Slashdot Mirror


Icelandic Company Designs Human Pylons

Lanxon writes "An architecture and design firm called Choi+Shine has submitted a design for the Icelandic High-Voltage Electrical Pylon International Design Competition which proposes giant human-shaped pylons carrying electricity cables across the country's landscape, reports Wired. The enormous figures would only require slight alterations to existing pylon designs, says the firm, which was awarded an Honorable mention for its design by the competition's judging board. It also won an award from the Boston Society of Architects Unbuilt Architecture competition."

142 comments

  1. In 3000 years.. by grasshoppa · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... archeologists 3000 years from now will puzzle over their purpose. Obviously such a primitive society couldn't have had electricity.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    1. Re:In 3000 years.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Maybe we need to reassess our thoughts on the dinosaurs...

      And on a related aside, the "man-shaped pylon" has room for one more cable connection point...

    2. Re:In 3000 years.. by grasshoppa · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Palin, is that you?

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    3. Re:In 3000 years.. by asukasoryu · · Score: 3, Funny

      Maybe we need to reassess our thoughts on the dinosaurs...

      Dinosaur shaped pylons? Add it to the list!

      --
      There are more things in heaven and earth than are dreamt of in your philosophy.
    4. Re:In 3000 years.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Obviously such a primitive society couldn't have had electricity.

      Look on my works, ye mighty, and be confused.

    5. Re:In 3000 years.. by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A lot of people like to make this claim that in a few thousand years society will have forgotten its ancestry and it will seem so ancient and primitive and confusing.

      While obviously we won't seem as technologically advanced, I have a hard time as thinking of ancient societies as primitive. While their technology wasn't advanced their society isn't all that different from todays. There's an upper and a lower class - a work force and a ruling force - I mean we won't get into the complexities of politics or anything - but even people who think ancient greek religion is dead are actually half wrong: If you've ever read a horrorscope you have encountered a reminance of ancient greek society. All the zodiacs are based upon greek mythology, and a lot of greek mythology is based on the stars which still hold signifigant influence in that zodiac culture.

      The main difference between now and then is that a lot more people have put emphasis on historians. Before the 1800's there really wasn't such a thing as "Archaeologists" - there were "grave robbers" who would break into tombs and sell the valuables but nothing in the interest of preserving history. (Just as a side note, thats why King Tut's Tomb was such a big deal, the first undisturbed tomb of a pharaoh, with valuables and everything still in tact). But now we have Libraries, Museums, historical conservation acts, basically a whole set of society in line with preserving our history. Yes - there WERE libraries in ancient times, but they were nothing like the libraries we have today. Specifically that libraries were not a public resource, only the aristocracy could use the library (both physically and by law, I mean illegal to enter the library if you don't have permission but if you didn't have permission you were probably illiterate anyways). Anyways, since this age of historical preservation has come about, we haven't really "puzzled" over much of society anymore. There are a few small quirks here and there; debates on how they erected the pyramids, how far back "writing" goes, etc etc. But much of it is just 2 widely accepted answers that keep going back and forth on who is right.

      So I guess what I'm trying to say is, 3000 years from now, they won't be going "How did they have electricity back then?" - because we have MANY records of how Benjamin Franklin flew a kite in 1752, and that really sparked development on it. Whereas it was difficult to have the historical records from 1 library survive the test of time way back when, this new fangled internet thing has caused the spread of information so great that the redundancy on our data is so huge that even if every piece of paper is burned and Wikipedia goes down - there are still thousands of documents from every junior high school student that the information is preserved in some form or another. And quite honestly - the sources that AREN'T big are usually the ones with more accurate information. (Every king and pharaoh and emperor claims that they were great - however the accounts from a peasant or soldier are better indicators of how well a nation-state was doing).

    6. Re:In 3000 years.. by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

      See: "Joke".

      Reference ancient Egypt and the finds regarding electricity.

      I have no doubts that records from this time period will survive for far longer than from previous societies.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    7. Re:In 3000 years.. by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I know, I know.

      I just hear a lot of people who DO make that argument as though it holds some water. "We didn't understand society 2000 years ago, so 2000 years from now they won't understand us either!"

      It just annoys when I see it and I couldn't help myself. I mean I kind of knew that you were making the joke and my post wasn't really directed at you, it was just something that came to mind when I read it. I really should get back to work instead of writing long posts on /.

    8. Re:In 3000 years.. by jgagnon · · Score: 2, Funny

      I vote for Cthulhu shaped pylons.

      --
      Remember to maintain your supply of /facepalm oil to prevent chafing.
    9. Re:In 3000 years.. by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 1

      ... archeologists 3000 years from now ...

      will wonder why there is a rusted blob of steel on the ground at regular intervals across uneven terrain. Until they get bored and go to Egypt to check out pyramids.

      --


      "Lame" - Galaxar
    10. Re:In 3000 years.. by msauve · · Score: 1

      I have no doubts that records from this time period will survive for far longer than from previous societies.

