Slashdot Mirror


Apple vs. Google TVs

This SFGate article begins, "Apple and Google just kicked off the first round of their battle for the living room. Based on what we've seen so far, Apple is in the lead. It's still early, and this could change, but it looks like Apple is making an all-around smarter bet than Google." I haven't tried out the Google device yet. The Apple unit is decent, but it's so focused on TV rental that it makes it difficult to work with an existing library of media; between the transcoding, and tedious menu navigation... well, it's a good thing it's only $99. It's a dang cheap way to get your stuff on your bigger screens, provided you're willing to jump through the necessary hoops.

6 of 403 comments (clear)

  1. Based on what we've seen so far by Culture20 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Based on what we've seen so far, Apple is in the lead"

    Really? Based on what I've seen so far, regular television manufacturers are in the lead.

  2. Re:Missing the point. by Darkness404 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Content Playback: Ten years ago, it was .MPGs and .AVIs. Five years ago, a DiVX at sufficiently high resolution could drag a single-core CPU to the ground. You really think that Google TV's gonna be able to render 3D-mega-HD-whatever in 2015-2020? :)

    And you really think your TV that is 1080p is going to support 4320p content when its released? So long as the GoogleTV box can play 1080p back on your 1080p TV its not going to matter if it can play 4320p or whatever content because the extra resolution would be lost because your TV is only capable of supporting 1080p.

    --
    Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
  3. Prey.. meet bait. by EasyTarget · · Score: 4, Insightful

    it's a good thing it's only $99

    Oh no it isn't....

    That's merely the entrance fee.. Admission to individual attractions, food, beverage and use of toilets is all extra.

    --
    "Oops, I always forget the purpose of competition is to divide people into winners and losers." - Hobbes
  4. Re:Wait for it... by Myopic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well, the important thing is that you have found a way to feel superior to those people, who feel superior to you. It's a wonderful cycle where everybody wins.

  5. Re:3 Menu Clicks by h4rr4r · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Plugging in one HDMI cable.

  6. Re:the transcoding... by dzfoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not true. From the AppleTV web page:

    Audio formats supported:

    • HE-AAC (V1), AAC (16 to 320 Kbps), protected AAC (from iTunes Store), MP3 (16 to 320 Kbps), MP3 VBR, Audible (formats 2, 3, and 4), Apple Lossless, AIFF, and WAV; Dolby Digital 5.1 surround sound pass-through

    If what you want is for Apple to support specifically FLAC, then say so. Do not taint your comment with inferences that Apple only supports its own proprietary standards.

    Many of the standards supported by iOS devices in general, and AppleTV in particular, are indeed what is already out there on the web and supported by many other major consumer device vendors, including Television Sets and media players.

    They may not be royalty-free or have an open source implementation available, but that is hardly the same as trying to get the web to conform to Apple's desires. Besides, this is a device to be used with a TV, not a web browser.

            -dZ.

    --
    Carol vs. Ghost
    ...Can you save Christmas?