-end solution or have someone competant handle that for them.

      the rest of us will be denied our privacy and the government will come off looking like its 'tough on crime'.

      oh, and a private corporation gets to keep a huge marketshare and shit on its customers. or maybe its customers' customers.

      ie, business as usual.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    2. Re:Sounds like a lost cause... by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      The real deal is the number, who has the number, what was sent and any new numbers connected. The days of pre or post conference Soviet limo chatter are over. But the friends of friends of people of interest are so worth the effort. Welcome to CryptoAG in your hand :)

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    3. Re:Sounds like a lost cause... by westlake · · Score: 1

      To defeat any kind of snooping, all bad people have to do is to communicate in code.
      That is: "Let's have dinner tonight." to mean "The materials will arrive next week Tuesday."


      The first problem is the code book.

      There are only so many words and phrases you can keep in your head before you have to write them down.

      The second is weaving the key words and phrases into a message that doesn't come across as stilted and unnatural - or worse.

      "Let's have dinner tonight" implies an intimacy that can be easily tested.

      The Thrifty Spy on the Sixth Avenue El


      The most frustrated man in New York at 4 P.M. Saturday, July 24, 1915, was a very proper German lawyer named Heinrich Friedrich Albert who stood helplessly in the middle of Sixth Avenue at Fifty-second Street, watching a streetcar glide uptown with his briefcase and the details of the $40,000,000 spy, propaganda, and sabotage ring he operated. Dr. Albert...had saved a taxi fare of perhaps $1.25.

       

  8. Excuse for corporate espionage, really by Gopal.V · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I know RIM is only providing meta-data on the content, but honestly, are you telling me that this *wont* be used to spy on a corporate competitor?

    India is corrupt in a very "Who me?" way. This law has only abuses, in a country where you can buy a SIM for 5 dollars, with a photocopy of just about anybody's id. The terrorists don't need to bother with the BB or anything even remotely expensive - the underworld maybe (The D Company), but not the "kill them all and let God sort them out" category of terrorists.

    But it's not like India is the first place to do this. Echelon was used similarly, I guess to spy on foreign firms.

    1. Re:Excuse for corporate espionage, really by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2, Funny

      I guess to spy on foreign firms.

      my eyes must be going. at fist, I read it as foreign films and I'm thinking, hmmm, is there some DRM angle to this? maybe something about region codes?

      yes, I must get new glasses soon.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    2. Re:Excuse for corporate espionage, really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fac ut vivas

    3. Re:Excuse for corporate espionage, really by digitalchinky · · Score: 1

      >>> Echelon was used similarly, I guess to spy on foreign firms.

      Although I am nobody special, just some text on a screen for you, as a disgruntled ex-secret 3 letter agency worker drone formerly living in Australia, I can confirm that your musings never happened on my watch for a decade or so very late last century. I only wanted to know if UFO's existed anyway - I even managed to mention this during my interview. Indeed I was as surprised as anyone when they said "Okay, you can work for us, here's a box of cornflakes, your TS security clearance is in the bottom somewhere" - I'm quite sure the Navy still have a copy of my passing interest for things unidentified in their psych evaluation - as does the Defence Security Branch and the DSD :-)

      (Alien feeding duty sucked, the buggers bite)

    4. Re:Excuse for corporate espionage, really by BangaIorean · · Score: 1

      Yahbut - there is absolutely nothing one can do against "kill them all and let God sort them out" type of terrorists a.k.a. suicide bombers. That's a totally different discussion.

    5. Re:Excuse for corporate espionage, really by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      if you had stayed longer, they would have given you the approved plasma-resistant gloves out of the box of post toasties (maybe that's changed, not sure, myself). the post toasties only comes after 15 years of service, though.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  9. Lesser evil? by cestmoa · · Score: 2, Informative

    I somewhat can understand the concern of law enforcement that a secure mail environement makes their job more difficult. On the other hand, giving access to the RIM infrastructure implies that you are no longer innocent until proven otherwise, but you are now suspect until your innocence is proven. BAD

    While Internet Service and PIN2PIN messages seem to be encrypted with the same key for everybody, RIM always claimed that enterprise mail is encrypted with a unique key end to end from the enterprise server to the device and that nobody else has this key, specially not RIM. Enterprise mail solution is crypted with AES 256bit, so if this is true, your corporate mail should still be safe. And if you don't trust this, use S/MIME or PGP or don't use mobile corporate mail at all.

    Anyway, this step does not increase the customer trust in the RIM solution, I really hope for a clear statement from RIM on this purpose.

    1. Re:Lesser evil? by flyingfsck · · Score: 0, Troll

      "RIM always claimed that enterprise mail is encrypted with a unique key end to end from the enterprise server to the device and that nobody else has this key" ...and you believed that?