      Because punched tape, punched cards, cassette tapes, 9 track tapes, QIC tapes, 8" floppies, 5 1/4" floppies, 3.5" floppies, IOMega discs, Syquest discs, MO discs, ZIP discs, JAZ discs, VHS tapes, 8mm tapes, SmartMedia cards, and xD cards last so much longer than stone tablets.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    11. Re:In 3000 years.. by grasshoppa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think you defeated your own point.

      You just listed 17 forms of storage, which is merely a fraction of what's available. Further, information replication technology being what it is, it's not like 2000 years ago when it took a month+ to scribe a book.

      I'll grant you, it's a question of quantity over quality, but the results are the same; records from our society will last far longer than from previous societies.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    12. Re:In 3000 years.. by xerxesVII · · Score: 1

      That book is still readable, though.

      A few strategically scattered EMPs and all of those tapes and discs could be as valuable as the plastic they're printed on. If the devices to read them are lost, the information on them is lost. With a clay tablet, all a person has to do is crack a code which can be seen by the unaided eye.

      --
      "We shall grapple with the ineffable, and see if we may not eff it after all." - Douglas Adams
    13. Re:In 3000 years.. by stanlyb · · Score: 0

      I guess they will wonder what "Software Patent" or IP is???? In fact, can anyone of explain what SP/IP really is? This is patented too? I have to pay you royalty for the answer? WTF?

    14. Re:In 3000 years.. by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

      And a book is susceptible to fire/rain/environmental effects. More so than many storage mediums we have available today.

      It's not inconceivable that future generations will be unable to reverse engineer a reader device, should it become necessary.

      And it's not as if once data is written to a storage medium, thats it's final destination. How many pictures do you have that were originally taken on the old developed film? Then you moved them to your harddrive, then another harddrive. Maybe you backed them up on a DVD, perhaps a flash drive?

      Again, replication of data is key here.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    15. Re:In 3000 years.. by stanlyb · · Score: 0

      I just wonder, am i allowed to dig in the government top-super-hyper secret documents.... What? I am not allowed? I am not literate enough? How funny that the history is again repeated, lol.

    16. Re:In 3000 years.. by vlm · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      A few strategically scattered EMPs and all of those tapes and discs could be as valuable as the plastic they're printed on.

      Humorously, the first two examples were paper tape and punch cards. Admittedly a six-digit slashdot UID would not be expected to be able to read those, but at least some of us 5 digit UIDs can. Not by inserting into an orifice but looking at them visually. This is an historically interesting skill for us 5 digit UIDs, kind of like going to a Renaissance Faire, although I'm guessing the 2/3/4 digit folks actually submitted slashdot posts via punchcards in ye olden days.

      And as for the plastic comment, the best "paper" tapes were actually made out of mylar, so you were right even when you were wrong, although "best" depends a lot on the gear you use them with, etc. Mylar not so good for certain optical readers, etc.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    17. Re:In 3000 years.. by RDW · · Score: 1

      'I vote for Cthulhu shaped pylons.'

      Pylons are frightening enough already, as anyone exposed to scary UK children's TV in the 70s can tell you:

      http://www.bilderberg.org/changes.htm

    18. Re:In 3000 years.. by Kalidor · · Score: 1

      All of a sudden the Easter Island statues' purpose becomes clear!

      --

      Code softly but carry a big magnet.

    19. Re:In 3000 years.. by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      EMP isn't going to do anything to optical disks and the effects of EMP is often exaggerated in the media.

      A few strategically scattered EMPs are not going to destroy all magnetic media and even if it were to destroy 99.999% of civilian data there are still terabytes and terabytes of national archives, corporate archives, and backups in secure, hardened sites and facilities in the United States and Canada. EMPs across North America to destroy the heartland of the US and Canada won't effect Hawaii, Guam, data on warships/submarines, Okinawa, Diego Garcia, Alaska, the South Pole, US corporations and embassies overseas.

      "An EMP would probably not erase data stored on magnetic tape."

      http://www.empcommission.org/docs/A2473-EMP_Commission-7MB.pdf

    20. Re:In 3000 years.. by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      I've never seen a punch card outside of a display or museum.

      Since /. was started in '97 and went to accounts, what in '98, we weren't using punchcards then.

      I would have been a 2 or 3 digit but I didn't see the point in registering at first.

    21. Re:In 3000 years.. by xerxesVII · · Score: 1

      I did not mean to imply that an EMP would wipe magnetic media, but the devices used to read said media might have some problems working.

      --
      "We shall grapple with the ineffable, and see if we may not eff it after all." - Douglas Adams
    22. Re:In 3000 years.. by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      Ship the media to Alaska, Hawaii, Guam, the South Pole, US Navy submarines, etc. There will be machines to read the media that survive EMP strikes across the US, EU, wherever.

    23. Re:In 3000 years.. by cowscows · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Although I don't have any data to back it up for sure, I'm willing to bet that way more books were printed in the past 50 years than in the previous 5000. Millions of books are still printed every year, and that will continue for the foreseeable future. The "paperless office" only exists in a few isolated cases, paper is still ubiquitous in most of what people do. Even if all our digital data vanished tomorrow, contemporary civilization has left an enormous paper trail, and I would expect there to be plenty for future historians to sift through.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    24. Re:In 3000 years.. by SnarfQuest · · Score: 0

      Electricity? They will be using plasma relays, and ZPM's by then. What is this "electricity" you are talking about? You should at least be using dilithium crystals!

