Slashdot Mirror


Countering a DMCA Takedown In the Magnet Wars

An anonymous reader writes "Zen Magnets, a maker of neodymium magnet toys, has been under assault by the much larger and better distributed Buckyballs, maker of a nearly identical toy. After Zen Magnets listed a couple of eBay auctions with a set of Buckyballs and a set of their own, asking customers to decide which was of higher quality, Buckyballs replied with a legal threat. Zen Magnets countered with an open video response, in which they presented the voicemail from Buckyballs and demonstrated their claims of quality through repeatable, factual tests, providing quantitative data to back up their assertions. Soon after, Buckyballs CEO Jake Bronstein got the video taken down from YouTube via a DMCA takedown, despite the fact that the only elements not made by Zen Magnets are the voicemail he left and some images of himself, which are low-resolution and publicly available online. Zen Magnets has decided to file a counter-takedown notice — not effective yet apparently, since the video is still marked as taken down." Slashdot's sister company ThinkGeek sells Buckyballs. No, we don't get kickbacks, but we totally should.
Update: 09/23 13:23 GMT by KD : Reader Coopjust (872796) points out one place where the disputed video has been mirrored.

79 of 475 comments (clear)

  1. bullcrap by Pojut · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think this is an abuse of the DMCA (some would argue that any use of it is abuse, but that's a different topic.) If they can back up their assertions with data and repeatable demonstrations, quit yer bitchin' and make a better product.

    1. Re:bullcrap by Pojut · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I have learned to include "I think" or "in my opinion" on Slashdot, regardless of what the topic is. I'd rather respond to posts like yours instead of "stop acting like your opinion is fact."

    2. Re:bullcrap by hedwards · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Clearly you're not American and haven't been to America in a really long time. This is the way that corporations work. They could make a better product, but it's usually cheaper to abuse the court system or buy out the competition.

    3. Re:bullcrap by erroneus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Does the DMCA offer any immunity to civil lawsuits for damages resulting from a [false/abusive] DMCA takedown notice? If not, then the answer here would seem to be simple. I think the plaintiff can prove through a preponderance of evidence that the issuer of the notice knew it had no claim of copyright over any of the material in the video. This would prove the DMCA takedown notice was wilfully abused for the purpose of censorship damaging the plaintiff's business.

      They should definitely sue.

    4. Re:bullcrap by Sonny+Yatsen · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, unless what you're posting is, in fact, fact, I think.

      --
      My postings are informational and does not constitute legal advice. Act on it at your risk.
    5. Re:bullcrap by dziban303 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Pretty much anything sold by Thinkgeek these days is poor quality. Buckyballs are apparently no different.

      Note: The above statement is presented as fact, not opinion.

      Let's see how long it takes for my comment to be removed.

    6. Re:bullcrap by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The worst problem is in areas like Appliances where the company making cheap crap ("Whirlxxxx") buys out their higher quality competition ("Mayxxx"), and then starts producing cheap crap under the "Mayxxx" name.

      It has reached a point where it is impossible (as far as I can tell) to buy
      a dishwasher
      a hot water heater
      a washing machine

      That will last 20 years like they used to. The current dishwashers have electronics that are damaged by storms every 2-3 years. Some of the "money" parts are hard plastic so they wear out well before 10 years.

      It's better in some cases to buy used and spend big bucks getting the item repaired. Then at least you have a solid appliance.

      Please feel free to post if you've found a source for reliable (as in 20 year life span) major appliances.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    7. Re:bullcrap by NJRoadfan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Mayxxx was making crap well before Whirlxxxx bought them out. This is based on first hand experience. People want cheap cheap cheap, so the design choices you mentioned were made to reach a price point.

    8. Re:bullcrap by RattFink · · Score: 3, Informative

      The penalty is right in the notice. All proper DCMA take down request require this:

      I swear, under penalty of perjury, that the information in the notification is accurate and that I am the copyright owner or am authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed.

      A false or abusive notice can land the petitioner on the hook for perjury. The problem is getting it prosecuted and making the charges stick.

      --
      "I don't necessarily agree with everything I say." - Marshall McLuhan
    9. Re:bullcrap by Teancum · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It is an interesting concept. The trick here would be to prove damages, although it is possible to file a libel tort if the assertion of copyright infringement was knowingly false. Because there was technically copyrighted material involved that was owned by Buckyballs, I don't think this assertion would work in court. Yes, the content is being reproduced under clear fair-use standards, which is precisely why the counter notice was issued. That process is spelled out very clearly in the DMCA and to me is one of the few good things in that legislation (surrounded by a whole bunch of evil text).

      Basically an ISP must respond to a take-down notice, but if a protest if filed then the content must be restored and the matter goes to a court for resolution. Of course companies like YouTube may not be entirely friendly about the process and may lean a little more toward taking stuff down rather than restoring it. It may even take a lawsuit against the ISP to "educate" them about what the DMCA actually says. This can get tricky though, as restoring the content which is later proven to be infringing in court can bring penalties that may be increased due to the content being restored. It definitely is time to hire an attorney if this kind of chest thumping starts to happen and you care about whatever it is that is getting yanked around on the net.

