Slashdot Mirror


Anti-Google Video Runs In Times Square

Hugh Pickens writes "The NY Times reports that Consumer Watchdog is running a 540-square-foot video billboard advertisement in Times Square, New York that shows Google CEO Eric Schmidt as an ingratiating ice cream truck driver who knows everything about everyone and happily offers free ice cream in exchange for full body scans. The group says its goal is to push Congress and the Federal Trade Commission to create a Do Not Track Me list, similar to the Do Not Call list developed to prevent telemarketers from aggressively calling consumers. 'Do you want Google or any other online company looking over your shoulder and tracking your every move online just so it can increase its profits?' writes the group's president, Jamie Curtis, at the group's web site. 'Consumers have a right to privacy. They should control how their information is gathered and what it is used for.' The FTC's consumer affairs group had no comment on whether the agency is considering creating a Do Not Track Me list."

16 of 346 comments (clear)

  1. Free ice cream? by Yvan256 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm allergic to dairy, you insensitive clod!

    1. Re:Free ice cream? by bsDaemon · · Score: 4, Informative

      Exactly, and the REAL Google would know that, unlike this fake-ass Google knock-off going around trying to kill off the lactose intolerant.

  2. Re:How much did Microsoft pay them to do this? by spiffmastercow · · Score: 3, Informative

    Coming up next, our most recent study showing that Linux is more expensive than Windows.

    For most businesses, Linux is more expensive than windows. Anyone who can tie their own shoes can set up a Windows server. Linux, on the other hand, requires someone who at least kind of knows what they're doing, and that commands more money. Not to mention the cost of training the Luddite employees on a new operating system, when it took them 10 years to get used to the last one.

  3. Re:So in order to Not Track Me properly by hedwards · · Score: 2, Informative

    You meant tracking should be opt-in. Opt out is better than what we currently have, because at least you can get out if you want to.

  4. Re:So in order to Not Track Me properly by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 4, Informative

    You know, that's a very good point. the only way to NOT track somebody, IS TO TRACK THEM.

    Except it's not a good point and what you said is not true. It's very simple to not track someone without knowing a single thing about them. By default you set up your system to not store any information about a user of your website unless you've obtained their consent. Wow, that was hard.

  5. Re:Who sponsors this? by king+neckbeard · · Score: 4, Informative

    There are quite a few signs pointing to Microsoft funding them. Searching 'Microsoft' on http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/ gives you mostly Google results, despite Microsoft being a convicted monopolist with a long history of abuse, which is the kind of thing a consumer watchdog should be reporting on

    --
    This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  6. BUSTED! by richtaur · · Score: 5, Informative
  7. Re:People have all the privacy they want: by Qwavel · · Score: 5, Informative

    You want to opt-out of being tracked by Google? Simple:
    http://tools.google.com/dlpage/gaoptout
    You change your mind about using Google and want to export all your data? Simple:
    http://www.dataliberation.org/

    The website/organization behind this ad doesn't even mention those links.

    You think MS gives you options like this? Facebook?

    I'm a big supporter of legit consumer organizations, like the BBB, but this one is clearly bogus. By supporting and giving attention to an organization like this we undermine the legit ones.

  8. Re:The irony is that Consumer Watchdog is ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Why is this ironic?
    They are a shill group paid for by MS to astroturf, so they need to know how well they are doing

    (see http://techrights.org/2009/05/04/consumer-watchdog-exposed/)

  9. Re:So in order to Not Track Me properly by blair1q · · Score: 2, Informative

    I recently ran into

    (*) Click here to have your nuts bitten off

    See how there's no other option?

    I'm still having an email fight with them to get them to flip the bit to opt me out. They seem to hesitate whenever I mention federal law, so I'll keep doing that.

  10. Re:Free ice cream by gorzek · · Score: 2, Informative

    Now we know what you two would do for a Klondike bar.

    I'd kill a man.

  11. Re:Not new by smbarbour · · Score: 2, Informative

    Or at the very least sign out of Google before you go to www.hotunderagehorserape.com (god I hope that's not a real site).

    Under Rule #35, you are now legally required to create it.

  12. Re:Who sponsors this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
  13. Re:So in order to Not Track Me properly by GrumblyStuff · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's more of a pogostick, really.

  14. Re:So in order to Not Track Me properly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    http://tools.google.com/dlpage/gaoptout

    There, now you can get out if you want to.

    But please, don't let me interrupt you in your witchhunt.