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    25. Re:In 3000 years.. by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      the "man-shaped pylon" has room for one more cable connection point... If the man-shaped pylon is built anything like me, that additional point is way too close to the ground!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    26. Re:In 3000 years.. by xenn · · Score: 2, Informative

      you lose your legs in an accident?

    27. Re:In 3000 years.. by NovaHorizon · · Score: 1

      and charlie chaplin still won't be in the public domain.

    28. Re:In 3000 years.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, we don't know, if mankind still exists in 3000 years, how society looks then and if there is any interest in culture or in history as we know it. I believe that we are getting closer to whats's know under the term 'technological' singularity. No idea, when this will happen, but I rather expect it to happen within the next 100 years than in 3000 years or more.

      Human shaped pylons for electricity lines ... Maybe they'll also get some relgious meaning for some post-human civilisation, who explores their origin and sees us as their creators. ;)

    29. Re:In 3000 years.. by thrawn_aj · · Score: 1

      Even more connection points. I approve =)

    30. Re:In 3000 years.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I don't disagree, you have to keep in mind paper and HD platters won't stick around for 1000 years. Some of our best early information was from clay tablets. When paper came around we lost a great deal due to its fragility.

    31. Re:In 3000 years.. by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      >>All the zodiacs are based upon greek mythology

      There's 1.5 billion Chinese people that would probably argue otherwise.

    32. Re:In 3000 years.. by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      Technicality, Zodiac versus Chinese Zodiac, I shouldn't have used "All"

    33. Re:In 3000 years.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Before the 1800's there really wasn't such a thing as "Archaeologists" - there were "grave robbers" who would break into tombs and sell the valuables but nothing in the interest of preserving history.

      Huh? I read a lot of old (Swedish) books. I have hard to belive that the only books about archeology written in the 17th and 18th century was written in Sweden and that all excavations from that period was concentrated to Sweden, and believe me there was a lot of them, both books and excavations. Of course, some of those books is not as truthfull(+) as I would like and then usually try to inflate the role Sweden played before it became the superpower of Europe, not to mention playing down the historical role of the Geats(*). All in all, most of the "archeologists" (a word not yet in use) tried to make as truthfull statements as possible and those that didn't are by no mean worse, or more frequent, then "bad" archeologists are today.

      (+) Many archeological findings claimed to be made in the area around the Swedish capital was falsified by using relics that had been taken from continental Europe or found in other parts of Sweden.
      (*) Sweden was created when the Swedes and Geats came under one ruler. During the period of the Swedish Empire, Sweden was politically and economically dominated by the Swedes. Unfortunatly the Geats looked better in the history books, taking part in defeating the huns, conquering Rome and being parts of the Norse and Danish Viking fleets et.c. et.c. The only glorious past the Swedes could find was the founding of Russia, they also had some very despicable history to cover up, like the slave trade to continental Europe with slaves from the Baltics and Finland based in Stockholm (there exist no documentation about this trade inside Sweden today, it was all destroyed, all that is left is bookkeeping made and preserved outside Sweden).

  2. What a good idea... by Entropius · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... Terran-shaped pylons! That way you can disguise one in their base until you're ready and then bam! warp in dudes.

    1. Re:What a good idea... by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 2, Funny

      You require more minerals.

      No. Seriously dude, get out into the sunlight more often, get some vitamin D.

    2. Re:What a good idea... by toastar · · Score: 1

      Supply depot shaped pylons would be so imba

    3. Re:What a good idea... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Nonsense. I've been saying for decades that those huge high-tension towers are really aliens scattered across the landscape... well, now we have proof, since they're coming alive!!

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  3. Are you really glad to see me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Or just carrying a lot of voltage on the third phase?

  4. Obligatory: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Must construct additional pylons.

  5. I like them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If we have to have things like high-power lines, we might as well make them as beautiful and mesmerizing as possible. I can't understand why we make so much without giving a nod to the beauty we have the capacity to create. I also like these a LOT more than the winner (http://www.dezeen.com/2009/03/30/high-voltage-transmisison-line-towers-by-arphenotype/), but that's just my opinion.

    1. Re:I like them by natehoy · · Score: 1

      If you ever get down to Orlando, FL, pay close attention to the pylons there. Many of them are Mickey Mouse Ear-shaped.

      Not that I'm a big fan of rampant commercialism, but there are a crapload of shapes that are every bit as practical and structurally sound as the current ones, and require little to no extra materials. At least Disney Inc was being inventive. And I have to imagine the interlocked circles are pretty stable, on the whole.

      Hell, if companies would help pay for the infrastructure, I'd be (vaguely) OK with some of them being in corporate logo shapes. I'd find that no more objectionable than the current eyesores they are, and it'd make some ad money serve some practical purpose.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    2. Re:I like them by unity100 · · Score: 1

      they look too abstract. and unnatural. human pylons were better.

