Slashdot Mirror


Woman Wins Libel Suit By Suing Wrong Website

An anonymous reader writes "It appears that Cincinnati Bengals cheerleader Sarah Jones and her lawyer were so upset by a comment on the site TheDirty.com that they missed the 'y' at the end of the name. Instead, they sued the owner of TheDirt.com, whose owner didn't respond to the lawsuit. The end result was a judge awarding $11 million, in part because of the failure to respond. Now, both the owners of TheDirty.com and TheDirt.com are complaining that they're being wrongfully written about in the press — one for not having had any content about Sarah Jones but being told it needs to pay $11 million, and the other for having the content and having the press say it lost a lawsuit, even though no lawsuit was ever actually filed against it."

10 of 323 comments (clear)

  1. What TheDirt.com should do by Sonny+Yatsen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Maybe TheDirt.com should sue Sarah Jones for libel for making false and damaging defamatory statements about them to the courts and to the press.

    --
    My postings are informational and does not constitute legal advice. Act on it at your risk.
    1. Re:What TheDirt.com should do by tophermeyer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      True, it will probably be really easy to appeal.

      But they shouldn't have to. This is an area of out Justice system that sucks. Even though it's an easy win, they still have to pay a lawyer to go into court. Hopefully they will get their expenses reimbursed by the crack legal team that misspelled the word "Dirty".

  2. I don't like this story by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm gonna sue slashdork!

    1. Re:I don't like this story by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Which we would ALL appreciate.

  3. this just in by uncanny · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sarah Jones beats her children and smokes crack in front of them while doing it. sue that

  4. Default judgements by Fnkmaster · · Score: 5, Informative

    These default judgments for absurd amounts of money just show how broken our legal system is. If somebody doesn't show up to a court house for a lawsuit in the millions of dollars, it's probably because they weren't properly notified.

    In fact, looking at thedirt.com, there's a posting about it on top of the page. The person seems as baffled and confused as the rest of us. The site looks like a random Wordpress blog tracking celebrity gossip, almost certainly a one-person operation with no budget or staff. The address on file for the domain is that of DomainsByProxy, and notice was probably never delivered to the actual site owner.

    Did the judge ever consider that possibility before issuing an $11M default judgment against an individual? By simple inspection, one can see that Thedirt.com is very obviously not the product of a global mega-media-corporation with billions of dollars to sue for.

    Why would you ruin someone's life without forcing proper process-serving and making sure the person or a lawyer for them show up? The civil system in the US needs to be torn apart and started again from scratch, or merged into the criminal system like in (some?) European countries.

  5. This week for me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Similar thing happened to me this week.

    One of my websites got an 8 page letter from a large law firm in DC (http://www.Venable.com) on behalf of Verizon. Had all kinds of BS in it. All kinds of threats, examples, quotations from the CEO and gave 7 days to respond. The only problem was that there was supposed to be an S on the end of the domain name. They interchanged example.com and examples.com all through 8 pages apparently not knowing that there was a difference. I pointed it out and they said:
    "Our researchers had reason to believe that your company was the one that had published the referred to in my letter. I take it from your response that this is not the case; my apologies for the unintentional confusion. "

    My response was, "If you are going to sign your name to something, you better review who is doing the research for you" and included the relevant WHOIS info. If they had done a simple WHOIS lookup they would have found the correct company and then could have looked up the correct business address. I cc'd a bunch of the partners because dumb-asses like that need to be reined in.

    It must happen all the time, and it is unbelievable that no one noticed the problem. The attorneys should be embarrassed and the Judge/Clerks/Court should be even more embarrassed to have awarded a default judgement against the wrong company.

    And IAAL. Stupid.

    1. Re:This week for me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      One of the great things about being a Judge is never having to be embarrassed by any mistake you make, because you don't make mistakes.

  6. Re:"Justice" by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Maybe it was an error in judgment, but is it an $11 million error? That's sick.

    What's even sicker is the legal wonks sitting around scratching their goatees and blathering "Well, teh laws am teh laws." This is a horrific result.

    Then the lawyer could have done his diligence and filed against the proper party.

    How about the lawyer do his due diligence BEFORE all this happens? You people... seriously... there needs to be more crotches punched in this world. You're all sleepwalking zombies.

  7. The *REAL* WTF by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 5, Funny

    Imagine Skynet's embarassment when the Terminator took out Sarah Jones.