Slashdot Mirror


Neal Stephenson Unveils His Digital Novel Platform

pickens writes "The NY Times reports that Neal Stephenson's company Subutai has released the first installment of Stephenson's new novel, Mongoliad, about the Mongol invasion of Europe, using what it calls the PULP platform for creating digital novels. The core of the experience is still a text novel, but authors can add additional material like background articles, images, music, and video and there are also social features that allow readers to create their own profiles, earn badges for activity on the site or in the application, and interact with other readers. Stephenson says the material is an extension of what many science fiction and fantasy novels already offer. 'I can remember reading Dune for the first time, and I started by reading the glossary,' Stephenson says. 'Any book that had that kind of extra stuff in it was always hugely fascinating to me.' Jeremy Bornstein says Subutai is experimenting with a new model for publishing books and says the traditional model of paying for content may not hold up when the content can 'be canned and sent around to your friends for free,' but that people will hopefully still pay for content if 'the experience is so much more rich, so much more involving.'"

157 comments

  1. No thanks by spiffmastercow · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The price point is too high, the author's last few works have not been up to his previous standard, and leisure reading at my computer is simply not possible.

    1. Re:No thanks by Whalou · · Score: 1

      10$ a year is too much? That's less than the cost of going to see one movie.

      --
      English is not this .sig mother tongue...
    2. Re:No thanks by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      It doesn't clarify if the price is for just the Mongoliad, or access to all books on the site. If it is a subscription based system, you would suspect you could read everything they have, at which point it's reasonable, especially if they regularly add additional content to books already written.

    3. Re:No thanks by Zed+Pobre · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Leisure reading on wireless-equipped tablets is becoming popular, however. I'm doing all of my reading nowadays either on a PDA or at my computer. The number of people reading on personal electronics is increasing quite nicely.

      Personally, though, I have difficulty with the notion of paying much for a book I can't pull out of my archive and re-read later, loan to a friend, fix typos in, or reorganize to my taste. This site looks like a 'read-only-while-subscribed' service. If they don't allow archiving to ePub, then it has no value to me.

    4. Re:No thanks by badboy_tw2002 · · Score: 4, Funny

      If only we had a way of taking everyone's 60 lb 5 foot high towers and making them "on the go". "On the go" computing! Has a nice ring to it. One day soon (doesn't it always seem like the cool stuff is 5-10 years out) I think we'll have computers in smaller formats, ones dedicated for things such as this. I'm envisioning something in the form factor of a legal pad or something, or a large book if you need a keyboard. Oh well - at least I can get paged now and respond from the nearest convenient pay phone instead of always hovering around a phone for important calls. What'll they think of next!

    5. Re:No thanks by polle404 · · Score: 1

      If I can't read a copy offline, say in transit somewhere, It's just another website to me.
      I applaud the underlying idea, but it's just too restricted.

      --

      ~men are from earth. women are from earth. deal with it.~
    6. Re:No thanks by Hatta · · Score: 1

      leisure reading at my computer is simply not possible.

      Why? What's wrong with your computer?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    7. Re:No thanks by spiffmastercow · · Score: 1

      It reminds me of work, and slashdot.

    8. Re:No thanks by spiffmastercow · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So you're saying I should buy a $500 iPad and pay $10/year to read a website novel that I might not even like?

    9. Re:No thanks by emkyooess · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Buy access per item. Down with subscriptions!

    10. Re:No thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      >10$ a year is too much? That's less than the cost of going to see one movie.

      $10/year isn't bad, but that's $200 to be able to review/reread the book over the next 20 years is. I like his books, while definitely different from the pulpy Snow Crash/Diamond Age, the new novels can be challenging (Anathem was definately a slow starter). Its an interesting idea, and Neal's books more than any other really push me to explore some of the concepts (Operations of banking systems in pre-WWII Asia, birth of financial markets, role of religion in royal succession, etc),

      What he's proposing is really a whole new thing, more of a book/TV show hybrid. I have reservations (I prefer paper hardcovers, can't imagine reading that much on my iPod Touch, I hate waiting for the next chapter to be released because I want to go cover to cover as fast as possible), but see some possibilities (I might be willing to spring for a Kindle/iPad for this, a ready community reminds me of the fun around Babylon 5, discussing the series & episode around the water cooler the next day). There are a bunch of unknowns (what do I get for $10/year, just this years chapters, other book projects? Is the book fully written, or are they writing chapters each week, meaning its not really edited the same as a novel which can be written out of order, revised to resolve plot holes, etc, will they edit chapters that are already written beyond fixing typos because they can?

    11. Re:No thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's saying you should already own a smartphone. What decade are you in?

    12. Re:No thanks by Lumpy · · Score: 0

      in case you missed it....

      There have been these "ebook" thingies that are very rare and obscure you may not have heard of them

      It seems that so many people are buying these things in secret that companies like Amazon.com have suddenly started selling more ebooks than hardcover books.

      I know they are incredibly new and radical that your personal teletype has not spit the news about them out yet... hopefully you can take the next autogyro to the city and see for yourself at the Worlds Fair how wonderful these magical devices are and how most people find they are easy to read on.

      it's a miracle of the Steam age!

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    13. Re:No thanks by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      or your $100 kindle

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    14. Re:No thanks by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      the author's last few works have not been up to his previous standard

      You mean he's done something different from his cyberpunk days? OH NOES!

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    15. Re:No thanks by emkyooess · · Score: 1

      For me, his best stuff was actually non-cyberpunk. Zodiac, Interface, The Cobweb, Cryptonomicon...

    16. Re:No thanks by spiffmastercow · · Score: 1

      It's not the setting that bugs me, it's the verbosity. The Baroque Cycle was a good read, but about 1500 pages too long. I couldn't even motivate myself to start on Anathem. His early works were actually a bit too terse, though.. Cryptonomicon was was the perfect balance in terms of wordiness.

    17. Re:No thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're saying I should buy a $500 iPad and pay $10/year to read a website novel that I might not even like?

      So you're saying I should buy a $30,000 car and pay $3/gallon to drive it?

    18. Re:No thanks by spiffmastercow · · Score: 1

      So you're saying I should buy a $500 iPad and pay $10/year to read a website novel that I might not even like?

      So you're saying I should buy a $30,000 car and pay $3/gallon to drive it?

      Well, if you want to stay true to the analogy, it's more like paying $30,000 for a car, $3/gal to drive it, and there's only one road in existence.

    19. Re:No thanks by Ephemeriis · · Score: 1

      So you're saying I should buy a $500 iPad and pay $10/year to read a website novel that I might not even like?

      You don't need an iPad. You can get a kindle or nook for less than $200. A very large number of people are using laptops as their main computer these days. Or you could get a netbook. Hell, most cell phones have passable web browsers.

      And $10/year is nothing to complain about. Most paperbacks sell for roughly $7. Anything more than a few hundred pages of paper will cost you more than that.

      --
      "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
    20. Re:No thanks by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not the setting that bugs me, it's the verbosity. The Baroque Cycle was a good read, but about 1500 pages too long.

      It wouldn't be baroque if he didn't overdo it :)

      The first few hundred pages of Anathem were on his website, I got to the end of that sample and went to buy the hardcover the next day. It's a brick, but it's a good brick. Like he said, he's a fan of Dune, and us Dune fans love our books big and wordy.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    21. Re:No thanks by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For me, his best stuff was actually non-cyberpunk. Zodiac, Interface, The Cobweb, Cryptonomicon...