    3. Re:I like them by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      They also look a lot more expensive to build and transport. They are molded as one big piece. Completely impractical.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  6. Yeah, they look cool but.... by Maddog+Batty · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is the same as the gravity powered lamp (http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/02/20/1446256). It is a good idea that looks cool (cool enough to win awards) but has major drawbacks which make it completely impracticable to build.

    Pylons typically have four large legs widely spaced apart for good reasons. Reducing them to two and making them very narrow isn't a good thing (TM). They also typically have 6 arms so as to keep the cost per cable down and each different design has to go through a lot of testing to ensure it can cope with the loads.

    Nice blue sky thinking but an engineer hasn't been anywhere near the plans. If you want to give me an award, I to can come up with a nice pretty picture of a car that runs on one fried egg per 1000 miles. It's a nice sound bite but just as impossible to build.

    --
    wot no sig
    1. Re:Yeah, they look cool but.... by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      I'm not an engineer, so take this with a grain of salt...

      They don't look terribly different than, say, a radio tower -- relatively straight, narrow, and tall, with cables coming off of them to stabilize them.

      But I'm not sure how to deal with the arms -- give them six arms, and it becomes nightmare fuel.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    2. Re:Yeah, they look cool but.... by Bai+jie · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Pylons typically have four large legs widely spaced apart for good reasons.

      No they don't, Pylons typically only have one large Octahedron crystal in which the tip barely touches the ground.

    3. Re:Yeah, they look cool but.... by Anonymusing · · Score: 1

      Pylons typically have four large legs widely spaced apart ... They also typically have 6 arms ...

      Ah, so we should fashion them after a four-legged Buddha? Although, "Centaur Buddha" sounds more like a 90s alt-punk band...

      --
      Liberal? Conservative? Compare perspectives at Left-Right
    4. Re:Yeah, they look cool but.... by cowscows · · Score: 3, Insightful

      These almost certainly wouldn't be impossible to build, in fact they don't look like they'd even be that difficult to engineer. The more practical question is how much more would they cost compared to a more traditional tower, and does society see a value in spending that extra money. Just because something is utilitarian doesn't mean that it shouldn't look nice. While a straightforward steel bridge can certainly have an inherent beauty to it, I'm glad that I see many different designs in my travels. Helps keep the world a more interesting place.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    5. Re:Yeah, they look cool but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reducing them to two and making them very narrow isn't a good thing

      One word: cankles.

    6. Re:Yeah, they look cool but.... by Locke2005 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Pylons typically have four large legs widely spaced apart for good reasons.
      If you look at the pictures, they have lots of guy wires keeping them stable, a system which would work with even a single foot.
      They also typically have 6 arms so as to keep the cost per cable down
      The pictures show 4 attachment points at hands and elbows. Top of head would be an obvious fifth point, and there is no reason the wires can be just as widely spaced as on a traditional pylon.

      The only real drawbacks are these require additional material ti build and additional setup costs, but the net result looks more like art than a boring series of towers.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    7. Re:Yeah, they look cool but.... by Jumperalex · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actaully they have both and it just depends. Here in the States, I see more four-legged power-line structures than I do the single point types. But I have seen them. Anyway the point is, the GP clearly doesn't realize there is more than one way to make a structure that is sturdy.

      --
      If you can't be good, be good at it!
    8. Re:Yeah, they look cool but.... by cgenman · · Score: 1

      The contest winner has 3 legs and 2 arms, +3 additional attachment points. I hate to sound this terrible, but this is Iceland we're talking about, not Southern California. They probably don't need wall-to-wall high-voltage wires.

    9. Re:Yeah, they look cool but.... by DeadboltX · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Problem solved: Just make each pylon a pair of copulating humans. You then get 4 legs, 4 arms, maybe some knees and elbows depending on the varying positions.

    10. Re:Yeah, they look cool but.... by tverbeek · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have it on fairly good authority that structures of this shape are capable of standing upright.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    11. Re:Yeah, they look cool but.... by hey! · · Score: 1

      I don't see the point of speculating about this, because a real structural engineer could give us an authoritative answer should anyone actually want to build some of these. He'd just plug the configuration into some kind of finite element analysis doohickamajiggie and tell you "go ahead" or "forget it" or "overbuild enough to raise your cost estimate by 5x". That at least covers the kinds of issues you raise here.

      It is possible that these things might have unexpected dynamic properties, but that could be checked by prototyping.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    12. Re:Yeah, they look cool but.... by Belial6 · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is how they have been building them around here for the last few decades. Clearly it works.

    13. Re:Yeah, they look cool but.... by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 1

      That whoosh over your head is not the sound of your Wraith start fighters engaging the enemy.....

    14. Re:Yeah, they look cool but.... by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

      The obviously solution is to convert the population to Hinduism and give the figures 6 arms.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    15. Re:Yeah, they look cool but.... by confused+one · · Score: 1

      That's interesting... We seem to have a bunch of single post pylons right outside the building where I sit. Maybe I'm just imaging them...

    16. Re:Yeah, they look cool but.... by hitmark · · Score: 1

      add some fake needles, and you got yourself one monster pine.

