Slashdot Mirror


"Dislike" Button Scam Hits Facebook Users

An anonymous reader writes "A message saying 'I just got the Dislike button, so now I can dislike all of your dumb posts lol!!' is spreading rapidly on Facebook, tempting unsuspecting users into believing that they will be able to "dislike" posts as well as "like" them. However, security researchers say that it is just the latest 'survey scam', tricking Facebook users into into giving a rogue Facebook application permission to access their profile, and posting spam messages from their account. The rogue application requires victims to complete an online survey (which makes money for the scammers) before ultimately redirecting to a Firefox browser add-on for a Facebook dislike button developed by FaceMod. "As far as we can tell, FaceMod aren't connected with the scam — their browser add-on is simply being used as bait," says Sophos security blogger Graham Cluley."

117 of 179 comments (clear)

  1. Mod the post by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 4, Funny

    -1 "Dislike"

    1. Re:Mod the post by Jurily · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why should I care about the scuttlebutt of the internet.

      Don't know about you, but a lot of my friends use it, and guess who gets to clean up the mess every time they fall for something like this.

    2. Re:Mod the post by FuckingNickName · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't know... are they responsible for themselves?

      Oh, that's right, they never have to learn because you'll be there to fix the problem every time.

    3. Re:Mod the post by jgagnon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It takes a village to raise an idiot...

      --
      Remember to maintain your supply of /facepalm oil to prevent chafing.
    4. Re:Mod the post by ciderbrew · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because they get their machines taken over.
      A bot-net gets bigger.
      A granny can't use her machine.
      Evil porn is served up from Teh Gran Machine.
      The state kick down Gran's door and take her away.
      Gran gets 30 years in jail. She's 96.

      I missed out profit & base ownership claims. It is all bad for Gran.

    5. Re:Mod the post by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      You're obviously not a sailor. The scuttlebutt is a good place to hang out, hear the gossip, swap lies, learn irrelevant stuff, and get a drink, while avoiding work.

      Oh - wait - maybe you have it right after all?

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    6. Re:Mod the post by dunezone · · Score: 1

      And charge them every time.

    7. Re:Mod the post by goombah99 · · Score: 1

      yes that was exactly my use of the word. You just can't quench your thirst there.

      --
      Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    8. Re:Mod the post by JustOK · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yes, please. Swiss. Just the holes (they taste better), if you don't mind, and even if you do. Thanks for asking.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    9. Re:Mod the post by cjjjer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I used to do this as well till I got tired of "fixing" my families and friends computers all the time. I stopped and when they had issues told them to take it to XYC company to get it fixed as I was "busy" a nice big fat bill and in some cases losing all their files made them think a bit more about security and "just clicking on any-old-thing".

    10. Re:Mod the post by arkane1234 · · Score: 3, Funny

      ... but it only takes a B-52 to raze a village.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    11. Re:Mod the post by jgagnon · · Score: 3, Funny

      Love Shack, baby!

      --
      Remember to maintain your supply of /facepalm oil to prevent chafing.
    12. Re:Mod the post by CeruleanDragon · · Score: 1

      Oh come on... there's gotta be *some* way to make profit in all of that... maybe steal her underwear while she's in jail? (yes, South Park reference, not meant to be dirty)

      --
      ad astra per alia porci
    13. Re:Mod the post by jonoid · · Score: 1

      The thing is that this is such an easy thing to identify as a scam. I noticed on my news feed about this, clicked the link and was redirected to a "click here to enable this button" page that was pure text, no Facebook log or anything. So obviously a scam of some sort that I cant believe anyone would fall for this sort of thing.

    14. Re:Mod the post by mcgrew · · Score: 1, Troll

      It takes a village to raise a child, it only takes a child with matches to raze a village.

    15. Re:Mod the post by GeckoAddict · · Score: 1

      Start charging them going rates and I'll bet you they become a lot more interested in security...

    16. Re:Mod the post by kenj0418 · · Score: 1

      Gran gets 30 years in jail. She's 96.

      I missed out profit ...It is all bad for Gran.

      I don' t know - sounds like free nursing home care to me. I'll have to remember this strategy for later.

    17. Re:Mod the post by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      ...so this is Social Security?

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    18. Re:Mod the post by CeruleanDragon · · Score: 1

      Troll?? Aw come on, that was at least marginally funny. Don't even tell me you've never wanted to stone some complete idiot. Maybe not to death, let's not be mean, but at least pelt them with pebbles.

      --
      ad astra per alia porci
    19. Re:Mod the post by krewemaynard · · Score: 1

      Like ='3

      --
      I saw it on Slashdot, it must be true!
    20. Re:Mod the post by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Why should I care about the scuttlebutt of the internet.

      Says the guy commenting on a Slashdot article.

    21. Re:Mod the post by SnEptUne · · Score: 1

      Just made them use Linux/BSD.

  2. News? by SimonTheSoundMan · · Score: 3, Informative

    Been going on for months.

