Slashdot Mirror


VISA Pulls Plug On ePassporte, Porn Webmasters

tsu doh nimh writes "Credit card giant VISA International has suspended its business with ePassporte, an Internet payment system widely used to pay adult Webmasters and a raft of other affiliate programs. A number of adult Webmaster forums are up in arms over the move because many of their funds are now stranded. Visa has been silent on the issue so far, but KrebsOnSecurity.com points to an e-mail from ePassporte founder Christopher Mallick saying the unexpected move by Visa wouldn't strand customers indefinitely. Mallick co-directed Middle Men, a Paramount film released in August that tells the story of his experience building one of the world's first porn site payment processing firms, as well as the Russian mobsters, porn stars and FBI agents he ran into along the way. Interestingly, the speculation so far is that Visa cut ties with ePassporte due to new anti-money laundering restrictions in the Credit Card Act of 2009, which affects prepaid cards and other payment card instruments that can be reloaded with funds at places other than financial institutions."

124 comments

  1. now by chronoss2010 · · Score: 0, Insightful

    now a lot of americans( that aren't lawyers) that cant act or sing are gonna be unemployed

  2. haha, hilarious post summary. by abhishekupadhya · · Score: 1

    This movie, I've to watch.

  3. outrageous by nomadic · · Score: 1

    Won't someone please think of the poor pornographers?

    1. Re:outrageous by snookerhog · · Score: 4, Insightful

      exactly. if it weren't for them, we would have no internet

    2. Re:outrageous by mrsteveman1 · · Score: 1

      Children think about them all the time. Wrap your head around THAT one :)

    3. Re:outrageous by commodore64_love · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Funny how we had internet before porn. The internet existed first (pure text), and porn didn't join the party until the mid-90s when the graphical web was taking off.
      .

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    4. Re:outrageous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's cute how your name is commodore64_love and you think that there was no porn on the internet until the world wide web went graphical. I must have been imagining all those a.b.p.e. groups.

    5. Re:outrageous by bsDaemon · · Score: 4, Informative

      I bet there were dirty stories and FTP servers housing content before the Web was even a fully-realized thought. Long before.

    6. Re:outrageous by boristdog · · Score: 1, Informative

      Funny how we had internet before porn. The internet existed first (pure text), and porn didn't join the party until the mid-90s when the graphical web was taking off.

      Ah, you poor, poor deluded soul.

      You sound like someone who never downloaded ascii porn in the 1980's.

      At 300 baud.

    7. Re:outrageous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No porn on the 'net until the mid-'90s? Are you on fucking CRACK? I suppose I imagined all those BBSes from the 80s then...

      Here's some free education for you: Amateur Action ... McHenry BBS... look 'em up.

    8. Re:outrageous by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 3, Informative

      I bet there were dirty stories and FTP servers housing content before the Web was even a fully-realized thought. Long before.

      No need to bet, I will testify. ASCII porn doesn't really count, but there were plenty of x-rated gifs (and other now mostly forgotten formats like .pic and .pcx).

      Yes, back in the day we had to spend half an hour to download a single image but the waiting made it that much sweeeter.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    9. Re:outrageous by Antisyzygy · · Score: 1

      Once videos came out I remember waiting longer than that.

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    10. Re:outrageous by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Tiny baby, we were trading porn on BBSs way before the mass of humanity was allowed to use the interwebs. GOML!

      --
      by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
    11. Re:outrageous by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 1

      They single-handedly saved Javascript.

      --
      by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
    12. Re:outrageous by blair1q · · Score: 1

      try .img

    13. Re:outrageous by Minion+of+Eris · · Score: 2, Informative
      --
      Please don't dominate the rap, Jack, if you got nothin' new to say.
    14. Re:outrageous by rudy_wayne · · Score: 2, Informative

      he internet existed first (pure text), and porn didn't join the party until the mid-90s when the graphical web was taking off.

      I was downloading porn from usenet newsgroups starting in 1987. Sure, there was no snazzy Windows GUI and it was all uuencoded text that I had to decode into pictures. But in 1987 that was pretty cool and exciting.

    15. Re:outrageous by Dishevel · · Score: 1

      He is probably just thinking back to 93. When AOL allowed him to look at the interwebtubes.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    16. Re:outrageous by Ironhandx · · Score: 2, Informative

      You do realize that the packets used for the most basic ping test are a few bits of an image of a topless pin up model, right?

      Porn joined the internet party in the form of BBS's before the internet was even the internet. I have a record of the file transfer of a single playboy playmate image from 1987. Its the first porno I have a record of on the internet(what was the internet at the time), I keep it for nostalgic purposes, plus she's hot.

      There is also a very good argument to be made that the internet would have taken a lot longer to go graphical at all if it wasn't for porn.

      Also, didn't someone find ascii porn on like the second Univac system ever built?

    17. Re:outrageous by Dogtanian · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's cute how your name is commodore64_love and you think that there was no porn on the internet until the world wide web went graphical.

      Most people who grew up with 8-bit computers didn't have access to modems or online services, let alone the Internet, some weird academic thing until circa the mid-90s, which most of us had never even heard of.

      That said, I do remember downloading porn from text-based bulletin boards when I first got on the net circa 1994....

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    18. Re:outrageous by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be surprised if there was porn via TTY before the first BBSes or AlterNet for that matter...

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    19. Re:outrageous by KimmoS · · Score: 1

      I bet there were dirty stories and FTP servers housing content before the Web was even a fully-realized thought. Long before.

      Perhaps not FTP servers, but BBS systems (dial-up, like 2400-14400bps) were a major source of adult entertainment before "the Web".

      "Long before", yeah ok, I would say "Just before" but that's relative.