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    2. Re:Lesser evil? by cestmoa · · Score: 1

      Yes, to me it is believable. Reasons:
      1) RIM uses AES, an open standard for which it is proven, that no master key exists
      2) To generate the keys on the device and server, RIM uses SPEKE, an open standard to generate keys without ever transmitting it.
      3) The moment RIM has the keys and this is getting public knowledge (and something like this would get out), the business model of RIM is dead

  10. Other modes of communication by ricky1962 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They can always go back to using number stations on the shortwave bands. Just a thought.

    1. Re:Other modes of communication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My 802.11g adapter can't pick up radio stations, you insensitive clod!

    2. Re:Other modes of communication by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Dump the WIFI-g, dude. You're obsolete. You want WIFI-n. Oh - wait - they've already done that, haven't they? Crap, let's go with WIFI-y. I think it has a nice ring to it! ;^)

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  11. A very bad privacy bet in RIM's side by GPLHost-Thomas · · Score: 1

    Instead of complying with evils requirements, RIM could have well say "thanks but no thanks", thus doing a lot of advertising on how secure they were, and how strong their privacy concern was. This would have had a tremendous marketing effect. We would have all think about RIM as a very good company.

    Now, we all know that RIM's network is full of spy watching us. The fact that appart from these spies, the network WAS to be considered very safe doesn't add up. We 100% know now, that somebody is listening.

    They might have succeeded in keeping their market up and running in India and other Arabs countries, but now myself and many others well understand that we wont ever be able to trust a blackberry again. I really think this will hurt RIM in the long run. At least I wont forget, and will continue using OTR on open platforms like the n900.

    1. Re:A very bad privacy bet in RIM's side by Sovetskysoyuz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or they could have realized that access to a market with over fifteen percent of the world's population would let them rake in more cash than the additional sales from demonstrating security. Most people with Blackberries want a smartphone, not Fort Knox.

  12. The United States by KingSkippus · · Score: 4, Informative

    Can you believe the unmitigated nerve of those crappy little backwards countries and their oppressive Big Brother-ish monitoring of their citizens!!? Thank god nothing like this could ever happen in the United States, where we actually give a rat's ass about protecting our privacy from the government!

    Oh, wait... Well, shit.

    1. Re:The United States by mustPushCart · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Ignoring the 'crappy, little and backwards' part of your post, i'd like you to know that monitoring of mobile phone services in a country like India is one of the very few ways to actually fix a littttle problem that we have. The attacks in Mumbai in December were pretty devastating, we are regularly hit by terrorists off and on (when was the last half decent terrorist hit in the US? 2001?) so your comparison is unwarranted. What you should remember is that the taped conversations and their handlers who were sitting pretty in a neighboring country were one of the most important pieces of evidence against them (the handlers and the country housing them). If it was not for those, the case would have been much weaker. Maybe you live in a safer country than India, but I for one would gladly give up a part of my privacy if it helps the authorities nab the fanatics who perpetrate these acts. Some sacrifices are just worth it, even if your government misuses them. PS: India's independence day in 3 hours from this post.

    2. Re:The United States by bhagwad · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm an Indian. And I don't think the loss of privacy is worth the few lives that terrorism takes. The chance of me dying in a terrorist attack is lower than me being struck by lightning. To answer your post, there are some sacrifices that are worth it. And this is one.

    3. Re:The United States by bhagwad · · Score: 1

      I don't. I'm against it. Read my reply carefully.

    4. Re:The United States by jon3k · · Score: 1

      "He who would trade liberty for some temporary security, deserves neither liberty nor security." - Benjamin Franklin

      It starts with tapping your phones. Where does it stop?

    5. Re:The United States by KingSkippus · · Score: 1

      I think you misunderstood my point.

      Here in the United States, we see stories like this and think (mainly because it's the reaction the media is eliciting), "What a godforsaken narrow-minded place!" when in fact, our own government is doing much worse to us.

      My point was twofold. First, people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. Second, to try to help bring a little awareness to the abuses of our own government. It really wasn't mean as a judgment on India or Saudi Arabia, it could have been any country/countries.

    6. Re:The United States by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moron, i think you dont know one thing homeland security and other US agencies has sophisticated equipment to monitor Blackberry and similar phones and thats why they don't need RIM permission. You guys are so naive and think that US government is respecting your privacy. :D

    7. Re:The United States by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      Except this will not stop terrorists or other determined individuals from encrypting their communications. The rise of programmable smart phones, such as the iPhones, numerous Android devices and others makes government eavesdropping on blackberry messages a moot point. How difficult will it be for software to be written that uses the data capabilities of these phones to send and receive encrypted messages that do not employ any centralized control or management? I submit to you that it would not be very difficult at all. In fact, measures like this will only harm the average citizen, by removing his privacy, while not thwarting or even seriously hindering the terrorists or indeed any other determined individuals. In short, it will NOT save lives; you will be giving up your privacy in return for nothing.

