Slashdot Mirror


Linux Wall Warts Small On Size, Big On Possibilities

davidmwilliams writes "Every geek and technology lover will undoubtedly have stumbled across online adverts for tiny headless Linux-powered devices that are barely larger than the power point they plug into. What can you actually do with them? Plenty, it seems!"

65 of 316 comments (clear)

  1. oh man by Pojut · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Firewalls, Torrent Slaves, Front end for a "remote desktop" style connection, small traveling computer for a hotel that has a flat screen, etc.

    1. Re:oh man by Kepesk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'd like to see one with MythTV built into it. Plug it into the wall, give it a coax cable in, HDMI and USB out for monitor and keyboard, and off you go. Take your DVR anywhere.

      Sure, the technology isn't quite there to do that cheaply, but it certainly wouldn't be expensive currently to build one that just connects to a wireless network and outputs Hulu.

    2. Re:oh man by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Torrent Slaves

      I wonder ... if somebody made an image with a self-registering Tor relay* that looked at the TCP congestion control state and throttled dynamically ... and then people started dropping $100 on these and plugging them in to random office buildings where a free data jack and power outlet were available - how many of them would still be operating after a couple years?

      * I know you said 'torrent slave', but it gave me the idea

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    3. Re:oh man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And I wonder, if you went into random office buildings and plugged some of these in, programmed to connect out to your master server (through their NAT, etc) sniff traffic, scour the local intranet and file shares and generally do some spying and acting as a jump point for your hacking, how many of them would still be operating after a couple years?

      * I know you said 'tor relay', but it gave me the idea

    4. Re:oh man by commodore64_love · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >>>Torrent Slaves

      Ooops read my mind! It would save a lot of money to have a 5 watt Torrent-downloading plug to download my favorite TV shows,* versus leaving my ~150 watt computer running all the time. Some quick math: 0.140 kilowatt * 24 * 365 * 12 cents per KWh == about 140 dollars saved.

      Okay maybe not a lot of money. In fact: Never mind. I'll just use my laptop to save electricity. ;-)

      *
      * Trivia - 5 watt is the US-enforced maximum wattage allowed on Digital TV converter boxes.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    5. Re:oh man by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2, Funny

      places have ports enabled that are not is use/conspicuous?

      You might need to put a Polycom sticker on it.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    6. Re:oh man by Alamais · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not for long. As predicted, the Cablecos have already started nixing analog 'expanded basic'. As soon as the OTA digital switch was over (and thus their opportunity to claim that "you won't need to switch anything with cable!!!!!!"), they start dropping analog asap. My mom just switched to satellite, since now the only thing she could pick up from Comcast on her (old, non-HD) tv was local channels, and the cost to upgrade to digital made satellite a much better deal.

    7. Re:oh man by JWSmythe · · Score: 2, Informative

      Don't forget your fingerprints on the box, both the virtual ones (like coding practices, notes, and hostnames) and real ones like physical fingerprints on the outside of the box.

          You may have a hard time sniffing for traffic on a good switched network. All you may see is broadcast traffic. If you can gain access to the switch itself, you could set up a monitor port and listen to various things. Open file shares are a bit obvious, but not always useful if they have anything resembling security practices (i.e., password protected shares). A bit of brute force may work wonders, even with just a dictionary file.

          It could result in a waste of a little spy box, or a goldmine for stolen data. Of course, if you use the stolen data, it may (and likely will) come back to haunt you. Best case, you'll end up in civil court. Worse case would be you end up in criminal court with a serious conviction, jail time, and more fines than you'll ever be able to pay. Worst case, you stole from the wrong folks, and your mutilated body is found years later. The coroner's report may read something like "The victim died peacefully, after all his minor extremities were removed with common hand tools, every rib was broken through blunt force trauma, skull fractures were caused by what appeared to be a baseball bat, and then he drowned while wearing cement shoes."

          Hacking is all fun and games, until you end up dead. Those are the cases we rarely hear about, but I wouldn't be too quick to dismiss them as impossible.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    8. Re:oh man by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 3, Funny

      My favorite I once saw was "Process Controller. Touching this will break manufacturing line." And this was *not* at a small scale manufacturing plant.