    20. Re:outrageous by Greyfox · · Score: 1

      The alt.binaries newsgroups were active (And spam-ridden) long before your average person even knew he wanted a computer in his house, and BBSes (A primitive sort of one-server internet that you called on something called a "land line" and then carved the bits out of stone for the remote computer) were popular in about the same time-frame.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    21. Re:outrageous by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 1

      300 Baud... Try 110!
      Also, get off my lawn!

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    22. Re:outrageous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Had it back into '92. I know because it was one of the few things I tried searching for besides copies of Door Games when I was allowed mostly unhindered access to BBSes via my *2400 BAUD* modem when I was a kid (Bought for the whopping price of 19.99 at a swap meet. I loved that thing, even if it was a dog, and it served me all the way through the internet era. Ever tried running linux, multitasking running a MUD and playing on another, ALL OVER A 2400 baud PPP connection?!?! Yeah, that was pretty cool. Now we're all spoiled with 3rd world DSL, or 1st world cable/fiber internet and wonder why everything takes so long to download, when we used to be happy if that 500k file would download in under 30 minutes!)

      Kinda makes you wish back for the days when code/data size were something to be thought about, instead of 'The computers will run it by the time we finish it.' :D

    23. Re:outrageous by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      Yes, back in the day we had to spend half an hour to download a single image but the waiting made it that much sweeeter.

      Yep, especially if just seeing her eyes/face/neck was enough; then you could let the download complete in the background while cleaning, and be one of the first in computing history to truly multitask!

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    24. Re:outrageous by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      And a further thought: what if on some other world, private parts are placed at the top of the organism (perhaps the ground contains a lot more virulence than on our planet). Then, they wouldn't have to wait at all! (I had a similar thought in college, about having eyes on our feet, and the world would then seem to be much more in motion than it currently is. Hi to complex fish of some sort, big Hawaiian guy, jailbait follower, and ... oh yeah, knife lover who I had to bail out. Of jail, that is, not his leaky little boat.)

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    25. Re:outrageous by Lythrdskynrd · · Score: 4, Informative

      and boobies before that...

      ( . )( . )

    26. Re:outrageous by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Hi to complex fish of some sort, big Hawaiian guy, jailbait follower, and ... oh yeah, knife lover who I had to bail out. Of jail, that is, not his leaky little boat.)

      Dude, step back from the bong and call a doctor, you may have inhaled a lethal dose.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    27. Re:outrageous by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1

      Compuserve. online at 300 baud in 1982.

      Yes, in my dad's basement.

      --
      This space available.
    28. Re:outrageous by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      but the waiting made it that much sweeeter.

      Of course, progressive display with GIF's interlacing feature helped ease the suspense :)

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    29. Re:outrageous by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lenna
      This also came to mind in that regard.

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    30. Re:outrageous by Sheen · · Score: 1

      do you have a site where i can read more about the packets used for ping, and link to the image?
      Thanks :)

    31. Re:outrageous by stevencheng · · Score: 1
    32. Re:outrageous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer my women with a bit more clevage.

      ( . Y . )

    33. Re:outrageous by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Compuserve. online at 300 baud in 1982.

      That's nice for you. Yes, I'm well aware that online services had been available since the early 1980s, but that doesn't mean that the majority of computer users could afford them back then!

      Computers in the early-80s were only just getting cheap enough to be an affordable proposition for ordinary people. The modem on top of that would have added considerably to the cost, but I suspect that the astronomical cost-per-minute of services like Compuserve would be the killer.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    34. Re:outrageous by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      Nyet. Inside jokes are tough to determine from the outside. (Amusing, though, to all involved, for various reasons. And also there's no such thing as a lethal dose, but boy did the above-mentioned crew try to find one back in college! :)

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    35. Re:outrageous by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      There were nudie pics and porn passed around in the 80s, but it wasn't "the porn industry" that was behind it. It was individual users sharing with other friends/colleagues.

      It was the USERS that made the internet/ online communication popular in the 80s. The porn business deserves zero credit. It's also common to say the porn business made VHS successful and killed Betamax, but that too is a myth.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
  4. Well duh by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You make a movie that publicly flaunts that you were/are involved with mobsters (whether real or fictional), then wonder why legitimate businesses start backing away?

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Well duh by Peeteriz · · Score: 4, Informative

      Given the money that's there to be made, the legitimate business starts backing away only when the law requires to do so (TFA, new credit card act), involvement with mafia doesn't matter as long as Visa can legally pretend not to see it.

    2. Re:Well duh by timeOday · · Score: 1

      I agree Visa probably still wants the business. Mostly likely they'll patch up the issue with cash reloads (or whatever it is) that makes them attractive for money laundering and then be back to business as usual, which is fine.

    3. Re:Well duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so do you think the money I have in my epassporte account is not lost? It wouldn't be right that I lose money because of others doing wrong.

  5. That explanes it by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 1

    I thought my Visa card was over its limit.
    Thanks the porn gods for Mastercard.

    --
    If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    1. Re:That explanes it by Lehk228 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Master(bation)Card

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    2. Re:That explanes it by GrumblyStuff · · Score: 1

      So is it like a license or one of those 'Buy 10 subs, Get 1 free!" deals or what?

  6. Who the hell pays for pr0n? by Braintrust · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is there anything easier to find for free online?

    --
    Years later, a doctor will tell me that I have an I.Q. of 48, and am what some people call "mentally retarded".
    1. Re:Who the hell pays for pr0n? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I ask myself a similar question, who pays for all the new porn that is professionally made

    2. Re:Who the hell pays for pr0n? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you go and say that out loud? Those who somehow don't already know where to get it free are subsidizing us. Somebody has to pay for it, or all we'll get is amateur porn.
       
