Slashdot Mirror


Will Amazon Put Advertisements In eBooks?

destinyland writes "A book editor at Houghton Mifflin argues ebook advertising is 'coming soon to a book near you.' (Paywalled unless you go through Google.) Amazon has filed a patent for advertisements on the Kindle, and the book editor joins with a business professor in the Wall Street Journal to make the case for advertisements in ebooks. Book sales haven't increased over the last decade, and profits are being squeezed even lower by ebooks. According to another industry analyst, Amazon is being pressured to make ebook sales more profitable for publishers, partly because Apple offers them more lucrative terms in Apple's iBookstore. One technology blog notes that Amazon's preference seems to be keeping book prices low, and wonders whether consumers would accept advertising if it meant that new ebooks were then free. Meanwhile, Ralph Lauren has confused the issue even more by publishing a 'shoppable' children's storybook online, prompting a fierce reaction from one blog: 'I hope it's the last. Books are one of the last refuges in our world from the constant cry by advertisers to spend money and fill our lives with unnecessary things.'"

34 of 226 comments (clear)

  1. Let the Reader/Consumer Decide If It Works by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    (Paywalled unless you go through Google.)

    I apologize for not RTFA but I was brought to the same paywall whether I went through Google or not. Is it some sort of lottery?

    'I hope it's the last. Books are one of the last refuges in our world from the constant cry by advertisers to spend money and fill our lives with unnecessary things.'

    I would just like to say that I welcome both options. Reader A can pay a high premium and enjoy the original novel as the author intended it to be enjoyed and Reader B can pay little or nothing and try to read Fahrenheit 451 with moving advertisements marketing gallons of premium kerosene at wholesale prices (BUY BUY BUY!). And you know what? I'm really not opposed to this. Maybe the authors are and maybe it offends the your *ism but as long as they keep the old model as an option who cares? I haven't noticed a decline in my ability to purchase paperbacks and hardcovers following the advent of e-readers so why should I fear e-readers installing advertisements into books?

    Meanwhile, Ralph Lauren has confused the issue even more by publishing a 'shoppable' children's storybook online ...

    It's a 'storybook' except that the children are real children acting in front of a green screen that has superimposed images of chidren's-bookish scenes done up in a flash video. Congratulations, the "fierce" blog has done little more than positively re-enforce this marketing maneuver because I just watched an advertisement for children's clothes!

    I also am a little bit annoyed that we complain about the RIAA and MPAA as clinging to an old business model and then as book publishers and retailers try something new (or are even rumored to try something new) we hop all over it and denounce it as a crime against humanity. And yet daily I read news sites laden with advertisements. The very site I write this comment on transfers my comments to you, the reader, alongside political advertisements trying to raise your ire about "ObamaCare" or "Barack the Magic Negro." Yes, yes, there are tools like AdBlock, NoScript and Flash blockers specifically designed to circumvent this but to the average reader of Slashdot, this is reality.

    And despite the horror of advertising, here we are ...

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Let the Reader/Consumer Decide If It Works by danking · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Did you read the comment? It specifically said that it would be okay if they leave option A and option B open to let people decide. That way you will be able to continue having your ad-free books and others, who wish not to pay or pay a lower fee can read their ad-laden books.

    2. Re:Let the Reader/Consumer Decide If It Works by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 3, Insightful

      More likely, if this goes through, we will be asked to pay more for books with advertising, and never be given to option to get the books without. Do you really think the publishers are interested in what is best for you or anyone other than themselves?

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    3. Re:Let the Reader/Consumer Decide If It Works by butterflysrage · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The publishers are interested in making big piles of money

      exactly... now, what gives you more money:

      option a:
      Sell book X with adds for $1, and without for $10. Ad mone makes $9 per book, average net for each book sold: $10

      option b:
      only sell book X with adds for $10 because the only three other e-book retailers are doing the same. Ad money still makes $9 per book, average net is $19.

      Why cut your net in nearly half? It is the same reason why your cellphone company can get away with charging 25c a text, because every other cellphone company is charging 25c a text, not because it actually costs that much to do.

