Slashdot Mirror


Brazil Considering Legalizing File Sharing

An anonymous reader writes "It looks like Brazil may be the country to watch if you're interested in much more consumer-friendly copyright laws (assuming US diplomatic pressure doesn't interfere). As that country goes through a copyright reform process, among the proposals is one that would create fines not just for infringing, but also for hindering fair use and the public domain. Also, there is a big push underway, with widespread support — even from some artists groups — to legalize file sharing in exchange for a small levy (~$1.74/month) on your broadband connection. Of course, one reason why Brazil may be doing it this way is because of the massive success the Brazilian musical genre technobrega has had by embracing file sharing as a way to promote new works, and making money (often lots of it) through other avenues, like live shows."

3 of 233 comments (clear)

  1. Re:File sharing is already legal by Andorin · · Score: 4, Informative

    The distinction is both important and meaningless. File sharing itself is not illegal, but the term is usually applied to what the protocols are used for: copyright infringement. It's a much less loaded term than "piracy" when used in a formal sense.

    --
    That Anonymous Coward guy is pretty annoying. Can we have the government censor him or something?
  2. Re:No more HollyWood films in ... by h4rr4r · · Score: 5, Informative

    Unless they fix their wealth distribution don't expect too much. I would love to see them do well, but when a couple people ride around in helicoptors and children starve in favelas, it leads to crime, corruption and many of the other problems that plague latin America.

    The USA will do anything it can to make sure Brazil is safe for US corporations, knocking off a legally elected politician is only the tip of that iceberg.

  3. The truth about copyright by devent · · Score: 4, Informative

    Was copyright invented by writers and artists, to protect themselves?
    No. Actually, it was invented by publishers, to preserve an information ownership monopoly based on a government censorship policy.
    Do musicians, writers, and artists depend on copyright to earn a living?
    The vast majority of musicians, writers, and artists will never see a dime of copyright royalties in their lives.
    Is copying a copyrighted work the same as stealing it?
    If I steal your bicycle, now you have no bicycle. If I copy your song, now we both have it.
    Would creativity dry up without copyright?
    If there had been no worthwhile or enduring artistic work produced before copyright, this would be a more plausible argument. But the world before modern copyright was hardly a barren cultural desert: Homer, Chaucer, Shakespeare, J.S. Bach, Li Bo, Leonardo Da Vinci, Michelangelo...

    Inform yourself on http://questioncopyright.org/faq, as a bonus you can download a free movie Sita Sings the Blues

    --
    http://www.mueller-public.de - My site http://www.anr-institute.com/ - Advanced Natural Research Institute