'You're guilty unless you can prove it'. No, see, Kavanaugh, was guilty - without proof - until he could prove otherwise. In this case, she actually has a long list of proof against her, and is deemed guilty unless she can find a way to invalidate the proofs the university has against her.
Rotten Tomatoes *doesn't* allow for reviews before opening night of films. These aren't "fake reviews", this is a stat on Rotten Tomatoes that measures the interest in seeing (as seeing in the future) the film in question.
According to the methodology used in this social "sciences" study, Trump is abused several times per second. Should we all start treating him like a poor helpless victim, just like the social "sciences" want us to treat all the other "under-privileged" groups?
Funny how even after all the backlash, she still tries to play the gender card yet again: "The message is very clear, especially to *women* at the company,"
Stop telling science what is has to do! This new Alt-Left thinks they are always in the right, that they should be the moral compass of mankind, but well, they are just a bunch of loonies not unlike their Alt-Right antagonists.
Science is not your political tool nor your trowing stone, when you bring political motivation into science it stops being science, just look at eugenics.
Let science be science and stop trying to force us to put you, the alt-Left loonies in your self appointed moral pedestal... nobody out of your circle jerk actually believes you are entitled to it.
> If the attire matches our dress code, then they can proceed and we can explain to the attendee why that form of dress is allowed. If they are clearly in violation, we will ask them to change.
Basic message: you are not allowed to dress whatever you want in the West, unless you belong to a very particular religious group. In that case, heavens forbid if anyone tells you how to dress or you will feel the wrath of the SJWs.
Yes, and that's the sexist issue here. She didn't lost the presidential election because she is a woman, but she won the Democratic Primaries in part by playing the: "I'm a woman" card to the public while in the back stage she was manipulating the DNC.
True that the roof may cost less than a normal one, but the big costs come from the batteries that you will have to install to take advantage of it, and those actually cost quite a lot more.
Just like cops shooting people of color at 2-10 times the rate of whites is a coincidence.
That's actually false. There is a greater probability you get shoot by the police when they stop you if you are white than if you are black. Blame the media that only nitpicks the cases where black people are shoot by the police for putting that idea on people's heads.
I was wondering how on hell could they destroy the company so quickly. After reading that: "In one year the administration went from 20% female to 80% female." everything finally made sense.
Problem is that now the only option is some egomaniacal orange troll. You should have thought about that when Hillary was playing her tradicional gender card against Sanders and you felt for it. Now it's a bit too late.
So the EU can just come down and tell it's member countries who they are and aren't allowed to give tax breaks to
Yes, and that's one of the fundamental necessities for a free trade zone.
It's quite easy, Ireland can make as many tax breaks as they want for Apple as long as they are out of EU. If they want to be in EU and trade in the EU open market, then they must be subject to some basic rules.
Also, Apple has to pay these taxes, because they had profit and they failed to pay their respective taxes for more than 1 decade. They aren't going bankrupt by paying taxes over their profits like you are saying.
Why would they sue? The DAO wording very clearly states that for all possible purposes including legal ones the code is the contract. Whoever did this, did exactly what the contract stated.
Besides why would people what a smart contract based blockchain currency if the contracts wouldn't be solved by those smart contracts but by a traditional court? Doesn't that defeat the all purpose of the currency? I bet these people are not feeling so "libertarian" right now.
Don't you understand that in the countries where most of these people use these platforms there are laws that forbid governments to go and tell these platforms to shut down accounts just because they don't like what those accounts are saying?
Slashdot Mirror
Remember folks, it's always the white men fault - even when it's some-other-colour men doing it.
It's funny 'casue it's Chinese doing most of the pollution.
White-separatists, as in Catalonia, Spain?
Can't understand why Apple just doesn't make them run slower: https://www.cnet.com/news/appl...
The only "technical prowess" described in the article, is stealing a password from someone.
'You're guilty unless you can prove it'. No, see, Kavanaugh, was guilty - without proof - until he could prove otherwise. In this case, she actually has a long list of proof against her, and is deemed guilty unless she can find a way to invalidate the proofs the university has against her.