    1. Re:News? by l0b0 · · Score: 1

      How about years? It's still September...

  3. Everybody Panic! by commodore64_love · · Score: 2, Funny

    OH Noes!

    (obligatory anim GIF) http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n13/greatcapp/oh-noes-everybody-panic.gif

    I never listen to those "check out this new feature" ads.
    Invariably you have to hop through hoops. It's never free.

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
  4. Facebook is a Ponzi scheme by hessian · · Score: 1, Interesting

    1. Set up really popular new big thing!
    2. Have 500 million morons congregate.
    3. They do ??? which is important because ???
    4. Sell ads for products they probably don't purchase because they're just goofing off on the internet because they're too broke to go do something fun instead.
    5. ???
    6. Profit!

    1. Re:Facebook is a Ponzi scheme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      While your little list doesn't really make any sense, I do agree that Facebook doesn't currently have a sustainable business model. However, how does any of that equate to a Ponzi Scheme? Or do you have absolutely no idea what that means, and just thought it sounded good?

    2. Re:Facebook is a Ponzi scheme by Abcd1234 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Uhuh. The you don't know what a Ponzi scheme is, and it's the *facebook* users that are the morons... riiiight.

    3. Re:Facebook is a Ponzi scheme by jgagnon · · Score: 1, Redundant

      They could easily sustain themselves with targeted advertising. Assuming, of course, they do it right.

      --
      Remember to maintain your supply of /facepalm oil to prevent chafing.
  5. Dislike by geekgirlandrea · · Score: 4, Funny

    Can I just have a 'Dislike' button for all of Facebook, please?

    Actually, I think I'll take a 'Tactical Nuclear Strike' button instead, now that I think of it.

    1. Re:Dislike by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Informative

      There's a Safari addon called 'defacer' which removes all Facebook buttons and links from every page that you visit (I've not tried it, I just noticed it the other day). Presumably there are similar things for other browsers...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:Dislike by ciderbrew · · Score: 1

      Yes you can. You can have both of them.
      It will lead you to another bit of malware. Best not click on anything.

      Ever. At all. Never again. version 2.3.this.time.'it's'.personal

    3. Re:Dislike by Yvan256 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually, I think I'll take a 'Tactical Nuclear Strike' button instead, now that I think of it.

      Unable to comply. Ghost Academy required.

    4. Re:Dislike by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      I believe the hotkey is "N"

    5. Re:Dislike by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, it's a Science Facility with Covert Ops, and a Nuclear Silo attached to your Command Center. ...whaddya mean, "There's a second one."?

    6. Re:Dislike by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      There is another system.

    7. Re:Dislike by clone53421 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I just have the following AdBlock Plus rules...

      facebook.com$third-party,~domain=fbcdn.net
      fbcdn.net$third-party,~domain=facebook.com

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    8. Re:Dislike by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the correction. I had created the filters on my home computer and then tried to re-write them from memory...

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    9. Re:Dislike by xSander · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think I'll take a 'Tactical Nuclear Strike' button instead, now that I think of it.

      And a Tactical Nuclear Pinguin to go along with it?

  6. And? by meisenst · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is not new news, really. There is always some scam going around that takes advantage of the inability of most users to distinguish untrusted content from trusted content, not to mention the people who click Yes to every pop-up without understanding what they've just done.

    Facebook is a gold mine for scams like this. There are way too many people using the site that don't care about the dangers. Apathy and ignorance are best ways to spread this kind of thing, and they are found aplenty in any social networking crowd, at least when it comes to the technology behind the social aspect.

    --
    Green's Law of Debate: Anything is possible if you don't know what you're talking about.
    1. Re:And? by Securityemo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's not that they don't care, it's that they can't percieve what's real content and not - because they don't have a model of the underlying structure beyond the surface of the content.

      --
      Emotions! In your brain!
    2. Re:And? by jeffmeden · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This one gets bonus points for spreading by appealing to the dark side of human nature with their offer of a new and exciting way to threadcrap. As if random popup ads don't snare enough people, now they are out there with an appealing product (at face value anyway) that users have to actively resist. Just when the idea of Facebook itself as a scam was gaining traction, now we have this shit-sandwich-deep-fried-in-vomit craze sweeping the 'tubes. The internet is doomed!

    3. Re:And? by Securityemo · · Score: 1

      In this case, specifically:
      What's a browser extension?
      But the button appears inside the facebook page, so it's "on the web page" and not on my computer...
      It's facebooks system, if there's a virus loose in their system it's their problem not mine!
      How can it send spam messages? Can a virus click the "send" button? But I'd notice if my mouse cursor would move, and I turn my computer off at night!
      How can someone possibly make money off stuff that's in the phone book? You're just being hysterical. What do you mean "data mining algorithms"? I'm being ripped off by the dwarven mafia now?
      Etc., I'm sure you can imagine more things along that vein...

