Slashdot Mirror


The Moon Is Shrinking Like a Wrinkled Apple

astroengine writes "New observations by NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter have uncovered a number of previously unknown, recently formed 'lobate scarps' — raised cliffs about 9 meters high and several kilometers long — over the lunar surface. These scarps form along thrust faults where compression forces the moon's crust to rise. Up until now it was thought these lobate scarps only occurred around the lunar equator, but the high resolution LRO imagery suggests they are ubiquitous, regardless of latitude. As the moon is geologically inactive, what could be creating these features? It would appear the moon's surface is acting like the skin of an apple surrounding the shrinking, dehydrated flesh of the fruit; the lunar crust (skin) is wrinkling as the body of the moon (the flesh) shrinks due to cooling contraction inside the moon's core."

31 of 116 comments (clear)

  1. The analogy is all wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    This more like the aging of a round of cheese.

    1. Re:The analogy is all wrong by 2.7182 · · Score: 4, Funny

      "That's no moon - it's an aging round of cheese."

      "An aging round of cheese? No one could make an aging round ..... wait a minute...Chewie quick, get out the crackers..."

    2. Re:The analogy is all wrong by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh, I think it was Gouda nuff...

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    3. Re:The analogy is all wrong by FiloEleven · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't Brie silly, the Tyning was all off.

  2. Amazing by Ardeaem · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's amazing that can happen over the span of just 6,000 years.

  3. It's just by JustOK · · Score: 4, Funny

    it's just shrinkage cuz it's cold in space. Happens to every moon, doesn't it?

    --
    rewriting history since 2109
    1. Re:It's just by capo_dei_capi · · Score: 2, Funny

      And here I thought there are no women on the internet...

  4. Nuke it by Loomismeister · · Score: 2, Funny

    The only way to guarantee our safety is to nuke it to ashes before anything unexpected or bad happens. Plus everyone will receive free apple pie from the sky.

    1. Re:Nuke it by dimuziom · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's like the inverse of "nuke the site from orbit, it's the only way to be sure." Well played.

    2. Re:Nuke it by anaesthetica · · Score: 2, Informative

      Make sure to nuke it when it's a full moon, otherwise we might not get the whole thing.

  5. Al Gore says.. by al3k · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's lunar cooling!!

    1. Re:Al Gore says.. by bwayne314 · · Score: 2, Funny

      hes super-cereal guys!

    2. Re:Al Gore says.. by WoRLoKKeD · · Score: 2, Funny

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but the last time the Luna Wolves did a major attack, didn't we end up with a galaxy-crushing war on our hands?

      --
      Immolation is the sincerest form of flattery.
  6. teehee by Pojut · · Score: 2, Funny

    Frylock: "What happened to your body, man?"
    Meatwad: "Well, it's obvious isn't it? Thermal expansion."
    Frylock: "No it's not thermal expansion. I know what thermal expansion is."
    Meatwad: "Okay, fine. I'm sure that you do. Let's see, how can I explain this without blowing your mind?"
    Frylock: "Oh yes, please. Dumb it down for me."
    Meatwad: "Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle tells us that at a specific curvature of space, knowledge can be transferred into energy."
    Frylock: "Heisenberg's Uncert-"
    Meatwad: "Or...and this is key now...matter."
    Frylock: "No it does not!"
    Meatwad: "Well, some people struggle with Heisenberg. Look! Here's a toy! It goes up and down on a string, doesn't that look like fun?"
    Frylock: "Get that thing out of my face!"
    Meatwad: "Why don't you go take that into the other room, while the adults are doing important research here."
    Frylock: "Oh, I'm sorry professor. I didn't realize that knowledge could also transform you into an arrogant ass."

  7. Wrinkled Apple by Inda · · Score: 5, Funny

    All this Apple bashing on Slashdot is doing my head in. Can't you just give it a rest for a single day?

    I'm so angry. Cancel my subscription. I'm done here.

    --
    This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
  8. Tides? by egburr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My first thought was couldn't this be more of a tidal effect than due to shrinking? After all, look at what the orbiting mass of the moon does to our oceans. Wouldn't the mass of the earth have a similar effect on the moon? Even if it is tide-locked so the same face always faces the earth, surely there's some slight wobble to that that would cause stress.

    --

    Edward Burr
    Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having a peeing section in a swimming pool.
    1. Re:Tides? by Peach+Rings · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hur dur, except that's exactly what was surprising about finding the scarping places other than the lunar equator.

    2. Re:Tides? by Froze · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think the idea is that tidal distortions would be almost exclusively limited to the equatorial regions, this appears to be radially isomorphic, indicating that it is not the result of tidal stress.

      --
      -- The morphemes of your disquisition are ascertainable, but they have eschewed an ambit of transpicuous exposition.
    3. Re:Tides? by ewskau · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The article does not mention this at all, but if the moon is shrinking then its rotational period must be getting shorter (angular momentum). There does not seem to be an indication that the period of the moon is decreasing, suggesting its either too small of an effect, not there, or not being looked for.

    4. Re:Tides? by mea37 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Interesting point. However, I think tidal locking makes it a little more complicated than that.

      I'm not sure what happens when a tidally locked satelite's diameter gradually changes, but given that tidal locking is an equalibrium state it seems reasonable to suspect that the tidal lock is preserved.

