Slashdot Mirror


GameStop Pulls Medal of Honor From Military Bases

donniebaseball23 writes "EA's Medal of Honor reboot doesn't ship until October 12, but it's already seen a fair amount of controversy thanks to the publisher's decision to allow people to play as Taliban in multiplayer. The controversy just got escalated another notch, reports IndustryGamers, as the world's biggest games retailer GameStop has decided it won't sell the title at its stores located on US military bases. The new Medal of Honor won't be advertised at these stores either. GameStop noted that they came to this decision 'out of respect for our past and present men and women in uniform.'"

6 of 362 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Censorship? by MozeeToby · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We trust those men and women with automatic rifles, artillery, tanks, fighter jets, and battleships. We trust them to shoot and kill people to (in theory anyway) protect our way of life. We trust them to literally take a bullet so that people back home don't have to (again in theory at least). I think that we should give them the respect they deserve and trust them to make their own decisions about what games to buy and play. Pulling the advertisements I can agree with, maybe even putting the game behind the counter out of sight, but how can you justify making the game completely unavailable to them? But that's just my opinion.

  2. Re:Censorship? by MozeeToby · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My point from my original post which you seem to have missed:

    I think that we should give them the respect they deserve and trust them to make their own decisions about what games to buy and play.

    Telling people who are risking their lives for us that they aren't emotionally stable enough to handle this game is insulting. Maybe some of them can't, but that should be their decision, not yours or mine.

  3. Re:Censorship? by odies · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What about some guy who lost his Afghan/Iraqi/Pakistan friend when US soldiers shot them? Maybe he even wasn't an soldier, but a civilian. There have been countless news about those shootings. What makes it more right to be an US soldier shooting them than being the "enemy" and shooting US soldiers? Hypocrisy at its best.

    You know, they are people just like you. They have families, childhood, friends, loved ones, dreams. Don't forget that on your high horse.

  4. Re:Censorship? by MozeeToby · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yes, and what I'm saying is that pulling the game from your stores does not show politeness. It's a highly anticipated game that doubtless many people in the military are interested in playing, Gamestop is just saying "nope" without even asking what they think about the matter. As I said before, I could understand not putting up giant displays advertising for the game, and I can even understand putting the game behind the counter and making available by request only, I cannot understand taking that decision away soldiers themselves.

    As someone below this post put it much more elegantly:

    "You can't have that."
    "But-"
    "Because I RESPECT you!.

  5. Re:Censorship? by imthesponge · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Sorry, you can't buy this game here. We're showing respect for you and refusing to sell it to you."

  6. Re:Too Soon by h4rr4r · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Do they let the American soldiers in the game shoot civilians, rape young Afghanis and bomb weddings with UAVs?

    Try to remember this is only a game.