      /Ended up being a logging server.
      //Someone had a sense of humor

    9. Re:oh man by SethJohnson · · Score: 2, Informative

      I know you're probably aware of this solution, but I'll throw it out there anyway. Several vendors are selling low-power set-top boxes that support torrent downloads to attached or internal media. These run linux and can also deliver 1080p media to your TV from a wide array of file formats.

      I recently purchased the Patriot Box Office for $65 (with rebate) off NewEgg's site. It's not without it's problems, but it performs most of its responsibilities reliably. It also works as a NAS, though without many permissions options.

      I'd get three more of these before I'd waste any money on a walwart linux box. These settop boxes are just as hackable, plus they have hardware video chipsets.

    10. Re:oh man by Blymie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "In US usage, especially colloquial, of is often omitted, as in "I went there a couple times"."

      "Especially colloquial", indeed. From where I sit, this highlights why Wiktionary has failed me at every use. Using this "dictionary" to defend the dropping of "of", is the same as using "Ain't" all over the place, because Wiktionary claims "However, its use is common among all social classes".

      Common among all social classes, my ass. Yes, you see the Trumps (or the people they call peers), using ain't regularly.

      This dictionary is a FAILURE. It will always be a failure, because most of the people editing it, are not capable of proper english usage!

      (and yes, I left "english" lower case on purpose..)

  2. Two Words by 0racle · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hidden Cameras.

    --
    "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
  3. 3 pages? by RevRagnarok · · Score: 5, Informative

    Did it really need 3 pages? Nope.

    --
    I should put something clever here. Maybe someday.
  4. Wall warts? by joeflies · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not a particularly attractive name overall, but I decided to search the web to see if it's in common usage. Turns out that it's only used in reference to AC adapters, not as all-in-one computers. In fact, the first reference to the term as it relates to a mini computer is this very article. So it looks like they're making up their own lingo.

    1. Re:Wall warts? by SnarfQuest · · Score: 3, Insightful

      these devices are the same size and shape as many of the transformers used to power such things as laptops and video games. If you didn't know they were a complete computer, you'd be looking for the device that it was powering. The only difference you can see is that instead of a power cable going to some device, you have a network cable going into a router.

      Since they look like a "wall wart", it isn't that surprising that they get called by the same name. These things are SMALL.

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    2. Re:Wall warts? by iceperson · · Score: 3, Informative

      My google-fu > than yours apparently...
      http://lmgtfy.com/?q=linux+wall+wart

    3. Re:Wall warts? by Monkey-Man2000 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Wall warts are just any unattractive thing that takes up space on you power outlets (ala warts). Big AC adapters are the usual, but I think these will fit the bill if they hang off the wall.

      --
      This post was generated by a Cadre of Uber Monkeys for Monkey-Man2000 (603495).
    4. Re:Wall warts? by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 2, Informative

      Musicians(well, electric instrumentalists) know the term from the AC adapters used to power their effects pedals.

    5. Re:Wall warts? by hellop2 · · Score: 3, Informative

      This has been covered on slashdot before. 1.5 years ago.

      $100 Linux Wall-Wart Now Available

      +4 Informative? More like Uninformative.

      --
      How many more years will slashdot have an off-by-one error on your Score in your profile?
  5. No wireless? by slaxative · · Score: 3, Insightful

    After reading the article I am rather surprised there is no wireless interface. They could have saved one more cable.

    --
    This is not the penguin you're looking for.
  6. What, SheevaPlugs again? by IICV · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Isn't this like the billionth Slashvertizement for SheevaPlugs? They're neat and all, but I think at this point everyone here knows about those things. I'll probably get one if I can ever think of a use for it.

    1. Re:What, SheevaPlugs again? by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2

      Yeah, seriously. Enough!

      OK, they're cool devices. But they've been around for, what, a year+ now? They promised they'd be coming down to the $50 price range "real soon now"; likewise with newer versions. I'm not seeing them, are you?

      Meh. $100, is it? I think I'll pick up oh, any number of low-end components for that price which will still do the job.

      $100 with eSATA or two NICs? Then we'll talk. ARM manufacturers really need to get on the ball if they don't want to have their lunch eaten by the Atom z6xx SoCs. No, they won't operate at 5 watts, but they'll be close enough.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  7. SheevaPlug by codepunk · · Score: 4, Funny

    SheevaPlug, I don't know about the rest of you but that name brings visions to my mind that has nothing to do with computers.