      Zodiac is the one I use to introduce him to people. Not too big, not too weird, but 100% awesome.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    22. Re:No thanks by spiffmastercow · · Score: 1

      $10/year isn't bad, except I re-read books intermittently. I'll read a book, shelve it for a few years, and re-read it when there's nothing new that peaks my interest. Under this model, I'm paying $10 essentially every time I read it. Also, Kindles can't handle rich media, and they're still overpriced (and the black on dark grey text looks horrible). Reading a web site on my iPhone is a masochistic endeavor. Call me a luddite if you must, but I prefer paper.

    23. Re:No thanks by spiffmastercow · · Score: 1

      Funny.. I'm a Dune fan, but I'm not a fan of excessive wordiness.. Then again, some of the Dune books were hard to get through. Dune Messiah bored the crap out of me. God Emperor was probably my favorite, but it was hard to read at times. Everything his son wrote is awful.

    24. Re:No thanks by Ephemeriis · · Score: 3, Insightful

      $10/year isn't bad, except I re-read books intermittently. I'll read a book, shelve it for a few years, and re-read it when there's nothing new that peaks my interest. Under this model, I'm paying $10 essentially every time I read it. Also, Kindles can't handle rich media, and they're still overpriced (and the black on dark grey text looks horrible). Reading a web site on my iPhone is a masochistic endeavor. Call me a luddite if you must, but I prefer paper.

      I guess the question is what, exactly, are you paying for?

      If you just want to be able to re-read the book again, you can probably download it for future reference. It's a web page. Just grab the HTML (if there isn't an epub download offered).

      If you want the whole social media/supplemental content thing... Well, yes, you'd need to pay for that again. But that content will have changed. That's the whole point - to make the novel more dynamic and involved than a pile of printed pages. If you wanted to read the latest edition of a book you'd previously purchased, you'd probably have to pay for that again as well.

      No, the kindle can't handle rich media... But neither can paper. Again, what is it that you want?

      If you want the whole social media/supplemental content thing - use a computer. A netbook, a laptop, a desktop, whatever. If you want a printed paper analog, use a kindle or a nook or print the thing out.

      --
      "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
    25. Re:No thanks by hedwards · · Score: 3, Funny

      You know what they say, if it's not Baroque don't fix it.

    26. Re:No thanks by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Let's see...
      I have around six hundred books, with an average purchase price of $20, and on average I keep a book for 10 years (most much longer, but some fall apart quickly or better editions come out), so my TCO is around $1200 per year.

      If I were to pay $10 per year per book, six hundred books would be $6000 per year.

      So yes, that's damn expensive.

    27. Re:No thanks by Fred+IV · · Score: 1, Insightful

      > $10/year isn't bad, but that's $200 to be able to review/reread the book over the next 20 years is.

      Exactly...and what happens if the business model doesn't work out and the platform goes offline ten years from now? At that point you would be out $100 in subscription charges with nothing more to show for it than your memory of experiencing the content.

      I'd rather just buy the hardback and be able to enjoy it whenever and however I choose to...something that I've done for all of Stephenson's books following Snow Crash.

    28. Re:No thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never even bothered to start those behemoths, but... now that he's making his books as long as he likes, has he managed to write an ending to one? That would be refreshing.

    29. Re:No thanks by bsdaemonaut · · Score: 1

      Depends how you define rich media then I guess, the only thing the kindle can't do is video. The contrast complaints are much overhyped, its no worse than a newspaper. Some newsprint is perhaps slightly lighter, but the Kindle's darker fonts make the comparison pretty valid. My experience is only with the 2nd generation Kindle of course, the others are supposed to be improved.

    30. Re:No thanks by spiffmastercow · · Score: 1

      And if newspaper contrast didn't bother my eyes, you might have a point (though actually the Kindle is quite a bit worse than that). The bar is set at the level of a high quality matte-finished bleached page, with crisp black text. If these devices can't even manage that, then I don't see any reason to even consider them. And that's assuming I didn't have to pay $100-200 up front just for the privilege of using it.

    31. Re:No thanks by eddy+the+lip · · Score: 5, Informative

      Except you don't have to keep subscribing to read what's already written. You keep that, DRM free. The subscription is for continued new content.

      --

      This is the voice of World Control. I bring you Peace.

    32. Re:No thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stupid comparison. Just complete and uter stupidity

      Over what period of time have you accumulated 600 books?

      >I have around six hundred books, with an average purchase price of $20
      >If I were to pay $10 per year per book, six hundred books would be .... (Still F***ING cheaper then $20 per book)

      600 books times $20 a book is $12,000 over 10 years.

      So previously it took you 10 years to buy 600 books.

      Now suddenly you will purchase 600 books in one year....ya that is a valid comparison

      Moron. Wish I knew who you really were so I could sell you stuff...your grasp of finances is horrible

    33. Re:No thanks by bsdaemonaut · · Score: 1

      Debates about the contrast aside, an LCD screen bothers my eyes far more and because of kerotaconus it's hard for me to read any paper back book no matter how white the page is -- with the adjustable size of fonts alone I'm pretty skeptical of people telling me the kindle is hard on their eyes simply because I can't read anything else easily without contacts. Your mileage of course, may vary.

    34. Re:No thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just complete and uter stupidity

      Tee hee.

    35. Re:No thanks by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      something that I've done for all of Stephenson's books following Snow Crash.

      I've got 'The Big U' in it's original edition. Not in hardback, mind you.

      Stephenson just wishes for an all-electronic publishing world because he wants the ability to retract old stuff. Sort of his longing to be George Lucas taking hold, I suppose.

    36. Re:No thanks by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      in case you missed it....

      If you missed it, that's just too bad. Because it's just electrons, and you'll never, ever, be able to buy your used copy at a thrift store for 69 cents. It'll go away as soon as the original purchaser tires of it.

      I can't think of a more creamy wet dream for the publishers.

    37. Re:No thanks by jgrahn · · Score: 1

      It's not the setting that bugs me, it's the verbosity. The Baroque Cycle was a good read, but about 1500 pages too long. I couldn't even motivate myself to start on Anathem.

      That's his two most recent works. Not a good foundation for your earlier claim "the author's last few works have not been up to his previous standard" ...

      For what it's worth, I think you're unwittingly right about /Anathem/. Not a bad book, but it felt like a rehash of things he had said better before -- for example in /The Diamond Age/, which everyone should read.

    38. Re:No thanks by Fred+IV · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > That's the whole point - to make the novel more dynamic and involved than a pile of printed pages.

      I feel like this takes a lot out of the experience. My relationship with the novel is already a dynamic one because my understanding and appreciation of the work changes over time. Reading Orwell's 1984 as a junior high school student was an entirely different experience compared to reading it near middle age. Appreciating those differences was a big part of what made re-reading the book worthwhile.

      Well written novels are already involving because they engage your curiosity and imagination. I can't see how an endless amount of commentary, illustration, or supplementary material can do anything other than distract from the core of the work.

    39. Re:No thanks by spiffmastercow · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, the Baroque Cycle was 6 books in 3 volumes. I consider that more than a single work. Three at the least.

    40. Re:No thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "not been up to his previous standard"?! Did you read Anathem??

    41. Re:No thanks by WMD_88 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Anathem has an end.

    42. Re:No thanks by MK_CSGuy · · Score: 1

      Dude, we had those for quite some time now... didn't you see them COMPAQ Portables?
      They're IBM compatible and everything!

    43. Re:No thanks by lxs · · Score: 1

      Stephenson just wishes for an all-electronic publishing world because he wants the ability to retract old stuff.

      You mean like the Big U? Who can blame him? That's a stinker.

