Slashdot Mirror


Small Asteroid To Pass Close To Earth Tomorrow

Matt_dk writes "A small asteroid will pass very close to Earth this Tuesday. Astronomers are still tracking the object, now designated as 2010 TD54, and various estimates say it should come within anywhere from 52,000 km (33,000 miles) to 64,000 km (40,000 miles) on October 12, with closest approach at approximately 11:25 UT."

126 comments

  1. Fuuny coincidence? by ls671 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In other news "retired Air Force officer, Stanley A. Fulham", whoever that guy might be, "predicts October 13, 2010 as the date for a massive UFO display over the world’s principal cities". ;-) Given the distance, can we really be sure it is an asteroid ?

    http://www.disclose.tv/forum/october-13-2010-worldwide-ufo-display-t33304.html

    --
    Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    1. Re:Fuuny coincidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course we can't. Any alien spacecraft capable of traveling across interstellar space to Earth would have to be much more advanced than any technology that we have. They could be stealthy beyond our imagination. That also implies that we have absolutely no way of telling whether or not they are here already.

      I think this is the best SETI attempt so far. And I mean that quite seriously: http://ieti.org/hello/index.html

      I don't think that they are here by the way. They're probably too busy doing alien stuff.

    2. Re:Fuuny coincidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't necessarily think they are stealthy just because they have the technology to travel long distances.

      Consider how magical a jet airplane would be to the people that first circumnavigated the globe in wooden boats.

    3. Re:Fuuny coincidence? by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      X-37B? Oh, wait, they found that already. holy crap, there really is an app for that...

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    4. Re:Fuuny coincidence? by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 1

      Nice, but a real pity...I was really enjoying it up until:

      ...through the services of a world renowned channeler, the author has communicated with an ethereal group of entities known as the Transcendors... "

      --
      Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
    5. Re:Fuuny coincidence? by ls671 · · Score: 1

      In realty, we are called the Asgards, how dare you doubt our existence ?

      We continue to exist and influence things long after the last of us has left its primitive physical body ;-)

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    6. Re:Fuuny coincidence? by x2A · · Score: 1

      "I don't think that they are here by the way. They're probably too busy doing alien stuff"

      Rectal probing rednecks?!! Eeek, that means that they are here!! That's like, proof or something!

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    7. Re:Fuuny coincidence? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Agreed. If our puny weapons wouldn't even dent their equimolecular unobtainium hulls they'd have no need to be stealthy.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    8. Re:Fuuny coincidence? by Archades54 · · Score: 1

      But a jet flying at night/under cover of darkness etc is somewhere that woodenboattimesfolk wouldn't be able to see/detect so the jet would easily be stealthy if flying high at night, painted black.

      Da Alienz could simply know where we're looking and be avoiding those areas, or finding ways to hide like inside large storms (no idea if humans can see inside a tornado fully, so it's a wild guess) or hell even be hiding in a volcano, or deeeeeeep in the ocean.

      We still haven't explored all of this planet as far as I know, of course if we have then ignore this and go find ET.

      --
      If your neighbours roof is flying past your window, you know it's cyclone season.
  2. Just in case... by kellyb9 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Please place Bruce Willis on standby.

    1. Re:Just in case... by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      nah, leave that annoying Russian guy on the asteroid instead.

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    2. Re:Just in case... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't we just strap Ben Affleck to a rocket instead?

    3. Re:Just in case... by raphael75 · · Score: 0

      Place Space Battleship Yamato on standby. The Gamelons must be stopped!

    4. Re:Just in case... by countSudoku() · · Score: 1

      Giant, triangular spaceship at the ready. (pew pew pew) You have impulse engines and HyperSpace too, just hit the "HyperSpace" button, or pull back on the stick, if a dedicated button is unavailable. You have three chances. Watch out when the asteroid breaks into slightly smaller chunks! Oh, and there might be an alien or two out to shoot at you. Other than that should be smooth asteroid hunting. Good luck, Captain!

      --
      This is the NSA, we're gonna geet U h@x0r5! Also, what is a h@x0r5?
    5. Re:Just in case... by bwintx · · Score: 1

      nah, leave that annoying Russian guy on the asteroid instead.

      But be sure to take his wrench. You never know...

      --
      Discussion System prefs link: http://slashdot.org/users.pl?op=editcomm
    6. Re:Just in case... by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

      Please place Bruce Willis on standby.