    --


    Got Code?
    1. Re:SheevaPlug by Maarx · · Score: 3, Funny

      SheevaPlug, I don't know about the rest of you but that name brings visions to my mind that has nothing to do with computers.

      Thanks for ruining my lunch.

  8. HomePlug / Power line ethernet by Maddog+Batty · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Does anybody know of a similar device that includes Homeplug so you can do away with the ethernet connection as well?

    --
    wot no sig
    1. Re:HomePlug / Power line ethernet by Anon+E.+Muss · · Score: 2, Informative

      Does anybody know of a similar device that includes Homeplug?

      No, unfortunately. There also aren't any plug computers that can run off POE (Power Over Ethernet).

      Being small and cheap is a key part of plug computers appeal. There are many technologies that would go well with a plug (e.g. WiFi, Homeplug, POE, USB, ESATA, RS232, RS422, I2C, etc.), but including them all would be size/cost prohibitive. The manufacturers have to make a judgment call about where the "sweet spot" lies. The result is often a "one size fits nobody" situation, where the plug is 90% right for your application, but the missing 10% is a deal killer. Building a custom plug is impractical at low volumes.

      P.S. I bought a Shevaplug last year. I had no idea what I'd do with it, but it sounded cool. Honestly, I still don't know what to do with it. Luckily I can afford to blow ~$100.

      --
      The key sequence to access my Slashdot bookmark in Firefox is Alt-B-S. I don't believe this is a coincidence.
  9. Needs a new name by bsDaemon · · Score: 2, Funny

    First, I misread this as "linux walmart" and thought it was some sort of "app store" deal. Closer inspection reveals the truth is far more disturbing. They should probably pick a new name... or dress them up like 'Shrek' and market them towards kids or something.

  10. Ug. Linux. No thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'll wait for Apple to release the iPlug.

  11. Cheap NAS boxes are better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Plug computers are widely overrated. For the same price you can get a cheap home oriented NAS box like http://www.lacie.com/us/products/product.htm?pid=11384 with 1TB of storage that can be reflashed http://lacie.nas-central.org/wiki/Main_Page to do whatever you want.

    1. Re:Cheap NAS boxes are better by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 5, Informative

      Not really.

      The biggest advantage these have over cheap NAS boxes is bang for the buck in terms of horsepower. The Lacie NAS appliances you mention come with 400 Mhz processors at 16 MB of RAM.

      The SheevaPlug and GuruPlug each come with a 512 MB of RAM and 1.2Ghz processor. Also, GuruPlug has 802.11g WiFi capability in addition to the wired Ethernet connectivity.

      And I say this as an owner of a reflashed Linksys NAS 200, which not only serves files, but also serves as a print server for my network, a capability that Cisco/Linksys doesn't include in the box.

    2. Re:Cheap NAS boxes are better by Sancho · · Score: 3, Informative

      Stay away from Guruplug. They're sold with two gigabit NICs, but if you use them both at gig speeds, the Guruplugs overheat. Heck, mine exhibits the same syptoms (gets very hot and reboots) using one NIC at gig speeds while also maxing out the eSATA connection.

      Originally, Globalscale had this to say:
      http://plugcomputer.org/plugforum/index.php?topic=1735.msg12392#msg12392

      Now, they say that the plugs aren't designed for this kind of use, and that they will sell "Professional Upgrade Kits" to let you use the devices in this way. Worse, to me, they're essentially rewriting history here. The forum post accurately quotes the original announcement dated 7/17/2010. The page now only shows an announcement 7/5/2010 mentioning what they are "designed" for and about the sale of the upgrade kits.

      Frankly, I'm shocked that the units were sold with 2x1Gb NICs, but weren't tested using them and that they're considered "not designed to be used together." It's asinine that they would pull this crap.

    3. Re:Cheap NAS boxes are better by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's the GuruPlug Plus. The standard GuruPlug includes only 1 Gb NIC.

      The "professional upgrade kits" are just a microfan and a wiring harness. You could just as easily mod the GuruPlug Plus with a 3rd party fan and drilling a few holes in the case, etc.

      Or just lock one of the NICs at 100 Mb, as the announcement suggests, if you need 2 NICs and don't need them both to be GigE, as in the case of building a router. Or if you're building an iSCSI target and need the 2 GigE ports for speed by using channel bonding, then just add the fan.