    44. Re:No thanks by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      If they can get certain parts of the technology right, such as the ability to be able to always open up a map that's centered on the location of the action, particularly if it's a map you can zoom in and out of, that'd probably be worth $10 right there. Particularly for books with sprawling geographies (and especially historical books like this one) my #1 peeve is a lack of useful maps, and my #2 peeve is that even if the map is good in a broad sense, you often can't tell where the characters are in relation to said map.

    45. Re:No thanks by badboy_tw2002 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It really depends on the author I think. If you look at Tolkien's work, the narrative almost takes a back seat to his unbelievably (and pretty much unmatched) detailed history, language, lore set forth for the universe. I think going through and re-reading LOTR via a setup like this would be a much different experience.

    46. Re:No thanks by badboy_tw2002 · · Score: 1

      Well then paperbacks aren't going to live up to your exacting standards. Why complain about the $10 a year when you need to buy the hardback large print format for everything - we're talking >$20 at release minimum.

    47. Re:No thanks by spiffmastercow · · Score: 1

      But that $20 buys me a lifetime of usage and no power requirement or DRM.

    48. Re:No thanks by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Same here. I do all my reading on my PDA or PC these days, and I don't pay for "subscriptions" to static content.

      Came in hoping for DRM-free ebooks of some sort, found Xbox Live for Books, left disappointed.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    49. Re:No thanks by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Aw jeez I totally missed out on an opportunity to call it "Xbooks Live" :(

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    50. Re:No thanks by Apatharch · · Score: 1

      So you're saying I should buy a $500 iPad and pay $10/year to read a website novel that I might not even like?

      So you're saying I should buy a $30,000 car and pay $3/gallon to drive it?

      Well, if you want to stay true to the analogy, it's more like paying $30,000 for a car, $3/gal to drive it, and there's only one road in existence.

      And you don't know how long it is or where it leads.

    51. Re:No thanks by stonewallred · · Score: 1

      Agree, been reading on it for about two or three years now. manage about 5 or so pages each time I pick it up.

    52. Re:No thanks by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Everything his son wrote is awful.

      I learned my lesson soon after Asimov's death: Beware new books bearing the name of a dead author.
      I got 60 pages in something before I realized this crap couldn't possibly have been written by Isaac, and realized I'd been reading some hack riding a dead man's coat tails.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    53. Re:No thanks by gorzek · · Score: 1

      I'm posting from one of those right now! All hail the glorious 4-inch monochrome screen!

    54. Re:No thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The price point is too high, the author's last few works have not been up to his previous standard, and leisure reading at my computer is simply not possible.

      Oh rly? I for one thought Anathem was pretty top class sci-fi. Science, philosophy, math - he had geometry proofs in the back of the book for God's sake! What else do you want?

    55. Re:No thanks by jvin248 · · Score: 1

      Or when the car will break down....

      "Does the spare tire have air in it?"
      What tire?....


      .

    56. Re:No thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the future, badboy_tw2002, try not to be such a fucking dumbass.

    57. Re:No thanks by siloko · · Score: 1

      Aw jeez I totally missed out on an opportunity to call it "Xbooks Live" :(

      Apparently not . . .

    58. Re:No thanks by nanospook · · Score: 1

      How much would you have paid for a book? It's reasonable to take that risk, we take it with books all the time..

      --
      Have you fscked your local propeller head today?
    59. Re:No thanks by trawg · · Score: 1

      The price point is too high

      Debatable

      the author's last few works have not been up to his previous standard

      Subjective

      and leisure reading at my computer is simply not possible.

      Agree, but the intent is clearly to have this on iPods/iPhones/Kindles etc.

  2. Ending? by Mongoose+Disciple · · Score: 1

    The question is, will this new platform allow the author to add an ending to a novel?

    As an author, Stephenson rides the reader hard and puts them away wet, so to speak. It'd be nice if he'd address that first.

    1. Re:Ending? by badboy_tw2002 · · Score: 1

      Ananthem and the Baroque cycle both had extensive endings that seemed to tie up most of the loose ends. What was your problem there?

    2. Re:Ending? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I thought he addressed that whole thing very well and very wittily in Anathem.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    3. Re:Ending? by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Informative

      The question is, will this new platform allow the author to add an ending to a novel?

      As an author, Stephenson rides the reader hard and puts them away wet, so to speak. It'd be nice if he'd address that first.

      Your point is insightful and all, his really work did stop abruptly rather than end properly, but to be fair: he's been getting better, making progress. Heck, Anathem even had a epilogue! I think somehow the thousands and thousands of complaints wore him down.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    4. Re:Ending? by arth1 · · Score: 1

      He didn't just lift the ending from Gene Wolfe?

    5. Re:Ending? by ScentCone · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The question is, will this new platform allow the author to add an ending to a novel?

      No, the real question (other than, "have you actually read any of his recent stuff?") is: will this lame arm-chair-lit-crit-groupthink meme itself ever find an ending?

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    6. Re:Ending? by Mongoose+Disciple · · Score: 1

      I'll admit I didn't read Anathem yet, and my criticism does not properly include it.

      If he's turned a corner I'll pick it up. I've liked his earlier books right about up until the point that literary blue balls set in.

    7. Re:Ending? by Dusty101 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      At this point, I don't actually care any more. I gave up on him at the point in "Quicksilver" when he rambled on at length about Parisian horse trading markets. I found it long, tedious, and far too reminiscent of the scene in the movie "Wonder Boys", in which the student, Hannah, critiques the professor's unending work-in-progress book:

      "And even though you're book is really beautiful, I mean, amazingly beautiful, it's... it's at times... it's... very detailed. You know, with the genealogies of everyone's horses, and the dental records, and so on. And... I could be wrong, but it sort of reads in places like you didn't make any choices. At all."

      I seem to remember Stephenson covering both horse genealogy *and* character dentistry at some point.

  3. Mongorians?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why they arways tear down my warr?

    I hate freaking Mongorians!

    1. Re:Mongorians?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better them than the Moops.

  4. When can WE play with PULP? by Jonah+Hex · · Score: 1

    Most eBook/eZine/eManga software is severely lacking in ease of use and functionality, and I am unable to find anything on when they are going to release this system to the public. Anyone know when the general public will be able to try our hands at creating media rich novels?

    HEX

    1. Re:When can WE play with PULP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Anyone know when the general public will be able to try our hands at creating media rich novels?

      I believe that already exists, you can find it over at http://en.wikipedia.org

    2. Re:When can WE play with PULP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Most eBook/eZine/eManga software is severely lacking in ease of use and functionality, and I am unable to find anything on when they are going to release this system to the public. Anyone know when the general public will be able to try our hands at creating media rich novels?

      HEX

      It's called InDesign by Adobe. You can add sounds, video, links, etc to any book or document in ePub format. What they are boasting of is a social aspect. If it's popular I'm sure InDesign will add it as well.

    3. Re:When can WE play with PULP? by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Most eBook/eZine/eManga software is severely lacking in ease of use and functionality

      By design. The point of these wares is to remove your ability to do things with the material that the publisher doesn't want you to do.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    4. Re:When can WE play with PULP? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      But that only works for fiction, what if we want to write non-fiction?

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    5. Re:When can WE play with PULP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use Onscripter, Ren'Py or KiriKiri. Or even HTML with CSS and JavaScript.
      This particular wheel has been reinvented a lot. And since he doesn't reference those, there's a feeling he didn't consult them to learn from them. And since they have quite some history, there's a lingering suspicion that his wheel will turn out to be slightly square.
      There's no good case for aspiring writers to use an immature unknown system when there are mature engines out there that do the job very well.

    6. Re:When can WE play with PULP? by Jonah+Hex · · Score: 1

      Tried ONscripter and Ren'Py, as well as BladeEngine; that's what I meant by severely lacking in ease of use and functionality. There has to be something better along those lines.