    10. Re:bullcrap by Jawnn · · Score: 4, Informative

      "The Wal-Mart Effect" is the name for what you describe. See here and here for a wonderfully informative story on how it works.

    11. Re:bullcrap by commodore64_love · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In my opinion it's not "abuse" unless youtube refuses to restore the video.

      You see under DMCA law, youtube has no choice. If they receive a request they MUST take down the material. Youtube is not supposed to make judgment calls on the validity of the request. Step 2 is to submit the anti-takedown request which youtube must also obey and restore the material (or else fce a lawsuit). Step 3 is for the offended company to either take it to court.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    12. Re:bullcrap by Thansal · · Score: 3, Informative

      It isn't youtube people are calling abuse on, it's the company issuing the DMCA take down...

      --
      Do Or Do Not, There Is No Spoon, There Is Only Zuul. Everything in the above post is probably opinion.
    13. Re:bullcrap by Pojut · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is the approach we took when buying a new printer. We looked into getting invitations for our wedding done professionally, and after seeing how much it cost, we just picked up some decent looking invitations from Michael's and went out to buy a new printer (it ended up costing about 1/4th what it would have cost to get them done professionally...and we got a printer out of it!)

      We went with a Brother HL-2170W. $90 for a wireless laser printer, and it works AMAZINGLY well. Toner is super cheap (the extended carts can be found for $40, and last for ~2,200 pages under real world applications), the wireless was super simple to set up, it's quiet and fast...a great investment.

      We didn't care about bells and whistles, we didn't care about color, or a copier, or "PC-free printing"...we just wanted a wireless laser printer that did nothing but print. This thing is easily the best printer I've ever owned.

    14. Re:bullcrap by value_added · · Score: 4, Informative

      Please feel free to post if you've found a source for reliable (as in 20 year life span) major appliances.

      How's "Miele" for a start?

      Most anything they sell will give you a good 20 years of service, and if not, the construction and quality of materials is such that a rebuild (motor, etc.) is worth the money and trouble. I've heard Steve Jobs opted for Miele washing machines and dryers. Could have been an aesthetic choice, but folks buying a BMW or a Porsche may be doing the same.

      If a stove is what you want, then try something from a manufacturer like Wolf. There's no reason a good quality stove shouldn't last you 50 years or more.

      All in all, it depends on how much money you want to spend. And how willing you are to shop somewhere other than the local mall. We live in a Walmart world where convenience and price reign supreme for most people, so any meaningful discussion of quality is typically among the "select few". Put another way, I have to make a special trip to buy my vacuum cleaner bags. ;-)

    15. Re:bullcrap by commodore64_love · · Score: 2, Informative

      I know it's fun to make fun of Walmart but I admire their philosophy.

      "The vice president's office was furnished with a folding lawn chair and a chaise lounge." i.e. Cutting costs. Saving money. Perhaps if US citizens and more importantly the US Congress adopted the same "live within your means" philosophy, we would not have a national debt equal to $140,000 per household (plus another $90,000 of personal mortgage/credit card debt on top of that). Having ~230,000 average debt per home is not sustainable.

      Also I'm not sure why the Snapper CEO felt intimidated (saying he literally started sweating). I certainly would not. The Walmart VP is a man and nothing more.
      .

      >>>"(Wal-Mart won't help you out with repairing broken mowers)"

      Flat wrong. When my car broke down, Walmart towed me into their garage and found the problem (dead battery). While there I mentioned I had a broken weed eater and the mechanic said they repair lawn appliances too. If this Snapper story couldn't get that bit of the story correct, I suspect the rest is wrong (or embellished) as well.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    16. Re:bullcrap by grub · · Score: 4, Funny


      I was a vegetarian for about 10 years (ending over 15 ago) for no particular reason.

      But bacon... oh bacon... It would call to me in my dreams. Sizzling bacon strips with arms and legs and breasts moaning seductively "Eat me, grub!"

      Then the dream that ended it all. I was tied to a slab of salt pork while a giant bacon strip wearing a pig mask and sporting a large bacon penis assaulted me.

      So when friends today ask why I quit being a vegetarian I don't tell them about the anal and oral rape. I just shrug my shoulders sheepishly.

      MMmm... bacon.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    17. Re:bullcrap by PseudonymousBraveguy · · Score: 2, Informative

      How's "Miele" for a start?

      Second that. Miele is one of the last german appliances manufacturer who are still producing in Germany and were not bought out by some cheap Whirl***-alike company. Prepare to pay a little more than usual, though.