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    17. Re:Yeah, they look cool but.... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking the main difficulty will be the excess cost since this adds complexity ("Hey Boss, they sent us an extra arm on this one, but not enough legs!"). Also began to wonder if strategically painting a standardized tower could achieve a similar visual effect.

      That said, it's a clever idea, but I find it annoys my eye. I don't consider the standard towers invasive in lonely places -- but the "human" ones strike me as an intrusive presence, as if artsy-fartsy civilization has suddenly been imposed on the emptiness.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    18. Re:Yeah, they look cool but.... by AP31R0N · · Score: 1

      i wrote to those guys and told them it wasn't gravity powered. Gravity is just the catalyst for the real energy source... whatever the person who lifted the weight had for lunch. Which makes it largely solar powered.

      --
      Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
  7. Wow. Just wow. by marco.antonio.costa · · Score: 0, Redundant

    What a retarded use of human resources.

    --
    Send your spendthrift head of state this
    1. Re:Wow. Just wow. by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What a retarded use of human resources.

      So you've never ever bought something because it looked good? Thank goodness people like you don't have their way all the time. The world would look like Soviet Russia if they did.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    2. Re:Wow. Just wow. by marco.antonio.costa · · Score: 1

      So you've never ever bought something because it looked good? Thank goodness people like you don't have their way all the time. The world would look like Soviet Russia if they did.

      Have you ever bought a frying pan because it looked good?

      A hammer?

      A screwdriver?

      You get the point. :P

      --
      Send your spendthrift head of state this
    3. Re:Wow. Just wow. by sjames · · Score: 1

      How do you figure? It looks like about the same amount of materials for something that was needed anyway. What's so bad about being a little more creative with how you weld the materials together?

    4. Re:Wow. Just wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it the iFryingPan, iHammer, or iScrewdriver? Because only Apple knows how to make great user interfaces.

    5. Re:Wow. Just wow. by Just_Say_Duhhh · · Score: 1

      I dunno, I think she looks kinda hot.

      --
      I need trepanation like I need a hole in the head.
    6. Re:Wow. Just wow. by kevinNCSU · · Score: 1

      Have you ever bought a hammer, frying pan, or screw driver? You think the colors/shape of the handles on those devices are entirely utilitarian in form or do you think just maybe, they might also be made to be aesthetically pleasing? It doesn't matter as much with tools of course, but then you don't have that tool permanently installed where you have to look at it every day and have it affect property values.

    7. Re:Wow. Just wow. by cgenman · · Score: 1

      Have you ever gone to a high-priced resort island like Iceland because it looked good?

    8. Re:Wow. Just wow. by marco.antonio.costa · · Score: 1

      Would you buy a screwdriver with a handle shaped like a sensuous woman?

      And if so, wouldn't you be EMBARASSED to have it in a place where you - and god-forbid, anyone else - might see it?

      I know I would.

      --
      Send your spendthrift head of state this
    9. Re:Wow. Just wow. by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      Actually...yes on all those accounts.

      In pretty much all those cases I prefer the new purchase to match whatever I already own, including looks.

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    10. Re:Wow. Just wow. by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia, fashion picks you!

    11. Re:Wow. Just wow. by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      Have you ever bought a frying pan because it looked good?

      Hell yes. When I'm entertaining a hot chick and cooking a seduction meal for her, I don't want her thinking I live in some sort of student house. My kitchen utensils speak of a bachelor pad that is occupied by a man who has his shit together. And I'm not the only one. Look at the amount of money people pay at Williams & Sonoma for designer toasters, pots, pans, and tea towels.

      A hammer?

      Maybe. If it looks cheap I'm less inclined to buy it. Plus, a certain amount of design effort goes into making them look good these days anyway.

      A screwdriver?

      No, but they all look pretty good these days anyway. They're all designed with a certain amount of aesthetic consideration in mind. My screwdrivers are part of a tool set that I bought, and they all fit together neatly into a decent looking case. I also bought a multi-tool for my bike A because it was light and B because it looked better than the others on offer. If the designer has put a bit of thought into how the product looks then I'm inclined to think that the build quality is going to be of a similar standard.

      You get the point. :P

      I'm not sure if I do.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    12. Re:Wow. Just wow. by Idarubicin · · Score: 1

      Would you buy a screwdriver with a handle shaped like a sensuous woman?

      And if so, wouldn't you be EMBARASSED to have it in a place where you - and god-forbid, anyone else - might see it?

      Clearly, you've never shopped for mud flaps.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    13. Re:Wow. Just wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My thoughts exactly.

      Human pylon: WORST JOB EVAR!!

      Job interview: So how much current can you hold?

  8. missing something? by papabob · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Reading TFA (I know, I know...) I'm not sure if it's a design contest to _actually_ build the thing or simply to draw something nice to sell to a news agency and fill empty time in tv shows.

    BTW, looking at the photos my first thought was "traditional pylons doesn't need chains to maintain verticallity"

    1. Re:missing something? by ArbitraryDescriptor · · Score: 1

      BTW, looking at the photos my first thought was "traditional pylons doesn't need chains to maintain verticallity"

      Non-traditional, but is it unusual? I thought I'd seen transmission towers with guy wires, or at least some looked as though they should have guy wires (narrow base, tapering up and out).