      HEX

  5. More Content? by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

    Does anyone seriously think the answer to the 'content can be had for free, so people have it for free' problem is ... more content? Really?

    1. Re:More Content? by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Does anyone seriously think the answer to the 'content can be had for free, so people have it for free' problem is ... more content? Really?

      The answer is: Dynamic content. Content that doesn't stay the same from one week to the next, that way you can't just .zip it, you won't have it all.

      I think it's an interesting idea, we'll see if it works.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  6. PULP? by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

    So he's publishing PULP fiction?

  7. Wow, he's only 5 years behind webcomics by Rogerborg · · Score: 2, Funny

    In 2015, maybe he'll figure out that you give the bits away free - heck, you encourage fans to share them - and make your money from tangibles: posters, shirts and plushies.

    If you're an author whose work isn't easily translatable to posters, shirts and plushies, well, sucks to be you, but railing about it isn't going to put the genie back in the bottle. Either add some sparkly emo vampires, or get a day job lined up. That's the way it's going to go down.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    1. Re:Wow, he's only 5 years behind webcomics by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      In 2015, maybe he'll figure out that you give the bits away free - heck, you encourage fans to share them - and make your money from tangibles: posters, shirts and plushies.

      Welcome to the world of McCulture. I hope you morons enjoy it.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    2. Re:Wow, he's only 5 years behind webcomics by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Agreed! That damned printing press will destroy writers!

      What? Xerox makes a machine that COPIES paper? THAT WILL DESTROY THE INDUSTRY!

      The publishers have been screaming that the sky is falling for 100+ years. You really should ignore them and everyone that believes their tripe.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:Wow, he's only 5 years behind webcomics by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      Good point. Being able to make an unlimited number of flawless copies of any number of works for essentially no cost or effort all, without even having to shift your arse off of the sofa is exactly like standing over a hot photocopier for hours, feeding it coins in order to produce one crappy facsimile of one book. You've really helped to put the problem in perspective!

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    4. Re:Wow, he's only 5 years behind webcomics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What in the WORLD are you even talking about?

  8. Interesting idea, but we're redefining novel by AkiraRoberts · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Or perhaps we aren't. I'm still not sure how I feel about this. It is one thing to have a book with appendices and glossaries and indexes and illustrations. But this thing seems to be something else entirely and I don't know if I am really interested in this. I like open ended stories as much as the next wannabe post-modernist, but a novel that you subscribe to? Where you are interacting with other readers in a social media-esque way? Where the thing never really ends?

    Still trying to decide how I feel. I suppose the thing is, while I like things that are unfinished, sprawling and messy (which is why I've never really given a damn about Stephenson's inability to write a coherent ending), I'm still attached to the notion of the messiness being constrained between the covers of a book, that I can close with a happy sigh and say, "Damn, that was good." That might be weirdly old fashioned. Stephenson may be getting at something here and, 100 years from now, this is what "novels" will look like. But I suspect that if that is the case, we may stop calling them novels.

    --
    words, words, words, lemur, words, words words
    1. Re:Interesting idea, but we're redefining novel by Scrameustache · · Score: 3, Funny

      we may stop calling them novels.

      As soon as the novelty wears off...

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  9. Not to say he's long winded or anything by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Stephenson's new novel, Mongoliad, about the Mongol invasion of Europe

    Mongoliad

    Book 1 - General Subutai Gets Dressed For Battle
    Book 2 - General Subutai Has Breakfast

    Book 3 is still being planned, but will probably involve Subutai mounting his horse and riding out of camp.

    1. Re:Not to say he's long winded or anything by AkiraRoberts · · Score: 1

      The thing is, I don't mind all the long windedness. I personally think he's a good enough writer that he can be long winded and still be, by and large, entertaining. What I'm not super excited about is him being long winded in a non-text media. Does anybody remember that music video thing that accompanied (or prefaced, I don't recall which) Anathem? It was kind of a bit crap.

      --
      words, words, words, lemur, words, words words
    2. Re:Not to say he's long winded or anything by adavies42 · · Score: 1

      are you sure you're not confusing him with robert jordan?

      --
      Media that can be recorded and distributed can be recorded and distributed.
      -kfg
    3. Re:Not to say he's long winded or anything by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 3, Funny

      You've never seen them together at a party. I think Neal "killed" his alter ego Jordan because it was getting too hard to maintain the two personas.

  10. Enough with the "social" sh*t already. by tomhudson · · Score: 1

    If I'm reading a book, it's because I WANT to be alone with the book and my imagination. The only communication I'm interested in is with the author's words.

    We don't need, and we don't want, yet another "social platform."

    1. Re:Enough with the "social" sh*t already. by boneclinkz · · Score: 1

      I have a sinking suspicion that most of the social interaction will be forums posts like "which anime character is General Subutai most like???"

    2. Re:Enough with the "social" sh*t already. by oldhack · · Score: 1

      Don't be such an anti-social buzzkill, man. We trying to do business here.

      --
      Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    3. Re:Enough with the "social" sh*t already. by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      If I'm reading a book, it's because I WANT to be alone with the book and my imagination. The only communication I'm interested in is with the author's words.

      We don't need, and we don't want, yet another "social platform."

      No, loners don't need or want a social platform, but publishers are looking at the shipments of cash being delivered 24/7 to Blizzard, and they want some.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    4. Re:Enough with the "social" sh*t already. by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      In the Anti-Socialist Republic of Kanuckistan, book reads YOU!

      Because you know that will be coming down the pike in a few years - "Let your book interact with you. Your web cam now takes a pic of you, pastes you into the scenes, has avatars of other readers, etc. Be really social!"

      No thanks. I like to read to relax, read before I go to sleep, be able to put the book down and pick it up the next evening where I left off, without worrying that I might have offended someone by "ignoring" them, or have messages interrupt my reading, or not being able to take it into the bath.

    5. Re:Enough with the "social" sh*t already. by Infonaut · · Score: 1

      Fair enough, but how does the existence of a social platform used by other readers keep you from enjoying solitary book-reading?

      --
      Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
    6. Re:Enough with the "social" sh*t already. by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Who said it would? Not me, because I won't be using it. But I suspect a lot of readers are going to find the interruption of their focus to take away from the experience.

    7. Re:Enough with the "social" sh*t already. by guyminuslife · · Score: 1

      Galston crept through the dark halls of Heinlich manor, his footsteps whispers against the pine-beam floors. Two guards had almost spotted him within the space of an hour; he was getting old, getting clumsy. Down the corridor, the warm bath of an oil lantern flickered against carved stone walls. He blinked. It was moving toward him. Heavy boots hit the floor, where had they come from? Deftly, he slid across the hallway to the unmarked wooden door and tried lifting the handle. Locked. He tried the next one. All locked. The footsteps were getting heavier. There was nothing---no place to hide, nothing to distance himself from Heinlich's toadies and their steel-tipped boots. The window behind him was still open. He could still make a break for it, now, before it was too late.

      "Galston Tree-Hung, I presume?" said a deep voice from down the hall.

      He froze. The words were knives. How did they know his name?

      ---And now, a Map of Heinlich manor, a user-contributed sketch of the Mysterious Stranger, a short animated video of Galston as a young thief in his hometown of Freeport, and a word from our sponsors---

      --
      I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
    8. Re:Enough with the "social" sh*t already. by pregister · · Score: 1

      Thanks for deciding for the rest of us, prick.

    9. Re:Enough with the "social" sh*t already. by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      You ever sat in a meeting when marketing is pitching their latest retread "... with social media!!! It'll be awesome."