      I don't really see the big deal except that I do find Globalscale's announcement change to be a bit deceptive, as the original announcement promised that they would be adding the professional upgrade kit to all future GuruPlug Plus units that started shipping as of August and now they've reneged on that deal and covertly altered the notice.

    4. Re:Cheap NAS boxes are better by Sancho · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's the GuruPlug Plus. The standard GuruPlug includes only 1 Gb NIC.

      I'm standing by my statement to stay away--actually, from anything they produce. How much testing could they have done if they didn't notice this issue? What's the point of having a "plus" version that upgrades the slower NIC to Gb if you can't use them both together?

      I'm not much of a hardware hacker or maker--I'm a software guy. So I'm not really excited about modding it myself with a third-party fan. I'd much rather have the professional upgrade kit--which is 3-4 months away according to the "new" press release. Worse, I'm outside of the return period, so I can't even wash my hands of this and send them back.

      I know I'm grousing a lot, but I really see this as highly deceptive. They sell a "plus" version that doesn't work, promise a fix, then sell you a fix long after the return period has elapsed for a big chunk of your customers.

    5. Re:Cheap NAS boxes are better by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 2, Informative

      To clarify, the Standard only has 1 NIC, not one 1 Gb NIC + 1 100 MB NIC.

      I still wouldn't hold Globalscale's (who is a retailer/distributor for the devices, they are not the device's manufacturer) against the hardware device itself. I'd certainly say that the manufacturer didn't do adequate testing, but do understand that at around $100, these are the cheapest things available with this much horsepower. I know, I've been researching small embedded general-purpose Linux devices for about 3 months now, because I think the GuruPlug would be an ideal candidate for mesh networking.

  12. Be careful buying Guruplugs from Globalscale by Zerth · · Score: 2, Informative

    They're still working out the bugs and they take months to ship(bill your credit card right away though). They said 2-3 months to go for a hardware fix for the Guruplug+'s overheating problem when using GigE, other than "use them at 10/100".

    Sheevaplugs have gotten better though, the capacitors don't pop anymore, but both of them benefit from removing the 5v power and putting it in it's own box. Which doesn't entirely defeat the point, but it is a little aggravating. Still, unless you like paying now for flaky hardware from a company that has zero customer support and enjoy resoldering your power supply, buy one of the more commercial ones.

    PS, I rather like mine, I'm just lowering your expectations so you might like what you get, if you still buy from Globalscale.

  13. Don't forget Puppy by commodore64_love · · Score: 2, Informative

    From the article:

    Linux does the job admirably, with even the most full-featured distro like Debian being able to slot into the flash memory provided you're economical with what you install (scrap Gnome and KDE for starters!). Or Damn Small Linux and other distros of its ilk will do the job just fine too.

    They always forget Puppy, which is a heck of a lot easier to use than DSL. Puppy can fit in as little as 32 megabytes with a full desktop even a kid could use.

    .....and 512Mb DDR2 RAM.

    Woah. I feel like I stepped into the Nintendo and Sega wars. 512 megabits == 64 megabytes in normal human parlance. i.e Twice as much as I have in my old Windows98 laptop and equal to what was in my OS 9 mac.

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    1. Re:Don't forget Puppy by bhima · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think there is an ARM port for puppy. So you'd be setting yourself up for a fair bit of work.

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
  14. One (Other) Word: ( +1, Helpful ) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Botnets bitchez.

    Yours In Astrakhan,
    Kilgore Trout

    P.S.: Bush-Gingrich 2012 !

  15. A small business owner's viewpoint by GMFTatsujin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm in the design phase of opening a consulting business (non-IT related) to run out of my home. Marvell's plugs look very attractive to me as a right-sized server for my modest needs. Email, web, file storage (especially with a RAID NAS or via DropBox) -- the wall wart looks just right for that kind of workload. I've worked in IT with big, fancy servers, and I just don't need them.

    The alternative is to lease something like a Linode. I like the way Linode does business, but five months of their low-power service would buy a SheevaPlug. All I'm missing then is a static IP and the always-up cloudiness that Linode provides. The choices are tempting.

    1. Re:A small business owner's viewpoint by gad_zuki! · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sheeva plug as a server? Is this a joke? No raid or redundancy and these things are infamous for blowing caps, overheating, and other hardware issues tells me you need to start doing testing before publicly proclaiming your business plan.

