Slashdot Mirror


Big Media Wants More Piracy Busting From Google

suraj.sun writes "Last month, executives from two music-industry trade groups, the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) and the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI), asked Google if it could provide a means to help them track down pirated material more efficiently. Typically, copyright owners are responsible for finding pirated links and alerting Google, which is required by law to quickly remove the links. But Google's response raised eyebrows at some of the labels. James Pond, a Google manager, wrote in a letter dated September 20, that Google would be happy to help — for a price."

17 of 186 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Search is what they do by MichaelKristopeit+64 · · Score: 2, Funny

    evil is a kind of wrong

  2. Re:Well duh by froggymana · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is that why all open source software is considered evil by big companies?

    --
    "To prevent this day from getting any worse, I'll just read ERROR as GOOD THING" 1GJU8xLuDKDxEs4KLf8fAGyptoDsqvEsBT
  3. Re:OK, question time by Nethead · · Score: 4, Funny

    WTF is a pirated link?

    Basically any Slashdot story.

    --
    -- I have a private email server in my basement.
  4. Re:OK, question time by Psychotria · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's one of those shortened URLs that bypass the DRM of the original URL while containing the same content which is most likely illegal content.

  5. Same pricing model as RIAA by bakes · · Score: 5, Funny

    'Raised eyebrows'? Maybe Google used RIAA's pricing model and asked for $10,000,000 per infringement.

    --
    Ho! Haha! Guard! Turn! Parry! Dodge! Spin! Ha! Thrust!
  6. Re:And the problem is? by MichaelKristopeit+64 · · Score: 2, Funny

    only an idiot would expect the RIAA expected them to do it for free... the real expectation was that google would not develop terminators.

  7. Big Media Wants More Piracy Busting From Google by Taibhsear · · Score: 2, Funny

    And I want a pony.

    1. Re:Big Media Wants More Piracy Busting From Google by rmm311 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Would you take a vat of industrial strength glue?

  8. Re:Of course by whoop · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's a bargain, considering with each link they lose billions and billions of dollars.

  9. Re:The summary... by AnonymousClown · · Score: 3, Funny

    According to the article which I ::gasp:: read, ....

    Dude, you got out of breath typing?!

    --
    RIP America

    July 4, 1776 - September 11, 2001

  10. Re:Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Every time someone downloads a movie.. god kills a kitten. I just hope you guys know that. Think of all the cute little kittens.

  11. Re:Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    but... but... but they are used to getting what they want, at no charge (usually at the taxpayer's expense). They aren't used to paying for the protection of their outdated distribution-control based business model!

    "I understand we charge a standard rate of $5 per thousand queries, which is charged to recover our costs in providing this service," Pond wrote.

    A music industry source estimated that such charges could add up to several million dollars a year.

    If you burn 5 million dollars, you get... [Dr.EvilVoice]ONE BILLION queries! [/Dr.EvilVoice]

  12. HOLY CRAP! ARE YOU SERIOUS??? by SudoGhost · · Score: 4, Funny

    Big Media Wants More Piracy Busting From Google

    This just in:

    Cigarette companies want to downplay the harmful effects of tobacco.
    (Insert party here) wants more control over the senate.
    Religious officials suggest being religious is good for you.

    I'd file this one under the No Shit category.

  13. Re:Of course by ThanatosST · · Score: 3, Funny

    So god wants some more kittens to play with up in heaven. Who are you to deny him cute little fluffy play toys?

  14. The price... by russotto · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...was set at THEIR SOULS.

    The record industry executives immediately pointed out that they HAVE no souls of their own, and would the company accept souls they had collected from musicians and filesharers? They were told in no uncertain terms that third party souls would NOT be accepted.

  15. Re:Search is what they do by tkrotchko · · Score: 2, Funny

    There are plugins that already do that.

    If you want to find them, use Google.

    --
    You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
  16. Pond.. by db10 · · Score: 2, Funny

    .. James Pond