      --
      Emotions! In your brain!
    4. Re:And? by rufty_tufty · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think that's harsh to most users.
      In this day and age we expect to be able to do most things without understanding the fundamentals that they are built on.
      How many people who use a bank/have a mortgage have a degree in economics and accounting?
      How many people who drive a car can strip the engine down to component parts and successfully rebuild it.
      How many software engineers can architect a modern CPU right down to the logic synthesis and asic layout complete with timing closure and dealing with sub micron silicon effects such as crosstalk and antenna diodes.
      You shouldn't need to have the underlying structural knowledge of everything in order to accomplish common everyday tasks. Tools for staying in touch with friends are tools to help a common everyday task.

      As long as facebook aims itself at novices to the web then it should be usable by newbies. Being a clueless novice is not a crime, we've all been there. Facebook is sold to many as one of the reasons to start going on the web, but yet is one of the most dangerous places for new people to play about with,
      I blame those who run facebook not the users.
      So yes I am on facebook because it is a great place to tag photos of people and because almost all my friends are on it so it's a good way keep up with people who you don't see as often as you'd like. I don't think that means that I am about to buy a pet rock because I am on facebook to be tagged in photos, get invited to parties, be reminded of birthdays, and be informed that my old friend from Uni has just had a baby.

      --
      "The weirdest thing about a mind, is that every answer that you find, is the basis of a brand new cliche" -
    5. Re:And? by GeckoAddict · · Score: 1

      Well said, and explains the entire reason behind these scams (also pretty much explains every situation in which someone gets taken advantage of in an area they know little about). The real question now is what to do about it.

    6. Re:And? by siddesu · · Score: 1

      And - here's the real moral of the story:

      If your users request a feature often and with a passion, you either give it to them, or someone else does :D

    7. Re:And? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Apathy and ignorance are best ways to spread this kind of thing

      Q: What's the difference between apathy and ignorance?
      A: I don't know and I don't care!

    8. Re:And? by Nethead · · Score: 1

      Hey! Don't be dissin' bell-bottoms!

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    9. Re:And? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      In this day and age we expect to be able to do most things without understanding the fundamentals that they are built on.

      That may be an unrealistic expectation in some ways. I think that people should be expecting to learn the fundamentals of mathematics and physics. They don't need quantum physics at this stage, but it would be nice if they had some idea that objects at motion tend to remain in motion so that they have less chance of driving up one another's arse on the expressway, and so on. People ought to understand the difference between ionizing and non-ionizing radiation so they understand why they need to stay out of the sun at midday :p

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:And? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      "people who click Yes to every pop-up without understanding what they've just done"

      People don't click Yes to every pop-up without reading. They click the left button to every pop-up without reading.

    11. Re:And? by meisenst · · Score: 1

      Sure, I'll agree with you on some of these points, but:

      Your phone rings, you pick up. You hear a momentary "click" as you're transferred to an operator, who tells you that you've just won a trip to Jamaica, and that he needs your credit card information to proceed with awarding you your trip. What do you do? Do you assume that he's legit and dole out your credit card to him, or do you use your brain?

      The same thinking isn't applied to web objects often enough at all. So, Average Joe may not understand the fundamentals upon which a web application is built -- nor should they have to -- but they should certainly understand the fundamentals of human behaviour. If not, clicking on every link and every popup is certain to teach them a thing or two, fairly quickly.

      Also, how is this Facebook's problem? They provide the medium, but they can't be responsible for the message it delivers, or they'd be actively censoring everything everyone does on their site. Have you seen some of the drivel these sites deliver? Can you imagine being one of the operators charged with keeping it all in line? I can't. I'd go mad. Or, rather, I'd go mad if I were policing today's level of FB content -- if FB were censored, I doubt it would ever have become this popular.

      --
      Green's Law of Debate: Anything is possible if you don't know what you're talking about.
    12. Re:And? by rufty_tufty · · Score: 1

      I think the reason I blame facebook is twofold. First they keep changing things, so it's hard for a newbie to get used to what is a legitimate intrusion because it's out of the ordinary, or just facebook playing with their interface.
      To use your example, imagine day 1 you didn't dial your phone you always asked to speak to the operator. Then day 3 you had to dial the number yourself. Then by day 5 adverts had started to appear whenever you dialled an 0800 number, then by day 6 instead of dialling first then advert, you had to wait for the advert then dial. If someone was used to this before the phone call, then if one day you start to get the situation you describe above I don't think you'd be that surprised by the Jamaica trip...
      Yes I know we'd baulk if the phone service was like this, but that to me begs the question of why we accept it from the web.

      The second beef I have with facebook is their all or nothing security model for applications. If they'd just have even the most basic security layering then I think a lot of these problems would be less worrysome. If you could set your preferences to allow what you allowed application to have access to then I think many of these problems wouldn't be half as bad.
      I suspect the reason they don't do this is because their code base has grown quite spaghetti-like with the evolution path they have had and so it is currently too difficult to do. I can't see any other reason why they wouldn't do it.
      I think however the combination of these two failings of facebook means that the novice user is used to weird stuff changing and asking for things he doesn't understand and there is no way for an experienced friend to lock down the system so it is safe. Where is the facebook equivalent of training wheels or the rifle range?
      I see your point that people should have some basic concepts of common sense, but there's nothing common about it and where are you suggesting these people learn these basic rules?

