Slashdot Mirror


GOG.com Not Really Gone

gspr writes "On Sunday, Slashdot and many others reported that DRM-free games site GOG.com was shutting down. Now the site is back, revealing that it was all a hoax. According to the site: 'Now it's time we put an end to all the speculations once and for all. It's true that we decided that we couldn't keep GOG.com the way it was so we won't. As you probably know by now, GOG.com is entering its new era with an end of the two-years beta stage and we're launching a brand new GOG.com with new, huge releases.' So it was all an advertising stunt."

21 of 276 comments (clear)

  1. The important part by Abstrackt · · Score: 4, Informative

    They still won't have DRM and they still won't have a download client.

    Love it or hate it, this is one of the more successful marketing stunts of late.

    --
    They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    1. Re:The important part by MrNiceguy_KS · · Score: 5, Funny

      I have the original box for Discworld II - Missing, Presumed...? but the discs are, sadly, long gone.

      I can't be the only one who noticed the irony.

      --
      Redundancy is good And also good.
    2. Re:The important part by doti · · Score: 3, Insightful

      they did not lie.

      they just said they couldn't keep the site the way it was.

      it was the news (including /.) that said that they were closing.

      --
      factor 966971: 966971
    3. Re:The important part by GravityStar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, a download client that supports resume, hash checking and block based re-download of corrupted blocks _would_ be nice though. Especially because we are likely talking about multi-gig downloads.

      It could still use plain http, and allow people to download the games using the web-browser. The extra download client would just add a bit of robustness.

    4. Re:The important part by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      They've been running for two years and this was the first you'd heard of them, in spite of the fact that they are mentioned in pretty much every Slashdot story that mentions DRM or Steam. What have they lost? Someone who had never heard of them has not heard of them. Of course, you say you're not going to buy anything from them, but at least you've heard of them so you might change your mind. Before, you definitely weren't going to buy anything from them, because you weren't even aware of their existence. Oh, and from their site, the first paragraph reads:

      First of all we would like to apologize everyone who felt deceived or harmed in any way by us closing down GOG.com without any warning and without giving access to your games. We apologize for that from the bottom of our hearts!

      Sounds like they realise that they upset some people. When was the last time you got an apology like that from a company that made a mistake that didn't actually harm anyone?

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    5. Re:The important part by teh+moges · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I had never heard of the site until this hoax. Now I at least know about it. I would say it would be a positive outcome (more people coming than going).

  2. Unintended consequences by lgftsa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The stunt worked, they got two front page /. articles about them. Of course, the downside is that they're now on my blacklist.

    1. Re:Unintended consequences by h4rr4r · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Really? What boxed games say on the outside "warning includes securerom and may screw your machine"?

  3. Let's be honest here by Pojut · · Score: 3, Insightful

    GOG has been gaining popularity and consumer visibility, ESPECIALLY in the past few months. Unless they were hit with a huge lawsuit or financial disaster, there would be no reason for them to close permanently.

    Sincerely,

    A not surprised (yet very relieved!) gamer

  4. DRM demonstration by MDHowle · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It was all a demonstration of what inevitable happens to DRM media.

  5. Unprofessional by joshuaf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I only have 2 games from them, but this kind of weird drama does make me less likely to purchase anymore in the future. It just seemed super unprofessional compared to steam and impulse.

    1. Re:Unprofessional by hedwards · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Perhaps it's because I used to be in security, but that was probably the most transparent act of deceit I can recall. The page they put up implied very, very strongly that they'd be back to something analogous if not the same in short order.

    2. Re:Unprofessional by joshuaf · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Except I hadn't actually downloaded them yet. I mostly bought them as a show of support for a DRM free company that was bringing back old games. It was MOO 1 and 2. I just liked knowing I had them out there when I wanted them. I've also since bought the same games on steam, when they later came there. Guess where I can download them from RIGHT NOW if I wanted. This is what makes me less likely to buy from them in the future.

    3. Re:Unprofessional by hedwards · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As opposed to the companies that DRM the hell out of their products, refuse to give refunds if the aforementioned DRM prevents you from using it and fails to disclose the degree to which the DRM impacts the security of your computer?

      Perhaps I'm missing something, but is this PR stunt really worse behavior than the competition or are you talking about not buying games from anybody?

  6. Re:Lovely. by KillaGouge · · Score: 3, Informative

    As long as you kept the files you downloaded, you can ways play the games. I think you might need to take a little time and think next time. Unlike Steam's DRM model GOG has no DRM and doesn't have to every phone home to a server.