      Oh and those "big ol fancy servers" no one needs? You're paying for raid, hardware warranty, same/next day parts, dual power supplies, support, proper engineering, etc. If your company came to me with one of those toys as a "solution" you'd be walking out of my office with that sheeva plug shoved in your own "plug."

    2. Re:A small business owner's viewpoint by Anrego · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Totally agree..

      Not saying a small business (especially if not IT based) needs an "enterprise" level server.. but running web and email off one of these things sounds very dubious.

      Probably better off with a hosted solution.. most ISPs won't let you run a server on a standard plan .. and though you tend to get away with it.. I wouldn't have "hope my ISP ignores this" in my business plan. As soon as you start paying for a business ISP account you may as well pay the excess and get all the redundancy and proper data center perks.

  16. Re:Ug. Linux. No thanks. by Abstrackt · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'll wait for Apple to release the iPlug.

    I swear I saw one of those at a sex shop once.

    --
    They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
  17. Wuh oh! by decipher_saint · · Score: 2, Funny

    You got wall warts from using a SheevaPlug, you better get some cream for that right away...

    Gah, I grossed myself out... pleh!

    --
    crazy dynamite monkey
  18. Re:Two (other) Words by mmcuh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    With infinite programming capabilities for encryption of recordings, offsite backups, and other sexy things you can think of. Hook it up to a small sensor that triggers the recording whenever a door opens and it can get really interesting. Computer, webcam, sensor, all fitting in your jacket pocket to install at home when you go on vacation, in the hotel room when you leave for a day trip, at the office when you leave for the weekend etc.

  19. Did it really need 1 page? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I actually RTFA because I'm interested in these things... And found it a total waste of time. Let me summarize everything in it:

    The small and cheap, low-power computer that you plug directly into the wall is actually a small and cheap, low-power computer. It has USB 2.0 (as can be clearly seen in all pictures of the device). You can install linux on it and do stuff that such a linux computer could obviously be used at: File storage, run FTP server, run apache, use it as SSH gateway... That's about the list of ideas mentioned in TFA.

    Did anyone here actually find new information (okay, 3rd page has a bit of technical specs. Nothing unexpected, nothing that would have taken more than 2 minutes to google) or ideas in the article? If so, what were they? If I missed something essential, my bad... But this seems to contain zero information. Especially to someone who already has interest to such devices (obviously, if you've never heard of these "wall warts" ((Okay, I hadn't heard that name being used for these devices before)) before, everything there was new. Though I still believe that running ftp server or ssh gateway would have been about the first things you would have thought of yourself, too).

    1. Re:Did it really need 1 page? by skids · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not to mention half the applications for something of this size are equally well filled by a reflashed OpenWRT wifi access point you can fish out of a dumpster for free. You don't need 512M of flash/ram to run an ssh gateway.

    2. Re:Did it really need 1 page? by SQLGuru · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My best ideas are to pair them with some old LCD screens and do something like this: http://www.panic.com/blog/2010/03/the-panic-status-board/

    3. Re:Did it really need 1 page? by ncc74656 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not to mention half the applications for something of this size are equally well filled by a reflashed OpenWRT wifi access point you can fish out of a dumpster for free. You don't need 512M of flash/ram to run an ssh gateway.

      I'm kinda wishing I had more than the 16 MB (IIRC) that's in my WRT54GL, though...blocklists implemented as iptables rules need a bit more RAM than that. The model with a couple of GigE ports looks like it'd make a decent router.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    4. Re:Did it really need 1 page? by skids · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, OK, since there's so much interest: hit a dormitory or college-catering apartment complex dumpster when the kids are moving out for the summer. Thar's gold in them thar hills!

      Seriously, though, you folks have a hard time coming by old APs for free? I've accumulated 3 without even trying.

  20. Re:Ug. Linux. No thanks. by Anaerin · · Score: 2, Informative

    You're probably thinking of the OhMiBod. Really. OhMiBod. I swear you can't make this stuff up. (And thanks to Engadget for informing me of this particular device's existence, before you ask how I know about it).

  21. What indeed? by Zouden · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "What can you actually do with them? Plenty, it seems!"

    Not really. The article spent 3 pages to say that you could use it as a file server with an external hard drive or... a web server. That's it?

