Slashdot Mirror


UN May Ban Blotting Out the Sun

Supervillains and Mr. Burns are among those to be most affected by the United Nations' Convention on Biological Diversity decision on space sunshades. Even though organizations like NASA have been looking into them as a possible way to slow climate change, the UN is expected to limit research into the technology or ban it outright. From the article: "The Convention may consider banning or limiting research into space sunshades. Some question their wisdom. A space sunshade would have a rapid effect on global warming and provide time to develop more permanent measures, they say. The technique has already received serious attention from NASA and other organizations. But others, such as the ETC group, an environmental and social advocacy group, fear simply blocking the sun is a bandage, meant to cover up the problem, and allow humans to continue using fossils fuels. Another fear is that geo-engineering, as techniques like this are called, could have unforeseen consequences on the weather, ecosystem and agriculture."

4 of 377 comments (clear)

  1. Reflective rooftops by by+(1706743) · · Score: 5, Informative

    Reflective rooftops have some conceptual similarities, but are somewhat less drastic.

  2. Re:Typical UN by Aqualung812 · · Score: 4, Informative
    Then you need to work on your reading:

    The Convention may consider banning or limiting research into space sunshades.

    --
    Grammer Nazis - I mod you "troll" unless you actually add something on-topic. Yes, I know I have mispellings in my sig.
  3. Re:FOX News Headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    By "not on the same order of magnitude," you actually mean "one makes lies that slant toward my ideology and the other slants against it."

    Do a scientific study and you'll find that those others are just as bad as, if not worse than Fox News.

  4. Re:FOX News Headline by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 4, Informative

    No, MSNBC and most of the 'liberal' media have shown time and time again that Fox News is clearly in the tank for the GOP/Tea Party/Conservative/Big Business groups.

    Are MSNBC unabashedly liberal? sure, that's not the point. The point is that Fox tailors their coverage and flat out LIES to their audience. My favorite example was when Fox was covering/sponsoring one of the early Tea Parties using Hannity. He is clearly heard off the air asking how many people are in the crowd and is told about 5 thousand. He then goes on air and inflates it straight to almost 25 thousand.

    Or the clear misuse of the Glenn Beck rally footage to bolster the Michelle Bachmann 'press conference'/rally. That was *not* just a video editing mistake. It happened again within a couple weeks.

    Shall we talk political contributions? When was the last time a 'liberal' mainstream media outlet contributed directly to one side of the political spectrum? Kinda hard to be 'objective' if your owner is personally funding one side.

    Shall we talk hyposcrisy? Remember the 'show us the funding' cries about the NYC Muslim Center? Who was that from? Fox and the GOP. Now, they say that asking for funding disclosures is unamerican when related to the Citizens United created groups playing a direct role in our political process.

    Sorry, Fox News is *not* a media organization anymore than K Street lobbyists are.

    --
    People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D