Slashdot Mirror


Tractor Beams Come To Life

Jamie is helping bring our childhood fantasies/nightmares to life with a link that says "Andrei Rhode, a researcher involved with the project, said that existing optical tweezers are able to move particles the size of a bacterium a few millimeters in a liquid. Their new technique can move objects one hundred times that size over a distance of a meter or more."

127 comments

  1. Pfft. by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Until the bacterium reroute the main power conduits through the deflector beam to create an inverse tachyon pulse. Then what?

    1. Re:Pfft. by AnonymousClown · · Score: 1

      Until the bacterium reroute the main power conduits through the deflector beam to create an inverse tachyon pulse. Then what?

      That's assuming they can use their collective consciousness to organize to do that.

      --
      RIP America

      July 4, 1776 - September 11, 2001

    2. Re:Pfft. by pmontra · · Score: 1

      Reversing the polarity is easier.

    3. Re:Pfft. by Abstrackt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Until the bacterium reroute the main power conduits through the deflector beam to create an inverse tachyon pulse. Then what?

      I think you meant deflector array. Otherwise there's no way such a silly thing could happen. :p

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    4. Re:Pfft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until the bacterium reroute the main power conduits through the deflector beam to create an inverse tachyon pulse. Then what?

      Like putting too much air in a balloon!

    5. Re:Pfft. by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Doesn't matter, we're all stuck in the holodeck.

    6. Re:Pfft. by ultranova · · Score: 1

      That's assuming they can use their collective consciousness to organize to do that.

      Why not? Your brain cells are doing just that. How's it feel to be the collective consciousness of a bunch of unicellular clones?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    7. Re:Pfft. by cygnwolf · · Score: 1

      That's not reassuring, the safety interlocks are off.

      --
      Free Pie! The Pie is Also Evil!
    8. Re:Pfft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I'm sure Data will come up with something about the 35 minutes after the crisis is identified.

    9. Re:Pfft. by kdemetter · · Score: 1

      Yes , and we could call them "The Borg" , but that would be a trademark violation.

    10. Re:Pfft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just don't cross the beams. Oh, wrong movie, sorry

    11. Re:Pfft. by jpedlow · · Score: 1

      ITS OK,

      Professor Moriarty will save us.

      if not, then my friend Reg Barkley will hook his brain into the holodeck and become the new computer core. he's always on the holodeck anyway, right guys?

    12. Re:Pfft. by syousef · · Score: 1

      Until the bacterium reroute the main power conduits through the deflector beam to create an inverse tachyon pulse. Then what?

      Is there any way to turn the tacky off?

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    13. Re:Pfft. by Modern+Primate · · Score: 1

      Insightful? Seriously?

    14. Re:Pfft. by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

      Until the bacterium reroute the main power conduits through the deflector beam to create an inverse tachyon pulse. Then what?

      I think you meant deflector array. Otherwise there's no way such a silly thing could happen. :p

      Hear me out, commander. If we modulate the signal, we can use the deflector beam as a carrier wave, and get a signal to , who can then relay the signal to Starbase 352.

    15. Re:Pfft. by CeruleanDragon · · Score: 1

      Insightful? Who the heck modded this Insightful? It's *funny* but I wouldn't call it Insightful, geez.

      --
      ad astra per alia porci
  2. Agriculture by beschra · · Score: 1

    For some reason I thought of farm implements when I saw "tractor." Didn't make a whole lot of sense.

    --
    It is unwise to ascribe motive
    1. Re:Agriculture by BitHive · · Score: 1

      No kidding. This should've been called a 'tweezer beam'

    2. Re:Agriculture by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Han Solo: "We're caught in a tweezer beam, it's pulling us in!"

      No, it just doesn't work. Just doesn't set up the scene correctly at all.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    3. Re:Agriculture by natehoy · · Score: 1

      Lone Star: "We're caught in a tweezer beam, it's pulling us in!"

      Does that work better?

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    4. Re:Agriculture by SEWilco · · Score: 3, Funny

      Han Solo: "We're caught in a tweezer beam, it's pulling us in!" No, it just doesn't work. Just doesn't set up the scene correctly at all.

      Sure it does. A maid with a vacuum cleaner large enough to destroy a planet would also have a tweezer beam large enough for one little ship.

    5. Re:Agriculture by ultranova · · Score: 1

      So... Why did the Death Star capture Millenium Falcon? They destroyed Alderaan to invoke terror; wouldn't they want as many ships as possible to spread the word that it's gone?

      Mr. Lucas, is this another instance of making someone else shoot first?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    6. Re:Agriculture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It might work in the porn industry...

    7. Re:Agriculture by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      They knew the plans for the death star were on that ship and since a high ranking politician was on board they couldn't just destroy it right away.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    8. Re:Agriculture by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Now that they have a tractor beam, will a trailor beam come soon?

    9. Re:Agriculture by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      (Wil Wheaton quotes a Star Wars line)
      Sheldon: That's not even your franchise!

      [Okay, Spaceballs was a parody of Wars, so this kind of fits.]

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    10. Re:Agriculture by ultranova · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They knew the plans for the death star were on that ship and since a high ranking politician was on board they couldn't just destroy it right away.

      What high-ranking politician? The only people on the ship at that point were Obi-Wan, Luke, Han, Chewie, R2-D2 and 3-CPO. None of them were politicians.

      Besides, if the Empire was willing to blow up an entire planet, I doubt they'd spare a ship either. It simply doesn't make sense. Unless, of course, Han shot first and Lucas simply cut that from the movie.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  3. Strangely drawn to this story... by jrmcc · · Score: 5, Funny

    can't quite figure out why?

    1. Re:Strangely drawn to this story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Because it's a shitty title to a story about advances in optical tweezers which need an ambient gas like air to work and has nothing to do with tractor beams in space (like TFA says)? And you just want to make a shitty pun, which will no doubt be followed up with another shitty pun about ambient gas?

      My cheerios, there is piss in them.

    2. Re:Strangely drawn to this story... by Abstrackt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If somebody makes a beam that can move something bigger than a bacterium around I'll be impressed whether it works in space or not.

      As for your cheerios, perhaps you should label your liquids better.

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    3. Re:Strangely drawn to this story... by Dishevel · · Score: 1

      That is a mighty shitty smelling ambient gas you are spewing there.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    4. Re:Strangely drawn to this story... by natehoy · · Score: 1

      shitty pun about ambient gas

      No point now, you've already made it.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    5. Re:Strangely drawn to this story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever see a can of compressed air move things? Same basic principle of pressure changes to move things.

    6. Re:Strangely drawn to this story... by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

      Ever see a can of compressed air move things? Same basic principle of pressure changes to move things.

      Fascinating, thanks for the explanation. You win this round, AC.

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    7. Re:Strangely drawn to this story... by countSudoku() · · Score: 1

      +1 attract force!

      These new tractor beams need to have more secure panels designed behind something a bit more daunting than a simple catwalk to the control lever that any old Jedi and get to, even when guarded by several weak-minded Storm Troopers.

      Let's learn from the Emperor's mistake here and improve that design for the future!

      --
      This is the NSA, we're gonna geet U h@x0r5! Also, what is a h@x0r5?
    8. Re:Strangely drawn to this story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't you watch Dr. Plait's lecture Don't be a Dick? Your sig helps nobody

    9. Re:Strangely drawn to this story... by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 1

      Your sig helps nobody

      Neither does appeasement.

    10. Re:Strangely drawn to this story... by itlurksbeneath · · Score: 1

      Did you read TFA? Previously: particles the size of a bacterium a few millimeters in a liquid. And now: new technique can move objects one hundred times that size over a distance of a meter or more

      Hell, that was even copy/pasted from the summary. You didn't even read TFS

      --
      Have you ever considered piracy? You'd make a wonderful Dread Pirate Roberts.
    11. Re:Strangely drawn to this story... by Dishevel · · Score: 3, Funny

      I did not realize that every aspect of my life needs to be devoted toward helping some other person out.

      Wow!
      This means a major change for me!
      The toilet paper I choose seems to help nothing.
      93.7% of my /. posts help no one.
      I watched the news last night. No one helped there.
      I failed to watch some lecture. No helping there.
      This post.

      You are so right. Have no more time for anything now that I have seen the light.

      Oh wait.
      I meant to say.
      Fuck off.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    12. Re:Strangely drawn to this story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's learn from the Emperor's mistake here and improve that design for the future!

      Before you get all regulationist on this, remember, it's not the tractor beam that pulls you in but the Imperial sub-officer working its controls.

  4. Assembling circuits? by Covalent · · Score: 1

    It seems like this tech would be useful for assembling circuits or computer chips.

    --
    Great warrior...hrmph! Wars not make one great.
    1. Re:Assembling circuits? by Ironhandx · · Score: 1

      Once its polished more and can move smaller objects, and do it quickly, then it probably would be a good thing for manufacturing.

      I'm not an engineer however, could someone with some experience in the field of chip manufacturing RTFA and weigh in?

    2. Re:Assembling circuits? by nschubach · · Score: 1

      Chip manufacturing is done via printing transistors rather than assembling them... I think GP was more concerned with the notion of making small components (resistors/capacitors/etc.), but I would think the smaller the component would mean lower power/less usefulness.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    3. Re:Assembling circuits? by Ironhandx · · Score: 1

      The way I was envisioning this was more along the lines of printing a la laser printer style, but I suppose it was a passing fancy and the tech won't be useful for that.

      I will settle for Star Trek style tractor beams however.

  5. NaNOtechnology ( +5, Informative ) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    should be renamed to "NO Technology" because
    the marketeers are abusing subatomic forces.

    Yours In Novosibirsk,
    K. Trout .

  6. Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    the tractor beam wont be installed until Tuesday.

  7. Sounds like this repulses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Tractor beams attract. A flashlight has more in common with a light saber, than this has with a tractor beam.

    Enough with the sensationalism, already. Leave that to the CNNs and Fox News's.. If you don't understand the science in an article, consider waiting for someone smarter than you to post it.

    News for mooncalves. Stuff thats way the fsck beyond your meager comprehension.

    1. Re:Sounds like this repulses by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Even if it did attract rather than repel, it works by means of heated air, so any resemblance to a "tractor beam" is in someone's very overactive imagination.

  8. Aren't tractor beams all about pulling? by Gotung · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sure moving objects with light is cool, but this is pushing, not pulling.

    This tech will do no good in keeping those pesky rebels from escaping your space station.

    1. Re:Aren't tractor beams all about pulling? by fabioalcor · · Score: 1

      Surely this tech needs more force.

    2. Re:Aren't tractor beams all about pulling? by nschubach · · Score: 1

      But you can use it to keep the rebels off your front lawn! ;)

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    3. Re:Aren't tractor beams all about pulling? by natehoy · · Score: 1

      My tractor has a reverse gear. Don't they all? :)

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    4. Re:Aren't tractor beams all about pulling? by mrzaph0d · · Score: 1

      wow. i just pictured one of these made into a pool cue stick.

      --
      this is just a placeholder till i send back my real sig from the future.
    5. Re:Aren't tractor beams all about pulling? by Idiomatick · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Uhhhh it works as a tractor beam just fine. FTFA:
      "The device works by shining a hollow laser beam around tiny glass particles. The air surrounding the particle heats up, while the dark center of the beam stays cool. When the particle starts to drift out of the middle and into the bright laser beam, the force of heated air molecules bouncing around and hitting the particle's surface is enough to nudge it back to the center."

      So if you take two or more lasers place them on opposite sides of where you want to pull something. Point the lasers at the object. Then slowly turn the beams towards the middle. Tada. You've pulled your object to you.

      In other news, I only use repulsive forces on with hand to pick up things (other forces too minor to consider), yet some how I still manage to pull things towards myself.

    6. Re:Aren't tractor beams all about pulling? by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      *with my hand

    7. Re:Aren't tractor beams all about pulling? by noidentity · · Score: 1

      Yeah, if they're about pushing, then I've got a tractor beam unit right here. As a bonus, it blows refreshing air.

    8. Re:Aren't tractor beams all about pulling? by JustOK · · Score: 2, Funny

      I made one once that would pull things. Everyone just said it sucked. Then that guy made a Dyson Vacuum Sphere and things got strange.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    9. Re:Aren't tractor beams all about pulling? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      From TFA it looks like it both pushes and pulls. Really cool tech; if I got the decimal place right it looks like it will move some pea sized objects (if I got it wrong a BB sized object). Only bad thing is it has to be really lightweight, like styrofoam or something. TFA is a good one, it well explains how it. Only think I can't understand is how you make a hollow laser beam?

      If the rebels are REALLY small they won't escape!

    10. Re:Aren't tractor beams all about pulling? by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Hey look!

      A radiometer

    11. Re:Aren't tractor beams all about pulling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No but if you installed one in your ventilation trench, you could push those pesky X-Wings back into the photon beams.

    12. Re:Aren't tractor beams all about pulling? by LiENUS · · Score: 1

      Mine has 2 reverse gears, goes forward if you engage both.

    13. Re:Aren't tractor beams all about pulling? by moonbender · · Score: 1

      Einstein Stool Box? WTF?

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    14. Re:Aren't tractor beams all about pulling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Star Trek, tractor beams can repulse as well as attract. So, what's your point?

    15. Re:Aren't tractor beams all about pulling? by syousef · · Score: 1

      Sure moving objects with light is cool, but this is pushing, not pulling.

      I beg to differ. This story summary is all about pulling. Pure masturbation.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    16. Re:Aren't tractor beams all about pulling? by ikeman32 · · Score: 1

      So what you are saying is that Robo Maid has been switch from suck to blow.

    17. Re:Aren't tractor beams all about pulling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only think I can't understand is how you make a hollow laser beam?

      Surely they mean it's cross-section is ring shaped rather than a solid circle. In which case they could just block the centre of the laser beam, although ideally they'd want to deflect the central portion out the the edge, I can't imagine it'd be that difficult to do.

  9. Tractor beams pull I thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As stated by the commenter in the article, don't tractor beams pull in most sci-fi stories? Pushing and pulling are two different things.

    1. Re:Tractor beams pull I thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just need to put the technobabble generator into reverse.

    2. Re:Tractor beams pull I thought by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Get your technobabble right, you need to reverse the polarity on the technobabble generator.

  10. Requires Air...lame by coolsnowmen · · Score: 1

    Nothing close to a tractor beam, as it requires using the properties of heating air to actually move things suspended in the air. A new age fan (http://www.dyson.com/fans/) will do just as good of a job.

    Don't get me wrong, there is nothing wrong with the research. It is simply not a tractor beam, or even the beginnings of one.

  11. This is great news for the farmers! by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

    What?!

    --
    http://www.acetonestudio.com
  12. From the Description... by Philomage · · Score: 3, Informative

    They should call this an optical pipette. (Yes, I did RTFA, and no, I'm not turning in my nerd card.)

    1. Re:From the Description... by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      Why not? Random molecules entering the beam would gain heat giving rise to a radial inward airflow (the same one that contains stuff now). Gentle suction and the contents would move. If I had the equipment, I would try it.

    2. Re:From the Description... by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      Or a Bactor Beam.

  13. Hope you can wait by T+Murphy · · Score: 5, Funny
    FTA:

    Physicists have been able to manipulate tiny particles over miniscule distances by using lasers for years.

    I hope the new tractor beams don't take as long to operate. I don't have that kind of time.

  14. Just what this country needs... by Last_Available_Usern · · Score: 1

    As if our country isn't obese enough already. Now we'll eventually have people getting beer and Doritos without even getting their fat asses off the couch.

    1. Re:Just what this country needs... by Coder4Life · · Score: 0, Funny

      As if our country isn't obese enough already. Now we'll eventually have people getting beer and Doritos without even getting their fat asses off the couch.

      Who needs a tractor beam when you have a wife to do this?

      --
      Once upon a time in a mythical land called Soviet Russia, a hot bowl of grits had Natalie Portman.
    2. Re:Just what this country needs... by Schemat1c · · Score: 1

      Who needs a tractor beam when you have a wife to do this?

      Wife? I think you forget where you are.

      --

      "Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everybody agrees that it is old enough to know better." - Unknown
    3. Re:Just what this country needs... by mcgrew · · Score: 1
  15. "Works by heating the air" by dimethylxanthine · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't work in space then I guess. Good luck Deathstart/ID4 motherships - Millenium Falcon and are off for a spin... see ya!
    - "Han, V2.0 is out."
    - "Shit, Marching into the detention area is not what I had in mind"...

    1. Re:"Works by heating the air" by Nrrqshrr · · Score: 0

      Well isn't it normally much easier in space? Though there is still this big difference between pulling and pushing.

  16. Not Really a Tractor Beam... by Richard.Tao · · Score: 4, Informative

    From the article "Because this technique needs heated gas to push the particles around, it can't work in the vacuum of outer space like the tractor beams in Star Trek."
    Also it needs lasers on both sides of the object and "tiny glass particles" near the object.This technique can in no way mimic the properties of what I consider a tractor bream: a beam of energy that pulls and object toward it. It's just a better way at moving stuff with light, which is still nifty.

    1. Re:Not Really a Tractor Beam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the article "Because this technique needs heated gas to push the particles around, it can't work in the vacuum of outer space like the tractor beams in Star Trek."

      Also it needs lasers on both sides of the object and "tiny glass particles" near the object.This technique can in no way mimic the properties of what I consider a tractor bream: a beam of energy that pulls and object toward it. It's just a better way at moving stuff with light, which is still nifty.

      Tractor beams in ST:TNG can push as well as pull :3

    2. Re:Not Really a Tractor Beam... by yabos · · Score: 1

      Yeah, just remember to engage it quick enough. Otherwise a ship might crash into your warp nacelle sending you into an infinite time loop.

    3. Re:Not Really a Tractor Beam... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      It's the first step. Maybe someone will create a solution similar to X-Ray back scatter.

      In every Sci-Fi show I've seen use one, I can't think of any that just had 1 beam, as oppose to to or more.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:Not Really a Tractor Beam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you're wrong on all counts. It is plausible this could be a first step toward a tractor beam. All you'd need to do is to is fill the hollow area of the beam with some kind of particle, and use it to set up negative pressure.

  17. Just reverse it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just reverse it -- use dark instead of light -- and it will pull.

    1. Re:Just reverse it by FalcDot · · Score: 1

      Nonono, all you reall need is to create a black hole in the right spot so you can use its gravity to bend your light beam in such a way that it hits the object you'll be 'pulling' from behind and hey presto, you're pushing!

    2. Re:Just reverse it by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      Just remember to never ever cross the streams.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  18. Tractor beans by daem0n1x · · Score: 1

    So, they're using tractors to harvest beans. So what?

  19. Profit! by PmanAce · · Score: 1

    Step 1: Point tractor beam to your wee-wee (only if you have erectile dificulties and don't feel like taking viagra anymore)
    Step 2: Turn on tractor beam
    Step 3: ???
    Step 4: Profit!

    --
    Tired of my customary (Score:1)
    1. Re:Profit! by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      in all seriousness, a device could cure cancer or something of similar importance to humanity, but people will first think of sexual applications. :)

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    2. Re:Profit! by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      3. Turn tractor beam off/on several times per second for several minutes, while exclaiming "Look, no hands!"
      4. Money shot!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  20. FAIL: doesn't work in space! by macraig · · Score: 1

    The AIR surrounding the particle heats up, while....

    Meh. Can't use it to snag passing Klingon battlecruisers.

    1. Re:FAIL: doesn't work in space! by natehoy · · Score: 1

      By the time the various science fiction series comes around, they'll figure out how to make the beam work in space. If they've solved the whole "sound carrying through a vacuum" thing, and designed inertial dampers and artificial gravity that perfectly compensate for turns so as to cause you to lean over as if you were driving a car fast around a tight turn, tractor beams should be simple.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    2. Re:FAIL: doesn't work in space! by tmosley · · Score: 1

      Sure you can, you just have to have it mounted next to a compressed air cylinder.

    3. Re:FAIL: doesn't work in space! by macraig · · Score: 1

      So... you're saying replace one warp nacelle with a giant balloon-filler?

  21. Until by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

    Until someone finds a way of using this for porn, its developement will be slow. Star Trek devices may sound cool, but the Internet didn't explode until someone found a way to distribute naughty pictures with it.

    --
    Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
  22. Tractor Beam? by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

    You mean like this?

    1. Re:Tractor Beam? by tenco · · Score: 1

      More like this.

  23. theres a more pressing need for research by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should be researching finding a replacement for fossil fuels

    1. Re:theres a more pressing need for research by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

      Come on. If they can't even be honest about not having a tractor beam, how are they going to resist lying about oil?

  24. AGAIN?!..... by IHC+Navistar · · Score: 1

    *ANOTHER* horribly erroneous SlashDot article title.....

    --
    Knowing Google's lust for data collection, the Soviet Union is still alive and well inside the psyche of Sergey Brin....
  25. Flinging items by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The laser cone is used to stabalize the item. Suppose the laser cone is mounted on a turret and shifts angles, effectively moving the item not just toward or away, but from left/right or up/down. If they start accelerating slowly, and then suddenly stop moving the turret, users could 'fling' material with these laser beams. If they stopped suddenly, I'd imagine that the laser cone couldn't contain the velocity of the item, and it would fling in the direction that it was heading.

  26. DIY laser hobbyists already experimenting by 0x537461746943 · · Score: 1

    DIY laser enthusiasts are already doing this with very light smoke particles. This is using 100mw home built hobbyist lasers from used CD drives, etc.

    http://laserpointerforums.com/f50/optical-trapping-real-laser-tractor-beams-45954.html

  27. Doesn't work in space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the article:
    "Because this technique needs heated gas to push the particles around, it can't work in the vacuum of outer space like the tractor beams in Star Trek. "

  28. Holographic uses? by dastardlydavros · · Score: 1

    I wonder if they could use this to produce mid air holograms? If they can suspend a single particle and have it glowing like that, then on a larger scale with multiple glowing particles you could build a 3D image without the need of a diffraction medium or vapour as with current mid air displays. Depending on the speed the particles can be manipulated, they could maybe even act as scan line dots.

  29. actually space is much easier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    all you need to do is fire a high intensity broadband stream of electrons at something and it will gradually move as there's no friction in space and also obviously no gravity

    1. Re:actually space is much easier by macraig · · Score: 1

      ... and it will gradually move....

      And the Klingons will hold still for that? I don't think so!

  30. Too late by CarpetShark · · Score: 2, Informative

    Listen, no one's left to care about bacteria. By the time the tractor beam has come to life, even the captain has already abandoned ship.

    I mean, seriously... even in the wildest sci-fi show, did you EVER hear of a tractor beam COMING TO LIFE?!

  31. I once... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I once had a tractor and on foggy nights I would turn on the lights on the tractor. They would shine through the fog and create a beam of light. Prior Art can't patent!

  32. That would be a PRESSOR beam by Medievalist · · Score: 1

    tractor beams attract things... pressor beams push on things...

    Well known in science fiction literature since the early 1930s or so, I think.

    I guess if you are a Tom Swift Jr. fan you'd want to call it a repellatron. As featured in "Tom Swift Jr. and his Repellatron Skyway" for example.

    1. Re:That would be a PRESSOR beam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? Then why did Kirk tell the helmsman to "put a tractor beam on it and set it to REPEL!" in one of the original episodes?

    2. Re:That would be a PRESSOR beam by geekoid · · Score: 1

      no it wouldn't.

      Look, I can tell you right now where this will go.
      No matter how much logic you use, it will be called tractor beams because that's what in the public consciousness

      So help yourself now, and tart thinking of it as a negative tractor beam.
      When this develops it will have a scale. +side for pulling things in, negative for pushing and a 0 for holding something 'still'.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  33. Good, how long till it can replace tractors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heh.
    "Tiny bacterium" is a long way from the heavy couch that we want to effortlessly put in our moving truck.
    How many orders of magnitude in size, volume and weight are we talking about? To be useful, it has to go from pico-grams or whatever bacteria weigh, to actual dozens of pounds.

    So, now that the hard part (discovery) is out of the way, this tech better advance at moore's law pace, or it will take hundreds of years to move book-sized things. Worse yet, it may turn into near-vaporware, like our other pet projects: airborne energy harnessing, commercial quantum cryptography and any form of non-microscopic quantum teleportation.

  34. Re:NaNOtechnology ( +5, Informative ) by jgtg32a · · Score: 1

    Did you just post Anon and mod yourself up?

  35. Optical tweezers can pull by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you use a high numerical aperture beam, by changing the focal position, you can move a bead in three dimensions, including towards the laser itself. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_tweezers

  36. You can move the heart by re_organeyes · · Score: 0

    But can you move the soul?

    1. Re:You can move the heart by geekoid · · Score: 1

      This is real, not magic.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  37. I look forward to the day by geekoid · · Score: 1

    when I can shoot things with lasers while plowing my field~
    \

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  38. Pressor beam anyhow. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2, Informative

    For some reason I thought of farm implements when I saw "tractor." Didn't make a whole lot of sense.

    Sure it does. "Tractor beams" and "tractors" are named that because they pull. (Same root as "traction".)

    However the beam in TFA is, in the science fiction vernacular, a "pressor beam", the "tractor beam"'s other-direction counterpart, because it pushes. The hollow cylindrical beam pushes inward, while the beam-down-the-middle pushes along the "tube".

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  39. OK, let's develop the list... by WheelDweller · · Score: 0

    Tractor beams.
    Light Sabers.
    Ray guns (not laser guns, but when are they getting upgraded?)
    Flying cars (not these toys)
    Supersonic (super-hydronic?) submarines.
    $10 laptops.
    Cheep mylar high-def, color screens that roll up like scrolls.
    Fuel Cells.
    Power for internal silicon from the blood stream.

    How many times do we have to SEE such things advertised "now available" that never come to fruition?

    I mean really. I've been seeing "cheap, rollup displays" announced about every year since 1996. When do they actually GET here, or should we just stop listening?

    --
    --- For a good time mail uce@ftc.gov
    1. Re:OK, let's develop the list... by vortexau · · Score: 1

      Tractor beams, but the implement is being dragged though the dirt and is in a sullen mood.

      --
      (David Bowman, EVA near HUGE Monolithic Win-PC in orbit around Jupiter) "My God - its full of Malware!"
  40. It seems that it uses air by doobydoobydoo · · Score: 1

    It is the heated air near the laser beams that moves the particle around, so this would be no use as a tractor beam in space, alas.

  41. Bacterium, you say... by CeruleanDragon · · Score: 1

    Are they related to midiclorians? If so, I think I figured out why this really worked... it wasn't the tools the scientists were using, the bacterium were moving *themselves*! :-O

    --
    ad astra per alia porci
  42. Tuesday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You left spacelab without a tweezer beam!? Let me guess, it will be installed on Tuesday?