    This reads more like a slashvertisement for a product with no real purpose. Yes, it's great that it's cheap and runs linux, but if you need an external hard drive to get any real use out of it, what's the point in making it so small? Just make it the size of a caddy.

    --
    "A week in the lab saves an hour in the library"
  22. They call those ideas? by proxima · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The article mentions internet router, file storage, and print server. Really? That's the best you can do?

    A decent dd-wrt compatible router is pretty inexpensive, and will give you a few port switch and a decent set of wireless antennas. Most people aren't so constrained on space that they can't tuck one away somewhere. They often include the capability of handling USB hard drives as well for file or print sharing. Many printers these days have built in ethernet or wireless to handle their own print serving capability.

    Devices of this size do have possibilities, but the article doesn't mention anything really interesting. Apple has had its airport express base station for a while, and while it's mostly an ordinary wireless N router, it does provide music sharing via airtunes which works well if you happen to use the Apple/iTunes ecosystem for music.

    So what do you do with a tiny Linux box? mpd or a squeezebox client would provide music sharing (though you can get Logitech's own radio for $100-$150, and it comes complete with a screen and controls). It would either need a good quality sound chip on it (unlikely) or a decent USB sound card (added expense, though).

    What would be really neat is if they had an HDMI port for a thin client. Maybe an install of Android and its browser to turn a smaller LCD monitor into a little internet browsing box in otherwise cramped spaces (e.g. kitchen). Or have something powered off 12V and use it as the basis for a car computer.

    Even with the current offerings, I'm sure there are much more interesting ideas that people could come up with (probably involving more significant hacking) than a file or print server.

    --
    "The universe seems neither benign nor hostile, merely indifferent." --Carl Sagan
    1. Re:They call those ideas? by Fjandr · · Score: 2, Informative

      You've got a router that has 512MB of flash and 512MB RAM for $20? Almost all consumer-grade routers choke on anything more than the most non-demanding tasks. Hell, a good portion of them choke if you actually try to run full-speed traffic on all of their ports in more than small bursts.

  23. Or a cheap router . . . by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 5, Informative

    Plug computers are widely overrated. For the same price you can get a cheap home oriented NAS box like http://www.lacie.com/us/products/product.htm?pid=11384 with 1TB of storage that can be reflashed http://lacie.nas-central.org/wiki/Main_Page to do whatever you want.

    If you don't need the storage as much as you need the always-on/low power processing, you can get a WRT54-based router that can be relfashed with Tomato or DD-WRT, then you can install optware. The Asus WL-500G has enough guts to run Asterisk while still doing its primary purpose. Or maybe a cvs, svn or other repository. All for maybe half the price of the Sheevaplug. And much more available. Of course, it doesn't have the wall wart form factor, for good or bad. And it's not quite as discreet, if that's a requirement.

    --
    I am not a crackpot.
    1. Re:Or a cheap router . . . by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2, Informative

      You could also get an ALIX board... they're comparable in cost and offer a lot more networking functionality; they're x86 boards and have much more processor and RAM than anything near the WRT54 stuff. They'll run a small to medium network's gateway device (running pfSense) with several VPNs, even - no problem.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  24. Less useful than initially expected. by bored · · Score: 5, Informative

    I own a few of these devices. My first one has a eSATA port that I connected to a 5 bay sata port expander. That has been my network DHCP/DDNS/fileserver/printspooler/VPN endpoint/etc for a while now. The problem is that its hard to justify when compared with the recent firewall/wireless devices that have USB ports for exactly this reason. Sure I can get ~60MB/sec, absolutely outrunning anything attached via USB, but it cost about 3x as much to get there compared with just purchasing a $70 netgear and plugging in a dual drive USB raid array.

    Plus, these things _REQUIRE_ hacking to get them to do a lot of stuff. I wasted days of my life trying to figure out why the JTAG interfaces didn't work as documented, or trying to boot kernels that didn't come with the devices. Or even consistently boot off USB instead of internal flash. This would be fine, except they are hardly open devices. Much of the time wasted turns out to be endless reverse engineering closed portions of the device. Marvell publishes a fair amount of the documentation for them, but I quickly found, time and time again, that the information I needed wasn't available.

    So, In the end, for low level stuff things. The AVR butterfly an similar devices are far better hacking platforms, and on the higher end its hard to ignore the atom nettops or dozens of very nice single board computers that are far more powerful for not much more money.