      Yet another stupid movie. 1st off, they'll need to reach the asteroid when it is within the shuttle's range (600 miles), which gives them about 1 second to drill their hole, insert the a-bomb, and detonate it. Which would just leave a large cluster of radioactive debris crashing into the Earth a few seconds later.

      Even if you extended the Shuttles range 10x, that would still give you less than a minute to do something.

      Blowing it up into tiny fragments would still not stop it's destructive effects. All that mass is still going to crash into the Earth, with all the fun heating properties, would still fry anything that happens to be living underneath it.

      And what type of drill bit will wear out drilling through a supposedly mostly ice comet?

      Stupid movie. You almost expect them to be attacked by space zombies.

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    7. Re:Just in case... by maxume · · Score: 4, Funny

      Did you miss the part where the movie starred Bruce Willis?

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    8. Re:Just in case... by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 1

      I've been hoping for that for years.

      --
      Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
    9. Re:Just in case... by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 1

      Works for me.

      --
      Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
    10. Re:Just in case... by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Hey! What did Yakov ever do to you? And where would /. be without the Russian Reversal? In Soviet Russia Asteroid leaves annoying YOU!

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    11. Re:Just in case... by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      I admit I don't get whatever reference you're trying to make here.

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    12. Re:Just in case... by SudoGhost · · Score: 1

      Stupid movie.

      I've never seen a major blockbuster movie where everyone agrees, "That's exactly how it works in real life!"

      Movies are stupid. They're fantasy, an escape from reality. That's how they work.

  3. teh centauri are invading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they are doing to us what they did to the narn and hurling meteors at us form there mass driver weapons , having to be way back off in solar system means they cant be too accurate

    1. Re:teh centauri are invading by Pojut · · Score: 1

      Are you sure Centauri isn't planning on dropping a bunch of arcade machines?

    2. Re:teh centauri are invading by Chris+Burke · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nonsense. This was obviously a rock launched via Bug Plasma, an attack which fortunately will miss us. Join the Mobile Infantry and fight back before they succeed and destroy Buenos Aires!

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    3. Re:teh centauri are invading by Zider · · Score: 2, Funny

      Would you like to know more?

    4. Re:teh centauri are invading by rhyder128k · · Score: 2, Funny

      Unisex showers, baby! Of course I'd like to know more.

      --
      Michael Reed, freelance tech writer.
    5. Re:teh centauri are invading by rhyder128k · · Score: 1

      Thems there mass drivers over there, you mean?

      --
      Michael Reed, freelance tech writer.
    6. Re:teh centauri are invading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm doing my part!

    7. Re:teh centauri are invading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unisex showers? I don't know how that would work, they'd have to like, cut off all your junk...

      I think you mean "coed" showers.

  4. Not a lot of advance warning... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I was kinda alarmed when I read the name "2010 T" which means it was discovered in the first half of October, 2010 (as opposed to discovered in the second half via time travel). And in fact TFA says it was discovered Oct 9.

    TFA also says it's a pretty small asteroid only a few meters across, which is a pretty good excuse for not finding it sooner (and makes it Mostly Harmless), but still... More funding to asteroid finding/tracking pls thx.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
    1. Re:Not a lot of advance warning... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DISCOVERED BY TIME TRAVEL

      i think you're onto something

    2. Re:Not a lot of advance warning... by GrumblyStuff · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Heh, yeah, I can see it now.

      "Why does the President want to spend money looking at the sky?! He should be looking at the bottom line!"

      "Is there something he doesn't want us to find on the ground?"

      "Look, the Earth is 75% water and only half of it would be facing bombardment. Add that up and we've got a negative 25% chance to be hit!"

      "Asteroid monitoring? What's the use in that?"
      Cue asteroid strike a la Bobby Jindal and volcano monitoring.

    3. Re:Not a lot of advance warning... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your comment isn't the only one, but it always strikes me as highly bizarre what kind of idiotic, twisted reasons people come up with why the government just HAS to support their pet projects (and, for that matter, how even the staunchest libertarians always seem to turn into government fanboys when it's THEIR pet projects that's on the line).

      Not that there's necessarily anything wrong with wanting decent funding for NASA, but why not just say that it's because you think space travel is cool, that exploration and science for the sake of it is neat, and that we, as a nation, would be poorer if it was cut - just like we'd be poorer if there were no museums, no theaters, no libraries etc.? Why all this claptrap about "we need to avoid meteor strikes", or "we need to figure out a way to colonize space so we'll be able to escape Earth in five billion years when the sun turns into a red giant", and all the things that nerds seem to come up with?