    2. Re:missing something? by vlm · · Score: 1

      Non-traditional, but is it unusual? I thought I'd seen transmission towers with guy wires, or at least some looked as though they should have guy wires (narrow base, tapering up and out).

      Actually, if you examine the pictures, those are more like "girl wires" since these towers seem to have, uh, kind of wide hips and not much on top if you know what I mean. "Honey, does this 16 KV three phase service make my butt look fat?"

      From a structural engineering perspective a phallic symbol would be much simpler and more stable, and from an EE perspective probably less corona discharge. Vaguely water tower shaped. Maybe there are some coastie states where that idea would fly.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    3. Re:missing something? by Idarubicin · · Score: 1

      Non-traditional, but is it unusual? I thought I'd seen transmission towers with guy wires, or at least some looked as though they should have guy wires (narrow base, tapering up and out).

      Yep, guyed transmission pylons are not exactly a new thing. Many two-legged towers are in service today. Balancing on a single point is even relatively common. (One advantage of these towers is less site preparation may be needed. Since the lengths of the guys are adjustable, the location of the pylon doesn't need to be levelled, and a smaller foundation is required.)

      --
      ~Idarubicin
  9. Nightmare Fuel by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wow, and I thought clown dolls were freaky when I was a kid. Can't wait for kids to wake up screaming that the giant electrical skeletons are coming to get them!

  10. Better yet... by b0bby · · Score: 1

    They should just get Disney to subsidize them & build a bunch of these:
    http://atlasobscura.com/place/mickey-pylon

  11. By the Power of GreySkull... by Lensman · · Score: 1

    All they would need now is one holding a sword aloft, and the words will flow from the mouths of geeks everywhere: "I have the Power!!!".... :-)

  12. Weird! by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

    So giant robots will not be scary at all compared with metal towers? What a marvellous idea. The Eiffel tower is due for an anthropomorphic makeover any day now. The colossus of Paris perhaps.

    --
    http://www.acetonestudio.com
    1. Re:Weird! by nbauman · · Score: 1

      Gustav Eiffel already gave his tower an anthropomorphic makeover.
      http://www.uh.edu/engines/statlibskel.jpg

    2. Re:Weird! by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      It's...it's a Transformer!

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
  13. They might be giants by pavon · · Score: 4, Funny

    Note to self, don't invite Don Quixote to Iceland.

    1. Re:They might be giants by cheesecake23 · · Score: 1

      Note to self, don't invite Don Quixote to Iceland.

      As always, xkcd is way ahead of us all.

  14. Do it!! by dwheeler · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If they do the real job effectively, and don't cost too much more, they should do it. In fact, I'd like to see these worldwide. If human-shaped ones don't have enough legs, then animal-shaped ones might be good alternative (dinosaurs? dogs? dragons?).

    Today's pylons do the job, but let's face it, they're ugly. If we have to dot our landscapes with pylons, we should at least make them interesting.

    --
    - David A. Wheeler (see my Secure Programming HOWTO)
  15. And now... by countSudoku() · · Score: 0

    Would you like to buy some Icelandic Honey Pylons? Oh please! We're bally cold and there's nothing but bloody fish to eat!

    --
    This is the NSA, we're gonna geet U h@x0r5! Also, what is a h@x0r5?
  16. What could possibly go wrong? by Afty0r · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I for one welcome our new terrain-conquering giant pylon overlords.

  17. OMG! mod this up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't you people ever play starcraft??

  18. YOU REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PYLONS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently, Iceland does indeed require additional pylons. No word on if they need moar vespene gas, however.

  19. Cool! by ITBurnout · · Score: 1

    Deathrace 2000!

  20. Icelandic Company Designs Human Psylons,,, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    now that would have been worth RTFA.

  21. Re:OMG! mod this up. by Kenoli · · Score: 1

    Must... construct... additional...

    ARRGGHH

  22. Less is more by westlake · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The towers of the George Washington Bridge were originally to be given a faux masonry facing.

    To our great good fortune that never happened:

    "The George Washington Bridge over the Hudson is the most beautiful bridge in the world. Made of cables and steel beams, it gleams in the sky like a reversed arch. It is blessed. It is the only seat of grace in the disordered city. It is painted an aluminum color and, between water and sky, you see nothing but the bent cord supported by two steel towers. When your car moves up the ramp the two towers rise so high that it brings you happiness; their structure is so pure, so resolute, so regular that here, finally, steel architecture seems to laugh. The car reaches an unexpectedly wide apron; the second tower is very far away; innumerable vertical cables, gleaming against the sky, are suspended from the magisterial curve which swings down and then up. The rose-colored towers of New York appear, a vision whose harshness is mitigated by distance." (Le Corbusier, "When the Cathedrals were White")

  23. in a few years by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Funny

    confused hippies will assume the burning man festival has been moved to iceland and multiplied by 1,000. they will proceed to inadvertently bring down the entire country's electrical infrastructure during the namesake ritual of the closing of their festivities. iceland will discover they can successfully drive the hippies back into the sea with the playing of bjork music over loudspeakers. but the smoke from the burning human pylons will result in europe closing down their entire airpace for a week

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:in a few years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what you're saying is that they'll require additional pylons?

  24. 6 arms... or more... by denzacar · · Score: 2, Informative

    Humanoid statues can hold cables with their elbows, shoulders, top of their head, middle of their chest etc.
    Not just with their hands - like real humans.

    And if you think that humanoid pylons are impractical - get a load of these ugly things. No pun intended.
    And then try imagining servicing one of those nightmares.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:6 arms... or more... by xerxesVII · · Score: 1

      Entirely subjective.

      I think those are beautiful. Pain in the ass to service, perhaps, but visually beautiful. The fact that the design varies for longitude and latitude makes them even more appealing.

      --
      "We shall grapple with the ineffable, and see if we may not eff it after all." - Douglas Adams
    2. Re:6 arms... or more... by vlm · · Score: 1

      Humanoid statues can hold cables with their elbows, shoulders, top of their head, middle of their chest etc.
      Not just with their hands - like real humans.

      If you think of all the places that have had piercings, there's quite a few more places to hang an insulator.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    3. Re:6 arms... or more... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I can just imagine what our high winds would do to those... way more surface area to catch and create lift.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    4. Re:6 arms... or more... by Idarubicin · · Score: 1

      And if you think that humanoid pylons are impractical - get a load of these ugly things. [dezeen.com] No pun intended.

      Yep, those are quite something. But they lost me as soon as I read,

      “A parametric code drives the heights in an continuous gradient, which will be manufactured physically through help of milling machines,” says Koering.

      Really? Milling fifty- to hundred-foot tall structures? That sounds hideously costly, compared to the bolt-it-together steel structures currently in use, or even the ones contemplated by the linked story. While quite visually striking, these pylons are constructed of aramid fiber and resin -- not exactly inexpensive or simple to work with. And how well will they cope with lightning strikes?

      --
      ~Idarubicin
  25. Humanity is screwed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They designed human Cylons? Have televised science fiction dramas taught us nothing?? ... oh.

  26. How prestigious! by AhabTheArab · · Score: 1

    Wow, the Boston Society of Architects Unbuilt Architecture. What an honor. What's next? An Academy Award for "Best Unmade Motion Picture".

    1. Re:How prestigious! by vlm · · Score: 1

      An Academy Award for "Best Unmade Motion Picture".

      Alex, What is the Star Wars movies containing Jar Jar Binks?

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    2. Re:How prestigious! by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 1

      Motion Picture Best Left Unmade?

      I think The Spice Girls' Star Wars Halloween Sponge Bob Princess Adventure already won that.

  27. Easter Island Statues by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2, Funny

    Um, has anybody checked if the Easter Island Statues had signs of carrying power cables? That answer might clear up a lot of riddles.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  28. Pylons by js3 · · Score: 1

    you must construct additional pylons!

    --
    did you forget to take your meds?
  29. Irrational fear by realsilly · · Score: 1

    My fear with those human looking pylons is that the electricity will be connected wrong, and in some freak incident, the damn things will come alive and start stepping on people.

    But it's sure would be cool as shit to see that Irrational Fear come to pass also.

    Nevermind me.... I'm silly.

    --
    Life takes interesting turns, but the most interest is when you're off the beaten path.
  30. Economy of scale goes out the window... by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 1

    If you make every pylon different, you lose the ability to mass-produce the component parts. When the time comes to erect them, the assembly crews are dealing with different parts and different drawings each time, so there is no "learning from experience". And each separate design will need to be tested individually for wind resistance, structural integrity, ice loading, etc.

    Yeah, they look cool, but the downsides are numerous, and most likely a project-killer.

    --
    Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
    1. Re:Economy of scale goes out the window... by sjames · · Score: 1

      It doesn't look like they expected to make every pylon different, rather they expect that more than one design will naturally exist to accommodate different needs, much like we have with the purely utilitarian designs.

  31. Re: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We should make them like hentai porn.

  32. But the proposal finally explains... by mike.rimov · · Score: 1

    1 - What all those heads were used for on Easter Island.
    2 - How they moved the heads.

  33. Soylent Pylon by noidentity · · Score: 1

    Det. Thorn: You tell everybody. Listen to me, Hatcher. You've gotta tell them! Soylent Pylon is people! We've gotta stop them somehow!

  34. MOD PARENT FUNNY by unity100 · · Score: 1

    you know it is. quite elaborate.

  35. Well... subjectively... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    Those look like plastic vomit oozing over the remains of an umbrella accident.

    "Shape of each one varying according to its longitude and latitude" is pretentiouspeak for "bigger ones would look different than the small ones or otherwise it would fall down and break into million pieces".
    Meaning that they've even managed to fail their own "adaptability of nature" blurb - each tower would HAVE TO BE uniquely designed and prefabricated.
    So much for adaptability. Or nature.

