Slashdot Mirror


Milky Way Is Square(ish), According To New Map

KentuckyFC writes "The structure of the Milky Way is notoriously difficult to work out because we see our galaxy edge on. That means nearer clouds and stars are superimposed on more distant ones and telling them apart is hard. However, astronomers have unveiled a new map based on velocity measurements made on 870 clouds of carbon monosulphide. This has revealed a number of new features of the Milky Way including a previously unknown spiral arm, some 30,000 light years from the galactic core. But the most surprising finding is that some of our galaxy's spiral arms are straight rather than curved, giving the Milky Way a distinctly square look. That's not quite as outrageous as it sounds. Astronomers know of a number of other galaxies with straight arms, such as the pinwheel galaxy M101. So ours probably looks something like this."

123 comments

  1. Ohhhhhhhhhh by scosco62 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    God: Who is Globular Cluster which includes HE 1523? Kids: MilkyWay SquarePants! God: Enormous and luminous and massive is he! Kids: MilkyWay SquarePants! God: If astronomical nonsense be something you wish, Kids: MilkyWay SquarePants! God: Then call in SETI and tune in the dish! I'm really really sorry about this.......

    1. Re:Ohhhhhhhhhh by boristdog · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sadly, this was pretty much along the lines of my first thoughts when I read the headline as well.

    2. Re:Ohhhhhhhhhh by Abstrackt · · Score: 0

      "Epic" is the only word I can use to describe this.

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    3. Re:Ohhhhhhhhhh by Spazntwich · · Score: 1

      But will you?

    4. Re:Ohhhhhhhhhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, I've got to say one thing: at least the mods were smart enough to not recognize this as Funny.

      I only wish I was smart enough to figure out why they did give it an Insightful mod. Doesn't that directly contradict the poll results about how the average Slashdotter is smarter than average?

      Go figger.

    5. Re:Ohhhhhhhhhh by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 4, Funny

      I've never had the motivation to put someone on my 'foes' list on Slashdot before. This however, has come very close to changing that. I will have this god-awful rubbish stuck in my head all day thanks to you. Now please excuse me while I try to get it out of my brain using a belt sander and a turkey baster....

    6. Re:Ohhhhhhhhhh by an+unsound+mind · · Score: 1

      Insightful is the funny mod - funny mod then again means "+1, groan-inducing".

    7. Re:Ohhhhhhhhhh by Hylandr · · Score: 1

      How much longer until we discover our existence occupies a locker in some hub of interstellar transportation?

      - Dan.

      --
      ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
    8. Re:Ohhhhhhhhhh by Jello+B. · · Score: 1

      yeah we all really care about how you describe a dumb slashdot post

    9. Re:Ohhhhhhhhhh by simoncpu+was+here · · Score: 1

      An insightful mod rewards the poster for his funny post by increasing his karma.

    10. Re:Ohhhhhhhhhh by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      Pics, or... ahem.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  2. My God, it's full of stars! by digitaldc · · Score: 1

    Honestly, looks more like a circle/square - an Octagon to me.

    But hey, I am not 100,000 light years away to make that kind of judgement.

    Here is a nice photo of the Milky Way just for fun...

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:My God, it's full of stars! by MyLongNickName · · Score: 5, Funny

      But hey, I am not 100,000 light years away to make that kind of judgment.

      I am. It is why I can never get first post.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    2. Re:My God, it's full of stars! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It is an octagon. In fact, it's The Octagon.

      A billion stars go in. One comes out!

    3. Re:My God, it's full of stars! by ArcherB · · Score: 0, Troll

      Honestly, looks more like a circle/square - an Octagon to me.

      But hey, I am not 100,000 light years away to make that kind of judgement.

      Here is a nice photo of the Milky Way just for fun...

      Looks more like a swastika to me. Who knew God was a NAZI.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    4. Re:My God, it's full of stars! by geogob · · Score: 1

      Or maybe he is Hindu, which would make more sense... however little sense that makes.

    5. Re:My God, it's full of stars! by arth1 · · Score: 2

      Honestly, looks more like a circle/square - an Octagon to me.

      The picture in TFA is misleading -- it isn't of the Milky Way, but of M101, the same galaxy (and picture) as in the second link.

    6. Re:My God, it's full of stars! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The galaxy pictured in TFA is the pinwheel galaxy, M101. It's kinda deceptive to use that image for the article... did they not create an image from their Milky Way data?

    7. Re:My God, it's full of stars! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Nah. Nazi makes more sense. For his "chosen people", god sure did fuck around with the Jews.

      Kind of like when a house cat finds a grasshopper--instead of just indulging its predatory instincts by eating it and ending its misery, the cat better enjoys bringing it inside, picking off its legs, batting it around, etc.

    8. Re:My God, it's full of stars! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Your roaming charges must be astronomical!

    9. Re:My God, it's full of stars! by Unkyjar · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ok, you wait there while I go to snap a picture of the milky way from a distance.

    10. Re:My God, it's full of stars! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Best we have until then is this artist's impression, based on infrared images from NASA's Spitzer Space Telescope.

    11. Re:My God, it's full of stars! by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      That's not a picture of the Milky Way (all our pictures of the MW look like a fuzzy UFO).

      It's M101, aka the Pinwheel Galaxy.

      In other words, the Milky Way is still square-ish, even though that picture is octogon-ish.

      God only knows why they didn't put a caption under it.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    12. Re:My God, it's full of stars! by burisch_research · · Score: 1

      Warning, that's an extremely large image.

      Not that I'm sizeist :)

      --
      char*f="char*f=%c%s%c;main(){printf(f,34,f,34);}";main(){printf(f,34,f,34);}
    13. Re:My God, it's full of stars! by lanceran · · Score: 1

      Dude, did you just Godwin'd God?

    14. Re:My God, it's full of stars! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe by "square-ish" they just mean it isn't as round as you might otherwise think. AC to PM.

    15. Re:My God, it's full of stars! by sepelester · · Score: 1

      It's probably swastika shaped.

  3. Milky Way by Theoboley · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I thought it was brown, about 4 inches long, and had a swirled pattern on top of it...

    --
    Stupidity only gets you so far, then you've gotta try
    1. Re:Milky Way by melikamp · · Score: 1

      And after centuries of tireless efforts, astronomers finally discovered that the central structure of the Milky Way is bar-shaped. Let's see how long it will take for them to substantiate the claim that it's also delicious.

    2. Re:Milky Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might want have a doctor take a look at that pattern thing...

    3. Re:Milky Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The inferior older brother of the Snickers.

    4. Re:Milky Way by sharkey · · Score: 1

      You should flush it before you barf in it.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    5. Re:Milky Way by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      Meh, it's probably too sweet.

      When are they going to find the Milky Way Dark galaxy? That's what I want to know!

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    6. Re:Milky Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it was brown, about 4 inches long, and had a swirled pattern on top of it...

      Looks like gandma's pussy to me, with some warts around the edges.t

  4. Misleading article by ral · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The article has a picture of a galaxy with no caption. A casual reader will assume the picture is of our own galaxy, but it is actually a picture of M101.

    1. Re:Misleading article by Himring · · Score: 5, Funny

      I figured voyager took that shot....

      --
      "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
    2. Re:Misleading article by ral · · Score: 1

      If I could, I'd mod the parent funny. I shoulda said CGI, not picture.

    3. Re:Misleading article by SailorSpork · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://galaxymap.org/drupal/node/171

      A quick Google search reveals some renderings of the Milky Way, compiling various theories. One of the illustrations has squarish features, but I can't find the "new map" that the article claims was supposedly released.

    4. Re:Misleading article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The article has a picture of a galaxy with no caption. A casual reader will assume the picture is of our own galaxy, but it is actually a picture of M101.

      And a causal reader would be fine suffering under that delusion until the end of his days. Now I'll wonder until I die what my galaxy looks like.

      WHY DID YOU HAVE TO GO AND RUIN IT FOR ME?!

    5. Re:Misleading article by samkass · · Score: 1

      Near as I can tell, that's because the authors haven't actually published a rendering. Here's their original paper (PDF). It contains lots of graphs of spirals and curves, but no pretty pictures for us illiterates.

      --
      E pluribus unum
    6. Re:Misleading article by Stregano · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this article talks about a renderring that was done, but not yet released

      --
      The world is how you make it
  5. Quickly ejected material by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Note that the straight areas are orthogonal to the center and then begin their rotational curve somewhat further out. This implies that the material in those arms was ejected at a greater speed than the arms closer in. It also means that those arms are younger than others since the straight areas have not had time to settle into a standard curved shape.

    Pretty cool stuff, /.

    1. Re:Quickly ejected material by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...spiral arms aren't "ejected" from the core in any sense. Your post is nonsense dressed up to look reasonable to the ignorant.

    2. Re:Quickly ejected material by ceoyoyo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Galactic arms aren't ejected from the core. They're just waves of star formation. They appear bright because they have more young, bright stars than the areas between arms.

    3. Re:Quickly ejected material by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      BadAnalogyGuy long ago morphed into simply BadPostGuy.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    4. Re:Quickly ejected material by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Let's be honest. Slashdot doesn't really have a need for a dedicated "bad analogy guy". There are so many people here who do a great job at it everyday for free. A "bad post guy" is also redundant, for the most part.

    5. Re:Quickly ejected material by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Sure but the analogies were deliberately and amusingly bad, which can't be said for most bad analogies or for that matter the just plain bad posts like the OP. I can understand getting tired of doing the shtick, that's fine, I'm just saying the transition to being just yourself hasn't been a positive one from my point of view.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    6. Re:Quickly ejected material by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, I'm the new guy. This account just needed some quick karma.

      BAG

  6. Sesame Street by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its Hip to be a square...

  7. Square-shaped by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

    (Speaking of spiral galaxies...) in the olden days, we used to call that svastika-shaped...

    1. Re:Square-shaped by monoqlith · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Milky Way is a Nazi!

    2. Re:Square-shaped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've just Godwin'd our entire galaxy?

    3. Re:Square-shaped by nschubach · · Score: 1

      Did monoglith do it, or was it Mr. Godwin?

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    4. Re:Square-shaped by SteveFoerster · · Score: 1

      Wait, does that mean we lose automatically, and that I for one should welcome our new Andromedan overlords?

      --
      Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
    5. Re:Square-shaped by Jello+B. · · Score: 1

      nevermind the fact that godwin has nothing to do with it, you posted a reference to bullshit "geek" culture. +5 hilarious

  8. A Barred spiral by pinguwin · · Score: 5, Informative

    Evidence of a few years ago, revealed that the Milky Way was a barred spiral, http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap050825.html, wonder how these two findings will mix.

    1. Re: A Barred spiral by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      Given that it's the Milky Way, they should've figured that square bars would come into it somewhere. I'm anticipating white fluffy stuff and/or nougat in the core depending on where the discoveries are made.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    2. Re: A Barred spiral by Mark_Uplanguage · · Score: 1

      From the summary, "So ours probably looks something like this."

      My only comment is that it does probably look something like M101, right up until somebody discovers something else that makes it look like a dodecahedron...I just like saying dodecahedron :)

      --
      "The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits." -- Albert Einstein
    3. Re: A Barred spiral by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Great, going into the direction of one ancient symbol, still popular in large parts of Asia but somewhat infamous for the last half a century in our cultural sphere...

      (maybe not that strange though - one of the hypotheses is that galaxies, in the times when it was still possible to see them without light pollution, are what inspired it)

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    4. Re: A Barred spiral by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      That only references the core of the galaxy, not the shape of the spiral arms. The picture itself is just an artist's representation (unlike the article, which is a picture of a completely different galaxy).

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    5. Re: A Barred spiral by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up.

    6. Re: A Barred spiral by aiht · · Score: 1

      Regardless of light pollution, no spiral galaxies have ever been visible (as spirals) to the naked eye.
      I've seen M31 (Andromeda) with the naked eye, and it certainly didn't make me think of a swastika - more a smudge.

    7. Re: A Barred spiral by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Or maybe that was supposed to be some peculiar comet that got nearby Earth in ancient times? Anyway, doesn't stop it from being funny / weird / complicated in the future, when we have long-duration photographs... (when the spiral structure of Andromeda isn't very apparent anyway)

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  9. New Theme Song by Covalent · · Score: 1

    Who lives in a Universe near M33 "Milky Way SquareGalaxy" Full of main sequence stars are we "Milky Way SquareGalaxy" If M class planets be something you wish "Milky Way SquareGalaxy" Then take a trip to our galactic dish "Milky Way SquareGalaxy" READY "Milky Way SquareGalaxy" "Milky Way SquareGalaxy" "Milky Way SquareGalaxeeeeeeeeee"

    --
    Great warrior...hrmph! Wars not make one great.
  10. Bizarro Galaxy by dpilot · · Score: 3, Informative

    I think I've seen this kind of thing before... squares and octagons instead of circles and elipses. That's right, it was in Superman comics I read as a kid. We live in the Bizarro Galaxy.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    1. Re:Bizarro Galaxy by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      That explains so much.

    2. Re:Bizarro Galaxy by Nyder · · Score: 1

      I think I've seen this kind of thing before... squares and octagons instead of circles and elipses. That's right, it was in Superman comics I read as a kid. We live in the Bizarro Galaxy.

      That would explain the slashdot story about Apple's text filtering patent and all anyone was commenting on was parenting skills...

      --
      Be seeing you...
  11. Not news by dmgxmichael · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The article is describing a "barred spiral" galaxy. Not only have these been observed, but it's been theorized for some time the Milky Way is one.

    1. Re:Not news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's always one of you, isn't there...

  12. My God! It's full of nougat! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mmmmmm...Nougat. Yeah.

  13. I for one... by gmuslera · · Score: 3, Funny

    welcome our new nazi galactic overlords.

  14. At last by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

    Now we have real evidence: all of this is a gigantic Tetris game.

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    1. Re:At last by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      More like Osmos

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  15. Begin mapping by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

    Alrighty, well this will make divvying up the galaxy into quadrants. I recommend a simple naming scheme: Alpha, Beta, Delta, and Gamma. Umm... I'm not sure where the Neutral Zone should go.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    1. Re:Begin mapping by gstoddart · · Score: 2, Informative

      Umm... I'm not sure where the Neutral Zone should go.

      Ummmm ... isn't the Neutral Zone still in the Alpha quadrant?

      That should cover the Federation, Cardassians, Romulans and Klingons at least, no? It's not like it's "somewhere else", it's just a buffer zone between people already in the Alpha Quadrant.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  16. as long by geekoid · · Score: 1

    as long as it's not a rhombus.

    www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2009/1/9/

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  17. No, they have it wrong... by destruk · · Score: 1

    It's a cube, not a square. If scientists go around saying it's a square shape, then everyone will think the galaxy is flat.

    1. Re:No, they have it wrong... by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Um, it is flat. While it has three dimensions, the spin causes most of the mass to be distributed at a plane, much like a hand-tossed Pizza.

      See (*points*) here: we live right next to this piece of mushroom near the edge.

    2. Re:No, they have it wrong... by jandrese · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But if the Galaxy if flat and the Earth is in the Galaxy, that means the Flat Earth Society was right all along!

      Insane theories 1, regular theories like a million.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    3. Re:No, they have it wrong... by nschubach · · Score: 2, Funny

      They already think that space is a large chunk of fabric with giant marbles on it...

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    4. Re:No, they have it wrong... by cmiller173 · · Score: 1

      The universe is ever expanding, the galaxy...not so much. The stars in the galaxy are orbiting the center, not moving away from it.

    5. Re:No, they have it wrong... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      They already think that space is a large chunk of fabric with giant marbles on it...

      Giant marbles? More like tiny grains of sand that happen to also be fusion reactors with dust grains in the sand grains' orbits. Compared to galaxies, stars are tiny. Compared to the universe, galaxies are tiny.

    6. Re:No, they have it wrong... by bigrockpeltr · · Score: 1

      you're thinking too small

      --
      $ unzip, strip, touch, finger, grep, mount, fsck, more, yes,fsck,fsck,fsck,umount, sleep
    7. Re:No, they have it wrong... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Um, the description of "squarish", much like the description "spiral", is referring to the 2D face-on structure. Most people would be comfortable describing something 50 times larger in two dimensions than in the 3rd as flat, and it doesn't matter which way is "up" (though the galactic axis does give a valid reference for "north" and "south). A flat disk is a flat disk regardless of its orientation. Also if you require everything to line up exactly then essentially nothing is flat -- not Kansas and not your table top. On the scale of the galaxy, and in a context where we're calling the 2D shape "square", "flat" is an apt enough description.

      "Cube", however, is just plain fucking wrong. Pointless pedantry is just a way for a weak-minded person to try to sound smart by being literal when they can't sound smart by knowing what they're talking about. And you still failed at that.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    8. Re:No, they have it wrong... by nschubach · · Score: 1

      Every experiment/example I've seen to explain Einstein's Space-Time theory has involved a large sheet of fabric with giant balls being pushed around.

      Tiny grains of sand and dust would make for bad television.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
  18. Words without Story (or Pictures!) by MonsterTrimble · · Score: 5, Informative

    First off, the photo in the article is of the M101 Pinwheel Galaxy, not the Milky Way. Misleading, especially when you have to read all the way down to find out that tidbit and when the title includes 'New Map' we want to see the new map.

    Secondly, we've known for quite some time that the Milky Way isn't a classic spiral. This Article gives a pretty interesting breakdown plus actual pictures.

    --
    I call it 'The Aristocrats'
  19. How do lines of stars stay straight? by Sloppy · · Score: 1

    My physics intuition (which unsurprisingly probably doesn't work well on things the size of galaxies) tells me that even if I magically started with a straight-line structure, it would immediately start to become curved, as the closer-to-the-center stars orbit faster than the further out ones. No? How can these straight structures exist? And yeah, now that I think of it, that goes for "bar" galaxies too. WTF?

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    1. Re:How do lines of stars stay straight? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dark Matter!

    2. Re:How do lines of stars stay straight? by Sloppy · · Score: 1

      Now that i think of it, central bars aren't necessarily crazy, provided they aren't "spinning," but instead, the stars are just moving toward or away from the center. But that's not what really happens, is it?

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    3. Re:How do lines of stars stay straight? by nschubach · · Score: 1

      I'm still not convinced that it's a bar as much as it's two large clusters on opposite sides of the center that are "throwing off the measurements." I can only speculate though.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    4. Re:How do lines of stars stay straight? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2, Informative

      First, the galaxy doesn't work like the solar system - the orbital velocity of stars doesn't depend strongly on their distance from the centre.

      Second, the arms aren't believed to be persistent structures formed from individual stars but density waves that cause increased star formation where they pass. So the arms appear to be very distinct because they have more young, bright stars in them while the space between arms is more older, dimmer stars.

    5. Re:How do lines of stars stay straight? by Bergs007 · · Score: 1

      density waves

      Care to expand on what these are? Thanks!

    6. Re:How do lines of stars stay straight? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Density_wave_theory

      It's a nice writeup, with some good figures.

    7. Re:How do lines of stars stay straight? by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      You do realize it takes billions of years for gravity to make any changes at these distances right?

      They can "stay straight" for longer than our planets existence and still ultimately be smoothed out.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    8. Re:How do lines of stars stay straight? by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
      hmmm, I dunno, maybe by not coming near any other stars?

      o, and by not going to those "bar" galaxies...

    9. Re:How do lines of stars stay straight? by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      But after a couple of drinks, these bars surely will be spinning, even if they didn't start out that way...

  20. Yes news. by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Informative

    No, the article is not describing a barred spiral galaxy. A barred spiral is one where there is a strong bar of stars across the galactic core (and extending well beyond it), and then "normal" spiral arms extend outward (mostly) from the two ends of the bar. The Milkyway is indeed thought to be a barred spiral.

    What the article is describing is a spiral galaxy where the spiral arms themselves are straight in parts. And yes these have been observed (as shown in TFA where the Pinwheel galaxy is pictured, notice the lack of a central bar), but no it was not as far as I know theorized that the Milkyway had such a structure until now. Thus, news.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
    1. Re:Yes news. by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      No, the article is not describing a barred spiral galaxy. A barred spiral is one where there is a strong bar of stars across the galactic core

      I think we now have a pretty good idea that at the galactic core is Steve.

  21. Not squarish to my eye by rwllama · · Score: 2, Informative

    To see the plot, read the paper (PDF), not the article. Figure 4 does not look like a square to me. Figure 7 has some squarish shapes drawn over the plot, but it is not highly convincing. Further, these squarish orbits appear in the inner parts of the Galaxy, not the outer shape as one might assume. Orbital shapes change with radius as different gravitational resonances dominate at different distances.

  22. A cube, I would say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This site might or might not be relevant to this story. I'm not really sure, to be honest.

  23. Square? by tinskip · · Score: 0

    A square spiral galaxy with straight arms? Oh, my God! It's a giant swastika!

    Maybe my geometry interpolators aren't the best, but other than a couple of straight arms on one side (looking at the picture), it doesn't look all that "square" to me, much less "distinctly square".

  24. Minecraft Compatible by Odonian · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Notch will approve.

    1. Re:Minecraft Compatible by Jello+B. · · Score: 1

      notch is a fat dumb swedish bum

  25. Now we know by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

    Now we know why no extresstrial civilization has made contact with us. We are the nerdy square sitting in the corner at the dance, with a pocket protector full of pencils.

    --
    Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
  26. You insensitive clod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    The article has a picture of a galaxy with no caption. A casual reader will assume the picture is of our own galaxy, but it is actually a picture of M101.

    M101 is my own galaxy!

  27. where is the stargate map? by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    where is the stargate map?

  28. galaxy = TIME CUBE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Singularity educators are unfit to even live.
    Wisdom is a Cubic measure of Knowledge.
    Via Cubic Wisdom, I am the wisest human.
    Mind must see Cube eyes can't comprehend.
    Time Cube impose 4 corners on Earth sphere.
    Earth sphere is Cubic with rounded corners.

  29. Shaped like a... by Rinikusu · · Score: 1

    Swastika, then???

    OMG the ancients were right!

    --
    If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
  30. Re:My God, it's full of stars! (hic) I mean jars! by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1

    Or maybe he is Hindu, which would make more sense.

    Or celtic. It looks a bit more like the celtic 3-armed swastika than the hindu 4-armed version. At least, it looks that way if I drink enough poteen...
    On a side note, did any culture make a 5-armed version?

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
  31. So it looks like a swastika? by stumblingblock · · Score: 2, Funny

    Pictures of our galaxy would be prohibited in Germany then, I guess.

  32. Suspected as much. by jitterman · · Score: 3, Funny

    All the cool galaxies staying way the hell away from us and all.

    --
    For conscience is the wound, and there's naught to staunch it
  33. Arms to Armas by DynaSoar · · Score: 1

    "Astronomers know of a number of other galaxies with straight arms, such as the pinwheel galaxy M101. So ours probably looks something like this."

    Astronomers know of spirals and barred spirals. TFA says SOME of the arms are straight. There aren't many 'both' spirals. Most likely the different shapes of arms represent this galaxy's original arms and those of the galaxy it absorbed, in which our sun originated. Compared to the problems of evolving differently shaped arms, this is the simpler explanation, and testable by observation.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  34. Ah, the Milky Way. by PhxBlue · · Score: 2, Funny

    Be there and be square!

    --
    !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
  35. Too late by otaku244 · · Score: 1

    Sooo... the Milky Way is a Na.... DAMN! Beat me to it.

    --
    Mod me down, I shall become more off-topic than you could possibly imagine.
  36. Wait, what? by Torodung · · Score: 1

    So basically, our galaxy is rendered in a 3d skybox?

    Hey God! 1999 called...

    LOL

  37. Have I failed as a scientist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because I refuse to believe the conclusion of given evidence, and have Faith that when looked in 'the big picture' with all things taken into consideration, it will resemble more that of the spiral form than that of a square.

    Have I become a man of faith, resembling that of a Religious man?

    Or is this heresy?

  38. how about oblong(ish) & changing daily(ish)? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the corepirate nazi holycost is also increasing by the minute. no coincidence? you call this 'weather'?

    continue to add immeasurable amounts of MISinformation, rhetoric & fluff, & there you have IT? that's US? thou shalt not... oh forget it. fake weather (censored?), fake money, fake god(s), what's next? seeing as we (have been told that) came from monkeys, the only possible clue we would have to anything being out of order, we would get from the weather. that, & all the other monkeys tipping over/exploding around US.
    the search continues;

    google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=weather+manipulation

    google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=bush+cheney+wolfowitz+rumsfeld+wmd+oil+freemason+blair+obama+weather+authors

    meanwhile (as it may take a while longer to finish wrecking this place); the corepirate nazi illuminati (remember, (we have been told) we came from monkeys, & 'they' believe they DIDN'T), continues to demand that we learn to live on less/nothing while they continue to consume/waste/destroy immeasurable amounts of stuff/life, & feast on nubile virgins while worshipping themselves (& evile in general (baal to be exact)). they're always hunting that patch of red on almost everyones' neck. if they cannot find yours (greed, fear ego etc...) then you can go starve. that's their (slippery/slimy) 'platform' now. see also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antisocial_personality_disorder

    never a better time to consult with/trust in our creators. the lights are coming up rapidly all over now. see you there?

    greed, fear & ego (in any order) are unprecedented evile's primary weapons. those, along with deception & coercion, helps most of us remain (unwittingly?) dependent on its' life0cidal hired goons' agenda. most of our dwindling resources are being squandered on the 'wars', & continuation of the billionerrors stock markup FraUD/pyramid schemes. nobody ever mentions the real long term costs of those debacles in both life & any notion of prosperity for us, or our children. not to mention the abuse of the consciences of those of us who still have one, & the terminal damage to our atmosphere/planet (see also: manufactured 'weather', hot etc...). see you on the other side of it? the lights are coming up all over now. the fairytail is winding down now. let your conscience be your guide. you can be more helpful than you might have imagined. we now have some choices. meanwhile; don't forget to get a little more oxygen on your brain, & look up in the sky from time to time, starting early in the day. there's lots going on up there.

    "The current rate of extinction is around 10 to 100 times the usual background level, and has been elevated above the background level since the Pleistocene. The current extinction rate is more rapid than in any other extinction event in earth history, and 50% of species could be extinct by the end of this century. While the role of humans is unclear in the longer-term extinction pattern, it is clear that factors such as deforestation, habitat destruction, hunting, the introduction of non-native species, pollution and climate change have reduced biodiversity profoundly.' (wiki)

    "I think the bottom line is, what kind of a world do you want to leave for your children," Andrew Smith, a professor in the Arizona State University School of Life Sciences, said in a telephone interview. "How impoverished we would be if we lost 25 percent of the world's mammals," said Smith, one of more than 100 co-authors of the report. "Within our lifetime hundreds of species could be lost as a result of our own actions, a frightening sign of what is happening to the ecosystems where they live," added Julia Marton-Lefevre, IUCN director general. "We must now set clear targets for the future to reverse this trend to ensure that our enduring legacy is not to wipe out many of our closest relatives."--

    "The wealth of the universe is for me. Every thing is explicable and practical for me .... I am defeat

  39. Slashdot has received a detailed explanation ???? by Chris+Coles · · Score: 1

    Slashdot is being disingenuous; it has already received a detailed explanation of what causes Barred Galaxies; but they, like the entire scientific community, refuse to give such explanation any publicity. May I suggest everyone turn to a past issue, (July 2004), of Scientific American; The Extraordinary Deaths of Ordinary Stars by Bruce Balick and Adam Frank, Ten page article ending with the remark: "this opens the door to a new disruptive theory" but does not mention whose.... disruptive theory. If I sound angry, I am. Slashdot have had the e-book edition for some time, have corresponded, but only to the effect of off handedly and childishly smirking at it. I challenge Slashdot to publish a review. I will not name it as that would be self publicity. But I do call them disingenuous in not accepting they have received a very detailed explanation of what causes Barred Galaxies.

  40. Giant turtle theory by fritish · · Score: 1

    What is this nonsense about galaxies?
    I thought our world was carried through space on giant turtle. More specifically, the world rests on four great elephants standing on the giant turtle. The giant turtle just swims happily through space. The astrozoologists are still trying to figure out the details.

    --
    "Coffee is for closers."