      You won't lose money over the long term betting against them.

    10. Re:Enough with the "social" sh*t already. by pregister · · Score: 1

      Don't go making me laugh while I'm trying to be righteously indignant. ;)

    11. Re:Enough with the "social" sh*t already. by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      I 'm sorry - it's just that this whole "social media" thing is just the dot-bomb with a new slogan. The bottom line so often is still "get eyeballs and we'll figure out how to make money afterward".

      Look at all the people trying to cash in on iApps - it's already an overcrowded space, and it's going to get a lot worse.

  11. The 500MB Elephant In The Room by darien.train · · Score: 1

    File size is going to be an issue on media-rich ebooks and other similar apps for some time to come. A single issue of Wired for iPad is 500MB. That means an 8GB iPad can only handle about 15 issues assuming that's all you put on the thing (not to mention having those files duplicated on your iTunes machine as well). That's a lot of data for such a diminutive magazine rack and this seems like a step-up from that.

    If Stephenson's intention is to head toward a self-inspired "Young Ladies Illustrated Primer" type experience he's going to run up against the file size issue pretty quickly.

    Also the art direction and interface elements on the Mongoliad site are embarrassingly bad. It looks like a bad Diablo tutorial site. I hope it doesn't reflect the look and feel of the actual book experience.

    I should also say that I'm terribly curious about the final result but I'm not going to hold my breath for anything revolutionary.

    --
    I don't know how many years on this Earth I got left. I'm going to get real weird with it. - Frank Reynolds
    1. Re:The 500MB Elephant In The Room by bsdaemonaut · · Score: 1

      Assuming it's web-based, which seems a far bet at this point, file size will not be a consideration. Maybe the text of the serial chapters/installments will be downloadable, though at this point there is no real indication of that, but the actual multimedia/social component will very likely be solely over the web.

    2. Re:The 500MB Elephant In The Room by Binary+Boy · · Score: 1

      The only reason Wired for iPad is so huge is because of the ridiculous approach to laying out the content using a mass of essentially fullscreen images - not text, style sheets, and discreet graphical elements - thanks to the late stage realization that they couldn't ship an app cross-compiled from Flash... so they created a series of fullscreen imagemaps as a last minute hack, seriously bloating the size compared with a more sane approach.

      http://www.macnn.com/articles/10/06/02/dev.explains.massive.size.of.magazine.downloads/

    3. Re:The 500MB Elephant In The Room by darien.train · · Score: 1

      Assuming it's web-based, which seems a far bet at this point,

      Did you mean far or fair bet? Via the article: "There’s also an iPad/iPhone/iPod Touch application going through Apple’s approval process, and an Android app in the works."

      I have my doubts about most readers ingesting this tome via a traditional desktop browser. Long-form reading in a browser is annoying for most people and having an online book with media integration just for the desktop web seems very 2001 and nothing new at all. The main success factor for this venture will be the mobile market deployment.

      Even if they went all HTML5 with the mobile app you'd still have to stream rather large media files over a 3G connection which would work but would probably suck a bit too. The 5MB HTML5 caching limit on Safari for iOS would also prohibit pre-loading large amounts of content on Apple devices.

      I generally really like Neal and Greg Baer as authors but as media application developers I have my doubts. (I know Neal is a developer but that doesn't mean he knows how to design usable products, it could actually work against him in that department).

      Naturally these are all assumptions at this point but I've had my dealings with making media-rich mobile apps and these things become issues quickly.

      --
      I don't know how many years on this Earth I got left. I'm going to get real weird with it. - Frank Reynolds
    4. Re:The 500MB Elephant In The Room by bsdaemonaut · · Score: 1

      Supposedly the first chapter was released today, and thus far it appears completely web based and pretty uneventful. Honestly the thing seems hardly set up right now, so I don't really understand why they made an announcement.. in its current condition its going to scare off a lot of people.

    5. Re:The 500MB Elephant In The Room by darien.train · · Score: 1

      That article is honestly a bunch of lame CYA for the designers and developers of the magazine apps. I love how it says what bad practices they used and then goes on to say that those same practices are going to be used by the rest of the iPad publishers. I can guarantee you that even the SteveJob himself knows that doing what his advertisers want is going to lead to huge file sizes on these apps. I have the app in questions and can tell you that it's not Wired's content that's eating up most of the space, it's the ads.

      Supporting every advertisers branding, typeface, and content in both portrait and landscape mode is going to require more space and cost much more than if it was done with markup instead of flats. You can't just go installing huge sets of typefaces onto a device without paying licensing fees to the foundry for each installation and you can't markup text to be rendered without a native typeface installed (same as the web). Representing fonts as flat images however does not require the same licensing (it requires a license for use for the content creator, not the user) so that's going to stay the same for any ad that stays "on-brand" (i.e. 95% of them.)

      In conclusion, the average file size might go down a little bit over the next few months but it's still going to be in the multiple hundreds of megabytes for a while to come.

      --
      I don't know how many years on this Earth I got left. I'm going to get real weird with it. - Frank Reynolds
  12. I know how it's going to end... by demonbug · · Score: 1

    Be not!

    -or-

    It turns out Kublai really was a god!

    (Sorry, the -iad ending to the title puts me in mind of rather more recent fiction than the [I assume] intended allusion)

  13. He will be surprised by joeflies · · Score: 1

    He will be surprised to discover that the primary users of his technology will use it for a word-by-word critique of his novel. It's easier to tear down than it is to build.

  14. The flaw in this kind of model by c0d3g33k · · Score: 2, Interesting

    the traditional model of paying for content may not hold up when the content can "be canned and sent around to your friends for free," but that people will hopefully still pay for content if "the experience is so much more rich, so much more involving."

    The flaw is that the 'extra' content that makes 'the experience so much more rich, so much more involving' can also be 'cannned and sent around to your friends for free'. In principle this is no different from the 'shareware' model for software and games that flourished in the early 90s. Give folks a little bit of the experience and hope they pay for the full monty. Ok, fine, but unless the nature of the extra stuff is sufficiently different from the original, it suffers from the same weaknesses. People can share a glossary and such stuff just as easily. Incrementally withholding content of essentially the same nature doesn't qualify as a long term sustainable model. The extra stuff needs to be something different and much better. This might be economically infeasible, but having a small troupe of actors under contract to the author/publisher stop by your house for a fee and engage in a personalized enactment of a crucial part of the story might work as entertainment worth paying for. If the author is clever enough, this could be customized to each reader/group so it couldn't be recorded and distributed in kind as mentioned above. So okay, that wouldn't work, probably, but with a little imagination, someone could come up with something that would.

    IMHO, this kind of content delivery where the experience is solely controlled and managed by the 'rights holders' is not sufficient any longer. That ship has sailed and easy duplication plus the internet has blown that model out of the water. They should be thinking more along the lines of licensed creation of user created content where they exert less control but help make the 'fanfic' experience 'so much more rich, so much more involving'. Instead of Foxing fan driven efforts, what if content providers licensed copyrighted materials and such to interested fans for a reasonable fee? instead of being limited to putting together a crappy, budget limited fan film on your own dime and living in fear of the lawyers, what if you could buy "authentic" set pieces and props to make your fan driven effort that much more real? What if you could legitimately charge for viewings of your film/play to recoup the costs plus a franchise-like kickback to the original 'rights holder'? And so on.

    It seems to me that engaging the fans (or more precisely, non-professional creators) and helping them enjoy your ideas as much as possible, including helping them with stuff that they find costly or uninteresting (like recreating 'authentic props') might be a better approach than just controlling everything as much as possible and counting on the model of "getting enough asses in the seats" at the local theater or sofa.