      --
      "The weirdest thing about a mind, is that every answer that you find, is the basis of a brand new cliche" -
    13. Re:And? by rufty_tufty · · Score: 1

      While I agree with everything you say there, I chose my examples very carefully and while my expectation may be slightly unrealistic i think it is a responsibility of engineers (myself included) to aim for that in the things we build. Fundamentally if the average person cannot use a system designed to be used by the average user then I have to blame the designer.
      Take my bank example, many people who were unaware of the finer details of how the finance system works were bit by sub prime mortgages.
      I'm fairly sure on a daily basis car owners are ripped off by those who run car maintenance businesses. Even people who know what they're talking about can be mistaken and mislead by the electronics in modern cars.
      And the less I say about some software engineers and how they abuse, misuse and underutilise the underlying hardware the better.

      I think what I'm getting at is that all this seems very important and obvious to us as geeks, but there are many other things in life that should be obvious and are fundamental to modern life, but that I don't understand. Take the offside rule in football for example, much to the annoyance of my fiancée I haven't a clue about it and she would treat that as something as basic as we treat ionizing radiation. Do I really care? Not really, so I don't bother to fix that missing piece of knowledge. I think the same applies to none geeks and even the more basic parts of online security.
      For me it's been a lesson learned in life that what is important and fundamental to me is not so to everyone and one of the best things to do is accept that and work out how we can make the world a better place knowing that. I would also say that blaming the other person rarely helps, so what can we do as geeks and engineers to improve the situation from our side.

      --
      "The weirdest thing about a mind, is that every answer that you find, is the basis of a brand new cliche" -
    14. Re:And? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I think what I'm getting at is that all this seems very important and obvious to us as geeks, but there are many other things in life that should be obvious and are fundamental to modern life, but that I don't understand. Take the offside rule in football for example, much to the annoyance of my fiancée I haven't a clue about it and she would treat that as something as basic as we treat ionizing radiation. Do I really care? Not really, so I don't bother to fix that missing piece of knowledge. I think the same applies to none geeks and even the more basic parts of online security.

      I totally disagree. You only need to know about esoterica of stupid jock sports if you watch them or play them. We all use computers, though, so information security should be important to all of us. We all have to deal with both ionizing and non-ionizing radiation.

      For me it's been a lesson learned in life that what is important and fundamental to me is not so to everyone and one of the best things to do is accept that and work out how we can make the world a better place knowing that. I would also say that blaming the other person rarely helps, so what can we do as geeks and engineers to improve the situation from our side.

      I think the solution comes from both ends. A total dipshit can drive a car around, and in this country, even get a license. But if you take the time to learn some skills you both have a better experience (most drivers can't even apex a fucking turn, they're throwing themselves and their passengers around like bags of flour for no reason) and a safer one for yourself and others around you. I am vastly more skilled than the average driver and yet I don't know shit compared to anyone who's been to a two-day racing school (although life has taught me pretty well to escape from most skids.) Somewhere there is a sweet spot of effort vs. benefit... but most people have been failed by the education system and are nowhere near it in most anything they do.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    15. Re:And? by rufty_tufty · · Score: 1

      The use of knowing esoterica of sports is that the vast majority of the population does, so it leaves me a bit of a social outcast. That said the vast majority of the population seems to like American Idol and soaps so...

      As for hitting the apex of a corner (Yes I'm going to be modded as offtopic here, but this is a pet thing of mine):
      {puts on IAM motorcycling hat}
      Hitting the apex of a corner is the fastest/lowest G force way of getting around a corner. It is very suited to use on a racetrack but completely unsuited to use on the road. In England here so we drive on LHS of the road, but on a left hand corner you want to be towards the centre of the road to get a better view around the corner. If you apex the turn you have to go slower to give yourself the necessary braking distance for any obstacle that may be around the corner. The same applies to a right hand corner, if you were near the apex there then you're not only losing visibility but you're making yourself very susceptible to people who overshoot the corner, and therefore putting yourself right in their path.
      Now I know this is written from a motorcycle point of view, but the same applies to cars; your speed should be limited not by what your car is capable of, but what you can see and your margins for error (stopping distances, distance between you and opposing traffic etc); apex-ing a turn minimises these...

      --
      "The weirdest thing about a mind, is that every answer that you find, is the basis of a brand new cliche" -
    16. Re:And? by rufty_tufty · · Score: 1

      Dude, chill!

      If the curve is one sharpness, and I am able to reduce that by apexing the turn, I can either go around it faster, or I can go around it with less lateral Gs

      Agreed, the point I failed to make sufficiently was that what also applies to cars is that you should be choosing your road position both for comfort and safety. Part of that is seeing, part of that is being seen. Apexing interferes with both these safety factors both for cars and motorbikes.

      Apexing doesn't mean going as fast as possible.

      Agreed, but most people seek both speed and safety; so I was assuming that you were chasing the maximum speed with a given comfort level - that was certainly the implication I got from your post, because it was about maximising comfort for a given speed. - whereas I was trying to mention that road position could affect safety quite significantly.

      As for your other comments about how I phrased my example, I was trying to give examples that I could directly talk about because I am not 100% certain of how things work in the states having never visited there. It seemed more sensible to state that than to assume everyone reading this would have your frame of reference and instead just state mine.

      --
      "The weirdest thing about a mind, is that every answer that you find, is the basis of a brand new cliche" -
    17. Re:And? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      People are in my lane all the time, I have to pay attention whether I apex or not. I drive defensively in two ways, one by staying in my lane and dodging the fuckwads who try to share it when going the opposite direction, and two, by driving a 3475lb sedan (W126... crumple zones plus mass FTW) and a 6600 lb 4x4.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  7. I dislike by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    everyone of you jerks who beat me to the coveted 'first post'. I dislike you all, a lot.

  8. In other news by should_be_linear · · Score: 4, Insightful

    3295671st variation of "I love you" malware appeared online affecting mostly dumb BFUs.

    --
    839*929
  9. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  10. How is this new? by shadowrat · · Score: 1

    This is everything on facebook. All the "find out what Brady bunch character you are" polls exist only to gain access to your account. Even farmville is just a clever trick to lire users in with a game. Then it spans you and makes money from offers and by directly asking you for money.

    Hell, even facebook itself is just a moneymaking ruse cleverly designed as a way to keep in touch with friends while it gains all your personal info. .

    1. Re:How is this new? by shadowrat · · Score: 3, Funny

      Man did I get screwed over by iPhone spell replacement.

    2. Re:How is this new? by natehoy · · Score: 1

      Are you saying it made a lire of you, which spanned two sentences? ;)

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
  11. Loathing for facebook. by Securityemo · · Score: 2, Informative

    I can't really understand the loathing most people here display for facebook. Or rather, I do, but it seems like people loathe the basic idea of a "IRL overlay" social web? As long as you know enough people who use it, it's great for coordinating IRL activities like parties, birthdays, the nicer kind of activism, etc...

    --
    Emotions! In your brain!
    1. Re:Loathing for facebook. by Dishevel · · Score: 1

      Oh.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    2. Re:Loathing for facebook. by arkane1234 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      it's great for coordinating IRL activities like parties, birthdays, the nicer kind of activism, etc...

      So was MySpace, your point?
      Most of the hate about Facebook is that they are hypocritical and do not care about the values of humans. They will lie to you to get you to post private data up, make it appear as of your privatizing it, then make it so it's public. They'll also harvest (farm? data mine?) information and sell it.
      Other than that, they're great. Uh huh.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
  12. The trick is to block every app on facebook. by coryking · · Score: 1

    Make it a game. Every one of those apps (with a few exceptions) are just spam. You can block them by clicking on the "posted by 'stupid app'" then on the apps page click on "block application".

    Word on the street is there exists a firefox addin that does this for you--but I have never bothered to find it.

    1. Re:The trick is to block every app on facebook. by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Make it a game. Every one of those apps (with a few exceptions) are just spam. You can block them by clicking on the "posted by 'stupid app'" then on the apps page click on "block application".

      A couple years ago, I found a list of the most popular facebook apps and ran a script with wgets to block them all for me. My FB account has thousands of blocked apps (and yes, there is a limit in their DB to how many you can block, which is kind of annoying as I've hit that limit).

  13. Facebook by sheehaje · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Facebook is one of the most useful applications ever on the Internet. Love it or hate it, it connects people and their media. It's social networking on a grand scale.

    With that said, to use one of the greatest applications ever, you must compromise your privacy and security. That's how good Facebook is, no matter how bad the bad is, people keep using it.

    I've thought of emptying my profile several times, and just providing a link to a personal web site. I don't want to delete my account totally, there are still people that I want to keep in contact with that aren't really computer savvy, but know how to use Facebook. I also have a MyBand page for, well, my band. Very useful for letting people know when our shows will be, as well as a great way to connect to our fans.

    I have enough experience with computers (30+ years) to know the scams when I see them. I have never gotten malware/spyware from an online social site. The one thing I do give up is a bit of my privacy. Not that I'm too worried about all the boogie men out there (although I will be more fearful when my kids are old enough to be on it). I do however sometimes feel like George Costanza on Seinfeld where his worlds were colliding. I don't always want to mix personal and business lives, but it seems to happen on Facebook.

    I guess for now, I take the bad with the good and vice versa. I'm too lazy to change the world myself, so I'll leave it to the next visionaries to build a better Facebook and one that is just as popular.