  5. oblig by gandhi_2 · · Score: 1

    no bigger than a chihuahua's head.

    1. Re:oblig by samkass · · Score: 1

      Or about the size of 1 book from the Library of Congress.

      --
      E pluribus unum
    2. Re:oblig by laejoh · · Score: 1

      "Que sera, sera, Whatever will be, will be; The future's not ours to see. Que sera, sera, What will be, will be."

    3. Re:oblig by laejoh · · Score: 1

      Whoosh... Thats the sound of a small asteroid going over your head.

  6. Why is this news? by chemicaldave · · Score: 1
    FTFA

    A five-meter-sized near-Earth asteroid from the undiscovered population of about 30 million would be expected to pass daily within a lunar distance, and one might strike Earth’s atmosphere about every 2 years on average.If an asteroid of the size of 2010 TD54 were to enter Earth’s atmosphere, it would be expected to burn up high in the atmosphere and cause no damage to Earth’s surface.

    Is it because we know about it? If this happens daily and would cause no harm if striking the Earth...then why is it newsworthy?

    1. Re:Why is this news? by vlm · · Score: 1

      Is it because we know about it?

      Bingo. This time we found it 2 or so days ahead of closest approach. Usually we don't find out until you look up and see a meteor streaking across the sky, or even worse, discover it a couple days later in historical photos.

      I always thought from a ham radio perspective it would be interesting to try "scheduled meteor scatter" not where you schedule an attempt in a general sense and hope a meteor flys by, but where you select your little individual tiny meteor. Would certainly save a lot of overheated amplifiers.

      "OK you transmit first on the impact of 2010-TD245 at 1307Z. 73 and good luck"

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    2. Re:Why is this news? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Informative

      First, yes, because we know about it.

      Second, because this is actually passing much closer than the lunar orbit and is thus not a daily event.

      Third, because we do know about it, but also know it would most likely cause no damage, is information worth conveying.

      Fourth, because some of us are quite interested in space and space objects and the field of asteroid tracking, especially as it relates to near earth objects.

      Fifth, because there's a slim chance we could see it! TFA says you'd need a "moderate" sized telescope, which could mean a lot of things in different contexts. The JPL NEO tracker page gives an absolute planetary magnitude of 28, which if my math is right is 10.8 apparent magnitude ideally (i.e. appears 'full' from our perspective, is roughly spherical etc) Which would be within the capabilities of plenty of amateur telescopes.

      Ultimately and obviously, how much this is newsworthy to you is subjective. But I think it's cool.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    3. Re:Why is this news? by Nethead · · Score: 1

      Normally the term "meteor scatter" describes using the ion trail of micrometeors (sand size and smaller) to bounce a VHF/UHF signal further than line of sight.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meteor_burst_communications

      73 de w7com

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    4. Re:Why is this news? by Spatial · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Check out this video.

      An animated overview of the Solar System showing the last 30 years of asteroid discoveries and their orbits. It's to scale, created from real data. Pretty awesome.

    5. Re:Why is this news? by NemoinSpace · · Score: 1

      I only believe half of what i read.
      You: Second, because this is actually passing much closer than the lunar orbit and is thus not a daily event.
      TFA: A five-meter-sized near-Earth asteroid from the undiscovered population of about 30 million would be expected to pass daily within a lunar distance,
      Guess which half?

    6. Re:Why is this news? by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      I guess it is obvious now that I read the article, but I find it interesting that the meteors that actually hit the earth must be a lot bigger than people think before they hit the atmosphere. Since they say this one would probably burn up and not even hit the earth were it even on a collision course, how big does an asteroid have to be in order to actually impact?

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    7. Re:Why is this news? by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      I'm simply astounded we've lasted this long with all that galactic crap floating around.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    8. Re:Why is this news? by bhartman34 · · Score: 1

      Luckily, a lot of it gets mopped up by Jupiter, from what I understand...

    9. Re:Why is this news? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      We certainly would want astronomy to interfere with an Apple story on /., now would we~

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    10. Re:Why is this news? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I don't get your meaning. Are you saying you think they're low-balling the number of asteroids that pass within a lunar distance to earth? Or high-balling? Because otherwise, it's kind of a given that if passing within a lunar distance is a daily event, that passing much closer would be much-squared less frequent.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
  7. Geosync is only 26200 miles by vlm · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Geosync is only 26200 miles ... the uncertainty is almost large enough that it could hit a geosync satellite. If only they provided a std deviation or some other probability metric.