    I don't know. Maybe this wouldn't work, but from what i can see, there is plenty of energy out there for riffing on existing stuff (when people lack the imagination or time/energy to create from scratch) that remains untapped. Maybe it's time to explore that a bit more. Set loose the lawyers on me for my lovingly crafted Tom Bombadil addition to the LOTR films and I will hate you forever. Give me help and a discount from WETA for props and I may love you all the more and keep doing it longer.

    Just sayin.

    1. Re:The flaw in this kind of model by bsdaemonaut · · Score: 1

      Hellgate London had a similar "extra content" model and look what happened to Flagship.

  15. The Great Expectations Marketing Strategy by ideonexus · · Score: 3, Informative

    So it's a serialized novel, like Dicken's Great Expectations or Stephen King's Green Mile, where you get readers to subscribe for a year, and then get more money from them when you publish the finalized ebook or hardcopy. I'm sure this format could work and make money, but the fact that the NYT's ran this article, with a link to the website, which doesn't yet have a "Subscribe" option yet marks a sorely missed opportunity.

    I'll be interested in seeing how this turns out. As many commenters have noted, it's nothing new, and reading for long stretches on a desktop, laptop, iPad, or cell phone is uncomfortable. I tried to write a novel using MediaWiki and allowing user contributions, but the online format drove people away. Illustrations might make it more appealing, but user contributions could quickly make it go the way of Oort-Cloud, lots of people posting mediocre content and nobody reading any of it.

    --
    i ~ Celebrating Science, Cyberspace, Speculation
    1. Re:The Great Expectations Marketing Strategy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So it's a serialized novel, like Dicken's Great Expectations or Stephen King's Green Mile, where you get readers to subscribe for a year, and then get more money from them when you publish the finalized ebook or hardcopy. I'm sure this format could work and make money, but the fact that the NYT's ran this article, with a link to the website, which doesn't yet have a "Subscribe" option yet marks a sorely missed opportunity.

      I'll be interested in seeing how this turns out. As many commenters have noted, it's nothing new, and reading for long stretches on a desktop, laptop, iPad, or cell phone is uncomfortable. I tried to write a novel using MediaWiki and allowing user contributions, but the online format drove people away. Illustrations might make it more appealing, but user contributions could quickly make it go the way of Oort-Cloud, lots of people posting mediocre content and nobody reading any of it.

      Oort-Cloud is an experiment, one that is currently senescent. I understand you are disappointed in the site, but as an OC contributor, I hope you realize that the result of an experiment depends on the variables you mix together. I think the OC still holds the promise for interesting results.

  16. Stephenson just isn't a techie any more... by Chemisor · · Score: 1

    Science fiction sales must be really plummeting, since all the authors want to leave the genre as soon as possible. They write a few scifi novels and then switch to fantasy, or, in Stephenson's case, historical fiction. People read those too, of course, but it's an entirely different audience. We techies are not interested in the past; we are interested in the future. We might want to examine history for forgotten ideas that might be helpful in the future, but we certainly don't want to live there! No horse-driven carriages please, enough with the stupid wishing-makes-it-so bullshit, and primitive communities that have never seen a bath. There are no noble savages out there and primitivism in real life results in poverty, disease, starvation, and general misery. Only technology can let people move out of their cold and drafty caves, stop spending their nights shivering around a fire (assuming they have the technology of building one), and finally acquire enough time to do something other than foraging for food. Something, like, perhaps, rational thinking - an activity that leads to more technology and a more comfortable life. And it is an activity you can't get to if you persist in believing in magic spells or that studying history (or the Bible) will yield answers to every possible problem.

    1. Re:Stephenson just isn't a techie any more... by metrometro · · Score: 1

      Stephenson has argued that techies SHOULD be interested in the past. You're welcome to disagree, but he's not abandoning you. I thought the history of science and technology built into his Baroque Cycle was interesting, and really the only redeeming feature of that very long book.

    2. Re:Stephenson just isn't a techie any more... by bsdaemonaut · · Score: 1

      It's all a big cycle. In the 80's and early 90's it seemed like Science Fiction was the thing, now it's Fantasy. It'll all come back around again when people get bored.

    3. Re:Stephenson just isn't a techie any more... by hex0D · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I have a suspicion you haven't actually read The Baroque Cycle. To me it seemed all about the idea that only rational thinking and actual science (not 'alchemy') can move civilization forward. It painted a picture of the 17th/18th century as an interesting place, but not a pleasant one. Especially if you have bladder stones. *shudder*

      And what's with the 'we'? Are techies now some sort of homogeneous hive mind that are all interested or not in the exact same thing?

    4. Re:Stephenson just isn't a techie any more... by Coriolis · · Score: 1

      Everyone's scared of the Singularity. Fantasy is easier.

      --
      Rgasuya aata! : I have been coding Perl and cannot tell where my fingers are now!
    5. Re:Stephenson just isn't a techie any more... by slyborg · · Score: 1

      >but it's an entirely different audience

      A bigger audience. This is Stephenson's day job.

      I loved the guy's early work, which was snarky and fresh (if somewhat weak on actual concluding), but the 'historical fiction' genre bores me. Also, the "more is more" aesthetic he has pursued the last ~10 years doesn't
      really work for me, I don't have the time to absorb the sheer volume of his awesomeness that Stephenson insists you ingest along with the novel....

    6. Re:Stephenson just isn't a techie any more... by Chemisor · · Score: 1

      > I have a suspicion you haven't actually read The Baroque Cycle. To me it seemed all about the idea
      > that only rational thinking and actual science (not 'alchemy') can move civilization forward.

      That's quite correct, I haven't read it and do not intend to. You don't need to tell me that only rational thinking can move civlization; that's just preaching to the choir. Like I said, it's for an entirely different audience.

      > And what's with the 'we'? Are techies now some sort of homogeneous hive mind that are all interested or not in the exact same thing?

      Techies, like all other groups, define group membership by adherence to a particular set of values, which in our case are technology and everything that makes it possible, like intelligence, rational thought, personal freedom, etc. So yes, it is quite appropriate to say "we" when you are talking about the group you belong to; you either share these values, or you don't belong to the group. In the case of history, I would expect that while you may be interested in the history of technology (as opposed to political history, which consists mainly of who killed whom when, and thus is one of the most useless subjects in existence), you would be studying it with an eye on the future, not as an end in itself.

    7. Re:Stephenson just isn't a techie any more... by IICV · · Score: 3, Informative

      Science fiction sales must be really plummeting, since all the authors want to leave the genre as soon as possible. They write a few scifi novels and then switch to fantasy, or, in Stephenson's case, historical fiction.

      I'm guessing you're unacquainted with Alastair Reynolds, then, or pretty much any other author who writes "hard" science fiction.

      And the thing is, really, most "science fiction" authors aren't really writing science fiction. William Gibson, for instance, wrote the original Neuromancer manuscripts on a typewriter - he's about as technical as any other English major, and it really shows even in Neuromancer. Neil Stephenson, despite having written a couple of pretty good sciencey fiction novels, isn't really into it - he's much more of a nerd who does a bunch of research into something and then writes a story about it, as can be seen even in Snow Crash (ancient Sumeria), Cryptonomicon (the history of cryptography), Anathem (the history of logic and philosophy) and Diamond Age (the fundamentals of computation). Of course he's going to go off and write something else - he's not really interested in writing about science fiction, he seems to be far more interested in doing historical research and writing a story about it. It was basically a coincidence that he became known as a science fiction writer.