Google Finds It’s Underpaying Many Men as It Addresses Wage Equity https://www.nytimes.com/2019/0...
Rotten Tomatoes *doesn't* allow for reviews before opening night of films. These aren't "fake reviews", this is a stat on Rotten Tomatoes that measures the interest in seeing (as seeing in the future) the film in question.
According to the methodology used in this social "sciences" study, Trump is abused several times per second. Should we all start treating him like a poor helpless victim, just like the social "sciences" want us to treat all the other "under-privileged" groups?
Funny how even after all the backlash, she still tries to play the gender card yet again: "The message is very clear, especially to *women* at the company,"
Darwin Award material right there.
Stop telling science what is has to do! This new Alt-Left thinks they are always in the right, that they should be the moral compass of mankind, but well, they are just a bunch of loonies not unlike their Alt-Right antagonists.
Science is not your political tool nor your trowing stone, when you bring political motivation into science it stops being science, just look at eugenics.
Let science be science and stop trying to force us to put you, the alt-Left loonies in your self appointed moral pedestal... nobody out of your circle jerk actually believes you are entitled to it.
Yup, Mark Shuttleworth nailed it and it resounds perfectly well with these nut anti-systemd zealots.
> If the attire matches our dress code, then they can proceed and we can explain to the attendee why that form of dress is allowed. If they are clearly in violation, we will ask them to change.
Basic message: you are not allowed to dress whatever you want in the West, unless you belong to a very particular religious group. In that case, heavens forbid if anyone tells you how to dress or you will feel the wrath of the SJWs.
Yes, and that's the sexist issue here. She didn't lost the presidential election because she is a woman, but she won the Democratic Primaries in part by playing the: "I'm a woman" card to the public while in the back stage she was manipulating the DNC.
True that the roof may cost less than a normal one, but the big costs come from the batteries that you will have to install to take advantage of it, and those actually cost quite a lot more.
Just like cops shooting people of color at 2-10 times the rate of whites is a coincidence.
That's actually false. There is a greater probability you get shoot by the police when they stop you if you are white than if you are black. Blame the media that only nitpicks the cases where black people are shoot by the police for putting that idea on people's heads.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/12/upshot/surprising-new-evidence-shows-bias-in-police-use-of-force-but-not-in-shootings.html?_r=2
The question you should be putting is why does the OP think that greater competence is tied to the feminine gender.
I was wondering how on hell could they destroy the company so quickly. After reading that: "In one year the administration went from 20% female to 80% female." everything finally made sense.
And it worked out really nice for Yahoo! Let woman run the all world as they did in Yahoo and we'll have a new age of enlightenment for sure.
Problem is that now the only option is some egomaniacal orange troll. You should have thought about that when Hillary was playing her tradicional gender card against Sanders and you felt for it. Now it's a bit too late.
So the EU can just come down and tell it's member countries who they are and aren't allowed to give tax breaks to
Yes, and that's one of the fundamental necessities for a free trade zone.
It's quite easy, Ireland can make as many tax breaks as they want for Apple as long as they are out of EU. If they want to be in EU and trade in the EU open market, then they must be subject to some basic rules.
Also, Apple has to pay these taxes, because they had profit and they failed to pay their respective taxes for more than 1 decade. They aren't going bankrupt by paying taxes over their profits like you are saying.
I'm a totally libertarian guy... until they mess with my money, because then I cry for the intervention of the state and the real courts of law.
Why would they sue? The DAO wording very clearly states that for all possible purposes including legal ones the code is the contract. Whoever did this, did exactly what the contract stated.
Besides why would people what a smart contract based blockchain currency if the contracts wouldn't be solved by those smart contracts but by a traditional court? Doesn't that defeat the all purpose of the currency? I bet these people are not feeling so "libertarian" right now.
Don't you understand that in the countries where most of these people use these platforms there are laws that forbid governments to go and tell these platforms to shut down accounts just because they don't like what those accounts are saying?