    And good luck replacing or fixing one in a jiffy next time a volcano decides to erupt and causes earthquakes, floods and your run-of-the-mill volcanic eruptions.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  36. Yeah... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    And just think of all the Japanese tourists coming to see them.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  37. What a waste... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This seems like something best left to the world of Sim City.

  38. Added benefit by PPH · · Score: 1

    They'll scare off the Daleks.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  39. Eiffel Tower by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Why not shape them like the famous and popular Eiffel Tower?.....oh wait

  40. awesomely beautiful by smellsofbikes · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I hope they go ahead with this because it's beautiful, and it's a comparatively inexpensive alteration to existing towers that converts them from a necessary eyesore into something that at least some people will actually enjoy. I'll go back to Iceland again just to see these, if they do get installed.

    . It's also quite an upgrade for their power system. Iceland produces *enormous* amounts of electricity from their hydroelectric plants, so there's always a need for more power lines from the interior, where the reservoirs are located, to the coast, where the aluminum smelters are being built. I was reading a discussion of electrical systems in a small museum in Vik (I believe) where they mentioned that until the 1960's much of Iceland had single-wire power distribution -- not single phase, mind you, but just a single wire, that carried high voltage, and used the earth itself as the current return path. Any building with power outside of the few cities had its own monster variable transformer so the people living there could adjust the in-house voltage to the value they needed, to account for voltage drop along the supply line.

    --
    Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
  41. Pffft by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    They simply couldn't figure a way out of wire-frame preview mode and cooked up a good story. My boss does this all the time.

  42. Burning Man by rwyoder · · Score: 1

    Obviously, Iceland is hoping to host the next one.

  43. Headlines by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1, Informative

    After reading the headline, I was thinking "what an odd use for their excess population".

    --
    Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
  44. Let's take this one step further by Locke2005 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Couldn't each pylon be designed to look like a pole dancer?

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  45. How long would they last? by teh+kurisu · · Score: 1

    I'd love it if they used this design for the Beauly to Denny power line, if only to see how many of them get set on fire. There are two groups of Scots that might do so... those opposed to the visual intrusion of pylons in otherwise unspoilt scenery, and those who got lost on the way to the Wicker Man festival.

    Personally I quite like them. They look like a cross between Rez and Thunderbirds.

  46. Human shaped orange cones? by DrJimbo · · Score: 1

    After getting past the thought of "been there, done that with Battlestar Galactica", my next thought was of the orange cones that are put on roads to guide traffic and are constantly getting run over. They're also getting constantly run over in driver's ed classes. I couldn't imagine why some sick bastard wanted make those cones look like humans unless he really hated highway maintenance workers.

    --
    We don't see the world as it is, we see it as we are.
    -- Anais Nin
  47. Oh God! Oh Jesus Christ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those plyons won't bring back your damned apples!

  48. NOT an icelandic company by bark · · Score: 1

    Choi + Shine is not an Icelandic company! I wonder where the heck the submitter got that. Their website puts their address at

    Choi+Shine Architects office
    358 Tappan St
    Brookline, MA
    02445

  49. I've been a human pylon for ages by PylonHead · · Score: 1

    I should have filed a patent or something.

    --
    # (/.);;
    - : float -> float -> float =
  50. Electricity in ancient Egypt? by Man+Eating+Duck · · Score: 1

    See: "Joke".
    Reference ancient Egypt and the finds regarding electricity.

    The ancient Egyptians performed some impressive feats of engineering (exactly how they went about building the pyramids is still up for debate). They also had good insights in many sciences, but electricity is not part of it.

    Some battery-ish bottles have been found near Baghdad, these were extremely weak and just might have been used for gilding or metal-plating. As for the nutcases who claim that all the "schoolbook experts" are wrong and the Egyptians had what we know as electricity and electric light, well... the nutcases are wrong. See this article for a thorough refutation based on numerous impossibilities with the hypothesis.

    I agree that their stone reliefs will last longer than any computer, though :)

    --
    Are you a grammar Nazi? I'm trying to improve my English; please correct my errors! :)
  51. Exceedingly stupid by gweihir · · Score: 1

    There is a reason pylons are boring: It is extremely hard to come up with a design that actually works, i.e. is resilient under adverse conditions. The current designs are the results of more than a century of experimentation. Deviating from them in such an extreme fashion would require a few decades of testing for each individual design and with several hundred, geographically diverse, instances. Anything less would be inviting frequent catastrophic failure in a piece of very critical infrastructure.

    This was done by designers with not even the slightest clue of how safe engineering works.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  52. Am I the only one who thought .... by ihaveamo · · Score: 1

    "NOT ENOUGH POWER - BUILD MORE PYLONS!". ?? Those sneaky Protoss - Terran shaped pylons won't fool us!!

    1. Re:Am I the only one who thought .... by MakinBacon · · Score: 1

      "NOT ENOUGH POWER - BUILD MORE PYLONS!". ??

      You haven't been playing much Starcraft recently, have you?

  53. Re:OMG! mod this up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You must construct creepier pylons!

  54. Not enough pylons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Our gateway has no power... You must build a pylon nearby so that our forces can come to this world.

  55. Was thinking the exact same thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Entropius, you're my new hero.