      If you look at the actual hard SF authors, on the other hand, they've been quietly pumping novels out since the genre was invented. Greg Egan's been consistently publishing hard SF, as have Stephen Baxter, Vernor Vinge, Greg Bear and Charles Stross. Heck, Richard K. Morgan's Altered Carbon novels and Iain M. Banks's books (when he publishes like that) probably count too, though they're not really so much science fiction as they are fantasy in a sciencey setting.

      Look: if you can't find authors who consistently publish good science fiction novels, you're just not looking in the right places.

    8. Re:Stephenson just isn't a techie any more... by metrometro · · Score: 1

      Are techies now some sort of homogeneous hive mind?

      I see you've read The Diamond Age...

    9. Re:Stephenson just isn't a techie any more... by largesnike · · Score: 1

      bloody hell...what a rant.
      Look Neal Stevenson's interest in the 17th and 18th Centuries with the Baroque Cycle is unlikely to have any thing to do with him wishing he was there, or that he is primitivist, that he harps after religion, or wants to live in a cave. You've obviously got some axe to grind, if you think its reasonable to suggest such a thing. If you're so offended by his abandonment of Sci Fi (if that was really his primary interest in the first place), head off to the hard science paradise that is Greg Bear, Greg Egan or Ian Banks.
      By the way, I'm a techie, and I enjoyed the baroque cycle, so you can drop the 'we' stuff as well please.

      --
      "Laugh while you can a-monkey boy!" - Dr Emilio Lizardo
  17. Doesn't Apple Do This? by NicknamesAreStupid · · Score: 1

    I thought Apple's ePub let you do this too. Not to slight Stephenson's work, the concept seems well established. So, there is probably a market for it, but it does not need to replace books or movies or even PowerPoint to succeed.

    1. Re:Doesn't Apple Do This? by slyrat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I thought Apple's ePub let you do this too. Not to slight Stephenson's work, the concept seems well established. So, there is probably a market for it, but it does not need to replace books or movies or even PowerPoint to succeed.

      I'm afraid that ePub is not something Apple came up with. Otherwise, yes I am hoping that it becomes the more universal way books are published when they are electronic. That way you really are buying the book rather than the book for a particular device.

    2. Re:Doesn't Apple Do This? by metrometro · · Score: 1

      Execution is everything, as Apple has itself demonstrated many times.

      Also, EPUB is not an Apple product. It's an open standard that Apple has adopted somewhat grudgingly. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EPUB

  18. Ok, I get it.. by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    "there are also social features that allow readers to create their own profiles, earn badges for activity on the site or in the application, and interact with other readers"

    It's a game platform. Ok, how much is the subscription?

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  19. So do I... by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    "I can remember reading Dune for the first time, and I started by reading the glossary," Stephenson say. "Any book that had that kind of extra stuff in it was always hugely fascinating to me."

    I remember reading The Hobbit, then the Ring trilogy, and then the Silmarillion. With the History of Middle-Earth, Tolkien pretty much succeeded in writing more about the books than the books themselves, his son's contributions included.

    The Dune series is deserving of being made into movies too, but it's not necessary to remake the original again. Just move on to Dune Messiah. The SciFi flop can be ignored. Maybe Brian's works too, though we would never get that far.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  20. That explains a lot by StikyPad · · Score: 1

    "I can remember reading Dune for the first time, and I started by reading the glossary," Stephenson say. "Any book that had that kind of extra stuff in it was always hugely fascinating to me."

    So fascinating, in fact, that he decided to write glossaries and call them novels. "Glossaries aren't tied up with complications like plots, and I can make clever Lucas-esque puns with characters names! Get it? Low-key? Loki? Ahh, I kill me."

    1. Re:That explains a lot by jorgeuva · · Score: 1

      Different Neil, I think.

      Unless Loki shows up in The Big U or Zodiac, neither of which I've read.

    2. Re:That explains a lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neil Gaiman, not Neal Stephenson.

    3. Re:That explains a lot by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Ah, right you are.. I fail.

  21. The problem is greed and incompetence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We're asked to pay to much in order to support privileged people as they pretend they are talented. Perhaps if publishers invested in talent instead of their friends, family and the well-connected we'd have authors worth reading. Sadly, the publishing industry, like all big business, is simply too corrupt to be able to function effectively.

    Greed is evil.

  22. DEVOlution of the novel? by hex0D · · Score: 1
    mongoloid he was a mongoloid

    nobody even cared

  23. What about in two or three years' time? by m50d · · Score: 1

    Didn't he take down a vibrant wiki that had been hosted describing the universe of one of his earlier projects, to make way for a sterile marketing page for one of his newer ones? Or am I thinking of someone else?

    --
    I am trolling
  24. Pictures and Maps Please by SumterLiving · · Score: 0

    I'm still living in the 1990's. No smart phone, no e-reader, bell bottoms and an afro. But when I buy an e-reader the things I'd like to see are: - Pictures of Bob "The Evil Villain" Smith and Mary "the hottie" Jones, President Bill Gates and so on. This would help me keep characters straight in my mind. - Maps...when Bob jets off to Purgeastan to kill Mary in his $1billon Killstar jet, I'd like to see where this country is located and maybe some details of the cities he visited. - Maybe a picture of the Killstar jet would be nice. I'd be willing to pay for stuff like this that may add to the enjoyment of the work of fiction. Until then, my local library will be my Amazon.Com fiction source.

  25. Who *are* you? by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 1

    "I am Subotai! Thief and archer! I am Hyrkanian . . . the great order of Kerlait!"

    "So what are you doing here?"

    "Dinner for wolves."

    [both laugh]

  26. Interesting. by MaWeiTao · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's a neat idea, although this particular implementation might not be ideal. I tend to start digging around for more information on the web regarding novels I've gotten particularly interested in. This might include background information, interpretations or artwork. However, I can't say I'd ever pay for this and I'm not interested in a social component at all. I'm wouldn't be compelled to follow someone and read their thoughts on novels I haven't read simply because I enjoyed what they had to say about this one.

    I suppose a community like this would allow for users to add to the expanded universe. While it's interesting it's something I've never gotten into. I'd rather go to the source, the original creator. I find too much inconsistency, too many elements disruptive to canon and it tends to be too much to absorb. And I think writing, for a lot of people, is a personal thing. I've got my own vision of how things are, what should or shouldn't happen. If I were to add to a universe I've created I'd want it to come from me. I suppose the point at which I decided I was done with that universe then it would no longer be a problem.

    For years I've had the idea of releasing novels, comics, etc in episodic form and allowing readers to guide the story. Basically at certain points they could vote on a few possible outcomes. It might make for an engaging experience, but it wont work if the author has a particular story they want to tell or an idea they want to convey.

    Of course, a big problem is that too many people seem to think everything they find on the internet should be free. This stuff takes a lot of time and effort, not to mention the expense of having this stuff available online somewhere. There are creative ways to entice people. But if all the effort went into writing the book, why should I be expected to generate income from something like t-shirts or signed artwork? It would be a travesty is writers were forced into writing Harry Potter or Twilight style novels in order to be able to be able to make money. The sci-fi section of bookstores already seems to be shrinking, slowly absorbed by manga and bad mystery novels.

    1. Re:Interesting. by sootman · · Score: 1

      I feel the exact same way, I've had that thought myself, and a couple years ago I took the first steps to creating exactly what you're describing. I wanted to create a Wikipedia-style thing where people could contribute whatever they knew or found out about a particular book -- for example, pictures of Italian locales mentioned in John Grisham's The Broker, or taking a freely-remixable book like Cory Doctorow's Little Brother and copying it directly into the Wiki, then adding pics of devices described, scenery, etc. -- but I haven't had the time to get it into a state where I felt like publicizing it. So it's just sitting there almost empty, but seeing at least one like mind has inspired me to go ahead and put it out there. If anyone wants to register* and contribute, have at it. Even if you want to pimp your own book, whatever. Go nuts.