    1. Re:Facebook by mujadaddy · · Score: 2, Funny

      I have never gotten malware/spyware from an online social site.

      Yeah, porn is how they got me, too.

      --
      Populus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur...
      "Force shits upon Reason's back." - Poor Richard's Almanac
    2. Re:Facebook by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 1, Troll

      I have never gotten malware/spyware from an online social site.

      Or so you think. It could be that you have caught one of the ~50% of unknown viruses out there via a mere flash/java exploit... and a good one, you'd never know.

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    3. Re:Facebook by sheehaje · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have never gotten malware/spyware from an online social site.

      Or so you think. It could be that you have caught one of the ~50% of unknown viruses out there via a mere flash/java exploit... and a good one, you'd never know.

      Reminds me of the old adage that if you want computer security, unplug the network cable and disable all removable drives.

    4. Re:Facebook by Timmmm · · Score: 1

      With that said, to use one of the greatest applications ever, you must compromise your privacy and security

      Must? It didn't used to be like this. Back in 2005ish before they added apps, Facebook Connect and so on, it was perfectly secure. In fact, that's why people used it.

      Most people only put their photos and personal details on there because it was impossible for anyone other than your friends to see them. That's more or less still the case, but now any of your friends can fuck up and allow stupid apps access to your stuff.

    5. Re:Facebook by arkane1234 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'll admit it's handy, but the most useful? I actually laughed out loud when I read that.
      It's just a website with people inserting data, and you get to search and read it. There are also "applications" that you can use, but they are basically wastes of time IMHO. In the end, it's a pretty version of MySpace.... only without the hiphop & latino gangsta bullshit.

      There is no "most useful" application ever on the Internet. That term always is subjective, as I consider google mail to be the most useful, with rudder.com being the second most useful for my uses. (financial organization) You may not agree with my decisions, but it has as much credence as your stating that Facebook is one of th emost useful applications ever on the Internet.

      I guess to sum it up, it's not the code that does it, it was simply that it was something people went to as an alternative. Before the mass migration, it was simply because "It's where adults go, it's hosted by a college". It ended up hitting critical mass, and then commercial entities acknowledged it in order to ply their wares.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    6. Re:Facebook by arkane1234 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nothing's safer than 127.0.0.1 :)

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    7. Re:Facebook by rufty_tufty · · Score: 1

      and then seal it in concrete and bury it at the bottom of the nearest sea.
      Even then...

      --
      "The weirdest thing about a mind, is that every answer that you find, is the basis of a brand new cliche" -
  14. Scam? I suppose, but... by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    It looks like a regular waste of time (which, by definition, is the point of all facebook activities, right?).

    Now, there may indeed be a more nefarious info-gathering subtext to this, but otherwise it looks like it posts that you like this app (which many do), that you fill out a survey (which is what lots of people do on FB, based on many of my friends' status updates), and it sends you to a FF add-on.

    This sounds like everything else on FaceBook...I'm waiting for the "then is steals your children and sells them into slavery" part that will make us care about it.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:Scam? I suppose, but... by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but that would be true of every single app on Facebook. Making gullible FB users jump though a pay-questionnaire like they were trying to find the unlock key for a movie on usenet is hardly nefarious. I see this as mostly non-news. *shrug*

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  15. I'm too cool for Facebook. by edmicman · · Score: 3, Funny

    oblig. "I'm too cool for Facebook, and anyone who uses it is Teh Stoopid". post. In fact, I'm so indie I only use websites that don't exist yet that no one else uses, either. And I don't communicate with anyone or anything via the Internet, I only passively consume it. Yay!

    1. Re:I'm too cool for Facebook. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      It it can't be displayed in Lynx I am not interested...

    2. Re:I'm too cool for Facebook. by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      It it can't be displayed in Lynx I am not interested...

      Pfft... newbie wuss. If you were really serious, you'd have demanded it ran on Gopher. :-)

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  16. Re:It's not a Facebook problem by natehoy · · Score: 5, Informative

    The scam hits everyone who uses Facebook, regardless of your browser, if you fall for it.

    At the END of falling for the scam, after you've coughed up your survey answers and subscribed to the application, you would then be directed to a Firefox plugin (which was not developed by the people who are perpetrating the scam), at which point you could only install the plugin if you have Firefox.

    By then, the scam authors couldn't give a shit whether you can use the plugin. It's not theirs, it's just something they found and used to give their scan a razor-thin veneer of respectability. I won't argue about the utility of the plug-in, because it has nothing to do with the scam.

    --
    "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
  17. Easiest way to black facebook by nephridium · · Score: 3, Informative

    ..or you could simply add "127.0.0.1 facebook.com" to your hosts file - one little tweak, works on every OS, on every browser. The cleanest way for all those who just don't care much for it.

    (Btw if you're using localhost as a webserver it's probably better to use 0.0.0.0 for all you annoyance blocking needs instead)

    --


    And when you gaze long enough into the code, the code will also gaze into you.
    1. Re:Easiest way to black facebook by ekwhite · · Score: 1

      Excellent advice. A little edit with Notepad, and its done. Of course, my Hosts file is over 600 kB...

    2. Re:Easiest way to black facebook by GIL_Dude · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I always see that claim that a hosts file works on every OS and every browser. People always seem to forget that if you are using a proxy server (for example at work), the hosts file is ignored. The proxy server controls what the address is. So the hosts file thing works perfectly (and I use it) at home where I don't have to go through a proxy. But it is useless at work (and yes, there are things I would like to block there too - and random facebook and twitter buttons on pages are indeed some of them).

    3. Re:Easiest way to black facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You can also just go to a country where facebook is blocked (like China or Pakistan.)

    4. Re:Easiest way to black facebook by Spazztastic · · Score: 1

      I always see that claim that a hosts file works on every OS and every browser. People always seem to forget that if you are using a proxy server (for example at work), the hosts file is ignored. The proxy server controls what the address is. So the hosts file thing works perfectly (and I use it) at home where I don't have to go through a proxy. But it is useless at work (and yes, there are things I would like to block there too - and random facebook and twitter buttons on pages are indeed some of them).

      Use NoScript and block Facebook/Twitter.

      --
      Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
    5. Re:Easiest way to black facebook by nephridium · · Score: 1

      You could ask the admins (since those are work computers) to have the proxies block those counter-productive websites for you. Of course this would incur the wrath of a certain (hipster) coworker demographic, but at least you wouldn't need to suffer through those facebook and twitter buttons before your untimely death by high-pitched screaming, keyboard bashing and mouse stoning (I hear Apple mice were specially designed with optimal trajectories in mind ;).

      --


      And when you gaze long enough into the code, the code will also gaze into you.
    6. Re:Easiest way to black facebook by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      ..or you could simply add "127.0.0.1 facebook.com" to your hosts file - one little tweak, works on every OS, on every browser. The cleanest way for all those who just don't care much for it. (Btw if you're using localhost as a webserver it's probably better to use 0.0.0.0 for all you annoyance blocking needs instead)

      There's some user her that rabidly points out that 0.0.0.0 will always outperform 127.0.0.1 even if you don't have a local web server as it's always not routable, and 2 characters shorter to parse.

    7. Re:Easiest way to black facebook by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Here’s an even neater trick: Collapse blocked elements.

      Oh wait, that’s AdBlock Plus.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    8. Re:Easiest way to black facebook by MechaStreisand · · Score: 1

      That user is wrong, though, as on FreeBSD at least, 0.0.0.0 goes to the local gateway. So it is not always faster.

      --
      Disclaimer: IANAL. This post is, however, legal advice, and creates an attorney-client relationship.
    9. Re:Easiest way to black facebook by silanea · · Score: 1

      No, APK said his one is 14 MB in size.

      --
      Rudolf Hess edited Mein Kampf. He was the very first grammar nazi.
    10. Re:Easiest way to black facebook by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      The user (an AC that tags posts APK) seems to talk mostly in the context of Windows. http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1743902&cid=33147274

    11. Re:Easiest way to black facebook by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      Thank-you for that. Apparently he's been going for at least a decade.

    12. Re:Easiest way to black facebook by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      This guy is crazier than I thought. http://www.google.com/search?q=Alexander+Peter+Kowalski

    13. Re:Easiest way to black facebook by Trinn · · Score: 1

      Great idea - "I don't like this, let's BAN IT" -- somehow I think there's a failure in logic here.

  18. There SHOULD be all kinds of buttons by ionymous · · Score: 1

    I think socially it would make sense to have some more buttons.
    But they should always be anonymous.
    So when someone posts: "I'm washing my car! Isn't water so amazing!"...
    they'll get a variety of feedback like:

    1 friend likes this
    12 friends think this is stupid
    7 friends say "so what?"

    Then maybe people wouldn't post everything that comes to mind. It would be just like in the real world.
    When someone walks blindly into a group of friends and just says, "I'm washing my car! Isn't water so amazing!", it's bizarre.

    1. Re:There SHOULD be all kinds of buttons by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking you're mistaking Facebook with Twitter.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    2. Re:There SHOULD be all kinds of buttons by ionymous · · Score: 1

      No.. not at all.
      I'm talking about how my "friends" on facebook post statuses that aren't worth posting.
      Maybe all my facebook "friends" are just weird?

    3. Re:There SHOULD be all kinds of buttons by Aphoxema · · Score: 1

      I think socially it would make sense to have some more buttons.

      Ah, you make the wrong assumption that the average person can handle choice. Depressingly they cannot.

      Too many choices confuse people. Look at all those successful sites like Digg, etc. This is also why major corporations offer so few options: to prevent customers from NOT buying due to an abundance of choices. There are whole books written about this phenomenon.

