Slashdot Mirror


Badgers Digging Up Ancient Human Remains

One of England's oldest graveyards is under siege by badgers. Rev Simon Shouler now regularly patrols the grounds of St. Remigius Church looking for bones that the badgers have dug up. The badger is a protected species in England so they can not be killed, and attempts to have them relocated have been blocked by English Nature. From the article: "At least four graves have been disturbed so far; in one instance a child found a leg bone and took it home to his parents. ... Rev. Simon Shouler has been forced to carry out regular patrols to pick up stray bones, store them and re-inter them all in a new grave."

18 of 172 comments (clear)

  1. Oblig by sgbett · · Score: 4, Funny
    --
    Invaders must die
  2. Burying Bodies by DirtyCanuck · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is it me or is the tradition of being buried becoming more and more ridiculous the further we venture into the reality that is the future.

    Frankly cremation is the current preference, that doesn't end in a badger exhumation.

    1. Re:Burying Bodies by asliarun · · Score: 5, Funny

      I totally agree. Only a human being faces the possibility of being badgered in both life and in death.

    2. Re:Burying Bodies by sznupi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Burning wastes resources... and for what? (well, in many places burying does, too - seriously, concrete tombs and metal caskets?)

      A solace for living participants that there will be some reflection about them; preferably in an orderly manner. That they will be remembered - but ultimately we ourselves don't treat very old memorials, very old customs, very old faiths as anything more than archeological curiosities.

      PS. Also, Ig Nobel 2008:

      ARCHAEOLOGY PRIZE. Astolfo G. Mello Araujo and José Carlos Marcelino of Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil, for measuring how the course of history, or at least the contents of an archaeological dig site, can be scrambled by the actions of a live armadillo.
      REFERENCE: "The Role of Armadillos in the Movement of Archaeological Materials: An Experimental Approach," Astolfo G. Mello Araujo and José Carlos Marcelino, Geoarchaeology, vol. 18, no. 4, April 2003, pp. 433-60.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    3. Re:Burying Bodies by Hylandr · · Score: 5, Insightful

      All these interstate highways have at least 50 feet of available burial ground between the lanes and small critters often don't have much of a chance at making it over to invade.

      Problem solved.

      - Dan.

      --
      ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
    4. Re:Burying Bodies by sznupi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's quite the other way around..."natural" burials scale exceedingly well. Number of people who have ever died is estimated at around 100 billion. Add to that countless other species in the time span of hundreds of millions of years, I don't think cremation of remains (not to mention industrial diamonds) is anywhere near scalable.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    5. Re:Burying Bodies by sgbett · · Score: 3, Informative

      We don't have states or highways, thus we do not have interstate highways. When I say 'some countries' that was for the benefit of the american audience, what I mean is 'not in america'.

      Here is an interesting graphic btw. http://static02.mediaite.com/geekosystem/uploads/2010/10/true-size-of-africa.jpg

      --
      Invaders must die
    6. Re:Burying Bodies by Hylandr · · Score: 3, Funny

      Good lord, so when I take over the Earth I am moving all of humanity to Africa and refurbishing the rest of the planet..

      That is just an astounding perspective. Thank You!

      - Dan.

      --
      ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
    7. Re:Burying Bodies by Calydor · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Here lies Dan.
      He lived his life in the fast lane.
      Now he rests next to it."

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
  3. Badger badger badger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Badger badger badger badger. Leg bone! Leg bone! Ohhhhh, Grave!

  4. Badgers? by pablo_max · · Score: 3, Funny

    We don't need no stinking...ah forget it.

  5. Re:Am I strange? by mpoulton · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Am I strange? I quite like the idea oif my remains being eaten by badgers. Its part of the circle of life. I have always thought that the Native American tree burials and Zoroastrian towers of silence are somehow very satisfying and symbolic of our return to nature.

    Well, the badgers aren't so much eating your body as food. Really they're just pulling your remains out of the way of their excavation project. Rather than participating in the circle of life by providing nutrition to critters, your body is just annoying them by getting in the way of their homebuilding.

    --
    I am a geek attorney, but not your geek attorney unless you've already retained me. This is not legal advice.
  6. Re:Vigilantism by rpjs · · Score: 3, Funny

    Uh this is England. Shooting people, other than Brazilian electricians and tooled-up lawyers, is rather frowned upon here.

  7. Re:Am I strange? by CarpetShark · · Score: 4, Funny

    When they start building their homes WITH human bones, we'll have more of a problem.

  8. Re:Vigilantism by Nursie · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why would human remains trump badgers?

    Why should our emotional attachment to bit of dead folks mean that cute, furry, stripy badgers should be killed?

    I don't think it's the twilight zone. The UK has already wiped out pretty much every wild animal it ever had that was larger than a badger. And we like badgers.

  9. Re:Am I strange? by bored_engineer · · Score: 4, Informative

    Ya know: "native American" is not exactly a monolithic group. Being a descendant of north American aboriginal people, I just decided that I'm allowed to be offended for the entire group called "native American" when the label is misused. Not everybody who was here before the arrival of Europeans practiced "tree burials," so perhaps you ought to be more specific. Sioux tree burials? Nez Perce tree burials? Apache tree burials? Even this list isn't all-inclusive of the methods used in north America (pre-invasion) to bury the dead. [smaller nit to pick: that should really be native American, no Native American, just as it should be western European, not Western European. It's not necessary to capitalize every adjective.]

    I'm sorry if the above paragraph is offensive; I don't mean to be. I do, though, dislike general assumptions or statements about aboriginal American peoples. We weren't (and are not) a monolithic culture.

  10. Re:Am I strange? by sznupi · · Score: 3, Informative
    --
    One that hath name thou can not otter
  11. Bozons? by boojum.cat · · Score: 3, Funny

    The field next to St Remigius Church is said to contain remains of the main residence of the Bozon family, Lords of the manor from 1304 to 1539.

    The badgers are just trying to enforce quantum mechanics. The remains are Bozons, and belong all in one grave. If they were Fermions, they'd belong in separate ground states.

    --
    Lost: one sig, witty, 120 chars, sentimental value. Reward offered.