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    1. Re:Geosync is only 26200 miles by Phleg · · Score: 1

      There is a lot of volume in space. The odds that this hits any satellite in orbit are virtually nil.

      --
      No comment.
    2. Re:Geosync is only 26200 miles by kellyb9 · · Score: 3, Funny

      There is a lot of volume in space.

      Incorrect... there is no sound in space.

    3. Re:Geosync is only 26200 miles by jayrtfm · · Score: 1

      put one pin on a random lane in a bowling alley. Blindfold yourself at the entrance to the alley, then walk to the lane and bowl the pin down.
      It's kinda like that, only the pin is also moving at 7,000 mph

    4. Re:Geosync is only 26200 miles by aarenz · · Score: 1

      The damage that would be done if it took out a core communication sat is very high, so you need to balance that into the overall risk calculation, so even very low probability equates to high risk when multiplied on financial and social impact. Or is this just being put out by North Korea to cover up their latest attempt to take down a satellite?

    5. Re:Geosync is only 26200 miles by dmgxmichael · · Score: 1

      As is the bowling ball.

    6. Re:Geosync is only 26200 miles by vlm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      put one pin on a random lane in a bowling alley. Blindfold yourself at the entrance to the alley, then walk to the lane and bowl the pin down.
      It's kinda like that, only the pin is also moving at 7,000 mph

      And the pin is a critical piece of national infrastructure, that costs $10B to replace, with a multi year lead time... and you don't get to toss one ball, but randomly a couple per month, almost all of which we don't know about until after the ball is thrown... I wouldn't expect failure every time, or even a given time, but its gotta happen sooner or later.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    7. Re:Geosync is only 26200 miles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no one can hear you scream

    8. Re:Geosync is only 26200 miles by RaymondKurzweil · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      This sounds like a great way to end up getting raped.

    9. Re:Geosync is only 26200 miles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Incorrect... he is saying that there is too much "space" in space for the asteroid to be likely to hit a satellite.

    10. Re:Geosync is only 26200 miles by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 1

      There is a lot of volume in space.

      I believe this is what you meant to say.

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
    11. Re:Geosync is only 26200 miles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then define your timescale?? Hasn't happened yet. And people are putting satellites up into space for the last 50 years!

      It's heck of a lot more likely that a solar storm will kill a satellite than anything extraterrestrial hit it.

    12. Re:Geosync is only 26200 miles by TheDormouse · · Score: 1
    13. Re:Geosync is only 26200 miles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh my god! OH MY GOD!!!!!!! WE'RE ALL GOING TO DIE!!!!!!!!

      Yes, it will eventually happen, but no, the odds of it happening are unimaginably small

    14. Re:Geosync is only 26200 miles by Nyeerrmm · · Score: 1

      The JPL HORIZONS data tend to have covariance data for their ephemerides. Might look it up there if you're interested. Unfortunately, six-state covariance matrices don't fit well in public articles, a range of values which probably correspond to an RMS 3-sigma value are the best you're going to get.

    15. Re:Geosync is only 26200 miles by net28573 · · Score: 1

      can someone less lazy than i please link this guy to the satellite clutter and junk article about how badly cluttered it is up there

      --
      RIP TRICERATOPS, YOU NEVER EXISTED
    16. Re:Geosync is only 26200 miles by arisvega · · Score: 1

      .. and the error bar roughly equals the Earth's diameter. So it might hit the Earth. Or it mightn't.

      --
      The three laws of thermodynamics:(1) You can't win. (2) You can't break even. (3) You can't even quit.
  8. This is a bit worrisome . . . by themoneyish · · Score: 0
    FTFA:

    A telescope of the NASA-sponsored Catalina Sky Survey north of Tucson, Arizona discovered 2010 TD54 on Oct. 9 at (12:55 a.m. PDT) during routine monitoring of the skies.

    . . . if an asteroid can get this close to us without our knowledge until 3 days before a flyby, the Pan-STARRS isn't doing enough to detect NEOs in advance.

    1. Re:This is a bit worrisome . . . by ravenspear · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not worrisome at all. It was not detected until then because it is very small and poses no threat even if it impacts. It's much easier to find larger objects. If an object large enough to cause a global catastrophe was on it's way toward us, we would have way more advance warning than 3 days with these kinds of efforts.