      Of course, a big problem is that too many people seem to think everything they find on the internet should be free. This stuff takes a lot of time and effort, not to mention the expense of having this stuff available online somewhere.

      I have a friend who runs a server. I help him out every so often. In return, he gives me free hosting. That site is free and will remain free until bandwidth becomes too expensive (not bloody likely) at which point I'll chip in some money, ask for donations, or run some google ads.

      * registration required to keep spam down.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  27. Just another advertising opportunity by edawstwin · · Score: 1

    "The core of the experience is still a text novel, but authors can add additional material like background articles, images, music, and video..." and ads.

    --
    I don't want to achieve immortality through my work. I want to achieve it by not dying. - Woody Allen
  28. Familiar by TyTheBold · · Score: 1

    X-Book Live anyone?

    The social sphere has been the key to ensuring gaming has kept/out pace(d) other media, and with the rate other sites are integrating social media, entangling books with the rest of the digital web sounds like the next step for the medium.

    The sole convinence of eBooks is that fact that my cellular device is capable of recalling them in mere seconds and can be easily stowed, which make reading in the elevator/doing vague leasure activity/driving at high speeds a lot more convinent. Actually doing something else with these bits of code sounds fine by me.

  29. if you think the writing is beautiful... by chocolatetrumpet · · Score: 1

    I'm with AkiraRoberts - I think Stephenson writes beautifully and the writing by its very nature is pleasurable to read. It doesn't matter to me what he writes about; I'll read it.

    That said, I also saw the Anathem music video and also thought it was crap.

    Still, I'm super excited about Mongoliad.

    My perspective as a content creator is probably biased, but I'm happy to subscribe to this content and I believe it is probably the future of media...

    --
    Spoon not. Fork, or fork not. There is no spoon.
  30. Wow, didn't see this one coming... by __aaasvk1266 · · Score: 1

    I'll probably catch a Troll Rating for this, but, so be it: An intervention is needed. I have been a very big fan of Neal's work. I use the past tense because his last four books have been a disappointment (I gave up on Anathem after 100 pages), where they all suffer from the same thing: The apparent lack of an editor willing to stand up to the author, and take him out to the woodshed as needed.

    Now that Neal is going to push the publishing envelope by going into the realm of something cutting edge (HyperText is going to be _huge_), he can sidestep the pesky editor link in the publishing chain all together.

    Ugh. And Double-Ugh.

    1. Re:Wow, didn't see this one coming... by largesnike · · Score: 1

      well...not from me, obviously, as I'm commenting.

      I too have found his works increasingly indulgent. The Baroque Cycle was sufferable because (1) it didn't push any idealogical barrows and (2) it was a deep immersion into times and places I've never been. Anathem though, pushed some barrows, i found myself being lead by the nose into Stephenson's point of view, and the book failed to be interesting enough to be worth the effort.

      --
      "Laugh while you can a-monkey boy!" - Dr Emilio Lizardo
    2. Re:Wow, didn't see this one coming... by __aaasvk1266 · · Score: 1

      The Baroque Cycle could have easily been two books, instead of three. Personally, Neal's... expositional style can be quite engaging. In the case of the BC, the story, and everything else good about it was offset by a bunch of intellectual wanking.

      If you are interested in the time period, and the subject matter, check out a _much_ shorter read that published before the BC: A Conspiracy of Paper, by David Liss. I would also recommend his Whiskey Rebels, which is a continuation (of sorts) with regards to the treatment of money.

  31. Grammar Alert by Apple+Acolyte · · Score: 1

    Why would I want to read anything by an author who uses the ungrammatical form "much more rich"? The superlative of rich is richer, not more rich.

    --
    Part of the hardcore faithful who believed in Apple long before it was cool again to do so
  32. Geeking Out by guyminuslife · · Score: 1

    There are two kinds of people in the world: people who have read The Silmarillion, and people who started reading it, got bored, and did something else. Neal Stephenson is firmly in the former camp, he is a self-professed geek who loves to "geek out." I have a friend who does not consider himself to have finished a Final Fantasy game until he has killed every monster, collected everything that can be collected, maxed out every character, and unlocked every achievement. (Or whatever they do in FF, it's been a long time since I played any of them.) Most people prefer to read the The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings and then stop reading Tolkien, and once they've saved the world from Sephiroth/Sin/somebody bad, then they put down their game controller. There is a market for this kind of obscene dedication to supplemental materials, obscure lore, and extras; Trekkies do learn Klingon, after all. But this kind of dedication is unpredictable, and fan communities will grow organically if they grow at all, without shepherding. I do not think that this sort of product has the market that Neal Stephenson thinks it has.

    --
    I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
  33. SPOILER! by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    I gave up on him at the point in "Quicksilver" when he rambled on at length about Parisian horse trading markets.

    You mean the super important plot point about the trade of very unique-looking Arabian horses for a certain extraordinary slave girl by a French nobleman? You gave up at that point? Your loss.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

    1. Re:SPOILER! by Painted · · Score: 1

      I slogged through Quicksilver (and I'm a big fan of his other, earlier works), and after it I couldn't touch another thing he wrote. It would spend 100 pages describing interesting events and people, then suddenly change gears into a completely different situation, where it would spend 100 pages getting interesting, then change gears and spend 100 pages...

      The only consistent thing was a completely unsympathetic woman who would sell anyone and anything out for... something? The whole thing seemed like 8 unrelated first chapters of novels set in a vaguely similar time, all of which didn't know anything about the other chapters. I actually own all three books in the Baroque Cycle, and Anathem, but I just cannot bring myself to consider the effort* and work* of reading them. That is sad, in my opinion.

      --
      http://marsandmore.com - Posters of space, spacecraft, and astronomy.
    2. Re:SPOILER! by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      The whole thing seemed like 8 unrelated first chapters of novels set in a vaguely similar time, all of which didn't know anything about the other chapters.

      Yikes, I can't advise you to read the Confusion then, because that's the criticism I would find perfectly reasonable about it. What can I say, I read the Baroque Cycle (am now picturing a fancy bike) twice, and I wanted more by the time I got to the end. So, keep them for when you'll have a lot of time to kill (long trip, hospital, etc), that way its wordiness will serve your needs :)

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  34. Digital and Novel together???? by dirtydog · · Score: 1

    So he's resurrected Digital and starting running Netware on Alpha boxes???

    HOLY CRAP THAT IS SOOOO L33T!

  35. Serial. by radarsat1 · · Score: 1

    It's a certainly a bit of a stretch to claim that publishing a novel in serial installments is a new idea.

    ("But this is on... THE INTERNET!")

    BUT I'm a huge Stephenson fan, so I'm looking forward to reading this whether I end up subscribing or buying the book after the fact.

  36. Didn't Tad Williams Do this? by arkenian · · Score: 1

    Didn't Tad Williams already do the book subscription thing with Shadowmarch? I remember that, and didn't find it terribly successful. That said, I think if there's any author out there who can come up with an 'enhanced book' and execute it well, Neal Stephenson is the guy. The FAQ explicitly states that you get to keep all the content you already bought (DRM free, I should add!) so I plunked my $10 down, to support the experiment, and we'll see how it goes.

  37. This sums it up neatly by Fnord666 · · Score: 1

    From the FTA:
    "Subutai is self funded."

    Need I say more?

    --
    'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
  38. Call it what it is by Fnord666 · · Score: 1

    Let's just call this what it really is:

    A glorified fan fiction site.

    --
    'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables