Slashdot Mirror
Hawking Picks Physics Over God For Big Bang
Hugh Pickens writes "The Guardian reports that in his new book, The Grand Design, Professor Stephen Hawking argues that the Big Bang, rather than occurring following the intervention of a divine being, was inevitable due to the law of gravity. 'Because there is a law such as gravity, the universe can and will create itself from nothing. Spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the universe exists, why we exist,' Hawking writes. 'It is not necessary to invoke God to light the blue touch paper and set the universe going.' Hawking had previously appeared to accept the role of God in the creation of the universe. Writing in his bestseller A Brief History Of Time in 1988, Hawking wrote: 'If we discover a complete theory, it would be the ultimate triumph of human reason – for then we should know the mind of God.'"
This is why I never did well in the higher math classes in college.
So... I thought gravity required there be something with mass in order to create gravity. Doesn't that mean in order for there to be a law of gravity you need stuff with mass attracting each other? Which requires something, not nothing, so --
Damn. There it goes again, brain matter all over the wall. Excuse me while I get a spatula.
Eviscerati.Org: All Hail the Eviscerati
It's turtles all the way down!
It's ninjas all the way down!
Following your argument that God aka Gravity has always existed...
Yeah, but getting the shell off is hard. Sometimes I just want a simple meal.
It's ninja turtles all the way down!
Queue torrent of bullshit about wars and history. Atheists are just theists with a post-modern stick up their arse.
Pascal sent a letter. He wants his Wager back.
My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
He may be breaking the laws of physics, in Louisiana
Calling atheism a faith is like calling bald a hair color.
No doubt. I don't think Zeus will think much of their blasphemy.
This is a interesting question I have thought of quite often and I believe I have a reasonable answer.
"Time" is a by product of creation of our universe.
Keeping this in mind, there is no "need" for anyone creating god. Without universe there is no time (or at the very least time as we perceive), yet there is god (for those who believe in god, and I do). Question of creation only arises when asked in reference to "time".
Indeed, I live my life by the motto "What would Zeus Do?"
Pretty much anything he wants, it turns out.
Please read my Canon EOS tech blog at http://www.everyothershot.com
I have limited bandwidth and thus have to queue my torrents, you insensitive clod!
You may be unlikely to pick this one up too, but "Mere Christianity" is a very good book for the intellectual.
With that logic you'd have to believe in absolutely everything. Ghosts, Vampires, Aliens, FSM, Unicorns, goblins, drangons, orcs, elves (short and tall), Fraggles, Transformers, ninja turtles, Voltron, Zerg, absolutely anything that anyone could dream of.
For some reason this makes me imagine a person in deadly peril shouting, "Save me, hydralisk!"
depends on whether it's Friday night or not
Himself. He's a recursive God. He created time, traveled back in time, and then created himself. So there! No need for stinkin' turtles.
Table-ized A.I.
Gravity never says "let there be light". Gravity says "let there be heavy".
When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
But Spartacus died on the cross for me! Does that mean I should foment slave revolts?