Negroponte On OLPC's New Path, Plans For XO 3
waderoush writes "After laying off staff and splitting the organization in two, Nicholas Negroponte and the One Laptop Per Child effort may be hitting their stride again. In an interview with Xconomy, Negroponte says he has a new model for getting XO laptops to kids in Gaza and Afghanistan — and reveals more ideas about the planned XO 3 tablet and the future of books. 'Paper books are really dead — they're gone. And they're not being killed by tablets, they're creating tablets,' he says."
And seeing as I have no tablet or kindle or iPad or nook or whatever the hell, I shall keep reading them.
From my cold dead hands Mr Negroponte.
"'Paper books are really dead — they're gone. And they're not being killed by tablets, they're creating tablets,' he says.""
He sounds totally rooted in reality to me.
OLPC needs to reel in its ambitions and focus on something it can deliver as promised. These guys are starting to corner the market in low cost vaporware and pipe dreams.
Seriously, why doesn't paste work in this stupid box any more? (Google Chrome 6.0.472.63, btw)
Anyway
Negroponte says he has a new model for getting XO laptops to kids in Gaza and Afghanistan
Now you see why the US didn't sign on to the treaty banning cluster bombs - they are planning to use them to deliver XO laptops.
It's cheaper, faster, and much safer for the delivery person.
Putting moderation advice in your
First I had to get up and retrieve it from its special storage shelf. I was surprised at how heavy it was. It didn't have any search functionality, so I had to manually find the index, and then find my search term in the index. The pages didn't have any backlighting, so I had to move it to face the light so I could read it easily. The contrast ratio was rather poor. Most of the words in the book were not indexed at all, but luckily my search term was present. I couldn't click it, and I had to manually find the correct page again. There wasn't any highlighting either, so I had to manually search the page too. I read my information, and them put the book back onto its storage shelf where it uses a ridiculously huge amount of space.
On the plus side, the resolution was high, but that's not enough to make up for all the other annoyances. Books are obsolete.
Books are quickly accessible, portable, need no batteries and just feel good in your hand while reading them.
I doubt books will ever die, unless we elect Sarah Palin for President.
He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
According to TFA they've already placed around 3,000 there, so... yes?
Indeed, and liquid is not vaprous.
Cheers,
"What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
"A four-foot prune."
I wonder if you can run Duke Nukem Forever on the XO.
There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
Or like radio, yeah, remember how TV killed radio? Or the VCR, remember how that killed the cinema?
Meh. Sure, the market for paper books might shrink back from its peak, but it's not disappearing, and certainly not overnight.
In the immortal words of Bugs Bunny, What a maroon!
Cheers,
"What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
"A four-foot prune."
> 'Paper books are really dead -- they're gone. And they're not being killed by tablets, they're creating tablets,' he says.
Meanwhile, elsewhere on the /. home page...
Oxford University's Bodleian Library has purchased a huge £26m warehouse to give a proper home to over 6 million books and 1.2 million maps
'Paper books are really dead — they're gone. And they're not being killed by tablets, they're creating tablets,' he says."
Um, just yesterday I ordered a paper book for myself. About 2 weeks ago I loaned a whole box of books to someone (I'm expecting them back in January) and my university booklist threatens to take the rest of my money.
I don't think paper books are dead at all.
I know someone that has a tablet, and I've fiddled around with it for a while. It's not nearly as good as a physical paper book. I usually spread my books out while reading so that I can compare things, and a tablet would not allow that. The tablet I saw just doesn't have the reading space that my books have. It being smaller and so on. I'm sure there's tons more reasons why paper books are still better than tablets.
Tablets are pretty cool things though. They could replace books one day, but goodness knows they'll get locked down like so many other modern devices. At least I am certain that my physical books will always belong to me, and that I won't get sued for using it in a study group where everyone can see.
Do people really take such over the top wheedling seriously? And why would an otherwise pretty sharp guy say such a narrowminded blindered thing? Books are doing just fine, despite the coolness factor of OLPC or tablets or handhelds. People like them, use them, buy then, and keep them. And 100 years from now they'll still have them, unlike most digital ephemera. We're still working on getting good conversion of writing to text, but preserving writing on paper was mastered a few thousand years ago.
Behold, this dreamer cometh. Come now, and let us slay him... and we shall see what will become of his dreams.
As long as Negroponte remains in charge of his baby the OLPC will never really take off. Eventually iPad technology will become cheap enough for the Third World. Too bad we have to wait for that to happen.
"You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"