    2. Re:This is a bit worrisome . . . by dugjohnson · · Score: 2, Funny

      If an object large enough to cause a global catastrophe was on it's way toward us, we would have way more advance warning than 3 days with these kinds of efforts.

      So we'd have plenty of time to get out of the way....whew!

      --
      My brain is overly lubricated
    3. Re:This is a bit worrisome . . . by Phleg · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Unfortunately, no. About half the asteroids that could hit us come from the daytime sky (e.g., from the direction of the sun). We stand essentially zero chance of spotting any of these any time in the near future.

      --
      No comment.
    4. Re:This is a bit worrisome . . . by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      About half the asteroids that could hit us come from the daytime sky

      Well this is obviously why we have observatories in Australia. Duh!

    5. Re:This is a bit worrisome . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see you still believe in the geocentric constellation...

    6. Re:This is a bit worrisome . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That also means that half the asteroids that could hit us come from the nighttime sky... so the odds are 50-50...

    7. Re:This is a bit worrisome . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It all depends on the scale of the catastrophe, not all may be global.

      Spotting a city killer sized object and knowing it's trajectory far enough in advance would realistically warrant an evacuation order. If I had knowledge that my town would be a smoking crater in two weeks, sure I'd like to know to start packing the bug-out bag and get the hell outta dodge. (A nuke still might be useful against one this small, yet I wouldn't put a guarantee on it. "Buckshotting" one this size may count as a win though, since most wouldn't make anywhere near the ground. Interestingly enough, the copper slug in NASA's Deep Impact mission has dimensions and a mass that nearly match a complete Mk-12 warhead assembly with a W62. At least based on comparing the Wikipedia info... So somebody must have considered it.)

      If it was more of a regional killer type thing, you'd know something's up. You'd hear about the asteroid being spotted. But then in some part of the world - there would be massive military movement. Presumably to get the troops out of harm's way, and perhaps stage some kind of recovery operation in the aftermath.

      However if it's too damn big you're probably better off not knowing. Can't do shit in that case anyways.

    8. Re:This is a bit worrisome . . . by ravenspear · · Score: 1

      Huh? Any extremely large object is going to be noticed more than a year before it hits. The earth rotates around the sun, giving us no more than a few months blindness to any one direction.

    9. Re:This is a bit worrisome . . . by geekoid · · Score: 1

      It depends on it's approach to the earth. Coming from the direction of the sun, then maybe not.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    10. Re:This is a bit worrisome . . . by Phleg · · Score: 1

      There are a stupefying number of untracked asteroids out there, including ones with irregular orbits that could easily be too far away or simply missed while we're both on the same side of the sun. Also, an asteroid doesn't have to be extremely large to cause an incredible amount of damage. Even an asteroid only a little bigger than this flyby could level a city. Tunguska was estimated to only be a few tens of meters across.

      And that's not even considering asteroids with insanely low albedo. We're not even close to tracking a significant fraction of the asteroids out there, much less all of the ones we should worry about.

      --
      No comment.
  9. close? by rossdee · · Score: 1

    from TFA:
      "its closest approach to Earth's surface at an altitude of about 45,000 kilometers"

    Only in astronomical terms would 45,000 KM be called close...

      "At that time, the asteroid will be over southeastern Asia in the vicinity of Singapore. "

    And I would not call 45,000km as "in the vicinity of' when even South America is only about 1/5 of the distance further away...

    1. Re:close? by gmuslera · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In a sense, is far, is more than 3 whole earths side to side of distance. No, you will not hear a "zing!" when it passes over.

      In the other hand, was discovered just 2 days ago. If a bigger one coming with a bit more accuracy is discovered now won't be anything that could be done, the plans that are actually to deal with possible impacts implies maybe years,

    2. Re:close? by amRadioHed · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think what they mean to say is that the point on the Earth that the asteroid will be directly over at closest approach is in the vicinity of Singapore, not the asteroid itself.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    3. Re:close? by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      That's a helluva lot closer than the moon, and most people consider that pretty close.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    4. Re:close? by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      In space, the sound you hear is not Doppler.

  10. Hot fudge Sundae? by frodo527 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Does Hot Fudge Sundae fall on Tuesdae this year?

    --
    http://blogostuff.blogspot.com/
    1. Re:Hot fudge Sundae? by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      Did this get modded offtopic by someone who just didn't get the Lucifer's Hammer reference?