    8. Re:The United States by mustPushCart · · Score: 1

      Why do you think its called 'Terrorism' and not 'mass killing'. The key point is just that, Terror. I too am aware of the the extremely low chance of dying in a terrorist attack. But the objective of terrorism is not to kill people, its to create panic, hysteria and generally bad things to a country/people. You are already paying for terrorism. Your tax payer money is going into it, you feel depression when you think of the attacks, lots of money going into security, investigation and diplomacy, there is a drop in tourism because of it, the stock market dips a bit, you feel a slight tinge of fear when you step into a train or a bus. The people who actually die in a terrorist attack aren't that important, neither are the people who are on the ground shooting/hijacking/blowing things up. The handlers and the people who fund and harbor them are. Now to each his own in the whole privacy thing. Since you are an Indian you would know how important the 26/11 tapes to build up a case against those who apparently sent those terrorists. There are worse things that can happen than losing a bit of your privacy to a government you cant trust. Just like having to show ID before using a cyber cafe in India, I personally believe that its a small price to pay. (Terrorists use random pre determined message boards to communicate, not email, so this is something of a deterrent)

    9. Re:The United States by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am also an Indian and think you are really an idiot for making such a statement. Bet your perspective will change in a heartbeat, literally, if someone in your family was part of a sacrifice.

    10. Re:The United States by mustPushCart · · Score: 1

      Ah fair enough. My point was there they are two different situations so they cant be compared directly. Maybe we need it more than you do.

    11. Re:The United States by Clandestine_Blaze · · Score: 1

      Ah, good old appeal to emotion. Works like a charm, every time.

      Person 1: "I support the death penalty"
      Person 2: "You wouldn't support it if your child was put on death row!!"

      Person 1: "I am against the death penalty"
      Person 2: "You wouldn't be against it if the murderer had killed your child!!"

    12. Re:The United States by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm an Indian. And I don't think the loss of privacy is worth the few lives that terrorism takes. The chance of me dying in a terrorist attack is lower than me being struck by lightning. To answer your post, there are some sacrifices that are worth it. And this is one.

      I am also an Indian, and I dont even like the current Govt.

      But I support the move to open up RIMs servers, given that there may be a chance to save my poor, backwards, fat ass from terrorists, as I am not a politician with my own security detail.

      Simply put, this was a huge security risk.

    13. Re:The United States by bhagwad · · Score: 1

      There are worse things that can happen than losing a bit of your privacy to a government you cant trust.

      And what reason do I have to trust the government here?

    14. Re:The United States by bhagwad · · Score: 1

      You would think this, but since you have no idea about me, this is sheer speculation on your part.

  13. RIM had a very different tune Thursday by Tony+Lechner · · Score: 0
    Funny, I read this quote from a RIM public statement in an article this morning

    No changes to the security architecture for BlackBerry Enterprise Server customers since, contrary to any rumors, the security architecture is the same around the world and RIM truly has no ability to provide its customers’ encryption keys. Also driving RIM’s position is the fact that strong encryption is a fundamental commercial requirement for any country to attract and maintain international business anyway and similarly strong encryption is currently used pervasively in traditional VPNs on both wired and wireless networks in order to protect corporate and government communications.

    Source: http://www.securityweek.com/rim-statement-india-demands-access-messaging-services-no-ability-provide-its-customers%E2%80%99-encryption-k

    I took this as "fuck off, but I guess they got a wizard to, in some way, hand governments unencrypted data without decrypting it?

    *sigh*

    1. Re:RIM had a very different tune Thursday by troll8901 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think there's a difference in the encryption levels for emails (BlackBerry Enterprise Server) vs instant messaging (BlackBerry Messenger).

      At least, according to the video link provided by AC, way below: http://www.ndtv.com/news/videos/video_player.php?id=157644

      So what happens is, RIM provides the decryption codes for instant messaging. The emails, however, cannot be decrypted, since RIM does not have the codes - they're stored locally on BlackBerry Enterprise Servers, which are set up locally within company premises.

      Or so the story goes.

  14. Fuck you RIM by Local+ID10T · · Score: 1

    I understand its just business, and $ win, but you have lost a customer.

    Keep it up, and I hope you go bankrupt.

    --
    "You want to know how to help your kids? Leave them the fuck alone." -George Carlin
    1. Re:Fuck you RIM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      So instead you will go to one of the companies that India/Saudi Arabia did not have to threaten to get the data they wanted? ie the ones they did not have any trouble cracking?

    2. Re:Fuck you RIM by troll8901 · · Score: 1

      Yes. That's because "no news is good news". Therefore, the others must be superior to RIM/Blackberry.