      If so, then as the moon's rotation would naturally tend to speed up, the Earth would pull back on it. This would reduce the increase in rotation, but to preserve angular momentum it would also have to increase the orbital period - meaning the moon would move to a lower orbit with both its period of orbit and its period of rotation slightly reduced.

    5. Re:Tides? by osu-neko · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This would reduce the increase in rotation, but to preserve angular momentum it would also have to increase the orbital period - meaning the moon would move to a lower orbit with both its period of orbit and its period of rotation slightly reduced.

      You were right before the dash: it will increase the orbital period, not reduce it as you said (contradicting yourself) after the dash. This will push the moon into a higher orbit, not a lower one. And indeed, the moon is moving 38mm further away every year, although this is primarily due to the same effect slowing the Earth's rotation rather than the Moon's.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
  9. Nah... by davev2.0 · · Score: 2, Funny

    It is just a side effect of my lunar mining operations.

  10. So it's the next Apple product by microbee · · Score: 2, Funny

    iMoon, Wrinkle Different

  11. Geologically inactive? by Hatta · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That the moon is undergoing these kinds of changes shows that the moon is geologically active. There may be no convection going on in its core, but this is still geological activity.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    1. Re:Geologically inactive? by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 2, Informative

      That the moon is undergoing these kinds of changes shows that the moon is geologically active. There may be no convection going on in its core, but this is still geological activity.

      It shows that there was geo-activity, not that it is currently geoactive.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
  12. Shrinking like the skin of an apple by RNLockwood · · Score: 2, Funny

    OMG, in a few thousand millennia the man in the moon will look like Ronald Reagan!

    --
    Nate
  13. Well duh. by sootman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Of course the moon is shrinking like an old apple. Someone left it out sitting in the sun.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  14. Re:In this manner.... by mortonda · · Score: 3, Funny

    Only it's not quite as old....

  15. It gets old ... by PPH · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... it gets wrinkled.

    Pretty soon, it starts yelling at the kids to stay off its lawn.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  16. Because it's a weather balloon by ObitMan · · Score: 2, Funny

    It amazes me that so many allegedly "educated" people have fallen so quickly and so hard for a fraudulent fabrication of such laughable proportions. The very idea that a gigantic ball of rock happens to orbit our planet, showing itself in neat, four-week cycles -- with the same side facing us all the time -- is ludicrous. Furthermore, it is an insult to common sense and a damnable affront to intellectual honesty and integrity. That people actually believe it is evidence that the liberals have wrested the last vestiges of control of our public school system from decent, God-fearing Americans.

    Documentaries such as Enemy of the State have accurately portrayed the elaborate, byzantine network of surveillance satellites that the liberals have sent into space to spy on law-abiding Americans. Equipped with technology developed by Handgun Control, Inc., these satellites have the ability to detect firearms from hundreds of kilometers up. That's right, neighbors .. the next time you're out in the backyard exercising your Second Amendment rights, the liberals will see it! These satellites are sensitive enough to tell the difference between a Colt .45 and a .38 Special! And when they detect you with a firearm, their computers cross-reference the address to figure out your name, and then an enormous database housed at Berkeley is updated with information about you.

    Of course, this all works fine during the day, but what about at night? Even the liberals can't control the rotation of the Earth to prevent nightfall from setting in (only Joshua was able to ask for that particular favor!) That's where the "moon" comes in. Powered by nuclear reactors, the "moon" is nothing more than an enormous balloon, emitting trillions of candlepower of gun-revealing light. Piloted by key members of the liberal community, the "moon" is strategically moved across the country, pointing out those who dare to make use of their God-given rights at night!

    Yes, I know this probably sounds paranoid and preposterous, but consider this. Despite what the revisionist historians tell you, there is no mention of the "moon" anywhere in literature or historical documents -- anywhere -- before 1950. That is when it was initially launched. When President Josef Kennedy, at the State of the Union address, proclaimed "We choose to go to the moon", he may as well have said "We choose to go to the weather balloon." The subsequent faking of a "moon" landing on national TV was the first step in a long history of the erosion of our constitutional rights by leftists in this country. No longer can we hide from our government when the sun goes down.

    --
    Who run Barter Town?
  17. Similar to early theories of Earth geology by penguinchris · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I would like to point out that before tectonics was relatively well understood and accepted (this only happened in the late 1960's), among the various models proposed to explain geological structures on the earth such as mountain belts was this exact idea.

    So personally, as someone interested in the history of the field of geology (and a geologist myself), I think this is really pretty awesome. Whoever came up with this idea before really had a great idea - I can't recall when it was but it was likely mid-late 1800's, so too bad he's not still around to see that his theory was plausible.

    It was understood well before the 1960's that this couldn't explain the earth's structures - it was not a seriously considered theory for very long for several reasons - but at least the idea is sound.

    And to comment on those who are saying that this proves the moon is geologically active, I think this is a pedantic point which depends on how you define "geologically active", and that's the kind of thing that has an obvious simple answer to start with but then gets complex when you have situations like this.

    As a geologist I would still define the moon as being inactive. Active to me would imply influences besides simply gravity (although gravity is of course a major driving force in earth-type tectonics, it's not the only factor). If you subdivide the earth into active and inactive areas, even the inactive areas will occasionally have things like earthquakes happen, due to intra-plate stresses or whatever. But you won't get volcanic activity or major tectonic activity in those areas, just like you won't on the moon.