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
  11. Comparisons by pgn674 · · Score: 5, Informative

    International Space Station: 229 miles
    Geosynchronous orbit: 26,200 miles
    Moon: 236,216 miles

    1. Re:Comparisons by aarenz · · Score: 3, Informative

      Please read article, the distance is measured from the center of the earth. So it is only 28,000 miles from the surface, which is right in the gesynch range, based on size, composition and speed, it could vary more than 2,000 miles during its pass near our big old earth. Goodbye dish network, or maybe that sat phone uplink from midway island.

    2. Re:Comparisons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kilometers, metric is superior, stupid americans, catch up with the rest of the world, cream cheese, etc.

    3. Re:Comparisons by syousef · · Score: 1

      International Space Station: 229 miles

      Geosynchronous orbit: 26,200 miles

      Moon: 236,216 miles

      What about the important stuff? Nearest McDonalds?

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  12. I'm not. by AnonymousClown · · Score: 1
    I'm never alarmed at this kind of stuff. Same thing with terrorism.

    OTOH, driving (traffic accidents) and heart disease is something that I'm mildly concerned about. The odds are, those are things will take me out prematurely.

    --
    RIP America

    July 4, 1776 - September 11, 2001

    1. Re:I'm not. by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure if all you care about is yourself.

      Me, I think it's pretty rational to be alarmed by things with the highest probability of killing me or someone I love, or things with a very low probability of killing me, everyone I know and love, and possibly the entire human species.

      In the latter category asteroid impacts would be less alarming than the Cuban Missile Crisis, but I think my level of concern is commensurate with that reality.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    2. Re:I'm not. by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the way things are going, I think it's much more likely that all of us (or a large number of us) die off from simultaneous heart attacks, then the odds of getting hit by a species killing asteroid. To be more serious, it's much more likely that someone in my family, or a large part of my family will be taken out by a single event like a car crash. I think the most likely things we should worry about, even if we aren't selfish are heart attacks and car crashes. That's why I ride a bike everywhere. Helps fend off heart attacks, and probably less dangerous than being in a car, even if I'm on the same roads.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    3. Re:I'm not. by Nyeerrmm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Alarmed is certainly an overreaction. However, that doesn't mean it should be ignored -- kind of like terrorism. Plus, unlike terrorism, taking precautions on the NEO threat doesn't interfere with civil rights, and hasn't seen significant overreaction on the part of the general public.

      Detection programs cost tens of millions of dollars, and even a mitigation testbed for a modest sized asteroid is only around $500 million. These kinds of programs have scientific benefit as well (and costs are on par with other space science efforts,) so it has value beyond the NEO threat.

      Additionally, the threat is not just from extinction-class asteroids, but smaller asteroids that can cause regional destruction. These are expected to occur on a much more regular basis (hundred-ish years). If something like Tunguska were to occur over a populated area, the material damage would be far greater than the cost of NEO programs, and that doesn't even include loss of life.

    4. Re:I'm not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me, I think it's pretty rational to be alarmed by things with the highest probability of killing me or someone I love,

      Yes.

      or things with a very low probability of killing me, everyone I know and love, and possibly the entire human species.

      No.

      Are you *really* unable to tell the difference, and understand why the latter isn't worth worrying about?

    5. Re:I'm not. by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Are you *really* unable to tell the difference, and understand why the latter isn't worth worrying about?

      Obviously I'm able to tell the difference, having explained it. And obviously you're unable understand why the latter is worth some degree of concern.

      Your risk assessment only includes the probability of an outcome and not the cost of that outcome, and thus you fail risk assessment.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
  13. Hype? by Anomalyx · · Score: 2, Informative
    From TFA:

    A five-meter-sized near-Earth asteroid from the undiscovered population of about 30 million would be expected to pass daily within a lunar distance, and one might strike Earth’s atmosphere about every 2 years on average.

    So really this happens all the time.

    If an asteroid of the size of 2010 TD54 were to enter Earth's atmosphere, it would be expected to burn up high in the atmosphere and cause no damage to Earth's surface.

    AND nobody will notice if it does decide to visit our planet. Maybe it will even hit one of those "dead satellites" and do its bit to clean up the junk in geosync for us.

    I suspect this article is nothing but NASA's way of saying "moar $$$ pl0x!!!!!1"

    --
    No, there is no "-1 I'LL NEVER ADMIT BEING WRONG!!!" mod.
    1. Re:Hype? by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I know you're being sarcastic, but if it did nail a GEO sat, that would make the GEO orbit belt a lot messier and more dangerous...

    2. Re:Hype? by jaa101 · · Score: 1

      Yes, it happens all the time and satellites get hit way less than the earth because, think about it, their surface area is *way* less. Sadly, hitting satellites will make the orbital debris problem worse since every hit just makes more smaller pieces. Even little pieces are a disaster for other satellites at 10km/second, though they fall out of orbit faster.

      Interestingly, the frequency of hits is inversely proportional to mass (weight) of the object. Guessing this thing weighs about a 100 tonnes (probably more) and one hits earth every two years (burning up in the atmosphere). That means a 1000 tonne object will hit about every 20 years and a 10000 tonne object every 200 years, etc. ... on average. It also means 1 gram objects (a millionth of a tonne) hit the earth about once a second ... making shooting stars.

    3. Re:Hype? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, this is not a videogame. Space junk, on impact, doesn't disappear, it disintegrates into smaller pieces of space junk moving in unpredictable directions. Yes, some of those will burn up in the atmosphere; some of it won't. A guide to further reading: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kessler_syndrome

    4. Re:Hype? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      If ti heats a satellite, it could trigger a cascade event by spreading debris. So yeah, it could be an huge issue.
      It's an important issue, and there needs to be funding for a global search for the objects.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  14. OMG OMG OMG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OMG it's going to hit us!

  15. In related news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...I will be passing gas near Earth tomorrow.

  16. Small Asteroid To Pass Close To Earth Tomorrow.... by afabbro · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...but will not, alas, hit it.

    Why is the post-apocalyptic paradise just out of reach? After 40 years of Cold War teasing, I was almost ready to give up hope, but asteroids still mock us. I cry at all the missed opportunities.

    --
    Advice: on VPS providers
  17. If I might be so bold by DryGrian · · Score: 1

    All of you showing concern over this event should have a gander at orbit@home, a distributed computing approach to monitoring near-Earth asteroid activity.

    --
    For optimal comment enjoyment, take red pill now.
  18. Russian Reversal (with Magic card) by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    Good use of the Russian Reversal there I'll admit, but I was talking about Peter Stormare's Lev Andropov character in the 1998 film, in case y'all didn't pick up on that.

    My previously-designed Magic card for Yakov:

    Name: Yakov Smirnoff
    Mana Cost: 1 Blue, 1 Colorless
    Legendary Creature - Human
    Rules Text: Untap Yakov, pay 1, say something that refers to a Slashdot meme: Switch target creature’s power and toughness until end of turn.
    Flavor Text: In Soviet Cartamundi plant, cardboard prints YOU!
    Power/Toughness: 2/1

    (This is a joke card, but there is an actual ability now [premiered in 2008's _Shadowmoor_] that has you untap a creature to use an ability, instead of tapping like, say, Prodigal Sorcerer.
    http://magiccards.info/shm/en/16.html for example

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    1. Re:Russian Reversal (with Magic card) by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      I knew who you were talking about (yet another reason why /. needs joke and sarcasm tags) but here "annoying Russian" is a title usually reserved for old Yakov, who BTW is running his place down in Branson. My GF went and saw him not too long ago and says like Henny Youngman kept beating the dead horse he is still cranking out the old Russian reversal. Personally i thought Stormare should have gotten more credit for playing Lucifer in Constantine. Sure the movie itself wasn't great but Stormare gave Lucifer that nice demeanor with a dark undercurrent of malice. I thought Pacino went a little too overboard in his portrayal, the only other recent I thought was good was Viggo Mortensen in the original prophecy. Stormare gets a lot of credit for his comedy (like the crazy Russian cosmonaut) but he is actually a damned good dramatic actor as well.

      As for the Yakov playing card? All I can say is "Look Ogre, a nerd!" Ogre: "NERDS!"

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    2. Re:Russian Reversal (with Magic card) by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      I am not really up on films for the most part, old or new, so I'm gonna have to trust you on that one. :P

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    3. Re:Russian Reversal (with Magic card) by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Nice thing about the net is, you don't. Here is Stormare, Pacino and Pacino Pt2 and finally Mortensen. I think Viggo's brings the most darkness, but Stormare really nails the malice and seems to turn it on and off. Check it out and judge yourself!

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    4. Re:Russian Reversal (with Magic card) by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      I haven't watched the other vids, but I do like the way Stormare handles it.
      Kind of interesting to be surprised by an actor in a different type of role.

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    5. Re:Russian Reversal (with Magic card) by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      They really don't give Stormare enough credit for his chops IMHO. That is also why I like to see actor's interpretations of Satan. It is such a character that in order to keep from just being "ohh I'm evil, boo!" an actor really has to bring their A game to the role or they will come out hammy. Stormare brings almost a lighthearted touch, with his playing around with lighting his cigarette. you can almost like the guy....until he gets pissed off, then the malice comes through. While I'd say Mortensen wins on the darkness, Stormare wins hand down for the malice. His Lucifer would probably laugh and pretend to be your friend, right up until he ripped your heart out. Now THAT is good acting!

      But check out the other two as well, as seeing multiple actors tackle the same role really gives you a feel for their acting ability. Pacino I thought started well, but then he went too overboard. There was NO subtle about his Lucifer, whereas Mortensen brought a quiet viciousness to his. Even when he was talking nicely you could just feel the contempt dripping off him. but Stormare really deserves more dramatic credit than he gets, his Lucifer in Constantine as well as his killer in Fargo are both top notch dramatic portrayals.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    6. Re:Russian Reversal (with Magic card) by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Pacino was about as subtle as Sherman's March, similar for the guy who he was feeding off of.
      Yeah, 'tis an iconic character

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  19. Do some people gonna die? by mysidia · · Score: 1

    You know it's going to change course and enter earth's atmosphere, unleashing a horde of super-nanonites that will massively replicate and rapidly consume all the resources of earth.....

  20. You can do shit about it, so be worried! by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

    Then you can stop worrying about asteroids from space - can't do anything about them anyway.

    Of course we can do something about asteroids from space! It's actually quite simple conceptually, and quite feasible technologically, to prevent a catastrophic asteroid impact, if and only if you detect them sufficiently far -- as in years -- in advance. A spacecraft of reasonable mass equipped with ion engines for long-term station keeping could act as a gravity tractor and pull the asteroid out of the impact trajectory. It doesn't take a whole lot of acceleration today to prevent an impact in five or ten years.

    So you should be worrying, and asking your politicians what they are doing to make sure we can detect planet-killer asteroids sufficiently far in advance. We need more funding for searching and tracking of asteroids, and some test missions to work the kinks out of the process of actually moving asteroids so we're ready if we find an potential danger without sufficient time for an R&D phase.

    We're starting to fund the search/tracking part, though still inadequately for the magnitude of the problem (as in the amount of space and potential objects). Only the Russians AFAIK are doing anything about actually trying to implement the solution to actually preventing a catastrophic impact. More funding pls thx!

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
    1. Re:You can do shit about it, so be worried! by Dthief · · Score: 1

      Luckily (I say this because military applications increase the chance of funding) this technology could also be used to do the same thing with an asteroid that was going to miss, but instead we make it hit the earth!

      --
      www.RacquetUp.org - Helping Detroit Youth
  21. Finally we get our flying car ! by NemoinSpace · · Score: 1
    FTA:

    A newly-discovered car-sized asteroid will fly past Earth early Tuesday.

    Don't complain about stupid jokes. In space no one can hear you, on Slashdot no one cares.

  22. move along, nothing to see here by us7892 · · Score: 1

    Paraphrasing, an asteroid this size would burn up in our atmosphere.

    Move along, nothing to see here.

    1. Re:move along, nothing to see here by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      This is not the asteroid we're looking for?

  23. Message recieved from asteroid: by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    NASA has intercepted a stream messages being constantly coming from the "asteroid". It has been decoded. It says, "Attention Heaven's Gate. Your pick up time is in 24 hours. Please prepare. Sorry for the delay"

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  24. NASA artists impression? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're gonna tell me that the "artists impression" credited by NASA is 33000 miles from Earth? It looks like 2000 miles altitude at most. This is the kind of dishonesty that ruins the public faith in anything to do with the government.

  25. Nasa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nasa this is this what we need for my country,where on the world is the best place to find asteroid fragments
    Katalog Firm

  26. Night of the Asteroid! by stink_eye · · Score: 1

    I for one will sleep in my corrugated tin shed with a loaded shotgun and rations and wait to welcome our new zombie overlords...

  27. What are the correct precautions? by shikaisi · · Score: 1

    What should I do? Take my hat off

    --
    No left turn unstoned.
    1. Re:What are the correct precautions? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Lay down and put a paper bag over your head.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect