Slashdot Mirror


Facing Oblivion, Island Nation Makes Big Sacrifice

Damien1972 writes "Kiribati, a small nation consisting of 33 Pacific island atolls, is forecast to be among the first countries swamped by rising sea levels. Nevertheless, the country recently made an astounding commitment: it closed over 150,000 square miles of its territory to fishing, an activity that accounts for nearly half the government's tax revenue. What moved the tiny country to take this monumental action? President Anote Tong, says Kiribati is sending a message to the world: 'We need to make sacrifices to provide a future for our children and grandchildren.'"

11 of 360 comments (clear)

  1. Accordians:hunting::the french:war by biryokumaru · · Score: 0, Troll

    How does this protect their children and grandchildren?

    --
    When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
    1. Re:Accordians:hunting::the french:war by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: -1, Troll

      This little man was bought off by the IMF. He will end the traditional self-sufficiency of his little land, selling it for dependency on the REAL rising tide: unrepayable debt. Debt that is tied to conditions that ensure the natives will never be able to manage on their own livelihoods again.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
  2. Of course by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 0, Troll

    What do you expect from a bunch of island savages?

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
  3. please rate this as a troll comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Is this slashdot or digg? From the articles I can't tell anymore. I used to like the news when it wasn't slanted towards any particular angle, but there are no good news sources anymore.

  4. Sounds like simple government oppression by Kohath · · Score: -1, Troll

    A government restricts the lives of ordinary, innocent citizens, making them poorer in the process, while the government officials continue on without changing their lifestyles at all. Or the government officials make a profit from the change by getting payments (or something else of value) from environmental special interest groups or from the fishermen who use the other, non-restricted territory and have fewer competitors selling fish.

    Governments using unnecessary force against people is oppression, even when the rulers are The Good People and they are doing it for The Good Reasons.

    Someone who cared about islanders would suggest they actually solve their problems (in the event those problems actually happen) by building some small seawalls or other simple structures to deal with a modest rise in sea levels. Whining and making ridiculous and destructive spectacles is useless and childish.

    1. Re:Sounds like simple government oppression by dissy · · Score: 0, Troll

      Troll much?

      A government restricts the lives of ordinary, innocent citizens, making them poorer in the process, while the government officials continue on without changing their lifestyles at all.

      But they have changed their lifestyle.

      Or the government officials make a profit from the change by getting payments (or something else of value) from environmental special interest groups or from the fishermen who use the other, non-restricted territory and have fewer competitors selling fish.

      Or? What OR? Are you implying future tense of something you think hasn't happened already?

      Governments using unnecessary force against people is oppression, even when the rulers are The Good People and they are doing it for The Good Reasons.

      So?
      I for one am thankful my government 'oppresses' you from being a murderer.
      Is that seriously the argument you are making? Anarchy?

      Someone who cared about islanders would suggest they actually solve their problems (in the event those problems actually happen) by building some small seawalls or other simple structures to deal with a modest rise in sea levels. Whining and making ridiculous and destructive spectacles is useless and childish.

      And how would that solve the problem at hand?
      That would do nothing but keep them above water for a tiny bit longer. 100% off topic.

      Try reading the article and get back to us when you have a thought on it. (Or not)

  5. Re:Never thought I'd hear that name again... by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 0, Troll

    Republicans - gotta love 'em.

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
  6. Re:They're gonna feel like... by gandhi_2 · · Score: -1, Troll

    Maybe if we by carbon credits from Al Gore's carbon trading firm, those islands will come back with unicorns and triple-rainbows.

    Aside from the media, liberal politicians, and moonbats.... not everyone agrees on the AGW hypothesis.
    Raise all the "awareness" you want, the sun's not listening.
    http://stagevu.com/video/nhljdfsznpkc

  7. Re:the bigger picture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    @tverbeek I agree with @linus on this one. these #mudpeople need to die off and make room for the rest of us.

  8. Re:They're gonna feel like... by GiveBenADollar · · Score: -1, Troll

    References. Please if you are going to make a blanket statement about sea levels rising then back it up. Otherwise I will take your statement with the same indifference I give to the anonymous coward. If it weren't for media blowing these pieces of research out of proportion I would be more receptive to believing facts as offered. As it is now, we have run out of oil several hundred times since the 70s, have overpopulated the earth to the point where we should all be dead by an order of magnitude from the 60s, we're living in a new ice age from global cooling, and we don't even have any birds left nor a viable ecosystem because of DDT from 1962. So let me say this in no uncertain terms: Either back up your claims with data beyond refute, or don't make end of the world predictions and expect me to jump.

  9. Re: by Kagura · · Score: 0, Troll

    >>>Like what? I'm not a fuel engineer so i'm not sure on the specifics, but there are methods for deriving hydrocarbon equivalents or good enough substitutes from organisms that are only recently dead, biofuels you know, I also have a distinct memory of hearing about some technique to turn CO2 into fuel, that of course is probably something we'll only bother with when the coal run out in a few hundred years.

    Well, I stopped reading after this paragraph I quoted. You don't have to be a "fuel engineer" to understand you don't have a clue of what you're talking about. Please go learn some basic, non-high-level, layman's chemistry.