    1. Re:Less useful than initially expected. by jabjoe · · Score: 2, Informative

      They don't require hacking, it's optional. Unless you count sshing into a Ubuntu box to configure it as hacking...... I moved mine from Ubuntu to Debian, and the guide for doing so is pretty clear: http://www.cyrius.com/debian/kirkwood/sheevaplug/ I had a small issue, probably of my own making, but I solved it and learnt more about uBoot in the process. I don't what problems you had with the mini USB JTAG, again it's clearly documented. It is much much much more powerful then the 8bit AVR butterfly. A much better hack project to point people at is BeagleBoard (which now can run XBMC).

  25. Re:Here's an idea by hufman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have a Sheevaplug, and the problem I've encountered is the lack of hardware FPU. The article even recommends using them as an SSH server, and from my experience, it makes a poor fit in that role. You can SSH into it decently fast, but the lack of a hardware math unit adds around 5-10 seconds of delay when sshing from it to another computer. Your renderfarm idea would fail miserably, since 3D rendering is all about math, especially with angles and other floating-point usages. Maaaybe I could see a Quake server. Depending on how much math the server has to do.

  26. What most of them are really are used for by Locke2005 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Plug in the USB cable that came with your phone and use it to charge up your phone.

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  27. Selling my SheevaPlugs by Andrew+Ford · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have had 4 SheevaPlugs. Two died on me, one was replaced and the other I had to buy a replacement PSU. They are touted as plugging into a wall socket, but if you do that they are pretty precarious, and if you plug them in via a power cable, then they don't stack nicely. I prefer the PC Engines Alix boards (http://pcengines.ch/alix.htm) - based on the AMD Georde with 255MB of memory they seem to be as fast as a SheevaPlug (I read somewhere that the Kirkwood processor only has a 16-bit data bus whereas the Geode has a 32-bit data bus). The Alix systems have a nice Aluminium case and run cool and sweetly - a German company nrg-systems.de, sells cases that will take a 2.5" hard disk, which draws an extra 2 Watts above the 8-10 Watts that the base system uses. I have 3 Alix systems: one as my firewall, one running my Asterisk PBX and the other running Exim, Dovecot, NFS, Samba, etc. The three systems together draw less than 30 Watts, replacing a pair of 150 Watt tower systems that ran 24x7 saving enough on my electricity bill to pay for themselves in just over a year.

  28. Using these now by jimmyswimmy · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm using these devices now for R&D work. We started with the Sheeva plug, now the Guru plug. The devices are okay. If you are looking for a COTS general purpose computer, the price, size and capability cannot be beaten. If you have more specific needs, particularly consumer needs where you can give up size as a constraint, there are many other cheaper alternatives.

    That said, if you open up one of these devices, the thickness of the "wall wart" is half power supply, and a lot of the space is allocated to thermal design (heat sink, space for airflow). If you don't need their (crappy) power supply, replace it with a 5 V DC-DC converter and you can run it in your car or in your custom R&D device like we are. Very few low cost (small, low power) GigE devices exist now. These are just about the only ones. Downside is that there is NO support (oh, I'm sorry, "community support"... not okay for corporate use). You have to go it alone if you want to do something that nobody else has done.

    Globalscale (makers of the Sheeva/Guru plugs) are supposed to be releasing a GuruPlug "Display" device which has an HDMI port. It sounds cool, but based on my experiences buying the "Server" version on spec, wait until it is not just vaporware. They said that the "Server" version would include some things that aren't actually pinned out (so if you want, say, an I2C interface, you have to be prepared to go digging around on the circuit board, then you might have to deal with building a custom kernel, then you might have to pray on your knees before the dark god of fab, etc.).

    And forget about using this as a portable device. Power draw is low but it still sucks down the juice if you're using it do actually do anything. And the ARM5 core does not, as I recall, support floating point operations, so they're emulated (at reduced speed). And last but not least you're going to be cross-compiling everything, or hooking up a hard drive so you can install a precompiled gcc and making less-common things from source.

    All in all, are these show-stoppers? No. I'm still using a few of these for various jobs, like one which is going to go get pelted around in the ocean, and they're great if you can withstand the negatives. I have $200 worth of batteries to run it and a custom kernel build (and a separate board for the I2C interface, thanks a lot you jerks at Globalscale)... took a while to get going but it mostly does the job.

    --

    Just my $0.55 (US inflation, 1774-2008, for $0.02)
  29. Headless nethworked mpd client by Roobles · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I would be really interested in a plug computer with decent audio output. All it would need is a minimal Linux OS with Pulseaudio installed and an open network sink configured. It would allow me to define it as an output in my central mpd server and toggle attached speakers on and off with a mpd client. I've already done this with desktops, but I would love to have speakers and a tiny computer in every major room, so I can just decide what room(s) I want to be playing music in at any given moment.

  30. Power consumption monitoring by fyngyrz · · Score: 2, Informative

    In conjunction with some powered USB hubs, some cheap A/D->USB devices ($50 per 8 channels), and some hacked-together AC current probes, a power monitoring system for every line into your breaker box.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  31. Re:Or a cheap handheld by White+Flame · · Score: 2, Informative

    My N800 only draws 5W max at the plug. IIRC my "ancient" Jornada 720 does as well. I've been planning to repurpose my N800 as an always-on wireless server once I get a replacement handheld. You can get last-gen handhelds in a similar price range as these plug computers.

  32. Re:Let me fix that for you by Sloppy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Comcast, FiOS, DirecTV, and DISH all need access cards.

    I don't consider any of those to be relevant comparisons. The benchmark for the basic level of functionality is analog cable. Remember the words "cable ready?" Remember when you could plug the cable into anything -- a TV, a Tivo Series 1, a PCI tuner card -- and it Just Worked? I sure do. I paid Comcast literally thousands of dollars for that over the course of many years. It was a proven business model, and it's the reason that Comcast didn't close their doors decades ago.

    Apparently some bean counter looked at all that money reliably coming in, month after month, year after year, and decided, "We need to do something about this. Can we use the switch to digital as some sort of excuse to get paying customers to go away?"

    What should people switch to?

    Piracy, until they offer the basic level of functionality that we've come to expect. I didn't pirate before, and I won't pirate after. I can't believe you asked that, because it's such an easy question. You can even verify that's it's probably the best answer, by the usual tools of ethics.

    "What if everyone pirated TV until the basic level of service we expect were offered?" Answer: a service that Just Works would appear. You'd plug your cable into the back of your TV or HDHomeRun or whatever, and there are the TV shows that you paid for, hassle-free.

    "What if not enough people pirate TV until the basic level of service we expect is offered?" Answer: the TV companies will never get serious and professional. People will continue paying for something that would have made everyone laugh with derision just ten years ago.

    It's pretty obvious that it's the best thing for everyone to do.

    There are plenty of amateurs out there who are willing to go through the inconvenience of repairing content to make it Just-Works-Ready, but I think the situation is not quite ideal. If a professional organization were to offer that, and use a better distribution tech than bittorrent (imagine some kind of multicast technology which could be received by some sort of standardized "tuner") it would flourish. How much would I pay for

    • works with any device without needless resolution loss
    • time-shiftable
    • no legal risks
    • no missing a few episodes of The Daily Show last week because some amateur took a break
    • vastly improved performance (bittorrent works, but it also kind of sucks)

    as well as other conveniences, feeding right into my MythTV? Shit, I'd pay $50/month for that. And I can prove it: I did it for many years (except with a Tivo1 instead of Myth), as did millions of other people. We all know this works. Comcast could crush their pirate competitors in a heartbeat if they just put their mind to it, and they wouldn't even have to underbid them. Until then, though, piracy is the only game in town. Nobody else offers it at any price.

    I'm not saying it would be free of consequences to the TV delivery company. Whatever TV company is able to come out with Just-Works service first, is going to have the same problem that cable companies had in times past: income. The poor bastards are going to have to hire accountants to keep track of all the money, pay more taxes, etc. It won't be easy, but that's the price of having stockholders. I know some cable exec is muttering, "fucking stockholders, all they want is a growing base of paying customers. Why can't they leave us alone?" to which I respond: Nobody held a gun to your head and said you had to work at a for-profit business. If money repels you so much, you can always join the Peace Corps.

    And since when does BitTorrent work for live sports or live news?

    (I get live news from over-the-air local channels, but I guess that's not universal.) Bittorrent won't get you those things right now, and yet it is The Way to eventually get them. Anyone who wants live news and sports to come back, is going to have to take a long-term strategic view. Pirate today, working realtime TV tomorrow.

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.