    Why are you so angry?

    --
    GENERATION 25: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social exper
  7. As a loyal customer by thetagger · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... this stunt was horrible and silly and an annoyance. I recently reinstalled my computer, and when I went to Gog.com to redownload Gabriel Knight I got that stupid "zomg we're closing down" message. It feels like something straight out the 1990s, when nobody expected any degree of seriousness from Internet companies - thanks for reminding us how WE SHOUDLN'T TRUST YOU in the future, that's great marketing.

  8. Re:Lovely. by hedwards · · Score: 3, Informative

    The big issue there was that some people had just purchased and as a result hadn't had the chance to download and secondly, they'd promised the customers that they'd always be able to download the games. I'm not sure anybody really believed always, but I do think that most of us assumed that when or if they shut down that there'd be arrangements in place or some sort of warning to download your stuff.

    I mean even 3d Realms when they went out of business made arrangements to handle recent orders.

  9. It sort of serves the GOG community right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    For 2 months the GOG forums have been rife with posts about how their birthday event better live up to expectations, or else (else is always ominously undefined). I think many customers were getting a little annoying. Living 2-3 days thinking GOG might be gone probably grounded a lot of these folks and imo it serves them right. I've purchased a ton of stuff from GOG and will continue to do so, since they're still offering the product that I want.

    I was depressed when I saw the notice not because I wouldn't be able to redownload some games I'd lost in a hard drive crash but more because there's no other company like them. GOG folding would be essentially saying, "Okay, Steam wins." Steam sucks in my mind, if that's online game sales, count me out. I already feel marginalized for enjoying PC games (even if I do have a 360), I'd be left with only indie titles sans DRM on my PC. I like my indie titles but I also like some of the big releases and the classics.

    I think there might have been a couple of behind the scenes reasons for doing this and all in all, it will benefit GOG in the longrun. It probably cost them some goodwill in the short term, but if the cost is low enough that's not de defacto a show stopper.

  10. The funniest part... by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...is the negative reactions now.

    "Huff! Puff! Well, *I* won't be buying form them again after *this* treatment! Harumph!" Seriously, people, do you have any idea how you sound? Like a curmudgeonly old fool. Oh, you are SO offended! And you know *someone* out there is thinking of suing because their fragile little selves were damaged.

    My reaction was "Oh, shoot, I was going to go and get Syberia next week." and then "Oh, cool, I can still get Syberia." Any reaction more serious that that is a complete failure of your perspective matrix.

    As for Syberia, hey, I played the updated Monkey Island and now have an urge to go play some of the point and click puzzlers I missed. Weclome back, GOG. :-)

  11. Re:Still won't use it by shovas · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They do more than that. They verify the games work without problems, using dosbox, under XP/Vista/7. They code and do actual porting on other titles because they have more than just dos games. They remove DRM where it exists. And they've gotten some great exclusives. They're honest (obvious by their amateurish behaviour), they have integrity, they're open and willing to communicate. Give them another shot. Their claim about porting applies to the X% of games they sell that can't run under DosBox and even some that too to fix bugs.

    --
    Selah.ca. Pause, and calmly think on that.
  12. Re:I never used GOG before... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    and I certainly won't start now. I'll stick with Steam, Valve doesn't have to stoop to such underhanded practices to gain popularity or even commercial viability. Never mind the fact that Steam will be around long after GOG is nothing but a footnote in gamer history.

    This has got to be the most ignorant thing I've read in this thread. You do realize I'll be playing my games from GOG long after they're a "footnote in gamer history" whereas your Steam games will quit working soon after Valve goes tits-up, don't you? Playing offline will only work for so long before the Steam client demands a connection and there won't be any universal unlock forthcoming (I don't know why this myth even persists, it's ignorant in the extreme), they won't own their own assets when it happens and not a single person who could do it, supposing it's even possible, will be willing to go to prison to come through for you. GOG already came through for me, the games can be downloaded, backed up, and installed at will and only the downloading part even requires an internet connection.

    Of course Valve/Steam doesn't even have to go down and out, you can lose your account and all your games on their whim. They've been nice so far but that doesn't mean it'll last forever. They're have certainly been wrongfully banned accounts in the past and the only "oops, our bad" I've heard from them involved 1000s of accounts. What happens when 5 accounts get wrongfully banned? They won't investigate and no one will care.

    Enjoy Steam if you want, it may be a gilded cage but it's still a cage.