      It will start with the next huge blockbuster book, think the next harry potter or twilight... it will ONLY come in full price, ad-saturated books, and because everyone wants one, they will pay it. Next big book, maybe not as popular, same thing, then another, and another... within a few years, every book will be full price + ads.

      --
      the preceding post was not spell checked... suck it.
    4. Re:Let the Reader/Consumer Decide If It Works by tophermeyer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You've made two unspoken assumptions in coming up with your examples.

      One is that Option A and Option B will both sell X number of ebooks. There is no guarantee that both options will sell the same number of ebooks. IMO Option B will lead to more sales of ad-free paper books.

      Your other assumption is that the market is full of mindless consumers with no sense of the real value of the product beyond their desire for it. If the inconvenience of the advertisements outweighs the value the consumer draws out of the book then they will not buy it.

      Cell phone companies have gotten away with charging ridiculous rates for text messages because they've been able to convince people that texts are fundamentally different from other data. Average Joe consumer is willing to pay an exorbitant rate because he believes the telcos when they say that texts are unique and expensive. Book readers will not be so gullible. Mainly because they already have a sense that a new hardcover is worth about $25USD and has been for some time.

  2. Hah, more profits for publishers by Dunbal · · Score: 3, Interesting

    According to another industry analyst, Amazon is being pressured to make ebook sales more profitable for publishers, partly because Apple offers them more lucrative terms in Apple's iBookstore.

          This is completely the opposite of the way a "free market" is supposed to behave. Enjoy your oligopolies, America. I just take heart in the fact that if a Kindle can read it, so can any other device. I will wait for the ad-blocking readers before spending one dime on one.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    1. Re:Hah, more profits for publishers by genghisjahn · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You don't have to spend a dime to get Kindle device. You get get the free software for the Mac, PC, Blackberry, Android or iPhone. Of course you'll have to pay for content, but the "device" won't cost you anything extra. There are plenty of free books. Try it..see what you think.

      --
      Sorry about the mess.
    2. Re:Hah, more profits for publishers by BlackCreek · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Howzat? Apple is offering more competitive terms to publishers

      Define competitive. So they don't have to compete by price? Having all books at $10-$15?

      Amazon also has a deal where publishers get 70% of the pie. But in that case the price range of the books is set lower.

      In any case, this is not a Free market, not as far as the readers are concerned:
      http://www.techradar.com/news/portable-devices/other-devices/apple-and-amazon-slammed-for-e-book-pricing-707275?src=rss&attr=all

  3. Get the fuck outta here. by Pojut · · Score: 4, Insightful

    $9.99 is already WAY too much for an eBook. Why the need for advertising? ::sigh:: I guess it's a good thing that the only ebooks I put on my nook are either released for free through creative commons, or are now considered public works (or borrowed from our local library). I absolutely love my nook, but no freakin' way am I paying $9.99 for an eBook when I can pay $4.99-$6.99 for a paperback.

    1. Re:Get the fuck outta here. by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 2, Funny

      $9.99 is already WAY too much for an eBook. Why the need for advertising?

      Greed. You should look it up in one of Amazon's eBook dictionary offerings ... it's on the page immediately following Snuggles' teddy bear hawking fabric softener.

    2. Re:Get the fuck outta here. by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I guess it's a good thing that the only ebooks I put on my nook are either released for free through creative commons, or are now considered public works

      Hear hear. Project Gutenberg has been the source of all of my eBooks -- I've really been enjoying reading through Jules Verne, HG Wells, Dante, Don Quixote, and all sorts of classics that have been on my list for years.

      There's so much stuff out there that's really good and now freely available that it's mind-boggling. Yeah for Project Gutenberg and their work!!

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    3. Re:Get the fuck outta here. by Pojut · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I get a LOT of the stuff I read from Project Gutenburg as well. I usually donate anywhere from $10-$20 per paycheck to them, depending on how much I've downloaded and read in the past couple of weeks.

      $9.99 per ebook? No freakin' way. Donations to a project whose purpose is making classic works available for future generations? Absolutely.

    4. Re:Get the fuck outta here. by Pojut · · Score: 4, Informative

      Can you borrow eBooks from libraries now?