    18. Re:bullcrap by lowrydr310 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Let me tell you the story of my famous drill. When I was a teenager, my father and I were hiking in the woods and came across an old pile of garbage that someone had dumped. It looked like it had been sitting there for at least five years, and had obviously been through many seasons with plenty of rain and snow. We took it home with us and decided to clean it up. We disassembled it, gave it a brief cleaning, lubed it, and replaced the power cord because the existing cord was frayed and the insulation was dryrotted. We plugged it in and to our surprise it worked! It's from the early 50s, and is a perfect example of quality craftsmanship, when things were designed to last decades.

    19. Re:bullcrap by saider · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The problem with the Wal-Mart philosophy is that up-front cost becomes the only measure of "value". Things like longevity and quality are not considered.

      --


      Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
    20. Re:bullcrap by kilfarsnar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      People want cheap cheap cheap, so the design choices you mentioned were made to reach a price point.

      Indeed they do. I have had multi-millionaires rave to me about how cheap Wallmart is. I don't fully get it. I understand wanting to pay less for something. But at some point that low price comes at the cost of quality or features. That seems like a bad trade to me, but many people don't seem to consider it. Maybe they think that if their widget breaks, it's ok because it's cheap to replace. That still seems short-sighted to me.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    21. Re:bullcrap by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I buy Land's End Business Outfitters clothing. After 2 years i lost some socks to laundry room theft, so bought some new ones. The new socks are ... a shade whiter than the old ones. The 2 year old ones that I do still have are otherwise indistinguishable. They also cost $20 for 3 pair ($6.66/pair)

      I used to buy Wal-Mart clothing. Socks come $8 for 8 pair I think ($1/pair). The socks are not as nice to begin with. After about a month (maybe 4 washes), they have little lint balls hanging off and are flattened out like paper, and fraying. In less than a year they have holes. Realistically I could justify replacing them each month or at most 2 months, so maybe $8 x 6 = $48/year versus $40 for 6 pair that last me ... probably 3, 4 years? I haven't actually found out yet. And those expensive socks are a hell of a lot nicer. We're talking nicer things for $10-$15/year.

      It's the same with the shirts. I bought undershirts that are nice and fluffy... over two years ago, $20 for a 3 pack. They're good as new, but a little yellowed due to my horrible water (they're UNDER my shirt and feel nice), no fraying at all. I have shirts I bought 2 years ago from Land's End; one frayed around the edges, the other 5 are almost brand new. The pants... one has frayed because I kick my shoes off and catch the cuff under my sole; the others I haven't damaged and they need to be ironed. The shirts cost me $25 (wal-mart shirts are $15-$18) and pants cost me $30 (Wal-Mart pants cost me $18-$25, list price on Land's End pants is $40 but Sears has sales).

      The stuff I get from Wal-Mart lasts me about 2-3 months before showing holes, frayed/lost threads (bands around pants legs where thread has unraveled!), or complete loss of volume (socks, undershirts become paper-like). I pay 1.5 times as much and get something that lasts 2-3 years at least without fading or fraying, and it looks and feels better because it's dyed with better dyes and woven better (some of my cotton shirts have a smooth sheen and feel like silk!) and made of brushed Peruvian cotton. I'm sorry but yes, more expensive stuff just costs less; these people are indeed short-sighted morons.

    22. Re:bullcrap by HungryHobo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That will last 20 years like they used to

      There's a selection bias here.
      There is cheap crap now which breaks right away.
      There has always been cheap crap that breaks right away.

      But you remember the lightbulb which lasted 10 years, not the other 20 that came with it and all burned out in the first few years.
      You remember the phone which lasted 10 years, not the one which you had to take back after a week with a flaky screen.

      People assume that they built things better in the old days because the items from that era have lasted so well.
      Ignoring that the items that didn't last aren't here to be evaluated.

      In 20 years there will still be people talking about the washing machine they bought back in 2010 which lasted 20 years and why can't they build like that nowdays.

      though I'll agree with you that whirlpool as a brand is terrible.

    23. Re:bullcrap by dcavanaugh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We have few options to buy long-lasting products because nobody wants to pay a premium for higher quality. There is a good reason for this. Factory production is a process that can be automated from end to end with most of the labor coming from low-cost offshore workers.

      Repair is a different matter. It takes more labor to fix an appliance than it does to make one. The repair tech has a higher skill level than most of the factory workers, and this labor cannot be sent offshore. The cost of parts is much higher as well. Somebody has to operate a warehouse full of replacement parts for machines made over many years. Some of those parts will sit on the shelf for years, some will never be sold. Therefore, the markup on parts has to subsidize the slow-selling and non-selling parts.

      If someone could make a durable appliance that NEVER had to be fixed, it would be worth the premium. But as soon as service is required, we all know that a service call is dangerously close to the cost of a cheapie replacement appliance. Consumers generally demand features (like computerized controls) that increase the chance of failure at some point -- regardless of how well-made the rest of the machine is.

      Kirby vacuum cleaners are awesome machines. But if you buy a plastic Hoover every 3 years, it will probably cost less (even if you buy 7 of them over 21 years). Your carpet will still be clean, and your risk at any given point is limited to the cost of a Walmart plastic vacuum cleaner. The Kirby will cost more to fix than the Hoover will cost to buy.

      Some people buy exotic cars with the full understanding that the annual cost of repairs will be dangerously close to the payments on a brand new Toyota. But if you love the car, you accept the tradeoff. This happens far less often with appliances because it's hard to love a refrigerator all that much.

    24. Re:bullcrap by blackraven14250 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "The vice president's office was furnished with a folding lawn chair and a chaise lounge." i.e. Cutting costs. Saving money.

      Yet the owners with the highest number of shares, the Waltons (all 4 of them), each walk away with billions per year, while the people working there live just below the poverty line.

    25. Re:bullcrap by saider · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I have a VCR that still works (it was bought in 1993 when I was in college). I also still have my original Sony CD player bought in 1988 (not the size of a small TV) and it is still plays CDs from time to time. My Panasonic receiver and amp I bought in 1995 are still driving my 30 year old speakers. My appliances (washer, dryer, fridge, dishwasher) are all older than my 10 year old son, with only minor repairs here and there.

      Granted, I don't use the CD player much because I have my computer hooked up to the stereo now. But why should I have to repurchase something just because some marketing droid figured that everyone will want to toss ProductX in 3 years. Most components of playing music (amp, speakers, etc) haven't changed much. Mowing the lawn and doing laundry have not changed much in 30+ years. Why should I buy a cheap machine, when I can pay twice as much and get a machine that lasts much, much longer? Appliances never break on Saturday morning right before you were heading off to Home Depot. They go out on Sunday night on the week that you need to work overtime in order to get the Super-Important project done on time.

      I vote with my wallet for quality all the time. That is why I do not shop at Wal-mart. I have found that even the quality brands will have cheap-ass Walmart-only models that are far inferior to the other models that they sell. The problem is that people do not do their research and buy these inferior models and send the message to the retailers that "I like crap". This causes other retailers to do the same in order to compete. This makes the quality models much harder to find, and more importantly, the retailers never get the message because they are plenty busy selling crap to people who don't care.

      --


      Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
    26. Re:bullcrap by SpeZek · · Score: 4, Insightful

      their appliances tend to be bloody heavy

      I've found that judging a lot of different things by weight gives you a good indication of the quality of that product.

      Heavier furniture? They didn't use cheap wood. Heavy fridge? It's metal, not plastic. Heavy powersupply? It has quality caps and sinks. Heavy metal...

    27. Re:bullcrap by noidentity · · Score: 2, Funny

      It has reached a point where it is impossible (as far as I can tell) to buy

      [...]
      a hot water heater

      I just now found a very cheap device which accepts raw hot water and produces heated hot water.

    28. Re:bullcrap by mcgrew · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Often you're not paying for anything but a name; I could have spent $150 on a pair of Nike shoes, but I bought a pair at WalMart for $5 several years ago; they're only now to the point of needing replacement. I'd be willing to bet that if I'd bought Nike they'd be shot, too.

      I pick up Nike tshirts at garage sales for seventy five cents. It's stupid to pay extra for "quality" in an item you don't plan on keeping long, and IMO it's doubly stupid to pay extra for a name.

      Aleive costs three times what the same strength generic naproxin sodium costs, but the product is identical. The extra cost buys you nothing.

    29. Re:bullcrap by ultranova · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yet the owners with the highest number of shares, the Waltons (all 4 of them), each walk away with billions per year, while the people working there live just below the poverty line.

      Well, that is the whole point of Capitalism: it's Feudalism 2.0, with some of the dogma changed to a new wording - for example, rather than talking about the Divine Right of Kings, they talk about Property Rights, and rather than talking about God, they talk about the Invisible Hand of the Market. But it all works out to the same: the nobility benefits at the expense of everyone else.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    30. Re:bullcrap by DinDaddy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sears' appliances have always been rebranded units from the major mfrs, i.e. whirlpool, GE, etc., so their quality decline is due to the other brands.

      Their customer service went into a severe nosedive about 2-3 years ago. We had bought ~$10K in appliances from them during 1995-2005, and they always bent over backwards to give us good servic up until then.

      Then one day, after the third repeat of an issue with a Kenmore rebranded whirlpool high end washer, they stopped being helpful and actually became obstructive to getting it serviced. My wife pressed the agent on the phone, who finally admitted the company had reprioritized their whole service department to reduce costs and they were instructed to literally make it as diificult as possible to get warranty service. My wife asked if it mattered that we would now take our obviously lucrative (to them) appliance business somewhere else, and was told yes, it was short sighted, but couldn't be helped.

      Gotta please the shareholders.

    31. Re:bullcrap by The+Grim+Reefer2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sears' appliances have always been rebranded units from the major mfrs, i.e. whirlpool, GE, etc., so their quality decline is due to the other brands.

      Their customer service went into a severe nosedive about 2-3 years ago.

      That's about the time K-Mart bought them.

    32. Re:bullcrap by Sancho · · Score: 2, Funny

      Bravo! I applaud this. Too many individuals on Slashdot post comments with such conviction, yet they know nothing about the topic at hand. Too many uneducated rationalizations.

      Well, that's your opinion.

    33. Re:bullcrap by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The problem I have is inappropriate use of plastic.

      Using one metal gear instead of a plastic gear makes the difference between your blender being durable or being a piece of junk.

      My laptop plug broke- why? Plastic mountings. The fix? A free upgrade to a metal bracket inside.

      It's not that they replace some parts with plastic or cheap parts. It's that they replace key/high wear parts with cheap/plastic parts.

      ---

      Old story-- during world war II, they were losing bombers and so they analyzed the planes that made it back and noted the areas that were damaged and which were undamaged.

      Where did they increase the armor?

      In the areas which were not hit. Apparently hits on those areas took down the planes.
      the planes survived the areas which were getting hit a lot.

      ---
      It's okay to have a plastic container and housing on a blender. but for god's sake don't cheap out on the motor and the gears.

      And part of the problem is as you (and others) indicate, they take an expensive "name" brand and then hollow it out with lower and lower quality while still charging a premium price. So it's hard to find a reliable brand based on 3-5 year old information. it needs to be good 5 years ago and then have folks still thinking it's good today.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    34. Re:bullcrap by commodore64_love · · Score: 2

      >>>the Waltons (all 4 of them), each walk away with billions per year

      You've been marked insightful but it's flat wrong. The Waltons earn a lot of money, but its in the millions per year NOT billions. 1/1000th smaller than what you claimed. ----- And of course that fortune could change at any time. Look what happened to the former #1 retailer (Woolworths == bankrupt).

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
  2. The Question by Ltap · · Score: 4, Interesting

    News about an unfair DMCA takedown (don't worry, there are thousands of those) or free advertising for Zen Magnets? You decide.

    --
    Yet Another Tech Blog
    (but so much more, including game and movie reviews)
    http://yanteb.peasantoid.org
  3. Fair Use by Sonny+Yatsen · · Score: 4, Informative

    One of the specifically noted exception to American Trademark Fair Use is that you can use a competitor's name in an advertisement as a way of comparing your product with theirs. Since the whole point of trademarks is to inform customers about the source and quality of a product, the whole trademark infrastructure is geared toward benefiting the customer. So we want want companies to say "My brand X is better than brand Y!". Buckyballs, if Zen Magnets don't back down and this goes to court, have no case.

    --
    My postings are informational and does not constitute legal advice. Act on it at your risk.
    1. Re:Fair Use by Beorytis · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Another important class of fair uses is parody, and there's no way the photos of Jake Brownstein in the video were not intended as parody.

  4. Counter-takedown notice? by clone53421 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    YouTube is probably laughing right now... if anybody human actually saw it so soon.

    Not the way it should be, of course... a counter-takedown notice is basically legal notice that you, the uploader, take full legal responsibility for the content, and they must IMMEDIATELY restore it – and they face full legal responsibility of any losses you incur if they do not!

    (Personally I’d love to see the outcome of a lawsuit to try to recoup damages from YouTube after a counter-takedown notice was ignored. Granted they have other stuff in their TOS that pretty much makes them not liable for anything, but if they explicitly took something down because of the DMCA, shouldn’t they be liable under its terms?)

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    1. Re:Counter-takedown notice? by Coopjust · · Score: 2, Informative
      The reddit link seems to indicate that they're in the process of making sure they're completely clear:

      Decision is we're going to do a counter-notification, but we're gonna have a lawyer back us up. (Especially since there have been good points about potential $$$ damages for perjuring a false copyright take-down.)

      The video has been reuploaded to Youtube by a few others though.

  5. Other users have now mirrored it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's a mirror of the video.

    Zen's delay is most likely due to the fact that they're consulting a lawyer to make sure things are done by the book and they're legally in the clear (and don't damage any possibility of suing Buckyballs for committing perjury on the DMCA notice).

    This is what they've last said on the matter on reddit:

    Edit: Decision is we're going to do a counter-notification, but we're gonna have a lawyer back us up. (Especially since there have been good points about potential $$$ damages for perjuring a false copyright take-down.)

    1. Re:Other users have now mirrored it by Narcocide · · Score: 2, Informative

      video == hilarious :)

  6. Re:Fucking Magnets, by chichilalescu · · Score: 3, Interesting

    the most interesting thing is that they don't actually work, because the force they exert on something is always perpendicular to the direction of motion of that something.

    --
    new sig
  7. thinkgeek by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have been a customer of ThinkGeek for a long while... and I hope that they really show where their values are and DROP BuckyBalls as product. I've always believed that they took more notice of this type of stuff and tried to stock items that didn't participate in this type of corporate asshattery. I hope I don't get proved wrong...

    1. Re:thinkgeek by mandark1967 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Their values? Seriously?

      I purchased two golf-type shirts from them. Both are a bit oversized as I like loose-fitting shirts

      The first one ripped on its own under both arms due to the stitching not being properly done.

      The other? It unbuttons itself. While that may be a useful feature, if my name is Kandi and I'm dancing at "The Gold Club", it's not so useful if I am in a meeting at work.

      --
      Sig Follows: "Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself." -- Mark Twain
    2. Re:thinkgeek by Chysn · · Score: 2, Funny

      I have been a customer of ThinkGeek for a long while... and I hope that they really show where their values are and DROP BuckyBalls as product

      You are just so cute, I could eat your right up!

      --
      --I'm so big, my sig has its own sig.
      -- See?
    3. Re:ThinkGeek by martas · · Score: 3, Informative

      again, thinkgeek's general email address is webmonster@thinkgeek.com . make your opinion heard.

    4. Re:ThinkGeek by Jaysyn · · Score: 2, Informative

      I used the webform, but way ahead of you.

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    5. Re:thinkgeek by commodore64_love · · Score: 2, Informative

      >>>DROP BuckyBalls as product.

      Doubtful. Thinkgeek just filled their warehouse with millions of Buckyball products, in preparation for the Christmas season. They can't just drop Buckyball in an instant.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    6. Re:ThinkGeek by RealGrouchy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Plus, I heard of this other company that makes a product that's not only very similar, but also better!

      - RG>

      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
  8. news. by postermmxvicom · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is news. However, Buckyballs is certainly giving Zen Magnets lots of free advertising by making it newsworthy. I can only assume after watching the video that the people making their PR decisions are just that dense.

    --
    One last thing: Sometimes I wonder; "Is that someone's signature? Or do they type that at the end of each post?"
    1. Re:news. by magus_melchior · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Uh, no. Buckyballs' "inventor", Jake Bronstein, is a fool with a thin skin. Otherwise, he wouldn't call up his competitor with threatening language, nor would he file a frivolous and false DMCA takedown.

      Zen should keep their cool and stick to the facts, and Bronstein will exhaust himself in anger and lawyers.

      --
      "We are Microsoft. You shall be assimilated. Competition is futile."
  9. Re:Can Zen Magnets sue? by hedwards · · Score: 4, Informative
    Yeah, there are penalties. Out of 512. Limitations on liability relating to material online

    (f) Misrepresentations.— Any person who knowingly materially misrepresents under this section—
    (1) that material or activity is infringing, or
    (2) that material or activity was removed or disabled by mistake or misidentification,

    shall be liable for any damages, including costs and attorneys’ fees, incurred by the alleged infringer, by any copyright owner or copyright owner’s authorized licensee, or by a service provider, who is injured by such misrepresentation, as the result of the service provider relying upon such misrepresentation in removing or disabling access to the material or activity claimed to be infringing, or in replacing the removed material or ceasing to disable access to it.

  10. ThinkGeek by Jaysyn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Slashdot's sister company ThinkGeek sells Buckyballs. No, we don't get kickbacks, but we totally should.

    Perhaps your sister company should stop selling the products of a known DMCA abuser?

    --
    There is a war going on for your mind.
  11. Re:Hello Poison Control Hotline? by irving47 · · Score: 5, Informative

    All rare earth magnets are that way. They are especially concerned about them being swallowed separately or coming apart.... The problem being if they are in different stages of your intestines, they will attract each other and either stay right where they are, blocking flow of blood or other stuff, or maybe even wear right through the walls and make holes. Pretty nasty situation either way.

    --
    I had a sucky sig.
  12. It has gotten even uglier . . . by pariahdecss · · Score: 3, Funny

    Apparently now the makers of Ben Wa Balls ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ben_Wa_balls/ ) have gotten wind of this fracas and have filed their own injunction

  13. I had some on my kids' Christmas lists... no more by StuartHankins · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I will buy the Zen magnets instead. Screw the Buckyballs people for being such dicks.

  14. "the Internet routes around..." well, does it? by Tom · · Score: 2

    So, where are the mirrors? Who has copies of the video?

    Haven't we always thought that the Internet treats censorship as damage and routes around it? Well, where is the backup route?

    Hm, maybe all this centralized infrastructure in a few big providers does have some drawbacks after all...

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    1. Re:"the Internet routes around..." well, does it? by Coopjust · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's been mirrored by other people on Youtube.

  15. Service provider is immune; complainer is not by tepples · · Score: 4, Informative

    Does the DMCA offer any immunity to civil lawsuits for damages resulting from a [false/abusive] DMCA takedown notice?

    Per Title 17, United States Code, section 512, the service provider (e.g. YouTube) is immune to liability for the required two-week downtime after receipt of the counter-notification (512(g)(1)). But the complaining copyright owner is not immune (Lenz v. Universal).

  16. Re:big bucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Big Bucks No Whammies!!

  17. Toys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While some people argue over toys, there is a real life macro economic crisis brewing over some of the metals used in these toys..and in advanced tech useful products, the important stuff we all use. China is blocking the transfer of rare earth metals to Japan in a dispute over ocean territory and fishing rights, etc. More of a big dick contest with japan, and therefore the rest of the world, and I tell you, China will win that contest. At this minute, they are denying it is happening, but that seems to be spin. They made their point that even the threat of blocking these materials would cause severe economic harm to their competitors.

  18. Knowingly? by JSBiff · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I always love when they through in language like "knowingly", because, I'm no lawyer, but isn't it pretty hard to prove that someone 'knowingly' misrepresented. If they just say, "We didn't know", how do you counter that? The only way I can think of is if you happen to get lucky and find an email or other record of a private conversation between company employees where they essentially admit it.

    Also, to what extent can lawyers "shield" their clients? I.e. if a Client goes to their lawyer, and the lawyer tells them "yeah, that's infringing", even though it isn't, does the law hold the lawyer liable? I mean, if you acted on advice of your attorney, can you claim you didn't know you were making a misrepresentation (after all, your lawyer told you so, it's just your lawyer was wrong)? Is there anything to stop corrupt little deals where lawyers tell their clients what they want to hear, so that the client can act on advice of their attorney, and because the attorney doesn't face any penalties, it's all sort of 'legal'?

  19. Re:Obvious way to prove damages by Narcocide · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think actually the *AA takes your a) and multiplies that number by about 600 then uses the result to determine damages.

  20. Speaking from a Recent BuckyBalls Customer by kipin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I recently purchased 4 sets of BuckyBalls when they were recently on woot. I'm pretty pissed that I did now and want to show my support to Zen Magnets and buy a set of theirs. They seem to have much better quality from everything I have read and seen, and can attest to BuckyBalls "flakes" now coming off in my hand after using the magnets for about 2 weeks.

    From what I have heard, this company BuckyBalls made about $500,000 in sales from the woot sale (woot actually bought more from BuckyBalls on the day of the sale because demand was so strong), and $250,000 in sales on the day Google changed its logo to honor the Buckyball. Seems they may have grown too big for their britches and feel a sense of entitlement now.

    --
    If I can not smoke in heaven, then I shall not go. -- Mark Twain
    1. Re:Speaking from a Recent BuckyBalls Customer by pwnies · · Score: 2, Informative

      Playing the devil's advocate here, the flaking that you're experiencing will happen with all Neodymium Iron Boron magnets with nickel platting. The underlying metals are highly brittle, which means that continuous clacking together will eventually break off small pieces of the NdFeB under the nickel coating. This metal sand will no longer support the shape of the original coating, leading to warping, weakening, and eventually flaking of the nickel coating. The only thing that really determines the endurance is the depth of the coating, and Zen makes no claims that the depth of their coating is better (only that it's more shiny and possibly more uniform).
      As a disclaimer, I have not owned either zen or buckyball's magnets (although it's very possible that I've gotten magnets from the same supplier). I'm just a fan of the NdFeB magnets and have a moderate-large amount of experience with them.

  21. After watching the response... by definate · · Score: 4, Insightful

    LOL, After watching the response Zen Magnets vs Buckyballs Comparison Video, Zen Magnets seems far superior to BuckyBalls.

    Not because of product quality, though that seems significantly superior, but because they seem to be way more in tune with the nerd culture. Buckyballs should be ashamed of themselves for issuing a DMCA takedown notice. No geek/nerd would stoop so low.

    In comparison, Zen Magnets seems to be kicking it nerdcore, which is how I roll.

    ThinkGeek, you need to drop Buckyballs and pick up Zen Magnets. You gotta protect your nerd points, and getting behind a DMCA abuser, and a company which doesn't seem to understand the geek culture, is not cool. Drop Buckyballs, pick up Zen Magnets!

    --
    This is my footer. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  22. Re:Can Zen Magnets sue? by Teancum · · Score: 2, Informative

    The problem here is that while this may seem like abuse, I think the law is on the side of Buckyballs here in terms of a potential copyright violation. Fair use is a defense against copyright infringement and while you and I may think that the content is clearly used properly under fair use provisions, that is not a proven legal fact until it has been tested in court. The counter take-down notice (demanding that the content be restored) is indeed the proper legal remedy that should have been followed here, not suing Buckyballs into the ground on this issue.

    The voicemail and the images clearly are copyrighted by Buckyballs, and the DMCA notice was to take the content down. If you post something that contains copyrighted content belonging to somebody else, even if it being used under clear fair-use provisions, it can be subject to a DMCA take-down notice. If that happens to you, live with it and file the counter notice if you want it put back up... or simply live with it being gone.

    Where the penalties come in is if you start to file take down notices for things you don't even own or if you keep filing a take down notice for the same content (or similar content) even after it has gone to court where it has been proven as legitimate fair use. The above post by hedwards goes into the formal legal citation for this.

  23. And to think... by Majestix · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...I was going to buy some of the Buckyballs product when they arrived at the local game store next to my job. After this I think i'll give my business to the Zen folks.

    K

    --
    --- I was far from home, and the spell of the Eastern sea was upon me. -Lovecraft-
  24. Streisand effect by LordKronos · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hey Buckyballs...ever hear about the Streisand effect? Someone here in the office has a set of buckyballs and I thought they were pretty cool. I was thinking about picking up a set sometime. I've never heard of Zen Magnets before today. Now that I watched the video you had taken down, I'm thinking maybe Zen Magnets would be the better purchase. Thanks for helping me open my eyes to your competition.

    Definitely a bad PR move.

  25. Repeatability of Science by Myopic · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In the interest of peer-reviewed science, I was inspired to test my coworker's Bucky Balls using the Rigid Stick Test. When we made the rigid stick, it was much straighter than the one shown in the video. Then, when we pushed it over a ledge, it stood up to 27 balls. The video showed 24 for Bucky Balls and 25 for Zen Magnets, so I would say that the test would need repetition and graphing, like they did for the ball diameters.

    Still, I loved the video and I thought it was wonderful tongue-in-cheek advertising. It makes me want some Zen Magnets.

  26. Re:big bucks by Pikoro · · Score: 2, Funny

    ready annnnnnnd.... STOP!

    --
    "Freedom in the USA is not the ability to do what you want. It is the ability to stop others from doing what THEY want"
  27. Re:big bucks by EllisDees · · Score: 2, Funny

    $5000 and a spin!!

    --
    -- Give me ambiguity or give me something else!
  28. What about energy/supply efficiency? by swb · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm pretty sure I've read that buying a new refrigerator every N years pays for itself in energy efficiency, which leads me to question whether it's even a good idea to keep an appliance for 20+ years. Advances in materials, components and engineering can make appliances that use less power, water, refrigerant, etc.

    We replaced a 10 year old dishwasher a few years ago and I was pretty amazed at how well it works. It has a water cleanliness sensor that monitors wash water for particulates and it has a noticably shorter wash cycle when the dishes aren't very dirty, thus saving water, electricity and natural gas (hot water input).

  29. Re:Can Zen Magnets sue? by Coopjust · · Score: 4, Informative

    The voicemail was left on the mailbox of a recipient. A voicemail is a knowingly made recording, and one that has no reasonable expectation of privacy.

    I'm no lawyer, but if a voicemail sender retains copyright on their message, I have no idea how a site like Audioo (which shares embarrassing voicemails with the world) hasn't been sued into oblivion yet.

    As far as the images of Jake (Buckyballs CEO) used in the presentation go (which are images from Google Images, all freely available, used as a representation of a subject matter at a low resolution), I am extremely doubtful. I'm not a lawyer, and it's why Zen is consulting one.

    There was no other property belonging to Buckyballs. The trademark was identified as that of a competitor, so there's no basis for a trademark infringement claim. The rest of the video was recorded entirely by Zen Magnets.

  30. Re:Why you shouldn't buy Zen Magnets: by zenmagnets · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Less stress -- > Better health.

  31. Re:Hello Poison Control Hotline? by RealGrouchy · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you've accidentally swallowed one (or more) and you're worried they're still in your system, it's no big deal. Just go to a surgeon and get an MRI. He'll have them out in no time.

    - RG>

    --
    Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
  32. Re:Hello Poison Control Hotline? by Teancum · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It makes you wonder a bit about a cow magnet where you deliberately feed a magnet to livestock.

    This is used because many cows are so stupid that they will eat part of a barbed wire fence and other junk while grazing. Generally you don't feed the cows multiple magnets, and they stay in the rumen of the cow... a rather strange organ that is unique to cattle and other ruminants. Still, it is interesting that sometimes feeding magnets to creatures can be beneficial as well.

  33. Zen Magnets, unicorns, and gypsies by Cow+Jones · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I bought a magnet set from zenmagnets.com in April, and I love them. They're every bit as advertised, and delivery to Europe was only a little over a week. I can't attest to the quality of the BuckyBalls product, but what I can do is compare the companies' attitudes. We've just read what the BuckyBalls execs are like. As a contrast, here's the confirmation email I got from Zen Magnets after my purchase.

    HOORAY! I'm pleased to announce that your order ( #xxx ) has been processed and is now complete.

    Please rest assured that we hold great urgency to each and every shipment. We promise your order will be out of our door within 24 hours of receiving this email. Unless you selected a shipping service with tracking, there will not be an additional email.

    After a rigorous 4 step process of verifying the quality and consistency of each and every magnet, we donned silk gloves and placed it into a sacred padded envelope made of magic and lined with Unicorn fur, sealed the envelope with an adhesive made from strands of Gypsy hair, and wrapped the whole thing in a snazzy looking faux gold leaf paper, with elm leaf inlay from Costco. Unfortunately, by the time it gets to you, all of that fancy stuff will likely have been picked clean by the greedy postal service employees. Please don't be surprised to see just a plain padded envelope.

    Now which company would you rather do business with?

    CJ

    --

    Ah, arrogance and stupidity, all in the same package. How efficient of you. -- Londo Mollari