      Exactly, so they should be left with "I might like this or I might just be hitting the button to show attention to the topic" or "I shall do nothing, either due to my own apathy or I may willingly dislike the post. Yet, I may also like this and am unwilling to express it publicly, or maybe like it but not quite enough to state to my peers that I do."

      See how hard just that is?

      --
      "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
    4. Re:There SHOULD be all kinds of buttons by Aphoxema · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, I think you just described what 4chan would be like with buttons.

      Hmm, if you go in /b/ you'll clearly see they're quite satisfied with artistically rendering their response into the form of an image that captures every poignant detail of their deep, meaningful logic.

      --
      "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
  19. !news by TrisexualPuppy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This article isn't really news. It seems that there is *always* something like this happening. Facebook is the perfect place for scams to happen. It's basically the new AOL.

    You have many amateur users who don't understand the first thing about security, and you have millions of them. Millions! Make something that looks slightly "official," and you've got it made. (Remember the old antivirus popups on websites?)

    We basically have a conglomerated database of targets for any exploit in a system that changes its layouts and features so frequently that no one can ever recognize that something looks a little off...

    1. Re:!news by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 2, Insightful

      (Remember the old antivirus popups on websites?)

      Old? Those started becoming popular what? 2-3 years ago? And they are STILL popular, and STILL very nasty.

    2. Re:!news by grumbel · · Score: 1

      You have many amateur users who don't understand the first thing about security, and you have millions of them.

      It is worse then that. Facebook itself actively encourages irresponsible high risk behaviors such has handing out your email password to a third party, thus making the already clueless users even more clueless.

    3. Re:!news by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      I just discovered a new "feature" on Facebook

      - It won't let me friend people that I know from the distant past (like the BBS days). It says "Do you know this user personally? To prevent misuse of Facebook, this request can't be sent." In many cases I can't even send a private message to the person.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    4. Re:!news by lastmouseontheleft · · Score: 1

      ..that's the first time in fifteen years the words "new" and "AOL" have been used in the same sentence. particularly, right next to each other.

  20. The blame here is Facebook's. by DamienNightbane · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The bottom line is that this scam wouldn't be possible if Facebook had implemented a real dislike button years ago when people demanded one.

    1. Re:The blame here is Facebook's. by asdf7890 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And if they add that, I'd like a "meh" button too.

    2. Re:The blame here is Facebook's. by jim_v2000 · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't be possible if Facebook hadn't cluttered everything up with stupid apps.

      --
      Don't take life so seriously. No one makes it out alive.
  21. Is this what the spam looks like? by Pentomino · · Score: 1

    I've been seeing a lot of posts saying "[Name] likes [platitude] on ." from people who would probably never post [platitude]. Things like "Clarence likes “I don't have a temper problem, everyone else needs to stop pissing me off” on ." I'm afraid to click either the platitude or the heart, but I can't really find any evidence about what the hell is going on.

    1. Re:Is this what the spam looks like? by Bambi+Dee · · Score: 1

      From what I've gathered, the "heart" website (I already forgot the name) shows user-generated "platitudes" along with a Facebook "like" feature so people can "like" random bad-assy phrases on their Facebook profiles. It doesn't seem malevolent, though I won't vouch for that.

    2. Re:Is this what the spam looks like? by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      I'm afraid to click either the platitude or the heart, but I can't really find any evidence about what the hell is going on.

      See that “Like” button underneath the post? Go ahead, click it. It won’t hurt you... honest. (It just perpetuates the spam, is all.)

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  22. Here's the problem... by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    FACEBOOK IS A SCAM.

    They exist to derive value from your information. Friends, addresses, posts, even images.

    That the scammers also sell you to other scammers should not be surprising.

    So give Facebook only what you are willing to part with.

    Ok?

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  23. 4chan is not your personal army by Aphoxema · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's "stories" like this that make me wonder if people are trying to use Slashdot to get experienced people to do something about it so they don't have to.

    --
    "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
  24. If you lock everything down... by Animats · · Score: 1

    I run Facebook with almost everything turned off. And Flash with almost everything turned off. And Firefox with the privacy settings on high.

    About half of sites with video won't play. Other sites produce errors because their Flash cookies won't work. YouTube's "Press ESC to exit full screen mode" message stays up forever. (I suspect YouTube does that just to keep people from running with high privacy settings.)

    It's interesting to see who's evil, but somewhat annoying. Still, for every site that's blocked, there seems to be a competitor just as good.

  25. "Rogue" facebook application? WTF? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    Can somebody explain this? I don't think anybody can integrate any bit of code into Facebook.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  26. when will they learn by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    Facebook users need to learn no one really cares that much about their lives and what they do from minute to minute, and having 50000 friends online waiting for you to post what you ate last night makes no sense, and that it is time ill spent, so guess what, more people should just walk away, it has its uses, but really , are we all stars? As for the app being thrown in there, too bad there is no real schema in place AI type going through all the posts to see what facebook users are spewing, and if too much is the same (like a spam) it gets analyzed further, and gets stopped much quicker....i could see that.