      Yup yup! It generally uses ePub, which my nook accepts natively. To my knoweledge, most ereaders out there now can read ePub as well.

    5. Re:Get the fuck outta here. by Pojut · · Score: 2, Informative

      Probably true. This crowd would say "Cervantes? Why is Mexican beer on this list?"

      Or, "Why are you talking about a Soul Calibur character?"

  4. Old ads. by gweeks · · Score: 3, Informative

    Books have had advertisements in them for a long time. Magazines too. Usually the book advertisements were for more books, but the advertisements in magazines could be for anything.

    A guitar lessons ad from a 1930 Astounding Stories.
    http://ia311203.us.archive.org/2/items/Astounding_Stories_of_Super_Science_1930/asf193001006a.png

    1. Re:Old ads. by rotide · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ads in books were always at the beginning or end of the book, not in the middle of a chapter/paragraph.

    2. Re:Old ads. by batquux · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I didn't look too hard, but I didn't see details on how the ads would be placed. I doubt we'll be looking at, "Her heart was pounding as she unlatched the door and BUY VIAGRA!"

  5. "options" by butterflysrage · · Score: 5, Insightful

    aye, there's the rub... will we have options?

    Do we have the option to get our cable TV without comercials? there are a few pay on-demand channels, but as a general rule, no.
    Broadcast radio? no
    Magizines? no

    Think like a distributer... why charge less for the version with ads in them when you can charge full price AND get the advertising money and make it the only version offered. If I were a heartless corp, I would offer the two versions, then when the next big hit comes out only offer it with ads at full price, then slowly increase the number of ad-only books till that was all I offered in about 5 years or so.

    --
    the preceding post was not spell checked... suck it.
    1. Re:"options" by pushing-robot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Do we have the option to get our cable TV without comercials? there are a few pay on-demand channels, but as a general rule, no.

      DVDs? iTunes? Netflix?

      Broadcast radio? no

      CDs? iTunes? Spotify?

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    2. Re:"options" by GiveBenADollar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Part of the variety we see on cable TV is due to the advertising. Without ads a lot of networks would not have the funding to put on the shows we enjoy. With books though this doesn't quite apply. There are a lot of crappy books that already do get published, and I don't see the quality going up with ad revenue. The cost of producing a book is relatively low compared to producing a TV show. Optimally ads in e-books would allow the price to decrease possibly opening up the world to truly free ebooks, but in reality it would probably mean a new standard where all books have ads and still cost nearly the same. With ads appearing on everything these days it makes me wonder what will be the last product we purchase? You can't subsidize the price of everything with advertisements without actually selling something in the end.

    3. Re:"options" by butterflysrage · · Score: 2

      DVDs? iTunes? Netflix?
      not cable, and when was the last time you bought a dvd without a wad of ads at the start (some they wont let you skip)?

      CDs? iTunes? Spotify?
      not broadcast, and both the brick&morter and the online stores get money from the ads they pelt you with while you are there.

      If the whole "free market" kumbiya actually held true with a small selection of providers, why do we not have comercial-less channels? or more ad-free pay/contribute webpages? because people realize they can have their cake and eat it too... you will pay full price for your DVD and they get the ad money on top.

      --
      the preceding post was not spell checked... suck it.
  6. Dreams by DIplomatic · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Leela: Didn't you have ads in the 21st century?"

    Fry: Well sure, but not in our dreams. Only on TV and radio, and in magazines, and movies, and at ball games... and on buses and milk cartons and t-shirts, and bananas and written on the sky. But not in dreams, no siree.

  7. Re:How will this be used? by MBGMorden · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If they're doing it with the free books that they're truly giving away, then sure. If they're inserting ads into the freely available public domain books? No thanks, I'll keep looking for a service that doesn't want to bombard me with ads.

    --
    "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
  8. I am opposed to it by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why am I opposed to it? Simple: it means more proprietary eBooks and more DRM, and of course, more marketing firms tracking more aspects of our lives. They are not going to allow libre software to render eBooks if they want to shove advertisements down out throats; after all, we could just remove the advertising from libre software. I want to be in control of my books, I do not want Amazon to be in control; did we not learn our lesson with the memory hole scandal?

    As for the tracking, well, what if you want to read a book about explosives? What if that tips off the FBI, and they come to your house demanding to know why you are reading about bombs? Do you really think that the marketing firms are going to keep their databases secret from the government? Do you remember when the PATRIOT act was passed, and librarians publicly denounced the clause about handing library records over to the government, for the exact same reasons?

    Technology is supposed to be improving our lives. Why, then, are we accepting uses of it that do not improve our lives and only serve the interests of publishing and marketing companies?

    --
    Palm trees and 8
  9. Huh? by mcgrew · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Book sales haven't increased over the last decade, and profits are being squeezed even lower by ebooks

    That makes no sense at all. Ebooks cost the same as paper books, yet there's no transportation, storage, inventory, or other costs associated with publishing them. How could ebooks be bringing profits down?

    How stupid do these people think we are, anyway?

    1. Re:Huh? by swillden · · Score: 5, Informative

      Book sales haven't increased over the last decade, and profits are being squeezed even lower by ebooks

      That makes no sense at all. Ebooks cost the same as paper books, yet there's no transportation, storage, inventory, or other costs associated with publishing them. How could ebooks be bringing profits down?

      Baen, a publishing house that specializes in fantasy and sci-fi, mostly with a militaristic bent, says that they've found that e-books significantly increase profits, even though they sell their (DRM-free) e-books for substantially less than they sell dead-tree versions.

      That, obviously, is exactly what logic would tell you. Nice to see there are some publishers who are honest.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  10. Advertising of yesteryear by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Advertising today is far more intrusive than advertising of 50 years ago. Yes, books have generally included advertisements for more books by the author or publishers, but when you talk about eBook advertising, you are talking about an entirely different ball game. Will the ads report back on what you read? Probably, and they will claim it is only for giving you more relevant advertisements. Will the ads get inserted into random places in the middle of the book? Probably, though they will claim that the places advertisements are displayed are chosen so as not to interfere with your enjoyment (e.g. not in the middle of an exciting section of the story). Will the ads be animated? Probably.

    Nobody needs a patent to put old-style advertisements in eBooks. You do not need proprietary software to do it. These ads will not be the same as the ads you are used to seeing in books.

    --
    Palm trees and 8
  11. Depends on how it's done by Chelloveck · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It all depends on how it's done. Advertising in books is not a new thing; many paperbacks have a few pages at the back devoted to ads for other books by the publisher, or sometimes for things like book clubs. And though I haven't seen one in a while, I remember some paperbacks having a bound-in cardstock insert. If ads are limited to this sort of thing, they probably won't be a problem. They're usually relevant to the reader's interest and they're easily skippable. Where I do see a problem is if ads are done like the promos on a DVD -- Pop in the book, and have to sit through three minutes of advertising before you get to read it.

    Still, the only reason why this would work is because of proprietary formats. If ebooks were published using open standards (yay, epub!) someone would just publish a reader which skips the advertisements -- just like you can get DVD players which skip straight over the "mandatory" front-matter on a DVD.

    I'll just keep supporting Baen. Their whole catalog, available in open, non-DRM formats, for paperback prices. Even if they were to start including ads, they'd be easy to rip out of the HTML if they got to be obnoxious.

    --
    Chelloveck
    I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
  12. NYTimes ebook pricing rundown by PhrostyMcByte · · Score: 2, Informative

    NYTimes gives a decent rundown of what goes in to ebook pricing, showing that they make about as much profit on a $10 ebook as they do on a $26 hardcover.

    They don't give pricing on paperbacks, but going off the numbers they give I'd guess a $10 ebook will give them around double the profit that a $7 mass-market paperback does.

    The full article goes on to say the reason for obscenely high ebook prices is quite simple: publishers are set up for dead tree books right now. They could face problems scaling down their current model too quickly, so they're biding time and slowing down ebook adoption by increasing prices.

  13. Re:I've seen lots of adverts for similar books in by dwillden · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I agree, as long as the ads stay similarly confined. However today's advertisers are going to want product placement within the books, and when you hit that product, up will pop a video ad that you can't skip. Or the next page will be the ad.

    Can I get a pop-up blocker for my Nook?

    That's the kind of advertising I think most of us fear. The "Hey you might also like these books" ads currently found in the back of many old and new books are fine. But can the advertisers, publishers and sellers fight the temptation to fully leverage the advertising potential of these modern multi-media capable readers?

    --
    I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
  14. Luke 18:22 by The+Wookie · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Now when Jesus heard these things, he said unto him, Yet lackest thou one thing: sell all that thou hast, and distribute unto the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come, follow me."
    Want to "sell all that thou has" really quickly? Try eBay!

  15. Confusing and Fallacious Comparisons by eldavojohn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Do we have the option to get our cable TV without comercials? there are a few pay on-demand channels, but as a general rule, no.

    HBO? Cinemax? Showtime? And why are you comparing books -- a single finite length of words -- to a streaming service that continually offers new and different content? Wouldn't it be better to compare books to DVDs? Your comparison of a 24/7 service that provides semi-unique programming versus a book smacks of an "apples to oranges" comparison.

    Broadcast radio? no

    NPR? XM Radio? If they could sell you subscriptions to FM and AM bands, I bet they would (similar to HBO/SHOW/CINE). Again, try comparing books to CDs instead of a 24/7 service of semi-unique programming. No advertisements on CDs.

    Magizines? no

    There are specialty magazines that don't have advertisements. It just turns out that people are used to magazines and newspapers having advertisements so they use this to subsidize the cost. Just like television used these same advertisements to pay for costs, it seems we are used to this and will accept it largely. I highly doubt it will be the same with books, albums and movies. I subscribe to Specialten and it has no advertisements. The subscription price is also outrageous. I think people put magazines in the "service" category and accept advertisements with services. This isn't always the case as ISPs have suffered from trying to put advertisements into failed DNS request redirects.

    Think like a distributer... why charge less for the version with ads in them when you can charge full price AND get the advertising money and make it the only version offered. If I were a heartless corp, I would offer the two versions, then when the next big hit comes out only offer it with ads at full price, then slowly increase the number of ad-only books till that was all I offered in about 5 years or so.

    The simple answer to that is to think like the consumer. Why should I could keep paying full price and suffer through advertisements, I know that they are supposed to reduce the cost unless I've been living in a cave on Mars during the advent of the internet? I have faith in the market in this one and speculate books -- both physical and digital -- will remain mostly advertisement free as most albums and movies have.

    If the Kindle provides me a service to access a vast array of copyrighted books for free or cheaply, I would expect that to change though and would assume advertising would be necessary to mitigate the costs.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Confusing and Fallacious Comparisons by butterflysrage · · Score: 2, Insightful

      let me tell you a story... a story of a little text message. This little message, let's call him Bill, Bill was a happy little string of 1's and 0's. Back a few years ago, Bill could get anywhere he wanted for just 10 cents! it was a wonderful time, all three of the cellphone carriers had the same fees so Bill didn't care where he was going for his time.

      But, one day carrier A decided that Bill was getting too much of a free ride and ramped up the price to 15 cents. Now Bill was sad, he didn't think he was that fat, so for a while he hung out with the other two carriers, but soon they saw just how much more money carrier A was making those times that Bill had to use them and rose their prices to 15 cents too... now it didn't matter where Bill went, he had to pay the higher fee.

      Well, a couple years later, the carriers once again raised their prices to 20 cents, then 25 cents, first one would raise their prices and for a while Bill could avoid the increased fees by going to the other carriers but soon they too would match the highest cost carrier.

      Now, Bill has to pay 25c to go anywhere, and another 10c once he gets there. The cost it takes to go places hasn't changed, but because one carrier could get that ammount out of Bill, they all raised their prices to match.

      The moral of the story is: free market only works when the sellers give the customers the choice to drive the market. If there is no choice, or all choices are rendered equally bad, free market falls flat on it's ass.

      --
      the preceding post was not spell checked... suck it.
  16. To answer the question.... by mark-t · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yes.

    Will the ads be unskippable?

    Also, yes.

    Will it annoy some people? Yes.

    Will enough consumers keep buying them that the people who try boycotting won't influence them one jot? Yes.