      ...upon further reflection, I don't really have a problem with that. Nevermind, carry on.

    3. Re:Who the hell pays for pr0n? by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      There's porn, and then then there's art (professional photography). I pay for at least one site simply because it's quality is better than the free stuff.
      .

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    4. Re:Who the hell pays for pr0n? by jpapon · · Score: 3, Informative

      I pay for at least one site simply because it's quality is better than the free stuff.

      I mean, I can appreciate production value as much as the next guy, but I'll take the hit & miss of sites like burningcamel.com, keezmovies.com, and so on before I make the mistake of giving my credit card to a porn site again. Those guys are almost universally crooks who will keep charging you until you just cancel your card and get a new number.

      --
      -- Let us endeavor so to live that when we pass even the undertaker shall be sorry. -- M. Twain
    5. Re:Who the hell pays for pr0n? by JustOK · · Score: 2, Informative

      hence, one use of prepaid cards...

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    6. Re:Who the hell pays for pr0n? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Actually I think they'll end up going like MyFreePaysite.com (purposely not linking as it'll get /.ed and I give that site the my "must have teh prons!" clients) where you can have all the professional porn you want for free, and they pay for it by ads for camsites, lubes and toys, etc.

      sadly the *.A.As can't seem to wrap their heads around the fact their 80s business model is dead, but sites like MyFreePaysite can find ways to monetize free just fine. In this case the content (the porn) is the lure to hopefully sell you that fleshlight/vibrator/camwhore that you WILL pay money for. Makes sense to me and it helps keep my more clueless porn surfing users from going to the more virus laden parts of the Internet. oh and in case anyone is wondering they have several video sites affiliated, with everything from 300k .ASF and .FLV all the way up to 1600k H.264 .AVIs, so formatting or picture quality isn't a problem.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    7. Re:Who the hell pays for pr0n? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmmm, Can you name a few more examples? ...You know, for a paper I'm writing for...college. Yes.

    8. Re:Who the hell pays for pr0n? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's probably a bad idea to give your real credit card number to any internet retailer. NewEgg has mine (Amazon might, too), but everyone else gets a virtual credit card number that expires in 2 months (could be 1 month if you really expect them to charge an unasked for monthly fee).

      That said, this article just highlights yet another reason why the US credit card validation system is horribly broken. Optimally, the credit card should be a smart card and should require a smart card reader to charge. Or maybe a manual login to your bank's website. The fact that the information they store is enough to charge your card is ridiculous.

    9. Re:Who the hell pays for pr0n? by cervo · · Score: 1

      Well some bill paying companies are independent of the porn sites. Guys like verotel, ccbill, etc... Which are big payment companies with account management/cancel options as part of the payment processor. So you can just login and cancel your subscription without a hassle.

      It's like anything else. I generally stick to guys like Amazon, etc. when using my credit card on the internet, or even paypal. As opposed to Joe's cheap cheap cheap electronics, serial number not included.....

    10. Re:Who the hell pays for pr0n? by hkmwbz · · Score: 1
      How is the quality better? The models look better? The images are more professional?

      A lot of people actually prefer amateur porn. The models are everyday girls, and the images may be hit and miss, but a lot find it to be much better than the professional stuff.

      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
  7. no worries... by Kristopeit,+Michael · · Score: 4, Informative
    i was pissed when paypal did this to me in 2000... so i switched to neteller, then i was pissed when neteller did it to me in 2006, then i switched to epassporte, now i'll switch to one of the other major providers... most support the "pulse" network instead of visa or mastercard, and almost every ATM works with pulse.

    nothing to see here except visa losing out on a lot of business because they let the government dictate how they do legal business in the name of stopping potential crime.

    shame on you visa. you are pathetic.

    1. Re:no worries... by ravenspear · · Score: 3, Informative

      Pulse is national payment network that processes most debit card transactions in the US.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pulse_(interbank_network)

    2. Re:no worries... by fusiongyro · · Score: 1

      Look on the back of all your ATM cards. I bet you have one with the Pulse logo.

    3. Re:no worries... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha, ha! You lose! Only NYCE.

    4. Re:no worries... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you did not parse is response correctly,to me it was a truthful interrogation

    5. Re:no worries... by Kristopeit,+Michael · · Score: 1, Funny
      did you do anything correctly in your response?

      you too are an idiot.

    6. Re:no worries... by flimflammer · · Score: 1

      I haven't seen Pulse on any of my cards in years.

    7. Re:no worries... by Antisyzygy · · Score: 1

      Uhh. Visa is trying to obey the law. If they don't then they will probably get fined. If they don't pay it then they will have the Sheriff or Feds seizing stuff from them.

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    8. Re:no worries... by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Used to be about 9 logos on the back of one of my cards. Now I just assume the one or two that are there are the ones still willing to pay for the space. There's still a raft of stickers on the ATMs.

    9. Re:no worries... by Kristopeit,+Michael · · Score: 0

      uhh... disrupting free legal trade shouldn't be something the feds can force on anyone. visa laid down like a bitch.

    10. Re:no worries... by jcrousedotcom · · Score: 1

      I just looked at the back of my Bank of America Visa logo'd Debit ATM card and I have a Pulse logo. BoA is one of the larger (largest?) banks in the US... I would think many others would carry that logo as well?

      --
      Illiterate? Write for free help!
    11. Re:no worries... by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      I got "Interac", "Plus" and "NYCE" logos. I don't recall ever seeing the NYCE logo on any ATM either. The Interac logo, on the other hand, is everywhere I go.

    12. Re:no worries... by Firehed · · Score: 1

      Fined? Violation of AML laws can result in arrest, with some pretty severe punishments. Same with failure to follow the Know-Your-Customer guidelines. Anti-terrorism, and all that.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    13. Re:no worries... by Antisyzygy · · Score: 1

      I wasn't sure what the consequence was, but my point was its in the interest of a company like Visa to obey the law if they want to stay in business long term.

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    14. Re:no worries... by Rophuine · · Score: 5, Informative

      I was a software engineer working in a company which had a similar thing done to it by MasterCard (MC from here on). The circumstances may be similar or vastly different, but the program which triggered it was used mainly by online gambling services, and we provided customers with Maestro/Cirrus branded MCs.

      The product was ostensibly a prepaid debit card for travellers. The melt-down started when an MC official at an international event received marketing material for the card, and called the help-desk. He was told all about the benefits of the card, including the ‘special’ benefits like being able to load gambling winnings onto it and then withdraw them as cash from US ATMs (I should stress that this was a program operated by our client, not by us; we were just the platform.)

      It turns out that this is money-laundering. You just aren’t allowed to market that. So our client (who operated the program) was investigated, and then we (who owned the payment platform) were also investigated. While a handful of people were using the program legitimately, the vast majority were using it for its ‘special’ benefits. MC also found that we should have known about it, and we’d failed to do correct due diligence. The program was shut down immediately, and all cards were de-activated, as its primary purpose was to facilitate money-laundering (we received two hours’ warning, and I had a federal police officer standing behind me while I signed in and deactivated the card range). We lost our licence to access the MC network, and MC gave us 30 days to notify customers of legitimate programs and disconnect. We were successful in getting a court order extending this to 180 days.

      MC has strict risk guidelines on this sort of thing. The integrity of the network is paramount: illegal money flows are targeted and stamped out vehemently. They would rather risk disconnecting thousands of legitimate cards than risk losing trust in a network which provides for billions of them.

      The real problem is that it’s all private enterprise. Our contract with MC gave them all of these powers: if you don’t want to let MC have this sort of power over you, you don’t use their network. There is no right of appeal, especially for international partners (the court’s authority to even grant the time extension for our genuine legal programs was tenuous, and was only enforceable due to MC wanting to be nice to another party in the chain who was subject to Australian law).

      I hope this is interesting information. If you want to know how the story ends, join the club: it’s still going. Perhaps you can visit David Tzvetkoff in a US prison and ask him if he knows.

      I suppose what it really gets back to is that VISA is probably not doing this to comply with laws. They know that the best money for an organisation their size is to be made in massive, highly-trusted networks which are beyond reproach. They kick anyone off who might give them any kind of a smudge. Not just pr0n, obviously, I'm talking about money-laundering-style smudges. Which is not, of course, to say that this is what ePassporte was doing: there was neither trial nor opportunity to defend when MC came after us. It was "we're on our way, be ready to turn them off in front of a federal police officer when we arrive." They didn't have to prove that our client was doing anything wrong. They didn't have to prove that we should have known about it. They just decided that they were satisfied, end of story. We only got the extension from the court because they found that MC hadn't met the requirements under the contract to terminate with 30 days notice, and they had to fall back to the "we can kick you off just because we don't like the brand of office chairs you buy" 180 days.

    15. Re:no worries... by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      shame on you visa. you are pathetic.

      Don't you mean "Shame on you Mr. President and US Congress. You are pathetic."

      I mean, it only seems fair, since the only reason VISA is doing this is the anti-laundering provisions in the Credit Card Act of 2009. Do you think VISA wants to stop making money or something?

      P.S.: If you can bother to hit the shift key for ATM, why can't you bother to hit it for the first letter in every sentence? It isn't hard, and you'll come off as less immature if you do. Just saying.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    16. Re:no worries... by Kristopeit,+Michael · · Score: 0

      Don't you mean "Shame on you Mr. President and US Congress. You are pathetic."

      actually, i didn't, asshole.

      didn't you mean to say you're the pathetic coward?

      "When Injustice Becomes Law - Resistance Becomes Duty"
      -Thomas Jefferson

      suck my toes.

      you are NOTHING

    17. Re:no worries... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      They are asserting that they can't, by law, accept business from places that deal in adult material. And that's simply false.

    18. Re:no worries... by Antisyzygy · · Score: 1

      If that is in fact the case then I disagree with what they did.

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    19. Re:no worries... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know US politicians, lawyers, judges and lawmen can not accept this reality, but it is coming for them and their nation.
      All information and financial services will be leaving the United States soon, the backlash, and loss of profit is becoming unavoidable at this point.
      Craig Newmark of Craigs list looses money everyday he continues to be a US citizen and operate inside the United States
      Internet Websites at this point have a litany of punishing US Federal regulations imposed upon them by over-zealous politicians and prosecuted by Attorney Generals with Political Motivation.

      I'm posting this not to go, hey guys we need to fix this, but to instead laugh and mock as those in the US squeeze even tighter as more of the business and money flows overseas.
      Support the country on your political speeches with lofty ideation, pay for the food and mortgages with good intentions, make it a scumbag John Walsh speech of fury see how that pays for infrastructure

      So the Indians (the real ones in India) aren't too creative at writing code and making movies, but the Japanese and Chinese couldn't make a damn thing above dime-store quality 30 years ago either.
      The time has come, we've past the point of no return. I laugh at all the 3 strikes, zero tolerance, anti-drug, don't be curious, you hurt my feelings laws cripple the country.
      Americans welcome to the 21 Century, you are destined to fall faster than the English did, and to lose more than even the Romans before you.

      The R.Lee Emery psychologist commercial is a good 30 second example of this new cowardice United States
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=APwfZYO1di4

    20. Re:no worries... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so does anyone know if i will ever be able to get the money i have in my epassporte account out?

    21. Re:no worries... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet another shining example of an immense profundity uttered by the incalculable troll Michael David Kristopeit. Truly, what would we do without him?

    22. Re:no worries... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      did you do anything correctly in your response?

      He got you to reply. The more you reply, the more foolish you look, so this is a pretty good tactic as far as arguing with you goes.

    23. Re:no worries... by M.+Kristopeit · · Score: 0
      just because you can't calculate simple logic doesn't mean i should dumb myself down for your benefit.

      you're an idiot.

    24. Re:no worries... by Kristopeit,+Michael · · Score: 0
      the truth is "troll"

      slashdot = stagnated

  8. Speaking as a former dating site peon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    This kind of thing happens all the time for companies handling payment processing for adult sites. IIRC Chargeback rates tend to be pretty bad, and made worse by actual billing scams on the seedier sites; so while they're lucrative customers for the banks, they're also prone to falling foul of regulatory limits and having their merchant accounts suspended. The movie tie-in is probably the only reason this is considered newsworthy.

  9. It's safe to say.... by kenrblan · · Score: 1

    It's safe to say this isn't the first time porn webmasters have seen a plug pulled.

    --
    Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler. - Albert Einstein
  10. "Adult"? by White+Flame · · Score: 0, Troll

    So if I'm an adult, and I'm a webmaster, how does this affect me? Stop abusing this word.

    I'm drinking without drinking alcohol.
    I'm gaming without gambling.
    My adult media content is not adolescent gratuitousness, but challenging and informative content that requires some life experience to appreciate.
    My adult language is educated and domain terminology that children might not understand yet.

    1. Re:"Adult"? by Lehk228 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      fuck that, i'm having a scotch and playing poker with nude women.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    2. Re:"Adult"? by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 1

      I'm drinking without drinking alcohol.
      I'm gaming without gambling.
      My adult media content is not adolescent gratuitousness, but challenging and informative content that requires some life experience to appreciate.
      My adult language is educated and domain terminology that children might not understand yet.

      Ooh, is this a riddle? Lemme guess: you're a troll!

      --
      by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
    3. Re:"Adult"? by White+Flame · · Score: 1

      Thank you! Now, if others would follow suit in actually speaking directly like that, the world would be that little bit of a better place. :)

    4. Re:"Adult"? by White+Flame · · Score: 1

      Nah, just whining a bit. It's a real irritation when your innocuous actions fit a misappropriated label.

  11. Also, poker. by pspahn · · Score: 1

    And not in the rear.

    While I haven't played online poker for money in several years, I know that I had to switch to ePassporte at one point because Neteller was longer supported in the US.

    For some reason, I highly doubt that this move by Visa was solely because of Porn. And now I'm seeing from Poker Stars that ePassporte is no longer an option, I have no idea when this happened.

    Shame, too, as I have a lot of tuition to pay for and was thinking about getting back into it to help pay for all the money I would otherwise have to create via alchemy. (And yes, I have a job, work 30-50 hours a week, pay rent, and all that other good stuff).

    --
    Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    1. Re:Also, poker. by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Alchemy?

      Student loans stopped existing?

    2. Re:Also, poker. by pspahn · · Score: 1

      Well, thanks to University of Phoenix, I might not have access to my loan until Spring. I withdrew from there to enroll at a good school, and was informed that there was a conflict with the dates and moving my aid from one school to another.

      Phoenix told me when I withdrew that I would have to pay for those classes out of pocket, which I decided to just bite the bullet on since I wanted out ASAP. However, they subsequently proceeded to use my aid money to pay for them anyway.

      I'm working on fixing the situation, but am planning on having a bake sale to raise funds for the 2010 Fall semester.

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    3. Re:Also, poker. by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      Put me down for a cookie.

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    4. Re:Also, poker. by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Hmm.

      They had no right to use one of those sets of funds, but they did anyway. Conversion. It's like theft except that they had a right to possess the property temporarily, just not to use it for what they used it for.

      Should take about 5 minutes to fix. Call UoP, ask for whatever they call their Director of Financial Aid and Ancilliary Frauds, and tell him you're calling the state A.G.'s office if they don't have a check in your hand by the end of the week. Then if they don't, call the state A.G.'s office.

      They may squawk that it's an administrative mistake that will take time to correct, but you should say so what, that's their problem and they need to put your money into your hand now and work out their internal account balancing on their own time.

    5. Re:Also, poker. by pspahn · · Score: 1

      Thanks. I just found out about this last week, and have been working with both schools to fix it. I was requested by Regis to get a signed letter from Phoenix saying they cancelled the funds. After a couple hours and back and forth phone calls between the different departments (that kept pushing the onus onto other depts) they said I would have my letter in 24-48 hours. A week went by and still no letter, so I called them again and had it by the end of the day.

      The funniest part, is that I keep getting spam from Phoenix asking me to sign a petition. Here's some text:

      Today I'm writing to ask you to take a simple but important step in making sure the voices of our university community are heard.

      Please sign this petition asking President Obama to protect access to higher education for all students in the nation.

      As you may know, some leaders in Washington are proposing regulations that could affect our university and restrict students' options within higher education. I want to make sure that the national conversation about University of Phoenix includes the voices of the people who know it best -- hardworking students like you.

      Regulations could prevent students at for-profit schools like University of Phoenix -- and only schools like ours -- from having the same access to grants and student loans as traditional universities. Under these new rules, students could still get aid for community colleges, state schools, and private universities -- schools that don't all share our philosophy that everyone deserves the opportunity to go to college.

      As you know better than anyone, if our students can't have equal access to student loans, that's going to block hundreds of thousands of Americans from getting the college education they need and deserve to get ahead in their jobs or find even better jobs.

      Please sign this petition to President Obama, asking him to protect access to higher education for all students, especially working adults from diverse backgrounds like so many of our students. Join thousands of students, alumni, staff, and faculty who are speaking out about the value of their education at University of Phoenix and the critical role that it is playing in your current career or in the career you intend to pursue.

      I am considering starting an active petition to oppose this one. It's such utter bullshit and this proposed legislation is actually giving me a reason to support Obama, who I'm not a big fan of otherwise. I will also hand $10 to anyone I meet that is considering going to UoPx if they agree to not attend and choose something else.

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
  12. Good! Affiliate marketing should die. by tomhudson · · Score: 1, Troll

    and a raft of other affiliate programs

    It's the source of a lot of click fraud, clickjacking attacks, spam, doorway page websites, etc.

    I blame it on Amazon, who first pushed this as a way for ordinary people to "monetize their web site" back in the early 90s.

    1. Re:Good! Affiliate marketing should die. by sortius_nod · · Score: 1

      Do you seriously think this restriction by VISA will stop all the attacks you mentioned? I highly doubt it. It's just forced porn sites and the like to use processing companies that they haven't built a relationship with yet.

      Aside from this, who uses pay for porn sites?

    2. Re:Good! Affiliate marketing should die. by Dogtanian · · Score: 2, Informative

      I blame it on Amazon, who first pushed this as a way for ordinary people to "monetize their web site" back in the early 90s.

      I assume you mean the late 90s or early 2000s; the web was launched in 1990, but it wasn't until around 1994 that it started taking off (with very little commercialism at that time), and Amazon themselves didn't launch until '95!

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    3. Re:Good! Affiliate marketing should die. by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      In 95 they were already doing affiliate marketing. One of my friends mentioned it and I said "That is stupid. You only get paid if you make a sale, but you're supplying the bandwidth, etc. And if someone goes back to the site afterwards instaed of passing through you, you get nothing."

      Today. people hijack the persistent cookies so that they get credit even if you were the first one that sent a particular person to Amazon. Very profitable for the scammers, not so much for everyone else.

      It's a suckers model. You don't see advertising companies (newspapers, billboards, direct mail, radio, tv) offering the same deal to advertisers. They say "you pay to advertise. The effectiveness is your problem - if your product sucks or your ad campaign is poorly implemented, that's your responsibility."

    4. Re:Good! Affiliate marketing should die. by Xaositecte · · Score: 1

      the same sort of people who seriously think they can get a part of some Nigerian Prince's fortune, or buy penis enlargement.

    5. Re:Good! Affiliate marketing should die. by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      Today. people hijack the persistent cookies so that they get credit even if you were the first one that sent a particular person to Amazon.

      Yes, because ever since person X got to Amazon through my site back in '95, ALL purchases that person ever makes in his entire live should be credited to me.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  13. I thought .... by PPH · · Score: 0, Troll

    ... paying to have your plug pulled was against the law.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  14. Just something to think about by hellfire · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We had a customer recently who we sold credit card software to. We sell this software to many varying businesses. They are a legitimate business, they just happen to distribute adult DVDs. However, they lied on their form on their merchant bank, and the bank found out and cut them off, and they were unable process cards. After this dramatic happenstance, they then turn around and shopped around for a new merchant bank, but could not, because of the very reason they lied in the first place... because they were worried that if they told the truth no one would take them on.

    Now it wasn't right to lie, but they didn't lie in order to launder money, they lied because they would not be taken as a serious business otherwise, and I don't know about you but I think they have that right to be taken seriously. They were let go because banks are adverse to taking a risk on any type of business like this simply in name only. Sure, there are plenty of criminal organizations dealing in porn, but there are plenty of legitimate ones too. Human beings, especially Americans, overreact to porn and sex and try to marginalize it as something demonic. When you marginalize it, you get a group of people who are willing to work with it with varying levels of morals outside of the normal. Mostly you get two kinds of people, those who think porn is perfectly acceptable, and those who think anything including criminal activity is acceptable as long as it makes money. Then less than moral companies sprout up to help the immoral and moral alike deal with this kind of business, you get moral groups popping up saying "See! porn is bad! look at all the criminal activity it breeds!" and you continue the vicious cycle.

    So because banks are scared of the adult industry in general because we marginalize it, and by marginalizing it we make it prone to criminal behavior and banks don't want to take the chance, legitimate or not, so we end up with bullshit like this, businesses that are guilty by association and nothing else.

    Morality... meh.

    --

    "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

    1. Re:Just something to think about by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      So because banks are scared of the adult industry in general because we marginalize it, and by marginalizing it we make it prone to criminal behavior and banks don't want to take the chance, legitimate or not, so we end up with bullshit like this, businesses that are guilty by association and nothing else.

      I'm sorry, your conclusion is flat-out wrong. You had a customer who committed fraud, was found out about their fraud, and was then not allowed to commit the same level of fraud in the future. This has nothing to do with porn or morality: it has to do with the actions of your customer, who decided that speaking fraudulently was preferable to being honest.

      I think the reaction to your customer's decision is appropriate.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    2. Re:Just something to think about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So change the name use a third company to charge ie subsidy or some other bs to get around it

    3. Re:Just something to think about by White+Flame · · Score: 1

      You used "morality" and "bank" in the same context.

      Are you sure the porn industry doesn't have something like a higher credit card purchasing fraud rate by its customers, which makes servicing their accounts unprofitable?

    4. Re:Just something to think about by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's not because the banks marginalise it, it's because adult processing has a chargeback rate significantly higher than most other business types, so of course they'll be paranoid about it. Also, the reason that client of your couldn't find a new bank is because when they were terminated for lying on the application, they would have been added to the TMF and therefore every other potential provider can see that they have been blacklisted once, and why.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    5. Re:Just something to think about by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      You had a customer who committed fraud,

      Fraud is lying for gain at the expense of others. What harm did they cause anyone else by lying about what they were selling? If none, then they did lie, but didn't commit fraud.

    6. Re:Just something to think about by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      You're really asking what harm they caused? (I say that because I have respect for you.)

      Economic harm, of course; the end result of their fraud is that the review system now needs to be a bit more thorough, so that it can detect liars like these. Which means increased costs for all other players -- so yes, they did gain at the expense of others.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    7. Re:Just something to think about by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      What economic harm? They claimed they sold something (say, Disney DVDs) while they really sold porn. They sold items. They processed credit cards on those sales. The credit card company made money. The seller made money. The buyer got their porn. No one saw harm.

      At best, I could see an argument that they "stole" risk. But you can't steal risk. It's not something that you take from someone. But they did not economically disadvantage the other side at all, and even made them profit, so I can't see an argument that they caused them economic harm. Perhaps if you argued that they would have been charged more if they were honest, but I'd counter that you'd need to prove they would have taken their business if they were honest, otherwise there is no loss.

    8. Re:Just something to think about by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      Hmm, sorry, by "economic harm" I meant "harm to the economy", not "financial harm to individuals/companies". Note that I'm not saying that they're not a valid business; I personally don't buy into porn thanks to having spent some time with a heart biofeedback device, and can now make things happen just by thinking (which is, by itself, a very, very cool thing, but I digress).

      It's clear that they lied; it's clear that there are legal reasons for the credit card company to behave the way they do, even if those reasons aren't ethical or moral; and it's clear that the credit card company now knows about the lying, and will need to take steps (if they really care about this particular "risk") in order to detect this lying by future applicants. This adds to the expenses of the credit card company, and when the news is shared, will add to the expenses of every credit card company. These costs are passed along to the consumers in the form of increased fees or interest rates on loans. That's what I meant by "the review system now need to be a bit more thorough" -- the review system in place at every company that takes these types of applications, not solely the review system at the credit card company in question.

      Sure, my argument may be somewhat "specious" because it could be argued that this is a drop in the bucket, but enough drops cause the bucket to overflow, so even if it is just a drop, my argument is that this drop carries some weight, going back to your original response that they lied but didn't commit fraud -- I maintain that adding costs to the system makes their behavior fraudulent.

      I really like being able to have these types of discussions, as well, so thank you, Slashdot. :)

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    9. Re:Just something to think about by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Hmm, sorry, by "economic harm" I meant "harm to the economy", not "financial harm to individuals/companies".

      To sue, one must be harmed. The economy can't sue people. As such, actionable fraud doesn't occur if one harms the economy rather than a specific person who can point to harm they received.

      Sure, my argument may be somewhat "specious" because it could be argued that this is a drop in the bucket, but enough drops cause the bucket to overflow, so even if it is just a drop, my argument is that this drop carries some weight, going back to your original response that they lied but didn't commit fraud -- I maintain that adding costs to the system makes their behavior fraudulent.

      They add costs to the system because someone voluntarily adds that costs to them. There's no reason they aren't served with the same level of service as a Disney DVD outlet. If they were, then there's no need to lie. They aren't served like a Disney DVD outlet. Lying to say they are one, then performing actual actions in line with what one would do (paying on time, chargebacks of a reasonable level, etc.) incurs no actual cost. That there are means in order to keep people "like that" from doing what they did has no effect on the actual costs their lie caused. Those checks are there whether or not they lie. You can't sue a burglar for the cost of the locks when he broke a window to get in. That the locks are there to stop burglars and that you were burgled anyway doesn't make the burglar responsible for the initial install costs of the locks you chose to install of your own free will regardless of whether you are then burgled in the future.

  15. Nope, not surprising by rickb928 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    These new 'money-laundering' rules are going to impact merchants and processors significantly. Visa is probably happy to be rid of a business with massive fraud, payment issues, and scams on every corner.

    Next up will be gambling sites, mostly the poker sites which in general should be burnt off the Web for the faurds they commit, not to mention the money-laundering potential. Imagine watching user A play like a fool and lose $100k to user B, knowing all along this is the equivalent of wiring the money to user B and suffering the house's rake as cost of shuffling the funds. This is an international problem, and the only thing that stops this from happening more is that 'legitimate' poker sites do everything to keep you from actually receiving your winnings. A poker site built to facilitate laundering wouldn't bother with that nonsense, but it would discourage players other than the intended 'clientele' from playing big-stakes games (probably by using a buy-in or premium membership to keep the riffraff out) and thereby preventing unexpected players from receiving funds expected to just be 'won' by the laundering destination.

    Amazingly creative these people are. The 'legitimate' poker sites rake enough, and of course are mostly pure scams, with bots hammering on live players and some people making money a few bucks at a time. The fraud and disputes are rampant, and most processors want nothing to do with this business, so they have holdbacks and huge discount rates and fees if they bother at all. Being offshore makes matters worse, and users in the U.S. for instance will have no help from anybody collecting their winnings, so they often dispute their membership fees and such, with the predictable result that the site essentially survives by scamming its users while the users are scamming each other. There is no good in online poker. None.

    This is one of the darker corners of the Web. These 'money-laundering' rules will impact these businesses a lot.

    And, of course, these rules will also aid in collecting taxes. The IRS is in the midst of implementing rules to use credit card processors to provide payment data which is matched to the merchants' tax reporting. If something is wrong, the IRS has the power to garnish the intended credit card payments and deliver them to the business only if they agree that the taxes were collected and all is well. And if there is a problem with the merchant's records, and the processor has some typo or error in the merchant's files, they have to send the money to the IRS and the merchant may^H^H^Hwill wait for an entire quarter to get their money back, less anything the IRS decides to withold. I say 'money-laundering' because a lot of the motivation here by the government is to get more data and get into the payment streams.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    1. Re:Nope, not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What a load of bullshit. Thousands of people make a lot of money online, and you can track them on sites like officialpokerrankings.com or pokertabletatings.com. There are online communities like twoplustwo.com or pocketfives.com where most of the top winners are well known in real life. High end laundering as you describe would be tracked and easily noticed by a large community that follows the "nosebleed" games. It is also (still) very easy to get winnings off, if it wasn't people would stop playing.

      "Mostly pure scams"... no evidence, no citations, how on earth did this get +5 insightful.

    2. Re:Nope, not surprising by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      Amazingly creative these people are.

      Ok Yoda, whatever you say.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
  16. Free porn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yet another reason to not pay for any porn, ever. There is so much free stuff, and going on the hunt for hi-res pics of your favorite model is such a great hobby! (sob)

  17. if you are a cam model... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The underground economy of cam models will be hard hit.
    Some of those models (the best ones) might earn a couple grand per month.
    Mind you some of those models are in the good old USA... as well as ALL over the world.

    The pressure will be huge to come up with an alternative payment method that is not as expensive as Western Union or bank transfers. /so I heard from a friend of a friend...

  18. Legislature makes jurisdiction by defenition. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They create the definitions for those words when they are used as "terms" in a contract.

    It sucks, they re-define words for a certain premise that does more to aid prosecution or default a
    party to maintain the dispute rather than anything helpful.

    All of it is admiralty in commerce clauses when you restrictively endorse their wrath against the people.

  19. Porn Processing by RWarrior(fobw) · · Score: 4, Informative
    It's incredibly difficult (and expensive) to get credit card processing for an adult entertainment business, and the cartels (Visa/MC/Discover/Amex) don't want to make it easier. In my three years' work for a site dealing with just this kind of issue, here's what I found:
    • You pretty much can't get processing in your own business name if you're up-front about what you do, in the United States.
    • You can't get processing in Europe, either, unless you're actually in the EU. Opening a shell corporation won't help, and even then, it's also impossible.
    • You might be able to get "high risk" processing outside of the United States, out of somewhere like Vietnam or the Philippines. If you do, you can expect games with your money.
    • You can expect to have your bank hold on to your funds a minimum of three months. This is not something like a 5% rolling reserve. It is, instead, a 100% rolling reserve.
    • You can expect your contract to say that when you end your contract (even at the end of term in the normal course of business), your processor can hold onto 100% of your money for an additional year, starting as soon as you give your required six months notice.
    • You can expect your contract to say that you surrender your domain name to your processor in perpetuity.
    • You can expect to pay as much as 25% of revenue for this "service."
    • You can expect to find it impossible to open even a normal checking account into which to deposit your funds, because no bank in the universe will want to deal with you, simply because you run an adult business.
    • About the only semi-reputable (caveat emptor) business that will do billing for adult websites is CCBill. You can expect to pay CCBill at LEAST 10% of your revenue, and if you want to take Visa, you have to pony up another $750 non-refundable startup fee, and a $500 annual fee, on top. Approximately 40% of adult transactions are Visa, so not accepting Visa isn't a viable option for most businesses.
    • CCB's software absolutely sucks. It is bloated, slow, doesn't give good control over affiliates and their production, and doesn't produce usable reports. And, I have never once given an email address to CCBill (yes, I use unique addresses for such transactions) that didn't get sold to a spammer. This includes addresses I gave to them in a business relationship, not just buying a website subscription.
    • Verified by Visa and MasterCard SecureCode, which are supposed to eliminate chargebacks, are not available to adult entertainment sites. No explanation has ever been given about why this is so, but if you run porn, you can't use these "enhanced security" services.
    • CCBill supports only subscription-based services. They don't support physical good sales. Want to sell DVDs, t-shirts, photographic prints, USB keychains, or other goods along with your site subscriptions? Too bad.
    • No well-known payment service aside from CCBill allows porn. This includes PayPal, Google Checkout, Moneybookers, and the rest. Want to sell legal second-hand DVDs on eBay? Good luck figuring out how to get paid. I have a warehouse full of stuff I basically can't sell because I can't get paid.

    One of the reasons problems are so rampant in credit card processing in adult entertainment is that the cartels have made it nearly impossible to get legitimate processing, and so businesses that want to take credit cards have to resort to quasi-legal tactics to be able to run them. It becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.

    One of the things I looked into was the possibility of creating, essentially, a pornographer's bank. The bank would adhere to customary American banking law, but would explicitly accept legal adult entertainment business. The question we co

    --
    Remove the caps and hold to a mirror.
  20. Bull. All it takes is approx $75M by cheros · · Score: 1

    It is PERFECTLY possible to set up an alternative to Visa and Mastercard. The only reason no-one has managed yet is because the cost of a new hardware rollout would be prohibitive - if you were silly enough to try and replicate a model which is 15 years old and no longer needed (so you don't, basically). Visa/Mastercard don't care about fraud losses because they have you paying for it in transaction fees.

    However, you need a sponsor who can cough up approx $75M or so to set up the first business. In 3 years that will have enough users to richly repay that investor many times over- because users want it (I actually have quite a few retailers who would immediately join as clients). If $75M looks a lot, Visa & Mastercard turn something like 4..6 TRILLION dollars a year. If you don't hit a billion turnover in year 3 you've been asleep..

    --
    Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.