  15. Watch: How BlackBerry encrypts its emails (India) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hey white american teenagers!
    watch this and remember: the indians, the chinese and the russians are gonna eat your lunch (cue crazy laugh) ;)
    http://www.ndtv.com/news/videos/video_player.php?id=157644

  16. Re:Niggers by OrangeCatholic · · Score: 1, Funny

    India just gave 38% of smartphone users a RIMjob.

  17. Re:Niggers by OrangeCatholic · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    It comes with Dingleberries.

  18. No, obviously you don't get it. by sdnick · · Score: 4, Informative

    India actually did get hit recently by Muslim terrorists who received intelligence, coordination and orders from neighboring Pakistan over mobile phones for several days as they moved through Mumbai targeting non-Muslims and racking up a body count of 166.

    Saudi Arabia and the UAE didn't suffer any recent attacks coordinated and made possible by mobile phone technology, and both have historically been far more willing to curtail free speech than India (which isn't anywhere near US standards for free speech itself).

    RIM should have hung tough and refused India's request, but at least India had a legitimate reason to ask. "All about spin" - yeah, darn that annoying reality and how it gets in the way of the narrative you prefer.

    1. Re:No, obviously you don't get it. by beh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ah - and decrypting the messages would have solved the problems, as it is phyiscally impossible to write plaintext 'in-code' AND encrypting it?

      The whole thing is bloody nonsense - if I were to plan any attacks, I certainly wouldn't just trust the encryption by a mobile provider as my 'safe haven'...

    2. Re:No, obviously you don't get it. by Mashiki · · Score: 1, Informative

      Nor would I. But India's parliament doesn't exactly work the same way as others do, and many of them are behind the times on their core understanding of technology. Even more-so then in other countries, where government lags on average of 10yrs behind both what the public is saying/thinking, and what they should actually be doing.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    3. Re:No, obviously you don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The instant messaging system has some APIs to extend it, so that a 3rd party program could call a function to send a message through the system, and someone's ported OTR to Java/J2ME already.

      Someone just needs to combine the two, and get a lot of pissed off Saudis and Indian government agents at them...

    4. Re:No, obviously you don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right... and India has such a pristine record with protecting innocents.

      If you're in India, you should be shit-scared, whether you do something "wrong" or not (google for "Lakshmana Kailash K" and read if you're not lazy)

      No surprise I'm posting as AC.

    5. Re:No, obviously you don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The vast majority of terrorists aren't that smart [1]. So, having access to such data is nonetheless useful. When your country (no, your neighborhood) gets attacked by terrorist and were able to do so easily just because the terrorists were easily communicating with blackberry, ring me up.

      [1] http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2009/11/how_smart_are_i.html

    6. Re:No, obviously you don't get it. by darkmeridian · · Score: 1

      Actually, the attackers in Mumbai just spoke over the phone with their coordinator. They have the tapes. There was no encryption or plaintext or whatever. They basically called their leader in Pakistan and asked for instructions and provided updates on their slaughtering. The leader was providing real time info based on TV news or something.

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    7. Re:No, obviously you don't get it. by BangaIorean · · Score: 1, Informative

      Cowardly Anonymous one: This case was sadly, the result of a horrendous miscommunication between the police and the cellphone service provider (Airtel). If you have googled carefully enough, you'd have seen that he was found innocent and let off in 50 days. His case got unprecedented media coverage, and this man has sued both, the police and Airtel. So your attempt to project India as a police state in the league of Saudi Arabia falls flat - try again or troll harder.

    8. Re:No, obviously you don't get it. by Nemyst · · Score: 1

      They'll put anyone who encrypts their messages under a watch list. After all, you don't need to encrypt your messages if you've nothing to hide, right? Right?...

    9. Re:No, obviously you don't get it. by kbahey · · Score: 0

      Check the facts please ...

      Saudi Arabia has its share of terror incidents. For example, the Riyadh Compound bombing, and many more incidents, and more. Just a year ago, the Saudi official and member of the royal family was injured in a terror attack. The terrorist had the bomb in his rectum, and activated it via a mobile phone. Source here.

      Dubai being an international hub of trade and commerce, is always facing threats of criminals and spies operating on its soil. Examples are the murder of Suzanne Tamim, plotted by an Egyptian millionaire, and assassination of Mahmound Al Mabhouh conducted by Israel.

      I under no illusion that India, Saudi Arabia, UAE and whomever else, will snoop on Blackberry and whatever else they can get their hands on, be it for legitimate reasons, or for keeping an eye on their own citizens.

      The bad part is how it is reported differently in the media (censorship vs. terrorism) for the same act (asking for backdoors to a certain technology). That is where the spin is ...

  19. So, there is no security in BB? by MrJones · · Score: 1

    Well, RIM will never confirm this deal because if he does, the Blackberry bussiness is going down.

    This may confirm what we all know, there is always back doors. No matter how long the encryption key is advertized, my email password is always reaching my server in just plain text (sometimes over ssl) and there is where the fun is.

    --
    Get my e-mail after a captcha test in: http://tinymailt
  20. Re:Niggers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your bladder is connected to your vagina? Freak!

  21. Have to wonder ... by PinkyGigglebrain · · Score: 1

    Just how many of the Mumbai attackers were using Blackberrys? And how many will, as already pointed out, just use something else. Plain old walkie-talkies and code words maybe?

    1. Re:Have to wonder ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how many will, as already pointed out, just use something else. Plain old walkie-talkies and code words maybe?

      Just using proper English would confuse the fuck out of most Indians.

    2. Re:Have to wonder ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Um... so most people are not proficient in non-native languages. Oh wow, you've really stumbled upon something new here. zzzz

    3. Re:Have to wonder ... by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      "Just using proper English would confuse the fuck out of most Americans"

      FTFY

      And, I'm more serious than you probably think. I can sit in any public place, and listen to a group of young kids (you know, young kids - twenties and thirties) talking, and not understand a word they've said. Buncha little pricks learned NOTHING in school!

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    4. Re:Have to wonder ... by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 1

      "Just using proper English would confuse the fuck out of most Americans"

      FTFY

      And, I'm more serious than you probably think. I can sit in any public place, and listen to a group of young kids (you know, young kids - twenties and thirties) talking, and not understand a word they've said. Buncha little pricks learned NOTHING in school!

      And get off my lawn!

  22. Re:Niggers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She has a fistula, you insensitive clod type chap!

  23. Re:Watch: How BlackBerry encrypts its emails (Indi by troll8901 · · Score: 1

    From the video (3:12):

    When Blackberry told the Indian government: India needed a lesson on the Internet.

    Hahahaha! But that's not realistic anyway - Indians know as much as us.

    ---

    The key thing is this: It's encrypted data at the cellular operators. ... The government actually monitors here - cellular operators. ... "We don't want to monitor the Internet, we are monitoring only here, because we are interested in mobile phones used by terrorists, not by Internet being used."

    Which RIM refused - to decrypt the emails.

    ---
    However, Blackberry messages (instant messaging) is done at a much lower encryption level (which the video calls "scrambling"). To unscramble, you only require the PIN and Blackberry code. Which RIM has (according to the video) given to the Saudi government.

    Interesting video.

  24. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  25. Re:Niggers by Ironhandx · · Score: 4, Interesting

    and they made my decision on which smartphone to get when my Blackberry Storm kicks the bucket a whole lot easier. One of the reasons I went with them was because of their relative integrity when it comes to my information. If that practice is going out the window then my business just went out the window for them as well, and I'm certain I'm not alone.

  26. Bias Articles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    This is a joke. When the article was about Saudi Arabia the article showed how ignorant, backward, and censored they are.
    Here when it comes to India. Oh yea they blocked it because the "Pakistani"-Based militants! It is their right to have local RIM servers.

    Saudi blocked for security reasons just like UAE. which mainly came from the assassination that happened few months ago.

  27. Are you sure it's *securely* encrypted? by Xenographic · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Verizon has delegated enough authority to let the UAE write SSL certificates impersonating any site which will get automatically accepted by most browsers, so don't you think it's getting hard to know if your communications are actually secure from eavesdropping?

    Part of the problem of secure communications is that there are too many governments who don't want people to have them because people can (and do) plot nefarious things with them.

    1. Re:Are you sure it's *securely* encrypted? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, it was. RIMM uses Private Keys, not public keys. Now they are simply adding additional keys to the signature which will allow any government who demands it, access to traffic in their regions. Boo to RIMM. They should have said, "no" to all countries demanding it and allowed the comms to be blocked. That would have been a hit to the business, but would have earned the respect from companies AND governments around the world that want that level of trust.

      What I want is a clear understanding that when I travel to these less-that-happy-places, that MY data is not unencrypted by those less-than-honorable-governments.

    2. Re:Are you sure it's *securely* encrypted? by idiot900 · · Score: 1

      That's absolutely terrifying.

      This also highlights the fact that Verizon can impersonate any site, and that there is little chance they haven't granted a private key to US intelligence and law-enforcement agencies.

      I guess the moral of this story is that if you want to communicate securely, without every government under the sun listening, you have to manage the encryption yourself.

    3. Re:Are you sure it's *securely* encrypted? by vlueboy · · Score: 1

      That would have been a hit to the business, but would have earned the respect from companies AND governments around the world that want that level of trust.

      The equation is unevenly weighted:
      a) "Respect" is nothing tangible to shareholders, and can be easily lost by failings later on
      b) "Business" loss in one whole country means big revenue loss, and can't be easily gained. Losing it by earning temporary "respect" is a losing proposition.

    4. Re:Are you sure it's *securely* encrypted? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In a publicly traded company, goodwill is reflected in the value of the stock, so it stands to reason it would be tangible to the shareholders. Whether the magnitude of loss of revenues vs that of goodwill is the same is another question that probably factored into RIM's decision.

  28. Pakistani-based by nick_davison · · Score: 0, Troll

    "Pakistani-based militants used mobile and satellite phones..."

    Were they Pakistani? Or Pakistan-based?

    Just like a person can be English or England-based but there's no such thing as English-based person, there's no such thing as a Pakistani-based person.

    Grammar nazi? Perhaps. But it's kind of unfortunate when we can't even get regional cultural terms right before setting ourselves up as experts and discussing the nuances of what's morally right or wrong for that region.

  29. Re:Why malign Pakistan or Blackberry? by dooode · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Pakistan has been the (alleged and many a times proven) source of funding for most terrorist attacks. Blackberry has been the alleged/potential medium for communication for terrorists that can not be traced. I see nothing draconian about Indian government requesting Blackberry asking for tracking their data, specially when ever other telecom provider does.

    Btw. even today there is a news headline about how Indian police cracked a murder victim by tracking his cellphone calls:
    http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/bangalore/Infosys-manager-confesses-to-killing-wife-held/articleshow/6308212.cms

    May be Indian police men are not able to track such communications in Blackberries.

  30. You have 23,408 new text messages. by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

    Hello, I m a Indonesian Blackberry usr.
    My country is spyin on me and I got 2 get a lot of $$$ out of the country.
    Plz help. Let me store sum $$$ in ur bank 4 a bit.
    txt me the acnt num, U can has interest 4 thx.

  31. End to end encryption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the end, to be safe and secure, set up your own end to end encryption system.

  32. so... by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

    Does are these countries also Banning SSL? Anyone that gave a shit could easily set up webmail with any one of thousands of hosts. I don't see how this does anything except make RIM look like a giant bunch of pussies. Most companies force their employees to use blackberries for the very reason that they think they are secure. Is that going to continue when not only are they insecure but they are publicly being monitored by countries that are world renown for their corruption? What happens when I fly to these countries? Does rim just hand over my account wholesale? Or do they just get access to what I do there? Or are these servers full mirrors already, so even what I do in the "free" world is indexed?

  33. And I quit using Blackberry already by erroneus · · Score: 1

    Given that RIM never actually lets go of the handsets after their sale, I have always felt a little uncomfortable about their vendor lock-in model. After all, it is a model that makes even Apple and Microsoft jealous as they have managed to pull it off without too much discussion or resistance at all. The only time you hear about it is when their network servers go down for a global blackout. And even then people complain "dumb network model" and not "greedy business model."

    We don't know the limits of the information these governments (and those who have access to the governments) may have. And frankly, I don't like it.

    So as of two days ago, it is "rooted android" for me... and it was long over due... damned crackberry kept me addicted for so long.

  34. Re:Niggers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is this modded flamebait? Mods have no sense of humor.

  35. Re:Niggers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow... I had no idea that existed. Bowels<->stomach is a recursive horror.

  36. Yes that's always it, isn't it by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    Much of the fear comes from worries about terrorists

          I suspect that the rest of the fear comes from worries about pedophiles.

          I mean, those are the two biggest excuses to subvert freedom and expand government power in the West, so why not in India, right?

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  37. Chill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RIM gave them access to encrypted data. RIM has no access to the unencrypted data, they don't have the private keys. Much like giving access to your SSL communication data. RIM will not make a big fuss about it, to help those countries to save face.

    While many complains about the fact that all data goes though the BB enterprise server, that's what is guaranteeing that all wireless data is controlled by the enterprise and secured between the BES and the devices. Once on the BES (from the wireless network), BB data travel via the Internet and is facing the exact same challenges as any other secure protocol over the Internet. If countries want to have access to their citizens BB communications, the best way is to get a court order (or whatever relevant) to install an eye dropping software on the BES or BIS.

    And by the way, the argument that all BB users can exchange messages without government intercepting in their own soil is ludicrous. All wireless service provider can run BIS in their network, thus being in reach of national authorities to get access to the content.

    Of course with a lot of determination, they may get access some data, and in 10-20 years most if it if not all (provided they are willing to keep it all that time).

  38. Re:Why malign Pakistan or Blackberry? by BangaIorean · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I stopped reading when I saw the 'neither does Pakistan' bit. Would be good if you did a Google search for 'Pakistan ISI terrorist support wikileaks'. You will change your opinion pretty soon.

  39. Comin' soon to the west very soon. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  40. Everything should be encrypted by the users. by maillemaker · · Score: 1

    I assume that every single electronic communications system in the world is compromised.

    We should be moving to a standard where every single communication is encrypted, not by the carrier, but by the user. It needs to be ubiquitous.

    Is there an app for the iphone to encrypt calls?

    --
    A work that expires before its copyright never enters the public domain and thus enjoys eternal copyright protection.
  41. So, they already have access to other devices comm by gedw99 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    with al the effort by government to get access to the comm transmissions on Blackberry's, that SEEMS TO INDICATE that they already have access on other mainstream networks and brands.

    this is really worrying.

    g

  42. How to get into the web of trust now? by tepples · · Score: 1

    if you want to communicate securely, without every government under the sun listening, you have to manage the encryption yourself.

    So the CA system has been demonstrated untrustworthy, with rogue roots in the wild. Now how does one validate the first contact with a given party? There is the OpenPGP global web of trust, but as I understand it, joining it requires flying to key-signing parties, and a lot of people don't have the finances to fly often.

  43. H1B1: isn't that some sort of flu? by tepples · · Score: 1

    h1b1

    Is this supposed to be some sort of portmanteau between "H-1B visa" and the naming scheme for Influenzavirus A strains, such as H5N1 "bird" flu or H1N1 "swine" flu?

  44. Online merchants by tepples · · Score: 1

    anyone truly needing encryption will manage their own layered end-to-end solution or have someone competant handle that for them.

    Online shopping customers need encryption so that criminals don't intercept information that could be used to forge purchases. What sort of end-to-end solution do you recommend for web merchants if rogue root CAs have made HTTP over TLS untrustworthy?

    1. Re:Online merchants by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      Self-signed?

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
    2. Re:Online merchants by tepples · · Score: 1

      Self-signed?

      If a merchant uses a self-signed TLS certificate to take customers' payment information, how should the merchant send the fingerprint of its certificate to the customer so that a man in the middle can't substitute his own certificate to eavesdrop on this payment information?

    3. Re:Online merchants by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      TXT records, DNSSEC.

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
  45. At least they told you they were spying on you by el_gato_borracho · · Score: 1

    ... If that practice is going out the window then my business just went out the window for them as well, and I'm certain I'm not alone.

    I certainly understand your sentiment. I wonder where you will go as an alternative? Even if a competing service "refuses to back down", how can you be certain that your messages are not being intercepted? In this day and age, I think we all have to assume that anything we didn't encrypt ourselves is being read by somebody.

    1. Re:At least they told you they were spying on you by Ironhandx · · Score: 1

      Some sort of Android based phone. Then I can encrypt it myself.

      Oh, I could do the same with a BB, but its a bit harder and some things are difficult to remap from the default BB utils.

  46. Not true - it happend long back (2002 !) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The difference between US and India is that with Indian authorities this was released to the press. US instead puts a gag order and then probably gets everything they want.
    NSA probably has a back room in blackberry - or has the encryption codes itself.. !

    "Despite what we are hearing, and considering the public track record of this administration, I simply do not believe their claims that the NSA's spying program is really limited to foreign communications or is otherwise consistent with the NSA's charter or with FISA," Klein's wrote. "And unlike the controversy over targeted wiretaps of individuals' phone calls, this potential spying appears to be applied wholesale to all sorts of internet communications of countless citizens."

    One of the documents is titled "Study Group 3, LGX/Splitter Wiring, San Francisco," and is dated 2002. The others are allegedly a design document instructing technicians how to wire up the taps, and a document that describes the equipment installed in the secret room.

    Read More http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2006/04/70619#ixzz0wavMN6aB"

  47. Supersonic Re:The United States by mrmeval · · Score: 1

    Whooosh

    --
    I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
  48. Only RIM Blackberrys? by PPH · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I know a number of people with corporate-issued Blackberrys. One of the featuures that made these attractive to corporate customers was that RIM set them up with their own server infrastructure. This placed encryption and data security in the hands of their IT departments. While the networks over which data traffic travels might be intercepted by foreign officials, those messages remain encrypted until they arrive at the company servers. RIM is out of the loop.

    How do these governments deal with such networks?

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Only RIM Blackberrys? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By ordering the company (via subpoena) to hand over their private keys.

    2. Re:Only RIM Blackberrys? by lennier · · Score: 1

      I know a number of people with corporate-issued Blackberrys. One of the featuures that made these attractive to corporate customers was that RIM set them up with their own server infrastructure. This placed encryption and data security in the hands of their IT departments.

      Sure about that? With a standard BES install, data to and from the device gets routed via Blackberry's corporate servers, so if they could crack the encryption they'd have a copy of every corporate email ever. Supposedly it's AES encrypted at the endpoints, yes. But how is an admin going to verify how strong the crypto really is in a server binary that you don't have source code to? I know I'm not smart enough to do that. I would feel a little safer if the BES talked directly to the device through the layer-3 network of my choice rather than through one company's application-level gateways.

      Maybe there are special exotic BES setups which don't route via Blackberry servers, but it's not how I understand the system works for most companies.

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
    3. Re:Only RIM Blackberrys? by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      Isn't the public key more than sufficient to decrypt all the data?

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    4. Re:Only RIM Blackberrys? by PPH · · Score: 1

      The point is that corporate systems treat all networks (Blackberry company networks included) as untrusted. The messages may route through Blackberry systems, but only in encrypted form.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  49. slippery slope by Gerard+Ketuma · · Score: 0

    this is a slippery slope that RIM has created for itself and there is no turning back now.

    --
    http://weboven.blogspot.com
  50. No doubt the US gov't already has access by mysidia · · Score: 1

    But thanks to the 'National Security Letters' power, they don't have to tell anyone, and they can force all the parties involved to not disclose to the public that ALL UR BLACKBERRY MESSAGES ARE BELONG TO THEM.

  51. miao mamao by Mana+Mana · · Score: 1

    > TSA extended the definition of box cutters to include _nail clippers_

    I stopped taking you seriously after this. TSA stopped banning these years ago.

  52. Blackberry Straragy by helix2301 · · Score: 1

    I can’t be leave RIM is going to do this they never crumble to anyone. I guess like the article says this is a business move. This is where technology security and the finance department but heads and usually the finance department wins seen this many times in companies.

  53. government by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    There are worse things that can happen than losing a bit of your privacy to a government you cant trust.

    How many people have terrorists killed? Now how many people have governments killed? In the past century NAZIs killed more than 600,000 Jews alone. At the same tyme Stalin's Soviet Union killed 20 million and Mao 60 million in China. More recently, from 1975 to '79 the Khmer Rouge beat the NAZIs body count, estimates of more than a million were executed. At the same tyme with the support of the US Indonesia's ruler Gen Suharto ordered the invasion of East Timor. After the 1975 invasion 200,000 East Timorese, 1/3 the population, were killed. Also in 1979, and after, people in Iran were persecuted for not living according to Sharia Law. Next door in Iraq throughout the 1980s and '90s Saddam ordered chemical weapons be used against others in Iraq. Or take Rwanda, in 1994 an estimated 800,000 people were mass murdered.

    Still think terrorists are a greater threat than government?

    Falcon

  54. Not really useful by Haedrian · · Score: 1

    Now if I want to send a private messages to my militant friend who is going to blow something up in India, I encrypt it BEFORE I send it.

    Problem solved.

  55. Are they not under water? by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    Maybe I am wrong, but is there not some huge water disaster over there right now flooding etc... should this not be like, the least of their concern, and maybe getting relief and food out to their people, instead of wanting blackberry towers? Maybe they will all be able to text where they are located to send the boats for them???

    1. Re:Are they not under water? by dooode · · Score: 1

      Yes you are wrong :) That's in Pakistan, not India. Do read BBC, NewYorkTimes or as a matter of fact any newspaper sometimes.

    2. Re:Are they not under water? by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      I was being facetious, sorry about that, thought you got the joke.

    3. Re:Are they not under water? by dooode · · Score: 1

      Neither is the recent flooding any form of joke for Pakistanis, nor is the safeguarding of its population (against terrorism) any joke for India.

      Privacy may be a big concern in the US and EU, but most surveys in India actually give precedence to Security over privacy; even if it leads to Government spying on communication. Trust me, there is nothing facetious about this...

    4. Re:Are they not under water? by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      I will say this once, and then i will move on, seeing as you are not getting the picture.
      Here is a clearly defined picture, of India who is having trouble already keeping their country going, for what ever reason, whether disaster or just feeding their people, you really think having texting towers should even be in their present list of priorities?

      Now that fully understand I was talking about priorities and all jokes aside,
      have now come to the conclusion you are a devil's advocate,
      I wish you many OTHER posts to go pester through out your day.

  56. Then what until DNSSEC arrives? by tepples · · Score: 1

    DNSSEC

    So what should a self-signing merchant use to take payment information between August 18, 2010, and the day when both the major home ISPs and the installed base of home PC operating systems have implemented DNSSEC?

    1. Re:Then what until DNSSEC arrives? by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      DNS proxy on home routers, alternate fimwares, appropriate information pages, new service at local PC shops, router reflash. Oh, and if your ISPs are running on 2+ y.o. DNS server software, I feel sorry for you (no sark intended).

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.